Adams, R., Wu, M., Macaskill, G., Haldane, S. A., & Sun, X. X. (2016). ConQuest [computer software]. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Allchin, D. (2005). The dilemma of dominance. Biology and Philosophy, 20(2), 427–451.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bowling, B. V., Acra, E. E., Wang, L., Myers, M. F., Dean, G. E., Markle, G. C., Moskalik, C. L., & Heuther, C. A. (2008). Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates. Genetics, 178(1), 15–22.
Browning, M. E., & Lehman, J. D. (1988). Identification of student misconceptions in genetics problem solving via computer program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 747–761.
Castéra, J., & Clément, P. (2014). Teachers’ conceptions about the genetic determinism of human behaviour: a survey in 23 countries. Science & Education, 23(2), 417–443.
Castéra, J., Clément, P., Abrougui, M., Nisiforou, O., Valanides, N., Turcinaviciene, J., … & Carvalho, G. (2008). Genetic determinism in school textbooks: a comparative study conducted among sixteen countries. Science Education International, 19(2), 163–184.
Cavallo, A. M. (1994). Do females learn biological topics by rote more than males? The American Biology Teacher, 56(6), 348–352.
Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.
Clough, E. E., & Driver, R. (1986). A study of consistency in the use of students’ conceptual frameworks across different task contexts. Science Education, 70, 473–496.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. New York: Erlbaum.
College Board. (2015). AP biology course and exam description. https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/ap/ap-biology-course-and-exam-description.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.
College Board. (2016). The SAT subject tests student guide. https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/pdf/sat-subject-tests-student-guide.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.
Collins, A. (1986). Strategic knowledge required for desired performance in solving transmission genetics problems. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI.
Collins, A., & Stewart, J. H. (1989). The knowledge structure of Mendelian genetics. The American Biology Teacher, 51(3), 143–149.
Corbett, A., Kauffman, L., Maclaren, B., Wagner, A., & Jones, E. (2010). A cognitive tutor for genetics problem solving: learning gains and student modeling. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 219–239.
Couch, B. A., Wood, W. B., & Knight, J. K. (2015). The molecular biology capstone assessment: a concept assessment for upper-division molecular biology students. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(1), ar10.
Creech, L. R., & Sweeder, R. D. (2012). Analysis of student performance in large-enrollment life science courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 386–391.
Dimitrov, D. M. (1999). Gender differences in science achievement: differential effect of ability, response format, and strands of learning outcomes. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 445–450.
Dogru-Atay, P., & Tekkaya, C. (2008). Promoting participants’ learning in genetics with the learning cycle. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(3), 259–280.
Dougherty, M. J., Pleasants, C., Solow, L., Wong, A., & Zhang, H. (2011). A comprehensive analysis of high school genetics standards: are states keeping pace with modern genetics? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 318–327.
Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening participants' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th–10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655–674.
Eddy, S. L., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Beneath the numbers: a review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020106.
Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 478–492.
Elrod, S. (2007). Genetics concept inventory. http://bioliteracy.colorado.edu/Readings/papersSubmittedPDF/Elrod.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.
ETS. (2015). The Praxis study companion-biology: content knowledge. https://www.ets.org/s/praxis/pdf/5235.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Federer, M. R., Nehm, R. H., & Pearl, D. K. (2016). Examining gender differences in written assessment tasks in biology: a case study of evolutionary explanations. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(1), ar2.
Franke, G., & Bogner, F. X. (2011). Conceptual change in participants’ molecular biology education: tilting at windmills? The Journal of Educational Research, 104(1), 7–18.
Freidenreich, H. B., Duncan, R. G., & Shea, N. (2011). Exploring middle school students’ understanding of three conceptual models in genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2323–2349.
Gericke, N. M., Hagberg, M., dos Santos, V. C., Joaquim, L. M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2014). Conceptual variation or incoherence? Textbook discourse on genes in six countries. Science & Education, 23(2), 381–416.
Gipson, M. H., Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1989). Relationships between formal-operational thought and conceptual difficulties in genetics problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(9), 811–821.
Ha, M., & Nehm, R. H. (2014). Darwin’s difficulties and students’ struggles with trait loss: cognitive-historical parallelisms in evolutionary explanation. Science & Education, 23(5), 1051–1074.
Hartig, J., & Frey, A. (2013). Sind Modelle der Item-Response-Theorie (IRT) das Mittel der Wahl für die Modellierung von Kompetenzen? [Are models of IRT the choice for the modeling of competencies?] Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft [Journal of Educational Science], 16(1), 47–51.
