Abstract
[Fe(TPA)Cl2](ClO4), where TPA is tris-(2-pyridylmethyl)amine, crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P212121 with Z = 4, a = 8.6264(10) Å, b = 15.459(3) Å, and c = 16.008(3) Å. The structure was determined at 110 K from 4333 reflections (3520 observed) with R = 0.041 (Rw = 0.082). The iron is pseudo-octahedral with the two chloride ions cis. The Fe-Cl bond trans to the tertiary amine is shorter. [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O](ClO4)2 exhibits two polymorphic monoclinic forms, and the monohydrate also crystallizes in a monoclinic form. For the P21/c polymorph, Z = 2, a = 10.839(2) Å, b = 15.956(3) Å, c = 12.416(2) Å, β = 107.024(10)°, and the structure was determined at 95 K from 6514 reflections (3974 observed) with R = 0.052 (Rw = 0.099). For the C2/c polymorph, Z = 4, a = 20.5023(17) Å, b = 15.2711(13) Å, c = 16.1069(11) Å, β = 124.465(4)°, and the structure was determined at 161 K from 6250 reflections (3130 observed) with R = 0.0632 (Rw = 0.1229). For the hydrate, P21/n, Z = 4, a = 16.201(2) Å, b = 16.980(3), c = 16.451(3), β = 112.234(5)°, and the structure was determined at 100 K from 12,745 reflections (6600 observed) with R = 0.097 (Rw = 0.190). In each of the [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O]2+ units, each iron is pseudo-octahedral with the chloride and oxide ions cis. The oxide bridge is linear, and the two chlorides are anti. The Fe-N distance for the pyridyl ring trans to the oxide bridge is quite long due to the trans influence of the oxide.
Graphic Abstract
The X-ray structures of [Fe(TPA)Cl2](ClO4), where TPA is tris-(2-pyridylmethyl)amine, and three polymorphs of dimeric [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O](ClO4)2 are presented and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Tris-(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA), also known as tris-(2-picolyl)amine, is a widely used tripodal ligand [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. It can simultaneously provide four nitrogen donors (three pyridyl nitrogen atoms and a tertiary amine nitrogen) to a single metal center, thus leaving one or two available coordination sites. TPA complexes with most of the 3d metals are known including V(III), V(IV), V(V) [2], Cr(II) [3], Cr(III) [3,4,5], Mn(II) [6], Mn(III) [7], Mn(IV) [7], Fe(II) [8,9,10], Fe(III) [11,12,13,14,15,16], Co(III) [17], Ni(II) [18, 19], Cu(I) [20], Cu(II) [20,21,22,23], and Zn(II) [24, 25].
Because of the relative control over the metal site, iron complexes of TPA, and various substituted forms of TPA, have been used to model the metal-binding site of various metalloproteins, and have been extensively explored as catalysts for alkane functionalization [11,12,13, 26,27,28]. Given that, for octahedral complexes, one of the additional ligand atoms will be trans to a pyridine nitrogen atom and the other will be trans to the tertiary amine nitrogen atom, structural investigations are important to fully assess the trans influence of these two moieties, and to assess the extent of possible cis influences as well.
Herein we report the syntheses and structures of [Fe(TPA)Cl2](ClO4) (1) and [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O](ClO4)2 (various forms 2, 3, and 4). These studies originated in the 1990s at Duquesne University, but were only reported in a M.S. thesis at that time [29]. The contact author moved from Duquesne University to the University of Louisiana at Monroe in 1997. While it might have been possible to scan the original data collection paper output and using optical character recognition software, recreate a digital version of the data collection, we decided instead to re-grow the crystals, re-collect the data, re-solve the structures, and re-refine them. This proved to be more involved than anticipated, since [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O](ClO4)2 presents as various polymorphs and solvates [14, 15, 30,31,32].
Synthesis
[Fe(TPA)Cl2](ClO4) (1). A mixture of 0.1480 g of TPA•3HClO4 (0.2500 millimole) and 35.0 μL (0.251 millimole) of triethylamine in 20 mL methanol was warmed (to ~60 °C) and stirred to dissolve all of the ligand. After the solution cooled to room temperature, 0.0292 g of NaCl (0.500 millimole) and 0.1336 g of Fe(ClO4)3•10H2O (0.2500 millimole) were added resulting in a yellow solution. A white powdery precipitate formed in a few minutes. After stirring for 30 min, the mixture was filtered, and the yellow filtrate was allowed to stand at room temperature for 6 days during which time yellow, needle-like crystals formed which were suitable for X-ray crystallography. UV: 300 nm (sh), 384 nm (ε = 3.3 mM−1 cm−1) 1H NMR (ppm) 167, 138, 114, 99.
[{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O](ClO4)2 (2,3,4) is often obtained under a variety of other reaction conditions as a by-product or un-anticipated major product. Here is an intentional preparation. A mixture of 0.1480 g of TPA•3HClO4 (0.2500 millimole) and 160.0 μL (1.148 millimole) of triethylamine in 20 mL methanol was warmed (to ~60 °C) and stirred to dissolve all of the ligand. After the solution cooled to room temperature, 0.0146 g of NaCl (0.250 millimole) and 0.1336 g of Fe(ClO4)3•10H2O (0.2500 millimole) were added resulting in a red-brown solution. A white powdery precipitate formed in a few minutes. After stirring for 30 min, the mixture was filtered, and the red-brown filtrate was allowed to stand at room temperature for 4 h during which time red-brown, plate-like crystals formed which were suitable for X-ray crystallography. UV 332 nm (ε = 15 mM−1 cm−1) 382 nm (ε = 17 mM−1 cm−1) 1H NMR (ppm) 34, 29, 20.2, 18, 16, 14, 13, 12, 7, 6.
All the perchlorate salts included in this work proved to be relatively stable for small scale routine synthesis and purification procedures. However, caution should be observed because perchlorate salts of metal complexes with organic ligands are potentially explosive.
X-ray Structure Determinations
Some details of the crystal and data collections are collected in Table 1. X-ray diffraction data were collected primarily at Louisiana State University (but also at the University of Washington) on a Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer using graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) and an Oxford Cryostream cryostat. Data were collected with ω and ϕ scans. Data reduction included corrections for background, Lorentz, polarization and absorption effects (by the multi-scan method (HKL Scalepack)) [34]. All structures were solved using direct methods [35] and expanded using Fourier techniques [36]. For 1, 2, and 4, all calculations were performed using the teXsan for Windows [37] crystallographic software package. Full-matrix least-squares refinement with anisotropic thermal parameters for all of the non-hydrogen atoms converged. The function minimized in refinement was Σw(Fo2 – Fc2)2 where w = 1/[σ2(Fo) + (p)2Fo2/4]. The hydrogen atoms were placed in idealized positions (C-H 0.95 Å), with Uiso = 1.2 Ueq of the attached atom. Neutral atom scattering factors were taken from Cromer and Waber [38]. Anomalous dispersion effects were included in Fc [39], and the values for Δf’ and Δf” were those of Creagh and McAuley [40]. The values for the mass attenuation coefficients were those of Creagh and Hubbell [41] (Table 2).
For 3, full-matrix least-squares refinement on F2 on all reflections used SHELXL97 [42]. All of the H atoms but one were located by difference Fourier synthesis. H atoms were refined with a riding model and Uiso values were fixed to be 1.1 Ueq of the parent atom.
For 2 and 3, the bridging O atom is located on an inversion center. For 1 and 4, there is no crystallographically imposed symmetry. The structure of 4 has been previously reported in the literature, [15] and the structure is included here for comparative purposes to give further context to the synthesis and structures of 1–3.
Spectroscopy
Electronic spectra were recorded either on a HP 8452A (a single beam, diode-array spectrophotometer) at Duquesne University, or a Shimadzu UV1601-PC at the University of Louisiana at Monroe (also a single beam, diode-array spectrophotometer), or a Jasco V-550 (a double-beam spectrophotometer) at Sam Houston State University. HPLC grade acetonitrile (99.9%) and 1 cm path length cuvettes were used.
NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature on a Bruker ACP300 at Duquesne University or a JEOL Eclipse +300 FT-NMR at Sam Houston State University. Both were operating at 300 MHz and 5 mm tubes were used. The acquisition conditions were 5.0 μsec pulses, 8192 data points, a scan width of 100,000 Hz, 0.0 relaxation delay, acquisition time 0.041 s in the former case, and 5.4 μsec, 8192 data points, 1 s relaxation time, x-offset 100 ppm, and x-sweep 200 ppm in the latter case. The number of scans ranged from 20,000 to 100,000. CD3CN (99.9%) was used as solvent and the residual proton signal of the solvent was assigned a chemical shift δ value of 1.94 ppm.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
The units [Fe(TPA)Cl2]+ and [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O]2+ have proven to be quite stable in a variety of systems. The systems investigated by most workers tend not to be extremely acidic, so the former is less common than the latter. The two units together were first reported [12, 13] when they co-crystalized. The oxido-bridged dimer has proven to be much more common. As mentioned above, it is a common by-product or an unintended product in systems where Fe(III), TPA, chloride and oxide are all present. We have obtained this product in systems while we were attempting to make compounds of the form [{Fe(TPA)}2OL]n+ where L is relatively poor Lewis base (for example, L = O2CCH2N(CH3)3) and in systems while we were attempting to make mononuclear compounds of the form [Fe(TPA)L’]3+ where L’ is a neutral bidentate ligand (for example, L’ = 2-picolylamine). In this latter case, the source of chloride was apparently reduction of ClO4− and in the former case it was chloride contamination.
X-ray Structures
The structure of yellow [Fe(TPA)Cl2](ClO4) is shown in Fig. 1. The complex cation has an octahedral Fe(III) center coordinated to four nitrogen atoms of TPA and two cis chloride ions. Two of the pyridyls are trans. One of the chlorides is trans to the tertiary amine and the other is trans to pyridine. This latter distance is the longer of the two Fe(III)-Cl distances (2.2900(8) Å vs. 2.2425(8) Å), and the corresponding Fe(III)-Npy is longer (2.204(2) Å) than the two Fe(III)-Npy distances that are mutually trans (2.144(2) and 2.119(2) Å). Coincidentally, the Fe-N3° distance is the same as the Fe- Npy trans to chloride. TPA isn’t able to fully span the trans positions, as indicated by the Npy-Fe-Npy angle of 151.53(9)° which is considerably less than 180°. This same mononuclear cationic unit is also found in [Fe(TPA)Cl2]2[{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O](ClO4)4 [13] and in [Fe(TPA)Cl2][FeCl4] [16], and the pattern of distances and angles are the same as found in 1.
The analogous Fe(II) compound ([Fe(TPA)Cl2]) has been structurally characterized twice [9, 10], and the general pattern of distances and angles are observed—the Fe-Cl trans to the tertiary amine is shorter as are the mutually trans Fe-pyridyl distances, and the Npy-Fe-Npy angle is significantly less than 180°. What is remarkable is that all of the iron-ligand distances are significantly shorter in 1 compared to the corresponding distances in the Fe(II) compounds. For example the mutually trans Fe-pyridyl distances of 1 (2.132 Å) as compared to the Fe(II) compounds (2.190 Å), or the shorter iron-Cl distance (2.2425 Å vs 2.339 Å). Of course, as mentioned in various inorganic chemistry textbooks, the effective radius for Fe(II) is typically described as being larger than that for Fe(III) [43]. We will say more about this below.
The structures of 2, 3 and 4 are naturally all similar consisting of an oxido-bridged diiron(III) core; the asymmetric unit of 2 is shown in Fig. 2, Fig. 3 shows dimeric 2, the asymmetric unit of 3 is shown in Fig. 4, Fig. 5 shows dimeric 3, and Fig. 6 shows the [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O]2+unit of 4. For both 2 and 3, the oxide sits on an inversion center, while for 4 there is no crystallographically imposed symmetry. Each iron center in all three structures is roughly octahedral with the oxide and chloride cis to one another, the oxide trans to a pyridyl group and the chloride trans to the tertiary amine. The oxido-bridge is essentially linear (174.0(2)°) for 4 and is required to be linear for 2 and 3. The oxide exerts a strong trans influence—these Fe-N distances are the longest in all three structures. The Fe-N3° distances are the next longest, suggesting either a relatively strong trans influence of chloride, or an inherently poor Lewis basicity of this tris-picolyl substituted tertiary amine. One expects a strong bond is needed to produce a strong trans influence and the Fe-Cl distances are significantly longer (2.303 Å) than the corresponding Fe-Cl distance in 1 (2.2425(8)Å) which implies that this isn’t the trans influence of chloride. Indeed, in TPA•3HClO4 the tertiary amine remains deprotonated in the solid state [44] and in solution [45, 46]. Another possible influence on the Fe-N3° distance is the cis influence of the oxido-bridge; that is, the presence of the strong Fe-O bond may cause a lengthening of all of the other distances around the iron center. This is precisely what is observed with the Fe-Npy distances of 2.145 Å for 2,3 and 4 vs 2.132 Å for 1.
