Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The comparative morpheme in Modern Japanese: looking at the core from ‘outside’

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Japanese differs from languages like English in that it (usually) has no overt comparative morphology like the English -er/more. However, in Modern Japanese yori can be used as the equivalent of the English comparative morpheme more in limited environments. (It is often assumed that the comparative morpheme yori developed due to the necessity for translation of comparative sentences written in European languages.) The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of the comparative morpheme in Modern Japanese and to consider what its existence tells us about the semantics of ‘regular’ Japanese comparatives. I argue that in Japanese the comparative morpheme for pure comparison is used in a supplementary way in that it can only be used when a given sentence cannot otherwise express a meaning of comparison. I also argue, building on the idea of selection in Kennedy (Standards of comparison. Handout from Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris, 2007a), that the comparative morpheme yori implicitly selects a standard yori PP (that has a meaning of comparison) at LF. We will also observe that there are native speakers who use the comparative morpheme yori freely as an intensifier meaning ‘still more’, and I argue that the development of the intensification use can be viewed as another strategy of avoiding the violation of the constraint: do not use a comparative morpheme for pure comparison if it is not necessary. Various proposals have been made regarding where the meaning of comparison is encoded in regular Japanese comparatives: a null comparative morpheme, a standard marker, or a gradable predicate. This paper argues that the development of the comparative morpheme for pure comparison and its ‘supplemental’ nature provide supportive evidence for the view that the standard marker expresses a meaning of comparison (e.g., Kennedy 2007a; Hayashishita, J East Asian Linguist 18:65–100, 2009; Schwarzschild, “Incomplete” comparatives. Paper presented at MIT workshop on comparatives, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alrenga, Peter, Christopher Kennedy, and Jason Merchant. To appear. A new standard of comparison. In Proceedings of the 30th west coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL).

  • Asahi Newspaper Database. 2011. Accessed 28 September 2011 from http://database.asahi.com/library2/main/start.php.

  • Barker, Chris. 2007. Parasitic scope. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 407–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, Renate, and Theo Vennemann. 1972. The grammar of relative adjectives and comparison. Linguistische Berichte 20: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Sigrid, Toshiko Oda, and Koji Sugisaki. 2004. Parametric variation in the semantics of comparison: Japanese vs. English. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 289–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, Rajesh, and Shoichi Takahashi. 2011. Reduced and unreduced phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(3): 581–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structures of words. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Jill. 1987. Particles borrowed from Spanish as discourse markers in Mayan languages. Anthropological Linguistics 29: 507–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Lyle. 2004. Historical linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M.J. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. Barbara H. Partee, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujibayashi, Fuzan. 1812. Oranda Gohokai [Descriptive grammar of Dutch]. Kyoto, gojoobashidoorisakaimachi (kooto): Zuihoodoo. (Reprinted in Akira, Muramatsu, and Toosaku Furuta (eds.). 2000. Oranda Bunpoosyo syuusei, dai 5 kan [The collection of Dutch grammar books, vol. 5]. Tokyo: Yumani Syobo.)

  • Google Japan Database. 2011. Accessed 28 September 2011 from http://www.google.co.jp/.

  • Harris, Alice C., and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashishita, J.-R. 2009. Yori-comparatives: A reply to Beck et al. (2004). Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18: 65–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Jeffrey. 1978. Linguistic diffusion in Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms., University of Texas at Austin.

  • Hida, Yoshifumi. 2002a. Gendai nihongo no kigen [The origin of Modern Japanese]. In Gendai nihongo kooza, vol. 4 [The lectures on Modern Japanese], ed. Yoshifumi Hida and Takeshi Sato, 70–103. Tokyo: Meiji Syoin.

  • Hida, Yoshifumi. 2002b. Meiji umare no nohongo [The Japanese language born in the Meiji Era]. Kyoto: Dankosya.

  • Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, Yasuo. 1991. Operators and empty categories in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Ito, Haku. 1995. Manyoshu syakuchu ichi (Explanatory notes of Manyoshu, volume I). Tokyo: Shueisya.

  • Ito, Haku. 1996a. Manyoshu syakuchu ni (Explanatory notes of Manyoshu, volume II). Tokyo: Shueisya.

  • Ito, Haku. 1996b. Manyoshu syakuchu san (Explanatory notes of Manyoshu, volume III). Tokyo: Shueisya.

