Abstract
We prove that Weyl quantization preserves constant of motion of the Harmonic Oscillator. We also prove that if f is a classical constant of motion and \(\mathfrak {Op}(f)\) is the corresponding operator, then \(\mathfrak {Op}(f)\) maps the Schwartz class into itself and it defines an essentially self-adjoint operator on \(L^{2}(\mathbb {R}^{n})\). As a consequence, we obtain detailed spectral information of \(\mathfrak {Op}(f)\). A complete characterization of the classical constants of motion of the Harmonic Oscillator is given and we also show that they form an algebra with the integral Moyal star product. We give some interesting examples of constants of motion and we analyze Weinstein-Guillemin average method within our framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, R., Marsden, E.: Foundations of Mechanics, 2nd edn. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co, Redwood (1978)
Ali, S. T., Engliš, M.: Quantization methods: a guide for physicists and analysts. Rev. Math. Phys. 17(4), 391–490 (2005)
Belmonte, F.: Canonical quantization of constants of motion. Rev. Math. Phys. 32(2050030) (2020)
Birman, M., Solomyak, M.: Spectral Theory of Selfadjoint Operators in Hilbert Spaces. Translated from the 1980 Rusian Original by S. Khrushchëv and V. Peller. Mathematics and Its Applications (Soviet Series). Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht (1987)
Dixmier, J.: Von Neumann Algebras. Translated by F. Jellett from Les algèbres d’operators dans l’espace hilbertien(algèbres de Von Neumann, vol. 27. North-Holland mathematical library (1969)
Doll, M., Zelditch, S.: Schrödinger trace invariants for homogeneous perturbations of the harmonic oscillator. J. Spectr. Theory to appear (2018)
Agorram, F., Benkhadra, A., El Hamyani, A., Ghanmi, A.: Complex hermite functions as Fourier Wigner transform. Integral Transforms and Special Functions 27(2) (2016)
Bayen, F., Flato, M., Fronsdal, C., Lichnerowicz, A., Sternheimer, D.: Deformation theory and quantization. I. Deformations of symplectic structures. Ann. Phys. 111(1), 61–110 (1978)
Federer, H.: Curvature measures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93, 418–491 (1959)
Federer, H.: Geometric Measure Theory Die Grundlehren Der Mathematischen Wissenschaften Band, vol. 153. Springer, Berlin (1969)
Folland, G. B.: Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 122. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1989)
Groenewold, H.: On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics. Physica 12, 405–460 (1946)
Guillemin, V.: Band asymptotics in two dimensions. Adv. Math 42(3), 248–282 (1981)
Hörmander, L.: Seudo-differential operators and hypoelliptic equations. Singular integrals (proc. Sympos. Pure math. Vol. X, Chicago, Ill., 1966), pp. 138–183 (1967)
Igusa, J.: Theta functions. Springer (1972)
Kontsévich, M.: Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. Let. Math. Phys. 66(3), 157–216 (2003)
Berger, M., Gauduchon, P., Mazet, E.: Le Spectre D’une Variété Riemanniene. Notes in Math, vol. 194. Springer, Berlin (1971)
Doll, M., Gannot, O., Wunsch, J.: Refined Weyl law for homogeneous perturbations of the harmonic oscillator. Comm. Math. Phys. 362(1), 269–294 (2018)
Marsden, J.: Lectures on Mechanics, LMS Lecture Notes, vol. 174. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Marsden, J., Weinstein, A.: Reduction of symplectic manifolds with symmetry. Rep. Math. Phys. 5, 121–130 (1974)
Maurin, K.: General Eigenfunction Expansions and Unitary Representations of Topological Groups. Monografie Matematyczne, vol. 48. PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw (1968)
Meyer, K.: Symmetries and integrals in mechanics. Dynamical Systems M. Peixoto, Academic Press, 259–273 (1973)
Estrada, R., Gracia-Bondía, J.M., Várilly, J.: On asymptotic expansions of twisted products. J. Math. Phys. 30(12), 2789–2796 (1989)
Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, vol. I. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego (1980)
Shubin, M. A.: Pseudodifferential Operators and Spectral Theory Translated by S. I. Andersson,. Springer Series in Soviet Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (1987)
Simon, L.: Lectures on Geometric Measure Theory, Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematical Analysis, vol. 3. Australian National University (1983)
Taylor, M. E.: Pseudodifferential Operator Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 34. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J (1981)
Weinstein, A.: Asymptotics of eigenvalue clusters for the Laplacian plus a potential. Duke Math. J. 44(4), 883–892 (1977)
Weyl, H.: Quantenmechanik und Gruppentheorie. Z. Physik 46, 1–46 (1927)
Zworski, M.: Semiclassical Analysis Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 138. AMS, Providence, RI (2012)
Acknowledgments
Sebastián Cuéllar was supported by CONICYT (Beca Doctorado Nacional Convocatoria 2017 Folio 21171197)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A: Weyl Quantization
Appendix A: Weyl Quantization
In this appendix we recall the definition of Weyl quantization and some of its main features.
Weyl quantization [12, 29] (or Weyl calculus) is a map meant to transform functions in the canonical phase space ℝsp 2n (classical observables) into operators on Lsp 2(ℝsp n) (quantum observables) in a physically meaningful manner, that is, taking into account the analogies between the descriptions of classical and quantum mechanics. There are several approaches to introduce Weyl quantization, for instance [25, 27, 30], but for the purposes of this articles we will mainly follow [11]. We also recommend [2] for a quite complete review of quantization theory.
Formally, for certain function f on phase space, we define the operator 𝔒𝔭ℏ(f) acting on Lsp 2(ℝsp n) given by
where ℏ is a positive parameter interpreted as Planck’s constant. In this article, we will not need to consider the roll played by ℏ, so we will take ℏ = 1 and 𝔒𝔭 := 𝔒𝔭1.
The meaning of the expression (19) changes depending on the class of functions we are considering. More precisely, if \(f\in S^{\prime }(\mathbb{R} ^{2n})\), then \(\mathfrak{O}\mathfrak{p} (f):S(\mathbb{R}^{n})\to S^{\prime }(\mathbb{R}^{n})\), so (19) defines a tempered distribution (in particular, the evaluation on x is not well-defined). The standard way to rigorously define 𝔒𝔭(f) is the following: Notice that, the kernel of 𝔒𝔭(f) should be
where \((I\otimes \mathcal F)\) is the Fourier transform in the momentum variable. The change of variables \((x,y)\to \left (\frac {x+y}{2},y-x\right)\) is linear, injective and preserves measure. Thus composing with the latter change of variable maps S(ℝsp 2n) into itself continuously, and it can be extended to \(S^{\prime }(\mathbb{R} ^{2n})\). Since the \((I\otimes \mathcal F)\) is well-defined on \(S^{\prime }(\mathbb{R} ^{2n})\), we can define Kf for \(f\in S^{\prime }(\mathbb{R} ^{2n})\) using the middle expression in (20). In fact, the map f → Kf is an automorphism of the locally convex space \(S^{\prime }(\mathbb{R} ^{2n})\). Finally, for u,v ∈ S(ℝsp n), we define
The Wigner transform is a fundamental object in the description of Weyl quantization. It is defined by the map W : S(ℝsp n) × S(ℝsp n) → S(ℝsp 2n) given by
The Wigner transform can be regarded as the restriction to functions of two variables of the form \(g(x,y)=u(x)\overline {v(y)}\) of the map \(\tilde W\) defined by
Using the arguments in the definition of the kernel Kf, we can define \(\tilde W\) on \(S^{\prime }(\mathbb{R} ^{2n})\). In fact, \(\tilde W\) is the inverse of the map f → Kf, and it is unitary on Lsp 2(ℝsp 2n). In particular, we have that
For instance, if f is polynomially bounded, then
One of the main properties of Weyl quantization is its relation to the so called metaplectic representation. Let Sp(2n) be the real symplectic group, i.e. the group formed by all the linear and symplectic maps S : ℝsp 2n → ℝsp 2n. There is a map \(\mu : Sp(2n)\to \mathcal U(L^{2}(\mathbb{R} ^{n}))\), characterized up to a ± 1 factor by the identity:
where \((q,p)\in \mathbb {H}_{n}\) is an element of Heisenberg group and ρ is the Schrödinger representation. The map μ is called the metaplectic representation (see [11] for details). As consequences, we have the very important (and beautiful) identities
The metaplectic representation is not a true representation of Sp(2n), because in general we only have that μ(ST) = ±μ(S)μ(T), so it defines a representation of the double covering group Sp2(n) of Sp(2n). However, restricted to the complex unitary group U(n), μ does define a representation (notice that the Hamiltonian flow of the Harmonic Oscillator belongs to U(n)).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belmonte, F., Cuéllar, S. Constants of Motion of the Harmonic Oscillator. Math Phys Anal Geom 23, 35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11040-020-09362-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11040-020-09362-2