The [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O]2+ unit has been reported previously in [Fe(TPA)Cl2]2[{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O](ClO4)4, and in other polymorphs [13,14,15]. In all of the reported structures, the details of the oxido-bridged diiron unit are all very similar. In all but 4, the oxide sits in a special position confirming crystallographic symmetry (twofold symmetry for [14] and inversion symmetry for the others). All of these structures place the chlorides, which are trans to the tertiary amine, in anti positions. The oxido bridge is essentially linear, with very short iron(III)-oxide bonds and long Fe-pyridine bonds trans to the bridge.
The [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O]2+ unit is similar to [{V(TPA)Cl}2O]2+ [2] with the same relative arrangement of atoms (the oxide sits on an inversion center for the V(III) complex). The M-Cl and M-O distances are shorter for the Fe(III) unit, while the M-N distances are longer. While octahedral high spin Fe(III) has a slightly larger effective ionic radius than octahedral V(III) (0.645 Å vs. 0.640 Å, respectively) [43], the average metal ligand bond distance for all of the [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O]2+ units (2.142 Å) is significantly longer than the corresponding [{V(TPA)Cl}2O]2+ unit (2.120 Å). The effective ionic radii values of Shannon are based on coordination primarily by oxygen—strictly oxygen for V (six structures) and mostly oxygen for Fe (seven oxygen structures and one fluorine structure) [43], so one might assume that π donation from the ligands is included in the effective ionic radius. This implies that the longer Fe-N distances are σ effects, reflecting the two σ antibonding electrons in Fe(III) as compared to V(III) which is d2. For the high spin Fe(III), Fe(II) effective ionic radii comparison (0.645 Å vs. 0.780 Å) [43], the Fe(II) value is based on six structures with mostly oxygen donors (one structure has F/OH disorder), which implies that the difference in size is due to two factors: the increase in π antibonding electron count and the difference in charge on the metal center (the greater the charge, the smaller the radius). However, for the [Fe(TPA)Cl2]n+ complexes the average Fe(III) ligand bond distance is 2.196 Å and the average Fe(II) ligand bond distance is 2.283 Å or a difference, on average, of 0.087 Å which is considerably smaller than the difference of 0.135 Å in effective ionic radii.
Data Availability
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10870-020-00872-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
Anderegg G, Wenk F (1967) Helv Chim Acta 50:2330–2332
Tajika Y, Tsuge K, Sasaki Y (2005) Dalton Trans:1438–1447
Robertson NJ, Carney MJ, Halfen JA (2003) Inorg Chem 42:6876–6885
Hodgson DJ, Zietlow MH, Pederson E, Toftlund H (1988) Inorg Chim Acta 149:111–117
Gafford BG, O’Rear C, Zhang JH, O’Connor CJ, Holwerda RA (1988) Inorg Chem 28:1720–1726
Gultneh Y, Farooq A, Karlin KD, Liu S, Zubieta J (1993) Inorg Chim Acta 211:171–175
Towle DK, Botsford CA, Hodgson DJ (1988) Inorg Chim Acta 141:167–168
Kim M, Kim Y-U, Han J (2007) Polyhedron 26:4003–4008
Mandon D, Machkour A, Goetz S, Welter R (2002) Inorg Chem 41:5364–5372
Davies CJ, Solan GA, Fawcett J (2004) Polyhedron 2004:3105–3114
Norman RE, Yan S, Que Jr L, Backes G, Ling L, Sanders-Loehr J, Zhang JH, O’Connor CJ (1990) J Am Chem Soc 112:1554–1562
Norman RE, Holz RC, Ménage S, O’Connor CJ, Zhang JH, Que Jr L (1990) Inorg Chem 29:4629–4637
Kojima T, Leising RA, Yan S, Que Jr L (1993) J Am Chem Soc 115:11328–11335
Hazell A, Jensen KB, McKenzie CJ, Toftlund H (1994) Inorg Chem 33:3127–3134
Seth SK, Mandal PC, Kar T, Mukhopadhyay S (2011) J Mol Struct 994:109–116
Eckenhoff WT, Biernesser AB, Pintauer T (2012) Inorg Chim Acta 382:84–95
Mandel JB, Maricondi C, Douglas BE (1988) Inorg Chem 27:2990–2996
Tong B, Norman RE, Chang S-C (1999) Acta Crystallogr Sect C Cryst Struct Commun C55:1236–1238
Tong B, Chang S-C, Carpenter EE, O’Connor CJ, Lay Jr JO, Norman RE (2000) Inorg Chim Acta 300-302:855–861
Jacobson RR, Tyeklár Z, Farooq A, Karlin KD, Zubieta J (1988) J Am Chem Soc 110:3690–3692
Tyeklár Z, Jacobson RR, Wei N, Murthy NN, Zubieta J, Karlin KD (1993) J Am Chem Soc 115:2677–2689
Oshio H, Ichida H (1995) J Phys Chem 99:3294–3302
Nobutoshi K, Hirotaka N, Yoshinori K, Gin-ya A, Masatatsu S, Akira U, Koji T (1995) Bull Chem Soc Jpn 68:581–589
Murthy NN, Karlin KD (1993) J Chem Soc Chem Commun:1236–1238
Adams H, Bailey NA, Fenton DE, He Q-Y (1995) J Chem Soc. Dalton Trans:697–699
Kal S, Xu S, Que Jr L (2020) Angew Chem Int Ed 59:7332–7349
Puri M, Que Jr L (2015) Acc Chem Res 48:2443–2452
He C, Mishina Y (2004) Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:201–208
Xue J (1996) M. S. Thesis, Duquesne University
Xie M (2000) M. S. Thesis, University of Louisiana at Monroe
Gunatilleke SS (2003) M. S. Thesis, University of Louisiana at Monroe
Jayaratna NB (2010) M. S. Thesis, Sam Houston State University
Gafford BG, Holwerda RA (1989) Inorg Chem 28:60–66
Otwinowski Z, Minor W (1997) Methods Enzymol 276:307–326
Altomare A, Cascarano G, Giacovazzo C, Guagliardi A (1993) J Appl Crystallogr 27:343–350
Beurskens PT, Admiraal G, Beurskens G, Bosman WP, De Gelder R, Isreal R, Smith JMM (1994) Technical report of the crystallography laboratory. University of Nijmegen, Netherlands
TeXsan for Windows: Crystal Structure Analysis Package (1997) Molecular Structure Corporation, The Woodlands, TX
Cromer DT, Waber JT (1974) International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Kynoch: Birmingham, IV: Table 2.2 A
Ibers JA, Hamilton WC (1964) Acta Crystallogr 17:781–782
Creagh DC, McAuley WJ (1992) In: Wilson AJC (ed) International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Kluwer: Boston, C: 219–222
Creagh DC, Hubbell JH (1992) In: Wilson AJC (ed) International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Kluwer: Boston, C: 200–206
Sheldrick GM (1997) SHELXL97, program for the refinement of crystal structures. University of Göttingen, Germany
Shannon RD (1976) Acta Crystallogr Sect A Cryst Phys Diffr Theor Gen Crystallogr A32:751–767
Britton D, Norman RE, Que Jr L (1991) Acta Crystallogr Sect C Cryst Struct Commun C47:2415–2417
Anderegg G, Hubmann E, Podder NG, Wenk F (1977) Helv Chim Acta 60:123–140
Anderegg G, Popov K, Pregosin PS (1986) Helv Chim Acta 69:329–332
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Shih-Chi Chang, Scott Lovell, and Frank Fronczek for their assistance and expertise with X-ray data collection, and we thank Sajini Randeniya for synthetic contributions. Financial support of the Louisiana Board of Regents Support Fund and the Welch Foundation (x-0011) is gratefully acknowledged.
Funding
the Louisiana Board of Regents Support Fund and the Welch Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xue, J., Xie, M., Nadir, S. et al. Synthesis and Structure of [Fe(TPA)Cl2](ClO4) and [{Fe(TPA)Cl}2O](ClO4)2 Where TPA = Tris-(2-pyridylmethyl)amine. J Chem Crystallogr 51, 483–490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10870-020-00872-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10870-020-00872-z