Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Dysfunctional Interpersonal Tendencies, Derailment Potential Behavior, and Turnover

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Managerial derailment, which includes failure in the form organizational exit, poses costly consequences for organizations. We investigated the relationship between dysfunctional interpersonal tendencies, derailment potential behaviors, and actual managerial derailment in the form of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Data were from an archival database of high-level managers working for a global retail organization, including self-report interpersonal tendencies, 360-degree feedback data, and personnel history (N = 1,796). Managers who exhibit the dysfunctional interpersonal tendencies associated with “moving against people” were more likely to enact derailment potential behaviors. As a result, these managers were more likely to be fired or quit. This study advances our understanding of the managerial derailment process by providing evidence of the positive relationship between derailment potential behaviors and both voluntary and involuntary turnover as well as the potential for “moving against” people to result in derailment. Our results may help to inform the selection, promotion, and training strategies employed by practitioners and potentially reduce the costs associated with losing high-potential executives. This is one of the first studies to provide evidence of the relationship between derailment potential behaviors and turnover, and in a rarely obtained sample of high-level managers. Additionally, derailment potential ratings were collected before managers’ exit from the organization, thus helping to overcome retrospective bias evident in prior studies; managers who ultimately derail were perceived as having exhibited behaviors consistent with the potential to derail before organizational exit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Given the large sample size in our study, we used the more conservative Sobel test as opposed to bootstrapping (e.g., Preacher and Hayes 2004). Bootstrapping is recommended as an alternative to the Sobel test for samples under N = 400 to help overcome potential violations of the assumption of multivariate normality for the indirect effect (Shrout and Bolger 2002).

  2. Griffeth et al. (2000) found a weighted mean correlation of −.14 between performance and turnover in their meta-analysis of 14 studies (N = 8,288), suggesting that low performers are more likely to quit than high performers. The effect size and direction of this finding are consistent with present correlations between derailment behaviors (i.e., poor performance) and both voluntary (r = .09) and involuntary (r = .19) turnover.

References

  • Austin, J. F., & Murray, J. M. (1993). Personality characteristics and profiles of employed and outplaced executives using the 16PF. Journal of Business and Psychology, 8, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. J., & Campbell, J. P. (2007). To be, or not to be, linear: An expanded representation of personality and its relationship to leadership performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 232–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T. D. (2003). Sin, pride, and self-acceptance: The problem of identity in theology and psychology. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., Hogan, J., Foster, J., & Elizondo, F. (2005, April). Recombinant personality measures for predicting leadership competence. Paper presented at the 20th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, California.

  • Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behavior: A definition and conceptual model. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. (2004). Why smart executives fail. New York: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., & Hogan, J. (2006, May). Profile analyses of personalityleadership performance relations. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.

  • Fox, G. (2001). Review of the hogan development survey. Mental measurements yearbook (14th ed.). Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2006). Personality disorder and intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2007). Personality disorders and derailment at work: The paradoxical positive influence of pathology in the workplace. In J. Langan-Fox, C. L. Cooper, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2008). Psychometric correlates of FIRO-B scores: Locating the FIRO-B in personality factor space. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2005). Personality traits, types, and disorders: An examination of the relationship between three self-report measures. European Journal of Personality, 19, 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, W. A., & Shanock, L. R. (2008). Views of managerial derailment from above and below: The importance of a good relationship with upper management and putting people at ease. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1269–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, W. A., Mondore, S. P., & Cox, B. D. (2007). A study of managerial derailment characteristics and personality preferences. Journal of Management Development, 9, 857–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, W. A., Braddy, P. B., Weber, T. J., Thompson, L. F., & LeBreton, J. (2009, April). Investigating managerial performance: A relative weights analysis of derailment behaviors. Poster session presented at the Society of Industrial Organizational Psychology Conference, New Orleans, LA.

  • Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. E., & Cameron, J. E. (2005). Multiple dimensions of organizational identification and commitment as predictors of turnover intentions and psychological well-being. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 37(3), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1997). Hogan development survey. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Hogan Assessment Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Warrenfeltz, R. (2007). The Hogan guide: Interpretation and use of Hogan inventories. Jacksonville, FL: Hogan Assessment Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1945). Our inner conflicts: A constructive theory of neurosis. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosek, S. D., Tiemeyer, P., Kilburn, R., Strong, D. A., Ducksworth, S., & Ray, R. (2001). Minority and gender differences in officer career progression. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, B. E. (1986). The derailment of fast-track managers. Organizational Dynamics, 15, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, J. B., & Van Velsor, E. (1996). A look at derailment today: North America and Europe. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (1989). Preventing derailment: What to do before it’s too late. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, M. M., & McCauley, C. D. (1988). The dynamics of management derailment (Tech. Rep. No. 34). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

  • Lombardo, M. M., Ruderman, M. N., & McCauley, C. D. (1988). Explanations of success and derailment in upper-level management positions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D. J., & Reckers, P. M. J. (2001). The influence of gender, ethnicity, and individual differences on perceptions of career progression in public accounting. International Journal of Auditing, 5, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maertz, C. P., & Griffeth, R. W. (2004). Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with research implications. Journal of Management, 30, 667–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. W., & Lombardo, M. M. (1983). What makes a top executive? Psychology Today, 17(2), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartney, W. W., & Campbell, C. R. (2006). Leadership, management and derailment: A model of individual success and failure. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, G. M., & Cascio, W. F. (1987). Do good or poor performers leave? A meta-analysis of the relationship between performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 744–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., White, R., & Van Velsor, E. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America’s largest corporations?. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, T. V., Campion, M. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). The leadership skills strataplex: Leadership skill requirements across organizational levels. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipper, F., & Dillard, J. E., Jr. (2000). A study of impending derailment and recovery of middle managers across career stages. Human Resource Management, 39, 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. L., & Watkins, W. E. (1978). Managing manpower turnover costs. Personnel Administrator, 23(4), 46–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, T. A. (1997). A closer look at the personality characteristics of outplaced executives. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., Millsap, R. E., & Peters, P. A. (1994). An exploratory examination of person–organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, S. J. (2005). Diving in. HR Magazine, 50, 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marisa Adelman Carson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carson, M.A., Shanock, L.R., Heggestad, E.D. et al. The Relationship Between Dysfunctional Interpersonal Tendencies, Derailment Potential Behavior, and Turnover. J Bus Psychol 27, 291–304 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9239-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9239-0

Keywords

Navigation