Abstract
Studies in the field of science education have discussed using historical approaches. Although previous studies have shown the potential advantages to addressing national sciences in the classroom in countries underrepresented in the history of science, there are still few initiatives in this direction. Thus, this paper aims to explore a historical case study related to teaching Brazilian national science in a high school classroom to contribute to this line of research and evaluate how classroom dialogue and production relate to specific aspects of the historical case. The present study uses an adapted action research methodology with historical research conducted in an integrated manner with the case study in the classroom. The results showed that this adapted methodology could relate content to students’ contexts by leading them to engage and identify with the historical case and the activity itself. Critical comments on this methodology are also presented. Using Brazilian science as the historical case study revealed some themes partially related to the Brazilian context. However, science content was more relevant to the students’ context. Finally, some directions for future research are proposed, both for studies using the methodology presented and research on using the history of national sciences in countries underrepresented in the hegemonic history of science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Global North” and “Global South” are used in line with Santos and Meneses (2010), who state that the Global South is metaphorically conceived as a set of social actors that historically suffered from the damage caused by capitalism and its colonial relationships around the world. Although the Global South partly overlaps the geographic south, while it represents classes and social groups in the geographic north that have been subjected to capitalist and colonial domination, it does not include local elites from the geographic South (Santos and Meneses 2010). This relationship of domination also applies to profoundly unequal power relations such as “male–female” and “white-black”.
This name remained the same until 1974, when it was changed to “National Council for Scientific and Technological Development” (CNPq).
The word “articulator,” in the original language in which this research was carried out, means a person who articulates, who establishes contacts, agreements, etc. The word appears in the literature to talk about the actors who established connections between different social actors, as was the case with Álvaro Alberto.
Dilma Rousseff became the nation’s first female president in that year.
As discussed earlier in the article, the remuneration of scientists in Brazil is typically issued through grants, since there is no “scientist/researcher career” in the country, except occasionally in some agencies. To do science in Brazil, the interested party must either engage in post-graduate and post-doctoral programs (which provides no legislation on working hours, breaks, and other rights in general) or be hired as a university professor, which is the only academic career in universities other than technical or administrative positions.
References
AERA. (2011). Code of ethics. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 45–156.
Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432
Allchin, D., Andersen, H., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21111
Andrade, A. M. R. (1999). Físicos, mésons e política: A dinâmica da ciência na sociedade. Hucitec, Museu de Astronomia e Ciências Afins.
Andrade, A. M. R. (2006). A opção nuclear: 50 anos rumo à autonomia. MAST.
Avraamidou, L. (2019). “I am a young immigrant woman doing physics and on top of that I am Muslim”: Identities, intersections, and negotiations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 311–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21593
Avraamidou, L., & Schwartz, R. (2021). Who aspires to be a scientist/who is allowed in science? Science identity as a lens to exploring the political dimension of the nature of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, Online First, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10059-3
Barreto, W. D. M. (2010). Eletrobrás: o embate por trás de sua criação (Master’s thesis). Centro de Pesquisa e Documentação de História Contemporânea do Brasil – CPDOC, Rio de Janeiro.
Barton, A. C. (1998). Reframing “science for all” through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12(5), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904898012005004
Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5%3c441::AID-TEA4%3e3.0.CO;2-3
Burke, P. (2010). Cultural history as polyphonic history. Arbor, 186(743), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2010.743n1212
Cain, T. (2011). Teachers’ classroom-based action research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 34(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2011.552307
Carlone, H. B., Johnson, A., & Scott, C. M. (2015). Agency amidst formidable structures: How girls perform gender in science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21224
Cavicchi, E. M. (2008). Historical experiments in students’ hands: Unfragmenting science through action and history. Science & Education, 17(7), 717–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9005-2
Chamberlain, T. C. (1965). The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses: With this method the dangers of parental affection for a favorite theory can be circumvented. Science, 148(3671), 754–759. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3671.754
Chang, H. (2011). How historical experiments can improve scientific knowledge and science education: The cases of boiling water and electrochemistry. Science & Education, 20(3), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9301-8
Chang, H. (2021). Presentist history for pluralist science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 52, 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09512-8
CNPq (1952). Exposição de Motivos enviada ao senhor presidente da República, general Eurico Gaspar Dutra, pela Comissão Incumbida de Elaborar o Anteprojeto de Estruturação do Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas. In: CNPq, Relatório de Atividades do Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas em 1951, apresentado ao Ex.mo. Sr. Presidente da República Dr. Getúlio Dornelles Vargas. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional.
CNPq (1957). Relatório de Atividades do Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas em 1956, apresentado ao Exmo Sr. Presidente da República. Rio de janeiro: Ind. Gráficas Taveira.
CNPq - Centro de Memória (2021). História do CNPq. Centro de Memória - CNPq. http://centrodememoria.cnpq.br/Missao2.html. Accessed 18 May 2021.
Costa, H. H. C., & Lopes, A. C. (2018). A contextualização do conhecimento no ensino médio: Tentativas de controle do outro. Educação & Sociedade, 39(143), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1590/ES0101-73302018184558
Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing nature of science for science education. Springer.
Forato, T. C., Martins, R., & Pietrocola, M. (2012). History and nature of science in high school: Building up parameters to guide educational materials and strategies. Science & Education, 21(5), 657–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9419-3
Forato, T. C., Pietrocola, M., & Martins, R. A. (2011). Historiografia e natureza da ciência na sala de aula. Caderno Brasileiro De Ensino De Física, 28(1), 27–59. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2011v28n1p27
Galili, I., & Zinn, B. (2007). Physics and art – A cultural symbiosis in physics education. Science & Education, 16(3), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9006-1
Gandolfi, H. E. (2018). Different people in different places. Science & Education, 27(3), 259–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9971-1
Gandolfi, H. E. (2019). In defence of non-epistemic aspects of nature of science: Insights from an intercultural approach to history of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(3), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9879-8
Gavroglu, K. (2007). Uma categoria historiográfica útil – a prática científica. In: Gavroglu, K. O passado das ciências como história. Porto Editora.
Geertz, C. (1989). A Interpretação das culturas. Guanabara Koogan.
Guerra, A., Braga, M., & Reis, J. C. (2013). History, philosophy, and science in a social perspective: A pedagogical project. Science & Education, 22(6), 1485–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9501-5
Gurgel, I. (2020). Reflexões Político-Curriculares sobre a Importância da História das Ciências no Contexto da Crise da Modernidade. Caderno Brasileiro De Ensino De Física, 37(2), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2020v37n2p333
Gurgel, I., Pietrocola, M., & Watanabe, G. (2016). The role of cultural identity as a learning factor in physics: A discussion through the role of science in Brazil. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9580-5
Hall, S. (1992). The question of cultural identity. In S. Hall, D. Held, & T. McGeew (Eds.), Modernity and its future, Polity/Open University Press
Harding, S. (2015). Objectivity and diversity: Another logic of scientific research. University of Chicago Press.
Heering, P., & Höttecke, D. (2014). Historical-investigative approaches in science teaching. In International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1473–1502). Springer, Dordrecht.
Hodson, D. (2010). Science education as a call to action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2010.504478
Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order (pp. 1–45). Routledge.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.
Laraia, R. B. (1986). Cultura: Um conceito antropológico. Editora Schwarcz - Companhia das Letras.
Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard educational review, 56(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.3.bj2h231877069482
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3%3c296::AID-TEA1007%3e3.0.CO;2-R
Lightman, B. (2016). A Companion to the History of Science - Wiley Blackwell Companions to World History. John Wiley & Sons.
Livingstone, D. N. (2003). Putting science in its place. The University of Chicago Press.
Longino, H. E. (1989). Can there be a feminist science? In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism & Science (pp. 45–57). Indiana University Press.
Martins, A. F. P. (2015). Natureza da Ciência no ensino de ciências: Uma proposta baseada em “temas” e “questões.” Caderno Brasileiro De Ensino De Física, 32(3), 703–737. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2015v32n3p703
Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science to features of science. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3–26). Springer.
Milne, C. (2011). The Invention of Science: Why History of Science matters for the classroom. Sense Publishers.
