Skip to main content
Log in

Injustice in harm and loss

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The major topics of this overview article are as follow: (i) A distinction is made between justice and deservedness. Suffered harm and loss may be judged undeserved with respect to the victim's prior behavior, prior life, and personality without the implication that a victimizer is identified who acted unjustly. (ii) The perception of injustice is outlined as a subjective construction that has two major components: The subject selects and applies one of several rules or principles of justice applicable to the case and the subject is attributing responsibility to an agent or agency who is not the victim himself or herself. It is argued that in every case there are several options for the selection of a rule of justice and for the attribution of responsibility. (iii) Several so-called risk factors of critical life events as unforeseeability, uncontrollability of events, and nonnormativeness of events are reinterpreted as factors relevant in the subjective construction of injustice. (iv) Several coping strategies reported in the literature on critical life events such as palliative comparisons, self-blame, or search for meaning are interpreted as efforts to avoid feelings of injustice. (v) On the basis of empirical data a closer look is taken on self-blame which, psychologically, is a heterogeneous construct. The effects of self-blame depend on its function: When used strategically as a means to avoid feelings of uncontrollability of one's fate or to reduce feelings of hostility toward a victimizer, it may have adaptive functions. When imposed by the subjective view of the facts it may result in feelings of guilt, shame, or anger about an avoidable mistake, feelings that are not adaptive but rather add to the negative balance caused by the primary loss or harm. (vi) Concerning search for meaning, a distinction is proposed between (a) grasping the meaning in the sense of understanding motives, goals, and reasons of the victimizer and (b) discovering and construing some gains in the consequences of a victimization, gains which may be material, social, experiential, self- and personality-related, or developmental. While finding meaning of the second kind improves the loss-gain balance and tends to reduce the perceived injustice the first kind of grasping meaning may sometimes result in intensifying feelings of injustice, especially when motives, goals, and reasons of the victimizer are considered as selfish, malevolent, or uncaring. The article ends with a discussion of the ambivalence of a victim's status which establishes some entitlements for compensation and care but also bears the risk of secondary victimization by negative social reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albs, B., and Montada, L. (1991). “Self-blame” and adjustment to spinal cord injuries. In Johnston, M., Herbert, M., and Marteon, T., (eds.),Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, Bocards Press, London, pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett-Herbert, T., and Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1992). Negative social reactions to victims: An overview of responses and their determinants. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.),Life Crises and Experiences of Loss in Adulthood, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 487–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H. W. (1991). Attributions of responsibility and helpfulness. In L. Montada, & H. W. Bierhoff (eds.),Altruism in Social Systems, Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Lewiston, NY, pp. 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, M. L., and Miller, D. T. (1994). Reactions to incongruous negative life events.Soc. Justice Res. 7: 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulman, R. J., and Wortman, C. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35: 351–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. H. (1988).Life Events and Psychological Functioning: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C., Montada, L., and Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen.Psychol. Beitr. 29: 596–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1992).Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens, Russel Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipp, S.-H., and Gräser, H. (1982). Psychologische Prävention im Umfeld kritischer Lebensereignisse. In Brandtstädter, J., and von Eye, A., (eds.),Psychologische Prävention, Huber, Bern, pp. 155–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipp, S.-H. (1992). Could it be worse? The diagnosis of cancer as a prototype of traumatic life events. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.),Life Crises and Experiences of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 23–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E. (1979).Ärztliche Seelsorge. Grundlagen der Logotherapie und Existenzanalyse, Deuticke, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. (1992). Psychological factors influencing the recuperation process of accident patients. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H. and Lerner, M. J. (eds.),Life Crises and Experiences of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NY, pp. 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963).Stigma, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotay, C. C. (1985). Why me? Attributions and adjustment by cancer patients and their mates at two stages in the disease process.Soc. Sci. Med. 20: 825–831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological vs. behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1798–1809.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janoff-Bulman, R., and Frieze, I. H. (1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding responses to victimization.J. Soc. Issues 39(2): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoff-Bulman, R., and Morgan, H. J. (1994). Victims' responses to traumatic life events: An unjust world or uncaring world?Soc. Justice Res. 7: 47–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., and Nisbett, R. E. (1971).The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior, General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution.Am. Psychol. 28: 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, G. (1981).IPC-Fragebogen zu Kontrollüberzeugungen, Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepenies, W. (1988).Autoren und Wissenschaftler im 18. Jahrhundert, Hauser, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms.J. Pers. 45: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (1967).Death in Life: Survivors of Hiroshima, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linné, C. von. (1981)Nemesis Divina.Herausgegeben von Wolf Lepenies undLars Gustafson, Hauser, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J. (1994). Blaming the victim.Soc. Justice Res. 7: 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J., and Montada, L. (1988). Verantwortlichkeit für “Schicksalsschläge”: Eine Pilotstudie.Psychol. Beitr. 31: 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, P. (1991).Sinnsuche und Sinnfindung im Umfeld eines kritischen Lebensereignisses: Die Krebserkrankung als prototypische Sinnkrise. Dissertation, Universität Trier.

  • Meyer, C. B., and Taylor, S. E. (1986). Adjustment to rape.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 1226–1234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., and Porter, C. (1983). Self-blame in victims of violence.J. Soc. Issues 39: 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., and Turnbull, W. (1992). The counterfactual fallacy: Confusing what might have been with what ought to have been. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.),Life Crises and Experiences of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1991). Coping with life stress: Injustice and the question “Who is responsible?” In Steensma, H., and Vermunt, R. (eds.),Social Justice in Human Relations, Vol. 2, Plenum Press, New York, 9–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1992a). Attribution of responsibility for losses and perceived injustice. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.),Life Crises and Experiences of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 133–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1992b). Victimization by critical life events. In Bilsky, W., Pfeiffer, C., and Wetzels, P. (eds.),Fear of Crime and Criminal Victimization, Enke, Stuttgart. 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, A., and Fisher, J. D. (1986). The role of threat to self-esteem and perceived control in recipient reaction to help: Theory development and empirical validation. In Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 81–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J., Montada, L., and Schmitt, M. (1992). Sensibilität für erlebte Ungerechtigkeit als Eigenschaft. In Montada, L. (ed.),Bericht über den 38. Kongreβ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Bd. 1, Hogrefe, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perloff, L. S. (1983). Perceptions of vulnerability to victimization.J. Soc. Issues 39: 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, S. (1978).Aggressive Behavior and the Rosenzweig Picture Frustration Test, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychol. Monogr. 8 (Whole No. 609).

  • Rubin, Z., and Peplau, A. (1973). Belief in a just world on reactions to another's lot. A study of participants in the national draft lottery.J. Soc. Issues 29(4): 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, W. (1971).Blaming the Victim. Pantheon, New York.

  • Semin, G. R., and Manstead, A. S. R. (1983).The Accountability of Conduct. A Social Psychological Analysis, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 14: 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G. (1985).The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility, and Blameworthiness, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, R. L., and Wortman, C. B. (1980). Coping with undesirable life events. In Garber, J. and Seligman, M. E. P. (eds.),Human Helplessness, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, R. L., Boon, C., and Stones, M. H. (1983). Search for meaning in misfortune: Making sense of incest.J. Soc. Issues 39: 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1988).State-Frust-Anger Expression-Inventory.Research Edition, P. A. R., Odessa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.Am. Psychol. 38: 1161–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (1989).Positive Illusions. Creative Self-Deceptions and the Healthy Mind, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. W., and Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: Some social psychological contributions to a theory of mental health.Psychol. Bull. 103: 193–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., and Reed, G. M. (1992). Social comparison and affiliation under threat. In Montada, L., Philipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.),Life Crises and Experiences of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1983). Dimensions of life events that influence psychological distress: An evaluation and synthesis of the literature. In Kaplan, H. B. (ed.),Psychological Stress. Trends in Theory and Research, Academic Press, New York, pp. 33–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A. (1992). The role of similarity in coping through downward comparison. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.),Life Crises and Experiences of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 196–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C. B. (1976). Causal attributions and personal control. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., and Kidd, R. F. (eds.),New Directions in Attribution Research, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 21–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C. B. (1983). Coping with victimization: Conclusions and implications for future research.J. Soc. Issues 39: 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C. B., and Silver, R. C. (1992). Reconsidering assumptions about coping with loss: An overview of current research. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.),Life Crises and Experiences of Losses in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 341–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montada, L. Injustice in harm and loss. Soc Just Res 7, 5–28 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333820

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333820

Key Words

Navigation