Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thermal degradation kinetics study and thermal cracking of waste cooking oil for biofuel production

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thermal cracking of waste cooking oil (WCO) for production of liquid fuel has gained special interest due to the growing demand of renewable fuel, depleting fossil fuel reserves and environmental issues. In the present work, thermal cracking of WCO to produce liquid hydrocarbon fuels without any preprocessing has been studied. Moreover, non-isothermal kinetics of WCO using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) has been studied under an inert atmosphere at various heating rates. According to TGA result, active thermal decomposition of WCO was found to be between 318 and 500 °C. Furthermore, the temperature at which the maximum mass loss rate attained was shifted to higher values as the heating rates increased from 10 to 50 °C min−1 and the values were found to be approximately similar to that of R 50. Besides, model-free iso-conversion kinetic methods such as Friedman (FM), Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS) and Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO) were used to determine the activation energies of WCO degradation. The average activation energy for the thermal degradation of WCO was found to be 243.7, 211.23 and 222 kJ mol−1 for FM, KAS and FWO kinetic methods, respectively. Additionally, the cracking of WCO was studied in a semi-batch reactor under an inert atmosphere and the influences of cracking temperature, time and heating rates on product distribution were investigated. From the reaction, an optimum yield of 72 mass% was obtained at a temperature of 475 °C, time of 180 min and a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The physicochemical properties studied were in accordance with ASTM standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Santos AG, Caldeira VP, Farias MF, Araújo AS, Souza LD, Barros AK. Characterization and kinetic study of sunflower oil and biodiesel. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2011;106:747–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ong YK, Bhatia S. The current status and perspectives of biofuel production via catalytic cracking of edible and non-edible oils. Energy. 2010;35:111–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdullah NH, Hasan SH, Yusoff NRM. Biodiesel production based on waste cooking oil (WCO). Int J Comput Mater Sci Eng. 2013;1:94–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taufiqurrahmi N, Bhatia S. Catalytic cracking of edible and non-edible oils for the production of biofuels. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4:1087–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Demirbas A. Progress and recent trends in biofuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2007;33:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goyal H, Seal D, Saxena R. Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2008;12:504–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hua T, Chunyi L, Chaohe Y, Honghong S. Alternative processing technology for converting vegetable oils and animal fats to clean fuels and light olefins. Chin J Chem Eng. 2008;16:394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silva AAL, Oliveira DS, Fernandes FRD, Santos AGD, Caldeira VPS, Souza LD. Catalytic cracking of sunflower oil under Zr catalysts using thermogravimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017. doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6202-y.

