Chair: Hugh Calkins, MD, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Section Chairs: Definitions, Mechanisms, and Rationale for AF Ablation: Shih-Ann Chen, MD, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Modifiable Risk Factors for AF and Impact on Ablation: Jonathan M. Kalman, MBBS, PhD, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Indications: Claudio Tondo, MD, PhD, Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Center, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Strategies, Techniques, and Endpoints: Karl Heinz Kuck, MD, PhD, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Technology and Tools: Andrea Natale, MD, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David’s Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA.
Technical Aspects of Ablation to Maximize Safety and Anticoagulation: David E. Haines, MD, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Follow-up Considerations: Francis E. Marchlinski, MD, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Outcomes and Efficacy: Matthew R. Reynolds, MD, MSc, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Complications: D. Wyn Davies, MD, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Training Requirements: Bruce D. Lindsay, MD, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Surgical and Hybrid AF Ablation: James R. Edgerton, MD, The Heart Hospital, Baylor Plano, Plano, TX, USA.
Clinical Trial Design: Atul Verma, MD, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Correspondence: Heart Rhythm Society, 1325 G Street NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20005. E-mail address: clinicaldocs@hrsonline.org.
Document Reviewers: Carina Blomström-Lundqvist, MD, PhD; Angelo A.V. De Paola, MD, PhD; Peter M. Kistler, MBBS, PhD; Gregory Y.H. Lip, MD; Nicholas S. Peters, MD; Cristiano F. Pisani, MD; Antonio Raviele, MD; Eduardo B. Saad, MD, PhD; Kazuhiro Satomi, MD, PhD; Martin K. Stiles, MB ChB, PhD; Stephan Willems, MD, PhD
1 Introduction
During the past three decades, catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) have evolved from investigational procedures to their current role as effective treatment options for patients with AF. Surgical ablation of AF, using either standard, minimally invasive, or hybrid techniques, is available in most major hospitals throughout the world. Catheter ablation of AF is even more widely available, and is now the most commonly performed catheter ablation procedure.
In 2007, an initial Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical AF Ablation was developed as a joint effort of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS) [1]. The 2007 document was also developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC). This Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical AF Ablation was rewritten in 2012 to reflect the many advances in AF ablation that had occurred in the interim [2]. The rate of advancement in the tools, techniques, and outcomes of AF ablation continue to increase as enormous research efforts are focused on the mechanisms, outcomes, and treatment of AF. For this reason, the HRS initiated an effort to rewrite and update this Consensus Statement. Reflecting both the worldwide importance of AF, as well as the worldwide performance of AF ablation, this document is the result of a joint partnership between the HRS, EHRA, ECAS, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Society of Cardiac Stimulation and Electrophysiology (Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología [SOLAECE]). The purpose of this 2017 Consensus Statement is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the field of catheter and surgical ablation of AF and to report the findings of a writing group, convened by these five international societies. The writing group is charged with defining the indications, techniques, and outcomes of AF ablation procedures. Included within this document are recommendations pertinent to the design of clinical trials in the field of AF ablation and the reporting of outcomes, including definitions relevant to this topic.
The writing group is composed of 60 experts representing 11 organizations: HRS, EHRA, ECAS, APHRS, SOLAECE, STS, ACC, American Heart Association (AHA), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS), and Brazilian Society of Cardiac Arrhythmias (Sociedade Brasileira de Arritmias Cardíacas [SOBRAC]). All the members of the writing group, as well as peer reviewers of the document, have provided disclosure statements for all relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. All author and peer reviewer disclosure information is provided in Appendix A Table 14 and Appendix B Table 15.
In writing a consensus document, it is recognized that consensus does not mean that there was complete agreement among all the writing group members. Surveys of the entire writing group were used to identify areas of consensus concerning performance of AF ablation procedures and to develop recommendations concerning the indications for catheter and surgical AF ablation. These recommendations were systematically balloted by the 60 writing group members and were approved by a minimum of 80% of these members. The recommendations were also subject to a 1-month public comment period. Each partnering and collaborating organization then officially reviewed, commented on, edited, and endorsed the final document and recommendations.
The grading system for indication of class of evidence level was adapted based on that used by the ACC and the AHA [3, 4]. It is important to state, however, that this document is not a guideline. The indications for catheter and surgical ablation of AF, as well as recommendations for procedure performance, are presented with a Class and Level of Evidence (LOE) to be consistent with what the reader is familiar with seeing in guideline statements. A Class I recommendation means that the benefits of the AF ablation procedure markedly exceed the risks, and that AF ablation should be performed; a Class IIa recommendation means that the benefits of an AF ablation procedure exceed the risks, and that it is reasonable to perform AF ablation; a Class IIb recommendation means that the benefit of AF ablation is greater or equal to the risks, and that AF ablation may be considered; and a Class III recommendation means that AF ablation is of no proven benefit and is not recommended.
The writing group reviewed and ranked evidence supporting current recommendations with the weight of evidence ranked as Level A if the data were derived from high-quality evidence from more than one randomized clinical trial, meta-analyses of high-quality randomized clinical trials, or one or more randomized clinical trials corroborated by high-quality registry studies. The writing group ranked available evidence as Level B-R when there was moderate-quality evidence from one or more randomized clinical trials, or meta-analyses of moderate-quality randomized clinical trials. Level B-NR was used to denote moderate-quality evidence from one or more well-designed, well-executed nonrandomized studies, observational studies, or registry studies. This designation was also used to denote moderate-quality evidence from meta-analyses of such studies. Evidence was ranked as Level C-LD when the primary source of the recommendation was randomized or nonrandomized observational or registry studies with limitations of design or execution, meta-analyses of such studies, or physiological or mechanistic studies of human subjects. Level C-EO was defined as expert opinion based on the clinical experience of the writing group.
Despite a large number of authors, the participation of several societies and professional organizations, and the attempts of the group to reflect the current knowledge in the field adequately, this document is not intended as a guideline. Rather, the group would like to refer to the current guidelines on AF management for the purpose of guiding overall AF management strategies [5, 6]. This consensus document is specifically focused on catheter and surgical ablation of AF, and summarizes the opinion of the writing group members based on an extensive literature review as well as their own experience. It is directed to all health care professionals who are involved in the care of patients with AF, particularly those who are caring for patients who are undergoing, or are being considered for, catheter or surgical ablation procedures for AF, and those involved in research in the field of AF ablation. This statement is not intended to recommend or promote catheter or surgical ablation of AF. Rather, the ultimate judgment regarding care of a particular patient must be made by the health care provider and the patient in light of all the circumstances presented by that patient.
The main objective of this document is to improve patient care by providing a foundation of knowledge for those involved with catheter ablation of AF. A second major objective is to provide recommendations for designing clinical trials and reporting outcomes of clinical trials of AF ablation. It is recognized that this field continues to evolve rapidly. As this document was being prepared, further clinical trials of catheter and surgical ablation of AF were under way.
2 Definitions, mechanisms, and rationale for AF ablation
This section of the document provides definitions for use in the diagnosis of AF. This section also provides an in-depth review of the mechanisms of AF and rationale for catheter and surgical AF ablation (Table 1, Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6).
Anatomical drawings of the heart relevant to AF ablation. This series of drawings shows the heart and associated relevant structures from four different perspectives relevant to AF ablation. This drawing includes the phrenic nerves and the esophagus. a The heart viewed from the anterior perspective. b The heart viewed from the right lateral perspective. c The heart viewed from the left lateral perspective. d The heart viewed from the posterior perspective. e The left atrium viewed from the posterior perspective. Illustration: Tim Phelps © 2017 Johns Hopkins University, AAM
This figure includes six CT or MR images of the left atrium and pulmonary veins viewed from the posterior perspective. Common and uncommon variations in PV anatomy are shown. a Standard PV anatomy with 4 distinct PV ostia. b Variant PV anatomy with a right common and a left common PV. c Variant PV anatomy with a left common PV with a short trunk and an anomolous PV arising from the right posterior left atrial wall. d and e Variant PV anatomy with a common left PV with a long trunk. f Variant PV anatomy with a massive left common PV
Schematic drawing showing various hypotheses and proposals concerning the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. a Multiple wavelets hypothesis. b Rapidly discharging automatic foci. c Single reentrant circuit with fibrillatory conduction. d Functional reentry resulting from rotors or spiral waves. e AF maintenance resulting from dissociation between epicardial and endocardial layers, with mutual interaction producing multiplying activity that maintains the arrhythmia
Structure and mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. a Schematic drawing of the left and right atria as viewed from the posterior perspective. The extension of muscular fibers onto the PVs can be appreciated. Shown in yellow are the five major left atrial autonomic ganglionic plexi (GP) and axons (superior left GP, inferior left GP, anterior right GP, inferior right GP, and ligament of Marshall). Shown in blue is the coronary sinus, which is enveloped by muscular fibers that have connections to the atria. Also shown in blue is the vein and ligament of Marshall, which travels from the coronary sinus to the region between the left superior PV and the left atrial appendage. b The large and small reentrant wavelets that play a role in initiating and sustaining AF. c The common locations of PV (red) and also the common sites of origin of non-PV triggers (shown in green). d Composite of the anatomic and arrhythmic mechanisms of AF. Adapted with permission from Calkins et al. Heart Rhythm 2012; 9:632–696.e21 [2]
Schematic drawing showing mechanisms of atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. a Isthmus-dependent reverse common (clockwise) atrial flutter. b Isthmus-dependent common (counter clockwise) atrial flutter. c Focal atrial tachycardia with circumferential spread of activation of the atria (can arise from multiple sites within the left and right atrium). d Microreentrant atrial tachycardia with circumferential spread of activation of the atria. e Perimitral atrial flutter. f Roof-dependent atrial flutter
Schematic of common lesion sets employed in AF ablation. a The circumferential ablation lesions that are created in a circumferential fashion around the right and the left PVs. The primary endpoint of this ablation strategy is the electrical isolation of the PV musculature. b Some of the most common sites of linear ablation lesions. These include a “roof line” connecting the lesions encircling the left and/or right PVs, a “mitral isthmus” line connecting the mitral valve and the lesion encircling the left PVs at the end of the left inferior PV, and an anterior linear lesion connecting either the “roof line” or the left or right circumferential lesion to the mitral annulus anteriorly. A linear lesion created at the cavotricuspid isthmus is also shown. This lesion is generally placed in patients who have experienced cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter clinically or have it induced during EP testing. c Similar to 6B, but also shows additional linear ablation lesions between the superior and inferior PVs resulting in a figure of eight lesion sets as well as a posterior inferior line allowing for electrical isolation of the posterior left atrial wall. An encircling lesion of the superior vena cava (SVC) directed at electrical isolation of the SVC is also shown. SVC isolation is performed if focal firing from the SVC can be demonstrated. A subset of operators empirically isolates the SVC. d Representative sites for ablation when targeting rotational activity or CFAEs are targeted. Modified with permission from Calkins et al. Heart Rhythm 2012; 9:632–696.e21 [2]
3 Modifiable risk factors for AF and impact on ablation
Management of patients with AF has traditionally consisted of three main components: (1) anticoagulation for stroke prevention; (2) rate control; and (3) rhythm control. With the emergence of large amounts of data, which have both defined and called attention to the interaction between modifiable risk factors and the development of AF and outcomes of AF management, we believe it is time to include risk factor modification as the fourth pillar of AF management. This section of the document reviews the link between modifiable risk factors and both the development of AF and their impacts on the outcomes of AF ablation.
4 Indications
Shown in Table 2, and summarized in Figs. 7 and 8 of this document, are the Consensus Indications for Catheter and Surgical Ablation of AF. As outlined in the introduction section of this document, these indications are stratified as Class I, Class IIa, Class IIb, and Class III indications. The evidence supporting these indications is provided, as well as a selection of the key references supporting these levels of evidence. In making these recommendations, the writing group considered the body of published literature that has defined the safety and efficacy of catheter and surgical ablation of AF. Also considered in these recommendations is the personal lifetime experience in the field of each of the writing group members. Both the number of clinical trials and the quality of these trials were considered. In considering the class of indications recommended by this writing group, it is important to keep several points in mind. First, these classes of indications only define the indications for catheter and surgical ablation of AF when performed by an electrophysiologist or a surgeon who has received appropriate training and/or who has a certain level of experience and is performing the procedure in an experienced center (Section 11). Catheter and surgical ablation of AF are highly complex procedures, and a careful assessment of the benefit and risk must be considered for each patient. Second, these indications stratify patients based only on the type of AF and whether the procedure is being performed prior to or following a trial of one or more Class I or III antiarrhythmic medications. This document for the first time includes indications for catheter ablation of select asymptomatic patients. As detailed in Section 9, there are many other additional clinical and imaging-based variables that can be used to further define the efficacy and risk of ablation in a given patient. Some of the variables that can be used to define patients in whom a lower success rate or a higher complication rate can be expected include the presence of concomitant heart disease, obesity, sleep apnea, left atrial (LA) size, patient age and frailty, as well as the duration of time the patient has been in continuous AF. Each of these variables needs to be considered when discussing the risks and benefits of AF ablation with a particular patient. In the presence of substantial risk or anticipated difficulty of ablation, it could be more appropriate to use additional antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) options, even if the patient on face value might present with a Class I or IIa indication for ablation. Third, it is important to consider patient preference and values. Some patients are reluctant to consider a major procedure or surgery and have a strong preference for a pharmacological approach. In these patients, trials of antiarrhythmic agents including amiodarone might be preferred to catheter ablation. On the other hand, some patients prefer a nonpharmacological approach. Fourth, it is important to recognize that some patients early in the course of their AF journey might have only infrequent episodes for many years and/or could have AF that is responsive to well-tolerated AAD therapy. And finally, it is important to bear in mind that a decision to perform catheter or surgical AF ablation should only be made after a patient carefully considers the risks, benefits, and alternatives to the procedure.
Indications for catheter ablation of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Shown in this figure are the indications for catheter ablation of symptomatic paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent AF. The Class for each indication based on whether ablation is performed after failure of antiarrhythmic drug therapy or as first-line therapy is shown. Please refer to Table 2B and the text for the indications for catheter ablation of asymptomatic AF
Indications for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Shown in this figure are the indications for surgical ablation of paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent AF. The Class for each indication based on whether ablation is performed after failure of antiarrhythmic drug therapy or as first-line therapy is shown. The indications for surgical AF ablation are divided into whether the AF ablation procedure is performed concomitantly with an open surgical procedure (such as mitral valve replacement), a closed surgical procedure (such as coronary artery bypass graft surgery), or as a stand-alone surgical AF ablation procedure performed solely for treatment of atrial fibrillation
5 Strategies, techniques, and endpoints
The writing group recommendations for techniques to be used for ablation of persistent and long-standing persistent AF (Table 3), adjunctive ablation strategies, nonablative strategies to improve outcomes of AF ablation, and endpoints for ablation of paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent AF are covered in this section. A schematic overview of common lesion sets created during an AF ablation procedure is shown in Fig. 6.
6 Technology and tools
This section of the consensus statement provides an update on many of the technologies and tools that are employed for AF ablation procedures. It is important to recognize that this is not a comprehensive listing and that new technologies, tools, and approaches are being developed. It is also important to recognize that radiofrequency (RF) energy is the dominant energy source available for ablation of typical and atypical atrial flutter (AFL). Although cryoablation is a commonly employed tool for AF ablation, it is not well suited for ablation of typical or atypical AFL. Other energy sources and tools are available in some parts of the world and/or are in various stages of development and/or clinical investigation. Shown in Fig. 9 are schematic drawings of AF ablation using point-by-point RF energy (Fig. 9a) and AF ablation using the cryoballoon (CB) system (Fig. 9b).
Schematic drawing showing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using either RF energy or cryoballoon AF ablation. a Shows a typical wide area lesion set created using RF energy. Ablation lesions are delivered in a figure of eight pattern around the left and right PV veins. Also shown is a linear cavotricuspid isthmus lesion created for ablation of typical atrial flutter in a patient with a prior history of typical atrial flutter or inducible isthmus-dependent typical atrial flutter at the time of ablation. A multielectrode circular mapping catheter is positioned in the left inferior PV. b Shows an ablation procedure using the cryoballoon system. Ablation lesions have been created surrounding the right PVs, and the cryoballoon ablation catheter is positioned in the left superior PV. A through the lumen multielectrode circular mapping catheter is positioned in the left superior PV. Illustration: Tim Phelps © 2017 Johns Hopkins University, AAM
7 Technical aspects of ablation to maximize safety and anticoagulation
Anticoagulation strategies pre-, during, and postcatheter ablation of AF (Table 4); signs and symptoms of complications that can occur within the first several months following ablation (Table 5); anesthesia or sedation during ablation; and approaches to minimize risk of an atrial esophageal fistula are discussed in this section.
8 Follow-up considerations
AF ablation is an invasive procedure that entails risks, most of which are present during the acute procedural period. However, complications can also occur in the weeks or months following ablation. Recognizing common symptoms after AF ablation and distinguishing those that require urgent evaluation and referral to an electrophysiologist is an important part of follow-up after AF ablation. The success of AF ablation is based in large part on freedom from AF recurrence based on ECG monitoring. Arrhythmia monitoring can be performed with the use of noncontinuous or continuous ECG monitoring tools (Table 6). This section also discusses the important topics of AAD and non-AAD use prior to and following AF ablation, the role of cardioversion, as well as the indications for and timing of repeat AF ablation procedures.
9 Outcomes and efficacy
This section provides a comprehensive review of the outcomes of catheter ablation of AF. Table 7 summarizes the main findings of the most important clinical trials in this field. Outcomes of AF ablation in subsets of patients not well represented in these trials are reviewed. Outcomes for specific ablation systems and strategies (CB ablation, rotational activity ablation, and laser balloon ablation) are also reviewed.
10 Complications
Catheter ablation of AF is one of the most complex interventional electrophysiological procedures. AF ablation by its nature involves catheter manipulation and ablation in the delicate thin-walled atria, which are in close proximity to other important organs and structures that can be impacted through collateral damage. It is therefore not surprising that AF ablation is associated with a significant risk of complications, some of which might result in life-long disability and/or death. This section reviews the complications associated with catheter ablation procedures performed to treat AF. The types and incidence of complications are presented, their mechanisms are explored, and the optimal approach to prevention and treatment is discussed (Tables 8 and 9).
11 Training requirements
This section of the document outlines the training requirements for those who wish to perform catheter ablation of AF.
13 Clinical trial design
Although there have been many advances made in the field of catheter and surgical ablation of AF, there is still much to be learned about the mechanisms of initiation and maintenance of AF and how to apply this knowledge to the still-evolving techniques of AF ablation. Although single-center, observational reports have dominated the early days of this field, we are quickly moving into an era in which hypotheses are put through the rigor of testing in well-designed, randomized, multicenter clinical trials. It is as a result of these trials that conventional thinking about the best techniques, success rates, complication rates, and long-term outcomes beyond AF recurrence—such as thromboembolism and mortality—is being put to the test. The ablation literature has also seen a proliferation of meta-analyses and other aggregate analyses, which reinforce the need for consistency in the approach to reporting the results of clinical trials. This section reviews the minimum requirements for reporting on AF ablation trials. It also acknowledges the potential limitations of using specific primary outcomes and emphasizes the need for broad and consistent reporting of secondary outcomes to assist the end-user in determining not only the scientific, but also the clinical relevance of the results (Tables 10, 11, 12, and 13).
13.1 Unanswered questions in AF ablation
There is still much to be learned about the mechanisms of AF, techniques of AF ablation, and long-term outcomes. The following are unanswered questions for future investigation:
-
1
AF ablation and modification of stroke risk and need for ongoing oral anticoagulation (OAC): The CHA2DS2-VASc score was developed for patients with clinical AF. If a patient has received a successful ablation such that he/she no longer has clinical AF (subclinical, or no AF), then what is the need for ongoing OAC? Are there any patients in whom successful ablation could lead to discontinuation of OAC?
-
2
Substrate modification in catheter-based management of AF—particularly for persistent AF: What is the proper lesion set required beyond pulmonary vein isolation? Do lines and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) have any remaining role? Are these approaches ill-advised or simply discouraged?
What is the role of targeting localized rotational activations? How do we ablate a localized rotational activation? How can scar be characterized and targeted for ablation? Do we need to replicate the MAZE procedure? Does the right atrium need to be targeted as well as the left atrium?
-
3
Autonomic influence in AF: Is clinical AF really an autonomic mediated arrhythmia? Is elimination of ganglionated plexi required? Is there a role for autonomic modulation, for example, spinal cord or vagal stimulation?
-
4
Contribution and modulation of risk factors on outcomes of AF ablation: Obesity reduction has been shown to reduce AF burden and recurrence in patients undergoing ablation. What is the role of bariatric surgery? Does the modulation of other risk factors influence outcome such as hypertension, sleep apnea, and diabetes?
-
5
Outcomes in ablation of high-risk populations: Do high-risk populations benefit from AF ablation? Congestive heart failure has been assessed in smaller trials, but larger trials are required. Outcome data are needed in patients with very enlarged LAs, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, patients with renal failure on dialysis, and the very elderly.
-
6
Surgical vs catheter-based vs hybrid ablation: There should be more comparative work between percutaneous and minimally invasive surgical approaches. Both report similar outcomes, but there is a dearth of comparative data. Is there any patient benefit to hybrid procedures?
-
7
How do we characterize patients who are optimal candidates for ablation? Preablation late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might identify patients with heavy burdens of scar who are unlikely to respond to ablation. These techniques must become reproducible and reliable and must be assessed in multicenter trials. Other markers need to be investigated, including genetic markers, biochemical markers, and clinical markers based on aggregated risk scores.
-
8
The incremental role of new technologies: As newer and often more expensive technologies are produced for AF ablation, their definitive incremental value must be determined in order to justify change in practice or case cost. These technologies include global (basket) mapping techniques, newer ablation indices for assessing lesion durability, advanced imaging for viewing lesions in the myocardium, etc. New energy sources, including laser, low-intensity ultrasound, photonic particle therapy, external beam ablation, and MRI-guided ablation, must be assessed in comparative fashion.
-
9
Outcomes of AF ablation: We need to better understand the clinical relevance of ablation outcomes. What is the significance of time to recurrence of 30 s of arrhythmia? How do we best quantify AF burden? How do these outcomes relate to quality of life and stroke risk?
-
10
What is the role of surgical LA reduction? Does left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion or obliteration improve outcome of persistent AF ablation with an accompanying reduction in stroke? Does ablation work through atrial size reduction? What is the incidence of “stiff atrial” syndrome and does this mitigate the clinical impact of ablation?
-
11
Working in teams: What is the role of the entire heart team in AF ablation? Does a team approach achieve better outcomes than a “silo” approach?
-
12
Improving the safety of catheter ablation: As ablation extends to more operators and less experienced operators, the statistical occurrence of complications will increase. We need newer techniques to minimize complications and institute standards for operators to improve the reproducibility of ablation results and safety profiles at a variety of centers worldwide.
-
13
How does catheter ablation affect mortality, stroke, and hospitalization in broad and selected patient populations receiving catheter ablation for AF?
-
14
Management of patients who fail initial attempts at catheter ablation: Should there be specific criteria for repeat ablations (e.g., atrial size, body mass index)? Should patients be referred for surgery for repeat ablation?
In order to address these and other important questions in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, we urge investigators to create and participate in multisite collaborations and electrophysiology research networks with involvement of senior and junior investigators on the steering committees to push forward the next phase of AF research. We also urge funding bodies to support these important initiatives.
14 Conclusion
Catheter ablation of AF is a very commonly performed procedure in hospitals throughout the world. This document provides an up-to-date review of the indications, techniques, and outcomes of catheter and surgical ablation of AF. Areas for which a consensus can be reached concerning AF ablation are identified, and a series of consensus definitions have been developed for use in future clinical trials of AF ablation. Also included within this document are recommendations concerning indications for AF ablation, technical performance of this procedure, and training. It is our hope to improve patient care by providing a foundation for those involved with care of patients with AF as well as those who perform AF ablation. It is recognized that this field continues to evolve rapidly and that this document will need to be updated. Successful AF ablation programs optimally should consist of a cooperative team of cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and surgeons to ensure appropriate indications, procedure selection, and follow-up.
Abbreviations
- AAD:
-
Antiarrhythmic drug
- AF:
-
Atrial fibrillation
- AFL:
-
Atrial flutter
- CB:
-
Cryoballoon
- CFAE:
-
Complex fractionated atrial electrogram
- LA:
-
Left atrial
- LAA:
-
Left atrial appendage
- LGE:
-
Late gadolinium-enhanced
- LOE:
-
Level of evidence
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- OAC:
-
Oral anticoagulation
- RF:
-
Radiofrequency
References
Calkins H, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) task force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(6):816–61.
Calkins H, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(4):632–696.e21.
Jacobs AK, Anderson JL, Halperin JL. The evolution and future of ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines: a 30-year journey: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(13):1373–84.
Anderson JL. Evolution of the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines in perspective: guiding the guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(25):2735–8.
January CT, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):e1–e76.
Kirchhof P, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50(5):e1–e88.
Jais P, et al. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: the A4 study. Circulation. 2008;18(24):2498–505.
Calkins H, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(4):349–61.
Packer DL, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the north American Arctic front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(16):1713–23.
Kuck KH, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235–45.
Dukkipati SR, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon: a prospective, multicenter, and randomized comparison to standard radiofrequency ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(12):1350–60.
Reddy VY, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the safety and effectiveness of a contact force-sensing irrigated catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the TactiCath contact force ablation catheter study for atrial fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) study. Circulation. 2015;132(10):907–15.
Natale A, et al. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(7):647–56.
Wilber DJ, et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303(4):333–40.
Sohara H, et al. HotBalloon ablation of the pulmonary veins for paroxysmal AF: a multicenter randomized trial in Japan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(25):2747–57.
Pappone C, et al. A randomized trial of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the APAF study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(11):2340–7.
Stabile G, et al. Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled study (catheter ablation for the cure of atrial fibrillation study). Eur Heart J. 2006;27(2):216–21.
Forleo GB, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: results from a randomized study comparing pulmonary vein isolation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(1):22–8.
Verma A, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1812–22.
Scherr D, et al. Five-year outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using termination of atrial fibrillation as a procedural endpoint. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(1):18–24.
Tamborero D, et al. Left atrial posterior wall isolation does not improve the outcome of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(1):35–40.
Hummel J, et al. Phased RF ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(2):202–9.
Bassiouny M, et al. Randomized study of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: ablate in sinus rhythm versus ablate complex-fractionated atrial electrograms in atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(2):e003596.
Krittayaphong R, et al. A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation and amiodarone in the treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. J Med Assoc Thail. 2003;86(Suppl 1):S8–S16.
Oral H, et al. Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(9):934–41.
Mont L, et al. Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial (SARA study). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(8):501–7.
Calvo N, et al. Efficacy of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation in endurance athletes. Europace. 2010;12(1):30–6.
Furlanello F, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in athletes referred for disabling symptoms preventing usual training schedule and sport competition. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(5):457–62.
Wazni OM, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005;293(21):2634–40.
Cosedis Nielsen J, et al. Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(17):1587–95.
Morillo CA, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(7):692–700.
Hakalahti A, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2015;17(3):370–8.
Hocini M, et al. Reverse remodeling of sinus node function after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with prolonged sinus pauses. Circulation. 2003;108(10):1172–5.
Chen YW, et al. Pacing or ablation: which is better for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-related tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(4):403–11.
Inada K, et al. The role of successful catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and prolonged sinus pauses: outcome during a 5-year follow-up. Europace. 2014;16(2):208–13.
Chen MS, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with impaired systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(6):1004–9.
Gentlesk PJ, et al. Reversal of left ventricular dysfunction following ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(1):9–14.
Khan MN, et al. Pulmonary-vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in patients with HF. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1778–85.
MacDonald MR, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with advanced heart failure and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2011;97(9):740–7.
Hunter RJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of catheter ablation versus medical treatment of atrial fibrillation in heart failure (the CAMTAF trial). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(1):31–8.
Tondo C, et al. Pulmonary vein vestibule ablation for the control of atrial fibrillation in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29(9):962–70.
Lutomsky BA, et al. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation improves cardiac function: a prospective study on the impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on left ventricular function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Europace. 2008;10(5):593–9.
Choi AD, et al. Ablation vs medical therapy in the setting of symptomatic atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction. Congest Heart Fail. 2010;16(1):10–4.
De Potter T, et al. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction by itself does not influence outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2010;12(1):24–9.
Cha YM, et al. Success of ablation for atrial fibrillation in isolated left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: a comparison to systolic dysfunction and normal ventricular function. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(5):724–32.
Jones DG, et al. A randomized trial to assess catheter ablation versus rate control in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation in HF. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(18):1894–903.
Machino-Ohtsuka T, et al. Efficacy, safety, and outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(20):1857–65.
Al Halabi S, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;1(3):200–9.
Bunch TJ, et al. Five-year outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):363–70.
Lobo TJ, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in systolic dysfunction: clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;104(1):45–52.
Ling LH, et al. Sinus rhythm restores ventricular function in patients with cardiomyopathy and no late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging who undergo catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(9):1334–9.
Hsu LF, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in congestive HF. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(23):2373–83.
Spragg DD, et al. Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: incidence and predictors. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(6):627–31.
Kusumoto F, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in older patients: outcomes and complications. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;25(1):31–5.
Bunch TJ, et al. Long-term clinical efficacy and risk of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in octogenarians. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33(2):146–52.
Santangeli P, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in octogenarians: safety and outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(7):687–93.
Nademanee K, et al. Benefits and risks of catheter ablation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(1):44–51.
Bunch TJ, et al. The impact of age on 5-year outcomes after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(2):141–6.
Metzner I, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients >/=75 years: long-term clinical outcome and safety. Europace. 2016;18(4):543–9.
Bunch TJ, et al. Substrate and procedural predictors of outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(10):1009–14.
Olivotto I, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2001;104(21):2517–24.
Providencia R, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2016;102(19):1533–43.
Leong-Sit P, et al. Efficacy and risk of atrial fibrillation ablation before 45 years of age. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(5):452–7.
Chun KR, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the young: insights from the German ablation registry. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102(6):459–68.
Koopman P, et al. Efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation in athletes with atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2011;13(10):1386–93.
Forleo GB, et al. Clinical impact of catheter ablation in patients with asymptomatic atrial fibrillation: the IRON-AF (Italian registry on NavX atrial fibrillation ablation procedures) study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(4):3968–70.
Wu L, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation between asymptomatic and symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation: a propensity score matched analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(5):531–5.
Mohanty S, et al. Catheter ablation of asymptomatic longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation: impact on quality of life, exercise performance, arrhythmia perception, and arrhythmia-free survival. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(10):1057–64.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration.Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data: AtriCure Synergy Ablation System, PMA P100046. 2011.
Badhwar V, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons mitral repair/replacement composite score: a report of the society of thoracic surgeons quality measurement task force. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(6):2265–71.
Abreu Filho CA, et al. Effectiveness of the maze procedure using cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral valve disease. Circulation. 2005;112(9 Suppl):I20–5.
Doukas G, et al. Left atrial radiofrequency ablation during mitral valve surgery for continuous atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294(18):2323–9.
Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. A randomized double-blind study of epicardial left atrial cryoablation for permanent atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery: the SWEDish multicentre atrial fibrillation study (SWEDMAF). Eur Heart J. 2007;28(23):2902–8.
Chevalier P, et al. Left atrial radiofrequency ablation during mitral valve surgery: a prospective randomized multicentre study (SAFIR). Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;102(11):769–75.
Cheng DC, et al. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Innovations (Phila). 2010;5(2):84–96.
Budera P, et al. Comparison of cardiac surgery with left atrial surgical ablation vs. cardiac surgery without atrial ablation in patients with coronary and/or valvular heart disease plus atrial fibrillation: final results of the PRAGUE-12 randomized multicentre study. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2644–52.
Phan K, et al. Surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a cumulative meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2014;100(9):722–30.
Gillinov AM, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(15):1399–409.
Rankin JS, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons risk model for operative mortality after multiple valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(4):1484–90.
Louagie Y, et al. Improved patient survival with concomitant cox maze III procedure compared with heart surgery alone. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(2):440–6.
Chiappini B, Di Bartolomeo R, Marinelli G. Radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: different approaches. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2004;12(3):272–7.
Barnett SD, Ad N. Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(5):1029–35.
Edgerton JR, Jackman WM, Mack MJ. A new epicardial lesion set for minimal access left atrial maze: the Dallas lesion set. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(5):1655–7.
Edgerton JR, et al. Totally thorascopic surgical ablation of persistent AF and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation using the “Dallas” lesion set. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(12 Suppl):S64–70.
Lockwood D, et al. Linear left atrial lesions in minimally invasive surgical ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: techniques for assessing conduction block across surgical lesions. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(12 Suppl):S50–63.
Malaisrie SC, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012;21(3):350–7.
Cherniavsky A, et al. Assessment of results of surgical treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation during coronary artery bypass grafting using implantable loop recorders. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;18(6):727–31.
Yoo JS, et al. Impact of concomitant surgical atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Circ J. 2014;78(6):1364–71.
Driessen AH, et al. Ganglion plexus ablation in advanced atrial fibrillation: the AFACT study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(11):1155–65.
Boersma LV, et al. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation versus surgical ablation treatment (FAST): a 2-center randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2012;125(1):23–30.
Henn MC, et al. Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(5):1168–76. 1178 e1–2
Krul SP, et al. Navigating the mini-maze: systematic review of the first results and progress of minimally-invasive surgery in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166(1):132–40.
Cox JL, et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101(4):569–83.
Rodriguez E, et al. Minimally invasive bi-atrial CryoMaze operation for atrial fibrillation. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;14(3):208–23.
Wolf RK, et al. Video-assisted bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage exclusion for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(3):797–802.
Edgerton JR, et al. Minimally invasive pulmonary vein isolation and partial autonomic denervation for surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(1):35–8. discussion 39
Edgerton JR, et al. Minimally invasive surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: six-month results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138(1):109–13. discussion 114
Beyer E, Lee R, Lam BK. Point: minimally invasive bipolar radiofrequency ablation of lone atrial fibrillation: early multicenter results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(3):521–6.
Kearney K, et al. A systematic review of surgical ablation versus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;3(1):15–29.
Ad N, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation trends and outcomes in North America. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(5):1051–60.
Driessen AH, et al. Electrophysiologically guided thoracoscopic surgery for advanced atrial fibrillation: 5-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(13):1753–4.
Khargi K, et al. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation; a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(2):258–65.
Wazni OM, et al. Atrial arrhythmias after surgical maze: findings during catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(7):1405–9.
Magnano AR, et al. Mechanisms of atrial tachyarrhythmias following surgical atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17(4):366–73.
McElderry HT, et al. Proarrhythmic aspects of atrial fibrillation surgery: mechanisms of postoperative macroreentrant tachycardias. Circulation. 2008;117(2):155–62.
McCarthy PM, et al. Where does atrial fibrillation surgery fail? Implications for increasing effectiveness of ablation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(4):860–7.
Zeng Y, et al. Recurrent atrial arrhythmia after minimally invasive pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(2):510–5.
Lee R, et al. Surgical treatment for isolated atrial fibrillation: minimally invasive vs. classic cut and sew maze. Innovations (Phila). 2011;6(6):373–7.
Kuck KH, et al. Impact of complete versus incomplete circumferential lines around the pulmonary veins during catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the gap-atrial fibrillation-German atrial fibrillation competence network 1 trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(1):e003337.
Verma A, et al. Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction. Circulation. 2005;112(5):627–35.
Macle L, et al. Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9994):672–9.
Cheema A, et al. Incidence and time course of early recovery of pulmonary vein conduction after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(4):387–91.
Rajappan K, et al. Acute and chronic pulmonary vein reconnection after atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective characterization of anatomical sites. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;31(12):1598–605.
Bansch D, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: wait or stop early after initial successful pulmonary vein isolation? Europace. 2013;15(2):183–8.
Nakamura K, et al. Optimal observation time after completion of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation to prevent chronic pulmonary vein reconnections. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(6):5300–10.
Wang XH, et al. Early identification and treatment of PV re-connections: role of observation time and impact on clinical results of atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2007;9(7):481–6.
Sauer WH, et al. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients referred for atrial fibrillation ablation: response to ablation that incorporates slow-pathway modification. Circulation. 2006;114(3):191–5.
Ninomiya Y, et al. Usefulness of the adenosine triphosphate with a sufficient observation period for detecting reconduction after pulmonary vein isolation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009;32(10):1307–12.
Yamane T, et al. Repeated provocation of time- and ATP-induced early pulmonary vein reconnections after pulmonary vein isolation: eliminating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in a single procedure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(5):601–8.
Kobori A, et al. Adenosine triphosphate-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: the UNmasking dormant electrical Reconduction by adenosine TriPhosphate (UNDER-ATP) trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(46):3276–87.
Pratola C, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: is the persistence of all intraprocedural targets necessary for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm? Circulation. 2008;117(2):136–43.
Jiang RH, et al. Incidence of pulmonary vein conduction recovery in patients without clinical recurrence after ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: mechanistic implications. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(6):969–76.
Arentz T, et al. “Dormant” pulmonary vein conduction revealed by adenosine after ostial radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15(9):1041–7.
Tritto M, et al. Adenosine restores atrio-venous conduction after apparently successful ostial isolation of the pulmonary veins. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(23):2155–63.
Datino T, et al. Mechanisms by which adenosine restores conduction in dormant canine pulmonary veins. Circulation. 2010;121(8):963–72.
Dallaglio PD, et al. The role of adenosine in pulmonary vein isolation: a critical review. Cardiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:8632509.
Kapa S, et al. Dose-dependent pulmonary vein reconnection in response to adenosine: relevance of atrioventricular block during infusion. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;47(1):117–23.
Andrade JG, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using “contact force” ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation–a prospective study. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(11):1919–24.
Eitel C, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and linear left atrial ablation as a single-catheter technique to achieve bidirectional conduction block: the pace-and-ablate approach. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(2):157–64.
Steven D, et al. Loss of pace capture on the ablation line: a new marker for complete radiofrequency lesions to achieve pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(3):323–30.
Andrade JG, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using a pace-capture-guided versus an adenosine-guided approach: effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation–a prospective study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(6):1103–8.
Steven D, et al. Benefit of pulmonary vein isolation guided by loss of pace capture on the ablation line: results from a prospective 2-center randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(1):44–50.
Schaeffer B, et al. Loss of pace capture on the ablation line during pulmonary vein isolation versus “dormant conduction”: is adenosine expendable? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(10):1075–80.
Gerstenfeld EP, et al. Utility of exit block for identifying electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13(10):971–9.
Vijayaraman P, et al. Assessment of exit block following pulmonary vein isolation: far-field capture masquerading as entrance without exit block. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(10):1653–9.
Ip JE, et al. Method for differentiating left superior pulmonary vein exit conduction from pseudo-exit conduction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36(3):299–308.
Spector P. Principles of cardiac electric propagation and their implications for re-entrant arrhythmias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(3):655–61.
Chen S, et al. Blocking the pulmonary vein to left atrium conduction in addition to the entrance block enhances clinical efficacy in atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35(5):524–31.
Kim JY, et al. Achievement of successful pulmonary vein isolation: methods of adenosine testing and incremental benefit of exit block. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;46(3):315–24.
Perez FJ, et al. Long-term outcomes after catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter: a meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(4):393–401.
Patel NJ, et al. Contemporary utilization and safety outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial flutter in the United States: analysis of 89,638 procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(6):1317–25.
Wazni O, et al. Randomized study comparing combined pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation versus pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection alone in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003;108(20):2479–83.
Natale A, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(7):1898–904.
Pappone C, et al. Prevention of iatrogenic atrial tachycardia after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study comparing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation with a modified approach. Circulation. 2004;110(19):3036–42.
Sawhney N, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation with additional linear ablation results in an increased incidence of left atrial flutter compared with segmental pulmonary vein isolation as an initial approach to ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(3):243–8.
Chae S, et al. Atrial tachycardia after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation: mechanistic insights, results of catheter ablation, and risk factors for recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(18):1781–7.
Ouyang F, et al. Characterization of reentrant circuits in left atrial macroreentrant tachycardia: critical isthmus block can prevent atrial tachycardia recurrence. Circulation. 2002;105(16):1934–42.
Matsuo S, et al. Peri-mitral atrial flutter in patients with atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(1):2–8.
Tzeis S, et al. The modified anterior line: an alternative linear lesion in perimitral flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(6):665–70.
Chen SA, Tai CT. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation originating from the non-pulmonary vein foci. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(2):229–32.
Haissaguerre M, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):659–66.
Lee SH, et al. Predictors of non-pulmonary vein ectopic beats initiating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: implication for catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(6):1054–9.
Hsieh MH, et al. Alterations of heart rate variability after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation originating from pulmonary veins. Circulation. 1999;100(22):2237–43.
Shah D, et al. Nonpulmonary vein foci: do they exist? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26(7 Pt 2):1631–5.
Lin D, et al. Provocability of atrial fibrillation triggers during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with infrequent AF [abstract]. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1(Suppl):S231.
Di Biase L, et al. Left atrial appendage: an underrecognized trigger site of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2010;122(2):109–18.
Santangeli P, et al. Prevalence and distribution of focal triggers in persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(2):374–82.
Lin WS, et al. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation initiated by non-pulmonary vein ectopy. Circulation. 2003;107(25):3176–83.
Lee RJ, et al. Percutaneous alternative to the maze procedure for the treatment of persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (aMAZE trial): rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2015;170(6):1184–94.
Zhao Y, et al. Importance of non-pulmonary vein triggers ablation to achieve long-term freedom from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with low ejection fraction. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(1):141–9.
Dixit S, et al. Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: RASTA study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(2):287–94.
Neuzil P, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(2):327–33.
Yokoyama K, et al. Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(5):354–62.
Ikeda A, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(6):1174–80.
Nakagawa H, et al. Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(4):746–53.
Nakagawa H, et al. Prospective study to test the ability to create RF lesions at predicted depth and diameter using a new formula incorporating contact force, radiofrequency power and application time (force-power-time index) in the beating heart [abstract]. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(Suppl):S548.
Kumar S, et al. Predictive value of impedance changes for real-time contact force measurements during catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias in humans. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(7):962–9.
Kumar S, et al. Prospective characterization of catheter-tissue contact force at different anatomic sites during antral pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(6):1124–9.
Reddy VY, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(11):1789–95.
Haldar S, et al. Contact force sensing technology identifies sites of inadequate contact and reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection: a prospective case control study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1160–6.
Perna F, et al. Assessment of catheter tip contact force resulting in cardiac perforation in swine atria using force sensing technology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(2):218–24.
Kimura M, et al. Comparison of lesion formation between contact force-guided and non-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: a prospective, randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(6):984–91.
Sohns C, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the relationship between contact force and left atrial scar formation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(2):138–45.
Martinek M, et al. Clinical impact of an open-irrigated radiofrequency catheter with direct force measurement on atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35(11):1312–8.
Marijon E, et al. Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(2):130–7.
Sigmund E, et al. Optimizing radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation by direct catheter force measurement-a case-matched comparison in 198 patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38(2):201–8.
Ullah W, et al. Randomized trial comparing pulmonary vein isolation using the SmartTouch catheter with or without real-time contact force data. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(9):1761–7.
Wakili R, et al. Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103(2):97–106.
Kumagai K, et al. A new approach for complete isolation of the posterior left atrium including pulmonary veins for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(10):1047–52.
Yamaguchi Y, et al. Long-term effects of box isolation on sympathovagal balance in atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2010;74(6):1096–103.
Kumagai K. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. State of the Art Circ J. 2011;75(10):2305–11.
Kim JS, et al. Does isolation of the left atrial posterior wall improve clinical outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation? A prospective randomized clinical trial. Int J Cardiol. 2015;181:277–83.
He X, et al. Left atrial posterior wall isolation reduces the recurrence of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;46(3):267–74.
Di Biase L, et al. Left atrial appendage isolation in patients with long-standing persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation: BELIEF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(18):1929–40.
Di Biase L, et al. Ablation versus amiodarone for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with congestive heart failure and an implanted device: results from the AATAC multicenter randomized trial. Circulation. 2016;133(17):1637–44.
Morillo CA, et al. Chronic rapid atrial pacing. Structural, functional, and electrophysiological characteristics of a new model of sustained atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1995;91(5):1588–95.
Harada A, et al. Atrial activation during chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with isolated mitral valve disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(1):104–11. discussion 111–112
Gray RA, Pertsov AM, Jalife J. Spatial and temporal organization during cardiac fibrillation. Nature. 1998;392(6671):75–8.
Berenfeld O, et al. Spatially distributed dominant excitation frequencies reveal hidden organization in atrial fibrillation in the Langendorff-perfused sheep heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11(8):869–79.
Mansour M, et al. Left-to-right gradient of atrial frequencies during acute atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. Circulation. 2001;103(21):2631–6.
Lazar S, et al. Presence of left-to-right atrial frequency gradient in paroxysmal but not persistent atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 2004;110(20):3181–6.
Atienza F, et al. Real-time dominant frequency mapping and ablation of dominant frequency sites in atrial fibrillation with left-to-right frequency gradients predicts long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(1):33–40.
Atienza F, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADAR-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(23):2455–67.
Vogler J, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation versus defragmentation: the CHASE-AF clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(24):2743–52.
Haissaguerre M, et al. Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(11):1138–47.
Nademanee K, et al. A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(11):2044–53.
O'Neill MD, et al. Long-term follow-up of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation using termination as a procedural endpoint. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(9):1105–12.
Lo LW, et al. Predicting factors for atrial fibrillation acute termination during catheter ablation procedures: implications for catheter ablation strategy and long-term outcome. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(3):311–8.
Zhang Z, et al. Linear ablation following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39(6):623–30.
Kim TH, et al. Linear ablation in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (Dallas lesion set) does not improve clinical outcome in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Europace. 2015;17(3):388–95.
Wynn GJ, et al. Biatrial linear ablation in sustained nonpermanent AF: results of the substrate modification with ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (SMAN-PAF) trial. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(2):399–406.
Kottkamp H, et al. Box isolation of fibrotic areas (BIFA): a patient-tailored substrate modification approach for ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(1):22–30.
Kottkamp H, Bender R, Berg J. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: how to modify the substrate? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(2):196–206.
Rolf S, et al. Tailored atrial substrate modification based on low-voltage areas in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(5):825–33.
Bai R, et al. Proven isolation of the pulmonary vein antrum with or without left atrial posterior wall isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(1):132–40.
Cutler MJ, et al. Impact of voltage mapping to guide whether to perform ablation of the posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(1):13–21.
Yang G, et al. Catheter ablation of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation using electrophysiologically guided substrate modification during sinus rhythm after pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(2):e003382.
Verma A, et al. Pre-existent left atrial scarring in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation: an independent predictor of procedural failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(2):285–92.
Kapa S, et al. Contact electroanatomic mapping derived voltage criteria for characterizing left atrial scar in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(10):1044–52.
Oakes RS, et al. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2009;119(13):1758–67.
McGann C, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation outcome is predicted by left atrial remodeling on MRI. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(1):23–30.
Dagres N, et al. Current ablation techniques for persistent atrial fibrillation: results of the European heart rhythm association survey. Europace. 2015;17(10):1596–600.
Nademanee K, et al. Clinical outcomes of catheter substrate ablation for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(8):843–9.
Haissaguerre M, et al. Localized sources maintaining atrial fibrillation organized by prior ablation. Circulation. 2006;113(5):616–25.
Haissaguerre M, et al. Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: critical structures for termination. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(11):1125–37.
Takahashi Y, et al. Characterization of electrograms associated with termination of chronic atrial fibrillation by catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(10):1003–10.
Singh SM, et al. Intraprocedural use of ibutilide to organize and guide ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms: preliminary assessment of a modified step-wise approach to ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(6):608–16.
Narayan SM, et al. Classifying fractionated electrograms in human atrial fibrillation using monophasic action potentials and activation mapping: evidence for localized drivers, rate acceleration, and nonlocal signal etiologies. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(2):244–53.
Verma A, et al. Selective CFAE targeting for atrial fibrillation study (SELECT AF): clinical rationale, design, and implementation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(5):541–7.
Quintanilla JG, et al. Mechanistic approaches to detect, target, and ablate the drivers of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(1):e002481.
Hansen BJ, et al. Atrial fibrillation driven by micro-anatomic intramural re-entry revealed by simultaneous sub-epicardial and sub-endocardial optical mapping in explanted human hearts. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(35):2390–401.
Cuculich PS, et al. Noninvasive characterization of epicardial activation in humans with diverse atrial fibrillation patterns. Circulation. 2010;122(S):1364–72.
Haissaguerre M, et al. Driver domains in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014;130(7):530–8.
Narayan SM, et al. Ablation of rotor and focal sources reduces late recurrence of atrial fibrillation compared with trigger ablation alone: extended follow-up of the CONFIRM trial (conventional ablation for atrial fibrillation with or without focal impulse and rotor modulation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(17):1761–8.
Lin YJ, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, mapping, and catheter ablation of potential rotors in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(5):851–8.
Lin Y-J, et al. Benefits of atrial substrate modification guided by electrogram similarity and phase mapping techniques to eliminate rotors and focal sources versus conventional defragmentation in persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2016;2(6):667–78.
Miller JM, et al. Initial independent outcomes from focal impulse and rotor modulation ablation for atrial fibrillation: multicenter FIRM registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(9):921–9.
Lin YJ, et al. Electrophysiological characteristics and catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal right atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005;112(12):1692–700.
Narayan SM, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (conventional ablation for atrial fibrillation with or without focal impulse and rotor modulation) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(7):628–36.
Rappel WJ, Narayan SM. Theoretical considerations for mapping activation in human cardiac fibrillation. Chaos. 2013;23(2):023113.
Gianni C, et al. Acute and early outcomes of focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM)-guided rotors-only ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(4):830–5.
Narayan SM, Zaman JA. Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation. J Physiol. 2016;594(9):2399–415.
Sommer P, et al. Successful repeat catheter ablation of recurrent long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation with rotor elimination as the procedural endpoint: a case series. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(3):274–80.
Buch E, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of focal impulse and rotor modulation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(3):636–41.
Benharash P, et al. Quantitative analysis of localized sources identified by focal impulse and rotor modulation mapping in atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(3):554–61.
Ramanathan C, et al. Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging for cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia. Nat Med. 2004;10(4):422–8.
Lim HS, et al. Noninvasive mapping to guide atrial fibrillation ablation. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015;7(1):89–98.
Yamashita S, et al. Body surface mapping to guide atrial fibrillation ablation. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev. 2015;4(3):172–6.
Guillem MS, et al. Noninvasive mapping of human atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(5):507–13.
Guillem MS, et al. Noninvasive localization of maximal frequency sites of atrial fibrillation by body surface potential mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(2):294–301.
Rodrigo M, et al. Body surface localization of left and right atrial high-frequency rotors in atrial fibrillation patients: a clinical-computational study. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(9):1584–91.
Armour JA, et al. Gross and microscopic anatomy of the human intrinsic cardiac nervous system. Anat Rec. 1997;247(2):289–98.
Po SS, Nakagawa H, Jackman WM. Localization of left atrial ganglionated plexi in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(10):1186–9.
Patterson E, et al. Triggered firing in pulmonary veins initiated by in vitro autonomic nerve stimulation. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2(6):624–31.
Choi EK, et al. Intrinsic cardiac nerve activity and paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia in ambulatory dogs. Circulation. 2010;121(24):2615–23.
Katritsis DG, et al. Autonomic denervation added to pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(24):2318–25.
Nakagawa H, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of autonomic ganglionated plexus ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(12 Suppl):S26–34.
Bettoni M, Zimmermann M. Autonomic tone variations before the onset of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2002;105(23):2753–9.
Pauza DH, et al. Morphology, distribution, and variability of the epicardiac neural ganglionated subplexuses in the human heart. Anat Rec. 2000;259(4):353–82.
Scherlag BJ, et al. Electrical stimulation to identify neural elements on the heart: their role in atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005;13(Suppl 1):37–42.
Patterson E, et al. Sodium-calcium exchange initiated by the Ca2+ transient: an arrhythmia trigger within pulmonary veins. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(6):1196–206.
Lemola K, et al. Pulmonary vein region ablation in experimental vagal atrial fibrillation: role of pulmonary veins versus autonomic ganglia. Circulation. 2008;117(4):470–7.
Nishida K, et al. The role of pulmonary veins vs. autonomic ganglia in different experimental substrates of canine atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89(4):825–33.
Nishida K, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation: translating basic mechanistic insights to the patient. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:823–31.
Stavrakis S, et al. The role of the autonomic ganglia in atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;1(1-2):1–13.
Pokushalov E, et al. Left atrial ablation at the anatomic areas of ganglionated plexi for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33(10):1231–8.
Pokushalov E, et al. Ganglionated plexi ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010;12(3):342–6.
Pokushalov E, et al. Catheter versus surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation after a failed initial pulmonary vein isolation procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(12):1338–43.
Pokushalov E, et al. Ganglionated plexus ablation vs linear ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for persistent/long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(9):1280–6.
Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2004;110(9):1042–6.
Mahajan R, et al. Electrophysiological, electroanatomical, and structural remodeling of the atria as consequences of sustained obesity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(1):1–11.
Wokhlu A, et al. Long-term outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation: impact and predictors of very late recurrence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(10):1071–8.
Dublin S, et al. Risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in relation to body mass index. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(21):2322–8.
Gami AS, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea, obesity, and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(5):565–71.
Tedrow UB, et al. The long- and short-term impact of elevated body mass index on the risk of new atrial fibrillation the WHS (Women's health study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(21):2319–27.
Huxley RR, et al. Absolute and attributable risks of atrial fibrillation in relation to optimal and borderline risk factors: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 2011;123(14):1501–8.
Munger TM, et al. Electrophysiological and hemodynamic characteristics associated with obesity in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(9):851–60.
Abed HS, et al. Obesity results in progressive atrial structural and electrical remodeling: implications for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(1):90–100.
Richter B, et al. Is inducibility of atrial fibrillation after radio frequency ablation really a relevant prognostic factor? Eur Heart J. 2006;27(21):2553–9.
Jongnarangsin K, et al. Body mass index, obstructive sleep apnea, and outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(7):668–72.
Shah AN, et al. Long-term outcome following successful pulmonary vein isolation: pattern and prediction of very late recurrence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(7):661–7.
Chang SL, et al. Comparison of outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with versus without the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103(1):67–72.
Letsas KP, et al. Pre-ablative predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation: the potential role of inflammation. Europace. 2009;11(2):158–63.
Tang RB, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. Circ J. 2009;73(3):438–43.
Jin Hwang H, et al. Atrial electroanatomical remodeling as a determinant of different outcomes between two current ablation strategies: circumferential pulmonary vein isolation vs pulmonary vein isolation. Clin Cardiol. 2010;33(3):E69–74.
Patel D, et al. Outcomes and complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in females. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(2):167–72.
Patel D, et al. Safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein antral isolation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: the impact of continuous positive airway pressure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(5):445–51.
Patel D, et al. The impact of statins and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers on pulmonary vein antrum isolation outcomes in post-menopausal females. Europace. 2010;12(3):322–30.
Chao TF, et al. Associations between renal function, atrial substrate properties and outcome of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2011;75(10):2326–32.
Winkle RA, et al. Relation of early termination of persistent atrial fibrillation by cardioversion or drugs to ablation outcomes. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(3):374–9.
Wong CX, et al. Pericardial fat is associated with atrial fibrillation severity and ablation outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(17):1745–51.
Kang JH, et al. Prediction of long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation by parameters of preablation DC cardioversion. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(11):1165–70.
Mohanty S, et al. Impact of metabolic syndrome on procedural outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(14):1295–301.
Ejima K, et al. Impact of diastolic dysfunction on the outcome of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013;164(1):88–93.
Letsas KP, et al. The impact of body mass index on the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013;164(1):94–8.
Wong CX, et al. Obesity and the risk of incident, post-operative, and post-ablation atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of 626,603 individuals in 51 studies. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2015;1(3):139–52.
Alonso A, et al. Effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on atrial fibrillation risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes: the Look AHEAD randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2015;170(4):770–777.e5.
Pathak RK, et al. Aggressive risk factor reduction study for atrial fibrillation and implications for the outcome of ablation: the ARREST-AF cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):2222–31.
Bitter T, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing and cardiac arrhythmias. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(7):928–34.
Fletcher EC. Effect of episodic hypoxia on sympathetic activity and blood pressure. Respir Physiol. 2000;119(2-3):189–97.
Kraiczi H, et al. Increased vasoconstrictor sensitivity in obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol. 1985;89(2):493–8.
Ghias M, et al. The role of ganglionated plexi in apnea-related atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(22):2075–83.
Linz D, et al. Negative tracheal pressure during obstructive respiratory events promotes atrial fibrillation by vagal activation. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(9):1436–43.
Linz D, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation suppresses postapneic blood pressure rises and atrial fibrillation in a model for sleep apnea. Hypertension. 2012;60(1):172–8.
Linz D, et al. Effect of renal denervation on neurohumoral activation triggering atrial fibrillation in obstructive sleep apnea. Hypertension. 2013;62(4):767–74.
Iwasaki YK, et al. Determinants of atrial fibrillation in an animal model of obesity and acute obstructive sleep apnea. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(9):1409–1416.e1.
Iwasaki YK, et al. Atrial fibrillation promotion with long-term repetitive obstructive sleep apnea in a rat model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(19):2013–23.
Dimitri H, et al. Atrial remodeling in obstructive sleep apnea: implications for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(3):321–7.
Stevenson IH, et al. Atrial electrophysiology is altered by acute hypercapnia but not hypoxemia: implications for promotion of atrial fibrillation in pulmonary disease and sleep apnea. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(9):1263–70.
Holmqvist F, et al. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation-results from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF). Am Heart J. 2015;169(5):647–654.e2.
Kwon Y, et al. Association of sleep characteristics with atrial fibrillation: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Thorax. 2015;70(9):873–9.
