Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 447–498 | Cite as

Successive-cyclic case assignment: Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking

Article

Abstract

In recent literature, a debate has arisen between two theories of the calculation and realization of morphological case. The more commonly held Agree model states that all case features are assigned to nominals by nearby functional heads. Given a designated case-assigning functional head F, and a nominal α that is c-commanded by F, the case-marking associated with F will be assigned to α (Chomsky 2000, 2001). An alternative view, the Dependent Case model, holds that case is assigned to nominals given their structural relationship to one another. The case a nominal bears is dependent on the presence of other nominals within a defined domain (e.g. Yip et al. 1987; Marantz 1991; Bittner and Hale 1996). In this paper, I bring the phenomenon of Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking to bear on the current debate over Agree versus Dependent Case models. I argue that nominative-nominative stacking is incompatible with an Agree model of case-assignment. However, an emended Dependent Case model is well-suited to capture nominative-nominative case-stacking.

Keywords

Case stacking Case alternation Dependent case Agree Movement Korean 

References

  1. Andrews, Avery D. 1982. The representation of case in modern Icelandic. In The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. Joan Bresnan, 427–503. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  2. Baker, Mark C. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415. Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Mark C. 2012. Types of crosslinguistic variation in case assignment. Ms., Rutgers University. Google Scholar
  4. Baker, Mark C. 2015. Case: Its principles and its parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, Mark C., and Nadya Vinokurova. 2010. Two modalities of case assignment case in Sakha. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 593–642. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Béjar, Susana, and Milan Rezac. 2009. Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 35–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and theta theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bittner, Maria, and Kenneth Hale. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–68. Google Scholar
  9. Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi theory: Phi-features across interfaces and modules, eds. Daniel Harbour et al., 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  10. Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and Phil Branigan. 2006. Eccentric agreement and multiple case checking. In Ergativity: Emerging issues, eds. Alana Johns et al.. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar
  11. Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and Susi Wurmbrand. 2005. The domain of agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 809–865. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Börjars, Kersti, and Nigel Vincent. 1997. Double case and the ‘wimpiness’ of morphology. Paper presented at Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG97), San Diego. Google Scholar
  13. Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 27–89. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chae, Hee-Rahk. 1991. The morphological status of nominal ‘particles’ in Korean. In Korean syntax and semantics: Linguistic Society of America (LSA) institute workshop, eds. Chungmin Lee and John Whitman. Thaehaksa. Google Scholar
  15. Cho, Choon-hak. 1975. The scope of negation in Korean. In The Korean language, ed. Ho-Min Sohn. Honolulu: Center for Korean Studies. Google Scholar
  16. Cho, Dong-in. 1994. Functional projections and verb movement. In Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics, ed. Young-Key Kim-Renaud. Stanford: CSLI. Google Scholar
  17. Cho, Young-mee Y., and Peter Sells. 1995. A lexical account of inflectional suffixes in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 119–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Choe, Hyon-sook. 1987a. Syntactic adjunction, A-chain and the ECP: Multiple identical case constructions in Korean. In North East Linguistic Society (NELS), eds. Joyce McDonough and Bernadette Plunkett. Vol. 17, 100–120. Google Scholar
  19. Choe, Hyon-sook. 1987b. Successive-cyclic rightward movement in Korean. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, ed. Susumu Kuno. Vol. II, 40–56. Seoul: Hanshin. Google Scholar
  20. Choe, Hyon-sook. 1995. Focus and topic movement in Korean and licensing. In Discourse configurational languages, ed. Katalin É. Kiss, 269–334. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  21. Choi, Jaeyoung. 2008. Economy in rightward movement: Evidence from Korean. Master’s thesis, Seoul National University. Google Scholar
  22. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Holland: Foris. Google Scholar
  23. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martin et al., 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  24. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael J. Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  25. Chung, Han Byul. 2012. i/ka marks focus. Paper presented at Japanese/Korean Linguistics 22, Tokyo. Google Scholar
  26. Deal, Amy Rose. 2013. Ergativity, 2nd edn. In International handbook on syntactic contemporary research, eds. Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  27. Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  28. Dikken, Marcel den. 2007. Phase extension: Contours of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 1–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fox, Danny, and David Pesetsky. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fukuda, Shin. 2006. Japanese passives, external arguments, and structural case. San Diego Linguistics Papers 2: 86–133. Google Scholar
  31. Gerdts, Donna B. 1991. Outline of a relational theory of case. In Simon Fraser working papers in linguistics, ed. Paul McFetridge. Vol. 1, 25–51. Google Scholar
  32. Gerdts, Donna B., and Cheong Youn. 1988. Korean psych constructions: Advancement or retreat? In Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS) 24, eds. Lynn MacLeod et al., 155–175. Google Scholar
  33. Gerdts, Donna B., and Cheong Youn. 1990. Non-nominative subjects in Korean. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, eds. Susumu Kuno et al. Vol. III, 235–248. Seoul: Hanshin. Google Scholar
  34. Gerdts, Donna B., and Cheong Youn. 1999. Case stacking and focus in Korean. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, eds. Susumu Kuno et al. Vol. VIII, 325–339. Seoul: Hanshin. Google Scholar
  35. Grimshaw, Jane. 2005. Words and structure. Stanford: CSLI. Google Scholar
  36. Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2000. Prolific peripheries: A radical view from the left. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland. Google Scholar
  37. Hagstrom, Paul. 1997. Scope interactions and phrasal movement in Korean negation. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, Vol. VII. Seoul: Hanshin. Google Scholar
  38. Han, Chung-hye, Jeffrey Lidz, and Julien Musolino. 2007. V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 1–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Han, Jeonghan. 1999. Morphosyntactic coding of information structure in Korean (multiple case marking, light verb construction, quantifier float): A Role and Reference Grammar account. Doctoral dissertation, SUNY Buffalo. Google Scholar
  40. Harbert, Wayne E., and Almeida J. Toribio. 1991. Nominative objects. In Cornell working papers in linguistics, eds. Almeida J. Toribio and Wayne E. Harbert. Vol. 9, 127–192. Google Scholar
  41. Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese. In MIT–Harvard joint conference (HUMIT) 2000, eds. Ora Matushansky et al., 67–80. Cambridge: MITWPL. Google Scholar
  42. Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: Agreement and clausal architecture. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar
  43. Hong, Ki-Sun. 1991. Argument selection and case marking in Korean. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. Google Scholar
  44. Horvath, Julia. 1995. Structural focus, structural case, and the notion of feature-assignment. In Discourse configurational languages, ed. Katalin É. Kiss, 28–64. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  45. Hyman, Larry M. 2003. Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. Yearbook of Morphology 2002: 245–281. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2007. Major phrase, focus intonation, multiple spell-out. The Linguistic Review 24: 137–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jo, Jung-Min. 2001. Case-particles in Korean are not focus-markers: A minimalist approach to the focus interpretation of case-marked NPs. Presented at the 11th Japanese/Korean linguistics conference, University of California, Santa Barbara. Google Scholar
  48. Jung, Yeun-jin, and Shigeru Miyagawa. 2004. Decomposing ditransitive verbs. In Proceedings of SICGG, 101–120. Google Scholar
  49. Kim, Kyumin. 2013. Non-locative syntax of locative experiencers. Ms., University of Calgary. Google Scholar
  50. Kim, Min-Joo 2001. Accusative adverbials in Korean: Delimiting phrase and case. Presented at the 23rd meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, New York. Google Scholar
  51. Kim, Soowon, and Joan Maling. 1998. Case assignment in the siphta-construction. In Description and explanation in Korean linguistics, ed. R. King, 133–168. Ithaca: East Asia Program, Cornell University. Google Scholar
  52. Ko, Eon-suk. 2000. A discourse analysis of the realization of objects in Korean. In Japanese/Korean linguistics, Vol. 9, 195–208. Stanford: CSLI. Google Scholar
  53. Ko, Heejong. 2005. Syntactic edges and linearization. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar
  54. Ko, Heejeong. 2007. Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 49–83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kornfilt, Jaklin, and Omer Preminger. 2015. Nominative as no case at all: An argument from raising-to-ACC in Sakha. In 9th workshop on Altaic formal linguistics, eds. Andrew Joseph and Esra Predolac, 109–120. Cambridge: MITWPL. Google Scholar
