Abstract
The interaction of bio–geosphere dates to the formation of first unicellular microbes on earth. However, it is only relatively recently that the complex biological interactions are observed, characterised, and simulated for its use in the domain of geotechnical engineering. Also, many bioinspired approaches have been utilised in computational geotechnics for optimisation and data analysis process. The living phase present in the soil system hold a bearing on the majority of geochemical reactions and assist in modifying its fundamental and engineering behaviour. It necessitates revaluation and rescrutinisation of the conventional theories and formulations in geotechnical engineering, where soil has always been considered as an inert engineering material from biological perspective. To that end, this manuscript provides a critical review on biological approaches used in geotechnical engineering by highlighting the ongoing developments, achievements, and challenges to implement the processes. The review further emphasises the role of biological systems on the alteration of fundamental properties of soils and their consequences on effective stress, strength and stiffness, volume change and conduction properties of soils. Overall, the manuscript provides a basic understanding on the biological intervention in the soil system and the importance of consideration of the fourth phase in the soil system, i.e., the living phase, while describing such interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Biological activities play a major role in soil formation, degradation/weathering, transportation, alteration of soil minerology and morphology through several biogeochemical reactions. However, traditionally in the discipline of geotechnical engineering, soil has always been considered as an inert engineering material from the perspective of biological consequences, up until the last decade. Recently, the importance of biological activities on the rates of geochemical processes and their impact on the engineering behaviour of soils have been emphasised and analysed (Mitchell and Santamarina 2005; Dejong et al. 2013). The resulting multidisciplinary research area devoted towards the effect of biological pathways on the geotechnical behaviour of soils is termed as Biogeotechnics.
The last two decades have witnessed exponentially increasing attention towards numerous biomediated process and their impact and influence on physico–chemical–thermal–electromagnetic properties and strength, stiffness, volume change and conduction behaviour of soils (Dejong et al. 2013; Mishra et al. 2017a, c; Panda et al. 2017; Jain et al. 2021). In addition to biomediation, bioinspiration and biomimicry have also been used to develop solutions for geotechnical infrastructure, monitoring methods and analysis of big data (Simpson and Priest 1993; Das and Basudhar 2006; Muduli et al. 2013; Martinez et al. 2022; Zhong and Tao 2022).
With the volume of literature that’s presently available considering biological mediation and inspiration in geotechnics, need for a state-of-the-art review on the subject is imperative. This is because, there exists only a limited number of textbooks that consider biological perspectives in geotechnics. To that end, this review aims to bridge that gap. In the first part of this review (current paper), we lay emphasis on the theoretical considerations that are key to understanding the genesis, underpinning physio–chemo–biological processes, and the consequences of biomediation and bioinspiration in Geotechnical Engineering. This, then, forms the basis for the second part of the review which speaks to the practical applications of biomediation and the monitoring strategies to capture the effects thereof on soil systems. Through these two articles, we make an attempt at critically reviewing and analysing the progress that has been made in the discipline of geotechnical engineering from the perspective of biological considerations and introducing the same in a comprehensive manner to the geotechnical engineering community.
The following diagram demonstrates the organisation of sections across the two articles and highlights the sections that have been covered under the purview of theoretical consideration and advances in biogeotechnics (Fig. 1).
2 Consideration of biological inspired methods in geotechnical engineering
Technology, materials, designs and solutions can either be inspired from (bioinspired) or replicate (biomimicked) principles of natural and/or biological systems. Given the fact that several organisms in the biogeosphere are far more ancient compared to the human civilisation, it is imperative that they have adopted, developed and evolved several mechanisms that have allowed them to survive. Concepts from these mechanisms have been borrowed and applied in the arena of geotechnics forming the core of bioinspired geotechnics. Bioinspired geotechnics, therefore, refers to the research devoted towards developing solutions with inspirations from natural and/or biological systems for addressing geotechnical and geoenvironmental challenges. This section provides a critical review on this emerging field on three aspects i.e. bioinspired geotechnical infrastructure, bioinspired geotechnical monitoring and bioinspired data analysis.
2.1 Bioinspired geotechnical infrastructure
Most of the biologically inspired approaches in geotechnical engineering are either in the preliminary stages of investigations or still undiscovered. Amongst several approaches, the bioinspired burrowing, excavation, and soil penetration are the most energy efficient (Soga 2011). The stability of soil during excavation by an organism depend on soil type, depth, organism size and soil stiffness, etc. (Dorgan 2015; Ruiz et al. 2015). In cohesive soil, the burrowing can be done by rearrangement and aggregation of soil grains whereas in cohesionless soils, it occurs via sand fluidisation technique (Martinez et al. 2022). Both the mechanisms are used by worms, clams, and plant roots (Trueman 1968; Winter et al. 2012; Sharpe et al. 2015; McInroe et al. 2018) and promise a stable excavation (Martinez et al. 2022).
Ants can be regarded as finest engineers since they use less than 1% energy of machines for excavation of same amount of soil (Soga 2011). Researchers have analysed the mechanisms ants use and the configuration of excavation opening (Frost et al. 2017). Discrete element modelling (DEM) and network analysis simulations concluded that the integrated capillarity, friction, and arching mechanism need to be analysed and manipulated for making efficient underground structures (Espinoza & Santamarina 2010). Also, with X-ray image and simulation experiments researchers are trying to understand the movement of large colonies of ants and their used strategies for stable excavation with potential usage in mining and stable tunnel excavation (Frost et al. 2017; Monaenkova et al. 2015). Frost et al. (2017) concluded that the topographical analysis of ant hill can provide details on soil subsurface conditions.
The roots of plants have a penetration resistance and anchorage capacity which depends upon the plant, soil type and environmental conditions (Martinez et al. 2022). Several studies have been conducted to analyse the mechanism of root growth in soil with potential application in infrastructure construction and excavation (Savioli et al. 2014; Shin and Santamarina 2011; Anselmucci et al. 2021; Del Dottore et al. 2018).
An undulation frequency of 5–10 Hz is most efficient for burial work for fish inspired excavation (McKee et al. 2016). Macdonald et al. (2014) concluded that fishes use two phase pumps to liquefy the soil and go for burial work.
The aforementioned discussion suggests that ants, plant roots and fish inspired strategies can be applied in stable excavations. However, upscaling the bioinspired excavation size from millimetre to kilometre is a major challenge for engineers.
Paws and tongues of certain mammals and birds, and the skin of several mammals and reptiles mobilise the required shear resistance in different direction which can be imitated for potential usage in foundations for wind turbines (Martinez et al. 2021). Several shear tests have been conducted to analyse the frictional resistance between soil and snake surface for application in soil anchors, soil nailing and foundation design (Marvi et al. 2013; Huang & Martinez 2020; Martinez et al. 2018; Martinez & O’Hara 2021).
Hydroskeletons and anchorage of various animals and plant roots inspire to utilise their flexible, longitudinal split shell and passive behaviour for load transfer mechanism (Mallett et al. 2018; Aleali et al. 2020). This helps in increasing the shaft and ultimate capacity compared to conventional pile designing. Several laboratory, centrifuge, field studies and numerical simulations have also been conducted to understand the load transfer mechanism of plant roots which is helpful in designing the foundation and anchorage system more efficiently than conventional methods (Burrall et al. 2020; Mallett et al. 2018; Aleali et al. 2020). Though finite element modelling infers the bioinspired approach is feasible for pile designing, prototype tests need to be undertaken before implementing the strategies in practical applications.
The stability of natural and manmade slopes, transfer of heat and water in soil system are the major challenges to geotechnical engineers (Martinez et al. 2022), which can be mitigated by various bioinspired approaches. The water removal capacity of plants by their roots increases the soil suction and provide hydraulic reinforcement to the soil (Hemmati et al. 2012). Vegetations alter the suction during wetting and drying, soil–water retention curve, which helps in reduction in hydraulic conductivity and enhance slope stability (Ng et al. 2013; Leung et al. 2015; Switala & Wu 2018).
Termite mounds are built in a way such that it is 10–15 °C warmer and cooler during the night and day, respectively (Turner & Soar 2008). The mounds made by termites can be used as an inspiration to comprehend the approaches for design thermally regulated infrastructure with locally available soil (Zachariah et al. 2017; Katariya et al. 2018; Vesala et al. 2019). A detailed review on the bioinspired mechanism for several infrastructures solution has been presented in Martinez et al. (2022). However, the major challenges faced during in situ implementation of bioinspired infrastructure are, (a) analysing the complex nature of biomaterials which also get altered with time and environment, (b) the difference in soil size and depth where the biological interaction works and engineers need to construct, (c) spatial and temporal variability of the proposed solution during upscaling.
2.2 Bioinspired geotechnical monitoring
Considering the spatio-temporal variability of soil properties and influence thereof on structures made with or on top of them, it is important to have a monitoring regime in place to track the health of soil systems over time. To that end, three pillars underpin a typical monitoring regime i.e. (a) sensors/probes that collect data (b) systems that transmit data and (c) approaches to analyse the data. In this section, we will place our attention on data collection and data transmission approaches inspired from biological systems.
Majority of the in-situ testing methods in Geotechnical Engineering rely on inserting a probe into the ground, and then using the resistance of soil to the insertion as an indicator of soil strength (e.g. standard penetration test, cone penetration test, shear vane test etc.). In recent days, several researchers have considered mimicking the locomotive behaviour of organisms such as earthworms to develop site characterisation probes that are capable of self-penetration (Martinez et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2021). They observed that the self-penetration resistance is higher in dense sands compared to silts and clays. Through DEM modelling on non-cohesive soils Chen et al. (2021) observed that the favourable conditions for self-penetration were (a) shorter anchor-tip distances (b) long anchors with high expansion magnitudes and friction coefficients. This innovation has the potential for development of light weight rigs that will allow characterisation of sites with limited accessibilities. A similar self-burrowing device taking inspiration from root growth and fluidisation of granular medium has also been reported in the literature (Naclerio et al. 2018).
Piezoelectric sensors find wide applications in geotechnical engineering (Zeng 2006) due to their versatility to measure changes in several variables such as temperature, pressure, force, and acceleration based on the principles of piezoelectric effect. In fishes, sensory organs called neuromasts are used as pressure sensitive flow detectors. Each neuromast houses a copula that is sensitive to the water motion on the body of the fish. The nerve impulses are then carried via a nerve fibre to the brain of the fish. Similar principle applies to piezoelectric water pressure sensors that respond to changes in water pressure (Tuhtan et al. 2020). Figure 2 demonstrates a piezoelectric sensor for monitoring water pressure and how it derives inspiration from the lateral-line system of fish.
Once the sensor obtains the required data, the next step for monitoring is to transmit this data to a server or a system for visualisation, post processing and analysis. The data transmission system may be wired or wireless, with a continuously increased interest and infrastructure towards supporting the latter. Bioinspiration also assists in design of such communication systems (Atakan et al. 2009). Recently, Zhong and Tao (2022) developed a vibration based underground communication system, where the bioinspiration aspect of the development was hinged to the mechanical wave transmission by subterranean and some surface-dwelling animals through biological tremulation and drumming. They found that the developed system could transmit information to a distance of 80 cm in dry and medium dense sand in the laboratory conditions. The final step of monitoring is linked to analysis of the retrieved data. Bioinspired approaches for data analysis are discussed in the later section of the manuscript.
From the discussion above, it is evident that bioinspiration is a credible source to develop geotechnical monitoring systems that capture the processes of development of sensors and data transfer.
2.3 Bioinspired data analysis
The development of computational geomechanics has closely followed the development in computational mathematics. Biological processes have always inspired scientific thinking. Accordingly, development in mathematics and physics have followed natural phenomena. The Fibonacci number explains the growth of rabbit populations and the golden section ratio explains some human features. In 1936, Alan Turing used biological inspiration to develop a machine named Turing machine, which was the precursor of modern-day computer (Turing 2009). The motivation of nervous system to solve logical calculus by McCulloch and Pitts (McCulloch and Pitts 1943) was the beginning of artificial neural networks (ANN). Though, Rosenblatt (Rosenblatt 1958) encouraged it with hypothetical perceptron, but Minsky and Papert (1969) reported the limitations. Finally, after the proposal of the parallel distributed processing with inspiration from the neural system by Rumelhart et al. (1988), the ANN and its variants were developed to be used different branches of science and engineering.
The development of evolutionary algorithm (EA) took flight in the 1970s when genetic algorithm (GA) was introduced by John Holland in 1975 (Holland 1992). This may be considered the first algorithm to use crossover and recombination in optimisation and sequence modelling. The approaches based on the intelligence of the population gave birth to genotype, genetic code and self-adaptation. In the 1990s, innovative works on nature-inspired algorithms and memory-based metaheuristics took place with published works on ant colony optimisation (ACO) and tabu search (Glover and Laguna 1998). American psychologist James Kennedy along with engineer Russell C. Eberhart came up with the concept of particle swarm optimisation (PSO) (Kennedy 2006) inspired by the swarm intelligence of creatures like fish, birds, and even humans. Initially, the algorithms were focused only on the human brains and cognitive ability, but with time paradigm shifted towards a much wider scope of organisms, processes and phenomena observed. This shift was observed from the development of the harmony search (HS) algorithm (Geem et al. 2001), artificial bee colony (ABC), Firefly algorithm in 2008 (Yang 2010), cuckoo search (CS) algorithm (Yang 2010) and many others. In the subsequent years, a vector-based evolutionary algorithm named differential evolution (DE) was developed.
GA has been used in geotechnical engineering since 1990’s (Simpson and Priest 1993) and at that time there were also attempts for development of ANN modeling to complex geotechnical systems like soil liquefaction, pile foundation etc. to replace the statistical based empirical methods (Goh 1994). To avoid the limitation of ANN as a “black box”, prediction model development with inspiration from genetics through genetic programming (GP) (Koza 1992) and its variants are being used in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based computer programming. This mini review aims at providing a systematic introduction to biologically inspired algorithms, their source of inspiration, their developmental aspects and applications restricted to geotechnical engineering problems and future challenges. The review is divided into two categories: bio-inspired optimisation algorithms and artificial Intelligence based classification/prediction algorithms.
2.3.1 Optimisation techniques
Though the history of optimisation can be traced back to the seventeenth century to the times of Newton and Leibnitz, most of the traditional optimisation methods were developed after the 1940’s for the reconstruction of war devastated world. Nature itself contains a lot of examples of biological phenomena that inspire the new set of optimisation algorithms. Darwin’s theory of survival of the fittest and evolution of the species is the best example of an optimisation process. GA by John Holland in 1975 (Goldberg 1989) is the first bioinspired optimisation tool. Bio-inspired optimisation algorithms can be divided into three groups based on the nature of their biological inspiration. i.e. (a) swarm intelligence algorithms, (b) evolutionary algorithms (EAs) and (c) bacteria foraging algorithms.
2.3.1.1 Swarm intelligence algorithms
The concept of swarm intelligence was proposed by Beni and Wang in the 1990s (Beni and Wang 1993). Global swarm intelligence is developed by the interaction of individual agents, and there is no global control system to dictate an individual’s behaviour (Kennedy 2006). As depicted in Fig. 3, these algorithms take motivation from animals, insects, or other biological species’ behaviour. Some examples of swarm intelligence are ant colonies, bee colonies, bacteria growth, bird flocking, fish schooling, cuckoo search and firefly techniques (Kumar and Kumar 2021).
Taking inspiration from the concept of stigmergy, a term crossed by Grass in 1992, ant colony optimization (ACO) method was introduced by Dorigo in 1992. The type of colony-level behaviour used by ants to find the optimal path between their nest and food source is the source of the ACO optimisation algorithm. A schematic representation of the ACO mechanism is shown in Fig. 3 where all the possible paths are crawled by the ants randomly at the start and an optimal path is discovered with time.
Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) is another swarm optimisation algorithm loosely inspired by the social stigma of bird flocking. The mechanism of PSO can be understood by the virtual image of a bird flock searching for insects as their food (Kennedy 2006). The bird with a greater number of insects in its neighbourhood cries louder in comparison to a bird with a lesser number of insects in its neighbourhood. PSO consist of a particle group that collectively moves over the search space to reach a global optimum (Fig. 3b) (Floreano and Mattiussi 2008).
Cuckoos lay their eggs in the nests of other species/host birds and may also remove eggs of that species. As cuckoos’ eggs hatch earlier than host birds’ eggs, they increase their share of food. Figure 3c shows the mechanism of transfer of cuckoo eggs with good fitness value (good solutions) to the next generation and the cuckoo search algorithm (CS) (Yang 2010).
The bee colony optimization (BCO) was originally introduced by Pham et al. (2013) is inspired by the food foraging behavior of the colonies of honeybees. For a particular problem, the bee algorithm thinks about all its candidate solutions as food sources, similar to flowers for bees. The solution space is searched with the help of a population of n number of agents mimicking bees. The profitability of a solution is evaluated by agents (bees) every time they visit a solution (flower). A process flow diagram of fitness-based selection of BCO is shown in Fig. 3d, where current and candidate solution space are explored by bees based on the fitness value.
Intelligent water drops (IWD) algorithm is a swarm-based algorithm for optimisation problems. The motivation is based on gravitational pull of water drop in a river that flows in a straight line (shortest path) towards the lake or the ocean if no barrier is present (Al Deeb et al. 2014). In contrast, water drops keep modifying the real path to avoid obstruction and approach more towards the ideal path (Hosseini 2007).
The gravitational search algorithm (GSA) is based on the gravity law of Newton which states that every existing particle attracts other existing particles with a pull that is directly proportional to the masses of particle and inversely proportional to the square of the separation between them (Rashedi et al. 2009). The exploitation of the algorithm is guaranteed by the slow movement of heavy mass (good solution) in comparison to lighter mass (bad solution) (Fig. 3e) (Rashedi et al. 2009).
In coral colonies, these corals grow and reproduce by choking out neighbouring corals for space. This fight for survival and some unique characteristics of their reproduction is the inspiration for development of Coral reef optimisation algorithm (CRO) (Salcedo-Sanz et al. 2014).
The beautiful sight of sort and rhythmic flashes of light of the fireflies is the motivation for fire fly algorithm (FA). The brighter lights attract more mating partners and more prays (Fig. 3f) and the algorithm is based on this flashing characteristics (Kumar and Kumar 2021).
2.3.1.2 Evolutionary algorithms (EAs)
The EAs are population-based approach with a number of potential trial solutions and the motivation is survival of the fittest. These solutions go through various alterations with terminologies; reproduction, crossover and mutation, derived from genetics. Two most widely used EAs are genetic algorithms (GA) and differential evolution (DE).
GA uses directed random searches for the location of optimal solutions in difficult terrains of solutions. GA mimics the evolution process of nature to find a set of the solution then it alters the pool of solutions by using the biological operations of mutation, crossover, and selection makes it a truly bio-inspired algorithm. The concept of GA, as represented in Fig. 3g is based on the idea that a specie (solution) which is having more chances of survival (like giraffe in this case, as it can procure food even from higher branches of trees) will get transferred to next generation of population.
2.3.1.3 Bacteria foraging algorithms
DE works with the same steps as a standard EA but individual trial solutions are referred to as genomes, unlike traditional EAs, the objective space in DE is explored based on the difference of genomes (Das and Suganthan 2010). Bacterial Foraging optimisation algorithm (BFO).
The foraging strategy is the method of locating food, its handling and at the end ingesting it. Natural selection favours the growth of animals with good foraging strategies. Such evolutionary theories are the motivation towards exploration of the possibility of modelling these foraging strategies as optimisation processes. Passino introduced Bacterial foraging optimisation algorithm (BFO) that mimics the foraging behaviour of E. coli bacterium (the one present in our stomach).
Some other bioinspired optimisation algorithms, which are based on bio-inspiration are Tabu search (TS), and Runner-root algorithm (RRA). The meaning of ‘Tabu’ is related to the sacred things which cannot be touched. It keeps a short-term memory of several set of solutions. In TS cycling is prevented by maintaining a list of tabu solution, which are forbidden to be touched (just like the meaning of name Tabu) (Fig. 3i). The basic concept of this kind of search is to restrict moves that wants to revisit already searched spaces (Glover and Laguna 1998). The RRA is inspired by the runners and roots of a plants like strawberry and spider in nature. These plants propagate through the runners in the environment, at the same time they develop their root hairs to locally search for food (water and Minerals) for their development. The unique nature of the RRA comes from the fact that it performs global search to reach an optimal solution in all its iterations, apart from that, it also performs local search, only in the condition when global search fails to improve the cost function value (Merrikh-Bayat 2015).
The list of some bio inspired algorithms with basic principles and their applications in geotechnical engineering in a comprehensive manner is presented in Table 1.
2.3.2 Artificial intelligence based classification/prediction/clustering algorithms
2.3.2.1 Neural network (NN)
The idea of NN was first introduced by McCulloch and Pitts in 1943 and finally developed by Rumelhart et al. (1988). The NN is a collection of nodes and units which are connected, these nodes are artificial neurons which mimic the neuron in the biological brain. As described in Fig. 3j, the neural network consists of connections that transmit signals to other neurons, just like the working of synapses in brains. These signals are transferred to other connected neurons, and the output computation at each neuron is done using the non-linear function of the summation of their inputs. These connections are mimics of axons. These neurons and edges have some weights attached to them which change as learning proceeds, these weights are responsible for increase and decrease of signal strength at a connection. There are various types of NN based on the type of architecture.
2.3.2.2 Genetic programming (GP)
Genetic programming (GP) is a technique in which an initial unfit population is evolved with the application of operations that are analogous to natural processes of genetics (Koza 1992). These operations involve selection of the fittest population for performing crossover (reproduction) and mutation. Some members are directly promoted to the next generation, called elitism. The basic mutation and crossover operations are the primary elements of GP (Fig. 3h. The other variants of GP are Multigene genetic programming (MGGP) (Fig. 3k), linear genetic programming (LGP) etc.
2.3.2.3 Other evolutionary prediction models
The Evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) constructs symbolic models by utilizing a two-stage technique which involves structural identification and estimation of parameters (Rezania et al. 2010). The evolutionary programming (EP) (Fogel 2000) is based on the process that can generate population of increasing intellect over time. The artificial immune system (AIS), introduced by Jeffrey O. Kephart in 1994, is a rule based computationally intelligent system and is modeled based on the characteristics of memory and learning for the use in problem solving.
The applications aspects and comprehensive review of AI method can be found in Das (2013) and (Ebid 2021) and a brief review is presented in Table 2.
3 Role of biological activities on the fundamental properties of geomaterials
Soils exhibit a great degree of spatio-temporal variability pertaining to grain size, shape, mineralogical and chemical composition that further influences their engineering behaviour. Geotechnical engineers often need to evaluate the properties of the soil mass for its usage in a particular design or construction. Analysing these soil properties needs a basic understanding of the characteristics of the material and the processes it has undergone to reach its present state (Mitchell and Soga 2005). This demands identification and appreciation of the geochemical process involved in a soil system since its genesis. The abundance of biomass on the soil surface and subsurface assist to realise the contribution of microorganisms, plants, and their biological activity on the alteration and acceleration of geochemical reaction (Mitchell and Santamarina 2005); the biogeochemical reactions accelerate major nutrient movements and alter the soil behaviour to a great degree.
Various biogeochemical process involved in the ecosystem can be divided into two major categories i.e., gaseous and sedimentary cycles. The gaseous cycles include carbon, oxygen, nitrogen and water cycles, whereas sedimentary cycles involves sulphur, phosphorus and rock cycles.
In oxygen and carbon cycle, not only plants but also the photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria) forms cellular carbon and, molecular oxygen from water and carbon dioxide (Mitchell and Santamarina, 2005). These microbes alter the pH of pore water, due to formation of carbonates. Also, they assist in soil weathering. Various soil microbes undergo different metabolic processes and help in nitrogen fixation, nitrification and denitrification. These three mechanisms are the major components in nitrogen cycle where nitrogen converts to different forms present in soil. Soil micobes partake in oxidation and reduction and help transfer the nutrients in different forms that further alters the soil composition. For example, microbes play an important role in sulfate oxidation, sulfide reduction and iron oxidation, that ultimately change the soil behaviour. A detailed diagram of involvement of microorganisms on nutrient movement/cycle in ecosystem is presented in the Fig. 4.
The change in the chemical composition, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and surface characteristics of soils are usually the chemical properties of interest. Some of the key soil physical properties include grain size, shape and specific gravity. Biological activities alter these chemical and physical properties via influencing and accelerating the rock and soil weathering, erosion, transportation, and deposition process.
Biological weathering is one of the important geochemical processes during which the geomaterial undergoes alteration in its size, shape, and composition. Biological weathering includes mineral dissolution and breakdown/degradation of soil particles due to the growth, metabolic activity and degradation of various plants, a wide variety of microorganism, and other organisms. Among them, microbial weathering is a complex interaction of the diverse microbial species present in soils, rocks and minerals. The common approaches used to comprehend the microbial weathering is either investigating the weathering process by a single microbial species/ defined mixed microbial culture or by examining the microbial activity for a particular rock mineral (Kelly et al. 2016). Several laboratory and field studies have been carried out to investigate different microbial weathering mechanisms (Gadd 2010). Though microbial weathering process is often considered from the perspective of fundamental microbiology or geology, identifying and analysing individual mechanism and the weathering process in terms of engineering perspective is necessary to harness it in other field of applications such as bioleaching and bioremediation. For instance, Vera et al. (2013) have excellently reviewed the progress of bioleaching by understanding the bacterial metal iron sulphide oxidation process.
The basic microbial metabolic processes which directly alter soil physio–chemical properties and contribute to weathering are: Metal chelation, pH alteration, oxidation and reduction.
3.1 Metal chelation
Metal chelation forms new complexes via bonding the ligands with metal ions present in a system. The production of organic acid due to various microbial metabolic activities accelerate the dissolution of various minerals from soil and rock (Saad et al. 2017). This organic acid also acts as a ligand, binding the released heavy metals and precipitating soluble or insoluble complex mineral (Konhauser 2006). The precipitation of new mineral decreases the saturation state of metal in solution and assists in release of more metals from the soil mineral. Experiments show that production of 3,4-Dihydroxybezoic acid (DHBA) via microbial activities can dissolute numerous feldspar minerals. During this process, the acid dissolutes a wide range of metal cations and form various complexes. The microbial activities produce siderophores, having a higher metal affinity compared to organic acids, that bind with various metals such as iron, copper, manganese, nickel, etc. and form respective products (Konhauser 2006). The dissolution of other complex metals and ligand-based mineral formation via various microorganisms are still being researched (Saad et al. 2017).
To summarise, microbial metal chelation assists in the processes of weathering, disintegration and formation of new mineral which further impacts the grain size, surface area, surface charge, density, and surface area of soils. However, not many studies have been conducted to relate the effect of weathering on soil size and nature of soil, which remains as a scope for future research.
3.2 pH alteration
The microbial growth and metabolic processes either increase or decrease the surrounding pH which has a bearing on the weathering process (Konhauser 2006). Most of the microbial community produce organic acid as their primary and secondary metabolic product by oxidising the carbon source to acid such as amino acid, lactic acid and citrate (Willey et al. 2008). Release of these acids influence the dissolution, disintegration of rock and alter the pH of the soil system. Oxalic acid, one of the widely encountered organic acid produced by fungi act as a weathering agent in the calcareous soil (Thorley et al. 2015). Not only the organic acid production, but also the release of carbon dioxide during microbial respiration also interacts with water to produce carbonic acid. Carbonic acid is hinged to various mineral weathering process including dissolution of carbonates (Thorley et al. 2015).
The production of various acids helps to split the Si–O–Si and Al–O–Si bonds, weakens the minerals in soil matrix and accelerates the mineral dissolution. This acidolysis process is one of the most significant microbial weathering processes, since acids also help to displace other metal cations such as iron, aluminium, potassium, etc. from the aluminosilicate minerals and release into the system solution (Gadd 2010). The pH mediated and ligand-based weathering due to acid production can occur simultaneously. However, their impact on mineral dissolution rate varies with rock type and concentration of acid production (Gadd 2010). The production of various inorganic acids (such as sulfuric and nitric acid) and acidic/basic exopolymeric substances (EPS) due to microbial redox reactions also change the pH of the surrounding soil system. Various acidic EPS have the ability to weather feldspar in a 50 to 100-fold faster than abiotic weathering (Welch et al. 1999). The EPS molecules also act as ligands and bind the silicon and metals leached from the soil or rock mineral. Pertaining to pH increase, photosynthetic microbes produce carbonate anions and raise the pH of soil–solution mixture which help to leach various elements such as Ca, Mg, Si and K from the soil or the parent rock. Hence, it leads to soil and rock weathering process by raising the pH (Olsson-Francis et al. 2012).
The high generation rate, mutation, faster adaptability to the new ecosystem enables the survival of microbes in extreme soil pH conditions (Mitchell and Santamarina 2005; Willey et al. 2008). Understanding the prevailing biochemical processes associated with pH alteration assists to simulate the same for modifying the soil behaviour for engineering applications. Panda et al. (2017) isolated some native microbes from bauxite residue (red mud) and fed them with dairy waste to reduce the alkalinity of red mud from the pH value of 11.5 to 7. The bio-neutralised red mud was further characterised pertaining to its geotechnical properties for its efficient utilisation in embankment material. Levett et al. (2022) analysed the natural biogeochemical process of formation of natural iron cement and utilised the same for stabilising, remediating the iron ore mining area and doing revegetation.
3.3 Oxidation and reduction
Microorganisms need energy to sustain life like any other lifeform. The chemotrophs gather energy during the oxidation process where a compound loses energy by providing its electron to an electron receiver. During this, oxidation–reduction process occurs simultaneously and facilitate the weathering process of soil.
The sulfate oxidation and sulfide reduction which mostly occurs in combination with iron reduction and oxidation has been studied thoroughly by considering its effect on soil properties, weathering, acid mine drainage (Chapelle 2001; Mitchell and Santamarina 2005). In anaerobic condition, the presence of wide range of sulfate reducing microbes reduce sulfate to sulfide. In aerobic condition, the sulfide oxidising microbes helps to convert sulfate (Chapelle 2001). Similarly, the iron is present in the subsurface in the form of ferrous or ferric state and it undergoes oxidation reduction process via various iron reducing microbes such as Thiobacillus species. In the combined iron and sulfur oxidation i.e., during pyrite oxidation, the Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans produce oxidised sulfur compounds such as thiosulfate and sulfuric acid. This acid production is the main source of acid mine drainage and influence the weathering process significantly. Li et al. (2014) showed the sulfuric acid production during pyrite oxidation reduced a bulk rock pH to acidic (pH = 2.5) from neutral (pH ~ 7). The microbial redox reaction alters the pH and the pH also influence the kinetics of redox reaction (Hedrich et al. 2011). Though the pyrite oxidation occurs in abiotic conditions, the microbial oxidation increases its rate 10–20 times.
Iron oxidation combined with pyrite weathering is one of the examples of geological weathering. Similarly, several metallic and non-metallic elements such as iron, manganese, copper, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous undergo oxidation–reduction process via different microbial communities and helps in weathering of minerals (Gadd 2010). Different strains of Pseudomonas putida, Bacillus subtilis are found in wide geological environments which reduce manganese from rhodochrosite (MnCO3) and form birnessite (MnO2) (Carmichael et al. 2013). The oxidation of organic matter also occurs via various microbes to gather energy that helps in weathering of organic material present in soil, rocks, coal, shales (Berlendis et al. 2014).
The biogeochemical cycles of weathering can occur in the environment as an isolated process or an interconnected process involving diverse microbial metabolic process by supporting one another’s growth. Both microbially induced (i.e. directly contributing to weathering) and microbially influenced (i.e. influencing abiotic weathering) significantly change the physical and chemical behaviour of soil from microscopic level to macroscopic scale.
Many of the weathering processes also contribute to the erosion of soil and rock up to a certain extent. For example, EPS and biopolymers affect the rate of erosion. Besides, some pure bio-erosive processes also exist such as the fungal hyphae growth that has the ability of splitting the mineral plane (Hutchens 2009). These bio-erosive processes break the geomaterials altering the soil size and shape but does not affect its chemical properties much.
Although microbes are involved in various geochemical cycles, the occurrence of these processes is dependent on the survivability of microbes in the soil pores (Mitchell and Santamarina 2005). Bacteria need a pore size greater than 4 µm, whereas fungi and protozoa need a size greater than 6 µm. Some of the microbes live in colonies and/or symbiotic communities with other species, which require more space to survive and undergo their chemical process. In this regard, coarse-grained soils provide enough pore space in which bacteria can adhere to the mineral surface via forming colonies or biofilms and EPS. These EPS and biofilms accelerate many chemical reactions and help in weathering and erosion processes. Though the effect of the microbial process on the formation of coarse-grained soil is minimal, various bioactivities occur and influence the surface properties and interparticle contacts which need a comprehensive study. In fine-grained soil, microbial activities play an important role in the formation since it facilitates nucleation and crystal growth (Mitchell and Santamarina 2005). A comprehensive study on bio-related sediment formation, the involved mechanism, time, and size scales is presented in Mitchell and Santamarina (2005).
The above discussion highlights the involvement of microorganisms and the influences of their biochemical process in altering the basic physico–chemical properties of soil that has a consequential impact on the engineering behaviour of soils. Although various biomediated process are being used in recent days to alter the engineering behaviour of soil, only a few studies emphasise the effect of the biochemical process on the fundamental properties of soils. An in depth understanding of soil-microbe interaction in different environmental conditions could provide more knowledge on the same and can further assist in engineering the Biomediated pathways to generate solutions for geoengineering challenges. An example of utilising a bioprocess in altering the soil physical i.e. consistency behaviour is by utilising microbes or plant-based biopolymers. Studies have shown that the addition of biopolymers alter liquid limit of soils since the process imparts a viscosity to the pore fluid. In case of expansive clay minerals (e.g. montmorillonite) the addition of xanthan gum reduces the liquid limit by changing the surface charge and particle aggregation (Chang et al. 2020).
4 Consideration of biological actuation and influence on geotechnical behaviour
The evolution of geotechnical engineering as a subject started with consideration of physical laws governing soil behaviour, which was then extended to include chemical influences. Consideration of biological actuation and influence in the framework of geotechnical engineering is a relatively recent development. While such considerations are often described in qualitative terms, limited attempts have been made for development of theoretical formulations in geotechnical engineering to incorporate these considerations. This section summarises such considerations, underlying mechanisms and then proposes several theoretical formulations pertaining to stress, strength, volume change and conduction phenomena in soils that integrate the biological effects on the soil system.
4.1 Total/effective stress
Development of the concept of effective stress dates back to eighteenth century with initial descriptions by Charles Lyell, followed by works from Boussinesq, Reynolds, Föppl and Rudeloff, and Fillunger (de Boer and Ehlers 1990). de Boer and Ehler (1990) report that several of Fillunger’s work has also supported the development of the effective stress principle. They write,
“It is difficult to believe that von Terzaghi should be the only one who discovered the idea of effective stress, if one considers Fillunger’s total work on the mechanical behaviour of porous media, since Fillunger (1913) had already stated in his first study on the theory of water-filled porous media that the pore water pressure has no influence on the strength of the solid skeleton….His valuable work on the consolidation problem (Fillunger 1936) in 1936, which contains the basic ideas of porous media theory, shows that he had fully understood the “principle of effective stress”….”
Largely the Geotechnical community accepts that Terzaghi (1936) formulated the concept of effective stress for saturated soils. According to him the “total principal stress” consists of two components i.e. (a) “neutral stress” which acts on soil solid and water in all direction with equal intensity having no impacts on volume change, and (b) an excess over the neutral stress called “effective principal stress” that acts solely on the solid phase and is responsible for all measurable effects due to change of stress on soil. Mathematically,
where σ′ is the effective stress, σ is the total stress, and uw is the pore water pressure.
It was not until recently (Andrade et al. 2022) that a direct measurement of Terzaghi’s effective stress for saturated soils on a limiting case was demonstrated using a hybrid optical–mechanical method.
The concept of effective stress for unsaturated soils is relatively complicated. Two approaches exist in the literature, each having their own merit and shortcomings. These are, (a) considering a single effective stress combining net stress and matric suction (Bishop 1959), and (b) considering net stress and matric suction as independent stress state variables (Fredlund and Morgenstern 1977).
The formulation by Bishop (1959) is stated in Eq. 2.
where ua is the pore air pressure, ua − uw is the matric suction and χ is the effective stress parameter. For water saturated conditions, χ assumes the value of 1 reducing Eq. 2 (Bishop’s Equation) to Eq. 1 (Terzaghi’s Equation). For dry conditions, χ assumes the value of 0. For partial saturation, χ is a function of degree of saturation. A couple of critics to Bishop’s formulation of effective stress includes its inability to explain collapse phenomenon in partially saturated soils during wetting (Jennings and Burland 1962) and lack of a unique relationship between χ and the degree of saturation (Khalili et al. 2004). To address this, Fredlund and Morgenstern (1977) suggested treating σ − ua and ua − uw as two independent stress variables and then introducing independent set of material properties for each stress variable. One of the critics to this approach is its inability to account for hydraulic hysteresis on mechanical stress paths due to separation of mechanical stress from hydraulic stress (Nuth and Laloui 2008). Khalili et al. (2004) pointed out that combining a macroscopic (σ − ua) and a microscopic (ua − uw) stress variable is not the usual approach in continuum mechanics.
An inherent assumption in the aforementioned two formulations for effective stress is that the suction is induced solely by capillarity. This is not entirely valid, especially at low moisture contents, where adsorption also contributes to suction and plays a role in soil water retention (Mishra et al. 2021). Zhang and Lu (2020) defined a unified effective stress equation (Eq. 3) considering both capillarity and adsorption.
where σ′ij is the effective stress tensor, δij is the Kronecker delta, σs(w) is the suction stress defined as the summation of components due to capillarity (σscap(w)) and adsorption (σsads(w)). σ, σscap and σsads are all reliant on gravimetric moisture content (w).
Salinity of the pore fluid in a soil system generates osmotic suction (Mishra et al. 2019). It has been demonstrated that osmotic suction affects engineering behaviour of clayey soils (Zhang et al. 2020). Rao and Thyagaraj (2007) suggested the following Eq. that incorporates effects of osmotic suction in total stress when inundating compacted clays with saline solutions.
where \({\pi }_{F}\) and \({\pi }_{0}\) are final and initial osmotic suctions of pore fluid. \({\alpha }_{o}\) is a parameter that varies between 0 and 1.
Miller (1996) argued that osmotic suction (π) should be treated as an independent stress state variable, therefore, requiring three independent stress variables (σ − ua, ua − uw, π) to discuss engineering behaviour of partially saturated soils with saline pore fluid.
The aforementioned equations for effective stress are for two/three phase idealisation of soil without considering presence of or effect of biological pathways. How microbial presence and interactions alter physico–chemical properties of soils have been discussed in details in the preceding section. Such interactions not only modify the volume of pore space but also load–deformation response of soils. This necessitates consideration of the presence and metabolic pathways of biological systems on effective stress of soils.
The presence of microorganisms alters overall gradation of the soil system since the size of microorganisms varies from silt to clay size particles (Willey et al. 2008). This leads to alteration in the pore size of the soil system by filling the voids (similar to mixing clay size particles in a coarse–grained soil system since many microbes and clay particles are of similar size). Microbes not only densify the soil mass, but their cell wall can also handle some amount of external mechanical stress (Mueller and Levin 2020) extending to the orders of MPa (Considine et al. 2008; Hazael et al. 2016). The quantity of stress that can be carried by the microbes depends on the number of microbes present, cell wall structure, compositions, plasticity, and rigidity (Garcia-Rubio et al. 2020). Therefore, a soil system “having” microbes (read as “considering the presence of microbes”) and without will carry loads differently, with the generated effective stress and pore water pressure varying in each case. This is an area that is open for research, and it expected that fundamental experiments and numerical modelling will add value to the current state of understanding.
Traditionally, the three phased idealisation of soil considers it to be comprised of soil solids, air and pore liquid. However, the consideration of additional phases to emphasise the relative importance and distinct properties of the new phase in the soil system is not unconventional. For example, (a) salts are considered as the additional fourth phase for marine soils (Noorany 1984), (b) a further distinction in the water phase (i.e., free water and bound water) is made while discussing about dielectric properties of soil (Mishra 2020), (c) the contractile skin (read as “air–water interface”) is considered as a fourth phase in the context of unsaturated soils (Fredlund and Rahardjo 1993), with the requirement that it is construed to be a part of the water phase from the perspective of mass–volume relationships, but an as independent phase while discussing stress state of the soil. Our proposition of using the fourth phase as the “living phase” refers to the presence and effect of microbes along with the biomediated pathways on the engineering response of the soil system. A generalised theory may require that in addition to the three phases (solid, liquid, air), several additional/new phases have to be considered together; e.g., for unsaturated marine soils (salts and contractile skin as two additional phases) or for unsaturated soils with biomediation (contractile skin and living phase as two additional phases). However, in the context of this manuscript, we stick to a four phased idealisation where the “living phase” is considered as the only additional phase to highlight the contribution of this additional phase in particular. In the context of this framework, the other phases may exist while describing the phenomenological response of the system, but are considered to be merged with their parent phases in the idealisation (e.g., salts and organics in the soils are in the solid phase, contractile skin as the air–water interface). In the sections that follow, we will discuss how the additional “living phase” contributes to strength–flow–deformation behaviour of soil, and thereby advocating in favour of its consideration while describing engineering behaviour of soils.
Microbes undergo several metabolic processes, increase their population, and alter their properties to sustain in a porous media (Willey et al. 2008). They secrete adhesive (exopolysaccharides) and have several appendages (flagella, pili) to sustain in the liquid solid interface (Dunne 2002). These adhesive viscous structures behave differently under different environmental stress to initiate and maintain a contact or affinity to the heterogeneous solid surface (Flemming and Wingender 2010; Persat et al. 2015). Furthermore, these adhesive compounds including exopolysaccharides, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), exoproteins, and extracellular DNA (eDNA) encase the microbial cells to form a slimy aggregate called biofilms (Flemming et al. 2016). The composition and structure of biofilms vary drastically with type of microbes and environmental conditions that makes it challenging to quantify its response upon load application. Biofilm exhibit viscoelasticity, a time-dependent response upon application of external stress (Charlton et al. 2019). The quantifiable viscoelastic property can be correlated with the composition and structure of the biofilm (Persat et al. 2015; Peterson et al. 2015; Charlton et al. 2019). Peterson et al. (2015) have used spring and dashpot model to predict the viscoelastic behaviour of subjected to mechanical loads. Clearly, the above mechanisms alter the pore fluid properties with expected changes in the pore water pressure, soil–fluid interaction and effective stress in a soil mass. Again, we will stress here that fundamental experiments and numerical modelling are needed to understand these interactions better.
Inspired from the biofilms, synthetic biopolymers have been utilised to modify the engineering behaviour of soil system. These biopolymers can be plant based or microorganism or animal derived polymers (Fatehi et al. 2021). Though these biopolymers show adhesive and viscoelastic properties, the adhesion mechanism differs with the soil type (Chang et al. 2015; Mahamaya et al. 2021). In sand, the biopolymer coats the sand grains and forms a strong adhesive film which bridges the sand grains. Desaturation (evaporation of water) further increases the bonding by moving the grains close to each other (Fatehi et al. 2021; Chang et al. 2020). These coatings by the biopolymers increase the area of contact between the grains and reduce the void space having a direct bearing on the effective stress of the soil system. Studies have been conducted to measure the effect of external load on the biopolymer treated sand in terms of liquid limit, strength, erosion resistance, etc. (Mahamaya et al. 2021; Smitha and Sachan 2016; Judge et al. 2022). But not much work has been done to corelate the alteration in the pore fluid properties and area of contact with the effective stress and pore water pressure measurement. In clays, the adhesion mechanism of biopolymer occurs due to the surface charge of clays that varies with the type of clay mineral. The level of interaction of biopolymer and clay depends upon the interlayer bonding of clay, cation exchange capacity of clay, surface charge of both clay and biopolymer (Fatehi et al. 2021). In general, biopolymer treatment has a greater efficiency when treated for clay compared to sand (Chang et al. 2015) due to stronger interparticle connection.
Microbes undergo several metabolic pathways and induce various organic and inorganic substances around the cell wall. Biofilms or biopolymers are the organic substance generated. Similarly, the inorganic materials include precipitation of several kind of minerals known as biominerals. Till date, more than sixty biominerals are discovered which can be synthesised via various microbes (Dhami et al. 2013). Among various biominerals, microbially induced calcium carbonate (MICP) has gained immense importance in geotechnics for various application such as improving strength and stiffness, reducing conductivity and liquefaction potential, carbon sequestration, etc. (Dhami et al. 2013). In the MICP process, the calcium carbonate biomineral precipitates in the soil voids and links the soil particles by making an effective bridge which alters the engineering behaviour of the treated soil (Mujah et al. 2017). The precipitated biomineral increases the area of contact by linkage with potential effects on stress carrying capacity of the grains. However, the rate of influence is highly dependent on the amount of biomineral precipitated and relative size of soil pores and biomineral (Dhami et al. 2013; Mujah et al. 2019). Interestingly, the amount and relative size are also influenced by the number of treatments, concentration of biomass and chemicals present, and other environmental conditions. The influence on the pore water pressure of MICP treated soils also vary with the soil type and its condition (Montoya and Dejong 2015; Zamani and Montoya 2015, 2019). For instance, in MICP treated loose sand, excess negative pore pressure is generated, and dilative tendencies was observed like dense sand (Zamani and Montoya 2015, 2019). In sand with varying silt content, MICP treatment mostly decreases the excess negative pore water pressure generated (Zamani and Montoya 2015). However, the change in pore pressure mostly depends on the level of cementation (Montoya and Dejong 2015; Cui et al. 2017).
