Skip to main content
Log in

A biomechanical model for maize root lodging

  • REGULAR ARTICLE
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Root lodging is a structural failure of the root-soil anchorage system in a plant that adversely affects its yield. It is a complex phenomenon that depends strongly on both crop genetics and environmental factors. An accurate biomechanical model to predict root lodging would disentangle the component factors and improve development of lodging resistant plants, thereby reducing the constraint of root lodging on crop yields.

Methods

We developed a biomechanical model that employs an engineering safety factor approach to quantify root lodging resistance as the ratio of anchorage supply and wind demand. We also conducted field experiments to parametrize the model for a sensitivity analysis and validate the model for predictive accuracy.

Results

The sensitivity analysis revealed primary, secondary, and tertiary factors for root lodging. The primary factors consisted of root angle, structural rooting depth, soil strength, and wind speed. The secondary factors were plant height, ear height, leaf area, stalk taper, ear mass, and leaf drag. Tertiary factors were stalk diameter and leaf number. The validation analysis found the model predictions compared well with data collected from three natural lodging events, with a goodness-of-fit of 0.58.

Conclusions

The model effectively described a collection of natural lodging events, giving confidence in its predictive accuracy as well as the relative phenotypic and envirotypic influence factors determined in the sensitivity analysis. There are significant opportunities for model improvement, perhaps most significantly in the phenomenological understanding of the physical process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Not to be confused with goose-necking, a biological process through which above-ground plant organs recover their verticality following a root lodging event through phototrophic growth.

  2. ‘Fully intact’ refers to plants whose roots systems have not been reduced by root worm feeding.

  3. Note: results were obtained for a single growth medium, a reconstituted mixture of sandy loam top soil, peat, and sand in 7:3:2 volumetric proportion (Goodman and Ennos 1999).

  4. The difference in material response is of more consequence for stalk material failure, provisioned for a future version of the model.

  5. Each node was assigned a thickness value of 6.4 mm.

  6. Briefly: in considering boundary value problems, the Finite Element method discretizes the domain into a mesh of interconnected finite elements. The vertices that define the coordinates of the elements are called nodes. They should not be confused with stalk nodes.

  7. See Horn and Lebert (1994) and Wulfsohn et al. (1998) for discussion of total versus effective stress measures as pertains to agricultural soils.

  8. Ear height was not measured, as the plants had lodged before development of any significant ear.

  9. Ear height was included in the sensitivity analysis to gauge its effect, as well as that of ear mass. It was not included in the validation analysis because the plants were still in vegetative states when lodging occurred.

  10. It is noted that these results incorporated both root and stem lodging of wheat plants.

References

  • ASTM D2573 (2015) Standard Test Method for Field Vane Shear Test in Saturated Fine-Grained Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D3441 (2016) Standard Test Method for Mechanical Cone Penetration Testing of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D5778 (2012) Standard Test Method for Electronic Friction Cone and Piezocone Penetration Testing of Soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker CJ (1995) The development of a theoretical model for the windthrow of plants. J Theor Biol 175:355–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker CJ, Berry PM, Spink JH, Sylvester-Bradley R, Griffin JM, Scott RK, Clare RW (1998) A method for the assessment of the risk of wheat lodging. J Theor Biol 194:587–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker CJ, Sterling M, Berry P (2014) A generalised model of crop lodging. J Theor Biol 363:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bathe KJ (2014) Finite element procedures. KJ Bathe, Watertown

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry PM, Griffin JM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Scott RK, Spink JH, Baker CJ, Clare RW (2000) Controlling plant form through husbandry to minimize lodging in wheat. Field Crop Res 67:59–81

  • Berry PM, Sterling M, Baker CJ, Spink J, Sparkes DL (2003) A calibrated model of wheat lodging compared with field measurements. Agric For Meteorol 119:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry PM, Sterling M, Spink JH, Baker CJ, Sylvester-Bradley R, Mooney SJ, Tams AR, Ennos AR (2004) Understanding and Reducing Lodging in Cereals. Adv Agron 84:217–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry PM, Sterling M, Mooney SJ (2006) Development of a model of lodging for barley. J Agron Crop Sci 192:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn P, Petty JA (1988) An assessment of the static and dynamic factors involved in windthrow. Forestry 61:29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter PR, Hudelson KD (1988) Influence of simulated wind lodging on corn growth and grain yield. J Prod Agric 1:295–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutts MP (1983) Root architecture and tree stability. Plant Soil 71:171–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook MJ, Ennos AR (1993) The mechanics of root lodging in winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. J Exp Bot 44:1219–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dassault Systèmes (2014) Abaqus User’s Manual v6.14. Simulia, Providence