  56. Landau, Idan. 2010. The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  57. Lee, Duck-young. 2002. The function of the zero particle with special reference to spoken Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 645–682. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee, Hanjung. 2010. Explaining variation in Korean case ellipsis: Economy versus iconicity. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19: 291–318. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lee, Hanjung. 2011. Gradients in Korean case ellipsis: An experimental investigation. Lingua 121: 20–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lee, Hanjung, and Haejeong Choi. 2010. Focus types and subject-object asymmetry in Korean case ellipsis: A new look at focus effects. In Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC) 24, 213–222. Google Scholar
  61. Lee, Youngjoo. 2004. The syntax and semantics of focus particles. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar
  62. Legate, Julie Anne. 2004. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 506–516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 55–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Levin, Theodore, and Omer Preminger. 2015. Case in Sakha: Are two modalities really necessary? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 231–250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mahajan, Anoop. 1990. The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar
  66. Maling, Joan. 2009. The case tier: A hierarchical approach to morphological case. In The Oxford handbook of case, eds. Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer, 72–87. Google Scholar
  67. Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL), eds. Germán Westphal et al. Vol. 8, 234–253. Ithaca: CLC. Google Scholar
  68. Martin, Samuel. 1992. A reference grammar of Korean. Rutland: Charles E. Tuttle. Google Scholar
  69. Masunaga, Kiyoko. 1988. Case deletion and discourse context. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, ed. William J. Poser, 124–156. Google Scholar
  70. McCarthy, John. 2006. Morphology: Optimality theory. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, ed. Keith Brown, 308–316. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McFadden, Thomas. 2004. The position of morphological case in the derivation: A study on the syntax-morphology interface. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Google Scholar
  72. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1989. Structure and case marking in Japanese. San Diego: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  73. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2001. EPP, scrambling, and wh-in-situ. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael J. Kenstowicz, 293–338. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  74. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move: Unifying agreement-based and discourse configurational languages. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  75. Miyagawa, Shigeru, and Takae Tsujioka. 2004. Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 1–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nakamura, Wataru. 1996. Case spreading/stacking in Korean: Evidence for the macrorole tier. Presented at Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG96), Grenoble. Google Scholar
  77. Neeleman, Ad, and Hans van de Koot. 2006. Syntactic haplology. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 685–710. Malden: Blackwell. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. O’Grady, William. 1991. Categories and case: The sentence structure of Korean. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Park, Myung-Kwan. 1991. Experiencer movement and anaphor binding in causative psych-verbs in Korean. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics II, eds. Susumu Kuno et al., 381–393. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University. Google Scholar
  80. Park, Ki-seoung. 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of case marking in Korean: A Role and Reference Grammar account. Doctoral dissertation, SUNY Buffalo. Google Scholar
  81. Pesetsky, David. 2014. Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  82. Preminger, Omer. 2011. Agreement as a fallible operation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar
  83. Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Argument introducers. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rice, Keren. 2000. Morpheme order and semantic scope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Richards, Norvin. 2013. Lardil “case stacking” and the timing of case assignment. Syntax 16: 42–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar
  88. Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Long distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 69–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schütze, Carson T. 1996. Korean “case stacking” isn’t: Unifying noncase uses of case particles. In North East Linguistic Society (NELS), ed. K. Kusumoto. Vol. 26, 351–365. Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  90. Schütze, Carson T. 2001a. On Korean ‘case stacking’: The varied functions of the particles -ka and -lul. The Linguistic Review 18: 193–232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schütze, Carson T. 2001b. On the nature of default case. Syntax 4: 205–238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sells, Peter. 1995. Korean and Japanese morphology from a lexical perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 277–325. Google Scholar
  93. Sells, Peter. 1997. Positional constraints and faithfulness in morphology. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, Vol. 7. Google Scholar
  94. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1977. Grammatical relations and surface cases. Language 53: 789–809. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1999. Dative subject constructions twenty two years later. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29: 46–76. Google Scholar
  96. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1989. Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University. Google Scholar
  97. Sohn, Keun-won. 1995. Negative polarity items, scope, and economy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut. Google Scholar
  98. Suh, Jinhee. 1989. Scope interaction in negation. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, eds. Susumu Kuno et al. Vol. III. Seoul: Hanshin. Google Scholar
  99. Suh, Sungki. 1992. The distribution of topic- and nominative-marked phrases in Korean: The universality of IP structure. In Papers from the Fourth Student Conference on Linguistics, eds. Andrea Kathol and Jill Beckman, 207–221. Cambridge: MITWPL. Google Scholar
  100. Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. In Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, eds. David Adger et al., 261–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
  101. Takahashi, Shoichi, and Danny Fox. 2005. MaxElide and the re-binding problem. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 15. Google Scholar
  102. Tsutsui, Michio. 1984. Particle ellipsis in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Google Scholar
  103. Ura, Hiroyuki. 1996. Multiple feature-checking: A theory of grammatical function-splitting. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar
  104. Ura, Hiroyuki. 1999. Checking theory and dative subject constructions in Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 223–254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Urushibara, Saeko. 1991. Ey/eykey: A postposition or a case marker? Google Scholar
  106. Van Valin, Robert D. 2009. Case in role and reference grammar. In The Oxford handbook of case, eds. Andrej Machulkov and Andrew Spencer, 102–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  107. Woolford, Ellen. 1997. Four-way case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 679–728. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Yang, Dong-whee. 1999. Case features and case particles. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), eds. Sonya Bird et al. Vol. 18, 626–639. Google Scholar
  109. Yatabe, Shoichiro. 1999. Particle ellipsis and focus projection in Japanese. Language, Information, Text, Vol. 6, 79–104. Department of Language and Information Sciences, University of Tokyo. Google Scholar
  110. Yip, Moira, Joan Maling, and Ray Jackendoff. 1987. Case in tiers. Language 63: 217–250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Yoon, James Hye-Suk. 1996. Ambiguity of government and the chain condition. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 105–162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Yoon, James Hye-Suk. 2004. Non-nominative (major) subjects and case stacking in Korean. In Non-nominative subjects, eds. P. Bhoskaravao and Karumuri Venkata Subbarao. Vol. 2, 265–314. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Yoon, James Hye-suk. 2005. Non-morphological determination of nominal particle ordering in Korean. In Clitic and affix combinations: Theoretical perspectives, eds. Lorie Heggie and Francisco Ordonez, 239–282. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Yoon, James Hye-suk. 2007. Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 615–653. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Yoon, James Hye-suk, and Jeongme Yoon. 1991. Chain condition, ambiguity of government and derivational grammars. In North East Linguistic Society (NELS), ed. Tim Sherer. Vol. 21, 415–429. Google Scholar
  116. Yoon, Jong-Yurl. 1989. On the multiple ka and lul constructions in Korean. Google Scholar
  117. Youn, Cheong. 1990. A relational analysis of Korean multiple nominative constructions. Seoul: Hanshin. Google Scholar
  118. Youn, Cheong. 1995. A relational analysis of case stacking. Hyentaynwunpepyenkwu 6: 121–147. Google Scholar
  119. Youn, Cheong. 1998. Case stacking revisited. Studies in Modern Grammar 14: 125–149. Google Scholar
  120. Yun, Suyeon. 2013. Post-verbal arguments in Korean: Syntax, prosody, and information structure. Ms., MIT. Google Scholar
  121. Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1985. Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations