Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental study of low-rank coals using simultaneous thermal analysis (TG–DTA) techniques under air conditions and radiation level characterization

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simultaneous thermal analysis (TG–DTA) of low-rank coals from different annual periods (2015 and 2018) which originate from Kolubara and Nikola Tesla A (TENT A) coal-fired power plants was studied to identify their combustion characteristics and self-ignition risks. In order to investigate kinetics of thermo-oxidative degradation, model-free models including the Friedman and Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose methods were applied. In accordance with obtained kinetic results, numerical optimization of combustion process was implemented. Homogeneous and heterogeneous types of ignition were identified for the tested coals, and factors that affect their occurrence are the used heating rate and volatile matter content. From thermal susceptibility graph, it was found that the tested coals expand in a wide range of self-ignition risk, depending on their coal rank. The youngest coal (TENT A (2018)) has the largest propensity to self-ignite among high-ranking coals. It was found that less tendency of 2018 coals to show true isokinetic temperature in comparison with 2015 coals is a consequence of intraparticle diffusion limitations, and change of char properties, at higher conversion values. Gamma spectrometry analysis of coals showed that higher concentration of 40K radionuclide (which is in mineral composition) may contribute through its deposition on available sites, decreasing surface area for reaction with oxidizing species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang H, Dlugogorski BZ, Kennedy EM. Coal oxidation at low temperatures: oxygen consumption, oxidation products, reaction mechanism and kinetic modeling. Prog Energy Comb Sci. 2003;29:487–513.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hurskainen M, Vainikka P. Technology Options for Large-scale Solid-Fuel Combustion, Ch. 7, In: Fuel Flexible Energy Generation: Solid, Liquid and Gaseous Fuels. Oakey J (Ed.), ISBN:978-1-78242-378-2, Elsevier Ltd., The Netherlands, doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/c2014-0-01769-8, 2016, pp. 177-199.

  3. Kök MV. Recent developments in the application of thermal analysis techniques in fossil fuels. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2008;91(3):763–73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herce C, de Caprariis B, Stendardo S, Verdone N, De Filippis P. Comparison of global models of sub-bituminous coal devolatilization by means of thermogravimetric analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117:507–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cong K, Zhang Y, Gan Y, Li Q. Experimental study of the ignition temperatures of low-rank coals using TGA under oxygen-deficient conditions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133:1597–607.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kök MV. Non-isothermal DSC and TG/DTG analysis of the combustion of Si̇lopi̇ asphaltites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2007;88(3):663–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jayaraman K, Bonifaci E, Merlo N, Gökalp I. High Ash Indian and Turkish Coal Pyrolysis and Gasification Studies in Various Ambiences. MCS 8, 8-13, Çeşme, Izmir, Turkey, 2013.

  8. De Korányi A. Coal characterisation by thermal analysis. Thermochim Acta. 1987;110:527–33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohalik NK, Panigrahi DC, Singh VK. Application of thermal analysis techniques to assess proneness of coal to spontaneous heating. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;98:507–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Elbeyli Y, Pişkin S. Combustion and pyrolysis characteristics of Tunçbilek lignite. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2006;83(3):721–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Varol M, Atimtay AT, Bay B, Olgun H. Investigation of co-combustion characteristics of low quality lignite coals and biomass with thermogravimetric analysis. Thermochim Acta. 2010;510(20):195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gil MV, Casal D, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F. Thermal behavior and kinetics of coal/biomass blends during co-combustion. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:5601–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Galwey AK. Theory of solid-state thermal decomposition kinetics—scientific stagnation or chemical catastrophe? An alternative approach appraised and advocated. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;109:1625–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vyazovkin S. Model-free kinetics—staying free of multiplying entities without necessity. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2006;83(1):45–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Friedman HL. Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. J Polym Sci C Poly Symp. 1964;6(1):183–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kissinger HE. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem. 1957;29:1702–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Akahira T, Sunose T. Method of determining activation deterioration constant of electrical insulating materials. Res Rep Chiba Inst Technol (Sci Technol). 1971;16:22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM D2013/D2013M-18. Standard practice for preparing coal samples for analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.

  19. ASTM D3172-13. Standard practice for proximate analysis of coal and coke. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.

