Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative outcomes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study is described that tested a model (Feather in Eur Rev Soc Psychol 17:38–73, 2006) relating emotions to the appraisal of outcome deservingness for self or other person. Outcome deservingness was assumed to depend on the evaluative structure of action/outcome relations (Feather in Values, achievement, and justice: studies in the psychology of deservingness. Kluwer/Plenum Publishers, New York, 1999b). The study tested predictions about relations between this structure and the emotions of pleasure, admiration, pride, resentment, anger, sadness, sympathy, guilt, regret, disappointment, and surprise. The study used a hypothetical scenario involving an applicant for a position in an organization where the applicant could either be other or self. Results that focused on planned comparisons and the action by focus interactions supported the analysis for both the positive outcome and the negative outcome conditions and they were consistent with the hypothesis that the appraisal of outcome deservingness would mediate at least in part the type of emotion that was reported when a positive or negative outcome followed a positive or negative action. Results were discussed in relation to the social psychology of justice and the emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. A. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Hetherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2000). The subtlety of emotions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1962). Aggression: A social psychological analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndsen, M., van der Pligt, J., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Guilt and regret: The determining role of interpersonal and intrapersonal harm. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, N. L., Kelso, K. A., Jackson, M. A., & Smith, R. H. (1997). The roles of invidious comparisons and deservingness in sympathy and Schadenfreude. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 363–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1963). Mowrer’s revised two-factor theory and the motive-expectancy-value model. Psychological Review, 70, 500–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–73). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1996a). Reactions to penalties for an offence in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1996b). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 215–251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to offences committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999a). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999b). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 38–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2008a). Effects of observer’s own status on reactions to a high achiever’s failure: Deservingness, resentment, and schadenfreude. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2008b). Perceived legitimacy of a promotion decision in relation to deservingness, entitlement, and resentment in the context of affirmative action and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1230–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R. (2009). Differentiating emotions in relation to deserved or undeserved outcomes: A retrospective study of real-life events. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 955–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Nairn, K. (2005). Resentment, envy, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Effects of own and other’s deserved or undeserved status. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 953–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. H., Manstead, A. S. R., & Zaalberg, R. (2003). Social influences on the emotion process. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hareli, S., & Parkinson, B. (2008). What’s social about social emotions? Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 38, 131–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, P. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Procedural justice, outcome favorability, and emotion. Social Justice Research, 13, 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2006). Justice and desert-based emotions. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2008). “A vengefulness of the impotent”: the pain of in-group inferiority and schadenfreude toward successful out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1383–1396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1994). Injustice in harm and loss. Social Justice Research, 7, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, B., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2005). Emotion in social relations. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1993). Making sense of emotions in stories and social life. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 295–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portmann, J. (2000). When bad things happen to other people. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2001). Simulation, scenarios, and emotional appraisal: Testing the convergence of real and imagined reactions to emotional stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1520–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of behavior: A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol 5. Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 11–36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, I. J. (2001). A model of appraisal in the emotion system: Integrating theory, research, and applications. In K. R. Sherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 68–91). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, I. J., Antoniou, A. A., & Jose, P. E. (1996). Appraisal determinants of emotion: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 241–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD Triad Hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Eds.). (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, and research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P., Shwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. H. (2000). Assimilative and constrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. In L. Wheeler & J. Suls (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 173–200). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 46–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core related themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 295–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. H., Turner, T. J., Garonzik, R., Leach, C. W., Urch-Druskat, V., & Weston, C. M. (1996). Envy and Schadenfreude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., & Fischer, K. W. (Eds.). (1995). Self-conscious emotions: Shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). What’s moral about the self-conscious emotions? In J. L. Tracy, R. W. Robins, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 21–37). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.). (2007). The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, W., Ouwerkerk, J., Goslinga, S., & Nieweg, M. (2005). Deservingness and schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 933–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. T. Feather.

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feather, N.T., McKee, I.R. & Bekker, N. Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative outcomes. Motiv Emot 35, 1–13 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9202-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9202-4

Keywords

Navigation