Hickey, D. T., Wolfe, E. W., & Kindfield, A. C. (2000). Assessing learning in a technology-supported genetics environment: evidential and systemic validity issues. Educational Assessment, 6(3), 155–196.
Hinsley, D. A., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). From words to equations: meaning and representation in algebra word problems. Cognitive Processes in Comprehension, 329.
Hott, A. M., Huether, C. A., McInerney, J. D., Christianson, C., Fowler, R., Bender, H., Jenkins, J., Wysocki, A., Markle, G., & Karp, R. (2002). Genetics content in introductory biology courses for non-science majors: theory and practice. Bioscience, 52(11), 1024–1035.
Huppert, J., Lomask, S. M., & Lazarowitz, R. (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: students’ cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 803–821.
International Baccalaureate Organization. (2014). Diploma programme biology guide. Cardiff: Author.
Jamieson, A., & Radick, G. (2013). Putting Mendel in his place: how curriculum reform in genetics and counterfactual history of science can work together. In K. Kampourakis (Ed) The philosophy of biology: A companion for educators (pp. 577–595). Springer: Netherlands.
Jamieson, A., & Radick, G. (2017). Genetic determinism in the genetics curriculum. Science & Education, 1–30.
Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. E. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 542–557). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Kampourakis, K. (2015). Distorting the history of evolutionary thought in conceptual development research. Cognitive Science, 39(4), 833-837.
Kampourakis, K. (2017). Making sense of genes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kampourakis, K. and Nehm, R.H. (2014). History and philosophy of science and student explanations and conceptions. In Matthews, M. (ed.) Handbook of the history and philosophy of science in science and mathematics teaching (pp. 377–400). Springer.
Kargbo, D. B., Hobbs, E. D., & Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children’s beliefs about inherited characteristics. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 137–146.
Kinnear, J. (1983). Identification of misconceptions in genetics and the use of computer simulations in their correction. In H. Helms & J. Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics (pp. 84–92). Ithaca: Cornell University.
Klymkowsky, M. W., Underwood, S., & Garvin-Doxas, K. (2010). The biological concepts instrument (BCI), a diagnostic tool to reveal student thinking.
KMK. (2004). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). [National educational standards in biology for the intermediate leaving examination. Resolution of the standing conference of the ministers of education and cultural affairs]. Munich: Wolters Kluwer.
Knippels, M. C. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108–112.
Krajcik, J. S., Simmons, P. E., & Lunetta, V. N. (1988). A research strategy for the dynamic study of students’ concepts and problem solving strategies using science software. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(2), 147–155.
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association., 47(260), 583–621.
Lauer, S., Momsen, J., Offerdahl, E., Kryjevskaia, M., Christensen, W., & Montplaisir, L. (2013). Stereotyped: investigating gender in introductory science courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(1), 30–38.
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2007). Science education and student diversity: race/ethnicity, language, culture, and socioeconomic status. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education,1 (pp. 171–197). New York: Routledge.
Lewis, J., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: re-visiting students’ understandings of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 195–206.
Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1989). Gender, mathematics, and science. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 17–27.
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.
Mayer, R. (2013). Problem solving. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 769–778). New York: Oxford.
McElhinny, T. L., Dougherty, M. J., Bowling, B. V., & Libarkin, J. C. (2014). The status of genetics curriculum in higher education in the United States: goals and assessment. Science & Education, 23(2), 445–464.
Moll, M. B., & Allen, R. D. (1987). Student difficulties with Mendelian genetics problems. The American Biology Teacher, 49(4), 229–233.
MSW NRW. (2008). Kernlehrplan für das Gymnasium. Sekundarstufe I in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Biologie. [Core curriculum for the gymnasium. Lower secondary level 1 in North Rhine-Westphalia. Biology]. Frechen: Ritterbach.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 237–256.
Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. Bioscience, 57(3), 263–272.
Nehm, R. H., & Ridgway, J. (2011). What do experts and novices “see” in evolutionary problems? Evolution Education and Outreach., 4(4), 666–679.
Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1131–1160.
Nehm, R. H., Beggrow, E. P., Opfer, J. E., & Ha, M. (2012). Reasoning about natural selection: diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS instrument. The American Biology Teacher, 74(2), 92–98.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Opfer, J., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching., 49(6), 744–777.
Pearsall, N. R., Skipper, J. E. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1997). Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: a longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology. Science Education, 81(2), 193–215.
Peng, S. S., Wright, D., & Hill, S. T. (1995). Understanding racial-ethnic differences in secondary school science and mathematics achievement (NCES 95-710). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Nielsen & Lydiche.
Sadler, T. D. (2003). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: the influence of morality and content knowledge. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of South Florida, FL.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93.
Scantlebury, K. (2014). Gender matters. In N. K. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, 2 (pp. 187–203). New York: Routledge.
Scantlebury, K., & Baker, D. (2007). Gender issues in science education: remembering where the difference lies. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, 1 (pp. 31–56). New York: Routledge.
Schroeders, U., Penk, C., Jansen, M., & Pant, H. A. (2013). Geschlechtsbezogene Disparitäten. [Gender-specific disparities]. In H. A. Pant, P. Stanat, U. Schoeders, A. Ropplet, T. Siegele, & C. Pöhlmann (Eds.), IQB-Ländervergleich 2012. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen am Ende der Sekundarstufe I. [IQB-National assessment studies 2012. Competencies at the end of secondary level I in mathematics and science competencies] (pp. 249–274). Münster: Waxmann.
Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Sport Berlin (2006). Rahmenlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe I. Jahrgangsstufe 7–10. Biologie. [Core curriculum for lower secondary level. Grades 7 to 10. Biology.] Berlin.
Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: a snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 449–457.
Shea, N. A., Duncan, R. G., & Stephenson, C. (2015). A tri-part model for genetics literacy: exploring undergraduate student reasoning about authentic genetics dilemmas. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 485–507.
Shepardson, D. P., & Pizzini, E. L. (1994). Gender, achievement, and perception toward science activities. School Science and Mathematics, 94(4), 188–193.
Silver, E. A. (1979). Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 195–210.ibo.
Simmons, P. E., & Lunetta, V. N. (1993). Problem-solving behaviors during a genetics computer simulation: beyond the expert/novice dichotomy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 153–173.
Sirotnik, K., & Wellington, R. (1977). Incidence sampling: an integrated theory for matrix sampling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14(4), 343–399.
Slack, S. J., & Stewart, J. (1990). High school participants’ problem-solving performance on realistic genetics problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(1), 55–67.
Smith, M. U. (1983). A comparative analysis of the performance of experts and novices while solving selected classical genetics problems. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, FL.
Smith, M. U. (1992). Expertise and the organization of knowledge: unexpected differences among genetic counselors, faculty, and students on problem categorization tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 179–205.
Smith, M. U., & Gericke, N. M. (2015). Mendel in the modern classroom. Science & Education, 24(1–2), 151–172.
Smith, M. U., & Good, R. (1984). Problem solving and classical genetics: successful versus unsuccessful performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(9), 895–912.
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., & Knight, J. K. (2008). The genetics concept assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 422–430.
Soyibo, K. (1999). Gender differences in Caribbean participants’ performance on a test of errors in biological labelling. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(1), 75–82.
Stanger-Hall, K. F. (2012). Multiple-choice exams: an obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 294–306.
Stewart, J. (1983). Student problem solving in high school genetics. Science Education, 67(4), 523–540.
Stewart, J. (1988). Potential learning outcomes from solving genetics problems: a typology of problems. Science Education, 72(2), 237–254.
Stewart, J., & Dale, M. (1989). High school students’ understanding of chromosome/gene behavior during meiosis. Science Education, 73(4), 501–521.
Stewart, J., Cartier, J. L., & Passmore, P. M. (2005). Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn (pp. 515–565). Washington D.C: National Research Council.
Todd, A., & Romine, W. L. (2016). Validation of the learning progression-based assessment of modern genetics in a college context. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1673–1698.
Tolman, R. R. (1982). Difficulties in genetics problem solving. American Biology Teacher, 44(9), 525–527.
Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning in genetics using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073–1098.
Van Bavel, J. J., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Brady, W. J., & Reinero, D. A. (2016). Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproductiblity. PNAS, 113(23), 6454–6459.
Ware, E. A., & Gelman, S. A. (2014). You get what you need: an examination of purpose based inheritance reasoning in undergraduates, preschoolers, and biological experts. Cognitive Science, 38(2), 197–243.
Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response models. Psychometrika, 54(3), 427–450.
Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387–398.
Willoughby, S. D., & Metz, A. (2009). Exploring gender differences with different gain calculations in astronomy and biology. American Journal of Physics, 77(7), 651–657.
Wright, B. D. (1984). Despair and hope for educational measurement. Contemporary Education Review, 3(1), 281–288.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. (1979). Best test design. Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.
Wright, C. D., Eddy, S. L., Wenderoth, M. P., Abshire, E., Blankenbiller, M., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Cognitive difficulty and format of exams predicts gender and socioeconomic gaps in exam performance of students in introductory biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(2), ar23.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering participants’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62.