Gender differences in entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship: an empirical analysis
- 1.4k Downloads
This study examines the gender gap in start-up activities to determine whether it is family status or employment status that is responsible for the observed gender gap. We consider independent entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship as two different start-up modes: While intrapreneurship is conducted within an established organization, independent entrepreneurship is solely an independent activity. This study focuses on this fundamental distinction to identify the parameters of our empirical model. Using nationally representative US data, we find that the effects of being a part-time worker on the likelihood of becoming an independent entrepreneur differ across genders. The obtained results suggest similar findings for intrapreneurship, but in opposite directions. Furthermore, our decomposition results suggest that for both entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship, the gender differences in the employment-related variables are more significant than those in the family-related variables in affecting the observed gender gap negatively (for entrepreneurship) or positively (for intrapreneurship).
KeywordsGender gap Entrepreneurship Intrapreneurship
JEL ClassificationsJ15 J16 L26 M13
We thank Rui Baptista (editor-in-charge) and two anonymous referees for invaluable suggestions. We are also grateful to Taehyun Ahn, Andrew Ching, Yuji Honjo, Hiroaki Ino, Masa Kato, Mizuki Komura, Eiji Mangyo, Hitoshi Mitsuhashi, Akira Nagae, Ryo Nakajima, Hikaru Ogawa, Fumio Ohtake, Atsushi Ohyama, Hiroyuki Okamuro, Lars Osberg, Hideo Owan, Kate Rybczynski, Koji Shirai, Taiki Susa, Hidenori Takahashi, Ryuichi Tanaka, Masa Tsubuku, Shintaro Yamaguchi, Weina Zhou, and seminar and conference participants at Chuo, Dalhousie, Hitotsubashi, Keio, Kwansei Gakuin, Sogang, the 42nd Annual Conference of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics, the Kansai Research Group for Econometrics, the Tokyo Labor Economics Workshop, the Kansai Labor Research Group, the 50th Annual Conference of the Canadian Economics Association, and the 2016 Spring Meeting of the Japanese Economic Association for helpful comments and discussions on earlier versions of the paper. Special thanks are also due to Rebecca McBee for helping us construct data used in this paper. Adachi acknowledges Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (23243049) and (C) (15K03425) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Any remaining errors are our own.
- Becker, G. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Cerqueiro, G., & Penas, M. F. (2016). How does personal bankruptcy law affect start-ups? http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2541392.
- Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
- Demsetz, H. (1988). Profit as a functional return: Reconsidering Knight’s views. In H. Demsetz (Ed.), Ownership, Control, and the Firm (pp. 236–247). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Devine, T. J. (1994). Characteristics of self-employed women in the United States. Monthly Labor Review, 117(3), 20–34.Google Scholar
- Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989b). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79(3), 519–535.Google Scholar
- Fairlie, R. W. (2003). An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. Economic Growth Center, Yale University. Discussion Paper No. 873.Google Scholar
- Fairlie, R. W. (2005). An extension of the Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 30(4), 305–316.Google Scholar
- Fan, W., & White, M. J. (2003). Personal bankruptcy and the level of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Law and Economics, 97(4), 808–827.Google Scholar
- Fortin, N., Lemiuex, T., & Firpo, S. (2011). Decomposition methods in economics. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4A, pp. 1–102). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Honig, B. (2001). Learning strategies and resources of entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
- Kacperczyk, A. (2015). Female entrepreneurship and alternative opportunities inside an established firm. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
- Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
- Okamuro, H., & Ikeuchi, K. (2012). Work-life balance and gender differences in self-employment income during the start-up stage in Japan. Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper 260. http://gcoe.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/research/discussion/2008/pdf/gd12-260.pdf.
- Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661.Google Scholar
- Pinchot, G. III (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why you don’t have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, P. D., & Curtin, R. T. (2009). Business creation in the United States: Initial explorations with the PSED II data set. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Schmalz, M. C., Sraer, D. A., & Thesmar, D. (2016). Housing collateral and entrepreneurship. Journal of Finance, . (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Sinning, M., Hahn, M., & Bauer, T. K. (2008). The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition for nonlinear regression models. Stata Journal, 8(4), 480–492.Google Scholar
- Tietz, M. A., & Parker, S. C. (2012). How do intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs differ in their motivation to start a new venture? Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 32(4), Article 4. http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol32/iss4/4