Adams WM et al (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306(5699):1146–1149
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Article
Google Scholar
Antrop M (2000) Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 77(1–2):17–28
Article
Google Scholar
Antrop M (2006) Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landsc Urban Plan 75(3–4):187–197
Article
Google Scholar
Arroyo-Rodriguez V et al (2020) Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13535
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Arts B et al (2017) Landscape approaches: a state-of-the-art review. Annu Rev Environ Resour 42:439
Google Scholar
Balint PJ, Stewart RE, Desai A (2011) Wicked environmental problems: managing uncertainty and conflict. Island Press, Washington, DC
Book
Google Scholar
Ban NC et al (2018) Incorporate indigenous perspectives for impactful research and effective management. Nat Ecol Evol 2(11):1680
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Barlow J et al (2011) Using learning networks to understand complex systems: a case study of biological, geophysical and social research in the Amazon. Biol Rev 86(2):457–474
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Barlow J et al (2018) The future of tropical hyperdiverse ecosystems. Nature 559:517
CAS
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bennett NJ (2016) Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 30(3):582–592
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Biggs D et al (2011) The implementation crisis in conservation planning: Could “mental models” help? Conserv Lett 4(3):169–183
Article
Google Scholar
Boedhihartono AK et al (2018) Conservation science and practice must engage with the realities of complex tropical landscapes. Trop Conserv Sci 11:194008291877957
Article
Google Scholar
Bourgeron P, Humphries HC, Jensen ME (2001) Ecosystem characterization and ecological assessments. In: Jensen ME, Bourgeron PS (eds) A guidebook for integrated ecological assessments. Springer, New York, NY, pp 40–54
Chapter
Google Scholar
Bousquet F et al (2002) Multi-agent systems and role games: an approach for ecosystem co-management. In: Janssen M (ed) Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent approaches. Elgar Publishers, Northampton, pp 248–285
Google Scholar
Brown K (2003) Integrating conservation and development: a case of institutional misfit. Front Ecol Environ 1(9):479–487
Article
Google Scholar
Brown K (2004) Trade-off analysis for integrated conservation and development. In: McShane TO, Wells MP (eds) Getting biodiversity projects to work. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 232–255
Chapter
Google Scholar
Bürgi M et al (2017) Integrated landscape approach: closing the gap between theory and application. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081371
Article
Google Scholar
Büscher B, Fletcher R (2019) Towards convivial conservation. Conserv Soc 17(3):283–296
Article
Google Scholar
Carmenta R et al (2020) Characterizing and evaluating integrated landscape initiatives. One Earth 2(2):174–187
Article
Google Scholar
Cash DW et al (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development ¨. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8086–8091
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Article
Google Scholar
Cash DW et al (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8
Article
Google Scholar
Castaneda F, Palmberg-Lerche C, Vuorinen P (2001) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: a compendium. Forest Management Working Paper (FAO)
Charnley S et al (2017) Evaluating the best available social science for natural resource management decision-making. Environ Sci Policy 73(April):80–88
Article
Google Scholar
Chazdon RL et al (2020) Co-creating conceptual and working frameworks for implementing forest and landscape restoration based on core principles. Forests 11(6):1–24
Google Scholar
Chervier C, Piketty MG, Reed J (2020) Theories of change and monitoring and evaluation types for landscape approaches. In: Reed J, Ros-Tonen MAF, Sunderland T (eds) Operationalizing integrated landscape approaches in the tropics. CIFOR, Bogor, p 78
Google Scholar
Christensen J (2004) Win-win illusions. Conserv Pract 5(1):12–19
Article
Google Scholar
Clay N (2016) Geoforum producing hybrid forests in the congo basin: a political ecology of the landscape approach to conservation. Geoforum 76:130–141
Article
Google Scholar
Collier N et al (2011) Science for action: the use of scoping models in conservation and development. Environ Sci Policy 14(6):628–638
Article
Google Scholar
Cordingley JE et al (2016) Can landscape-scale approaches to conservation management resolve biodiversity-ecosystem service trade-offs? J Appl Ecol 53(1):96–105
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Cunningham RB, Lindenmayer DB (2017) Approaches to landscape scale inference and study design. Curr Landsc Ecol Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-016-0019-4
Article
Google Scholar
Daw TM et al (2015) Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(2):6949–6954
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Article
Google Scholar
DeFries R, Rosenzweig C (2010) Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(46):19627–19632
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Article
Google Scholar
Djenontin INS, Meadow AM (2018) The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice. Environ Manage 61(6):885–903
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Doak DF et al (2013) What is the future of conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 29:77
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dornelas M, Magurran AE (2018) BioTIME: a database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene. Global Ecol Biogeogr 27(November 2017):760–786
Article
Google Scholar
