Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: a conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198.
Article
Google Scholar
Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Science education in primary schools: is an animation worth a thousand pictures? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 608–620.
Article
Google Scholar
Barak, M., & Hussein-Farraj, R. (2012). Integrating model-based learning and animations for enhancing students’ understanding of proteins structure and function. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 619–636.
Article
Google Scholar
Berney, S., & Bétrancourt, M. (2016). Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 101(2016), 150–167.
Article
Google Scholar
Bravo, M., Cervetti, G., Hiebert, E., & Pearson, P. (2008). From passive to active control of science vocabulary. Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 56, 122–135.
Google Scholar
Cheon, J., Chung, S., Crooks, S. M., Song, J., & Kim, J. (2014). An investigation of the effects of different types of activities during pauses in a segmented instructional animation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 296–306.
Google Scholar
Chu, Y.-C., & Reid, N. (2012). Genetics at school level: addressing the difficulties. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 285–309.
Article
Google Scholar
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Book
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Article
Google Scholar
Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: students’ understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938–959.
Article
Google Scholar
Elmesky, R. (2013). Building capacity in understanding foundational biology concepts: a K-12 learning progression in genetics informed by research on children’s thinking and learning. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1155–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9286-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Furberg, A. (2009). Sociocultural aspects of prompting student reflection in web-based inquiry learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 397–409.
Article
Google Scholar
Furberg, A., Kluge, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2013). Student sense-making with science diagrams in a computer-based setting. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 41–64.
Article
Google Scholar
Gericke, N. M., Hagberg, M., dos Santos, V. C., Joaquim, L. M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2014). Conceptual variation or incoherence? Textbook discourse on genes in six countries. Science & Education, 23(2), 381–416.
Haug, B. S., & Ødegaard, M. (2014). From words to concepts: focusing on word knowledge when teaching for conceptual understanding within an inquiry-based science setting. Research in Science Education, 44(5), 777–800.
Article
Google Scholar
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722–738.
Article
Google Scholar
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
Article
Google Scholar
Jorde, D., Strømme, A., Sørborg, Ø., Erlien, W., & Mork, S. M. (2003). Virtual environments in science. Viten.no. Oslo: ITU.
Karlsson, G. (2010). Animation and grammar in science education: learners’ construal of animated educational software. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), 167–189.
Article
Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2013). What is mode? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 60–75). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Gemballa, S. (2011). Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? Computers & Education, 56(1), 176–187.
Article
Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science. Language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex.
Google Scholar
Lemke, J. (2000). Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.
Article
Google Scholar
Lewis, J., & Kattman, U. (2004). Traits, genes particles and information: re-visiting students’ understanding of genetics. Internal Journal of Science Education, 26, 195–206.
Article
Google Scholar
Lewis, A., Peat, M., & Franklin, S. (2005). Understanding protein synthesis: an interactive card game discussion. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 125–130.
Article
Google Scholar
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Book
Google Scholar
Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2008). Learning from animated diagrams: how are mental models built? In J. H. G. Stapleton & J. Lee (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 266–281). Berlin: Springer.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Marbach-Ad, G. (2001). Attempting to break the code in student comprehension of genetic concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 183–189.
Article
Google Scholar
Marbach-Ad, G., Rotbain, Y., & Stavy, R. (2008). Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 273–292.
Article
Google Scholar
Maria, F., Santos, T. d., & Mortimer, E. F. (2003). How emotions shape the relationship between a chemistry teacher and her high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1095–1110.
Article
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 256–265.
Google Scholar
McElhaney, K. W., Chang, H.-Y., Chiu, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Evidence for effective uses of dynamic visualisations in science curriculum materials. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 49–85.
Article
Google Scholar
Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168.
Article
Google Scholar
Moreno, R. (2007). Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 765–781.
Article
Google Scholar
Mork, S. M. (2006). ICT in science education. Exploring the digital learning materials at viten.no. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Mork, S. M. (2011). An interactive learning environment designed to increase the possibilities for learning and communicating about radioactivity. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(2), 163–177.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
O'day, D. H. (2006). Animated cell biology: a quick and easy method for making effective, high-quality teaching animations. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 5(3), 255–263.
Article
Google Scholar
Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2012). A systematic characterisation of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 781–794.
Article
Google Scholar
Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Making sense of photographs. Science Education, 89(2), 219–241.
Article
Google Scholar
Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., Sangin, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010). Learning from animation enabled by collaboration. Instructional Science, 38(5), 471–485.
Article
Google Scholar
Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2006). Effect of bead and illustrations models on high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 500–529.
Article
Google Scholar
Rundgren, C.-J., Hirsch, R., Chang Rundgren, S.-N., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2012). Students’ communicative resources in relation to their conceptual understanding – the role of non-conventionalized expressions in making sense of visualizations of protein function. Research in Science Education, 42, 891–913.
Article
Google Scholar
Ryoo, K., & Linn, M. C. (2012). Can dynamic visualizations improve middle school students’ understanding of energy in photosynthesis? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(2), 218–243.
Article
Google Scholar
Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Dillenbourg, P., Rebetez, C., & Bétrancourt, M. (2006). Collaborative learning with animated pictures: the role of verbalizations. ICLS ‘06 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences (pp. 667-673).
Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: a fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Shea, N. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2013). From theory to data: the process of refining learning progressions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(1), 7–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Spanjers, I. A., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2010). A theoretical analysis of how segmentation of dynamic visualizations optimizes students’ learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 411–423.
Article
Google Scholar
Spanjers, I. A., Wouters, P., van Gog, T., & van Merrienboer, J. J. (2011). An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 46–52.
Article
Google Scholar
Strømme, T. A., & Furberg, A. (2015). Exploring teacher intervention in the intersection of digital resources, peer collaboration, and instructional design. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21181.
Thörne, K., & Gericke, N. (2014). Teaching genetics in secondary classrooms: a linguistic analysis of teachers’ talk about proteins. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 81–108.
Article
Google Scholar
Treagust, D. F., & Tsui, C.-Y. (Eds.). (2013). Multiple representations in biological education (Vol. 7). New York: Springer.
Google Scholar
Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. E. (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Book
Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to medicated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2008). How to optimize learning from animated models: a review of guidelines based on cognitive load. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 645–675.
Article
Google Scholar
Yarden, H., & Yarden, A. (2010). Learning using dynamic and static visualizations: students’ comprehension, prior knowledge and conceptual status of a biotechnological method. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 375–402.
Article
Google Scholar