  20. ASTM D3176-15. Standard practice for ultimate analysis of coal and coke. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.

  21. ASTM D388. Standard classification of coals by rank. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.

  22. IAEA. Measurement of the radionuclides in food and the environment. Technical Report Series, No. 295, Vienna, Austria, 1989.

  23. Vidmar T. EFFTRAN—a Monte Carlo efficiency transfer code for gamma-ray spectrometry. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res A. 2005;550:603–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang H, Dlugogorski BZ, Kennedy EM. Kinetic modeling of low-temperature oxidation of coal. Combust Flame. 2002;131:452–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. International Classification of In-Seam Coals, Economic Commission for Europe, Committee on Sustainable Energy, United nations, New York and Geneva, 1998.

  26. Krishnaiah J, Lawrence A, Dhanuskodi R. Artificial neural networks model for predicting ultimate analysis using proximate analysis of coal. Int J Comp Appl. 2012;44:9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ritz M, Klika Z. Determination of minerals in coal by methods based on the recalculation of the bulk chemical analyses. Acta Geodyn Geomater. 2010;7:453–60.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ptasinski KJ. Efficiency of biomass energy, an exergy approach to biofuels, power, and biorefineries. Hoboken: Wiley; 2016. p. 203–6. ISBN 978-1-118-70210-9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Annamalai K, Puri IK. Combustion science and engineering CRC series in computational mechanics and applied analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2007. p. 156–68. ISBN 0-8493-2071-2.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Luo R, Zhou Q. Combustion kinetic behavior of different ash contents coals co-firing with biomass and the interaction analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;128:567–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Taş S, Yürüm Y. Co-firing of biomass with coals. Part 2. Thermogravimetric kinetic analysis of combustion of fir (Abies bornmulleriana) wood with Beypazari lignite. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;107(1):293–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mortari DA, Torquato LDM, Crespi MS, Crnkovic PM. Co-firing of blends of sugarcane bagasse and coal—thermal and kinetic behaviors. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;132(2):1333–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Basu P, Butler J, Leon MA. Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants. Renew Energy. 2011;36:282–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Oteroa M. Co-combustion of different sewage sludge and coal: a non-isothermal thermogravimetric kinetic analysis. Biores Technol. 2008;99:6311–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gavalas GR. Coal pyrolysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1982. p. 51–5.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Field MA. Rate of combustion of size-graded fractions of char from a low-rank coal between 1200 K and 2000 K. Combust Flame. 1969;13:237–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu W-C, Tomita A. The effects of temperature and residence time on the secondary reactions of volatiles from coal pyrolysis. Fuel Process Technol. 1989;21:25–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Y, Mori S, Pan WP. Studying the mechanisms of ignition of coal particles by TG-DTA. Thermochim Acta. 1996;275:149–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Serageldin MA, Pan WP. Coal analysis using thermogravimetry. Thermochim Acta. 1984;76:145–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li Z, Wen H, Shu C-M, Laiwang B, Li B, Xiao Y, Wei G. Thermokinetic behavior and microcharacterization of low-rank bitumiteoxidization. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08003-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cumming JW. Reactivity assessment of coals via a weighted mean activation energy. Fuel. 1984;63:1436–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tishmack JK, Burns PE. The chemistry and mineralogy of coal and coal combustion products. In: Energy, waste and the environment: a geochemical perspective. Geological Society Special Publication 236, Gieré R, Stille P (Eds.), Geological Society from The Geological Society Publishing House Unit 7, Brassmill Enterprise Centre, Brassmill Lane, London, UK, 2004. pp. 223–230.

  43. Grammelis P. Solid biofuels for energy. A lower greenhouse gas alternative. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 200–2. ISBN 978-1-84996-392-3.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Janković MM, Todorović DJ, Nikolić JD. Analysis of natural radionuclides in coal, slag and ash in coal-fired power plants in Serbia. J Min Metal B. 2011;47:149–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia under the projects 172015, 172056, and III43009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marija Janković.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janković, M., Janković, B., Marinović-Cincović, M. et al. Experimental study of low-rank coals using simultaneous thermal analysis (TG–DTA) techniques under air conditions and radiation level characterization. J Therm Anal Calorim 142, 547–564 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09288-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09288-5

Keywords

Navigation