Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Looking at the Social Aspects of Nature of Science in Science Education Through a New Lens

The Role of Economics and Entrepreneurship

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Particular social aspects of the nature of science (NOS), such as economics of, and entrepreneurship in science, are understudied in science education research. It is not surprising then that the practical applications, such as lesson resources and teaching materials, are scarce. The key aims of this article are to (a) synthesize perspectives from the literature on economics of science (EOS), entrepreneurship, NOS, and science education in order to have a better understanding of how science works in society and (b) illustrate how such a synthesis can be incorporated in the practice of science education. The main objectives of this article are to (1) argue for the role and inclusion of EOS and entrepreneurship in NOS and re-define entrepreneurship in the NOS context; (2) explore the issues emerging in the “financial systems” of the Family Resemblance Approach (FRA) to NOS and propose the inclusion of contemporary aspects of science, such as EOS and entrepreneurship, into NOS; (3) conceptualize NOS, EOS, and entrepreneurship in a conceptual framework to explain how science works in the society; and (4) transform the theoretical knowledge of how science operates in society into practical applications for science teaching and learning. The conceptual framework that we propose illustrates the links between State, Academia, Market and Industry (the SAMI cycle framework). We suggest practical lesson activities to clarify how the theoretical discussions on the SAMI cycle framework can be useful and relevant for classroom practice. In this article, science refers to physics, chemistry, and biology. However, we also recommend an application of this framework to other sciences to reveal their social-institutional side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087–2107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achor, E. E., & Wilfred-Bonse, U. K. (2013). The need to integrate entrepreneurship education into science education teachers’ curriculum in Nigeria. Journal of Science and Vocational Education, 7, 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeyemo, S. A. (2009). Understanding and acquisition of entrepreneurial skills: a pedagogical re-orientation for classroom teacher in science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(3), 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. R. (2003). Bringing new technology to market. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

  • Amos, A. A., & Onifade, C. A. (2013). The perception of students on the need for entrepreneurship education in teacher education programme. Global Journal of Human Social Science, 13(3), 75–80.

  • Annetta, L., Shapiro, M., & Lamb, R. (2017, April). Entrepreneurial thinking: Cross-cutting concepts for science teachers. Paper presented at NARST 90th Annual International Conference, San Antonio, USA.

  • Armstrong, P., & Tomes, A. (2010). Entrepreneurship in science: case studies from liquid crystal application. Prometheus, 18(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Bozeman, B., Combs, K. L., Feldman, M., Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., et al. (2002). The economics of science and technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(2), 155–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacanak, A. (2013). Teachers’ views about science and technology lesson effects on the development of students' entrepreneurship skills. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 622–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikse, V., & Riemere, I. (2013). The development of entrepreneurial competences for students of mathematics and the science subjects: The Latvian experience. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 511–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. J., Hayward, D. J., & Allen, D. N. (1993). Conflicts in the commercialization of knowledge: perspectives from science and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17(4), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdthistle, N. (2004). Small family businesses as learning Organisations: an Irish study, unpublished thesis (doctoral thesis), University of Limerick.

  • Birdthistle, N., Hynes, B., & Fleming, P. (2007). Enterprise education programmes in secondary schools in Ireland: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Education+ Training Journal, 49(4), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J., Hashimzade, N., & Myles, G. (2009). A dictionary of economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Board of Education and Discipline (2013). Turkish science curriculum. Ankara: Board of Education and Discipline.

  • Brown, W. (2003). Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory & Event, 7(1), Johns Hopkins University Press. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Project MUSE database.

  • Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buang, N. A., Halim, L., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2009). Understanding the thinking of scientists entrepreneurs: Implications for science education in Malaysia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(2), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (2008). Globalization and science education: the implications of science in the new economy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 617–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, P., Murphy, R., Rath, A., & Hall, K. (2009). Learning to teach and its implications for the continuum of teacher education: a nine-country cross-national study. Maynooth: The Teaching Council.

  • DES (Department of Education and Skills). (2004). A brief description of the Irish education system (pp. 1–36). Dublin: Communications Unit Department of Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Skills) (2015). Junior Cycle Science Curriculum Specification. (pp. 1–26). Dublin: Communications Unit Department of Education and Science.

  • Deveci, I. (2016). Perceptions and competence of Turkish pre-service science teachers with regard to entrepreneurship. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 153–170.

  • Deveci, I., & Cepni, S. (2014). Entrepreneurship in science teacher education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(2), 161–188.

  • Deveci, I., & Seikkula-Leino, J. (2016). Finnish science teacher educators’ opinions about the implementation process related to entrepreneurship education. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. M. J. (2008). Economics of science. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 7, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., & Millar, R. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejilibe, O. C. (2012). Entrepreneurship in biology education as a means for employment. Knowledge Review, 26(3), 96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (2014). Beyond nature of science: The case for reconceptualising ‘science’ for science education. Science Education International, 25(1), 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Mugaloglu, E. Z. (2013). Interactions of economics of science and science education: Investigating the implications for science teaching and learning. Science & Education, 22(10), 2405–2425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: a “triple helix” of university-industry-government relations. Minerva, 36(3), 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2004). Education for entrepreneurship: making progress in promoting entrepreneurial attitudes and skills through primary and secondary education. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2008). Entrepreneurship in higher education, especially in non-business studies. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Entrepreneurship education at school in Europe: national strategies, curricula and learning outcomes. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezeudu, F. O., Ofoegbu, T. O., & Anyaegbunnam, N. J. (2013). Restructuring STM (science, technology, and mathematics) education for entrepreneurship. US-China Education Review A, 3(1), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M., Davidson, A. I., & Burchell, G. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 

  • Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. P. (2002). Entrepreneurship. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill.

  • Hoselitz, B. F. (1952). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 12(1), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, B., Costin, Y., & Birdthistle, N. (2010). 'Practice-based learning in entrepreneurship education: A means of connecting knowledge producers and users', higher education. Skills and Work-based Learning, 1(1), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G. (2007). Commercialization of science in a neoliberal world. In Reading Karl Polanyi for the twenty-first century (pp. 135–153). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G. (2013). Introduction: Commercialization of academic science and a new agenda for science education. Science & Education, 22(10), 2375–2384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7), 591–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 999–1021). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Jiang, H., Xiong, W., & Cao, Y. (2017). Research on the mechanism of entrepreneurial education quality, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention in social sciences, engineering and science education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3709–3721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2015). Reconceptualizing the nature of science. Science & Education, 24(9–10), 1241–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. F., & Edwards, C. G. (1987). Entrepreneurial science: new links between corporations, universities, and government. New York: Forum Books.

  • Johson, K., & Amiraly, A. (2017). Bringing entrepreneurial methods into the scientific classroom: A case study of action learning at Ecole polytechnique. HAL, 486(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, S., Birdthistle, N. and Erduran, S. (2018). From traditional to contemporary aspects of NOS: Trainee science teachers' perceptions on economics and entrepreneurship, in National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST): 2018 Annual International Conference, Atlanta, GA, United States, 10–13 March.

  • Kelly, G. (2007). Scientific literacy, discourse, and knowledge. In Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium, Upsala, Sweden (pp. 47-55).

  • Kleppe, J. A. (2002). Teaching invention, innovation, and entrepreneurship to Northern Nevada high school science and math teachers. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 44(5), 115–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S. (2004). Science in the private interest: Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research?. Lanham: Rowman-Littlefield Publishing.

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S.-W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepistö, J., & Ronkko, M. L. (2013). Teacher students as future entrepreneurship educators and learning facilitators. Education + Training Journal, 55(7), 641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maci, S. (2017). Per-Simon Kildal: Friend, scientist, educator, entrepreneur. In 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Paris, (pp. 215–219).

  • Martin, A. M., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Mustari, E., & Price, R. (2017). Effectual reasoning and innovation among entrepreneurial science teacher leaders: a correlational study. Research in Science Education, 1, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, A. F. P., & Ryder, J. (2015). Nature of science in science education: A proposal based on ‘themes’. In GIREP-MPTL International Conference on Teaching/Learning Physics, Poland.

  • Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (2014). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.

  • McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 3–39). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P., & Sent, E. M. (2002). Science bought and sold: Essays in the economics of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Mirowski, P., & Sent, E. M. (2008). The commercialization of science, and the response of STS*. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, J. Wajcmanet al. (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 635-689). Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwakaego, O. N., & Kabiru, A. M. (2015). The need to incorporate entrepreneurship education into chemistry curriculum for colleges of education in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Policy and Entrepreneurial Research, 2(5), 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, A. L. (2004). Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations. Research Policy, 33(4), 583–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perutz, M. F. (2002). I wish I'd made you angry earlier: essays on science, scientists, and humanity. USA: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origin of our time. Beacon Hill: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radder, H. (2010). The commodification of academic research: analyses, assessment, alternatives. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B., & Elliott, K. C. (2013). Taking financial relationships into account when assessing research. Accountability in Research, 20(3), 184–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V., Barry, D., & Ketchen, D. J. (2009). Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (2001). Should the government subsidize supply or demand in the market for scientists and engineers? In A. B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy (pp. 221–252, Vol. 1). Cambridge: MIT press.

  • Sadler, T. D., & Dawson, V. (2012). Socio-scientific issues in science education: Contexts for the promotion of key learning outcomes. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 799–809). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. (2007). Scientific paradigms, entrepreneurial opportunities and cycles in economic growth. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as method: open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A. (1975). The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur. Psychology Today, 9(6), 83–88.

  • Stephan, P. E. (1996). Economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1199–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Entrepreneurial School (2014-2015). A project for teachers by teachers: the entrepreneurial school. http://entrepreneurialschool.eu/the-entrepreneurial-school. Accessed 16 June 2016.

  • Timmons, J. A. (1989). The entrepreneurial mind. Andover: Brick House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EPI-STEM National Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Sila Kaya & Orla McCormack

  2. Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Sibel Erduran

  3. Department of Business Technology and Entrepreneurship, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia

    Naomi Birdthistle

Authors
  1. Sila Kaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sibel Erduran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naomi Birdthistle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Orla McCormack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sila Kaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaya, S., Erduran, S., Birdthistle, N. et al. Looking at the Social Aspects of Nature of Science in Science Education Through a New Lens. Sci & Educ 27, 457–478 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9990-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9990-y

Search

Navigation