Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (1984). Dictionary of sociology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Google Scholar
Adams, C. (1990). The sexual politics of meat. New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Balzer, P., Rippe, K. P., & Schaber, P. (2000). Two concepts of dignity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,
13(1/2), 7–27.
Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1997). Postmodernity and its discontents. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review,
19(1), 3–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Bos, J., Bovenkerk, B., & Feindt, P. Does PLF objectify animals? (Unpublished paper).
Bovenkerk, B. (2016). Animal captivity: Justifications for animal captivity in the context of domestication. In B. Bovenkerk & J. Keulartz (Eds.), Animal ethics in the age of humans: Blurring boundaries in human–animal relationships (pp. 151–172). Dordrecht: Springer.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Bovenkerk, B. (2012). The biotechnology debate: Democracy in the face of intractable disagreement. Dordrecht: Springer.
Book
Google Scholar
Bovenkerk, B., Brom, F. W. A., & van den Bergh, B. J. (2002). Brave new birds: The use of ‘Animal Integrity’ in animal ethics. The Hastings Center Report, 32(1), 16.
Article
Google Scholar
Bovenkerk, B., & Meijboom, F. (2013). Fish welfare in aquaculture: Explicating the chain of interactions between science and ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,
26(1), 41–61.
Article
Google Scholar
Bovenkerk, B., & Meijboom, F. L. B. (2012). The moral status of fish. The importance and limitations of a fundamental discussion for practical ethical questions in fish farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,
25(6), 843–860.
Article
Google Scholar
Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research,
8(1), 137–152.
Article
Google Scholar
Brom, F. W. A. (1997). Onherstelbaar verbeterd (irrepairably improved). Assen: Van Gorcum.
Google Scholar
Budiansky, F. (1992). The covenant of the wild: Why animals choose domestication. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Chan, S. (2009). Should we enhance animals? Journal of Medical Ethics,
35(11), 678–683.
Article
Google Scholar
Collins, S., Forkman, B., Kristensen, H., Sandøe, P., & Hockinga, P. (2011). Investigating the importance of vision in poultry: Comparing the behaviour of blind and sighted chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
133, 60–69.
Article
Google Scholar
Cronon, W. (1996). The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History,
1(1), 7–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Dabrock, P. (2009). Playing God? Synthetic biology as a theological and ethical challenge. Systems and Synthetic Biology,
3, 47–54.
Article
Google Scholar
DeGrazia, D. (2008). Moral status as a matter of degree. Southern Journal of Philosophy,
XLVI(2), 181–198.
Article
Google Scholar
Deckers, J. (2013). Paper presented at the preconference meeting at EurSafe. Uppsala, September.
De Vries, R. (2006). Genetic engineering and the integrity of animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,
19(5), 469–493.
Article
Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council. (1992). FAWC updates the five freedoms. Veterinary Record,
17, 357.
Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry,
12(2), 219–245.
Article
Google Scholar
Francione, G. (2012). “Pets”: The inherent problems of domestication. http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/pets-the-inherent-problems-of-domestication/#UaMlSKJJM08.
Frankena, W. K. (1939). The naturalistic fallacy. Mind,
48(192), 464–477.
Article
Google Scholar
Fraser, D. (2003). Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: The interplay of science and values. Animal Welfare,
12, 433–443.
Google Scholar
Harfeld, J. L., Cornou, C., Kornum, A., & Gjerris, M. (2016). Seeing the animal: On the ethical implications of de-animalization in intensive animal production systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,
29, 407–423.
Article
Google Scholar
Holland, A., & Johnson, A. (2012). Animal biotechnology and ethics. Dordrecht: Springer.
Google Scholar
Holtug, N. (2015). The value of coming into existence. In T. Visak & R. Garner (Eds.), The ethics of killing animals (pp. 101–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R. (2006). Applying Virtue Ethics to Our Treatment of the Other Animals. In J. Welchman (Ed.), The practice of virtue: Classic and contemporary readings in virtue ethics (pp. 136–155). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
Katz, E. (1992). The big lie. Human restoration of nature. Research in Philosophy and Technology, 12, 231–241.
Lynas, M. (2011). Geo-engineering, nuclear power and climate change: Playing God is good for the planet. The Telegraph.
MacNaghten, P. (2004). Animals in their nature: A case study on public attitudes to animals, genetic modification, and ‘nature’. Sociology,
38(3), 533–551.
Article
Google Scholar
McKibben, B. (1989). The end of nature. New York: Random House.
Google Scholar
Molewijk, B., Stiggelbout, A. M., Otten, W., Dupuis, H. M., & Kievit, J. (2004). Empirical data and moral theory: A plea for integrated empirical ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy,
7, 55–69.
Article
Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1922). Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Nijland, H. J. (2016). Disentangling the domestic contract—Understanding the everyday-life construction of acceptability—Or non-acceptability—Of keeping and killing animals for food. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Nijland, H. J., Aarts, N. M. C., & Renes, R. J. (2010). Frames and ambivalence in context: An analysis of hands-on experts’ perception of the welfare of animals in traveling circuses in The Netherlands. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,
26, 523–535.
Article
Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2015). Ideas about naturalness in public and political debates about science, technology and medicine. Review of Nuffield Council on Bioethics Reports.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs,
24(4), 249–291.
Article
Google Scholar
Ortiz, S. E. G. (2004). Beyond welfare: Animal integrity, animal dignity, and genetic engineering. Ethics & the Environment,
9(1), 94–120.
Article
Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1986). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Palmer, C. (2012). Does breeding a bulldog harm it? Breeding, ethics, and harm to animals. Animal Welfare,
21, 157–166.
Article
Google Scholar
Palmer, C. (2011). Animal disenhancement and the non-identity problem: A response to thompson. NanoEthics,
5, 43–48.
Article
Google Scholar
Palmer, C. (2010). Animal ethics in context. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar
Palmer, C. (1997). The idea of the domesticated animal contract. Environmental Values,
6(4), 411–425.
Article
Google Scholar
Persson, K., & Shaw, D. (2015). Empirical methods in animal ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,
28(5), 853–866.
Article
Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Regan, T. (2003). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Reynolds, T. J., Dethloff, C., & Westberg, S. J. (2001). Advancements in laddering. In T. J. Reynolds & J. C. Olson (Eds.), Understanding consumer decision making: The means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Robert, J. S., & Baylis, F. (2003). Crossing species boundaries. The American Journal of Bioethics,
3, 1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Roeser, S. (2006). The role of emotions in judging the moral acceptability of risks. Safety Science,
44, 689–700.
Article
Google Scholar
Rollin, B. (1995). The Frankenstein syndrome: Ethical and social issues in the genetic engineering of animals. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Rutgers, L. J. E., & Heeger, F. R. (1999). Inherent worth and respect for animal integrity. In M. Dol et al. (Eds.), Recognizing the intrinsic value of animals: Beyond animal welfare. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Google Scholar
Rutgers, L. J. E., Grommers, F. J., & Wijsmuller, J. M. (1995). Welzijn-intrinsieke waarde-integriteit. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde,
120, 490–494.
Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Google Scholar
Shriver, A. (2009). Knocking out pain in livestock: Can technology succeed where morality has stalled? Neuroethics,
2(3), 115–124.
Article
Google Scholar
Soper, K. (1995). What is nature? Culture, politics and the non-human. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Stone, C. (2010). Should trees have standing? Law, morality and the environment (3rd ed.). (original edition: 1972). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swierstra, T. (2003). De wisselwerking tussen ethiek en technologie. In I. Devisch & G. Verschraegen (Eds.), De verleiding van de ethiek: Over de plaats van morele argumenten in de huidige maatschappij (pp. 154–171). Amsterdam: Boom.
Google Scholar
Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.
Google Scholar
Thompson, P. (2008). The opposite of human enhancement: Nanotechnology and the blind chicken problem. NanoEthics,
2, 305–316.
Article
Google Scholar
Thompson, P. (2007). Food biotechnology in ethical perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Google Scholar
Van den Belt, H. (2009). Playing God in Frankenstein’s footsteps: Synthetic biology and the meaning of life. NanoEthics,
2, 257–268.
Article
Google Scholar
Van Haperen, P. F., Gremmen, B., & Jacobs, J. (2012). Reconstruction of the ethical debate on naturalness in discussions about plant-biotechnology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,
25(6), 797–812.
Article
Google Scholar
Višak, T. (2010). Do animals count for less? In C. M. R. Casabona, L. E. San Epifanio, & A. E. Cirion (Eds.), Global food security: Ethical and legal challenges (pp. 423–428). Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen.
Google Scholar
Vogel, S. (2015). Thinking like a mall. environmental philosophy after the end of nature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Walker, R. L. (2007). The good life for non-human animals: What virtue requires of humans. In R. L. Walker & P. J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Working virtue: Virtue ethics and contemporary moral problems (pp. 173–189). New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Yin, R. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.
Google Scholar
Zwart, H. (1997). De natuur als criterium voor medisch handelen? In: J. Keulartz & M. Korthals (eds.), Museum aarde: Natuur, criterium of constructie? (pp. 155–165). Amsterdam: Boom.
Zweers, W. (1995). Participeren aan de natuur: Ontwerp voor een ecologisering van het wereldbeeld. Utrecht: Van Arkel.
Google Scholar