Kanagala R, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003;107(20):2589–94.
Fein AS, et al. Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(4):300–5.
Matiello M, et al. Low efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in severe obstructive sleep apnoea patients. Europace. 2010;12(8):1084–9.
Naruse Y, et al. Concomitant obstructive sleep apnea increases the recurrence of atrial fibrillation following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: clinical impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(3):331–7.
Neilan TG, et al. Effect of sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac structure and recurrence of atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(6):e000421.
Li L, et al. Efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea with and without continuous positive airway pressure treatment: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Europace. 2014;16(9):1309–14.
Raitt MH, et al. Reversal of electrical remodeling after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15(5):507–12.
Chalfoun N, et al. Reverse electrical remodeling of the atria post cardioversion in patients who remain in sinus rhythm assessed by signal averaging of the P-wave. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007;30(4):502–9.
Igarashi M, et al. Effect of restoration of sinus rhythm by extensive antiarrhythmic drugs in predicting results of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(1):62–8.
Rivard L, et al. Improved outcome following restoration of sinus rhythm prior to catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: a comparative multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(7):1025–30.
Mohanty S, et al. Effect of periprocedural amiodarone on procedure outcome in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing extended pulmonary vein antrum isolation: results from a randomized study (SPECULATE). Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(3):477–83.
Robbins IM, et al. Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1998;98(17):1769–75.
Ernst S, et al. Total pulmonary vein occlusion as a consequence of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation mimicking primary lung disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14(4):366–70.
Mansour M, et al. Assessment of pulmonary vein anatomic variability by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for catheter ablation techniques for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15(4):387–93.
Holmes DR Jr, Monahan KH, Packer D. Pulmonary vein stenosis complicating ablation for atrial fibrillation: clinical spectrum and interventional considerations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(4):267–76.
Fender EA, Packer DL, Holmes Jr. DR. Pulmonary vein stenosis after atrial fibrillation ablation. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(Suppl X):X31–4.
Di Biase L, et al. Pulmonary vein total occlusion following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: clinical implications after long-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(12):2493–9.
Prieto LR, et al. Comparison of stent versus balloon angioplasty for pulmonary vein stenosis complicating pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(7):673–8.
Packer DL, et al. Clinical presentation, investigation, and management of pulmonary vein stenosis complicating ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005;111(5):546–54.
Taylor GW, et al. Pathological effects of extensive radiofrequency energy applications in the pulmonary veins in dogs. Circulation. 2000;101(14):1736–42.
Arentz T, et al. Incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis 2 years after radiofrequency catheter ablation of refractory atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(10):963–9.
Tse HF, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using transvenous catheter cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation without risk of pulmonary vein stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(4):752–8.
Kasper L, et al. Hemoptysis and lung disease as a manifestation of pulmonary vein stenosis after cryoballoon catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2016;126(1-2):94–6.
Dong J, et al. Incidence and predictors of pulmonary vein stenosis following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the anatomic pulmonary vein ablation approach: results from paired magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(8):845–52.
Hoyt RH, et al. Transvenous catheter cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of a feasibility study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28(Suppl 1):S78–82.
Saad EB, et al. Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: emergence of a new clinical syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(8):634–8.
Hilbert S, et al. Pulmonary vein collateral formation as a long-term result of post-interventional pulmonary vein stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(31):2474.
Hilbert S, Sommer P, Bollmann A. Pulmonary vein dilatation in a case of total pulmonary vein occlusion: contemporary approach using a combination of 3D-mapping system and image integration. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88(7):E227–32.
Fender EA, et al. Severe pulmonary vein stenosis resulting from ablation for atrial fibrillation: presentation, management, and clinical outcomes. Circulation. 2016;134(23):1812–21.
De Potter TJ, et al. Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of pulmonary vein stenosis after atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2011;13(1):57–61.
Kanter KR, Kirshbom PM, Kogon BE. Surgical repair of pulmonary venous stenosis: a word of caution. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1687–91. discussion 1691–1692
Patel NS, et al. Successful surgical repair of iatrogenic pulmonary vein stenosis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(6):656–8.
Bharat A, et al. Lung transplant is a viable treatment option for patients with congenital and acquired pulmonary vein stenosis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(6):621–5.
Ponamgi SP, et al. Catheter-based intervention for pulmonary vein stenosis due to fibrosing mediastinitis: the Mayo Clinic experience. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015;8:103–7.
Mohanty S, et al. Impact of alcohol intake on thromboembolic events following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12_S).
Di Biase L, et al. Esophageal capsule endoscopy after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: documented higher risk of luminal esophageal damage with general anesthesia as compared with conscious sedation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(2):108–12.
Cappato R, et al. Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005;111(9):1100–5.
Pappone C, et al. Atrio-esophageal fistula as a complication of percutaneous transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004;109(22):2724–6.
Martinek M, et al. Identification of a high-risk population for esophageal injury during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: procedural and anatomical considerations. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(9):1224–30.
Singh SM, et al. Clinical outcomes after repair of left atrial esophageal fistulas occurring after atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(11):1591–7.
Bunch TJ, et al. Temporary esophageal stenting allows healing of esophageal perforations following atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17(4):435–9.
Cappato R, et al. Prevalence and causes of fatal outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(19):1798–803.
Tan C, Coffey A. Atrioesophageal fistula after surgical unipolar radiofrequency atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(3):e61–2.
Mohanty S. Outcomes of atrio-esophageal fistula following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation treated with surgical repair versus esophageal stenting. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(9):E6.
Mohanty S, et al. Outcomes of atrioesophageal fistula following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation treated with surgical repair versus esophageal stenting. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(6):579–84.
Cappato R, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(1):32–8.
Gillinov AM, Pettersson G, Rice TW. Esophageal injury during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(6):1239–40.
Mohr FW, et al. Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation: short-term and midterm results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123(5):919–27.
Doll N, et al. Esophageal perforation during left atrial radiofrequency ablation: is the risk too high? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125(4):836–42.
Sonmez B, et al. A fatal complication due to radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: atrio-esophageal fistula. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(1):281–3.
Scanavacca MI, et al. Left atrial-esophageal fistula following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15(8):960–2.
Borchert B, et al. Lethal atrioesophageal fistula after pulmonary vein isolation using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(1):145–8.
Ghia KK, et al. A nationwide survey on the prevalence of atrioesophageal fistula after left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;24(1):33–6.
Gilcrease GW, Stein JB. A delayed case of fatal atrioesophageal fistula following radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(6):708–11.
Stockigt F, et al. Atrioesophageal fistula after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(11):1254–7.
Yousuf O, Calkins H. Sounding the warning on the potential for oesophageal injury resulting from use of the nMARQ for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17(3):343–4.
Jackson PG, et al. The vagus plays a role in the anti-reflux barrier by controlling both the lower esophageal sphincter pressure and crural diaphragm activity. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(3 Suppl):S11.
Nolker G, et al. Esophageal acid levels after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S228–30.
Medeiros De Vasconcelos JT, et al. Atrial-oesophageal fistula following percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the risk still persists. Europace. 2017;19(2):250–8.
Rillig A, et al. Modified energy settings are mandatory to minimize oesophageal injury using the novel multipolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2015;17(3):396–402.
Chavez P, et al. Atrioesophageal fistula following ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation: systematic review of case reports. Open Heart. 2015;2(1):e000257.
Mateos JC, et al. Simplified method for esophagus protection during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation–prospective study of 704 cases. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2015;30(2):139–47.
Shim HB, et al. Successful management of atrio-esophageal fistula after cardiac radiofrequency catheter ablation. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;46(2):142–5.
Black-Maier E, et al. Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact-force sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2017;S1547–5271(17):30452–6.
Santangeli P, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation under therapeutic warfarin reduces periprocedural complications: evidence from a meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(2):302–11.
Di Biase L, et al. Periprocedural stroke and management of major bleeding complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the impact of periprocedural therapeutic international normalized ratio. Circulation. 2010;121(23):2550–6.
Wazni OM, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with therapeutic international normalized ratio: comparison of strategies of anticoagulation management in the periprocedural period. Circulation. 2007;116(22):2531–4.
Schmidt M, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with therapeutic international normalized ratios. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009;32(8):995–9.
Hakalahti A, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with therapeutic oral anticoagulation treatment. Europace. 2011;13(5):640–5.
Di Biase L, et al. Periprocedural stroke and bleeding complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with different anticoagulation management: results from the role of Coumadin in preventing thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing catheter ablation (COMPARE) randomized trial. Circulation. 2014;129(25):2638–44.
Hohnloser SH, Camm AJ. Safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of the literature. Europace. 2013;15(10):1407–11.
Calkins H, et al. RE-CIRCUIT study-randomized evaluation of dabigatran etexilate compared to warfarin in pulmonary vein ablation: assessment of an uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation strategy. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(1):154–5.
Cappato R, et al. Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists for catheter ablation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(28):1805–11.
Di Biase L, et al. Feasibility and safety of uninterrupted periprocedural apixaban administration in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(6):1162–8.
Bassiouny M, et al. Use of dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(3):460–6.
Bin Abdulhak AA, et al. Safety and efficacy of interrupted dabigatran for peri-procedural anticoagulation in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2013;15(10):1412–20.
Providencia R, et al. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2014;16(8):1137–44.
Winkle RA, et al. Peri-procedural interrupted oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation ablation: comparison of aspirin, warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Europace. 2014;16(10):1443–9.
Armbruster HL, et al. Safety of novel oral anticoagulants compared with uninterrupted warfarin for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49(3):278–84.
Ren JF, Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ. Left atrial thrombus associated with ablation for atrial fibrillation: identification with intracardiac echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(10):1861–7.
Saksena S, et al. A prospective comparison of cardiac imaging using intracardiac echocardiography with transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: the intracardiac echocardiography guided cardioversion helps interventional procedures study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(6):571–7.
Baran J, et al. Intracardiac echocardiography for detection of thrombus in the left atrial appendage: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation: the action-ice I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(6):1074–81.
Ren JF, et al. Intracardiac echocardiographic diagnosis of thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage: a complementary role to transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2013;30(1):72–80.
Anter E, et al. Comparison of intracardiac echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography for imaging of the right and left atrial appendages. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(11):1890–7.
Sriram CS, et al. Detection of left atrial thrombus by intracardiac echocardiography in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43(3):227–36.
Maleki K, et al. Intracardiac ultrasound detection of thrombus on transseptal sheath: incidence, treatment, and prevention. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(6):561–5.
Wazni OM, et al. Embolic events and char formation during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different anticoagulation regimens and importance of intracardiac echo imaging. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(6):576–81.
Shah D. Filamentous thrombi during left-sided sheath-assisted catheter ablations. Europace. 2010;12(12):1657–8.
Ren JF, et al. Increased intensity of anticoagulation may reduce risk of thrombus during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures in patients with spontaneous echo contrast. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(5):474–7.
Bruce CJ, et al. Early heparinization decreases the incidence of left atrial thrombi detected by intracardiac echocardiography during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;22(3):211–9.
Asbach S, et al. Early heparin administration reduces risk for left atrial thrombus formation during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:615087.
Briceno DF, et al. Clinical impact of heparin kinetics during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(6):683–93.
Chilukuri K, et al. Incidence and outcomes of protamine reactions in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;25(3):175–81.
Thygesen K, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(22):2173–95.
Helps SC, et al. The effect of gas emboli on rabbit cerebral blood flow. Stroke. 1990;21(1):94–9.
Krivonyak GS, Warren SG. Cerebral arterial air embolism treated by a vertical head-down maneuver. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;49(2):185–7.
Cauchemez B, et al. High-flow perfusion of sheaths for prevention of thromboembolic complications during complex catheter ablation in the LA. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15(3):276–83.
Kuwahara T, et al. Clinical characteristics of massive air embolism complicating left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation: lessons from five cases. Europace. 2012;14(2):204–8.
Franzen OW, et al. Mechanisms underlying air aspiration in patients undergoing left atrial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;71(4):553–8.
Ryu KH, et al. Heparin reduces neurological impairment after cerebral arterial air embolism in the rabbit. Stroke. 1996;27(2):303–9. discussion 310
Gaita F, et al. Incidence of silent cerebral thromboembolic lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation may change according to technology used: comparison of irrigated radiofrequency, multipolar nonirrigated catheter and cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(9):961–8.
Herrera Siklody C, et al. Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(7):681–8.
Verma A, et al. Evaluation and reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism in ablation of atrial fibrillation, but high prevalence of chronic silent infarction: results of the evaluation of reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(5):835–42.
De Greef Y, et al. Low rate of asymptomatic cerebral embolism and improved procedural efficiency with the novel pulmonary vein ablation catheter GOLD: results of the PRECISION GOLD trial. Europace. 2016;18(5):687–95.
Deneke T, et al. Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):455–63.
Merchant FM, Delurgio DB. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and risk of asymptomatic cerebral embolism. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(3):389–97.
Lickfett L, et al. Cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a tool to monitor the thrombogenicity of left atrial catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17(1):1–7.
Gaita F, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a cause of silent thromboembolism? Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cerebral thromboembolism in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2010;122(17):1667–73.
Schrickel JW, et al. Incidence and predictors of silent cerebral embolism during pulmonary vein catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010;12(1):52–7.
Deneke T, et al. Postablation asymptomatic cerebral lesions: long-term follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(11):1705–11.
Sauren LD, et al. Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during endocardial pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of three different ablation techniques. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(10):1102–7.
Wieczorek M, et al. Investigation into causes of abnormal cerebral MRI findings following PVAC duty-cycled, phased RF ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(2):121–8.
Bendszus M, Stoll G. Silent cerebral ischaemia: hidden fingerprints of invasive medical procedures. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(4):364–72.
Kruis RW, Vlasveld FA, Van Dijk D. The (un)importance of cerebral microemboli. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;14(2):111–8.
Medi C, et al. Subtle post-procedural cognitive dysfunction after atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(6):531–9.
Ichiki H, et al. The incidence of asymptomatic cerebral microthromboembolism after atrial fibrillation ablation: comparison of warfarin and dabigatran. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36(11):1328–35.
Nagy-Balo E, et al. Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison of two ablation techniques. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(3):473–80.
Vermeer SE, et al. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(13):1215–22.
Neven K, et al. Fatal end of a safety algorithm for pulmonary vein isolation with use of high-intensity focused ultrasound. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(3):260–5.
Ripley KL, et al. Time course of esophageal lesions after catheter ablation with cryothermal and radiofrequency ablation: implication for atrio-esophageal fistula formation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(6):642–6.
Ahmed H, et al. The esophageal effects of cryoenergy during cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(7):962–9.
Kawasaki R, et al. Atrioesophageal fistula complicating cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(7):787–92.
Lim HW, et al. Atrioesophageal fistula during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(2):208–13.
Yokoyama K, et al. Canine model of esophageal injury and atrial-esophageal fistula after applications of forward-firing high-intensity focused ultrasound and side-firing unfocused ultrasound in the left atrium and inside the pulmonary vein. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(1):41–9.
Singh SM, et al. Esophageal injury and temperature monitoring during atrial fibrillation ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(3):162–8.
Kuwahara T, et al. Safe and effective ablation of atrial fibrillation: importance of esophageal temperature monitoring to avoid periesophageal nerve injury as a complication of pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(1):1–6.
Contreras-Valdes FM, et al. Severity of esophageal injury predicts time to healing after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(12):1862–8.
Leite LR, et al. Luminal esophageal temperature monitoring with a deflectable esophageal temperature probe and intracardiac echocardiography may reduce esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures: results of a pilot study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(2):149–56.
Tschabrunn CM, et al. Comparison between single- and multi-sensor oesophageal temperature probes during atrial fibrillation ablation: thermodynamic characteristics. Europace. 2015;17(6):891–7.
Deneke T, et al. Utility of esophageal temperature monitoring during pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation using duty-cycled phased radiofrequency ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(3):255–61.
Carroll BJ, et al. Multi-sensor esophageal temperature probe used during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with increased intraluminal temperature detection and increased risk of esophageal injury compared to single-sensor probe. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(9):958–64.
Muller P, et al. Higher incidence of esophageal lesions after ablation of atrial fibrillation related to the use of esophageal temperature probes. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(7):1464–9.
Tsuchiya T, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation with esophageal cooling with a cooled water-irrigated intraesophageal balloon: a pilot study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(2):145–50.
Arruda MS, et al. Feasibility and safety of using an esophageal protective system to eliminate esophageal thermal injury: implications on atrial-esophageal fistula following AF ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(11):1272–8.
Kuwahara T, et al. Oesophageal cooling with ice water does not reduce the incidence of oesophageal lesions complicating catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: randomized controlled study. Europace. 2014;16(6):834–9.
Kuwahara T, et al. Incidences of esophageal injury during esophageal temperature monitoring: a comparative study of a multi-thermocouple temperature probe and a deflectable temperature probe in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;39(3):251–7.
Chugh A, et al. Mechanical displacement of the esophagus in patients undergoing left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(3):319–22.
Koruth JS, et al. Mechanical esophageal displacement during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(2):147–54.
Zellerhoff S, Lenze F, Eckardt L. Prophylactic proton pump inhibition after atrial fibrillation ablation: is there any evidence? Europace. 2011;13(9):1219–21.
Zellerhoff S, et al. Fatal course of esophageal stenting of an atrioesophageal fistula after atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(4):624–6.
Khan M, et al. Medical treatments in the short term management of reflux oesophagitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2:CD003244.
Kahrilas PJ. Clinical practice. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(16):1700–7.
Shaheen NJ, et al. Pantoprazole reduces the size of postbanding ulcers after variceal band ligation: a randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology. 2005;41(3):588–94.
Halm U, et al. Thermal esophageal lesions after radiofrequency catheter ablation of left atrial arrhythmias. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(3):551–6.
Knopp H, et al. Incidental and ablation-induced findings during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study of 425 patients. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(4):574–8.
Dagres N, et al. Rapid detection and successful treatment of esophageal perforation after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: lessons from five cases. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17(11):1213–5.
Eitel C, et al. Successful nonsurgical treatment of esophagopericardial fistulas after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a case series. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(4):675–81.
Hazell W, et al. Atrio-oesophageal fistula: an emergent complication of radiofrequency ablation. Emerg Med Australas. 2009;21(4):329–32.
Cazavet A, et al. Successful surgery for atrioesophageal fistula caused by transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(3):e43–5.
Podgaetz E, Deschamps C. Esophageal complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a case report. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):e9–e13.
Queneherve L, et al. Endoscopic management of an esophagopericardial fistula after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(21):3352–3.
Gunes MF, et al. Ablating the posterior heart: cardioesophageal fistula complicating radiofrequency ablation in the coronary sinus. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(12):1376–8.
Qadeer MA, et al. Endoscopic clips for closing esophageal perforations: case report and pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66(3):605–11.
Ellis CR, et al. Successful treatment of esophageal perforation following atrial fibrillation ablation with a fully covered esophageal stent: prevention of atrial-esophageal fistula. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Management. 2012;3:874–8.
Markar SR, et al. Novel multimodality endoscopic closure of postoperative esophageal fistula. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2012;3(11):577–9.
Andrade JG, et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of published studies. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(9):1444–51.
Deshmukh A, et al. In-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures. Circulation. 2013;128(19):2104–12.
Cappato R, et al. Delayed cardiac tamponade after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a worldwide report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(25):2696–7.
Eick OJ, Gerritse B, Schumacher B. Popping phenomena in temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation: when and why do they occur? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23(2):253–8.
Fisher JD, et al. Internal transcardiac pericardiocentesis for acute tamponade. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(12):1388–9. A6
Hsu LF, et al. Transcardiac pericardiocentesis: an emergency life-saving technique for cardiac tamponade. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14(9):1001–3.
Bunch TJ, et al. Outcomes after cardiac perforation during radiofrequency ablation of the atrium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(11):1172–9.
Hsu LF, et al. Incidence and prevention of cardiac tamponade complicating ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28(Suppl 1):S106–9.
Michowitz Y, et al. Effects of sex on the incidence of cardiac tamponade after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: results from a worldwide survey in 34 943 atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(2):274–80.
Tsang TS, et al. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(5):429–36.
O'Neill MD, et al. Two techniques to avoid surgery for cardiac tamponade occurring during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(3):323–5.
Takahashi Y, et al. Acute occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery during mitral isthmus linear ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(10):1104–7.
Chugh A, et al. Manifestations of coronary arterial injury during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(11):1638–45.
Makimoto H, et al. Aborted sudden cardiac death due to radiofrequency ablation within the coronary sinus and subsequent total occlusion of the circumflex artery. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(8):929–32.
Kitamura T, et al. Transient sinus node dysfunction following sinus node artery occlusion due to radiofrequency catheter ablation of the septal superior vena cava-right atrium junction. J Electrocardiol. 2016;49(1):18–22.
Ouali S, et al. Acute coronary occlusion during radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13(10):1047–9.
Mykytsey A, et al. Right coronary artery occlusion during RF ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(7):818–21.
Sticherling C, Pfister O, Osswald S. Thrombo-embolic occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery complicating left atrial radiofrequency ablation. Europace. 2009;11(1):117–8.
Wong KC, et al. High incidence of acute sub-clinical circumflex artery ‘injury’ following mitral isthmus ablation. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(15):1881–90.
Fayad G, et al. Circumflex artery stenosis induced by intraoperative radiofrequency ablation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(4):1291–3.
Piccini JP, et al. Outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2012;126(18):2200–7.
Lakkireddy D, et al. Effect of atrial fibrillation ablation on gastric motility: the atrial fibrillation gut study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(3):531–6.
Dumonceau JM, et al. Acute delayed gastric emptying after ablation of atrial fibrillation: treatment with botulinum toxin injection. Endoscopy. 2006;38(5):543.
Bunch TJ, et al. Vagus nerve injury after posterior atrial radiofrequency ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(9):1327–30.
Kuwahara T, et al. Clinical characteristics and management of periesophageal vagal nerve injury complicating left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation: lessons from eleven cases. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(8):847–51.
Miyazaki S, et al. Factors associated with periesophageal vagal nerve injury after pulmonary vein antrum isolation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(5):e001209.
Chopra N, Shadchehr A. Achalasia cardia as a unique complication of pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(12):2297–9.
Schwartz TW, et al. Pancreatic-polypeptide response to food in duodenal-ulcer patients before and after vagotomy. Lancet. 1976;1(7969):1102–5.
Ajaj W, et al. Real time high resolution magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of gastric motility disorders. Gut. 2004;53(9):1256–61.
Pisani CF, et al. Gastric hypomotility following epicardial vagal denervation ablation to treat atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(2):211–3.
Kanaeda T, et al. Evaluation of periesophageal nerve injury after pulmonary vein isolation using the (13)C-acetate breath test. J Arrhythm. 2015;31(6):364–70.
Lo LW, et al. A novel finding—impairment of gastric myoelectricity after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2013;77(8):2014–23.
Janssens J, et al. Improvement of gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis by erythromycin. Preliminary studies. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(15):1028–31.
Jones MP, Maganti K. A systematic review of surgical therapy for gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(10):2122–9.
Tavernier R, Duytschaever M, Taeymans Y. Fracture of a circular mapping catheter after entrapment in the mitral valve apparatus during segmental pulmonary vein isolation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26(8):1774–5.
Grove R, et al. Demand for open heart surgery due to entrapment of a circular mapping catheter in the mitral valve in a patient undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2008;97(9):628–9.
Lakkireddy D, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral or aortic mechanical prosthetic valves: a feasibility, safety, and efficacy study. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(7):975–80.
Zeljko HM, et al. Entrapment of the circular mapping catheter in the mitral valve in two patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2011;13(1):132–3.
Desimone CV, et al. Catheter ablation related mitral valve injury: the importance of early recognition and rescue mitral valve repair. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(9):971–5.
Gurbuz O, et al. Case report: paravalvular leak as a complication of percutaneous catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;9:187.
Mansour M, et al. Successful release of entrapped circumferential mapping catheters in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1(5):558–61.
Wu RC, et al. Circular mapping catheter entrapment in the mitral valve apparatus: a previously unrecognized complication of focal atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13(8):819–21.
Deftereos S, et al. Colchicine for prevention of early atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: a randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(18):1790–6.
Deftereos S, et al. Colchicine for prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: mid-term efficacy and effect on quality of life. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(4):620–8.
Stabile G, et al. Low incidence of permanent complications during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using open-irrigated catheters: a multicentre registry. Europace. 2014;16(8):1154–9.
Luckie M, et al. Dressler's syndrome following pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Acute Card Care. 2008;10(4):234–5.
Lambert T, et al. Cardiac tamponade following pericarditis 18 days after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010;99(9):595–7.
Torihashi S, et al. Two cases of delayed cardiac tamponade due to pericarditis after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation. Intern Med. 2015;54(7):791–6.
Kim DR, et al. Comparison of two different doses of single bolus steroid injection to prevent atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(2):324–31.
Kesek M, et al. Entrapment of circular mapping catheter in the mitral valve. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(1):17–9.
Kuck KH, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality-of-life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2858–65.
Sohara H, et al. Feasibility of the radiofrequency hot balloon catheter for isolation of the posterior left atrium and pulmonary veins for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(3):225–32.
Evonich RF, Nori DM, Haines DE. Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with a novel hot balloon ablation catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;34(1):29–36.
Chun KR, et al. The ‘single big cryoballoon’ technique for acute pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective observational single centre study. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(6):699–709.
Hoyt H, et al. Complications arising from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: temporal trends and predictors. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(12):1869–74.
Guhl EN, et al. Efficacy of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(4):423–7.
Earley MJ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmias guided by non-fluoroscopic catheter location: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(10):1223–9.
Sarabanda AV, et al. Efficacy and safety of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using a novel cryothermal balloon ablation system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(10):1902–12.
Guiot A, et al. Collateral nervous damages after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(4):346–51.
Metzner A, et al. The incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation 28 mm cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(5):466–70.
Okumura Y, et al. Distortion of right superior pulmonary vein anatomy by balloon catheters as a contributor to phrenic nerve injury. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(10):1151–7.
Arruda M, et al. Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava: an adjunctive strategy to pulmonary vein antrum isolation improving the outcome of AF ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(12):1261–6.
Miyazaki S, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcome of phrenic nerve injury during superior vena cava isolation and circumferential pulmonary vein antrum isolation using radiofrequency energy. Am Heart J. 2014;168(6):846–53.
Wissner E, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava is associated with major intraprocedural complications. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(12):1755–60.
Elayi CS, et al. Left superior vena cava isolation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation: impact on atrial fibrillation recurrence. Heart Rhythm. 2006;3(9):1019–23.
Liu H, et al. Electrogram-guided isolation of the left superior vena cava for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2007;9(9):775–80.
Yong Ji S, et al. Phrenic nerve injury: an underrecognized and potentially preventable complication of pulmonary vein isolation using a wide-area circumferential ablation approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(10):1086–91.
Franceschi F, et al. Phrenic nerve monitoring with diaphragmatic electromyography during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: the first human application. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(7):1068–71.
Miyazaki S, et al. Prospective evaluation of bilateral diaphragmatic electromyograms during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(6):622–8.
Mondesert B, et al. Clinical experience with a novel electromyographic approach to preventing phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(4):605–11.
Sacher F, et al. Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: characterization and outcome in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(12):2498–503.
Andrade JG, et al. Histopathology of cryoballoon ablation-induced phrenic nerve injury. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(2):187–94.
Pappone C, et al. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: a new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000;102(21):2619–28.
Dukkipati SR, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using a visually guided laser balloon catheter: the first 200-patient multicenter clinical experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(3):467–72.
Katz ES, et al. Surgical left atrial appendage ligation is frequently incomplete: a transesophageal echocardiograhic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(2):468–71.
Caponi D, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation: does the addition of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the left atrium to electroanatomic mapping improve the clinical outcome? A randomized comparison of Carto-merge vs. Carto-XP three-dimensional mapping ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010;12(8):1098–104.
Proietti R, et al. Remote magnetic with open-irrigated catheter vs. manual navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2013;15(9):1241–8.
Ferguson JD, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation without fluoroscopy using intracardiac echocardiography and electroanatomic mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(6):611–9.
Calkins H, et al. Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections. Circulation. 1991;84(6):2376–82.
Lindsay BD, et al. Radiation exposure to patients and medical personnel during radiofrequency catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70(2):218–23.
Kovoor P, et al. Risk to patients from radiation associated with radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1998;98(15):1534–40.
Macle L, et al. Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26(1 Pt 2):288–91.
Lickfett L, et al. Radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004;110(19):3003–10.
Ector J, et al. Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(3):234–42.
Chen J, et al. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(9):702–11.
Khaykin Y, et al. CARTO-guided vs. NavX-guided pulmonary vein antrum isolation and pulmonary vein antrum isolation performed without 3-D mapping: effect of the 3-D mapping system on procedure duration and fluoroscopy time. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011;30(3):233–40.
Stabile G, et al. Reduced fluoroscopy exposure during ablation of atrial fibrillation using a novel electroanatomical navigation system: a multicentre experience. Europace. 2012;14(1):60–5.
De Ponti R, et al. Simulator training reduces radiation exposure and improves trainees’ performance in placing electrophysiologic catheters during patient-based procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(8):1280–5.
Kleemann T, et al. Development of radiation exposure in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation in Germany between 2007 and 2014: great potential to minimize radiation dosage. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(10):858–64.
Steven D, et al. Reduced fluoroscopy during atrial fibrillation ablation: benefits of robotic guided navigation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(1):6–12.
Weiss JP, et al. A comparison of remote magnetic irrigated tip ablation versus manual catheter irrigated tip catheter ablation with and without force sensing feedback. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(Suppl 1):S5–S10.
Dragusin O, et al. Evaluation of a radiation protection cabin for invasive electrophysiological procedures. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(2):183–9.
Reddy VY, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(11):1644–53.
Bulava A, Hanis J, Eisenberger M. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using zero-fluoroscopy technique: a randomized trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38(7):797–806.
Cochet H, et al. Atrial structure and function 5 years after successful ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: an MRI study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(7):671–9.
Gibson DN, et al. Stiff left atrial syndrome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: clinical characterization, prevalence, and predictors. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(9):1364–71.
Shoemaker MB, et al. Left atrial hypertension after repeated catheter ablations for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(19):1918–9.
Welch TD, et al. Symptomatic pulmonary hypertension with giant left atrial v waves after surgical maze procedures: evaluation by comprehensive hemodynamic catheterization. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(12):1839–42.
Witt C, et al. Recurrent dyspnea following multiple ablations for atrial fibrillation explained by the “stiff left atrial syndrome”. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(5):E747–9.
Pilote L, et al. Stiff left atrial syndrome. Can J Cardiol. 1988;4(6):255–7.
Khurram IM, et al. Association between left atrial stiffness index and atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing left atrial ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(3)
Kosiuk J, et al. Prevalence and predictors of worsened left ventricular diastolic dysfunction after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(4):3613–5.
Ghanbari H, et al. Mortality and cerebrovascular events after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(9):1503–11.
Scherr D, et al. Incidence and predictors of left atrial thrombus prior to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(4):379–84.
Liu Y, et al. Incidence and outcomes of cerebrovascular events complicating catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2016;18(9):1357–65.
Noseworthy PA, et al. Risk of stroke after catheter ablation versus cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: a propensity-matched study of 24,244 patients. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(6):1154–61.
Patel D, et al. Long-term functional and neurocognitive recovery in patients who had an acute cerebrovascular event secondary to catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(4):412–7.
Kochhauser S, et al. Comparison of outcomes after cardioversion or atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with differing periprocedural anticoagulation regimens. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(12):1541–6.
Kosiuk J, et al. Early cerebral thromboembolic complications after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: incidence, characteristics, and risk factors. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(11):1934–40.
Abhishek F, et al. Effectiveness of a strategy to reduce major vascular complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011;30(3):211–5.
Aldhoon B, et al. Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a high-volume centre with the use of intracardiac echocardiography. Europace. 2013;15(1):24–32.
Mugnai G, et al. Complications in the setting of percutaneous atrial fibrillation ablation using radiofrequency and cryoballoon techniques: a single-center study in a large cohort of patients. Int J Cardiol. 2015;196:42–9.
Murakawa Y, et al. Nationwide survey of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Japanese catheter ablation registry of atrial fibrillation (J-CARAF)-a report on periprocedural oral anticoagulants. J Arrhythm. 2015;31(1):29–32.
Palaniswamy C, et al. Catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: ten-year trends in utilization, in-hospital complications, and in-hospital mortality in the United States. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(11):2056–63.
Peichl P, et al. Complications of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a single-center experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(4):684–90.
Waigand J, et al. Percutaneous treatment of pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulas after invasive vascular procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;47(2):157–64.
Lakkireddy D, et al. Feasibility and safety of uninterrupted rivaroxaban for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(10):982–8.
Tanaka-Esposito CC, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance reduces total and major vascular complications in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antral isolation on therapeutic warfarin. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013;37(2):163–8.
Errahmouni A, et al. Ultrasound-guided venous puncture in electrophysiological procedures: a safe method, rapidly learned. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(8):1023–8.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of Jun Dong, MD, PhD; Kan Fang, MD; and Mark Fellman at the Division of Cardiovascular Devices, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) during the preparation of this document. This document does not necessarily represent the opinions, policies, or recommendations of the FDA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Developed in partnership with and endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Society of Cardiac Stimulation and Electrophysiology (Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología [SOLAECE]). Developed in collaboration with and endorsed by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS), and the Brazilian Society of Cardiac Arrhythmias (Sociedade Brasileira de Arritmias Cardíacas [SOBRAC]).
Gerhard Hindricks, Josep Brugada, John Camm, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, N.M.S. (Natasja) de Groot, Luigi Di Biase, Mattias Duytschaever, Sabine Ernst, Michel Haissaguerre, Josef Kautzner, Hans Kottkamp, Karl Heinz Kuck, Evgeny Pokushalov, Richard Schilling and Claudio Tondo are the Representative of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)
Gregory F. Michaud is the Representative of the American Heart Association (AHA)
Eduardo B. Saad, Luis Aguinaga, Guilherme Fenelon and Mauricio Scanavacca are the Representative of the Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLAECE)
Young-Hoon Kim, Shih-Ann Chen, Jonathan M. Kalman, Koichiro Kumagai and Hsuan-Ming Tsao are the Representative of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)
Anne B. Curtis is the Representative of the American College of Cardiology (ACC)
Riccardo Cappato, D. Wyn Davies and Thorsten Lewalter are the Representative of the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS)
Vinay Badhwar, James R. Edgerton and Richard Lee are the Representative of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)
Laurent Macle is the Representative of the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS)
Ken Okumura and Teiichi Yamane are the Representative of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS)
André d’Avila is the Representative of the Sociedade Brasileira de Arritmias Cardíacas (SOBRAC)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Calkins, H., Hindricks, G., Cappato, R. et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 50, 1–55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-017-0277-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-017-0277-z