Abstract
Nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) have seen rapid growth and expansion in new areas in recent years. This paper provides an international patent analysis using the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) data searched by keywords of the entire text: title, abstract, claims, and specifications. A fraction of these patents fully satisfy the National Nanotechnology Initiative definition of nanotechnology (which requires exploiting specific phenomena and direct manipulation at the nanoscale), while others only make use of NSE tools and methods of investigation. In previous work we proposed an integrated patent analysis and visualization framework of patent content mapping for the NSE field and of knowledge flow pattern identification until 2002. In this paper, the results are updated for 2003, and the new trends are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Chen C & R. J. Paul, 2001. Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure, IEEE Comput. 34(3), 65–71.
Chen, H. A. L. Houston, R. R. Sewell & B. R. Schatz, 1998. Internet browsing and searching: user evaluation of category map and concept space techniques. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 49(7), 582–603.
Chen H., C. Schuffels & R. Orwig, 1996. Internet categorization and search: A machine learning approach, J. Visual Commun. Image Rep. Sp. Issue Digit. Libraries 7(1), 88–102.
Gansner E., & S. North, 2000. An open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineering. Software-Prac. Exp. 30(11), 1203–1233.
Garfield E., 1955. Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas, Science 122, 108–111.
Huang Z., H. Chen, A. Yip, G. Ng, F. Guo, Z.-K. Chen & M.C. Roco, 2003. “Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field.” J. Nanoparticle Res., 5, 333–363.
Karki M.M., 1997. Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Inform. 19, 269–272.
Lin C., H. Chen & J.F. Nunamaker, 2000. Verifying the proximity hypothesis for self-organizing maps. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 16(3), 57–70.
Mackinlay J.D., R. Rao & S.K. Card, 1999. An organic user interface for searching citation links. In: Proceedings of the CHI'95, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 67–73.
Narin F., 2000. Tech-Line Background Paper, CHI Research, Inc. Available at: http://www.chiresearch. com/techline/tlbp.pdf.
Ong T.-H., H. Chen, W.-K. Sung & B. Zhu, 2004. NewsMap: A knowledge map for online news, decision support systems. Special Issue on Collaborative Work and Knowledge Management in Electronic Business. (forthcoming).
Oppenheim C., 2000. Do Patent citations count? In: Cromin B, Atkins H.B. eds. The Web of Knowledge, Information Today, Inc., Medford.
Paull R., J. Wolfe, P. Hebert & M. Sinkula, 2003. Investing in Nanotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol. 21 (10) 1144–1147.
Roco, M.C., W.S. Williams & P. Alivisatos, (eds.), 2000, Nanotechnology Research Directions, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Boston, 2000.
Schmoch U., 1993. Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics 26, 193–211.
Siegel, R.W., E. Hu & M.C. Roco, 1998. Nanostructure Science and Technology. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht.
Small H., 1999. Visualizing science by citation mapping. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 50(9), 799–812.
USPTO, 2004. 2003 Performance and Accountability Report, available at: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ com/annual/2003/2003annualreport.pdf, page111, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, Z., Chen, H., Chen, Zk. et al. International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6, 325–354 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-4117-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-4117-6