Erbaugh JT, Agrawal A (2017) Clarifying the landscape approach: a letter to the Editor on “Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics.” Global Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12426
Article
Google Scholar
ESPA (2018) Wellbeing:for whom and how? ESPA, Farnham
Google Scholar
Esquivel-Muelbert A et al (2019) Compositional response of Amazon forests to climate change. Global Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14413
Article
Google Scholar
Evans K et al (2021) Getting it right: a guide to improve inclusion in multi-stakeholder forums. CIFOR, Bogor
Google Scholar
Evans K, Guariguata MR, Brancalion PHS (2018) Participatory monitoring to connect local and global priorities for forest restoration. Conserv Biol 32(3):525–534
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ferreira J et al (2018) Carbon-focused conservation may fail to protect the most biodiverse tropical forests. Nat Clim Change 8(8):744–749
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 4(2):80–86
Article
Google Scholar
Fischer J et al (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6(7):380–385
Article
Google Scholar
Foley JA et al (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478(7369):337–342
CAS
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Fonseca MG et al (2019) Effects of climate and land-use change scenarios on fire probability during the 21st century in the Brazilian Amazon. Global Change Biol 25(9):2931–2946
Article
Google Scholar
França F et al (2016) Do space-for-time assessments underestimate the impacts of logging on tropical biodiversity? An Amazonian case study using dung beetles. J Appl Ecol 53(4):1098–1105
Article
Google Scholar
França FM et al (2020) Climatic and local stressor interactions threaten tropical forests and coral reefs. Philos Trans R Soc B 375:20190116
Article
Google Scholar
Freeman OE, Duguma LA, Minang PA (2015) Operationalizing the integrated landscape approach in practice. Ecol Soc 20(1):24ff
Article
Google Scholar
Gardner T et al (2008) The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecol Lett 11:139–150
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gergel S et al (2020) Conceptual links between landscape diversity and diet diversity: a roadmap for transdisciplinary research. Bioscience 70(7):563–575
PubMed
PubMed Central
Article
Google Scholar
Godfray HCJ et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science (new York, n. y.) 327(5967):812–818
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Gomes L, Miranda HS, da Cunha Bustamante MM (2018) How can we advance the knowledge on the behavior and effects of fire in the Cerrado biome? For Ecol Manage 417:281–290
Article
Google Scholar
Guariguata MR, Evans K (2019) ‘A diagnostic for collaborative monitoring in forest landscape restoration. Restor Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13076
Article
Google Scholar
Gurney GG et al (2019) Implementing a social-ecological systems framework for conservation monitoring: lessons from a multi-country coral reef program. Biol Conserv 240(August):108298
Article
Google Scholar
Gutzwiller K (2002) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York
Book
Google Scholar
Hart AK et al (2015) Integrated landscape initiatives in practice: assessing experiences from 191 landscapes in Africa nad Latin America. In: Minang PA et al (eds) Climate-smart landscapes: multifunctionality in practice. World Agroforestry CEntre, Nairobi, pp 89–102
Google Scholar
Hicks CC et al (2016) Engage key social concepts for sustainability. Science 352(6281):38–40
CAS
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
IPBES (2019) Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany
Google Scholar
Jenerette GD, Shen W (2012) Experimental landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 27(9):1237–1248
Article
Google Scholar
Kimmerer RW (2013) Braiding sweetgrass: indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions, Minneapolis
Google Scholar
Kozar R et al (2014) Toward viable landscape governance systems: what works? EcoAgriculture Partners, on behalf of the Landscapes for People, Food, and Nature Initiative, Washington, DC
Google Scholar
Kremen C, Merenlender AM (2018) Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6020
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kusters K et al (2018) Participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation of multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives. Environ Manage 62(1):170–181
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Kusters K et al (2020) Inclusive landscape governance for sustainable development: assessment methodology and lessons for Civil Society Organizations. Land 9(4):128
Article
Google Scholar
Lang DJ et al (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43
Article
Google Scholar
Langemeyer J et al (2018) Participatory multi-criteria decision aid: operationalizing an integrated assessment of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 30:49–60
Article
Google Scholar
Larson A et al (in review) Hot topics in governance for forests and trees: towards a (just) transformative research agenda. Forest Policy and Economics
Laumonier Y, Bourgeois R, Pfund J (2008) Accounting for the ecological dimension in participatory research and development: lessons learned from Indonesia and Madagascar. Ecol Soc 13(1):15
Article
Google Scholar
Laurance WF et al (2011) The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation. Biol Conserv 144(1):56–67
Article
Google Scholar
Leal CG et al (2020) Integrated terrestrial-freshwater planning doubles conservation of tropical aquatic species. Science 121(October):117–121
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lebel L (2013) Local knowledge and adaptation to climate change in natural resource-based societies of the Asia-Pacific. Mitig Adapt Strateg Global Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9407-1
Article
Google Scholar
Lindenmayer D et al (2008) A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecol Lett 11(1):78–91
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lockwood M et al (2010) Governance Principles for Natural Resource Management Governance Principles for Natural Resource Management. Soc Nat Resour 1920:986–1001
Article
Google Scholar
Loschiavo AJ et al (2013) Lessons learned from the first decade of adaptive management in comprehensive everglades restoration. Ecol Soc 18(4):11
Article
Google Scholar
Mace G (2014) Whose conservation? Science 345(6204):1558
CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Mansourian S (2017) Governance and forest landscape restoration: a framework to support decision-making. J Nat Conserv 37:21–30
Article
Google Scholar
Mansourian S (2018) In the eye of the beholder: reconciling interpretations of forest landscape restoration. Land Degrad Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3014
Article
Google Scholar
Mansourian S (2021) From landscape ecology to forest landscape restroration. Landsc Ecol 3:1–10
Google Scholar
Mansourian S, Parrotta JA (2018) Forest landscape restoration: integrated approaches to support effective implementation. Routledge, London
Book
Google Scholar
Mansourian S, Sgard A (2019) Diverse interpretations of governance and their relevance to forest landscape restoration. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.030
Article
Google Scholar
Mbow C, Neely C, Dobie P (2015) How can an integrated landscape approach contribute to the implimentation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and advance climate-smart objectives? In: Minang PA, van Noordwijk M (eds) Climate-smart landscapes: multifunctionality in practice. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, pp 103–116
Google Scholar
McCall MK (2016) Beyond “Landscape” in REDD+: the imperative for “territory.” World Dev 85:58–72
Article
Google Scholar
Mcneely JA (2006) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation—traditional practices, present dynamics, and lessons for the future. Biodivers Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-2087-3
Article
Google Scholar
McShane TO et al (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol Conserv 144(3):966–972
Article
Google Scholar
Meinig DW (1979) The beholding eye. Ten versions of the same scene. In: Meinig DW (ed) The interpretation of ordinary landscapes. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 33–48
Google Scholar
Milder JC et al (2012) Landscape approaches to achieving food production, natural resource conservation, and the millennium development goals. In: Ingram JC, DeClerck F (eds) Integrating ecology and poverty reduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–108
Chapter
Google Scholar
Montoya D et al (2020) ‘Reconciling biodiversity conservation, food production and farmers’ demand in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Model 416:108889
Article
Google Scholar
Muradian R et al (2013) Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conserv Lett 6(4):274–279
Article
Google Scholar
Norris K (2008) Agriculture and biodiversity conservation: opportunity knocks. Conserv Lett 1:2–11
Article
Google Scholar
Norström AV et al (2020) ‘Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nat Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
Article
Google Scholar
Noss RF (1983) A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. Bioscience 33(11):700–706
Article
Google Scholar
Oates J (1999) Myth and reality in the rainforest: how conservation strategies are failing in West Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley
Google Scholar
Ojha HR, Hall A, Sulaiman VR (2013) Adaptive collaborative approaches in natural resource governance: rethinking participation, learning and innovation. Routledge, London
Google Scholar
Padmanaba M, Sheil D (2013) Accessing local knowledge to identify where species of conservation concern occur in a tropical forest landscape. Environ Manage 52:348–359
PubMed
PubMed Central
Article
Google Scholar
Pascual U et al (2021) Biodiversity and the challenge of pluralism. Nat Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00694-7
Article
Google Scholar
Phillips O et al (Accepted) Taking the pulse of earth’s tropical forests using networks of highly distributed plots. Biol Conserv (In Press)
Qiu J et al (2018) Evidence-based causal chains for linking health, development, and conservation actions. Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix167
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rasmussen LV, Watkins C, Agrawal A (2017) Forest Policy and Economics Forest contributions to livelihoods in changing agriculture-forest landscapes. Forest Policy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.010
Article
Google Scholar
Reed J et al (2016) Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future. Global Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13284
Article
Google Scholar
Reed J, van Vianen J, Barlow J et al (2017a) Have integrated landscape approaches reconciled societal and environmental issues in the tropics? Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.021
Article
Google Scholar
Reed J, van Vianen J, Foli S et al (2017b) Trees for life: The ecosystem service contribution of trees to food production and livelihoods in the tropics. Forest Policy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.012
Article
Google Scholar
Reed J et al (2019) Engaging multiple stakeholders to reconcile climate, conservation and development objectives in tropical landscapes. Biol Conserv 238(March):108229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108229
Article
Google Scholar
Reed J et al (2020a) A methods toolbox for integrated landscape approaches. In: Reed J, Ros-Tonen MAF, Sunderland T (eds) Operationalizing integrated landscape approaches in the tropics. CIFOR, Bogor, p 89
Google Scholar
