Abstract
We theoretically investigate the Seebeck and Peltier effect across an interacting quantum dot (QD) coupled between a normal metal and a Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer superconductor within the Coulomb blockade regime. Our results demonstrate that the thermoelectric conversion efficiency at optimal power output (optimized with respect to QD energy level and external serial load) in NQDS nanodevice can reach up to \(58\%\eta _\text{C}\), where \(\eta _\text{C}\) is Carnot efficiency, with output power \(P_{\text {max}}\approx 35\,\text{fW}\) for temperature below the superconducting transition temperature. Further, the Peltier cooling effect is observed for a wide range of parameter regimes, which can be optimized by varying the background thermal energy, QD level energy, QD-reservoir tunneling strength, and bias voltage. The results presented in this study are within the scope of existing experimental capabilities for designing miniature hybrid devices that operate at cryogenic temperatures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Krawiec, Acta Phys. Pol. A 114, 115 (2008). https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.114.115
K.I. Wysokiński, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 24, 335303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/24/33/335303
S.Y. Hwang, R. López, D. Sánchez, Phys. Rev. B 91, 104518 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.104518
B. Sothmann, R. Sánchez, A.N. Jordan, Nanotechnology 26, 032001 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/26/3/032001
S.Y. Hwang, D. Sánchez, R. López, New J. Phys. 18, 093024 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093024
S.Y. Hwang, R. López, D. Sánchez, Phys. Rev. B 94, 054506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.054506
D. Sánchez, R. López, C. R. Phys. 17, 1060 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2016.08.005
W.P. Xu, Y.Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, Z.J. Li, Y.H. Nie, Phys. Lett. A 380, 958 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.12.032
Y. Kleeorin, Y. Meir, F. Giazotto, Y. Dubi, Sci. Rep. 6, 35116 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35116
L. Xu, Z. Li, Q. Wang, Y. Nie, AIP Adv. 6, 125012 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4971844
G. Benenti, G. Casati, K. Saito, R.S. Whitney, Phys. Rep. 694, 1–124 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.008
S.-Y. Hwang, D. Sánchez, R. López, Eur. Phys. J. B 90, 189 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2017-80242-1
P. Trocha, J. Barnaś, Phys. Rev. B 95, 165439 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.165439
S.-Y. Hwang, D. Sánchez, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 969, 012139 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/969/1/012139
H. Yao, C. Zhang, Z.-J. Li, Y.-H. Nie, P.-B. Niu, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 51, 175301 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aab6e4
H. Yao, C. Zhang, P.-B. Niu, Z.-J. Li, Y.-H. Nie, Phys. Lett. A 382, 3220 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2018.08.033
M. Kamp, B. Sothmann, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045428 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.045428
S. Verma, A. Singh, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 34, 155601 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac4ced
S.M. Tabatabaei, D. Sánchez, A.L. Yeyati, R. Sánchez, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115419 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.115419
H. Yao, C.-P. Cheng, L.-L. Li, R. Guo, Y. Guo, C. Zhang, Nanoscale Adv. 5, 1199 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NA00838F
B. Kumar, S. Verma, Ajay, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 36, 831 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-023-06526-3
S.-Y. Hwang, B. Sothmann, D. Sánchez, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245412 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.245412
A. Martín-Rodero, A.L. Yeyati, Adv. Phys. 60, 899–958 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2011.624266
F. Giazotto, T.T. Heikkilä, A. Luukanen, A.M. Savin, J.P. Pekola, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 217 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.78.217
E.A. Laird, F. Kuemmeth, G.A. Steele, K. Grove-Rasmussen, J. Nygård, K. Flensberg, L.P. Kouwenhoven, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 703 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.703
J.P. Pekola, B. Karimi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.041001
L.D. Hicks, M.S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 47, 12727 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12727
L.D. Hicks, M.S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 47, 16631(R) (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.16631
L.D. Hicks, T.C. Harman, X. Sun, M.S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 53, R10493(R) (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.R10493
G.D. Mahan, J.O. Sofo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 7436 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.15.743
M. Josefsson, A. Svilans, A.M. Burke, E.A. Hoffmann, S. Fahlvik, C. Thelander, M. Leijnse, H. Linke, Nat. Nanotech 13, 920–924 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0200-5
M. Josefsson, A. Svilans, H. Linke, M. Leijnse, Phys. Rev. B 99, 235432 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.235432
D. Majidi, M. Josefsson, M. Kumar, M. Leijnse, L. Samuelson, H. Courtois, C.B. Winkelmann, V.F. Maisi, Nano Lett. 22, 630–635 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03437
