Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of effective mass for continuous contact models in multibody dynamics

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuous contact models have been popular in representing contact forces between impacting bodies of a multibody system. These models consider the contact force to be the result of a logical spring-damper element between the contacting bodies that exists for a very short period. The simplified and approximated model for generating the contact force is then assumed to be a mass-spring-damper system. Therefore, three common parameters that these models require are the spring stiffness, damping coefficient, and the so-called effective mass. For systems containing one degree-of-freedom, classical methods based on the kinetic energy have commonly been used to determine the effective mass. However, for multiple-degree-of-freedom multibody systems that contain kinematic joints, the determination of the effective mass has not been adequately addressed in the literature. This paper proposes a simple method for computing the effective mass based on the concept of impulse–momentum balance. This approach is applicable to both constrained and unconstrained equations of motion regardless of the multibody system’s number of degrees-of-freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Corral, E., Moreno, R.G., García, M.J.G., Castejón, C.: Nonlinear phenomena of contact in multibody systems dynamics: a review. Nonlinear Dyn. 104(2), 1269–1295 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mukherjee, R.M., Anderson, K.S.: Efficient methodology for multibody simulations with discontinuous changes in system definition. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 18(2), 145–168 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikravesh, P.E.: Planar Multibody Dynamics: Formulation, Programming with MATLAB, and Applications, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Carvalho, A.S., Martins, J.M.: Exact restitution and generalizations for the Hunt-Crossley contact model. Mech. Mach. Theory 139, 174–194 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Machado, M., Moreira, P., Flores, P., Lankarani, H.M.: Compliant contact force models in multibody dynamics: evolution of the Hertz contact theory. Mech. Mach. Theory 53, 99–121 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, G., Liu, C., Liu, Y.: Energy dissipation analysis for elastoplastic contact and dynamic dashpot models. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 221, 107214 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobs, D.A., Waldron, K.J.: Modeling inelastic collisions with the Hunt-Crossley model using the energetic coefficient of restitution. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 10(2), 021001 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodrigues da Silva, M., Marques, F., Tavares da Silva, M., Flores, P.: A compendium of contact force models inspired by Hunt and Crossley’s cornerstone work. Mech. Mach. Theory 167, 104501 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anagnostopoulos, S.A.: Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 16(3), 443–456 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Flores, P., Machado, M., Silva, M.T., Martins, J.M.: On the continuous contact force models for soft materials in multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 25(3), 357–375 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-010-9237-4

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, S., Guo, X.: A dissipative contact force model for impact analysis in multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 35(2), 131–151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-015-9453-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunt, K., Crossley, F.R.E.: Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. J. Appl. Mech. 42(2), 440–445 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khulief, Y.A., Shabana, A.A.: Dynamic analysis of constrained systems of rigid and flexible bodies with intermittent motion. J. Mech. Transm. Autom. Des. 108, 38–45 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lankarani, H.M., Nikravesh, P.E.: Hertz contact force model with permanent indentation in impact analysis of solids. In: 18th Annual ASME Design Automation Conference (1992). Publ. by ASME

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hertz, H.: Gesammelte Werke, vol. 1. Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig (1895)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lankarani, H.M.: Canonical equations of motion and estimation of parameters in the analysis of impact problems. Ph.D. thesis, the University of Arizona (1988)

  17. Wang, W., Hua, X., Wang, X., Chen, Z., Song, G.: Advanced impact force model for low-speed pounding between viscoelastic materials and steel. Eng. Mech. (ASCE) 143(12), 04017139 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lankarani, H.M., Nikravesh, P.E.: Continuous contact force models for impact analysis in multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 5(2), 193–207 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye, K., Li, L., Zhu, H.: A note on the Hertz contact model with nonlinear damping for pounding simulation. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38(9), 1135–1142 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poursina, M., Nikravesh, P.: Characterization of the damping coefficient in the continuous contact model. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 15, 091005 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Poursina, M., Nikravesh, P.: Optimal damping coefficient for a class of continuous contact models. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 50(2), 169–188 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-020-09745-x

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao, S.S.: Mechanical Vibrations, 5th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lankarani, H.M., Ma, D., Menon, R.: Impact dynamics of multibody mechanical systems and application to crash responses of aircraft occupant/structure. In: Pereira, M.F.O.S., Ambrosio, J.A.C. (eds.) Computational Dynamics in Multibody Systems, pp. 239–265. Springer, Dordrecht (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Lankarani, H.M., Nikravesh, P.E.: A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems. ASME J. Mech. Des. 112(3), 369–376 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parviz E. Nikravesh.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikravesh, P.E., Poursina, M. Determination of effective mass for continuous contact models in multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn 58, 253–273 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-022-09859-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-022-09859-4

Keywords

Navigation