Abstract
An approach to assessing the environmental outcomes and changes in peoples’ livelihoods resulting from landscape-scale conservation interventions was developed for three locations in Africa. Simple sets of performance indicators were developed through participatory processes that included a variety of stakeholders. The selection of indicators was designed to reflect wider landscape processes, conservation objectives and as local peoples’ preferred scenarios. This framework, combined with the use of social learning techniques, helped stakeholders develop greater understandings of landscape system dynamics and the linkages between livelihood and conservation objectives. Large scale conservation and development interventions should use these approaches to explore linkages and improve shared understanding of tradeoffs and synergies between livelihood and conservation initiatives. Such approaches provide the basis for negotiating and measuring the outcomes of conservation initiatives and for adapting these to changing perspectives and circumstances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CAR:
-
Central African Republic
- DFID:
-
Department for International Development
- DFSR:
-
Driving Force State Response Framework
- FESLM:
-
Framework for the Evaluation of Sustainable Land Management
- NGO:
-
Non Government Organisation
- PSR:
-
Pressure State Response
- TFCG:
-
Tanzania Forest Conservation Group
- UNDP:
-
United Nations Development Program
- WWF:
-
World Wide Fund for Nature
References
Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Devel 27:2021–2044
Bell S, Morse S (1999) Sustainability indicators–measuring the immeasurable. Earthscan, London
Bell S, Morse S (2001) Breaking through the Glass Ceiling: who really cares about sustainability indicators? Local Environ 6(3):291–309
Bell S, Morse S (2003) Measuring sustainability: learning by doing. Earthscan, London
Bossel H (2001) Assessing viability and sustainability: a systems-based approach for deriving comprehensive indicators sets. Cons Ecol 5(20):12
Campbell B, Sayer JA, Frost P et al (2001) Assessing the performance of natural resource systems. Conserv Ecol 5(2):22
Carney D (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: what contribution can we make? Department for International Development, London
Carney D, Drinkwater M, Rusinow T et al (1999) Livelihood approaches compared: a brief comparison of the livelihoods approaches of DFID, CARE, Oxfam, and UNDP. DFID, London
Carruthers G, Tinning G (2003) Where, and how, do monitoring and sustainability indicators fit into environmental management systems? Aust J Exp Agric 43:307–323
Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft systems methodology in action. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto
Farina A (2006) Principles and methods of landscape ecology. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands
Freebairn DM, King CA (2003) Reflections on collectively working toward sustainability: indicators for indicators. Aust J Exp Agric 43:223–238
High Performance Systems Incorporated (2003) Version 8 for Windows. STELLA, Altura Software Inc
Jesinghaus, J (2000). The World Economic Forum’s Environmental Sustainability Index: Strong and weak points, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy. Review posted on the internet, April 9 2000
Meter K (1999) Neighbourhood sustainability indicators guidebook. Crossroads Resource Center, Minneapolis
OECD (1993) OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews. A synthesis report by the group on the state of the environment, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
OECD (1997). Environmental indicators for agriculture. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
Reed MS, Dougill AJ (2003) Facilitating grass-roots sustainable development through sustainability indicators: a Kalahari case study. In: Proceedings of the international conference on sustainability indicators, 6–8 November, Malta 2003
Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper No. 72. Institute for Development Studies, Sussex
Smyth AJ, Dumanski G (1995) A framework for evaluating sustainable land management. Can J of Soil Sci 75:401–406
Stem C, Margoluis R, Salafsky N et al (2005) Monitoring and Evaluation in Conservation: A review of Trends and Approaches. Conserv Biol 19(2):295–309
UNCSD (1996) Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies, United Nations, New York
Wells MP, McShane TO, (eds) (2004) Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards more effective conservation and development. Columbia Uiversity Press, New York
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all participants of the three workshops for their valuable input in developing this tool.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sayer, J., Campbell, B., Petheram, L. et al. Assessing environment and development outcomes in conservation landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 16, 2677–2694 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9079-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9079-9