Abstract
There has recently been a great deal of interest in employing immiscible solutes to stabilize nanocrystalline microstructures. Existing modeling efforts largely rely on mesoscale Monte Carlo approaches that employ a simplified model of the microstructure and result in highly homogeneous segregation to grain boundaries. However, there is ample evidence from experimental and modeling studies that demonstrates segregation to grain boundaries is highly non-uniform and sensitive to boundary character. This work employs a realistic nanocrystalline microstructure with experimentally relevant global solute concentrations to illustrate inhomogeneous boundary segregation. Experiments quantifying segregation in thin films are reported that corroborate the prediction that grain boundary segregation is highly inhomogeneous. In addition to grain boundary structure modifying the degree of segregation, the existence of a phase transformation between low and high solute content grain boundaries is predicted. In order to conduct this study, new embedded atom method interatomic potentials are developed for Pt, Au, and the PtAu binary alloy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gleiter H (1989) Nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 33:223–315
Chookajorn T, Schuh CA (2014) Nanoscale segregation behavior and high-temperature stability of nanocrystalline W-20at.% Ti. Acta Mater 73:128–138. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.039
Chookajorn T, Park M, Schuh CA (2015) Duplex nanocrystalline alloy: entropic nanostructure stabilization and a case study on W–Cr. J Mater Res 30:151–163. doi:10.1557/jmr.2014.385
Hornbuckle BC, Rojhirunsakool T, Rajagopalan M, Alam T, Purja Pun GP, Banerjee R, Solanki KN, Mishin Y, Kecskes LJ, Darling KA (2015) Effect of Ta solute concentration on the microstructural evolution in immiscible Cu–Ta alloys. JOM 67(12):2802–2809. doi:10.1007/s11837-015-1643-x
Kurz S, Leineweber A, Mittemeijer E (2014) Anomalously high density and thermal stability of nanotwins in Ni(W) thin films: quantitative analysis by X-ray diffraction. J Mater Res 29(15):1642–1655. doi:10.1557/jmr.2014.202
Khalajhedayati A, Rupert TJ (2015) High-temperature stability and grain boundary complexion formation in a nanocrystalline Cu–Zr alloy. JOM 67(12):2788–2801. doi:10.1007/s11837-015-1644-9
Darling K, VanLeeuwen B, Koch C, Scattergood R (2010) Thermal stability of nanocrystalline Fe–Zr alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 527(15):3572–3580. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.043
Darling KA, Chan RN, Wong PZ, Semones JE, Scattergood RO, Koch CC (2008) Grain-size stabilization in nanocrystalline FeZr alloys. Scr Mater 59(5):530–533. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.045
Millett PC, Selvam RP, Saxena A (2006) Molecular dynamics simulations of grain size stabilization in nanocrystalline materials by addition of dopants. Acta Mater 54(2):297–303. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.024
Weissmüller J (1993) Alloy effects in nanostructures. Nanostruct Mater 3(2):261–272. doi:10.1016/0965-9773(93)90088-S
Koch CC, Scattergood RO, Saber M, Kotan H (2013) High temperature stabilization of nanocrystalline grain size: thermodynamic versus kinetic strategies. J Mater Res 28(13):1785–1791. doi:10.1557/jmr.2012.429
Kalidindi AR, Chookajorn T, Schuh CA (2015) Nanocrystalline materials at equilibrium: a thermodynamic review. JOM 67(12):2834–2843. doi:10.1007/s11837-015-1636-9
Andrievski RA (2014) Review of thermal stability of nanomaterials. J Mater Sci 49(4):1449–1460. doi:10.1007/s10853-013-7836-1
Trelewicz JR, Schuh CA (2009) Grain boundary segregation and thermodynamically stable binary nanocrystalline alloys. Phys Rev B 79(9):094112. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094112
Murdoch HA, Schuh CA (2013) Estimation of grain boundary segregation enthalpy and its role in stable nanocrystalline alloy design. J Mater Res 28(16):2154–2163. doi:10.1557/jmr.2013.211
Darling K, Tschopp M, VanLeeuwen B, Atwater M, Liu Z (2014) Mitigating grain growth in binary nanocrystalline alloys through solute selection based on thermodynamic stability maps. Comput Mater Sci 84:255–266. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.10.018
Kalidindi AR, Schuh CA (2017) Phase transitions in stable nanocrystalline alloys. J Mater Res 32(11):1993–2002. doi:10.1557/jmr.2017.188
Phillpot SR, Wolf D, Gleiter H (1995) A structural model for grain boundaries in nanocrystalline materials. Scr Metall Mater 33(8):1245–1251. doi:10.1016/0956-716X(95)00350-5
Cantwell PR, Tang M, Dillon SJ, Luo J, Rohrer GS, Harmer MP (2013) Grain boundary complexions. Acta Mater 62(152):1–48. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.037
Han J, Vitek V, Srolovitz DJ (2016) Grain-boundary metastability and its statistical properties. Acta Mater 104:259–273. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.035
Homer ER, Holm EA, Foiles SM, Olmsted DL (2014) Trends in grain boundary mobility: survey of motion mechanisms. JOM 66(1):114–120. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0801-2
Olmsted DL, Foiles SM, Holm EA (2009) Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals: I. Grain boundary energy. Acta Mater 57(13):3694–3703. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.007
Ratanaphan S, Olmsted DL, Bulatov VV, Holm EA, Rollett AD, Rohrer GS (2015) Grain boundary energies in body-centered cubic metals. Acta Mater 88:346–354. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.069
Olmsted DL, Holm EA, Foiles SM (2009) Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals—II: grain boundary mobility. Acta Mater 57(13):3704–3713. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.015
Barr CM, Vetterick GA, Unocic KA, Hattar K, Bai XM, Taheri ML (2014) Anisotropic radiation-induced segregation in 316L austenitic stainless steel with grain boundary character. Acta Mater 67:145–155. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.060
Barr CM, Barnard L, Nathaniel JE, Hattar K, Unocic KA, Szlurfarska I, Morgan D, Taheri ML (2015) Grain boundary character dependence of radiation-induced segregation in a model Ni–Cr alloy. J Mater Res 30(09):1290–1299. doi:10.1557/jmr.2015.34
Diercks DR, Tong J, Zhu H, Kee R, Baure G, Nino JC, O’Hayre R, Gorman BP (2016) Three-dimensional quantification of composition and electrostatic potential at individual grain boundaries in doped ceria. J Mater Chem A 4(14):5167–5175. doi:10.1039/C5TA10064J
Herbig M, Raabe D, Li YJ, Choi P, Zaefferer S, Goto S (2014) Atomic-scale quantification of grain boundary segregation in nanocrystalline material. Phys Rev Lett 112(12):126103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.126103
Yao L, Ringer S, Cairney J, Miller M (2013) The anatomy of grain boundaries: their structure and atomic-level solute distribution. Scr Mater 69(8):622–625. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.07.013
Sickafus K, Sass S (1987) Grain boundary structural transformations induced by solute segregation. Acta Metall 35(1):69–79. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(87)90214-8
Wynblatt P, Chatain D (2008) Solid-state wetting transitions at grain boundaries. Mater Sci Eng A 495(1–2):119–125. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.091
Wynblatt P, Liu Y (1992) Two-dimensional phase transitions associated with surface miscibility gaps. J Vac Sci Technol A: Vac Surf Films 10(4):2709–2717. doi:10.1116/1.577963
Cheng WC, Wynblatt P (1997) Equilibrium form of PbBiNi alloy crystals. J Cryst Growth 173(3–4):513–527. doi:10.1016/S0022-0248(96)01049-4
Abdeljawad F, Lu P, Argibay N, Clark BG, Boyce BL, Foiles SM (2017) Grain boundary segregation in immiscible nanocrystalline alloys. Acta Mater 126:528–539. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.036
Bishop CM, Cannon RM, Carter WC (2005) A diffuse interface model of interfaces: grain boundaries in silicon nitride. Acta Mater 53(18):4755–4764. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.008
Tang M, Carter WC, Cannon RM (2006) Grain boundary transitions in binary alloys. Phys Rev Lett 97(7):075502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.075502
Clark BG, Hattar K, Marshall MT, Chookajorn T, Boyce BL, Schuh CA (2016) Thermal stability comparison of nanocrystalline Fe-based binary alloy pairs. JOM 68(6):1625–1633. doi:10.1007/s11837-016-1868-3
Foiles S, Baskes M, Daw M (1986) Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys Rev B 33(12):7983–7991. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983
Foiles S, Baskes M, Daw M (1988) Erratum: embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys Rev B 37(17):10378–10378. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.37.10378
Ercolessi F, Adams JB (1994) Interatomic potentials from first-principles calculations: the force-matching method. Europhys Lett 26(8):583. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 (9306054)
Foiles SM (1985) Calculation of the surface segregation of Ni–Cu alloys with the use of the embedded-atom method. Phys Rev B 32(12):7685–7693. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.32.7685
Seki A, Seidman D, Oh Y, Foiles S (1991) Monte Carlo simulations of segregation at [001] twist boundaries in a Pt(Au) alloy—I. Results. Acta Metall Mater 39(12):3167–3177. doi:10.1016/0956-7151(91)90051-2
Seki A, Seidman D, Oh Y, Foiles S (1991) Monte Carlo simulations of segregation at [001] twist boundaries in a Pt(Au) alloy—II. Discussion. Acta Metall Mater 39(12):3179–3185. doi:10.1016/0956-7151(91)90052-3
Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117(1):1–19. doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039
Sadigh B, Erhart P, Stukowski A, Caro A, Martinez E, Zepeda-Ruiz L (2012) Scalable parallel Monte Carlo algorithm for atomistic simulations of precipitation in alloys. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 85(18):184203. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.184203 (1012.5082)
Gruber J, Lim H, Abdeljawad F, Foiles S, Tucker GJ (2017) Development of physically based atomistic microstructures: the effect on the mechanical response of polycrystals. Comput Mater Sci 128:29–36. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.07.011
Cahn JW (1977) Thermodynamics of solid and fluid surfaces. In: Johnson WC, Blakely JM (eds) Interfacial segregation. American Society of Metals, Metals Park, pp 193–228
Hattar K, Bufford D, Buller D (2014) Concurrent in situ ion irradiation transmission electron microscope. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B: Beam Interact Mater Atoms 338:56–65. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2014.08.002
Argibay N, Brumbach MT, Dugger MT, Kotula PG (2013) Grain boundary diffusivity of Ni in Au thin films and the associated degradation in electrical contact resistance due to surface oxide film formation. J Appl Phys 113(11):114906. doi:10.1063/1.4795768
Williams DB, Carter CB (2009) Transmission electron microscopy, 2nd edn. Springer, Boston. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-76501-3
Faken D, Jónsson H (1994) Systematic analysis of local atomic structure combined with 3D computer graphics. Comput Mater Sci 2(2):279–286. doi:10.1016/0927-0256(94)90109-0
Tsuzuki H, Branicio PS, Rino JP (2007) Structural characterization of deformed crystals by analysis of common atomic neighborhood. Comput Phys Commun 177(6):518–523. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2007.05.018
Kelchner CL, Plimpton SJ, Hamilton JC (1998) Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys Rev B 58(17):11085–11088. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085
Mendelev MI, Deng C, Schuh CA, Srolovitz DJ (2013) Comparison of molecular dynamics simulation methods for the study of grain boundary migration. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 21(4):045017. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/21/4/045017
Hart EW (1968) Two-dimensional phase transformation in grain boundaries. Scr Metall 2(3):179–182. doi:10.1016/0036-9748(68)90222-6
Holm EA, Foiles SM (2010) How grain growth stops: a mechanism for grain-growth stagnation in pure materials. Science 328(5982):1138–1141. doi:10.1126/science.1187833
O’Brien CJ, Foiles SM (2016) Hydrogen segregation to inclined twin grain boundaries in nickel. Philos Mag 96(26):2808–2828. doi:10.1080/14786435.2016.1217094
Morse PM (1929) Diatomic molecules according to the wave mechanics. II. Vibrational levels. Phys Rev 34(1):57–64. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.34.57
Rose JH, Smith JR, Guinea F, Ferrante J (1984) Universal features of the equation of state of metals. Phys Rev B 29(6):2963–2969. doi:10.1103/Physrevb.29.2963
Adams BM, Dalbey KR, Eldred MS, Gay DM, Swiler LP, Bohnhoff WJ, Eddy JP, Haskell K (2014) DAKOTA, a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis (SAND2014-4633)
Mattsson T, Mattsson A (2002) Calculating the vacancy formation energy in metals: Pt, Pd, and Mo. Phys Rev B 66(21):214110. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.214110
Smith CJ (ed) (1976) Smithells metals reference book, 5th edn. Butterworths, London
Ashcroft NW, Mermin ND (1976) Solid state physics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
Simmons G, Wang H (1971) Single Crystal elastic constants and calculated aggregate properties: a handbook. MIT Press, Cambridge
Murr L (1972) Temperature coefficient of twin-boundary energy: the determination of stacking-fault energy from the coherent twin-boundary energy in pure F.C.C. metals. Scr Metall 6(3):203–208. doi:10.1016/0036-9748(72)90168-8
Balluffi R (1978) Vacancy defect mobilities and binding energies obtained from annealing studies. J Nucl Mater 69–70:240–263. doi:10.1016/0022-3115(78)90247-7
Gallagher PCJ (1970) The influence of alloying, temperature, and related effects on the stacking fault energy. Metall Trans 1(9):2429–2461. doi:10.1007/BF03038370
Skriver HL, Rosengaard NM (1992) Surface energy and work function of elemental metals. Phys Rev B 46(11):7157–7168. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.46.7157
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Ping Lu of Sandia National Laboratories for sharing his expertise with imaging grain boundary segregation in this material system. The work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, under FWP Award #15013170. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc. for the US Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration Under Contract DE-NA0003525.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Pt–Au potential development
Calculation of reference structures
Due to the lack of measured properties for the PtAu alloy, we instead rely on density functional theory to provide forces and energies for ordered and disordered configurations with which the potentials will be parameterized; This strategy is referred to as force matching [40]. In force matching, two databases are generated, one for parameterization and one for validation. The databases consist of a wide variety of configurations that represent a range of conditions at which the potential might be applied. Using the force-matching approach, individual properties are not reproduced, but rather the goal is to fit the interatomic forces and energies of a wide variety of systems. Since the fit must be applicable to grain boundaries that contain disordered regions at the boundary, it is necessary to fit the potentials for disordered solids in addition to crystalline phases. The actual structures do not need to be equilibrium ones, or even thermodynamically stable states as the DFT calculations only provide energies and forces with which to fit the potential.
Single element potentials are fit to a small range of lattice constants about equilibrium for the FCC, BCC, HCP, diamond, and disordered FCC structures. The disordered FCC structures included random displacements up to 0.1 Å. Also included in the database are multiple sample configurations of a liquid state at 2000 K. The fitting database for the alloy potential consists of a variety of structures including configurations of the liquid PtAu alloy at 2000 K, an FCC PtAu alloy with random displacements of up to 0.1 Å, a range of lattice constants for the ordered compounds \(L_12\), \(B_1\), and \(L_20\).
Functional form of the potential
The cutoff function \(\varXi \) is applied to both the density and pair potential and takes the form
The function H is the Heaviside step function switching at the inner cutoff \(r_c\), and the global cutoff for the potential is \(r_{{\mathrm {cut}}}\). The pair and density functions each have their own inner cutoff radius defined as \(r_p\) and \(r_d\), respectively.
The functional form of the pair potential employed is that of Morse [58],
where \(D_e\) and \(a_m\) are fitting parameters, and \(r_0\) is the equilibrium bond distance as determined from DFT calculations. The electron density function is a simple exponential,
where \(\rho _0\) and \(\lambda _0\) are fitting parameters.
The embedding function is derived as done by Foiles [38] starting with the expression for the total energy of the EAM potential
Foiles replaced the total energy function \(E_{{\mathrm {tot}}}\) with the function from the Rose equation of state for metals [59] and solved Eq. 5 for the embedding functional. The Rose equation of state takes the form
where \(E_0\) is the cohesive energy and
The \(a_0\) term is the DFT calculated lattice constant and \(\lambda _{{\mathrm {R}}} = \sqrt{E_0/\left( 9 \varOmega B \right) }\). This term contains the cohesive energy \((E_0)\), bulk modulus (B), and atomic volume \((\varOmega )\), which are obtained from experiments or, in this case, first-principles calculations. With the Rose equation of state incorporated into the potential, the \(\lambda _{{\mathrm {R}}}\) term is guaranteed to be reproduced by the fit.
Procedure for fitting the potential
The actual fitting of the nine parameters was carried out using the Dakota [60] software package developed at Sandia National Laboratories. The optimization utilized the gradient and hessian free Collony pattern search algorithm. After each optimization step, Dakota called LAMMPS [44] that was used to determine the error between the energies and forces calculated with the EAM potential to the reference data. DAKOTA optimized the parameters until the change in the error (root of the sum of squares of the differences) was less than \(1\times 10^{-3}\).
The Rose equation of state is used to constrain the energy versus lattice constant relationship, the \(\lambda _{{\mathrm {R}}}\) term is fixed using the DFT calculated values for each element. Consequently, there is some deviation in the parameters for binding energy \(E_0\), lattice constant \(a_0\), and bulk modulus B, due to the \(\lambda _{{\mathrm {R}}}\) quantity being constrained, rather than the constituent properties being restricted individually.
The maximum electron density is \(50\,\AA ^{-3}\), and the cutoff for the potentials are 5.50 Å for Pt, and 5.75 Å for Au and PtAu. Since the cutoff parameter must be fixed initially in this scheme, a range of values were used and fits were attempted for each.
Results and validation of fits
Plots of the electron densities, embedding functional, and pair potentials obtained by the fitting procedure are provided in Figs. 8, 9 and 10. Validation of the elemental potentials is carried out for a number of cases, many are found in Table 2, in addition to comparisons to independent data of the elemental liquid at 2000 K and the FCC structure with random displacements. Specific geometries of interest are also included such as the intrinsic stacking fault, the \(\varSigma 3 (111)\langle 110 \rangle \) (coherent twin) boundary, self-interstitial, vacancy, and the (111), (100), and (110) surfaces.
The force matching approach relies on the accuracy of the first principles calculations used to obtain forces and energies. However, there are inherent weaknesses in the GGA approach that result in deviation from experiment. For instance, GGA is known to calculate smaller cohesive energies than measured, and larger lattice constants. It is well known that the vacancy formation energy is poorly matched by GGA [61]. Consequently, the vacancy configuration was excluded from the fitting database, but is included in the validation database. Interestingly, the value of the vacancy formation energies calculated by the potential, reported in Table 2, are in general agreement with experimental values.
The validation database for the alloy potential includes independent data for the PtAu liquid and random PtAu FCC alloy. The overall error of the alloy fit to the parameterization database for energies and forces are \(2.1796\times 10^{-2}\) and \(5.3216\times 10^{-1}\), respectively; Compare these error values to those obtained from applying the potential to the validation database of \(9.2593\times 10^{-3}\) and \(7.0764\times 10^{-1}\). After validation of the binary fit, a number of tests were conducted to study the range of applicability of the potential for a number of relevant cases designed to represent grain boundary and surface segregation. The results of these tests are reported in Table 3. Although the absolute errors are rather large for segregation, it was deemed to be acceptable as the sign of the segregation energy and the relative magnitudes are similar. The largest errors present in the table occur for the test of site segregation energies to the \(\varSigma 5\) grain boundary. The large errors in the smallest segregation energies is to be expected as the small energy change makes it more difficult to obtain an accurate measure of the small change in system energy. The preference for surface segregation of Au on to Pt surfaces predicted by the potential is Reassuringly, the bulk site-substitution energies are in excellent agreement. A further test of the behavior of the potential was made by constructing a phase diagram for the alloy as illustrated in Fig. 11. The solubility values are in very good agreement with experimental phase diagrams reported in the literature.
Coefficients of fits to analytical functions
The coefficients of the parameters in Eqs. 2–4 need to generate the elemental potentials are found in Table 4, and the parameters need for the Pt–Au pair potential are found in Table 5.
Appendix 2: Polynomial fits to properties of the PtAu potential
The chemical potential difference \(\Delta \mu \) at 775 K between Pt and Au is expressed in terms of the absolute atomic concentration c of Au in Pt at 775 K is given in units of eV as
where \(c \le 0.01\), the solubility limit.
Polynomial fit of the lattice constant a(T) with respect to temperature is reported in Table 6 using the fitting function:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Brien, C.J., Barr, C.M., Price, P.M. et al. Grain boundary phase transformations in PtAu and relevance to thermal stabilization of bulk nanocrystalline metals. J Mater Sci 53, 2911–2927 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1706-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1706-1