  9. Rajeshwar K. The kinetics of the thermal decomposition of green river oil shale kerogen by non-isothermal thermogravimetry. Thermochim Acta. 1981;45:253–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Torrente M, Galan M. Kinetics of the thermal decomposition of oil shale from Puertollano (Spain). Fuel. 2001;80:327–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kok MV. Thermal investigation of Seyitomer oil shale. Thermochim Acta. 2001;369:149–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Karabakan A, Yürüm Y. Effect of the mineral matrix in the reactions of oil shales. Fuel. 1998;7:1303–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaber J, Probert S. Non-isothermal thermogravimetry and decomposition kinetics of two Jordanian oil shales under different processing conditions. Fuel Process Technol. 2000;63:57–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reshad AS, Tiwari P, Goud VV. Thermal decomposition and kinetics of residual rubber seed cake and shell. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;129:577–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leroy V, Cancellieri D, Leoni E, Rossi JL. Kinetic study of forest fuels by TGA: model-free kinetic approach for the prediction of phenomena. Thermochim Acta. 2010;497:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mominou N, Xian S, Jiaoliang X. Studies on coprocessing vacuum residue oil with plastics using thermogravimetric analysis. Pet Sci Technol. 2009;27:588–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gornicka B, Gorecki L. TGA/DTG/DSC investigation of thermal ageing effects on polyamide–imide enamel. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;101:647–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. López F, Mercê A, Alguacil F, López-Delgado A. A kinetic study on the thermal behavior of chitosan. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2007;91:633–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sułkowski W, Danch A, Moczyński M, Radoń A, Sułkowska S, Borek J. Thermogravimetric study of rubber waste-polyurethane composites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2004;78:905–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Freire L, Bicudo T, Rosenhaim R, Sinfrônio F, Botelho J, Carvalho Filho J, et al. Thermal investigation of oil and biodiesel from Jatropha curcas L. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;96:1029–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Coats AW, Redfern J. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature. 1964;201:68–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Doyle C. Kinetic analysis of thermogravimetric data. J Appl Polym Sci. 1961;5:285–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee T, Beck S. A new integral approximation formula for kinetic analysis of nonisothermal TGA data. AIChE J. 1984;30:517–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Flynn JH, Wall LA. A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data. J Polym Sci. 1966;4:323–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozawa T. A new method of analyzing thermogravimetric data. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1965;38:1881–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kissinger HE. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem. 1957;29:1702–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Friedman HL. Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. J Polym Sci. 1964;6:183–95.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Volli V, Purkait M. Physico-chemical properties and thermal degradation studies of commercial oils in nitrogen atmosphere. Fuel. 2014;117:1010–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Borugadda VB, Goud VV. Biodiesel production from renewable feedstocks: status and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:4763–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Alptekin E, Canakci M. Determination of the density and the viscosities of biodiesel–diesel fuel blends. J Renew Energy. 2008;33:2623–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Slopiecka K, Bartocci P, Fantozzi F. Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic study of poplar wood pyrolysis. Appl Energy. 2012;97:491–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Taufiqurrahmi N, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S. Production of biofuel from waste cooking palm oil using nanocrystalline zeolite as catalyst: process optimization studies. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:10686–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nazzal JM. Influence of heating rate on the pyrolysis of Jordan oil shale. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2002;62:225–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lima DG, Soares VC, Ribeiro EB, Carvalho DA, Cardoso ÉC, Rassi FC, et al. Diesel-like fuel obtained by pyrolysis of vegetable oils. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2004;71:987–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. WiggersV Meier H, Wisniewski A, Barros AC, Maciel MW. Biofuels from continuous fast pyrolysis of soybean oil: a pilot plant study. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:6570–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Onay O, Koçkar OM. Pyrolysis of rapeseed in a free fall reactor for production of bio-oil. Fuel. 2006;85:1921–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lestari S, Mäki-Arvela P, Beltramini J, Lu G, Murzin DY. Transforming triglycerides and fatty acids into biofuels. Chemsuschem. 2009;2:1109–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin YF, Wu YP, Chang CT. Combustion characteristics of waste-oil produced biodiesel/diesel fuel blends. J Fuels. 2007;86:1772–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Li L, Ding Z, Li K, Xu J, Liu F, Liu S, et al. Liquid hydrocarbon fuels from catalytic cracking of waste cooking oils using ultrastable zeolite USY as catalyst. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2016;117:268–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao X, Wei L, Cheng S, Cao Y, Julson J, Gu Z. Catalytic cracking of carinata oil for hydrocarbon biofuel over fresh and regenerated Zn/Na–ZSM-5. Appl Catal. 2015;507:44–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gary J, Handwerk G. Petroleum refining technology and economics. 4th ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mota SD, Mancio A, Lhamas D, Abreu DD, Silva MD, Santos WD, et al. Production of green diesel by thermal catalytic cracking of crude palm oil (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) in a pilot plant. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2014;110:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ullah Z, Bustam MA, Man Z. Characterization of waste palm cooking oil for biodiesel production. Int J Chem Eng Appl. 2014;5:134–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Qiu F, Li Y, Yang D, Li X, Sun P. Biodiesel production from mixed soybean oil and rapeseed oil. Appl Energy. 2011;88:2050–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Monteiro MR, Ambrozin ARP, et al. Evaluation of biodiesel–diesel blends quality using 1H NMR and chemometrics. Talanta. 2009;78:660–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Şensöz S, Demiral I, Gerçel HF. Olive bagasse (Olea europea L.) pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97:429–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Department of Chemical Engineering and Centre for Instrument Facility (CIF) for the provision of analytical facilities to carry out the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India

    Fekadu Mosisa Wako, Ali Shemshedin Reshad & Vaibhav V. Goud

Authors
  1. Fekadu Mosisa Wako
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Shemshedin Reshad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vaibhav V. Goud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vaibhav V. Goud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wako, F.M., Reshad, A.S. & Goud, V.V. Thermal degradation kinetics study and thermal cracking of waste cooking oil for biofuel production. J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 2157–2165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6760-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6760-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation