Skip to main content
Log in

Text structure and patterns of cohesion in narrative texts written by adults with a history of language impairment

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines text structure and patterns of cohesion in stories written by a group of adults with a history of childhood language impairment. The study aimed to extend our knowledge of writing difficulties in this group by building upon a study that examined clause level phenomena (Smith-Lock, Nickels, & Mortensen, this issue). Ten adults with a history of Language Impairment and 30 control participants were asked to write the story of Cinderella. Stories were analyzed for their generic structure and cohesion resources, both of which contribute to the organization and coherence of a text. Results revealed that patterns of text organization at the level of generic structure and measures of cohesion did not distinguish the performance of writers with a history of Language Impairment from the comparison group. A wide range of lexico-grammatical skills was evident within the Language Impaired group, with few individuals with Language Impairment falling outside the normal range of performance. It is suggested that generic structure and cohesion are a relative strength in the writing of adults with Language Impairment, within the constraints of their lexical and grammatical skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. When calculating relevant tokens, the initial token and all related subsequent tokens (grammatical & lexical) are included in the relevant token count.

  2. When calculating the lexical and grammatical tokens which form chains, the initial token is excluded because there may be a number of chains associated with it, e.g. Cinderella- (Initial token) may have a related repetition chain (Cinderella), a reference chain (she, her), a super/subordinate chain (young girl/Cinderella; Cinderella/foot;). Therefore, including the initial token could artificially inflate the count.

References

  • Bamberg, M. (1987). The acquisition of narratives. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M., & Clarkson, B. (2003). Written language as a window into residual language deficits: A study of children with persistent and residual speech and language impairments. Cortex, 39, 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2000). Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide (2nd ed.). Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (Eds.). (1997). Genre and institutions: social processes in the workplace and school. York: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derewianka, B. (Ed.). (1992). Language assessment in primary classrooms. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, A. (1986). Cinderella/by Charles Perrault; retold by Amy Ehrlich. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C., Raphael, T., Fear, K., & Anderson, L. (1988). Students’ metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 1I(1), 18–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C., & Thomas, C. (1987). Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 10(2), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman-Stern, R. B., Ulatowska, H. K., Baker, T., & DeLacoste, C. (1984). Disruption of written language in aphasia: A case study. Brain and Language, 22, 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., Baddeley, A. D., & Emslie, H. (1994). The children’s test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2, 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillam, R. B., & Johnston, J. R. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303–1315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, N. (1991). Disorders of written expression. In A. M. Bain, L. L. Bailet & L. Moats (Eds.), Written language disorders: Theory into practice (pp. 65–97). Austin Texas: Pro-ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, N., & Hoy, C. (1990). Referencing: The cohesive use of pronouns in the written narratives of college underprepared writers, nondisabled writers and writers with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 557–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D., Brown, G. D. A., Larsen, S. C., & Wiederholt, J. L. (1993). Test of adolescent and adult language-3. Austin Texas: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J., Burns, A., Joyce, H., Brosnan, D., & Gerot, L. (1992). English for social purposes. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1996). The nursery tale as genre. In D. Butt, C. Cloran & G. Williams (Eds.), Ways of saying: Ways of meaning. Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (pp. 51–72). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston naming test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liles, B., Duffy, R., Merritt, D., & Purcell, S. (1995). Measurement of narrative discourse in children with language disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 415–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1985). Factual writing. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, L. (2004a). Perspectives on functional writing following acquired brain Impairment. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 6(1), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, L. (2004b). Assessing the functional writing abilities of people with aphasia. ACQuiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing, 6(2), 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, W. M. (2003). Does the choice of stimulus affect the complexity of children’s oral narratives? Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 5(2), 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plante, E., Shenkman, K., & Clark, M. (1996). Classification of adults for family studies of developmental language disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39, 661–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, V. A., Patchell, F. C., Coggins, T. E., & Hand, L. S. (2007). Informativeness of the spoken narratives of younger and older adolescents with specific language impairment and their counterparts with normal language. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 953–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. L., Haney, K. R., & Wexler, K. (1998). Family histories of children with specific language impairment who show extended optimal infinitives. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 419–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lock, K. M., & Nickels, L. A. (2005). Writing skills of adults with a history of specific-Language-Impairment. Acquiring Knowledge in Speech Language and Hearing, 7, 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lock, K. M., & Nickels, L. (2006). Does SLI in childhood lead to writing difficulties in adulthood? Speech Pathology Australia 2006 National Conference, Fremantle.

  • Smith-Lock, K. M., & Nickels, L., & Mortensen, L. (this issue). Story writing skills of adults with a history of Language-Impairment. Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9138-6.

  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedie (Ed.), New direction in discourse processing (pp. 53–119). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallal, P., Hirsch, L. S., Realpe-Bonilla, T., Miller, S., Brzustowicz, L. M., Bartlett, C., et al. (2001). Familial aggregation in specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1172–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1981). Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and Talk (pp. 177–195). Washington, PC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. M., & Proctor, A. (2002). Written discourse of adolescents with closed head injury. Brain Injury, 16, 1011–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. (2000). Writing strategies instruction for expository essays for adolescents with and without leaning disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B., Wong, R., & Blenkisop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of composing problems in learning-disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 12, 300–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an Australian Research Council small grant and a Macquarie University Research Development Grant. Lyndsey Nickels was supported by an NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship. The authors wish to thank the participants for their time and cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynne Mortensen.

Appendixes

Appendixes

Table 4 Obligatory and optional elements of the Cinderella tale drawn from the classic Perrault version (Ehrlich, 1986)
Table 5 Example 1 depicts Language Impaired group participant P7’s text, which included all obligatory elements of the narrative despite significant problems with lexicogrammar
Table 6 Example 2 depicts Language Impaired group participant P6’s text which omitted 2 obligatory elements (3 & 8), but included one optional element—Placement
Table 7 Example 3 presents comparison group participant C26’s text where one obligatory structural element is omitted (4), and one element (3*) is both incomplete and out of sequence
Table 8 Examples of the different lexical categories selected by the Language Impaired and comparison groups

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mortensen, L., Smith-Lock, K. & Nickels, L. Text structure and patterns of cohesion in narrative texts written by adults with a history of language impairment. Read Writ 22, 735–752 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9150-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9150-x

Keywords

Navigation