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennos AR, Crook MJ, Grimshaw C (1993) The anchorage mechanics of maize, Zea mays. J Exp Bot 44:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flesch TK, Grant RH (1991) The translation of turbulent wind energy to individual corn plant motion during senescence. Boundary Layer Meteorology 55:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman AM, Ennos AR (1996) A comparative study of the response of the roots and shoots of sunflower and maize to mechanical stimulation. J Exp Bot 47:1499–1507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman AM, Ennos AR (1999) The effects of soil bulk density on the morphology and anchorage mechanics of the root systems of sunflower and maize. Ann Bot 83:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin (1998) Assessing lodging risk in winter wheat. PhD dissertation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Horn R, Lebert M (1994) Soil compaction in crop production. In: Sloane BD, van Ouwerkerk C (eds) Soil Compaction in Crop Production. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 45–69

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Song F, Liu F, Zhui X, Xu H (2012) Effect of Planting Density on Root Lodging Resistance and its Relationship to Nodal Root Growth Characteristics in Maize (Zea mays L.) J Agric Sci 4:182–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu SS, Willmarth WW (1974) Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 670:481–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzur ME, Hall AJ, Chimenti CA (2014) Root lodging tolerance in Helianthus annus (L.): associations with morphological and mechanical attributes of roots. Plant Soil 2014:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vazquez P (2016) Crop lodging induced by wind and rain. Agric For Meteorol 228-229:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller LA (2005) Structural dynamics and resonance in plants with nonlinear stiffness. J Theor Biol 2005:511–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niklas KJ (1992) Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function. U Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver HR, Mayhead GJ (1974) Wind measurements in a pine forest during a destructive gale. Forestry 47:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinthus MJ (1973) Lodging in wheat, barley, and oats: the phenomenon, its causes, and preventive measures. Adv Agron 25:209–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Thom AS (1981) Turbulence in and above plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13:97–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Bound-Layer Meteorol 78:351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DJ, Smith SL, Gardunia BG, Cook DD (2014) An improved method for accurate phenotyping of corn stalk strength. Crop Sci 54:2038–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RH, Den Hartog G, King KM, Thurtell GW (1974) Measurements of mean wind flow and three-dimensional turbulence intensity within a mature corn canopy. Agric Meteorol 13:419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spike BP, Tollefson JJ (1991) Yield response of corn subjected to Western Corn Root worm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) infestation and lodging. J Econ Entomol 5:1585–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sposaro MM, Berry PM, Sterling M, Hall AJ, Chimenti CA (2010) Modelling root and stem lodging in sunflower. Field Crop Res 119:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamp P, Kiel C (1992) Root morphology of maize and its relationship to root lodging. J Agron Crop Sci 168:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling M, Baker CJ, Berry PM, Wade A (2003) An experimental investigation of the lodging of wheat. Agric For Meteorol 119:149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A, Atger RC, Bengough AG, Fourcaud T, Sidle RC (2009) Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides. Plant Soil 324:1–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tritton DJ (1988) Physical fluid dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Forell G, Robertson D, Lee SY, Cook DD (2015) Preventing lodging in bioenergy crops: a biomechanical analysis of maize stalks suggests a new approach. J Exp Bot 66:4367–4371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron LJ (1977) The shear resistance of root-permeated homogeneous and stratified soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:843–849

  • Wilson NR, Shaw RH (1977) A higher order closure model for canopy flow. J Appl Meteorol 16:1197–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulfsohn D, Adams BA, Fredlund DG (1998) Triaxial testing of agricultural soils. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 69:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Matt Smalley, Ted Diehl, Neil Hausmann, Igor Coelho, Alan Wedgewood.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip F. Brune.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Alexia Stokes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brune, P.F., Baumgarten, A., McKay, S.J. et al. A biomechanical model for maize root lodging. Plant Soil 422, 397–408 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3457-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3457-9

Keywords

Navigation