A.S. Dzurak, C.G. Smith, M. Pepper, D.A. Ritchie, J.E.F. Frost, G.A.C. Jones, D.G. Hasko, Solid State Commun. 87, 1145–1149 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(93)90819-9
L. Molenkamp, A.A.M. Staring, B.W. Alphenaar, H. van Houten, C.W.J. Beenakker, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 9, 903 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/9/5S/136
D. Prete, P.A. Erdman, V. Demontis, V. Zannier, D. Ercolani, L. Sorba, F. Beltram, F. Rossella, F. Taddei, S. Roddaro, Nano Lett. 91, 3033–3039 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00276
J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 276, 238–257 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1963.0204
Hartmut J.W. Haug, A-P. Jauho, Quantum Kinetics in Transport and Optics of Semiconductors:, Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 123 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, HD, 2008) Ch.12, p.181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73564-9
L.V. Keldysh, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1515–1527 (1964) [Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1018 (1965)]. http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/talks/CMTjournalclub/sources/Keldysh.pdf
Yigal Meir, Ned S. Wingreen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2512 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2512
J.-S. Wang, J. Wang, N. Zeng, Phys. Rev. B 74, 033408 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.033408
J.-S. Wang, B.K. Agarwalla, H. Li, J. Thingna, Front. Phys. 9, 673–697 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-013-0340-x
K. Yamamoto, N. Hatano, Phys. Rev. E 92, 042165 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.042165
F.C. Wellstood, C. Urbina, J. Clarke, Phys. Rev. B 49, 5942 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.5942
J.C. Cuevas, A. Martín-Rodero, A.L. Yeyati, Phys. Rev. B 54, 7366 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.7366
T.K. Ng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 487 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.487
Acknowledgements
Sachin Verma is presently a research scholar at the department of physics IIT Roorkee and is highly thankful to the Ministry of Education (MoE), India, for providing financial support in the form of a Ph.D. fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
In this section, we present the calculation for the Green’s functions and occupancy of the QD. In Nambu representation, we define the single particle retarded Green’s function of the QD as a \(2\times 2\) matrices [45]
where the diagonal components of \(\mathbf{{G}}^{r}_{d}(\omega )\) represents the single particle retarded Green’s function of electron with spin \(\sigma =\uparrow\) and hole with spin \(\sigma =\downarrow\) , respectively. The off-diagonal component represents the superconducting paring correlation on the QD. The Fourier transform of the single particle retarded Green’s function for QD
where \(\theta (t)\) is Heaviside function, must satisfy the following EOM [38]
By evaluating different commutator and anti-commutator brackets we drive the following coupled equations for the single particle Green’s functions
The terms with summations over k appearing in above equations can be simplified by replacing \(\sum _k \rightarrow \int {\rho (\epsilon )d\epsilon }\) and then solving these expressions using the complex contour integration in the wide-band limit. Finally after solving above coupled equations, we arrive at the expression for the retarded Green’s function of electron with spin \(\sigma =\uparrow\) and off-diagonal superconducting pairing correlation on the QD, i.e.,
where
and
where \(\rho _S(\omega )\) is the modified BCS density of states, with the real part accounting for the Andreev bound states within the superconducting gap. The other matrix elements is given by \(G_{d,22}^{r}(\omega )=-G_{d,11}^{r}(-\omega )^{*}\) and \(G_{d,12}^{r}(\omega )=G_{d,21}^{r}(-\omega )^{*}\). These retarded Green’s functions allow us to calculate the advanced and lesser/greater Green’s functions and eventually the thermoelectric transport properties.
The average occupancy on the quantum dot (\(\langle {n_{\uparrow }}\rangle\)=\(\langle {n_{\downarrow }}\rangle\) for non-magnetic system) is calculated using the self-consistent integral equation of the form
where the lesser Green’s function \(G^{<}_{d}\) obeys the Keldysh equation [38, 39]
The advanced Green’s function matrix is \(\mathbf{{G}}^{a}_{d\sigma }(\omega )=\left[ \mathbf{{G}}^{r}_{d\sigma }(\omega )\right] ^{\dagger }\) and the lesser self-energy matrix is obtained using Ng ansatz [38, 46], i.e.,
This ansatz satisfies the continuity equation in steady state, allowing us to derive the lesser Green’s function to examine the transport properties.
Now using retarded and advanced self-energy, we get
with
Now, multiplying matrices in the expression of \(\mathbf{{G}}^{<}_{d\sigma }(\omega )\), we get the lesser Green’s function for electrons on the QD as
where \(f_{\alpha \in N,S}(\omega \mp \mu _{\alpha })=\left[ {exp((\omega \mp \mu _{\alpha })/k_BT_{\alpha })+1}\right] ^{-1}\) is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function of reservoirs with temperature \(T_{\alpha }\) and chemical potential \(\pm \mu _{\alpha }\) (measured from Fermi level \(\mu _f=0\)).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Verma, S., Singh, A. Seebeck Power Generation and Peltier Cooling in a Normal Metal-Quantum Dot-Superconductor Nanodevice. J Low Temp Phys 214, 344–359 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-024-03047-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-024-03047-8