Microbial processes also produce different type of gases such as methane (CH4), nitrogen (N2), hydrogen sulphide (H2S), and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the natural soil, landfills, and other contaminated soil. Since most gases are soluble and not inert, either they get solubilised and cannot help in enhancing the mechanical properties of soil. But, the chemically inert and non-soluble nitrogen biogas has been applied for the mitigation of both static and earthquake induced liquefaction potential by desaturating the saturated sand (Peng et al. 2021; O’Donnell et al. 2017). The nitrogen gas is produced in biological nitrification process from nitrate and nitrite via denitrifying bacteria. The rate of gas generation depends on the nutrient availability, atmospheric condition, and type of sand, which further influences the rate of change in pore water pressure (Rebata-Landa and Santamarina 2012). Literature reveals that under static and dynamic loading, there is a decrease in the pore water pressure due to biogas production, that assists in mitigating liquefaction. However, generation of large amount of gas can provide an instability which needs to be accounted for by providing adequate amount of nutrient. Various theoretical and numerical model have been presented to measure the saturation, pore water pressure changes and mechanical response due to biogas production and its potential applications (O’Donnell et al. 2016; Hall et al. 2018; O’Donnell et al. 2019).
Considering the above discussion, and accounting for the fourth phase in a soil system that represents a living phase encompassing the biological agents, pathways and their effects on soil system, the following generalised equation for effective stress may be proposed.
where \({\Psi }_{lm}\) is the difference is the component of total stress that originates from biomediation. ν is a parameter varying between 0 and 1. ν assumes a value of 0 in an idealised case where there is no biological influence on the soil system and is a function of the volumetric living/bio mater content (θlm) as defined in the four-phase idealisation of the soil system (Mishra et. al. 2017a). The upper limit 1 is reserved for a condition where the soil system reaches a state where no further contributions to effective stress is expected irrespective of any further increase in the volume and influences from the biological considerations.
4.2 Strength and stiffness
Shear strength of soils (τ) is one of the key parameters routinely used in geotechnical design. There exist several constitutive relations to describe shear strength of soils of which Mohr Coulomb (MC) equation is the widely used one. It correlates the developed shear stress on a soil mass to the applied stress through two material properties i.e. cohesion (c) and angle of internal friction (ϕ) of the soil system. For saturated soils, MC equation is stated as
Unsaturated behaviour of soil and consideration of osmotic suction in soil is often encountered through an extension of MC equation by modifying the component that deals with the stress variable and angle of internal friction. Two approaches exist; the first one considers a unitary effective stress variable (Bishop 1959) for unsaturated condition, while the second approach treats net stress and matric suction as two independent stress state variables (Fredlund et al. 1978).
Following the work of Miller (1996) to treat osmotic suction as an independent stress state variable, Eq. 7 can be extended to Eq. 8 to encounter unsaturated soils with osmotic suctions.
where c′ is the effective cohesion; ϕ′, ϕa, ϕb and ϕc is the angle of internal friction with respect to changes in σ′, σ − ua, ua − uw and \(\pi\), respectively.
The friction and cohesion properties of soils are the basis to understand their shear strength. Friction between soil grains is generated due to their inherent surface roughness and adsorption on grain surfaces. Cohesion, on the other hand, refers to the adhesion irrespective of any externally allowed loads. It may stem from several possible mechanisms including cementation, interparticle attractive forces and adhesion (Mitchell and Soga 2005).
Many biogeochemical processes occur in nature that have an impact on the strength and stiffness of the soil system. The three most utilised biogeochemical processes for strengthening the soil mass are biomineralisation, biopolymer application and biogas generation.
4.2.1 Biomineralisation
The precipitated biomineral in the pores during biomineralisation makes an effective bridge between the soil grains that enhances the strength of the soil. MICP or enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) processes provide an apparent cohesion and increase the strength of geomaterial (Choi et al. 2020). Choi et al. (2020) proposed an empirical equation for estimating unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of various soil size and type treated via MICP linked with the amount of biomineral precipitated (ACP). Although, the proposed equation by them is fitted for most of the data with a strong coefficient of determination (0.81), the scattering suggests that the strength increment depends not only on the carbonate biomineral content but also on other factors such as size, morphology of precipitation and its bonding with soil grain (Rahman and Hora 2017; Xiao et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2019).
Shear strength measurements have shown an increase in the cohesion intercept, peak and residual frictional angle of the MICP/EICP modified soils (Montoya and Dejong 2015; Dejong et al. 2010; Cui et al. 2017). Most of the above studies have concluded that the behaviour of MICP treated soil is dependent upon the initial density and amount of biomineral precipitates. Also, the ductility also changes with the rate of cementation. The brittleness index (BI) (Consoli et al. 1998) showed a good correlation with amount of biomineral precipitated (ACP) (Rabbi et al. 2019).
Drained shear tests on MICP treated soil show an increase in the peak and residual strength and dilative behaviour with an increase in the ACP (Nafisi et al. 2019, 2020). Some studies have also attempted to understand the bond formation between the sand grains due to biomineral precipitation via DEM modelling (Khoubani et al. 2018; Feng et al. 2017). These models could capture peak and residual strength, nonlinearity, and softening behaviour due to MICP treatment of soil.
4.2.2 Biopolymer application
Application of biopolymers is widely used for improving strength of the soil system (Chang et al. 2016; Chen et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2018). Several studies have been conducted to study the impact of biopolymer on UCS, cohesion and friction of the soil system (Chen et al. 2016; Smitha and Sachan 2016; Fatehi et al. 2021; Choi et al. 2020). Shear behaviour of biopolymer treated soil showed a relatively large increase in cohesion intercept and minor increase in frictional angle (Chang et al. 2020). No chemical reaction occurs between the sand grains and biopolymer due to net zero charge on sand surface. Therefore, the enhancement in the shear strength is mostly dependent upon hydrogel formation, coating of sand surface, bridge formation and bond formation (Choi et al. 2020; Fatehi et al. 2021). During desaturation (evaporation of water), the dried biopolymer matrix shows increased cohesion by drawing sand grains closer to each other and hydrogel condensation (Chang and Cho 2019; Chang et al. 2018). However, for clays, the interaction is more complex since clay particles have unbalanced electrical charges on their surface. Various chemical bond such as hydrogen bonding, ionic bonds, van der Waals bonds are formed along with coating of surface by biopolymers (Mahamaya et al. 2021) in case of clays. These factors speak to an increased strength of the soil mass upon biopolymer application.
4.2.3 Biogas generation
Biogas formation can drastically influence the pore water pressure of sand. Martinez et al. (2003) demonstrated an increase in the undrained stiffness and drained strength in the soil injected with Bacillius Subtilis due to gas generation and change in saturation. Studies have also looked at the effect of biogas formation by denitrifying bacteria in mitigating the liquefaction by desaturation of sand (Rebata-Landa and Santamarina 2012).
Several other biologically mediated processes have also been utilised to remediate problematic soils which indirectly impact the strength and stiffness of soils (Panda et al. 2017; Levett et al. 2022). For example, Panda et al. (2017) tried to reduce the alkalinity of bauxite residue via various native and non-native microbes and found that the neutralized red mud has altered strength properties via formation of new mineral during bio-neutralisation.
Considering the above discussion and recognising the impact of biological processes on shear strength of soils, Eq. 8 can be further generalised in two ways to embed the biological influences i.e. either by treating \({\Psi }_{lm}\) as an independent stress state variable or by capturing the influence through apparent cohesion (clm) attributed to biological pathways. Mathematically,
where \(T=\left(\sigma -{u}_{a}\right)\mathrm{tan}{\phi }^{a}+\left({u}_{a}-{u}_{w}\right)\mathrm{tan}{\phi }^{b}+\pi \mathrm{tan}{\phi }^{c}\), ϕlm is the angle of internal friction with respect to changes in \({\Psi }_{lm}\).
4.3 Volume change behaviour
Volume change behaviour of soils is an important consideration while evaluating their engineering properties (Mishra et al. 2020a, b). The following set of constitutive equations are applicable to link the applied stress on the soils to its volume change behaviour (Fredlund and Rahardjo 1993; Miller 1996; Mishra et al. 2019).
where av, at, am and aπ are the coefficients of compressibility with respect to effective stress under saturated conditions, net normal stress, matric suction, and osmotic suction, respectively. \(\partial\) operator is used to represent small changes in void ratio (e) or the respective stress variable (σ − ua, ua − uw, \(\pi\)). It has been suggested that so long as the initial void ratio of the sample, boundary condition for loading remains the same, the shape of the deformation behaviour of sample represented by change in void ratio vs. change in applied stress plots for sample in semi logarithmic scale is independent of the mode of stress application be it purely hydraulic or mechanical stress (Baumgartl and Köck 2004; Mishra et al. 2021).
Though, the geotechnical engineers assume the compressibility and volume change behaviour mostly depend on the soil properties and load condition, the microbes present, and their microbial activities can drastically alter the volume of a soil system.
Microbes are widely linked in the adsorption, fixation, decomposition, dissolution, transformation of different soil minerals in nature (Mitchell and Santamarina 2005; Li et al. 2019; Fomina and Skorochod 2020). This degradation and transformation process could alter the void structure drastically which has a direct impact on the compressibility behaviour. A heave of 480 mm was observed on mudstone sediments in Iwaki-City of Japan linked to various microbial activities (Mitchell and Santamarina 2005). After several laboratory experiments, it was concluded that a series of microbial activities i.e., sulphate reduction, sulphate oxidation, pyrite oxidation resulted in the formation of gypsum and jarosite crystals which attributed to the heave (Yamanaka et al. 2002).
Biomineralisation impacts the compressibility behaviour of soils. For MICP treated silica sand of different grain size and cementation levels particle breakage could be restricted by making new bridges between soil grains; this resulted in decrease in the compressibility (Xiao et al. 2021; Ghasemi et al. 2022). The compression test results showed negligible reduction in the void ratio at low vertical stress range in the MICP treated sand due to the formation of effective bridge or bonding during biocementation (Wang et al. 2022). However, MICP treated sand behaves like untreated sand at high stresses. Cementation content, vertical stress and relative density of sand are the factors having an impact on the breakage of interparticle bonding and altering the compressibility behaviour of soil (Wang et al. 2022). The damage of interparticle bonding can be three types i.e. debonding, abrasion and detaching. MICP treatment has shown similar modification in the compressibility behaviour when applied on fine-grained soils (Canakci et al. 2015; Montoya et al. 2019). Literature shows that MICP treated soils have two consolidation yield stresses. The reduction in void ratio is negligible up to a particular stress i.e., first consolidation yield point. Beyond this point the interparticle bond starts breaking and the biomineral starts taking up the stress applied with a slow reduction in the void ratio or deformation until the second consolidation yield stress. Afterwards, the compression curve converges with that of the untreated soil. To understand this behaviour, a schematic diagram is presented in the Fig. 5 with the results shown adapted from that reported by Xiao et al. 2021. The three graphs shown in Fig. 5 refers to sand with a coefficient of uniformity of 1.1, either untreated (SU-C1.1) or treated with different dosages for MICP (ST-C1.1-Ca1, ST-C1.1-Ca2). The coefficient of volume compressibility and compression index is less for the biomodified sample up to secondary yield stress point and after that the corresponding values are nearly equal to those of the untreated samples (Canakci et al. 2015; Montoya et al. 2019). Although biotreatment reduces the primary consolidation, the time for consolidation increases due to the reduction in permeability. In this context, since the initial testing conditions vary, principle of critical state soil mechanics (CSM) may be considered to interpret the experimental results. CSM principles dictate that the slope of the post yield compression line is unique and independent of initial state of soil.
Xanthan gum and guar gum have been used to stabilise various types of soils modifying their compressibility behaviour (Singh and Das 2020; Kumar et al. 2021; Sujatha and Saisree 2019). The mechanisms for biopolymer interaction varies hugely with the type of soil and biopolymer, rheological properties of biopolymer, and surface properties of the soil and polymer as described by Fatehi et al. (2021) and summarised in Fig. 7. Due to the large variation in the interaction, different biopolymers act differently in geomaterials while altering their compressibility behaviour. For example, though Xanthan gum is used to stabilise highly plastic silts, the soft compressibility nature of Xanthan gum linkage increased the compression index of soil (Singh and Das 2020). Similarly, the Coefficient of consolidation and compression index increased during the addition of guar gum in the sand–clay mixtures (Kumar et al. 2021). Contrary to this observation, the study by Sujatha and Saisree (2019) concluded that the highly viscous guar gum forms strong hydrogels between soil grains and helps to reduce the compression index, compressibility of highly compressible silt–clay mixtures. High percentage of biopolymer content also reduces the volumetric change during wet–dry cycles on biopolymer treated soil. The studies show that natural or human injected biopolymer have significant effect on the compressibility behaviour of soil. However, the studies need further comprehensive analysis pertaining to the soil initial condition, type of interaction and its effect on compressibility and volume change. Also, limited studies have been conducted on the effect of type and concentration of biopolymer, condition of loading and unloading, wetting–drying path on the compressibility behaviour of biopolymer treated soil.
Considering the biological mediation and defining the biological coefficient of compressibility (alm), the generalised constitutive equation describing volume change behaviour of soils under applied load can be formulated as the following.
The biological processes alter the pore structure and contacts between soil grains which impact on the geotechnical behaviour such as strength, stiffness, and volume change behaviour of soil. The alteration in microstructure of soil system during various loading is efficiently analysed by different constitutive models (Chiu and Ng 2003; Monroy et al. 2010; Vecchia, and Romero 2013; Alonso et al. 2013). Biomediated processes such as behaviour of MICP-modified soil is also explained by various constitutive models (Feng et al. 2017; Gai and Sánchez 2019; Lu et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2023; Ahenkorah et al. 2023). These studies suggest that the models can efficiently predict the mechanical behaviour of soil modified with MICP. However, further fundamental studies and unified coupled modelling of biological processes, the alteration in pore space, and linkage in soil grains due to biological processes needs to be carried out for implementing the significance of microbial processes in geotechnical design.
4.4 Conduction phenomena
Soils are multiphasic porous materials, in which different degrees of physical connection exist between the individual phases. This allows traversal of fluids (liquids and gas), electricity, heat, and contaminants through them under applied fields that induce a differential of the respective quantities across the soil system. The differential potentials are hydraulic head for water flow, voltage for electrical flow, temperature difference for thermal migration or a chemical gradient for contaminant transport. The constitutive equation linking rate of flow (J) to the driving force (F) is a linear equation involving a material (soil) specific parameter (ζ) describing the ease with which the respective flow can occur through the soil mass (Mitchell 1991). Mathematically,
Equation 12 takes various forms depending on the type of flow under consideration (Eq. 13).
where qh, qt, qe and qc represent the hydraulic, thermal, electrical and chemical flux through the soil mass, respectively. ih, it, ie and ic represent the hydraulic, thermal, electrical and chemical gradient across the soil mass, respectively. kh, kt, ke and kc represent the hydraulic, thermal, electrical and chemical conductivity of soil mass, respectively. A represents the cross-sectional area of the soil. A comprehensive treatment of each of the conduction phenomena and their coupling has been presented elsewhere (Mitchell 1991; Mitchell and Soga 2005).
4.4.1 Flow of heat
Three mechanisms govern thermal migration through soils. These mechanisms are conduction (heat transfer through particular contact), convection (heat transfer through pore fluids) and radiation (heat transfer through electromagnetic waves, of which conduction remains as the predominant mode of heat transfer through soils. For partially saturated soils, the factors that affect thermal conductivity include mineralogy, dry density, gradation, moulding moisture content and time (Brandon and Mitchell 1989). There exists number of models (Kersten 1949; de Vries 1963; McGaw 1969; Johansen 1975; Farouki 1982; Mishra et al. 2017a, b) that predict thermal conductivity of soils based on known geotechnical properties.
