Skip to main content
Log in

Nascent entrepreneurship panel studies: progress and challenges

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economics, history, organizational theory, psychology, public policy, social psychology, sociology, and strategy have all had something to say about business creation. Though the multiple lenses have produced important insights, they have not always defined the phenomenon in terms that can easily be translated from one discipline to another. Operational definitions differ. Convenience samples may suffer from retrospective biases. However, representative samples are expensive to gather. The Panel Studies of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED) are almost alone in examining the actions of entrepreneurs at the time they are organizing their businesses. This Special Issue presents a selected set of refereed papers involving the Norwegian PSED (NPSED) and Swedish PSEDs (SPSED) as well as PSED I and PSED II from the USA. In the context of highlighting the articles in this issue, some insights are offered about the kinds of research accomplishments that have been achieved. Challenges for future research on nascent entrepreneurs are also suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B., & Schjoedt, L. (2009). Entrepreneurial behavior: Its nature, scope, recent research, and agenda for future research. In A. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind: Opening the black box (pp. 327–358). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., Manolova, T. S., & Edelman, L. F. (2008). Properties of emerging organizations: An empirical test. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 547–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, G., & Craig, J. (2009). An investigation of hindsight bias in nascent venture activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. E., & Shaver, K. G. (2009). Social motives in the PSED II. In P. D. Reynolds & R. T. Curtin (Eds.), New firm creation in the United States: Initial explorations with the PSED II data set (pp. 19–34). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2003). Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1165–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. F., & Yli-Renko, H. (2010). The impact of environment and entrepreneurial perceptions on venture creation efforts: Bridging the discovery and creation views of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 833–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid, C., Gordon, S., & Davidsson, P. (2011). Publications based on the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics. Available at: http://www.psed.isr.umich.edu/psed/documentation.

  • Gartner, W. B. (2008). Variations in entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 31, 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., Carter, N. M., & Reynolds, P. D. (Eds.). (2004a). The handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics: The process of business creation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., Carter, N. M., & Reynolds, P. D. (2004b). Foreword. In W. B. Gartner, K. G. Shaver, N. M. Carter, & P. D. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics: The process of business creation (pp. ix–xxiii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B., & Karlsson, T. (2004). Institutional forces and the written business plan. Journal of Management, 30, 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. S., Parker, S. C., & Wijbenga, F. (2006). Nascent entrepreneurship research: Achievements and opportunities. Small Business Economics, 27, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Gartner, W. B. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13, 429–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D., Bosma, N., & Amorós, J. E. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2010 Global report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, J., & Gartner, W. B. (2006). The effects of pre-venture plan timing and perceived environmental uncertainty on the persistence of emerging firms. Small Business Economics, 27, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, J., & Welsch, H. (2008). Patterns of venture gestation process: Exploring the differences between tech and non-tech entrepreneurs. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 19, 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. & Curtin, R. (2009) Business creation in the United States: Entry, startup activities and the launch of new ventures. In C. Moutray (Ed.), The small business economy for data year 2008: report to the president (pp. 165–240). Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy

  • Robb, A., & Reynolds, P. D. (2009). PSED II and the Kauffman firm survey. In P. D. Reynolds & R. T. Curtin (Eds.), New firm creation in the United States: Initial explorations with the PSED II data set (pp. 279–302). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M. (2010). The entrepreneurial group. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Delmar, F. (2004). Planning for the market: Business planning before marketing and the continuation of organizing efforts. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 767–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert, C. (2007). ‘Entrepreneuring’ as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19, 453–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, D., Lempert, R. O., & Hastie, R. (1991). Hindsight and causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39, 29–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H., & Ruef, M. (2004). The myth of the risk-tolerant entrepreneur. Strategic Organization, 2, 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William B. Gartner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gartner, W.B., Shaver, K.G. Nascent entrepreneurship panel studies: progress and challenges. Small Bus Econ 39, 659–665 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9353-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9353-4

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation