Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stretchable collagen-coated polyurethane-urea hydrogel seeded with bladder smooth muscle cells for urethral defect repair in a rabbit model

  • Special Issue: CESB 2019
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The major challenge to treat the clinical adverse effects of long-segment urethra is in achieving viable tissue substitution. The substituted construct’s properties-such as its resilience, contraction, and ability to minimize scar-stenosis formation should be considered. In the present work, a unique polyurethane-urea (PUU) fibrous membrane is fabricated by electrospinning. Then PUU was coated by collagen and formed the elasticity hydrogel after immersed in collagen solution. Meanwhile, the cPUU hydrogel exhibited a fibrous microstructure. This cPUU hydrogel had outstanding stretching property with 404 ± 40% elongation at break compared with traditional hydrogels, which satisfied the requirement of urethra. The cPUU hydrogel also supported the adhesion and growth of bladder smooth-muscle cells (BSMCs) in natural state cell morphology. Urethral defects in New Zealand male rabbits were repaired with cPUU seeded with BSMCs in vivo. After three months, more smooth-surface area of reconstructed urethral tissues was observed in the cPUU hydrogel-BMSCs groups compared with that of the control group. The luminal patency and the incidence of complications-including calculus formation, urinary fistula, and urethral-stricture occurrence were significantly lower in the cPUU group compared with that of the control group. Hence, cPUU fibrous hydrogels are promising scaffolds for application in urological tissue engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu YM, Qiao Y, Sa YL, Zhang J, Fu Q, Song LJ. Urethral reconstruction using colonic mucosa graft for complex strictures. J Urol. 2009;182:1040–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbagli G, Kulkarni SB, Fossati N, Larcher A, Sansalone S, Guazzoni G, et al. Long-term followup and deterioration rate of anterior substitution urethroplasty. J Urol. 2014;192:808–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapple C, Andrich D, Atala A, Barbagli G, Cavalcanti A, Kulkarni S, et al. SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: The management of anterior urethral stricture disease using substitution urethroplasty. Urology. 2014;83:S31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fossati N, Barbagli G, Larcher A, Dell'Oglio P, Sansalone S, Lughezzani G, et al. The surgical learning curve for one-stage anterior urethroplasty: a prospective single-surgeon study. Eur Urol. 2016;69:686–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science. 2001;294:1708–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Debnath J, Mills KR, Collins NL, Reginato MJ, Muthuswamy SK, Brugge JS. The role of apoptosis in creating and maintaining luminal space within normal and oncogene-expressing mammary acini. Cell. 2002;111:29–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Farhat WA, Yeger H. Does mechanical stimulation have any role in urinary bladder tissue engineering? World J Urol. 2008;26:301–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beiko DT, Knudsen BE, Watterson JD, Cadieux PA, Reid G, Denstedt JD. Urinary tract biomaterials. J Urol. 2004;171:2438–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin HK, Madihally SV, Palmer B, Frimberger D, Fung KM, Kropp BP. Biomatrices for bladder reconstruction. Adv drug Deliv Rev. 2015;82-83:47–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Song L, Murphy SV, Yang B, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Atala A. Bladder acellular matrix and its application in bladder augmentation. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2014;20:163–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu MS, Maan ZN, Wu JC, Rennert RC, Hong WX, Lai TS, et al. Tissue engineering and regenerative repair in wound healing. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42:1494–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cen L, Liu W, Cui L, Zhang W, Cao Y. Collagen tissue engineering: development of novel biomaterials and applications. Pediatr Res. 2008;63:492–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chattopadhyay S, Raines RT. Review collagen-based biomaterials for wound healing. Biopolymers. 2014;101:821–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jia W, Tang H, Wu J, Hou X, Chen B, Chen W, et al. Urethral tissue regeneration using collagen scaffold modified with collagen binding VEGF in a beagle model. Biomaterials. 2015;69:45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rohman G, Pettit JJ, Isaure F, Cameron NR, Southgate J. Influence of the physical properties of two-dimensional polyester substrates on the growth of normal human urothelial and urinary smooth muscle cells in vitro. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2264–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cui Y, Tan M, Zhu A, Guo M. Non-covalent interaction cooperatively induced stretchy, tough and stimuli-responsive polyurethane-urea supramolecular (PUUS) hydrogels. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:2834–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Sherbiny IM, Yacoub MH. Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: progress and challenges. Glob Cardiol Sci Pr. 2013;2013:316–42.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stier S, Rebers L, Schönhaar V, Hoch E, Borchers K. Advanced formulation of methacryl- and acetyl-modified biomolecules to achieve independent control of swelling and stiffness in printable hydrogels. J Mater Sci. 2019;30:35.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jun I, Han H-S, Edwards R, Jeon H. Electrospun fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering: viewpoints on architecture and fabrication. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo T, Yang X, Deng J, Zhu L, Wang B, Hao S. Keratin nanoparticles-coating electrospun PVA nanofibers for potential neural tissue applications. J Mater Sci. 2018;30:9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lv X, Guo Q, Han F, Chen C, Ling C, Chen W, et al. Electrospun poly(l-lactide)/poly(ethylene glycol) scaffolds seeded with human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells for urethral epithelium repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jia L, Han F, Wang H, Zhu C, Guo Q, Li J, et al. Polydopamine-assisted surface modification for orthopaedic implants. J Orthop Translation. 2019;17:82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang B-Y, Deng G-Y, Zhao R-Z, Dai C-Y, Jiang C-Y, Wang X-J, et al. Porous Se@SiO2 nanosphere-coated catheter accelerates prostatic urethra wound healing by modulating macrophage polarization through reactive oxygen species-NF-κB pathway inhibition. Acta Biomaterialia. 2019;88:392–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shinchi M, Kushibiki T, Mayumi Y, Ito K, Asano T, Ishihara M, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1 sustained-release collagen on urethral catheter prevents stricture after urethral injury in a rabbit model. Int J Urol. 2019;26:572–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mathur R, Aggarwal G, Satsangi B. A retrospective analysis of delayed complications of urethroplasty at a tertiary care centre. Updates Surg. 2011;63:185–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Brien FJ. Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today. 2011;14:88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, Chen X, Chandra P, Mo X, Zhao W. 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: an in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomaterialia. 2017;50:154–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kotch FW, Raines RT. Self-assembly of synthetic collagen triple helices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:3028–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Collagen structure and stability. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:929–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Adamowicz J, Juszczak K, Bajek A, Tworkiewicz J, Nowacki M, Marszalek A, et al. Morphological and urodynamic evaluation of urinary bladder wall regeneration: muscles guarantee contraction but not proper function - a rat model research study. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:1429–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. O'Brien CM, Holmes B, Faucett S, Zhang LG. Three-dimensional printing of nanomaterial scaffolds for complex tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2015;21:103–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mousa NA, Abou-Taleb HA, Orabi H. Stem cell applications for pathologies of the urinary bladder. World J Stem Cells. 2015;7:815–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418:41–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shakhssalim N, Soleimani M, Dehghan MM, Rasouli J, Taghizadeh-Jahed M, Torbati PM, et al. Bladder smooth muscle cells on electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/poly(l-lactic acid) scaffold promote bladder regeneration in a canine model. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;75:877–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zakrzewski JL, van den Brink MR, Hubbell JA. Overcoming immunological barriers in regenerative medicine. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:786–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang H, Jia X, Han F, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Fan Y, et al. Dual-delivery of VEGF and PDGF by double-layered electrospun membranes for blood vessel regeneration. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2202–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Drewa T, Adamowicz J, Sharma A. Tissue engineering for the oncologic urinary bladder. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9:561–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Subramaniam R, Hinley J, Stahlschmidt J, Southgate J. Tissue engineering potential of urothelial cells from diseased bladders. J Urol. 2011;186:2014–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC1100203), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672213, 31872748), Jiangsu Provincial Clinical Orthopedic Center, and the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Authors’ contributions

Weiguo Chen, Fengxuan Han and Bin Li conceived and designed the experiments; Professor Mingyu Guo provided the PUU materials; Chunyang Chen and Chengyuan Wang performed the experiments with the help of Fengxuan Han; Chunyang Chen and Chengyuan Wang analyzed the data; Chengyuan Wang and Fengxuan Han wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bin Li, Fengxuan Han or Weiguo Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Chen, C., Guo, M. et al. Stretchable collagen-coated polyurethane-urea hydrogel seeded with bladder smooth muscle cells for urethral defect repair in a rabbit model. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 30, 135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6342-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6342-7

Navigation