  • Ito, Haku. 1997. Manyoshu syakuchu nana (Explanatory notes of Manyoshu, volume VII). Tokyo: Shueisya.

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2007a. Standards of comparison. Handout from Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris.

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2007b. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2009. Modes of comparison. In Papers from the 43rd annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. Malcolm Elliot, James Kirby, Osamu Sawada, Eleni Staraki, and Suwon Yoon, 141–165. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher, and Beth Levin. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse, ed. Louise McNally, and Christopher Kennedy, 156–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher, and Louise McNally. 2005. Scalar structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2): 345–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher, and Jason Stanley. 2009. On ‘average’. Mind 118: 583–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi, Akira. 1987. Comparative deletion in Japanese. Ms., Yamagata University.

  • Kikuchi, Akira. 2006. On the interpretation of measure phrases in English and Japanese. In Proceedings of LP 2002, ed. Shosuke Haraguchi, Osamu Fujimura, and Bohumil Palek, 971–980. Prague: Charles University, The Karilinum Press.

  • Kitahara, Yasuo et al. 1981. Nihon bunpoo jiten [Encyclopedia of Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Yuseido.

  • Kubota, Yusuke. 2011. Phrasal comparatives in Japanese: A measure function-based analysis. In Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 8, ed. Oliver Bonami and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr, 267–286.

  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. An overview of Uto-Aztecan grammar. Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Samuel. 1988. A reference grammar of Japanese. Rutland: Tuttle Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsui, Ai, and Yusuke Kubota. 2012. Comparatives and contrastiveness: Semantics and pragmatics of Japanese hoo comparatives. In Proceedings of formal approaches to Japanese linguistics 5, 126–139.

  • Nakanishi, Kimiko. 2007. Formal properties of measurement constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakada, Norio, Toshimasa Wada, and Yasuo Kitahara (eds.). 1983. Kogo Daijiten [Comprehensive dictionary of Old Japanese]. Tokyo: Syogakkan.

  • Nikkei Telecon Database. 2011. Accessed 28 September 2011 from http://t21.nikkei.co.jp/g3/CMN0F12.do.

  • Oda, Toshiko. 2008. Degree constructions in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Otsuki, Fumihiko. 1935. Daigenkai. Tokyo: Fuzanbo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawada, Osamu, and Thomas Grano. 2011. Scale structure, coercion and the interpretation of measure phrases in Japanese. Natural Language Semantics 19(2): 191–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, Roger. 2005. Measure phrases as modifiers of adjectives. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 34: 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, Roger. 2008. The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistic Compass 2: 308–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, Roger. 2010. “Incomplete” comparatives. Paper presented at MIT workshop on comparatives.

  • Shimoyama, Junko. 2011. Reassessing crosslinguistic variation in clausal comparatives. Natural Language Semantics 20(1): 83–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, William, Kenneth Wexler, and Dolon Das. 1995. The syntactic representation of degree and quantity: Perspectives from Japanese and child English. In Proceedings of the thirteenth west coast conference on formal linguistics XIII, ed. R. Aranovich, 581–596. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudo, Yasutada. 2009. Invisible degree nominals in Japanese clausal comparatives. In Proceedings of the 5th workshop on Altaic in formal linguistics (WAFL5), ed. Reiko Vermeulen and Ryosuke Shibagaki, MIT working paper in linguistics 58, 285–295. Cambridge: MITWPL.

  • Tokyo Shinbun Newspaper Database. 2011. Accessed 28 September 2011 from http://ace.cnc.ne.jp/cgi-bin/GU101.

  • Ueyama, Ayumi. 2004. Nihongo no hikakukoubun ni tsuite no ichi-koosatsu [Notes on the syntactic/semantic properties of comparative constructions in Japanese]. Bungaku kenkyuu [Studies in literature] vol. 101: 45–67. Fukuoka: Kyushu University.

  • Ultan, Russell, 1972. Some features of basic comparative construction. Working papers on language universals 9, 117–162. Stanford: Stanford Language Universals Project.

  • von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Humanities, Mie University, 1577 Kurimamachiya-cho, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan

    Osamu Sawada

Authors
  1. Osamu Sawada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osamu Sawada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sawada, O. The comparative morpheme in Modern Japanese: looking at the core from ‘outside’. J East Asian Linguist 22, 217–260 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-013-9104-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-013-9104-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation