Skip to main content
Log in

International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: a perspective from paper and patent analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since China adopted Open-Up and Reformed Policy for global collaboration, China’s science and technology have experienced an astounding growth. Papers and patents encompass valuable scientific and technological (S&T) information and collaborative efforts. This article studies China’s international S&T collaboration from the perspective of paper and patent analysis. The results show that China’s total papers and patents have continuously increased from 2004 to 2008, the papers and patents resulting from China’s international collaboration also present a steady growth. However, there is a decline in the share of international collaboration papers and patents with a certain range due to the rapid independent R&D. China’s international scientific collaboration (ISC) is broadly distributed over many countries, the USA being the most important ISC partners. China’s international technological collaboration (ITC) is mainly carried out with USA and Taiwan, and Taiwan has been the most significant ITC partner of when taking countries’ patent output into account. Besides, ISC shows a continuous raise of Chinese papers’ citation. Even the countries with a small amount of papers and ISC with China, exert a positive influence on the impact of citation of Chinese papers as well. However, ITC does not always play an active role in the improvement of citation impact of Chinese patents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometris, 52, 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Mapping inventive activity and technological change through patent analysis: A case study of India and China. Scientometrics, 61, 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. W. (2010). Bi-lateral scientific collaboration between Taiwan and Japan: A bibliometric study of coauthored articles during 2000–2009. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 8(2), 55–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 51, 69–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel, W., & Lange, C. D. (2002). A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 54, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’ ?. On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J. C., & He, Y. (2007). Patent-bibliometric analysis on Chinese science-technology linkages. Scientometrics, 72, 403–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J. J., Cui, L., Zhang, H., Cui, L., Zhang, H., Han, D. Y., et al. (2000). Bibliometrics study of international cooperation in science and technology. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Information Science, 19, 659–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, T. W. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80, 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration. Research Policy, 26, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, V., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Averages of ratios vs. ratios of averages: an empirical analysis of four levels of aggregation. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Chang, Q. (2001). Scientometrical measurement and evaluation on international collaboration of basic research in China. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 4, 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z. Z., Lee, Y., & Chen, C. F. P. (2009). Booming or emerging? China’s technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76, 787–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., De Bruin, E., & Van Leeuwen, T. H. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33, 381–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (2008). Triad or tetrad: Another representation. ISSI Newsletter, 4, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (1996). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, 36, 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Glanzel, W. (2010). In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 82, 597–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the financial support of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 20110490472).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dar-Zen Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, J., Zhao, ZY., Zhang, X. et al. International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: a perspective from paper and patent analysis. Scientometrics 91, 65–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0529-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0529-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000).

JEL Classifications

Navigation