Skip to main content
Log in

Explanations of success and derailment in upper-level management positions

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using an inventory based on findings from several qualitative studies, this investigation developed eight dimensions distinguishing successful senior managers from those who had derailed. Results showed that bosses' ratings of 86 successful senior managers on the eight dimensions were significantly higher than those of 83 who had derailed, providing empirical support for many of the earlier qualitative findings. Comparing the successful managers to the derailed suggests dimensions otherwise overlooked which are important to consider when assessing managerial talent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentz, V. J. (1967). The Sears experience in the investigation, description and prediction of executive behavior. In F. R. Wickert & D. E. McFarland (Eds.),Measuring executive effectiveness (pp. 147–206). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentz, V. J. (1985a). Research findings from personality assessment of executives. In J. H. Bernardin, & D. A. Bownas (Eds.),Personality assessment in organizations (pp. 82–144). New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentz, V. J. (1985b).A view of the top: A thirty year perspective of research devoted to the discovery, description and prediction of executive behavior. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1982).The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D. W., & Howard, A. (1983). The AT&T longitudinal studies of managers. In K. W. Shaie (Ed.),Longitudinal studies of adult psychological development. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D. W., Campbell, R. J., & Grant, D. L. (1974).Formative years in business. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., III, & Weick, K. E., Jr. (1970).Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnette, M. D. (1967). Predictors of executive success. In F. R. Wickert & D. E. McFarland (Eds.),Measuring executive effectiveness. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabarro, J. J. (1985). Taking charge: Stages in management succession.Harvard Business Review, 64(3), 110–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabarro, J. J. (1987).The dynamics of taking charge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, A. S., Hahn, C. P., Fleishman, E. A., & Baxter, B. (1968).Top management development and succession. New York: Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. (1984).The relationship of sample size to the stability of component patterns: A simulation study. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rhode Island, Department of Psychology, Kingston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J. K. (1969). Job descriptions for executives.Harvard Business Review, 37(5), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A., & Bray, D. W. (1986, May).Career flights of executives and lesser birds. Paper presented at the 14th International Congress on the Assessment Center Method, Dearborn, MI.

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation Little Jiffy.Psychometrika, 32, 363–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1982).The general managers. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, E. T., Homes, V. B., & McCall, M. W. (In press).Key events in executives' lives. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

  • Lombardo, M. M. (1985).Executive inventory. Greensboro, NC: Center for Oreative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. W., & Lombardo, M. M. (1983). What makes a top executive?Psychology Today, 17(2), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. W., Lombardo, M. M., & Morrison, A. M. (1988). Lexington Mass: Lexington Books.The lessons of experience. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1985).SAS user's guide: Statistics, version 5 edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, W., & Sasser, E. (1978).Manufacturing in the corporate strategy. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1974).Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, J. A. F., Ference, T. P., Warren, E. K., & Christensen, H. K. (1980).Managerial career plateaus. New York: Center for Research in Career Development, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, G. C., & Byham, W. C. (1982).Assessment centers and managerial performance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornow, W. W., & Pinto, P. R. (1976). The development of a managerial job taxonomy: A system for describing, classifying, and evaluating executive positions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 410–418.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lombardo, M.M., Ruderman, M.N. & McCauley, C.D. Explanations of success and derailment in upper-level management positions. J Bus Psychol 2, 199–216 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014038

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014038

Keywords

Navigation