Several laboratory experiments demonstrated that, MICP treatment enhances the thermal conductivities of soil by significant factors (Venuleo et al. 2016; Martinez et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2020; Xiao et al. 2021b). The increase in thermal conductivity was attributed to the precipitation of calcite crystals increasing the contact area and act as a thermal bridge between the soil grains (Ref. Fig. 6). The rate of enhancement in the thermal conductivity of MICP modified soil differs with number of treatment cycles, degrees of saturation and soil conditions (Martinez et al. 2019; Xiao et al. 2021b). Martinez et al. (2019) proposed that measurement of thermal properties may provide a proxy for assessing cementation levels and contact quality during MICP treatment.
Not only MICP, several other biochemical reactions also can have a significant impact on the thermal conduction phenomenon. For instance, Mishra et al. (2017a) observed short term increase in thermal conductivity of sand bentonite mixtures, fly ash, red mud and a local dispersive soil from India treated with an extremophile gram positive bacterium. They proposed that the observed increase in thermal conductivity may be linked to phasal augmentation or some form of biogeochemical reaction, which was explained through a four phased idealisation of the soil system. Several artificial intelligence-based algorithms were used by the authors to develop pedotransfer functions for thermal conductivity of the materials based on the experimental data.
It, therefore, is evident that biological treatments do alter thermal conductivity of soils. Such alterations are attributed to the changes in the level of densification, mineralogy and particular contact that hold a direct bearing with thermal migration through soils through heat conduction.
4.4.2 Flow of electrical current
A thorough treatment on the impacts of biological considerations on electromagnetic (EM) properties of soils have been presented in the second review paper focused on potential usage of EM methods as a monitoring tool to capture biological interactions. In this part, we will limit our discussion to some of the reported applications.
Al Hagrey et al. (2004) used electrical measurements to quantify the flow of water through soil–plant–atmosphere continuum. They used geoelectric, ground penetrating radar (GPR), time domain reflectometry (TDR) methods and suggested that soil water, structure, penetration of root zones and water uptake by them can be monitored using electrical measurements.
Furman et al. (2013) described that electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) may be used as the simplest and cheapest non-destructive tool to map and monitor the processes around the root zone. However, they also noted that the method works well for subsurface that is relatively homogenous and for measurements over a relatively large scale.
Masy et al. (2016) ERT to monitor biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in Rhine sand using a gram-positive biocatalyst. In this case, time lapse ERT measurements could furnish electrical resistivity signatures correlating well with the progress of bioremediation.
Mishra et al. (2017c) observed an increase in electrical conductivities of sand bentonite mixtures, fly ash, red mud and a local dispersive soil from India treated with an extremophile gram positive bacterium. The direct current (DC) conductivity was obtained using an electrical conductivity probe embedded in the soil, where a DC voltage was applied across the two intermediate electrodes and the DC current was measured across the two extreme electrodes. It was noted that DC electrical conductivity increased with an increase in the degree of saturation, volumetric moisture content and percentage of the bacterial addition.
Sani et al. (2020) used a native soil bacterium to treat a lateritic soil using MICP technique and conducted DC resistivity testing. They noted an increase in electrical resistivity with an increase in suspension density of the bacterial solution, compactive effort and the no. of curing days (upto 28 days).
Sun et al. (2021) used a LCR meter to measure DC resistivity (inverse of conductivity) of Yangtze river sand (China) solidified using MICP technique. They noted a linear relationship between UCS, porosity and electrical resistivity of the MICP treated sand. However, electrical resistivity of the samples correlated inversely with their carbonate content.
DC resistivity/conductivity of soils is often approximated as two resistors in parallel each representing resistance/conductance of the pore fluid and that of the surface (Ref. Fig. 6), respectively (Waxman and Smits 1968). During biomineralization, changes in DC resistivity/conductivity is linked to changes in the electrical conductivity of the pore fluid (due to microbial metabolic processes), changes in the pore structure and changes in the electrical properties of the mineral constituents (due to precipitation and dissolution of minerals) (Aetkwana and Slater 2009). Because of the existence of several compounding factors during biomineralization that can alter the DC resistivity/conductivity, the applicability of DC resistivity method during biomineralization is restricted (Ntarlagiannis et al. 2022).
To summarise, the alterations in soil properties due to biological activities leads to changes in the electrical properties of soil. Therefore, electrical methods can be used to measure and monitor biomediated and bioinspired soil processes.
4.4.3 Flow of water
Flow of water through soils is governed by the existing hydraulic head differential, and its rate is described with a quantity named as hydraulic conductivity. The major factors that influence the water flow through soils include porosity, tortuosity, specific surface area (SSA) of the grains and the properties of the pore fluid. The presence of biological systems and their interactions with soil affects the soil-pore properties and surface and pore properties of the soil system, thereby influencing the flow of water through soil.
Bacterial adhesion and deadhesion in a soil system with flow of water is affected by relative size of pore to a single microbe or microbial colony, microbial shape, roughness of grains, surface charge of both microbes and grains. Among all the factors, the pore size of soil is one of the major influencers for the bacterial adhesion Hazen’s effective diameter (D10) is used as a proxy to estimate the soil particle range that can be affected by the bacterial retardation, biofilm formation and bioclogging (Mitchell and Santamarina 2005). An example of natural bioclogging phenomenon is the oxidation pf pyrite precipitates gypsum and iron hydroxide which clogged the drainage blanket resulted in the stability failure of Carsington Dam in 1984 by the autotrophic bacteria (Mitchell and Santamarina 2005).
The precipitated biominerals during MICP in the pores clog the voids and increase the tortuosity resulting in an increase in the resistance to flow (Mujah et al. 2017). Several studies shown that the reduction in permeability is mainly dependent on the amount of biomineral precipitation (Qabany and Soga 2013; Whiffin et al. 2007; Gao et al. 2019). However, the amount of precipitation varies with the environmental condition, type and concentration of microbes and chemical reagents (Zhao et al. 2014; Ng et al. 2012; Jain and Arnepalli 2019a, b). It is observed that 2% of biomineral precipitation is effective in controlling seepage and 50–90% of reduction in permeability is possible with 10–15% precipitation (Whiffin et al. 2007; Gao et al. 2019; Yasuhara et al. 2011; Qabany and Soga 2013). Several researchers have derived empirical equations to calculate the permeability of MICP treated soil by corelating it with the amount of biomineral precipitated (Gao et al. 2019; Choi et al. 2020). Mineral cementation of sands alters the porosity, tortuosity and SSA through 3 fundamental mechanisms (Neasham 1977; Panda and Lake 1995; Lin et al. 2020). These three mechanisms (Ref. Fig. 6) include (a) pore filling (in case of calcite, quartz and feldspar), (b) pore lining (in case of chlorite, illite and smectite), and (c) pore bridging (in case of chlorite, illite, and smectite).
Biofilms and biopolymers also contribute to reduction in hydraulic conductivity (Dunsmore et al. 2004; Chang et al. 2016; Tiwari et al. 2016; Chang et al. 2020; Fatehi et al. 2021). The three major sources for deriving the biopolymers include polynucleotides, polypeptides, and polysaccharides (Chang et al. 2020; Fatehi et al. 2021). Most polysaccharide-based biopolymers have hydrophilic behaviour and form a viscous hydrogel in the presence of water. The rheology or viscous nature mainly depend on the type of biopolymer and water content ratio (Choi et al. 2020). Therefore, the change in the biopolymer modified soil system is mostly regulated by the rheology of biopolymer and the bonding formation between biopolymers and soil grains. The type of bond formation between the biopolymer and soil particles depends on the type of soil and biopolymer used. In sandy soil, biopolymer solution soaks the electrically neutral silica-based particle and coats the sand surface. After coating, it aids formation of bridges between the grains (Fatehi et al. 2021). Upon drying, the bond strength increases as the particles are drawn close to each other. The coating and bridge formation can be modelled same as pore filling and pore bridging mechanism of MICP treated soil. The interaction of biopolymer in a clayey system is more complex due to presence of surface charges on clays. 1:1 clays (e.g. kaolinite) absorbs less biopolymers since the interlayer is bonded with hydrogen bond. 2:1 clays (e.g. montmorillonite) can absorb higher biopolymer solutions as the constituting sheets are joined with weak Van der Waals force. Figure 7 presents a schematic of interaction of biopolymer with sand gains and clay particles.
To summarise, biomediation affects porosity, tortuosity, SSA and the properties of the pore fluid of the soil system which has a direct bearing on flow of water through it.
4.4.4 Flow of chemicals/contaminants
Transport of chemical species in sandy soils is controlled by advection, where the species is accompanied with the water flow. During the microbial treatment in soils, the microbes can flow due to passive diffusion and their transport in the porous media is well studied (Murphy and Ginn 2000). For homogeneous immobilisation or fixation of microbes in the sand surface, adhesion and deadhesion of microbes have been studied and calculated by DLVO theory under variable pore fluid chemistry (Harkes et al. 2010; Jain et al. 2021). The biotreatment in sand alters its permeability and could reach to a very small range for horizontal permeability comparable to fine grained soils where chemical diffusion plays an important role.
Fick’s law is the governing relationship, and the diffusion coefficient is the controlling parameter during chemical transport in the soil system. The flow is mostly dependent upon the chemical concentration gradient in aqueous flow condition. In a soil system, the diffusion of a chemical species is more complex due to (a) cross-sectional area reduction, (b) tortuous flow, (c) effect of electrical force of soil grain, (d) retardation of species due to ion exchange, adsorption, precipitation (e) biodegradation of diffusing organics, (f) osmotic counter flow, and (g) electrical imbalance (Mitchell and Soga 2005).
Microbes and biofilms present in a soil system adsorb various chemical species due to their negatively charged cell wall and charged biofilm. Microbes also degrade various compounds via their metabolic activities resulting in a change in the diffusion coefficient. Biosorption and biodegradation are well-studied in the field of bioremediation (Ren et al. 2018; Punetha et al. 2022; Varghese et al. 2021). Furthermore, microbes are well known for the solubilizing of low-grade ores or minerals such as copper, uranium, gold and assist in the bioleaching process (Bosecker 1997). Bioleaching alters the diffusion coefficient.
During MICP treatment of soils, if there is flow of chemical species due to chemical potential gradient, the diffusion coefficient is altered by the coprecipitation of heavy metals. Various studies have been conducted to precipitate and/or coprecipitate heavy metals and radionuclides in the soil system via MICP (Kang et al. 2016; Achal et al. 2012; Jain and Arnepalli 2019a, b; Kumari et al. 2014). In MICP treated soils, the surface charge also alters due to pore coating of soil grains which affects the diffusion behaviour. During biopolymer treatment in the soil, the diffusion of chemical species can vary by (a) altering the charge of the soil system due to coating and aggregation of soil surface, and (b) adsorption of various species. Several studies have been conducted to utilise natural biopolymer as an absorbent for heavy metals and other organic and inorganic pollutant (Efimova et al. 2017; Barrida et al. 2008; Mondal et al. 2022). Recently, Kumar et al. (2021) demonstrated that a 2% guar gum treatment in sand–clay mixture was effective in adsorbing heavy metals and as showed potential for usage in liner systems. However, these studies did not consider the diffusion coefficient and flow of chemical species during biopolymer treatment of soil.
In summary, biological pathways alter chemical transport through soils through 3 mechanisms including (a) aiding in adsorption of chemical species, (b) precipitation and co-precipitation of minerals and (c) leaching of minerals from the soil system. These three mechanisms have been highlighted in Fig. 6.
4.5 Durability
Assessing the long-term effect of biomediated soil processes on geotechnical design is crucial. Microbes are living organisms hence the effect of the microbes on soil systems may not be permanent. However, mediation by the microbes can alter the physical nature of geomaterial, permanently. Moreover, a single microbial cell may act as a nucleus and accelerate mineral formation. Hence, the physical changes due to microbial mediation needs an in-depth study in the future for quantifying the durability effect.
Though the presence of microbes is not permanent, the production of different metabolic products such as various organic and inorganic substances generated from the microbial processes, has a prominent long-term effect on the geomaterial.
Microbes segregate biofilms to attach to the mineral surface and signal transformation. These biofilms are long carbon chains having different compositions and surface charges. These biofilms or other plant-derived biopolymer are being used in enhancing the soil behaviour due to their high viscosity and hydrogel formation. These hydrogels either link or aggregates the soil grains and/or coat the soil surface as shown in Fig. 8. However, these polymers are mostly organic and decompose naturally with time (Mahamaya et al. 2021). The degradation process decomposes the hydrogel formation in the soil pores and weakens the soil grain linkage which impacts the overall strength and stiffness of the soil (Sujatha and Saisree 2019; Mahamaya et al. 2021). The rate of degradation varies with the polymer composition, soil polymer interaction, and environmental conditions. In this regard, various studies have been conducted on the durability of biopolymer-stabilized soil. The general conclusion is that higher biopolymer content is more resistant to alternate wetting and drying cycles and it is advisable to use tested non-biodegradable or durable biopolymers (Soroudi and Jakubowicz 2013; Sujatha and Saisree 2019; Chang et al. 2020).
Figure 8 depicts the SEM image MICP-modified sand in which the carbonate biomineral can be seen coating the sand grains. Various studies have been conducted to assess the durability of MICP-treated soil and or concrete under different harsh conditions such as dry–wet cycles, freeze–thaw cycles, presence of marine or seawater, the flow of different contaminants, the effect of different pH solutions, etc. (Gowthaman et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2022; Li et al. 2023). The above literatures discuss the rate of weakening of the linkage and loosening of the strength is reliant on the extreme soil/environmental conditions. The studies also provide different solutions such as reinforcement with fibres, retreatment in intervals for the usage of MICP treatment in the field (Spencer et al. 2020; Shan et al. 2022).
5 Summary
This article summarises the theoretical advances that have been made considering biological inspiration and mediation in the discipline of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering.
Biological inspiration provides efficient and feasible solutions to design infrastructure and non-destructive monitoring methods. Bioinspired data analysis offers the benefits to model and optimise the complex behaviour of soils and geotechnical systems. Therefore, at least in theory, it is possible to consider bioinspiration in the complete life cycle of a geotechnical system involving its design, monitoring and analysis of the monitoring data. In general, while bioinspired data analysis has reached technological maturity, bioinspired geotechnical infrastructure and monitoring are still in incipient phases of research and would need further fundamental advances before they can be applied in practice.
The manuscript further delivers the influence of microbes and their metabolic activities on the fundamental properties of geomaterials. These alteration in the fundamental properties bear consequences for the engineering behaviour of the soil system. To that end, in this study, the changes in engineering properties of soil considering biological mechanisms such as biofilm formation, biomineralisation, and biopolymer treatment has been critically reviewed. The review underpins the necessity of considering a four-phase idealisation of soil system by considering the biological presence and intervention as the fourth phase. This requires a shift in considering geotechnical engineering challenges from a “soil physics” perspective to an interdisciplinary “soil physics–soil chemistry–soil biology” based approach.
After having discussed the theoretical considerations to include biological inspiration and pathways in Geotechnical Engineering, in the second part of the review our attention will be on some of the practical considerations, case studies and monitoring methods.
References
Achal V, Pan X, Zhang D (2012) Bioremediation of strontium (Sr) contaminated aquifer quartz sand based on carbonate precipitation induced by Sr resistant Halomonas sp. Chemosphere 89(6):764–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.064
Ahenkorah I, Rahman MM, Karim MR, Beecham S (2023) Unconfined compressive strength of MICP and EICP treated sands subjected to cycles of wetting-drying, freezing-thawing and elevated temperature: experimental and EPR modelling. J Rock Mech Geotech 15(5):1226–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.08.007
Ahmad M, Tang XW, Qiu JN, Ahmad F, Gu WJ (2021) Application of machine learning algorithms for the evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential. Front Struct Civ Eng 15(2):490–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0669-5
Al Deeb B, Norwawi NM, Al-Betar MA (2014) A survey on intelligent water drop algorithm. Int J Comput Technol 13(10):5075
Al Hagrey SA, Meissner R, Werban U, Rabbel W, Ismaeil A (2004) Hydro-, bio-geophysics. Lead Edge 23(7):670–674. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1776739
Al Qabany A, Soga K (2013) Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. Geotechnique 63(4):331–339. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.022
Aleali SA, Bandini P, Newtson CM (2020) Multifaceted bioinspiration for improving the shaft resistance of deep foundations. J Bionic Eng 17(5):1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0076-6
Alonso EE, Pinyol NM, Gens A (2013) Compacted soil behaviour: initial state, structure and constitutive modelling. Géotech 63(6):463–478. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.11.P.134
Andrade JE, Gu Z, Monfared S, Mac Donald KA, Ravichandran G (2022) Measuring Terzaghi’s effective stress by decoding force transmission in fluid-saturated granular media. J Mech Phys Solids 165:104912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2022.104912
Anselmucci F, Andò E, Viggiani G, Lenoir N, Peyroux R, Arson C, Sibille L (2021) Use of X-ray tomography to investigate soil deformation around growing roots. Geotech Lett 11(1):96–102. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.20.00114
Atakan B, Akan ÖB, Tuğcu T (2009) Bio-inspired communications in wireless sensor networks. In: Subhas CM, Isaac W, Sudip M (eds) Guide to wireless sensor networks, pp. 659–685. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-218-4_26
Atekwana EA, Slater LD (2009) Biogeophysics: A new frontier in earth science research. Rev Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000285
Barriada JL, Herrero R, Prada-Rodríguez D, de Vicente MES (2008) Interaction of mercury with chitin: a physicochemical study of metal binding by a natural biopolymer. React Funct Polym 68(12):1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2008.09.002
Baumgartl T, Köck B (2004) Modeling volume change and mechanical properties with hydraulic models. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(1):57–65. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.5700
Beni G, Wang J (1993) Swarm intelligence in cellular robotic systems. In: Paolo D, Giulio S, Patrick A (eds) Robots and biological systems: towards a new bionics? (pp. 703–712) Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58069-7_38
Berlendis S, Beyssac O, Derenne S, Benzerara K, Anquetil C, Guillaumet M, Esteve I, Capelle B (2014) Comparative mineralogy, organic geochemistry and microbial diversity of the Autun black shale and Graissessac coal (France). Int J Coal Geol 132:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2014.07.005
Bishop AW (1959) The principle of effective stress. Norges Geotekniske Inst., Oslo, Norway
Bosecker K (1997) Bioleaching: Metal solubilization by microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 20(3–4):591–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(97)00036-3
Brandon TL, Mitchell JK (1989) Factors influencing thermal resistivity of sands. J Geotech Eng 115(12):1683–1698. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:12(1683)
Burrall M, DeJong JT, Martinez A, Wilson DW (2020) Vertical pullout tests of orchard trees for bio-inspired engineering of anchorage and foundation systems. Bioinspir Biomim 16(1):016009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/abb414
Canakci H, Sidik W, Kilic IH (2015) Effect of bacterial calcium carbonate precipitation on compressibility and shear strength of organic soil. Soils Found 55(5):1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.020
Cao J, Gao J, Nikafshan Rad H, Mohammed AS, Hasanipanah M, Zhou J (2021) A novel systematic and evolved approach based on XGBoost-firefly algorithm to predict Young’s modulus and unconfined compressive strength of rock. Eng Comput 16:1–7
Carmichael MJ, Carmichael SK, Santelli CM, Strom A, Bräuer SL (2013) Mn (II)-oxidizing bacteria are abundant and environmentally relevant members of ferromanganese deposits in caves of the upper Tennessee River Basin. Geomicrobiol J 30(9):779–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2013.769651
Chang I, Cho GC (2019) Shear strength behavior and parameters of microbial gellan gum-treated soils: from sand to clay. Acta Geotech 14:361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0641-x
Chang I, Prasidhi AK, Im J, Cho G-C (2015) Soil strengthening using thermo-gelation biopolymers. Constr Build Mater 77:430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.116
Chang I, Im J, Cho GC (2016) Introduction of microbial biopolymers in soil treatment for future environmentally-friendly and sustainable geotechnical engineering. Sustainability 8(3):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030251
Chang I, Kwon YM, Im J, Cho GC (2018) Soil consistency and inter-particle characteristics of xanthan gum biopolymer containing soils with pore-fluid variation. Can Geotech J 56(8):206–1213. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0254
Chang I, Lee M, Tran ATP, Lee S, Kwon Y-M, Im J, Cho G-C (2020) Review on biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) technology in geotechnical engineering practices. Transp Geotech 24:2214–3912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100385
Chapelle FH (2001) Ground-water microbiology and geochemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Charlton SGV, White MA, Jana S, Eland LE, Jayathilake PG, Burgess JG, Chen J, Wipat A, Curtis TP (2019) Regulating, measuring, and modeling the viscoelasticity of bacterial biofilms. J Bacteriol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00101-19
Chen R, Ramey D, Weiland E, Lee I, Zhang L (2016) Experimental investigation on biopolymer strengthening of mine tailings. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001568
Chen Y, Khosravi A, Martinez A, DeJong J (2021) Modeling the self-penetration process of a bio-inspired probe in granular soils. Bioinspir Biomim 16(4):046012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/abf46e
Cheng YM, Li L, Chi SC (2007) Performance studies on six heuristic global optimization methods in the location of critical slip surface. Comput Geotech 34(6):462–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.01.004
Chiu CF, Ng CWW (2003) A state-dependent elasto-plastic model for saturated and unsaturated soils. Géotech 53(9):809–829. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.9.809
Choi SG, Chang I, Lee M, Lee JH, Han JT, Kwon TH (2020) Review on geotechnical engineering properties of sands treated by microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) and biopolymers. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118415
Considine KM, Kelly AL, Fitzgerald GF, Hill C, Sleator RD (2008) High-pressure processing–effects on microbial food safety and food quality. FEMS Microbiol Lett 281(1):1–9
Consoli NC, Prietto PDM, Ulbrich LA (1998) Influence of fiber and cement addition on behavior of sandy soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(12):1211. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:12(1211)
Cui L, Sheng D (2005) Genetic algorithms in probabilistic finite element analysis of geotechnical problems. Comput Geotech 32(8):555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.11.005
Cui MJ, Zheng JJ, Zhang RJ, Lai HJ, Zhang J (2017) Influence of cementation level on the strength behaviour of bio-cemented sand. Acta Geotech 12(5):971–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0574-9
Das SK (2013) Artificial neural networks in geotechnical engineering: modeling and application issues. Metaheuristics Water Geotech Transp Eng 45:231–267
Das SK, Basudhar PK (2006) Undrained lateral load capacity of piles in clay using artificial neural network. Comput Geotech 33(8):454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.08.006
Das S, Suganthan PN (2010) Differential evolution: a survey of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 15(1):4–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2010.2059031
Das SK, Biswal RK, Sivakugan N, Das B (2011) Classification of slopes and prediction of factor of safety using differential evolution neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 64:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0839-1
de Boer R, Ehlers W (1990) The development of the concept of effective stresses. Acta Mech 83(1):77–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174734
de Vries DA (1963) Thermal properties of soils. In: van Wijk WH (ed) The physics of plant environment. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, etherlands
DeJong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC (2010) Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng 36(2):197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.029
Dejong JT, Soga K, Kavazanjian E, Burns S, van Paassen LA, Qabany AA, Aydilek A, Bang SS, Burbank M, Caslake LF, Chen CY, Cheng X, Chu J, Ciurli S, Filet AE, Fauriel S, Hamdan N, Hata T, Inajaki Y, Jefferis S, Kuo M, Laloui L, Larrahondo J, Manning DAC, Martinez B, Montoya BM, Nelson DC, Palomino A, Renforth P, Santamarina JC, Seagren EA, Tanyu B, Tseskrsky M, Weaver T (2013) Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: progress, opportunities and challenges. Geotechnique 63(4):287–301. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.017
Dhami NK, Reddy MS, Mukherjee MS (2013) Biomineralization of calcium carbonates and their engineered applications: a review. Front Microbiol 4(314):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00314
Dorgan KM (2015) The biomechanics of burrowing and boring. J Exp Biol 215(2):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.086983
Dottore ED, Mondini A, Sadeghi A, Mattoli V, Mazzolai B (2018) An efficient soil penetration strategy for explorative robots inspired by plant root circumnutation movements. Bioinspir Biomim. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa9998
Dunne WM Jr (2002) Bacterial adhesion: Seen any good biofilms lately? Clin Microbiol Rev 15(2):155–166. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.15.2.155-166.2002
Dunsmore BC, Bass CJ, Lappin-Scott HM (2004) A novel approach to investigate biofilm accumulation and bacterial transport in porous matrices. Environ Microbiol 6:183–187. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00546.x
Ebid AM (2021) 35 Years of (AI) in geotechnical engineering: state of the art. Geotech Geol Eng 39:637–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01536-7
Efimova NV, Krasnopyorova AP, Yuhno GD, Scheglovskaya AA (2017) Sorption of heavy metals by natural biopolymers. Adsorpt Sci Technol 35(7–8):595–601
Espinoza DN, Santamarina JC (2010) Ant tunneling—a granular media perspective. Granular Matter 12(6):607–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-010-0202-y
Faramarzi A, Javadi AA, Alani AM (2012) EPR-based material modelling of soils considering volume changes. Comput Geosci 48:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.05.015
Farouki OT (1982) Thermal properties of soils. CRREL Monograph No. 81-1, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH
Fatehi H, Ong DEL, Yu J, Chang I (2021) Biopolymers as green binders for soil improvement in geotechnical applications: a review. Geosciences 11(291):1–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11070291
Feng XT, Chen BR, Yang C, Zhou H, Ding X (2006) Identification of visco-elastic models for rocks using genetic programming coupled with the modified particle swarm optimization algorithm. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(5):789–801
Feng K, Montoya BM, Evans T (2017a) Discrete element method simulations of bio-cemented sands. Comput Geotech 85:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.12.028
Feng K, Montoya BM, Evans TM (2017b) Discrete element method simulations of bio-cemented sands. Comput Geotech 85:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.12.028
Fillunger P (1913) Der Auftrieb in Talsperren. Österr Wochenschrift Für Den Öffentlichen Baudienst 19(532–556):567–657
Fillunger, P. (1936). Erdbaumechanik? Viena.
Flemming HC, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2415
Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, Steinberg P, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S (2016) Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:563–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
Floreano D, Mattiussi C (2008) Bio-inspired artificial intelligence: theories, methods, and technologies. MIT Press
Fogel DB (2000) What is evolutionary computation? IEEE Spectr 37(2):26–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/6.819926
Fomina M, Skorochod I (2020) Microbial interaction with clay minerals and its environmental and biotechnological implications. Minerals 10(10):861. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100861
Fredlund DG, Morgenstern NR (1977) Stress state variables for unsaturated soils. J Geotech Eng Div 103(5):447. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000423
Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. Wiley
Fredlund DG, Morgenstern NR, Widger RA (1978) The shear strength of unsaturated soils. Can Geotech J 15(3):313–321. https://doi.org/10.1139/t78-029
Frost JD, Martinez A, Mallett SD, Roozbahani MM, DeJong JT (2017) The intersection of modern soil mechanics with ants and roots. In: Geotechnical frontiers 2017, Orlando, Florida, March 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480472.096
Furman A, Arnon-Zur A, Assouline S (2013) Electrical resistivity tomography of the root zone. In: Anderson SH, Hopmans JW (eds) Soil–water–root processes: advances in tomography and imaging, vol 61. SSSA Special Publications, USA, pp 223–245. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub61.c11
Gadd GM (2010) Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation. Microbiology 156(3):609–643. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.037143-0
Gai X, Sánchez M (2019) An elastoplastic mechanical constitutive model for microbially mediated cemented soils. Acta Geotech 14:709–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0721-y
Gandomi AH, Kashani AR, Mousavi M, Jalalvandi M (2017) Slope stability analysis using evolutionary optimization techniques. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 41(2):251–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2554
Gao W (2015) Slope stability analysis based on immunised evolutionary programming. Environ Earth Sci 74(4):3357–3369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4372-0
Gao Y, Tang X, Chu J, He J (2019) Microbially induced calcite precipitation for seepage control in sandy soil. Geomicrobiol J 36(4):366–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2018.1556750
Garcia-Rubio R, de Oliveira HC, Rivera J, Trevijano-Contador N (2020) The fungal cell wall: candida, cryptococcus, and aspergillus species. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02993
Garg A, Garg A, Lam JS (2015) Evolving functional expression of permeability of fly ash by a new evolutionary approach. Transp Porous Media 107(2):555–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-015-0454-4
Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76(2):60–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/003754970107600201
Ghasemi P, Liu Q, Montoya BM (2022) Compressibility behavior of MICP-treated sand treated under unsaturated conditions. In: Geo-Congress, Charlotte, North Carolina, March 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484012.032
Ghazavi M, Salavaty V (2011) Sensitivity analysis and design and of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls using bacterial foraging optimization algorithm. Geotech Saf Risk ISGSR 2011:307–314
Ghorbani A, Eslami A (2021) Energy-based model for predicting liquefaction potential of sandy soils using evolutionary polynomial regression method. Comput Geotech 129:103867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103867
Glover F, Laguna M (1998) Tabu search. In: Ding-Zhu D, Panos M. P (eds) Handbook of combinatorial optimization, pp 2093–2229. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0303-9_33
Goh AT (1994) Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks. J Geotech Eng 120(9):1467–1480. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:9(1467)
Goh AT (2007) Search for critical slip circle using genetic algorithms. Civ Eng Syst 17(3):181–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02630250008970282
Goh AT, Kulhawy FH, Chua CG (2005) Bayesian neural network analysis of undrained side resistance of drilled shafts. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(1):84–93
Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA (ISBN: 978-0-201-15767-3)
Gowthaman S, Nakashima K, Kawasaki S (2021) Durability analysis of bio-cemented slope soil under the exposure of acid rain. J Soils Sediments 21:2831–2844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-021-02997-w
Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Kalatehjari R (2018) Applications of particle swarm optimization in geotechnical engineering: a comprehensive review. Geotech Geol Eng 36(2):705–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0356-z
Hall CA, Hernandez G, Darby KM, van Paassen L, Kavazanjian Jr E, DeJong J, Wilson D (2018) Centrifuge model testing of liquefaction mitigation via denitrification-induced desaturation. In: Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics V, June 10–13, Austin, Texas. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482834.028
Harandizadeh H, Toufigh MM, Toufigh V (2019) Application of improved ANFIS approaches to estimate bearing capacity of piles. Soft Comput 23(19):9537–9549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3517-y
Harkes MP, van Paassen LA, Booster JL, Whiffin VS, van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecol Eng 36(2):112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.01.004
Hazael R, Meersman F, Ono F, McMillan PF (2016) Pressure as a limiting factor for life. Life (Basel) 6(3):34
Hedrich S, Schlömann M, Johnson DB (2011) The iron- oxidizing proteobacteria. Microbiology 157(6):1551–1564. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.045344-0
Hemmati S, Gatmiri B, Cui YJ, Vincent M (2012) Thermo-hydro-mechanical modelling of soil settlements induced by soil-vegetation-atmosphere interactions. Eng Geol 139–140:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.04.003
Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT Press. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6267401
Hosseini HS (2007) Problem solving by intelligent water drops. IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, pp 3226–3231. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2007.4424885
Huang W, Mou Y, Li Y, Zhao B, Li J, Wu X, Zhou M (2022) Study on durability of MICP treated cohesive soils under dry–wet cycle and freeze–thaw cycle. Arab J Geosci 15(5):422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09702-2
Huang L, Martinez A (2020) Study of interface frictional anisotropy at bioinspired soil-structure interfaces with compliant asperities. In: Geo-congress 2020, Minneapolis, Minnesota, February 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482834.028
Hutchens E (2009) Microbial selectivity on mineral surfaces: possible implications for weathering processes. Fungal Biol Rev 23(4):115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2009.10.002
Jain S, Arnepalli DN (2019) Biochemically induced carbonate precipitation in aerobic and anaerobic environments by Sporosarcina pasteurii. Geomicrobio J 36(5):443–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2019.1569180
Jain S, Arnepalli DN (2019) Biominerlisation as a remediation technique: a critical review. In: Stalin V, Muttharam M (eds) Geotechnical characterisation and geoenvironmental engineering, vol 16. Springer, Singapore, pp 155–162
Jain S, Fang C, Achal V (2021) A critical review on carbonate precipitation via denitrification process in building materials. Bioengineered 12(1):7529–7551. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.1979862
Javadi AA, Rezania M (2009) Intelligent finite element method: an evolutionary approach to constitutive modeling. Adv Eng Inform 23(4):442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2009.06.008
Jennings JEB, Burland JB (1962) Limitations to the use of effective stresses in partly saturated soils. Géotech 12(2):125–144. https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1962.12.2.125
Jin YF, Yin ZY (2020) An intelligent multi-objective EPR technique with multi-step model selection for correlations of soil properties. Acta Geotech 15(8):2053–2073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00929-5
Johansen O (1975) Thermal conductivity of soils. Dissertation, Institute for Kjoleteknikk, Trondheim, Norway
Judge PK, Sundberg E, DeGroot DJ, Zhang G (2022) Effects of biopolymers on the liquid limit and undrained shear strength of soft clays. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02830-9
Kang CH, Kwon YJ, So JS (2016) Bioremediation of heavy metals by using bacterial mixtures. Ecol Eng 89:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.023
Kardani N, Zhou A, Nazem M, Shen SL (2021) Improved prediction of slope stability using a hybrid stacking ensemble method based on finite element analysis and field data. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 13(1):188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.05.011
Katariya L, Ramesh PB, Borges RM (2018) Dynamic environments of fungus-farming termite mounds exert growth modulating effects on fungal crop parasites. Environ Microbiol 20(3):971–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14026
Kelly LC, Colin Y, Turpault MP, Uroz S (2016) Mineral type and solution chemistry affect the structure and composition of actively growing bacterial communities as revealed by bromodeoxyuridine immunocapture and 16S rRNA pyrosequencing. Microb Ecol 72(2):428–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0774-0
Kennedy J (2006) Swarm intelligence. Handbook of nature-inspired and innovative computing, pp 187–219
Kersten MS (1949) Laboratory research for the determination of the thermal properties of soils. ACFEL Technical Rep. No. 23, University of Minnesota, USA
Khajehzadeh M, Taha MR, Eslami M (2013) A new hybrid firefly algorithm for foundation optimization. Natl Acad Sci Lett 36(3):279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-013-0129-z
Khajehzadeh M, Taha MR, Eslami M (2014) Multi-objective optimization of foundation using global-local gravitational search algorithm. Struct Eng Mech 50(3):257–273. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.50.3.257
Khalili NGFA, Geiser F, Blight GE (2004) Effective stress in unsaturated soils: review with new evidence. Int J Geomech 4(2):115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2004)4:2(115)
Khoubani A, Nafisi A, Evans T, Montoya B (2018) The effect of grain size and shape on mechanical behavior of MICP treated sand II: numerical study. In: Proceedings of international symposium of bio-mediated and bio-inspired geotechnics, Atlanta, Georgia
Konhauser KO (2006) Introduction to geomicrobiology. Wiley
Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: one the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175355
Kumar V, Kumar D (2021) A systematic review on firefly algorithm: past, present, and future. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28(4):3269–3291
Kumar AS, Sujatha ER, Pugazhendi A, Jamal MT (2021) Guar gum-stabilized soil: a clean, sustainable and economic alternative liner material for landfills. Clean Technol Environ Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02032-z
Kumari D, Pan X, Lee DJ, Achal V (2014) Immobilization of cadmium in soil by microbially induced carbonate precipitation with Exiguobacterium undae at low temperature. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 94:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.07.007
Leung AK, Gard A, Coo JL, Ng CWW, Hau BCH (2015) Effects of the roots of Cynodon dactylon and Schefflera heptaphylla on water infiltration rate and soil hydraulic conductivity. Hydrol Process 29(15):3342–3354. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10452
Levett A, Gagen E, Paz A, Vasconcelos P, Southam G (2022) Strategising the bioremediation of Brazilian iron ore mines. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 52(15):2749–2771. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1896346
Li J, Sun W, Wang S, Sun Z, Lin S, Peng X (2014) Bacteria diversity, distribution and insight into their role in S and Fe biogeochemical cycling during black shale weathering. Environ Microbiol 16(11):3533–3547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12536
Li QY, Lu H, Yin YX, Qin YM, Tang AX, Liu HB, Liu YY (2019) Synergic effect of adsorption and biodegradation enhance cyanide removal by immobilized Alcaligenes sp. strain DN25. J Hazard Mater 364:367–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.007
Li Y, Yilong L, Zhen G, Qiang X (2023) Durability of MICP-reinforced calcareous sand in marine environments: laboratory and field experimental study. Biogeotechnics 1(2):100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100018
Lin H, Suleiman MT, Brown DG (2020) Investigation of pore-scale CaCO3 distributions and their effects on stiffness and permeability of sands treated by microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP). Soils Found 60(4):944–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.07.003
Liu J, Bai Y, Song Z, Lu Y, Qian W, Kanungo DP (2018) Evaluation of strength properties of sand modified with organic polymers. Polymers 10(3):287. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030287
Liu L, Liu H, Stuedlein AW, Evans TM, Xiao Y (2019) Strength, stiffness, and microstructure characteristics of biocemented calcareous sand. Can Geotech J 56(10):1502–1513. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0007
Lu Y, Zhu WX, Ye GL, Zhang F (2021) A unified constitutive model for cemented/non-cemented soils under monotonic and cyclic loading. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01348-w
Macdonald I, Ferry L, Summers A, Gibb A (2014) Do Pacific sandfish (Trichodon trichodon) use a modified two-phase respiratory pump for rapid burial? In: Proceedings of society for integrative and comparative biology 2014 annual meeting, pp 129. Herndon, VA, USA, Society for integrative and comparative biology
Mahamaya M, Das SK, Reddy KR, Jain S (2021) Interaction of biopolymer with dispersive geomaterial and its characterization: An eco-friendly approach for erosion control. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127778
Mallett S, Matsumura S, Frost JD (2018) Additive manufacturing and computed tomography of bio-inspired anchorage systems. Geotech Lett 8(3):219–225. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.18.00090
Martinez A, O’Hara KB (2021) Skin friction directionality in monotonically- and cyclically-loaded bio-inspired piles in sand. Deep Found Inst J. https://dfi-journal.org/dfi/journal/pdfs/vol15no1martinez222.pdf
Martínez GA, Maya LF, Rueda DA, Sierra GD (2003) Aplicaciones estructurales de bacterias en la construcción de nuevasobras de infraestructura. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín
Martinez A, O’Hara KB, Sinha SK, Wilson D, Ziotopoulou K (2018) Monotonic and cyclic centrifuge testing of snake skin-inspired piles. In: Biomediated and bioinspired geotechnics conference, Atlanta, GA, USA
Martinez A, Huang L, Gomez MG (2019) Thermal conductivity of MICP-treated sands at varying degrees of saturation. Géotech Lett 9(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.18.00126
Martinez A, DeJong JT, Jaeger RA, Khosravi A (2020) Evaluation of self-penetration potential of a bio-inspired site characterization probe by cavity expansion analysis. Can Geotech J 57(5):706–716. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0864
Martinez A, Dejong J, Akin I, Aleali A, Arson C, Atkinson J, Bandini P, Baser T, Borela R, Boulanger R, Burrall M, Chen Y, Collins C, Cortes D, Dai S, DeJong T, Dottore ED, Dorgan K, Fragaszy R, Frost JD, Full R, Ghayoomi M, Goldman DI, Gravish N, Guzman IL, Hambleton J, Hawkes E, Helms M, Hu D, Huang L, Huang S, Hunt C, Irschick D, Lin HT, Lingwall B, Marr A, Mazzolai B, McInroe B, Murthy T, O’Hara K, Porter M, Sadek S, Sanchez M, Santamarina C, Shao L, Sharp J, Stuart H, Stutz HH, Summers A, Tao J, Tolley M, Treers L, Turnbull K, Valdes R, van Paassen L, Viggiani G, Wilson D, Wu W, Yu X, Zheng J (2022) Bio-inspired geotechnical engineering: principles, current work, opportunities and challenges. Geotechnique 72(8):687–705. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.20.P.170
Marvi H, Bridges J, Hu DL (2013) Snakes mimic earthworms: propulsion using rectilinear travelling waves. J R Soc Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0188
Masy T, Caterina D, Tromme O, Lavigne B, Thonart P, Hiligsmann S, Nguyen F (2016) Electrical resistivity tomography to monitor enhanced biodegradation of hydrocarbons with Rhodococcus erythropolis T902. 1 at a pilot scale. J Contam Hydrol 184:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.11.001
McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5(4):115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259
McGaw R (1969) Heat conduction in saturated granular materials: Effects of temperature and heat on engineering behaviour of soils. Highw Res Board Spec Rep 103:114–131
McInroe B, Goldman DI, Full RJ (2018) Substrate volume fraction predicts burrowing dynamics in sand crabs. In: Proceedings of society for integrative and comparative biology 2018 annual meeting, Herndon, VA, USA, p 271
McKee A, MacDonald I, Farina SC, Summers AP (2016) Undulation frequency affects burial performance in living and model flatfishes. Zoology 119(2):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2015.12.004
Merrikh-Bayat F (2015) The runner-root algorithm: a metaheuristic for solving unimodal and multimodal optimization problems inspired by runners and roots of plants in nature. Appl Soft Comput 33:292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.04.048
Miller DJ (1996) Osmotic suction as a valid stress state variable in unsaturated soils. Dissertation, Colorado State University, USA
Minsky M, Papert S (1969) An introduction to computational geometry. Cambridge tiass. HIT 479:480. ISBN: 978026263022
Mishra PN (2020) Soft soil characterisation and improvement for reclaimed land application. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Queensland, Australia
Mishra PN, Suman S, Das SK (2017) Experimental investigation and prediction models for thermal conductivity of biomodified buffer materials for hazardous waste disposal. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000327
Mishra PN, Surendran S, Gadi VK, Arnepalli Joseph RA., DN, (2017) Generalized approach for determination of thermal conductivity of buffer materials. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000357
Mishra PN, Das SK, Mohanty R (2017) Electrical conductivity of microbially treated geomaterials and Industrial Wastes. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000358
Mishra PN, Scheuermann A, Bore T, Li L (2019) Salinity effects on soil shrinkage characteristic curves of fine-grained geomaterials. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 11(1):181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.06.008
Mishra PN, Zhang Y, Bhuyan MH, Scheuermann A (2020) Anisotropy in volume change behaviour of soils during shrinkage. Acta Geotech 15(12):3399–3414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01015-6
Mishra PN, Scheuermann A, Li L (2020) Evaluation of hydraulic conductivity functions of saturated soft soils. Int J Geomech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001847
Mishra PN, Scheuermann A, Bhuyan MH (2021) A unified approach for establishing soil water retention and volume change behavior of soft soils. Geotech Test J 44(5):1197–1216. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20200009
Mitchell JK (1991) Conduction phenomena: from theory to geotechnical practice. Geotechnique 41(3):299–340. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.3.299
Mitchell JK, Santamarina JC (2005) Biological considerations in geotechnical engineering. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(10):1222–1233. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:10(1222)
Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley, New York
Momeni E, Yarivand A, Dowlatshahi MB, Armaghani DJ (2021) An efficient optimal neural network based on gravitational search algorithm in predicting the deformation of geogrid-reinforced soil structures. Transp Geotech 26:100446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100446
Monaenkova D, Gravish N, Rodriguez G, Kutner R, Goodisman MAD, Goldman DI (2015) Behavioral and mechanical determinants of collective subsurface nest excavation. J Exp Biol 218(9):1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.113795
Mondal SK, Wu C, Nwadire FC, Rownaghi A, Kumar A, Adewuyi Y, Okoronkwo MU (2022) Examining the effect of a chitosan biopolymer on alkali-activated inorganic material for aqueous Pb(II) and Zn(II) sorption. Langmuir 38(3):903–913. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01829
Monroy R, Zdravkovic L, Ridley A (2010) Evolution of microstructure in compacted London Clay during wetting and loading. Géotechnique 60(2):105–119. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.125
Montoya BM, DeJong JT (2015) Stress–strain behavior of sands cemented by microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001302
Montoya BM, Safavizadeh S, Gabr MA (2019) Enhancement of coal ash compressibility parameters using microbial-induced carbonate precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002036
Muduli PK, Das SK (2014) Evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil based on standard penetration test using multi-gene genetic programming model. Acta Geophys 62(3):529–543. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-013-0181-6
Muduli PK, Das SK (2015a) Model uncertainty of SPT-based method for evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential using multi-gene genetic programming. Soils Found 55(2):258–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.02.003
Muduli PK, Das SK (2015b) First-order reliability method for probabilistic evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil using genetic programming. Int J Geomech 15(3):04014052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000377
Muduli PK, Das SK, Das MR (2013) Uplift capacity of suction caisson in clay using artificial intelligence techniques. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 1(4):375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2012.690827
Muduli PK, Das SK, Bhattacharya S (2014) CPT-based probabilistic evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential using multi-gene genetic programming. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 8(1):14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.845720
Muduli PK, Das MR, Das SK, Senapati S (2015) Lateral load capacity of piles in clay using genetic programming and multivariate adaptive regression spline. Indian Geotech J 45(3):349–359
Mueller EA, Levin PA (2020) Bacterial cell wall quality control during environmental stress. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02456-20
Mujah D, Shahin MA, Cheng L (2017) State-of-the-art review of bio-cementation by microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) for soil stabilization. Geomicrobiol J 34(6):524–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2016.1225866
Mujah D, Cheng L, Shahin MA (2019) Microstructural and geomechanical study on biocemented sand for optimization of MICP process. J Mater Civ Eng 31(4):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002660
Murphy EM, Ginn TR (2000) Modeling microbial processes in porous media. Hydrogeol J 8(1):142–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100409900043
Naclerio ND, Hubicki CM, Aydin YO, Goldman DI, Hawkes EW (2018) Soft robotic burrowing device with tip-extension and granular fluidization. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Madrid, Spain, 01–05 October, pp 5918–5923. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8593530
Nafisi A, Mocelin D, Montoya BM, Underwood S (2019) Tensile strength of microbially induced carbonate precipitation treated sands. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0230
Nafisi A, Montoya BM, Evans TM (2020) Shear strength envelopes of biocemented sands with varying particle size and cementation level. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002201
Neasham JW (1977) The morphology of dispersed clay in sandstone reservoirs and its effect on sandstone shaliness, pore space and fluid flow properties. In: 52nd SPE annual fall technical conference and exhibition proceeding, Denver, Colorado, Oct 9–12. https://doi.org/10.2118/6858-MS
Ng W, Lee M, Hii S (2012) An overview of the factors affecting microbial-induced calcite precipitation and its potential application in soil improvement. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 62(2):723–729. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1084674
Ng CWW, Woon KX, Leung AK, Chu LM (2013) Experimental investigation of induced suction distribution in a grass-covered soil. Ecol Eng 52:219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.013
Njock PGA, Shen SL, Zhou A, Modoni G (2021) Artificial neural network optimized by differential evolution for predicting diameters of jet grouted columns. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 13(6):1500–1512
Noorany I (1984) Phase relations in marine soils. J Geotech Eng 110(4):539–543
Ntarlagiannis D, Wu Y, Mellage A (2022) Geophysical monitoring and characterization of biomineralization processes. In: Berenjian A, Seifan M (eds) Mineral formation by microorganisms microbiology monographs, vol 36. Springer, Cham, pp 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80807-5_3
Nuth M, Laloui L (2008) Advances in modelling hysteretic water retention curve in deformable soils. Comput Geotech 35(6):835–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.08.001
O’Donnell ST, Hamdan N, Rittmann BE, Kavazanjian E Jr (2016). A stoichiometric model for biogeotechnical soil improvement. In: Geo-Chicago August 14–18, Chicago, Illinois, USA. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480120.002
O’Donnell ST, Kavazanjian E, Rittmann BE (2017) Liquefaction mitigation via microbial denitrification as a two-stage process, stage I: desaturation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001818
O’Donnell ST, Hall CA, Kavazanjian E, Rittmann BE (2019) Biogeochemical model for soil improvement by denitrification. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002126
Olsson-Francis K, Simpson AE, Wolff-Boenisch D, Cockell CS (2012) The effect of rock composition on cyanobacterial weathering of crystalline basalt and rhyolite. Geobiology 10(5):434–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4669.2012.00333.x
Panda MN, Lake LW (1995) A physical model of cementation and its effects on single-phase permeability. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 79(3):431–443. https://doi.org/10.1306/8D2B1552-171E-11D7-8645000102C1865D
Panda I, Jain S, Das SK, Jayabalan R (2017) Characterization of red mud as a structural fill and embankment material using bioremediation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 119:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.11.026
Peng E, Sheng Y, Hu X, Zhang D, Hou Z (2021) Mitigation of sand liquefaction under static loading condition using biogas bubbles generated by denitrifying bacteria. J Environ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113106
Persat A, Nadell CD, Kim MK, Ingremeau F, Siryaporn A, Drescher K, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL, Gitai Z, Stone HA (2015) The mechanical world of bacteria. Cell 161(5):988–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.005
Peterson BW, He Y, Ren Y, Zerdoum A, Libera MR, Sharma PK, van Winkelhoff AJ, Neut D, Stoodley P, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (2015) Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39(2):234–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuu008
Pham DT, Castellani M, & Le-Thi HA (2013) The bees algorithm: modelling nature to solve complex optimisation problems. In: International conference on manufacturing research (ICMR2013), pp 481–488. http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/9527
Punetha A, Saraswat S, Rai JPN (2022) An insight on microbial degradation of benzo [a] pyrene: current status and advances in research. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-022-03250-3
Rabbi ATMZ, Rahman MM, Cameron DA (2019) The relation between the state indices and the characteristic features of undrained behaviour of silty sand. Soils Found 59(4):801–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.05.001
Rahman MM, Hora RN (2017) Unconfined compressive strength of microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) treated soils. In: 19th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering proceedings, Seoul, Korea, 17–22 September
Rao SM, Thyagaraj T (2007) Swell–compression behaviour of compacted clays under chemical gradients. Can Geotech J 44(5):520–532. https://doi.org/10.1139/t07-002
Rashed A, Bazaz JB, Alavi AH (2012) Nonlinear modeling of soil deformation modulus through LGP-based interpretation of pressuremeter test results. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(7):1437–1449
Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Saryazdi S (2009) GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Inf Sci 179(13):2232–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004
Rebata-Landa V, Santamarina JC (2012) Mechanical effects of biogenic nitrogen gas bubbles in soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000571
Ren X, Zeng G, Tang L, Wang J, Wan J, Wang J, Deng Y, Liu Y, Peng B (2018) The potential impact on the biodegradation of organic pollutants from composting technology for soil remediation. Waste Manag 72:138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.032
Rezania M, Javadi AA, Giustolisi O (2010) Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT results using evolutionary polynomial regression. Comput Geotech 37(1–2):82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.07.006
Rosenblatt F (1958) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65(6):386. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042519
Ruiz S, Or D, Schymanski SJ (2015) Soil penetration by earthworms and plant roots—mechanical energetics of bioturbation of compacted soils. PLoS ONE 10(6):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128914
Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, PDP Research Group (1988) Parallel distributed processing. IEEE, New York (ISBN: 9780262680530)
Saad EM, Sun J, Chen S, Borkiewicz OJ, Zhu M, Duckworth OW, Tang Y (2017) Siderophore and organic acid promoted dissolution and transformation of Cr(III)–Fe(III)–(oxy) hydroxides. Environ Sci Technol 51(6):3223–3232. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05408
Salcedo-Sanz S, Del Ser J, Landa-Torres I, Gil-López S, Portilla-Figueras JA (2014) The coral reefs optimization algorithm: a novel metaheuristic for efficiently solving optimization problems. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/739768
Samarajiva P, Macari EJ, Wathugala W (2005) Genetic algorithms for the calibration of constitutive models for soils. Int J Geomech 5(3):206–217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:3(206)
Samui P, Hoang ND, Nhu VH, Nguyen ML, Ngo PT, Bui DT (2019) A new approach of hybrid bee colony optimized neural computing to estimate the soil compression coefficient for a housing construction project. Appl Sci 9(22):4912. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224912
Sani JE, Moses G, Oriola FOP (2020) Evaluating the electrical resistivity of microbial-induced calcite precipitate-treated lateritic soil. SN Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03285-x
Savioli A, Viggiani C, Santamarina JC (2014) Root–soil mechanical interaction. In: Abu-Farsakh M, Yu X, Hoyos LR (eds) Geo-congress 2014 technical papers: geocharacterization and modeling for sustainability, vol 234. Geotechnical Special Publication, Reston, pp 3977–3984
Shahin MA (2015) Use of evolutionary computing for modelling some complex problems in geotechnical engineering. Geomech Geoeng 10(2):109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2014.921333
Shahnazari H, Dehnavi Y, Alavi AH (2010) Numerical modeling of stress–strain behavior of sand under cyclic loading. Eng Geol 116(1–2):53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.07.007
Shahnazari H, Tutunchian MA, Rezvani R, Valizadeh F (2013) Evolutionary-based approaches for determining the deviatoric stress of calcareous sands. Comput Geosci 50:84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.006
Shan Y, Liang J, Tong H, Yuan J, Zhao J (2022) Effect of different fibers on small-strain dynamic properties of microbially induced calcite precipitation–fiber combined reinforced calcareous sand. Constr Build Mater 322:126343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126343
Sharpe SS, Kuckuk R, Goldman DI (2015) Controlled preparation of wet granular media reveals limits to lizard burial ability. Phys Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/12/4/046009
Sheikholeslami R, Khalili BG, Sadollah A, Kim J (2016) Optimization of reinforced concrete retaining walls via hybrid firefly algorithm with upper bound strategy. KSCE J Civ Eng 20(6):2428–2438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-1163-9
Shin H, Santamarina JC (2011) Open-mode discontinuities in soils. Geotech Lett 1(4):95–99. https://doi.org/10.1680/geolett.11.00014
Simpson AR, Priest SD (1993a) The application of genetic algorithms to optimisation problems in geotechnics. Comput Geotech 15(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-352X(93)90014-X
Simpson AR, Priest SD (1993b) The application of genetic algorithms to optimisation problems in geotechnics. Comput Geotech 15(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-352X(93)90014-X
Singh SP, Das R (2020) Geo-engineering properties of expansive soil treated with xanthan gum biopolymer. Geomech Geoeng 15(2):107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2019.1632495
Smitha S, Sachan A (2016) Use of agar biopolymer to improve the shear strength behavior of sabarmati sand. Int J Geotech Eng 10:387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1152674
Soga K (2011) Embodied energy and gas emission of geotechnical infrastructure. In: Lai S (ed) Geotechnics and earthquake geotechnics towards global sustainability, vol 15. Springer, Netherlands, pp 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0470-1_4
Soroudi A, Jakubowicz I (2013) Recycling of bioplastics, their blends and biocomposites: a review. Eur Polym J 49(10):2839–2858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.07.025
Spencer CA, van Paassen L, Sass H (2020) Effect of jute fibres on the process of MICP and properties of biocemented sand. Materials 13(23):5429. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235429
Sujatha ER, Saisree S (2019) Geotechnical behaviour of guar gum-treated soil. Soils Found 59(6):2155–2166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.11.012
Sun X, Miao L, Xia J, Wang H (2021) Evaluation and prediction for the cementation effect of MICP based on electrical resistivity. J Mater Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003896
Switala BM, Wu W (2018) Numerical modelling of rainfall-induced instability of vegetated slopes. Geotechnique 68(6):481–491. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.176
Terzaghi K (1936) The shearing resistance of saturated soils. In: 1st International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering proceeding, Harvard University, Cambridge, United Kingdom, vol 1, pp 54–56
Thorley R, Taylor LL, Banwart SA, Leake JR, Beerling DJ (2015) The role of forest trees and their mycorrhizal fungi in carbonate rock weathering and its significance for global carbon cycling. Plant Cell Environ 38(9):1947–1961. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12444
Tiwari SK, Sharma JP, Yadav JS (2016) Behavior of dune sand and its stabilization techniques. J Adv Res Appl Mech 19(1):1–15
Trueman ER (1968) The burrowing activities of bivalves. J Zool 154(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1968.tb05037.x
Tuhtan JA, Nag S, Kruusmaa M (2020) Underwater bioinspired sensing: New opportunities to improve environmental monitoring. IEEE Instrum Meas Mag 23(2):30–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2020.9062685
Turing AM (2009) Computing machinery and intelligence. In: Robert E, Gary R, Grace B (eds) Parsing the turing test Springer, Dordrecht 23–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_3
Turner JS, Soar RC (2008) Beyond biomimicry: What termites can tell us about realizing the living building. In: May. First international conference on industrialized, intelligent construction, Loughborough University, United Kingdom, May14–16
Vardakos S, Gutierrez M, Xia C (2012) Parameter identification in numerical modeling of tunneling using the differential evolution genetic algorithm (DEGA). Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.10.003
Varghese EM, Sivadas S, Suresh C, Devikrishna U, Vidhya K, Akhil KP, Jisha MS (2021) Biodegradation of chlorpyrifos by an optimized Bacillus consortium isolated from pesticide-contaminated soils of Kerala, India. Int J Pest Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2021.1973690
Vecchia GD, Romero E (2013) A fully coupled elastic–plastic hydromechanical model for compacted soils accounting for clay activity. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 37(5):503–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1116
Venuleo S, Laloui L, Terzis D, Hueckel T, Hassan M (2016) Microbially induced calcite precipitation effect on soil thermal conductivity. Géotech Lett 6(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.15.00125
Vera M, Schippers A, Sand W (2013) Progress in bioleaching: fundamentals and mechanisms of bacterial metal sulfide oxidation—Part A. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(17):7529–7541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4954-2
Vesala R, Harjuntausta A, Hakkarainen A, Rönnholm P, Pellikka P, Rikkinen J (2019) Termite mound architecture regulates nest temperature and correlates with species identities of symbiotic fungi. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6237
Wang Z, Zhang N, Ding J, Li Q, Xu J (2020) Thermal conductivity of sands treated with microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) and model prediction. Int J Heat Mass Transf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118899
Wang Y, Jiang N, Saracho AC, Doygun O, Du Y, Han X (2022) Compressibility characteristics of bio-cemented calcareous sand treated through the bio-stimulation approach. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.05.007
Wang Z, Zhao X, Chen X, Cao P, Cao L, Chen W (2023) Mechanical properties and constitutive model of calcareous sand strengthened by MICP. J Mar Sci Eng 11(4):819. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11040819
Waxman MH, Smits LJM (1968) Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands. Soc Pet Eng J 8(02):107–122. https://doi.org/10.2118/1863-A
Welch SA, Barker WW, Banfield JF (1999) Microbial extracellular polysaccharides and plagioclase dissolution. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63(9):1405–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00031-9
Whiffin VS, van Paassen LA, Harkes MP (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24(5):417–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450701436505
Willey J, Sherwood L, Woolverton C (2008) Prescott’s microbiology, 9th edn. Mcgraw Hill Higher Education, London
Winter AG, Deits RLH, Hosoi AE (2012) Localized fluidization burrowing mechanics of Ensis directus. J Expl Biol 215(12):2072–2080. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.058172
Xiao Y, Stuedlein AW, Ran J, Evans TM, Cheng L, Liu H, Van Paassen LA, Chu J (2019) Effect of particle shape on strength and stiffness of biocemented glass beads. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002165
Xiao Y, Zhao C, Sun Y, Wang S, Wu H, Chen H, Liu H (2021) Compression behavior of MICP-treated sand with various gradations. Acta Geotech 16:1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01116-2
Xiao Y, Tang Y, Ma G, McCartney JS, Chu J (2021) Thermal conductivity of biocemented graded sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002621
Yamanaka T, Miyasaka H, Aso I, Tanigawa M, Shoji K (2002) Involvement of sulfur- and iron-transforming bacteria in heaving of house foundations. Geomicrobiol J 19(5):519–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450290098487
Yang XS (2010) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press
Yasuhara H, Hayashi K, Okamura M, (2011) Evolution in mechanical and hydraulic properties of calcite-cemented sand mediated by biocatalyst. In: Geo-Frontiers congress, Dallas, Texas, United States, March 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/41165(397)407
Yin ZY, Jin YF, Huang HW, Shen SL (2016) Evolutionary polynomial regression based modelling of clay compressibility using an enhanced hybrid real-coded genetic algorithm. Eng Geol 210:158–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.06.016
Zachariah N, Das A, Murthy TG, Borges RM (2017) Building mud castles: a perspective from brick-laying termites. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04295-3
Zamani A, Montoya BM (2015) Undrained behavior of silty soil improved with microbial induced cementation. In: 6th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering proceeding, Christchurch, New Zealand, Nov 1–4
Zamani A, Montoya BM (2019) Undrained cyclic response of silty sands improved by microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 120:436–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.010
Zeng X (2006) Applications of piezoelectric sensors in geotechnical engineering. Smart Struct Syst 2(3):237–251. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2006.2.3.237
Zhang C, Lu N (2020) Unified effective stress equation for soil. J Eng Mech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001718
Zhang F, Ye WM, Wang Q, Chen YG, Chen B (2020) Effective stress incorporating osmotic suction and volume change behavior of compacted GMZ01 bentonite. Acta Geotech 15(7):1925–1934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00906-7
Zhao Q, Li L, Li C, Li M, Amini F, Zhang H (2014) Factors affecting improvement of engineering properties of MICP treated soil catalyzed by bacteria and urease. J Mat Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001013
Zhao H, Zhao M, Zhu C (2016) Reliability-based optimization of geotechnical engineering using the artificial bee colony algorithm. KSCE J Civ Eng 20(5):1728–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0117-6
Zhong Y, Tao JJ (2022) Bio-inspired vibrational wireless underground communication system. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 14(4):1042–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.06.005
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Human and animal rights
The study does not involve human participants and/or animals.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jain, S., Mishra, P.N., Tiwari, S. et al. Biological perspectives in geotechnics: theoretical developments. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 22, 1093–1130 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09671-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09671-2