Moura, C. B. (2019). Science Education, Cultural History of Science and Curriculum: Possible entanglements [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca.
Moura, C. B., & Guerra, A. (2016a). Cultural history of science: A possible path for discussing scientific practices in science teaching? Revista Brasileira De Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências, 16(3), 749–771.
Moura, C. B., & Guerra, A. (2016b). Reflexões sobre o processo de construção da ciência na disciplina de química: Um estudo de caso a partir da história dos modelos atômicos. Revista Electrónica De Investigación En Educación En Ciencias, 11(2), 64–78.
Moura, C. B., Camel, T., & Guerra, A. (2020a). Nature of Science through curriculum theory’ lenses: Curricular Normativity, Contextualization and the meanings of teaching about science. Ensaio Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências, 22, e15631. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172020210114
Moura, C. B., Guerra, A., Amaral, P., & Oliveira, F. (2017). Entre o histórico e o contemporâneo: abordando as práticas científicas em um curso sobre história e filosofia das ciências. Enseñanza de las ciencias, extra, 3517–3524.
Moura, C. B., Jager, I. T., & Guerra, A. (2020). Teaching about sciences in/for the global south: Lessons from a case study in a Brazilian classroom. In: Yacoubian, H. A. & Hansson, L. (Eds.) Nature of Science for Social Justice (pp. 137–155). Chamonix: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47260-3_8
Moura, C. B., Nascimento, M. M., & Lima, N. W. (2021). Epistemic and political confrontations around the public policies to fight COVID-19 pandemic. Science & Education, 30(3), 501–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00193-3
Nyhart, L. K. (2016). Historiography of the History of Science. A Companion to the History of Science (pp. 7–22). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118620762.ch1
Oliveira, F. F., Moura C. B., & Guerra, A. (2020, November 9–13th). National science and Physics Teaching: An analysis of publications in the last ten years. In: Proceedings of XVIII Encontro de Pesquisa em Ensino de Física, 2020. Santa Catarina (virtual), SC, Brazil.
Oreskes, N. (2019). Why trust science? Princeton UniversityPress.
Pimentel, J. (2007). La revolución científica. In M. Artola, M. Almagro, J. A. P. Martínez (Aut.), Historia de Europa (pp. 163–238), 2.
Pimentel, J. (2010). ¿Qué es la historia cultural de la ciencia? Arbor, 186(743), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2010.743n1206
Porto, P. A. (2010). História e Filosofia da Ciência no Ensino de Química: em busca dos objetivos educacionais da atualidade. In: W. L. P. Santos; O. Maldaner (Eds.) Ensino de Química em Foco (p. 159–180). Ijuí: Editora Unijuí.
Raj, K. (2013). Beyond postcolonialism… and postpositivism: Circulation and the global history of science. Isis, 104(2), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1086/670951
Roberts, L. (2009). Situating science in global history: Local exchanges and networks of circulation. Itinerario, 33(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165115300002680
Santos, B. S. & Meneses, M. P. (Eds.) Epistemologias do sul (p. 23–71). São Paulo: Cortez.
Schiebinger, L. (2001). O Feminismo Mudou a Ciência? Bauru: EDUSC.
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I., et al. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori (Ed.), Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education (pp. 65–88). Springer.
Thiollent, M. (1986) Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. São Paulo: Cortez Autores Associados.
Tolbert, S., & Bazzul, J. (2017). Toward the sociopolitical in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(2), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9737-5
Tripp, D. (2005). Action research: A methodological introduction. Educação e Pesquisa, 31(3), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022005000300009
Varelas, M., Menig, E., Wilson, A., & Kane, J. (2019). Intermingling of identities: A Black student in a middle-school science class. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09966-3
Yacoubian, H. A., & Hansson, L. (2020). Nature of science for social justice. Springer Publishing.
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable contributions.
Funding
This study was financially supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), CAPES (Fundação Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), and FAPERJ (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardinot, D., Moura, C. & Guerra, A. Challenging the “Science from nowhere” perspective in the classroom. Sci & Educ 32, 327–359 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00311-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00311-1