Skip to main content
Log in

To tell a story, to write it: developmental patterns of narrative skills from preschool to first grade

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this 1-year longitudinal study, the authors explored the development of narrative skills between the oral and written form. The authors aimed to assess the predictive power of textual narrative competence on early narrative text writing skills taking into account the impact of spelling ability. Eighty children (M age = 5.3 years, age range = 4.9–5.7 years; SD = 0.29) were followed longitudinally until entering the first grade of primary school. During kindergarten, they were tested with an oral story production task and in first grade with a written story production task. Narratives were evaluated in terms of structure, cohesion and consistency. In the first grade, children were also submitted to a dictation task to evaluate their spelling competence. Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed in order to examine narrative competence development, also considering gender differences, and regression analyses were implemented to evaluate the predictive capability of textual abilities expressed by oral narratives on textual abilities expressed by writing. The results showed some significant differences when scores in kindergarten were compared to scores in primary school. Moreover, the ability to tell well-structured, cohesive and consistent stories predicts the ability to write stories with the same qualities in the sample of participants without spelling difficulty. Instead, the predictive link is not apparent considering those children with difficulties in orthographic ability. This research allows us to reflect about how the medium of writing might interfere, on the basis of the level of mastery, with the opportunity to express narrative skills in the transition from the oral to written code. The central role of writing instrument functionality opens the way to practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: thinking and learning about print. Cambridge: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelelli, P., Notarnicola, A., Judica, A., Zoccolotti, P., & Luzzatti, P. (2010). Spelling impairments in Italian dyslexic children: phenomenological changes in primary school. Cortex, 46, 1299–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babayigit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2011). Modelling the relationships between cognitive-linguistic skills and literacy skills: new insight from a transparent orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, M. G. W. (1987). The acquisition of narratives: learning to use language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, C. (1994). Spelling routes (or roots or routes). In G. D. A. Brown & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: theory, process and intervention (pp. 27–49). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., Dale, P. S., & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Handbook of child language, chapter 4. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. (2000). Development of language by hand and its connections to language by ear, mouth, and eye. Topics of Language Disorders, 20, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., & Fuller, F. (1992). Gender differences in orthographic, verbal and compositional fluency: implications for assessing writing disabilities in primary grade children. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., & Graham, S. (1998). Language by hand: a synthesis of a decade of research on handwriting. Handwriting Review, 12, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Mizokawa, D., & Bragg, R. (1991). Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. R., Perfetti, C. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A., Vaughan, L., & Hansen, J. (1998). Beginning readers’ use of orthographic analogies in word reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 108–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chliounaki, K., & Bryant, P. (2007). How children learn about morphological spelling rules. Child Development, 78, 1360–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (2000). Dual routes from print to speech and dual routes from print to meaning: some theoretical issues. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, J. Pynte, & D. Heller (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 475–492). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Rasile, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damico, J. S., & Ball, M. J. (2008). Clinical sociolinguistics. In The handbook in clinical linguistics (pp. 107–129). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1995). Dictation: Applications to writing for students with learning disabilities. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 9, pp. 227–247). Greenwich: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decreto Legislativo 30 giugno (2003) n.196. “Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali”. Pubblicato nella Gazzetta Ufficiale, n.174 del 29 luglio 2003 – Supplemento Ordinario n.123.

  • Englehard, G., Walker, E. V., Gordon, B., & Gabrielson, S. (1994). Writing tasks and gender: Influences on writing quality of black and white students. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. A., Shaw, D., & Bell, M. (2000). Home literacy activities and their influence on early literacy skills. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marschall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: L.E.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1999). The role of text production skills in writing development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 75–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink-Chorzempa, B. (2002). Contributions of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing process. In L. W. Gregge & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale: Lea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S. R., Roberts, J. E., Nelson, L., Zeisel, S., & Fannin, D. K. (2010). Preschool predictors of narrative writing skills in elementary. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D., & Christensen, C. (1999). The relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49.

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–72). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughton, J., & Morris, N. (1989). Story grammar knowledge of learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., Share, D. L., & Shatil, E. (1996). A qualitative-quantitative study of preschool writing: Its development and contribution to school literacy. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 271–293). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, H. S., Voeten, M. J. M., Vauras, M. M. S., & Poskiparta, E. H. (2001). Predicting writing skill development with word recognition and preschool readiness skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 643–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, M., Maddux, C., & Dereshiwsky, M. (1990). Story grammar and comprehension and production of narrative prose by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 190–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notarnicola, A., Angelelli, P., Judica, A., & Zoccolotti, P. (2012). The development of spelling skills in a shallow orthography: the case of the Italian language. Reading and Writing, 25, 1171–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processing in written composition. Memory & Cognition, 30, 594–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsolini, M., Fanari, R., Tosi, V., De Nigris, B., & Carrier, R. (2006). From phonological recoding to lexical reading: a longitudinal study on reading development in Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 576–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. E. (1986). Lexical but non-semantic spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 341–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Accorti Gamannossi, B., & Vezzani, C. (2009). Emergent literacy and learning to write: a predictive model for Italian language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Accorti Gamannossi, B., & Vezzani, C. (2012). Emergent literacy and early writing skills. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 173, 330–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Tolchinsky-Landsmann, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: a comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language, 29, 419–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Written composition. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (2005). Learning to write. In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 233–273). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: a five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L. R., & Hudson, J. A. (1991). Tell me a make-believe story: coherence and cohesion in young children’s picture-elicited narratives. Developmental Psychology, 27, 960–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L. R., & Hudson, J. A. (1997). Coherence and cohesion in children’s stories. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships. Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 23–48). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiel G, Cregan Á., McGough A., & Archer P. (2012). Oral language in early childhood and primary education (3–8 years). National Council for Curriculum and Assessment 24, Merrion Square, Dublin 2.

  • Singer, B., & Bashir, A. (2004). Developmental variations in writing composition skills. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy development and disorders (pp. 559–582). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinillo, A. G., & Pinto, G. (1994). Children’s narratives under different conditions: a comparative study. British Journal of Development Psychology, 12, 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1982). Children’s concept of time: The development of a story schema. In W. J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struthers, L., Lapadat, J. C., & MacMillan, P. D. (2013). Assessing cohesion in children’s writing: development of a checklist. Assessing Writing, 18, 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzby, E. (1985). Children’s emergent reading of favorite storybooks: a developmental study. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 458–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 358–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. (2000). The spelling process. In B. Rapp (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind: a handbook of cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 263–289). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tressoldi, P., & Cornoldi, C. (2000). Batteria per la valutazione della scrittura e della competenza ortografica nella scuola dell’obbligo. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2002). Emergent literacy: development from pre-readers to readers. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 179–191). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. (2013). Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil. World Medical Journal, 5, 199–202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Bigozzi.

Additional information

Lucia Bigozzi. Department of Education and Psychology, University of Florence, via di San Salvi 12, Complesso di San Salvi Padiglione 26, 50135 Florence, Italy. E-mail: lbigozzi@unifi.it, lucia.bigozzi@unifi.it, Tel.: +39 055 2755010

Current themes of research:

Development of metacognition and theory of mind. Communicative and linguistic development, with special interest in lexical competence development and its relations with reading comprehension. Learning disabilities: dyslexia’s and disorthography’s predictors. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): psychodiagnosis, educative treatment and school integration interventions. Teaching and learning processes: effectiveness of teaching methods. School integration of disabled children.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

Pezzica, S., Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., & Vezzani, C. (2015). Where is my attention? Children’s metaknowledge expressed through drawings. Educational Psychology. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.1003035.

Bigozzi, L., Tarchi, C., Pinto, G., & Accorti Gamannossi B. (2015). Predicting dyslexia in a transparent orthography from grade-one literacy skills: a prospective cohort study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, ISSN:1057-3569.

Pinto, G., Tarchi, C., & Bigozzi, L. (2015). The relationship between oral and written narratives: A three-year longitudinal study of narrative cohesion, coherence, and structure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 551–569. doi:10.1111/bjep.12091.

Bigozzi, L., Tarchi, C., Pezzica, S., & Pinto G. (2014). Evaluating the predictive impact of an emergent literacy model on dyslexia in Italian children: a four-year prospective cohort study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3, 1–14. doi:10.1177/0022219414522708.

Pinto, G., Bigozzi, G., Accorti Gamannossi, B., & Vezzani, C. (2012). Emergent literacy and early writing skills. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 173(3), 330–354.

Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Accorti Gamannossi, B., & Vezzani, C. (2009). Emergent literacy and learning to write: a predictive model for Italian language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1), 725–742.

Bigozzi, L., Biggeri, A., Boschi, F., Conti, C., & Fiorentini, C. (2002). Children “scientists” know the reason why and they are “poets” too. Non-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a strategy aimed at improving the learning of scientific concepts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17, 343–362.

Giulia Vettori. Department of Education and Psychology, University of Florence, via di San Salvi 12, Complesso di San Salvi Padiglione 26, 50135 Florence, Italy. E-mail: gvettori@live.it

Current themes of research:

Emergent literacy processes in preschool children and their development during alphabetisation processed, with special interests in textual competence. Acquisition of writing and its relations with narrative competence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bigozzi, L., Vettori, G. To tell a story, to write it: developmental patterns of narrative skills from preschool to first grade. Eur J Psychol Educ 31, 461–477 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0273-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0273-6

Keywords

Navigation