Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Students’ Views of Nature of Science

A Long-term Study

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nature of science (NOS) is considered an important aspect of scientific literacy. Despite efforts in guiding school students to develop more adequate NOS views, little is known about the long-term retention of students’ post-intervention views. Retention of adequate NOS views is needed for functioning as scientifically literate citizens. Moreover, little is known about the long-term impacts of NOS interventions, important for evaluating their potentials in contributing to the preparation of scientifically literate citizens. This study reports on the results of four case studies through which the researcher examines the developments of four students’ NOS views over a 13-year period. More specifically, the study sheds the spotlight on students’ long-term retentions of their NOS views as well as the long-term implications of a NOS intervention. During the academic year 2006–2007, the researcher—a high school science teacher at the time—had designed and taught an Honors Biology course, using a consensus framework of NOS as its focus, contextualized within rich science content, and embedded within an explicit–reflective method. The researcher analyzed existing data from 2006-2007. He also collected and analyzed new data in 2019. The findings of these case studies show that the four students benefited from the NOS intervention in the short term, yet their patterns of retaining their NOS views were quite different in the long term. The results showed that it is not possible to assume that a NOS intervention with the characteristics described above and delivered within the setting of an Honors Biology course would necessarily have a long-term impact on students’ views of NOS. The findings of this study are discussed in terms of who benefits from NOS instruction at the school level. Questions are generated and hypotheses are proposed for further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The development of conceptions of the nature of scientific knowledge and knowing in the middle and high school years: a cross-sectional study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:103.0.CO;2-C.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aduriz-Bravo, A. (2014). Teaching the nature of science with scientific narratives. Interchange, 45, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-015-9229-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V., Nargund-Joshi, V., Weiland, I., Pongsanon, K., & Avsar, B. (2014). What third-grade students of differing ability levels learn about nature of science after a year of instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.761365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Erumit, B. A., & Kaynak, N. E. (2019). Teaching nature of science through children’s literature: an early childhood preservice teacher study. International Journal of Science Education, 41, 2765–2787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1698785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98, 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayir, E., Cakici, Y., & Ertas, O. (2014). Exploring natural and social scientists’ views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1286–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.860496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Mulvey, B. K., & Maeng, J. L. (2016). Outcomes of nature of science instruction along a context continuum: preservice secondary science teachers’ conceptions and instructional intentions. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1151960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, K. M. (2006). An examination of preservice teachers’ views of the nature of science throughout their science methods course. International Journal of Learning, 13(7), 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, S. R., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Learning nature of science concepts through a research apprenticeship program: a comparative study of three approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science Education, 15, 463–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2007). Teaching the nature of science to secondary and post-secondary students: questions rather than tenets. Pantaneto Press. Retrieved from http://pantaneto.co.uk/teaching-the-nature-of-science-to-secondary-and-post-secondary-students-questions-rather-than-tenets-michael-clough/. Accessed 23 Nov 2020

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: why does it matter? Science & Education, 25(1–2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirdogen, B., Hanuscin, D. L., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Koseoglu, F. (2016). Development and nature of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in Science Education, 46, 575–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9472-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289–2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eymur, G. (2019). The influence of the explicit nature of science instruction embedded in the argument-driven inquiry method in chemistry laboratory on high school students’ conceptions about nature of science. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 20, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00135A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. C., & Clough, M. P. (2016). Teachers’ longitudinal NOS understanding after having completed a science teacher education program. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9594-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2013). Teachers’ nature of science implementation practices 2–5 years after having completed an intensive science education program. Science Education, 97(2), 271–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D., & Wong, S. L. (2014). From the horse’s mouth: why scientists’ views are crucial to nature of science understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2639–2665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.927936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20, 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K. (2019). Science, society, and scientific literacy. Science & Education, 28, 603–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00066-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R. (2015). A look into students’ retention of acquired nature of science understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1639–1667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1049241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinskey, M. (2020). Elementary preservice teachers’ use of speaking, listening, and writing skills to understand the importance of nature of science instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(5), 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kötter, M., & Hammann, M. (2017). Controversy as a blind spot in teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 26, 451–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: a conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leblebicioglu, G., Abik, N. M., Capkinoglu, E., Metin, D., Eroglu Dogan, E., Cetin, P. S., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Science camps for introducing nature of scientific inquiry through student inquiries in nature: two applications with retention study. Research in Science Education, 49, 1231–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9652-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2004). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301–317). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2004). Keys to teaching the nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2017). Understanding how science works: the nature of science as the foundation for science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 98(365), 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2020). Considering a consensus view of nature of science content for school science purposes. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction (pp. 23–34). Switzerland: Springer Nature.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. S. (2016). Changing preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science: why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a method sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D. M. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, B. K., & Bell, R. L. (2017). Making learning last: teachers’ long-term retention of improved nature of science conceptions and instructional rationales. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 62–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1267879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Science Framework. In PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f30da688-en.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peters-Burton, E. (2016). Scientists taking a nature of science course: beliefs and learning outcomes of career switchers. School Science and Mathematics, 116(3), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: analyzing change through time. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmann, L. C., & Butler, W. (2015). The use of journaling to assess student learning and acceptance of evolutionary science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(1), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: an explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, G. V., & Gere, A. R. (2015). Writing-to-learn the nature of science in the context of the Lewis dot structure model. Journal of Chemical Education, 92, 1325–1329. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vhurumuku, E. (2010). The impact of explicit instruction on undergraduate students’ understanding of the nature of science. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2010.10740676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 425–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.786852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yacoubian, H. A. (2015). A framework for guiding future citizens to think critically about nature of science and socioscientific issues. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1051671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yacoubian, H. A. (2018). Scientific literacy for democratic decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1420266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yacoubian, H. A., & BouJaoude, S. (2010). The effect of reflective discussions following inquiry-based laboratory activities on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1229–1252. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon

    Hagop A. Yacoubian

Authors
  1. Hagop A. Yacoubian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hagop A. Yacoubian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yacoubian, H.A. Students’ Views of Nature of Science. Sci & Educ 30, 381–408 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00179-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00179-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation