Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Graphite Content on Mechanical Properties and Friction Coefficient of Reinforced Aluminum Composites

  • SINTERED METALS AND ALLOYS
  • Published:
Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics Aims and scope

Aluminum matrix composites (AMCs) reinforced with different content (wt.%) of graphite (Gr) reinforcing particles are synthesized by stir casting technique. The fraction of reinforcing particles ranges from 5 to 15 wt.% at 5 wt.% intervals. Microstructures, density, porosity, hardness, tensile strength, and friction coefficient of fabricated particulate reinforced AMCs are studied. The scanning electron microscopy reveals a non-uniform distribution of reinforcing particles in the aluminum metal matrix. A non-uniform distribution of reinforcing particles is also confirmed by the elemental maps of C (Gr) present in particulate reinforced AMCs. The density of particulate reinforced AMCs decreases from 2.69 to 2.55 g/cm3, while the porosity increases from 0.37 to 2.45% with an increase in the fraction of reinforcing particles in the aluminum matrix from 0 to 15 wt.%, respectively. Both the hardness and ultimate tensile strength are reduced from 49.5 to 42 HV and 161.5 to 150 MPa, respectively, with a reduction in elongation from 8.6 to 6.5% with an increase in the volume fraction of reinforcing particles in the aluminum matrix from 0 to 15 wt.%, respectively. The average coefficient of friction reduced from 0.45 to 0.22 with an increase in the volume fraction of reinforcing particles in the aluminum matrix from 0 to 15 wt.%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Bajaj, Mechanical Behaviour of Aluminum Based Metal Matrix Composites Reinforced with SiC and Alumina, ME Thesis, Thapar University Patiala (2010).

  2. J. Hemanth, “Quartz (SiO2p) reinforced chilled metal matrix composite (CMMC) for automobile applications,” Mater. Design, 30, No. 2, 323–329 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. C. Feng, L. Geng, P. Q. Zheng, et al., “Fabrication and characteristic of Al-based hybrid composite reinforced with tungsten oxide particle and aluminum borate whisker by squeeze casting,” Mater. Design, 29, No. 10, 2023–2026 (2008).

  4. C. S. Ramesh, R. Keshavamurthy, B. H. Channabasappa, and A. Abrar, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ni–P coated Si3N4 reinforced Al6061 composites,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 502, Nos. 1–2, 99–106 (2009).

  5. H. R. Lashgari, A. R. Sufizadeh, and M. Emamy, “The effect of strontium on the microstructure and wear properties of A356–10% B4C cast composites,” Mater. Design, 31, No. 4, 2187–2195 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Sharma, D. Khanduja, and S. Sharma, “Tribological and mechanical behavior of particulate aluminum matrix composites,” J. Rein. Plas. Comp., 33, No. 23, 2192–2202 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. W. Cylne, “Metal Matrix Composites,” in: Comprehensive Composite Materials II, Vol. 3, Elsevier, PA, USA (2000) p.6000.

  8. A. Jokinen and V. Rauta, Manufacturing and Properties of Aluminum Alloy Matrix Composites, Final Report, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Metallurgy Laboratory, Espoo (1992), p. 26.

  9. Encyclopedia of Materials, Science and Technology, Elsevier (2001), pp. 1–20.

  10. K. R. Ravi, V. M. Sreekumar, R. M. Pillai, et al., “Optimization of mixing parameters through a water model for metal matrix composites synthesis,” Mater. Design, 28, No. 3, 871–881 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. M. Shorowordi, T. Laoui, A. S. M. A. Haseeb, et al., “Microstructure and interface characteristics of B4C, SiC, and Al2O3 reinforced Al matrix composites: a comparative study,” J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 142, No. 3, 738–743 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kerti and F. Toptan, “Microstructural variations in cast B4C-reinforced aluminum matrix composites (AMCs),” Mater. Letters, 62, Nos. 8–9, 1215–1218 (2008).

  13. M. K. Surappa, “Microstructure evolution during solidification of DRMMC (discontinuously reinforced metal matrix composites): State of Art,” J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 63, 325–333 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Mortensen, Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Metals and Ceramic Compounds, Riso National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark (1988), p. 141.

  15. A. C. Pai, K. G. Satyanarayana, and P. S. Robi, “Effect of chemical and ultrasound treatment on the tensile properties of carbon fibers,” Mater. Sci. Lett., 11, No. 11, 779–781 (1992).

  16. M. Kok, “Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminum alloy composites,” J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 161, No. 3, 381–387 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Sharma, S. Sharma, and D. Khanduja, “Parametric study of dry sliding wear behavior of hybrid metal matrix composite produced by a novel process,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 46, No. 7, 3260–3270 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Sharma, S. Sharma, and D. Khanduja, “Production and some properties of Si3N4 reinforced aluminum alloy composites,” J. Asian Ceram. Soc., 3, No. 3, 352–359 (2015).

  19. G. B. V. Kumar, C. S. P. Rao, and N. Selvaraj, “Studies on mechanical and dry sliding wear of Al6061–SiC composites,” Comp. Part B: Eng., 43, No. 3, 1185–1191 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Sahin, “Prepration and some properties of SiC particle reinforced aluminum alloy composites,” Mater. Design, 24, No. 8, 671–679 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Sahin and M. Acilar, “Production and properties of SiCp reinforced aluminum alloy composites,” Comp. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufac., 34, No. 8, 709–718 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. V. S. Aigbodion and S. B. Hassan, “Effect of Silicon carbide reinforcement on microstructure and properties of cast Al–Si–Fe/SiC particulate composites,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 447, Nos. 1–2, 355–360 (2007).

  23. A. M. Hassan, G. M. Tashtoush, and A. K. J. Ahmed, “Effect of graphite and/or silicon carbide particles addition on the hardness and surface roughness of Al–4 wt.% Mg alloy,” J. Comp. Mater., 41, No. 4, 453–465 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Akhlaghi and Z. A. Bidaki, “Influence of graphite content on dry sliding and oil impregnated sliding wear behaviour of Al2024–Gr composite produced by in situ powder metallurgy method,” Wear, 266, Nos. 1–2, 37–45 (2009).

  25. A. Baradeswaran and A. E. Perumal, “Study on mechanical and wear properties of Al 7075/Al2O3/graphite hybrid composites,” Comp. Part B: Eng., 56, 464–471 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Sharma, S. Sharma, and D. Khanduja, “A study on microstructure of aluminum matrix composites,” J. Asian Ceram. Soc., 3, No. 3, 240–244 (2015).

  27. S. N. Prashant, N. Madeva, and V. Auradi, “Prepration and evaluation of mechanical and wear properties of 6061 Al reinforced with graphite particulate metal matrix composite,” Int. J. Metall. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2, No. 3, 85–95 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. Sharma, D. Khanduja, and S. Sharma, “Dry sliding wear investigation of Al6082/Gr metal matrix composites by response surface methodology,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., 5, No. 1, 29–36 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Suresha and B. K. Sridhara, “Effect of silicon carbide particulates on wear resistance of graphitic aluminum matrix composites,” Mater. Design, 31, No. 9, 4470–4477 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Sharma, K. Paliwal, R. K. Garg, et al., “A study on wear behavior of Al6101/graphite composites,” J. Asian Ceram. Soc., 5, No. 1, 42–48 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Hashim, L. Looney, and M. S. J. Hashmi, “Metal matrix composites: production by the stir casting method,” J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 92–93, 1–7 (1999).

  32. J. Hashim, L. Looney, M. S. J. Hashmi, “Properties of alumina particulate reinforced aluminum alloy produced by pressure die casting,” Mater. Design, 27, No. 8, 676–683 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S. A. Sajjadi, H. R. Ezatpour, and H. Beygi, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Al2O3 micro and nano composites fabricated by stir casting,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 528, Nos. 29–30, 8765–8771 (2011).

  34. ASTM E8 / E8M-16a, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Sharma.

Additional information

Published in Poroshkovaya Metallurgiya, Vol. 56, Nos. 5–6 (515), pp. 35–45, 2017.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, P., Sharma, S., Kumar Garg, R. et al. Effect of Graphite Content on Mechanical Properties and Friction Coefficient of Reinforced Aluminum Composites. Powder Metall Met Ceram 56, 264–272 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11106-017-9894-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11106-017-9894-4

Keywords

Navigation