Abstract
Genetic engineering evokes a number of objections that are not directed at the negative effects the technique might have on the health and welfare of the modified animals. The concept of animal integrity is often invoked to articulate these kind of objections. Moreover, in reaction to the advent of genetic engineering, the concept has been extended from the level of the individual animal to the level of the genome and of the species. However, the concept of animal integrity was not developed in the context of genetic engineering. Given this external origin, the aim of this paper is to critically examine the assumption that the concept of integrity, including its extensions to the level of the genome and the species, is suitable to articulate and justify moral objections more specifically directed at the genetic engineering of animals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attfield R. (1995). Value, Obligation and Meta-ethics. Amsterdam, Rodopi
de Boer I. J. M., Brom F. W. A., Vorstenbosch J. M. G. (1995). An Ethical Evaluation of Animal Biotechnology: The Case of Using Clones in Dairy Cattle Breeding. Animal Science 61:453–463
Bovenkerk B., Brom F. W. A., van den Bergh B. J. (2002). Brave New Birds. The Use of ‘animal integrity’ in Animal Ethics. Hastings Center Report 32:16–22
Brom F. W. A., Schroten E. (1993). Ethical Questions Around Animal Biotechnology. The Dutch Approach. Livestock Production Science 36:99–107
Burgess J. A., Walsh A. J. (1998). Is Genetic Engineering Wrong, per se? Journal of Value Inquiry 32:393–406
Comstock G. (2000). Vexing Nature. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers
Ghiselin M. T. (1974). A Radical Solution to the Species Problem. Systematic Zoology 23:534–544
Heeger F. R. (1997). Respect for animal integrity. In: Nordgren A. (eds), Science, Ethics, Sustainability. Uppsala, Uppsala University, pp. 243–252
Heeger, F. R. and F. W. A. Brom, “Beyond feeling well: our direct duties towards animals,” in Food safety, food quality and food ethics Preprints 3rd Congress of Eursafe (2001), pp. 270–273
Hull D. L. (1976). Are Species Really Individuals? Systematic Zoology 25:174–191
Kac E. (2000). GFP Bunny. In: Dobrila P. T., Kostic A. (eds), Eduardo Kac: Telepresence, Biotelematics, and Transgenic Art. Maribor, Kibla, pp. 101–131
Mauron A. (1989). Ethics and the Ordinary Molecular Biologist. In:W. R. Shea, B. Sitter (eds), Scientists and their Responsibility. Canton, Watson Publishing International
Mayr E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York, Columbia University Press
Mayr E. (1987). The Ontological Status of Species. Biology and Philosophy 2:145–166
Melin A. (2004). Genetic Engineering and the Moral Status of Non-human Species. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17:479–495
Musschenga A. W. (2002). Naturalness: Beyond Animal Welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15:171–186
Robert J. S., Baylis F. (2003). Crossing Species Boundaries. American Journal of Bioethics 3:1–13
Rollin B. (1995). The Frankenstein Syndrome. Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Rolston H. (1988). Environmental Ethics. Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia, Temple University Press
Rolston H. (2002). What Do We Mean by the Intrinsic Value and Integrity of Plants and Animals?. In: Heaf D., Wirtz J. (eds), Genetic Engineering and the Intrinsic Value and Integrity of Animals and Plants. Hafan, Ifgene, pp. 5–10
Rutgers, L. J. E., Het wel en wee der dieren (with a summary in English), PhD thesis, Utrecht University, 1993)
Rutgers L. J. E., Heeger F. R. (1999). Inherent Worth and Respect for Animal Integrity. In: Dol M. et al. (eds), Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Animals. Assen, van Gorcum, pp. 41–51
Rutgers L. J. E., Grommers F. J., Colenbrander B. (1996). Ethical Aspects of Invasive Reproduction Techniques in Farm Animals. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 31:651–655
Sandoe P., Holtug N., Simonsen H. B. (1996). Ethical Limits to Domestication. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9:114–122
Schroten E. (1998). The ‘Herman case’: The Usefulness of the Wide Reflective Equilibrium Model for Ethics Committees. In: van der Burg W., van Willigenburg T. (eds), Reflective Equilibrium. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 219–229
Taylor P. (1986). Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton, Princeton University Press
Vorstenbosch J. M. G. (1993). The Concept of Integrity. Its Significance for the Ethical Discussion on Biotechnology and Animals. Livestock Production Science 36:109–112
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Robert Heeger and Arno Wouters for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Vries, R. Genetic Engineering and the Integrity of Animals. J Agric Environ Ethics 19, 469–493 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-006-9004-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-006-9004-y