Skip to main content
Log in

Female Promiscuity Does Not Lead to Increased Fertility or Fecundity in an Arctiid Moth (Utetheisa ornatrix)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior work has demonstrated significant phenotypic benefits to female promiscuity in the arctiid moth Utetheisa ornatrix. We were interested in determining whether U. ornatrix females also derive genetic benefits from mating multiply. We specifically tested whether, by mating with several males, females are able to exploit postcopulatory mechanisms that decrease the risk of fertilization by incompatible sperm. We show evidence that U. ornatrix females are not taking multiple mates as fertilization insurance because: (1) females that mate once are as fertile as those that mate three times; and (2) females that take three different mates are no more fertile than those that mate three times with the same male.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav 60:145–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW (1998) Mate preference for novel partners in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Ecol Ent 23:473–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezzerides A, Eisner T (2002) Apportionment of nuptial alkaloidal gifts by a multiply-mated female moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): eggs individually receive alkaloid from more than one male source. Chemoecology 12:213–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bezzerides A, Iyengar VK, Eisner T (2005) Corematal function in Utetheisa ornatrix: interpretation in the light of data from field-collected males. Chemoecology 15:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Moller AP (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner F, Eisner T (1991) Chemical basis of egg cannibalism in a caterpillar (Utetheisa ornatrix). J Chem Ecol 17:2063–2075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bogner F, Eisner T (1992) Chemical basis of pupal cannibalism in a caterpillar (Utetheisa ornatrix). Experientia 48:97–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker MG, Rowley I, Adams M, Baverstock PR (1990) Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L (1995) Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coltman DW, Bancroft DR, Robertson A, Smith JA, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM (1999) Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioral estimates compared with genetic paternity. Mol Ecol 8:1199–1209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conner WE, Eisner T, Vander Meer RK, Guerrero A, Meinwald J (1981) Precopulatory sexual interaction in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): role of a pheromone derived from dietary alkaloids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner WE, Roach B, Benedict E, Meinwald J, Eisner T (1990) Courtship pheromone production and body size as correlates of larval diet in males of the arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix. J Chem Ecol 16:542–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drnevich JM, Papke RS, Rauser CL, Rutowski RL (2001) Material benefits from multiple mating in female mealworm beetles (Tenebrio molitor L.). J Insect Behav 14:215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussourd DE, Ubik K, Harvis C, Resch J, Meinwald J, Eisner T (1988) Biparental defensive endowment of eggs with acquired plant alkaloid in the moth Utetheisa ornatrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:5992–5996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T, Meinwald J (1987) Alkaloid-derived pheromone and sexual selection in Lepidoptera. In: Prestwich GD, Blumquist GJ (eds) Pheromone biochemistry. Academic, Orlando, FL, USA, pp 251–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T, Eisner M (1991) Unpalatability of the pyrrolizidine alkaloid containing moth, Utetheisa ornatrix, and its larva, to wolf spiders. Psyche 98:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T, Meinwald J (1995) The chemistry of sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:50–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T, Eisner M, Rossini C, Iyengar VK, Roach BL, Benedikt E, Meinwald J (2000) Chemical defense against predation in an insect egg. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:1634–1639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Rauter CM (2003) Bet-hedging and the evolution of multiple mating. Ecol Evol Res 5:273–286

    Google Scholar 

  • González A, Rossini C, Eisner M, Eisner T (1999) Sexually transmitted chemical defense in a moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5570–5574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare JF, Eisner T (1993) Pyrrolizidine alkaloid deters ant predators of Utetheisa ornatrix eggs: effects of alkaloid concentration, oxidation state, and prior exposure of ants to alkaloid-laden prey. Oecologia 96:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken DJ, Martin OY, Born J, Huber F (2003) Sexual conflict in Sepsis cynipsea: female reluctance, fertility and mate choice. J Evol Biol 16:485–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C (1998) Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behavior: a revolution results. Mol Ecol 79:383–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivy TM, Sakaluk SK (2005) Polyandry promotes enhanced offspring survival in decorated crickets. Evolution 59:152–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75:21–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LaMunyon CW (1997) Increased fecundity as a function of multiple mating, in an arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix. Ecol Entomol 22:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaMunyon CW, Eisner T (1994) Spermatophore size as determinant of paternity in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:7081–7084

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Fowler K (1990) Non-mating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila melanogaster. J Ins Physiol 36:419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Green A, Fowler K (1987) Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster. J Ins Physiol 10:745–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossini C, González A, Eisner T (2001) Fate of an alkaloidal nuptial gift in the moth Utetheisa ornatrix: systemic allocation for defense of self by the receiving female. J Ins Physiol 47:639–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarver M (2002) Multiple mating and mate choice in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Undergraduate thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

  • Schwartz SK, Peterson MA (2006) Strong material benefits and no longevity costs of multiple mating in an extremely polyandrous leaf beetle, Chrysochus cobaltinus (Coleoptera: Chrosomelidae). Behav Ecol 17:1004–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockley P, Searle JB, MacDonald DW, Jones CS (1993) Female multiple mating in the common shrew as a strategy to reduce inbreeding. Proc R Soc Lond B 254:173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N (2002) Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415:71–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner WE, Kelley RJ, Tucker KR, Harper CJ (2001) Females receive a life-span benefit from male ejaculates in a field cricket. Evolution 55:994–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmer JW, Overall AJ, Pomeroy PP, Twiss SD, Amos W (2000) Patterns of paternal relatedness in British grey seal colonies. Mol Ecol 9:283–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfner MF (1997) Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Ins Biochem Molec Biol 27:179–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1711–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1997) The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant AI02908 (T. E.) and National Institutes of Mental Health training grant 5T32MH15793 (A. B.) We thank H. Kern Reeve, Jerrold Meinwald, and David P. McCobb for comments on the manuscript and Julie Bezzerides for technical assistance and help in maintaining the moth culture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander L. Bezzerides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bezzerides, A.L., Iyengar, V.K. & Eisner, T. Female Promiscuity Does Not Lead to Increased Fertility or Fecundity in an Arctiid Moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). J Insect Behav 21, 213–221 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-008-9121-8

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-008-9121-8

Keywords

Navigation