Reed J et al (2020b) Integrated landscape approaches in the tropics: a brief stock-take. Land Use Policy 99(April):104822
Article
Google Scholar
Rietbergen-McCracken J, Narayan-Parker D (1998) Participation and social assessment: tools and techniques. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC
Google Scholar
Ros-Tonen MAF, Reed J, Sunderland T (2018) From synergy to complexity: the trend toward integrated value chain and landscape governance. Environ Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1055-0
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Salwasser H (2002) Navigating through the wicked messiness of natural resource problems: roles for science, coping strategies, and decision analysis. In: Paper presented at the Sierra Science Summit, Kings Beach, CA
Sandbrook C (2015) What is conservation? Oryx 49(4):565–566
Article
Google Scholar
Sandbrook C et al (2013) Social research and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 27(6):1487–1490
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sandbrook C et al (2019) The global conservation movement is diverse but not divided. Nat Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0267-5
Article
Google Scholar
Sayer J (2009) Reconciling conservation and development: are landscapes the answer? Biotropica 41(6):649–652
Article
Google Scholar
Sayer J, Wells MP (2004) The pathology of projects. In: McShane TO, Wells MP (eds) Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards better conservation and development. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 35–48
Chapter
Google Scholar
Sayer JA, Campbell BM (2004) The science of sustainable development: local livelihoods and the global environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Google Scholar
Sayer J, Campbell EB, Petheram EL (2006) Assessing environment and development outcomes in conservation landscapes. Biodivers Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9079-9
Article
Google Scholar
Sayer J et al (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(21):8349–8356
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Article
Google Scholar
Sayer J et al (2015a) The role of citizen science in landscape and seascape approaches to integrating conservation and development. Land 4:1200–1212
Article
Google Scholar
Sayer J, Margules C, Boedhihartono AK, Dale A, Sunderland T, Supriatna J, Saryanthi R (2015) Landscape approaches; what are the preconditions for success? Sustainability Science 10(2):345–355
Article
Google Scholar
Sayer JA et al (2016) Measuring the effectiveness of landscape approaches to conservation and development. Sustain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0415-z
Article
Google Scholar
Scherr SJ, McNeely JA (2008) ‘Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of “ecoagriculture” landscapes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363(1491):477–494
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Scherr S, Shames S, Friedman R (2013) Defining integrated landscape management for policy makers. EcoAgric Policy Focus 10:1–6
Google Scholar
Sheil D, Lawrence A (2004) Tropical biologists, local people and conservation: new opportunities for collaboration. Trends Ecol Evol 19(12):634–638
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sheil D, Nasi R, Johnson B (2004) ‘Ecological Criteria and indicators for tropical forest landscapes: challenges in ecological criteria and indicators for tropical forest landscapes: challenges in the search for progress. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00638-090107
Article
Google Scholar
Shettima A, Tar U (2008) Farmer-pastoralist conflict in West Africa: exploring the causes and consequences. Inf Soc Justice J 1(2):163–184
Google Scholar
Solar R et al (2015) How pervasive is biotic homogenization in human-modified tropical forest landscapes? Ecol Lett 18:1108–1118
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Soulé M (2013) The “new conservation.” Conserv Biol 27(5):895–897
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Star SL, Griesemer J (1989) ‘Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420
Article
Google Scholar
Stouffer PC et al (2021) Long-term change in the avifauna of undisturbed Amazonian rainforest: ground-foraging birds disappear and the baseline shifts. Ecol Lett 24(2):186–195
PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sueur J, Farina A (2015) Ecoacoustics: the ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound. Biosemiotics 8:493–502
Article
Google Scholar
Sunderland T et al (2017) A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems. Forest Policy Econ 84(May):83–91
Article
Google Scholar
Sunderland TCH, Ehringhaus C, Campbell BM (2008) Conservation and development in tropical forest landscapes: a time to face the trade-offs? Environ Conserv 34(4):276–279
Google Scholar
Synes NW et al (2016) emerging opportunities for landscape ecological modelling. Curr Landsc Ecol Rep 1:146–167
Article
Google Scholar
Tress B et al (2001) Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landsc Urban Plan 57(3–4):137–141
Article
Google Scholar
Tscharntke T et al (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Cons 151(1):53–59
Article
Google Scholar
Vermunt DA, Verweij PA, Verburg RW (2020) What hampers implementation of integrated landscape approaches in rural landscapes? Curr Landsc Ecol Rep 5:99
Article
Google Scholar
Voinov A et al (2018) Environmental modelling & software tools and methods in participatory modeling: selecting the right tool for the job. Environ Model Softw 109(August):232–255
Article
Google Scholar
Wu JG (2013) Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landsc Ecol 28(1):1–11
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Zafra-calvo N et al (2020) Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: insights from the Global South. Global Environ Change 63(April):102115
Article
Google Scholar