Skip to main content
Log in

Ambiguity of government and the Chain Condition

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I examine the Chain Condition (Chomsky 1981, 1986a) and show that the requirement that the head of an A-Chain be its unique Case position cannot be maintained when a range of data from different languages is examined. In its place, I propose the Revised Chain Condition (RCC), which allows A-Chains to contain more than one Case-marked position as long as each position within the Chain is uniquely Case-marked. Unlike the Chain Condition, which resists successful deduction from independent postulates, the RCC can be derived in its entirety from plausible primitives of the grammar. I test the predictions of the RCC with respect to a variety of theoretical constructs, showing them to be confirmed. The implications of RCC for the conception of Chains and movement in the minimalist approach (Chomsky 1992, 1994, Chomsky and Lasnik 1991, and Lasnik 1993) are discussed. It is argued that a careful reading of the minimalist literature turns out to support the RCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Authier, Jean-Marc: 1991, ‘V-governed Expletives, Case Theory, and the Projection Principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 721–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1985, ‘The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanations’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 373–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana: 1988, ‘The Case of Unaccusatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi: 1988, ‘Psych Verbs and Theta Theory’, NLLT 5, 291–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Besten, Hans: 1983, ‘The Ergative Hypothesis and Free Word Order in Dutch and German’, in J. Toman (ed.), Studies in German Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 23–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John: 1993, ‘A Structural Theory of Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 591–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Barry: 1994, Case, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Michael: 1993, ‘Theta Theory and Arguments’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, Luigi: 1986, Italian Syntax, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe, Hyon-Sook: 1994, ‘ECM as Raising’, unpublished manuscript, Yeungnam University, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986a, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins, and Uses, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986b, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1989, ‘Some Notes on the Economy of Derivations and Representations’, in I. Laka and A. Mahajan (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, pp 43–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1992, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1994, ‘Bare Phrase Structure’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik: 1991, ‘Principles and Parameters Theory’, to appear in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra: 1978, Case-marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo: 1990, Types of A'-Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon: 1981, ‘Subjecthood and Islandhood: Evidence from Quechua’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 1–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter: 1982, Imbabura Quechua, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowper, Elizabeth: 1988, ‘What's a Subject? Non-nominative Subjects in Icelandic’, Proceedings of NELS 18, GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowper, Elizabeth: 1992, A Concise Introduction to Syntactic Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darzi, Ali: 1993, ‘Raising in Persian’, Proceedings of ESCOL '93, Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 81–92.

  • Darzi, Ali: forthcoming, Move Alpha in Persian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

  • Déchaine, Rose-Marie and Victor Manfredi: 1994, ‘Binding Domains in Haitian’, NLLT 12, 203–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Déprez, Viviane: 1992, ‘Raising Constructions in Haitian Creole’, NLLT 10, 191–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung, and Lisa Travis: 1992, ‘Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages’, NLLT 10, 375–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdts, Donna and Cheong Youn: 1989, ‘Psych Constructions and Case in Korean’, unpublished manuscript, SUNY Buffalo.

  • Harbert, Wayne: 1989: ‘Case Attraction and Hierarchization of Case’, Proceedings of ESCOL '89, pp. 138–149.

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1983, Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1984, Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, Katalin É: to appear, ‘NP-movement, Operator Movement, and Scrambling in Hungarian’, in K. Kiss (ed.), Discourse and Configurationality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Kuno, Susumu: 1973, The Structure of the Japanese Language, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, Sige-Yuki: 1987, ‘Movement of Noun Phrases in Japanese’, in T. Imai and M. Saito (eds.), Issues in Japanese Linguistics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 229–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard: 1988, ‘On the Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard: 1992, ‘Case and Expletives: Notes toward a Parametric Account’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 381–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard: 1993, ‘Lectures on Minimalist Syntax’, University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics 1, distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, MIT.

  • Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito: 1992, Move Alpha, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jeong-Shik: 1992, Case Alternations in Korean: Case Minimality, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Lefebvre, Claire and Pieter Muysken: 1982, ‘Raising as Move Case’, The Linguistic Review 2, 161–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, Claire and Pieter Muvsken: 1988, Mixed Categories: Nominalizations in Quechua, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, Joan: 1989, ‘Adverbials and Structural Case in Korean’, in S. Kuno et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 3, Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, pp. 297–308.

  • Massam Diane: 1985, Case Theory and the Projection Principle, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, MIT.

  • McCloskey, James and Peter Sells: 1988, ‘Control and A-Chains in Modern Irish’, NLLT 6, 143–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, John: 1993, ‘Locality Conditions on A-Chains: Evidence from Copy-Raising’, paper presented at the LSA meeting, Los Angeles.

  • Mulder, Jean: 1976, ‘Raising in Turkish’, Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistic Society 2, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muysken, Pieter: 1989, ‘Predication Chains: Case and Argument Status in Quechua and Turkish’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 627–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David and Paul Postal: 1983, ‘Some Proposed Laws of Basic Clause Structure’, in D. Perlmutter (ed.), Studies in Relational Grammar 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 81–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, Eduardo: 1987, ‘Case Theory and Infl-to-Comp: The Inflected Infinitive in European Portuguese’, Linguistic Inquiry 18, 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, Eduardo and Juan Uriagereka: 1990, ‘Long-Distance Case Assignment’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 505–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1990, Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiter, William: 1980, Studies on Niuean Syntax, Garland Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann: 1991, ‘Icelandic Case-marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments’, NLLT 9, 327–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott and David Perlmutter: 1979, Syntactic Argumentation and the Structure of English, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, David: 1989, A Grammar of Huallaga Quechua, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, John: 1989, ‘String Vacuous V-to-Comp’, unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.

  • Williams, Edwin: 1993, Thematic Structure in Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, In-Seok: 1972, Korean Syntax: Case Marking, Delimiters, Complementation and Relativization, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Hawaii.

  • Yoon, James Hye-Suk: 1989, A Restrictive Theory of Morphosyntactic Interaction and Its Consequences, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, James Hye-Suk: 1992, ‘A-Chain Locality: Some Crosslinguistic Variations’, in L. Stvan et al. (eds.), Proceedings of FLSM 3, Indiana University Linguistics aub, Bloomington, pp. 356–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, James Hye-Suk: 1994, ‘Korean Verbal Inflection and Checking Theory’, The Morphology-Syntax Connection: Papers from the January 1994 MIT Workshop, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22, Department of Linguistics, MIT, pp. 251–70.

  • Yoon, James Hye-Suk and Jeongme Yoon: 1990, ‘Chain Condition, Ambiguity of Government, and Derivational Grammars’, Proceedings of NELS 21, GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 415–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Jeongme: 1991, The Syntax of A-Chains, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Yu-Cho, Young-Mee and Peter Sells: to appear, ‘A Lexical Account of Phrasal Suffixes in Korean’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics.

  • Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling and Hoskuldur Thráinsson: 1985, ‘Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive’, NLLT 3, 441–483.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported in this paper was presented in various stages at NELS 21 (Montreal), the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), and the University of Texas (Austin). This research was initiated jointly with Jeongme Yoon, to whom I owe a special debt of gratitude. Initial stages of this work are reported in her dissertation as well as in our joint and individual papers. I would also like to thank the following individuals for their help and comments at various stages of this work: Elabbas Benmamoun, Rakesh Bhatt, Michel DeGraff, Kisun Hong, Jeongshik Lee, Youngsuk Lee, and Joan Maling. The comments of several anonymous reviewers of NLLT, as well as the prodding and encouragement of Joan Maling, helped to significantly improve the content and organization of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, J. Ambiguity of government and the Chain Condition. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 14, 105–162 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133404

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133404

Keywords

Navigation