Abstract—
We have previously demonstrated the significance of endothelial cell-expressed α5β1 integrin in ischemic stroke, having shown that α5β1 integrin endothelial cell-selective knockout mice are significantly resistance to ischemic stroke injury via preservation of the tight junction protein claudin-5 and subsequent stabilization of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). In addition, inhibition of α5β1 by the small peptide noncompetitive integrin α5 inhibitor, ATN-161, is beneficial in a mouse model of ischemic stroke through reduction of infarct volume, edema, stabilization of the BBB, and reduced inflammation and immune cell infiltration into the brain. In continuation with our previous findings, we have further evaluated the mechanistic role of ATN-161 in vitro and found that oxygen and glucose deprivation and reperfusion (OGD/R)-induced inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial depolarization, and fibrosis attenuate tight junction integrity via induction of α5, NLRP3, p-FAK, and p-AKT signaling in mouse brain endothelial cells. ATN-161 treatment (10 µM) effectively inhibited OGD/R-induced extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition by reducing integrin α5, MMP-9, and fibronectin expression, as well as reducing oxidative stress by reducing mitochondrial superoxide radicals, intracellular ROS, inflammation by reducing NLRP3 inflammasome, tight junction loss by reducing claudin-5 and ZO-1 expression levels, mitochondrial damage by inhibiting mitochondrial depolarization, and apoptosis via regulation of p-FAK and p-AKT levels. Taken together, our results further support therapeutically targeting α5 integrin with ATN-161, a safe, well-tolerated, and clinically validated peptide, in ischemic stroke.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
INTRODUCTION
Ischemic stroke, a disruption of blood flow to a part of the brain most commonly due to a blood clot (thrombus) accounts for ~ 80% of all strokes and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and/or endovascular thrombectomy are currently used to treat acute ischemic stroke [1, 2]. Both treatments result in recanalization/reperfusion, which, although beneficial, can also result in so-called brain ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. A common cause of I/R injury is the rapid inflow of fluids following an acute/chronic occlusion of blood, nutrients, and oxygen to the tissue triggering the formation of free radicals. Ischemic stroke is followed by blood–brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction and vasogenic brain edema [3]. Structurally, tight junctions (TJs) between brain endothelial cells play an important role in maintaining the integrity of the BBB. I/R injury leads to an inflammatory response that triggers oxidative stress, cellular apoptosis, mitochondrial damage, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, with disruption of TJ integrity, and causes BBB breakdown and brain damage. However, the mechanism of I/R injury needs extensive investigation to identify effective therapies [4].
The integrin receptor family is a group of cell surface transmembrane glycoprotein receptors for the ECM composed of noncovalently bound α and β subunits and expressed throughout the body, including in the vasculature [5, 6]. Integrins play important roles in cell migration, cellular adhesion, and cellular survivability. One integrin family member, integrin α5β1, is of vital interest due to its increased expression in hypoxia and stroke models. We and other groups have previously shown that integrin α5β1 induction and its mediated downstream signaling play a critical role in the pathology of ischemic stroke and brain hypoxia [7,8,9,10].
Our laboratory has shown that endothelial cell-specific integrin α5β1 gene deficiency results in significant resistance to ischemic stroke injury in mice [11]. Furthermore, treatment with a novel α5β1 integrin inhibitor, the pentapeptide ATN-161, reduces neuroinflammation, stabilizes ECM remodeling and is neuroprotective in murine ischemic stroke and protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection in k18-hACE2 transgenic mice [12, 8]. To further elucidate ATN-161’s precise therapeutic mechanisms of action, we studied ATN-161 in an in vitro model of stroke, oxygen–glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) in brain endothelial cells. We found that ATN-161 effectively protected endothelial cells against OGD/R induced pathology by inhibiting oxidative stress, inflammation, collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), fibrosis, and tight junction loss via its mechanistic inhibition of α5β1 induced NLRP3 mediated FAK and AKT signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that inhibition of α5β1 integrin by ATN-161 is a promising novel target for the clinical treatment of ischemic stroke.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell Culture and Treatments
Mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells (bEnd.3) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were grown in high-glucose DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) in a 37 °C humidified incubator with 95% air and 5% CO2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Cells were cultured and multiplied in 75-cm2 culture flasks. Cells cultured in 6-well plates were used for western blotting and other cell assays. The cells were cultured in 8 well chamber slides for immunofluorescence staining. Cells were pretreated with freshly prepared ATN-161 (5, 10, 25, and 50 µM) (Medkoo Biosciences, Morrisville, NC, following the instructions of the manufacturer) 1 h before oxygen–glucose deprivation (OGD) and during OGD/reoxygenation (OGD/R).
OGD/R Treatment
OGD/R was induced in 70% confluent bEnd.3 cells by washing cells with fresh medium, which was then replaced with glucose-free DMEM and then incubation with 95% N2/5% CO2 for 6 h. Cells were then regluconated and reoxygenated by placing them in fresh normal DMEM and in an incubator with 95% air/5% CO2 (normoxia), respectively. Control cells were incubated with normal medium for 6 h, and replaced with normal medium with normoxic conditions in a manner identical to that for OGD/R [11, 13].
Mitochondrial Superoxide Estimation
MitoSOX was measured using the fluorogenic probe MitoSOX Red (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). In live cells, MitoSOX Red selectively enters mitochondria and emitted red fluorescence when oxidized by superoxide anions. After 6 h, OGD cells were switched to reoxygenation for 24 h and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C with MitoSOX Red (2.5 mmol/L). Cells were then washed with HBSS to remove excess dye, and fluorescence images were immediately captured using a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) under excitation wavelength 510 nm and emission wavelength 580 nm. MitoSOX Red fluorescence per cell was quantified by Image J analysis software (version 1.41; NIH) [14, 15].
Estimation of Intracellular ROS
Intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected using DCFDA/H2DCFDA. bEnd.3 cells were loaded with 20 μM DCFDA for 20 min at 37 °C and washed twice with HBSS. Fluorescence images were immediately captured using a ZOE fluorescent cell imager (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) under excitation wavelength 495 nm and emission wavelength 529 nm [16, 17]. DCFDA green fluorescence per cell was quantified by ImageJ analysis software (version 1.41; NIH).
Flow Cytometric Analysis for Oxidative Stress
Intracellular levels of ROS were further validated by staining the cells with DCFDA (Abcam, MA, USA) and analyzed with a Beckman Coulter Epics Galios flow cytometer with 2 lasers and 8 detectors running Galios software (v1) (Miami, FL, USA) and Kaluza software (version 1.3, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) will be used for post acquisition analysis. After OGD 6 h/reoxygenation 24 h, cells were washed with HBSS and loaded with 20 μM DCFDA for 20 min at 37 °C. Next, cells were trypsinized, resuspended, and placed on ice. DCFDA fluorescence was measured using a Beckman Coulter Epics Galios flow cytometer at an excitation/emission wavelengths of 488/540 nm, and data analyzed using the Galios software (v1).
Immunoblotting
The cells were lysed using RIPA buffer (VWR, Matsonford, PA), and protein concentration was measured using the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Protein samples (10 µg) were loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels (Bio-Rad Mini-PROTEAN TGX), electrophoresed at 90 V and transferred to PVDF membranes using the iBlot 2 dry blotting system (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). The membranes were blocked with the EveryBlot Blocking Buffer (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) for 15 min and probed with primary antibodies (listed in Supplementary Table 1) at 4 °C overnight. The membranes were washed thoroughly with PBS doped with 0.05% Tween© 20 and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (listed in Supplementary Table 1) for 1 h at room temperature. Lastly, the membranes were imaged using the ChemiDoc™ MP imaging system (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Densities of each band were normalized to those of β-actin or GAPDH, whereas phosphorylated proteins were normalized to those of total proteins and analyzed by Image J analysis software (version 1.41; NIH).
Immunocytochemistry
Immediately following OGD 6 h/reoxygenation 6 or 24 h with vehicle or ATN-161 treatment, the cells were fixed in 100% methanol, washed with PBS, and then incubated with peroxiabolish (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase. The cells were washed with PBS, blocked with Rodent M Block (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) for 15 min at room temperature, and then incubated with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 2) prepared in DaVinci diluent (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) overnight at 4 °C. The cells were then washed with PBS four times and incubated with Alexa Fluor 568 or 488 conjugated secondary antibodies (Supplementary Table 2) (Life Technologies; 1:400), for 45 min at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, cells were mounted using Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA). The images were obtained using a fluorescence microscope (TS2R, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The antibody fluorescence positive pixels per cell was quantified using ImageJ analysis software (version 1.41; NIH).
Apoptosis Analysis by Annexin V/PI Staining by Flow Cytometry
OGD/R-induced apoptosis and the effect of ATN-161 in bEnd.3 cells was determined using Annexin V assay. Cells were cultured in 6-well plates at a seeding density of 3.5 × 105 cells per well. After approximately 24 h, cells were subjected to OGD 6 h/reoxygenation 24 h with vehicle or ATN-161. After OGD 6 h/reoxygenation 24 h, cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) for 20 min at 37 °C. The cell population was sorted into live, early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic cells using Beckman Coulter Epics Galios flow cytometer with 2 lasers and 8 detectors running Galios software (v1) (Miami, FL, USA). The results were calculated as a percent of cells in late apoptosis.
Measurement of Mitochondrial Depolarization
bEnd.3 cells were subjected to OGD 6/reoxygenation 24 h and ATN-161 treatments as described above. Mitochondrial depolarization was assessed using a JC-1 assay kit (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). The cells were incubated in the dark upon JC-1 (10 μg/mL) treatment at 37 °C for 20 min, then washed thrice with HBSS and visualized using a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad, California, USA). The JC-1 monomer was photographed under excitation wavelength 460 nm and emission wavelength 530 nm, whereas the JC-1 polymer was photographed under excitation wavelength 520 nm and emission wavelength 590 nm. Cells exhibiting red (polymeric) fluorescence were considered to have normal mitochondria, while the cells were considered to have depolarized mitochondria if they exhibited green (monomeric) fluorescence.
TEM Assay
The bEnd.3 cells were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M phosphate buffer pH 7.4. The cells were scraped off and centrifuged to a pellet. The cells were embedded in 3% agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and put in the same fixative overnight at 4 °C. The cells were then rinsed four times in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2 containing 0.02 M glycine over a 12 h period. The samples were then post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 1 h in the dark, rinsed in deionized water three times, en bloc stained in 1% uranyl acetate in the dark for 1 h, rinsed in deionized water three times, dehydrated in gradient ethanol and propylene oxide twice, and then infiltrated in propylene oxide: Epon resin series for a 48 h period and embedded in Epon at 60 °C for another 48 h. Ultra-thin sections for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were cut on a Dupont Sorvall MT-2 microtome. TEM sections were mounted on carbon-coated copper grids (EMS FCF-150-CU), stained with 2% uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate, and the ultra-thin sections were visualized with a JEOL JEM-1400, 120-kV transmission electron microscope, and imaged with a Gatan digital camera [18].
Statistical Analysis
Data are demonstrated as the means ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, using GraphPad Prism 8.0. Data significance was determined as * or #p < 0.05, ** or ##p < 0.01, *** or ###p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Each experiment was repeated separately three times.
RESULTS
ATN-161 Treatment Inhibits OGD/R-induced Integrin α5 Receptor in bEnd.3 Cells
In the present study, we observed that bEnd3 cells subjected to 6 h of OGD followed by different reoxygenation time points showed increased expression of integrin α5 (Fig. 1A), with maximum levels of expression reached with OGD alone and OGD with 2–6 h post-reoxygenation (Fig. 1B (i–ii)). Hence, we further evaluated the effect of ATN-161 in bEnd3 cells subjected to 6 h of OGD, followed by up to 6 h of reoxygenation (normal glucose and normoxia; Fig. 1C). The cells were pretreated with vehicle or ATN-161 (5, 10, 25, and 50 µM) for 1 h before OGD and during OGD 6 h/6 h reoxygenation. As shown in Fig. 1D (i–ii), western blot analysis revealed that ATN-161 (10 µM) treatment significantly inhibited OGD 6 h/6 h reoxygenation induced α5 upregulation. Further, we measured the α5 cellular expression in bEND.3 cells upon OGD/R by immunofluorescence and the representative fluorescence images show highly induced α5 in OGD/R challenged cells compared to cells with vehicle or ATN-161 (10 µM) treatment (Fig. 1E (i–iii)). ATN-161 (10 µM) treatment significantly inhibits OGD/R induced α5 expression (Fig. 1E (iv–v)).
ATN-161 Protects OGD/R-induced NLRP3-mediated Inflammation in bEnd3 Cells
Since integrins play critical roles in the induction of inflammation [8, 19, 20], we next analyzed the NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein (NLRP) 3 inflammasome. Western blot analysis showed that OGD/R induces NLRP3 inflammasome expression levels in bEND.3 cells challenged with 6 h OGD and 24 h of reoxygenation compared with control cells (Fig. 2A (i–ii)). ATN-161 treatment significantly inhibits 6 h OGD/24 h reoxygenation induced NLRP3 upregulation (Fig. 2B (i–ii)). Immunofluorescence of NLRP3 in bEND.3 cells shows highly induced NLRP3 expression in OGD/R challenged cells compared to cells with vehicle or ATN-161 treatment (Fig. 2C (i–iii)). ATN-161 significantly reduced OGD/R induced NLPR3 inflammasome (Fig. 2C (iv)). The quantification of NLRP3 fluorescence per cell is presented in Fig. 2C (v).
OGD/R-induced Oxidative Stress Is Inhibited by ATN-161 Treatment in bEnd3 Cells
α5-induced NLRP3 inflammation generates oxidative stress [21]. Therefore, we further measured oxidative stress by estimation of mitochondrial superoxide radical and intracellular ROS in bEnd.3 cells. The cells were pretreated with vehicle or ATN-161 (10 µM) for 1 h before OGD and during OGD 6 h/24 h reoxygenation. Fluorescence microscopy of MitoSOX Red dye (which measures superoxide radicals) showed highly induced superoxide radicals production in OGD/R challenged cells compared to cells with vehicle or ATN-161 treatment (Fig. 3A (i–iii)), indicating that ATN-161 treatment significantly inhibits OGD/R induced superoxide production (Fig. 3A (iv–v)). Fluorescence images of intracellular ROS, as measured by DCFH2DA dye, showed highly induced intracellular ROS production in OGD/R challenged cells compared to cells with vehicle or ATN-161 treatment (Fig. 3B (i–iii)). ATN-161 treatment significantly inhibits OGD/R induced intracellular ROS production (Fig. 3B (iv–v)). This was further validated after OGD/R using DCFH2DA dye by flowcytometry. Induced intracellular ROS production in OGD/R-challenged cells was observed with high DCFH2DA-positive cells compared to vehicle or ATN-161 treatment. ATN-161 treatment significantly inhibited ROS production observed by peak shift compared to OGD/R challenged cells (Fig. 3C (i–ii)).
ATN-161 Protects Against OGD/R-induced Mitochondrial Damage and Apoptosis in bEnd3 Cells
As inflammation-induced oxidative stress affects mitochondrial health [22], we next analyzed mitochondrial morphology by TEM analysis. OGD/R-challenged cells showed an increase in mitochondrial size with vacuolations and disorganized cristae, whereas ATN-161 treated cells showed healthier mitochondria with organized cristae (Fig. 4A (i–iv)).
We further analyzed mitochondrial health by measuring the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in bEnd.3 cells upon OGD/R by fluorescence microscopy using the cationic fluorophore JC-1. We noted that more depolarized mitochondria were identified by green fluorescence in OGD/R-challenged cells compared to cells with vehicle or ATN-161 treatment (Fig. 4B (ix–xi)). ATN-161 treatment with OGD/R resulted in fewer depolarized mitochondria (Fig. 4B (xii–xiii)). Since mitochondrial depolarization induces apoptosis, this prompted us to measure apoptosis in bEnd.3 cells. Annexin V/PI-labeled bEnd.3 cells analyzed by flow cytometry show four quadrants (Fig. 4C (i–iv)) that represent necrotic cells (top left), cells in late apoptotic phase (top right), live cells (bottom left), and cells in early apoptotic phase (bottom right). OGD 6 h/24 h reoxygenation challenge resulted a significant increase in late apoptotic cells (Fig. 4C (i–iii)), whereas ATN-161 treatment significantly inhibited the cells undergoing apoptosis (Fig. 4C (iv, v)). Further, OGD 6 h/24 h reoxygenation challenge resulted in a slight increase of early apoptotic cells (p = 0.82) and necrotic cells (p = 0.23), whereas with ATN-161 (10 µM) treatment a slight decrease in OGD/R-induced early apoptotic (p = 0.38) and necrotic population was observed (p = 0.39). This effect may be due to inhibition of inflammation and oxidative stress.
ATN-161 Attenuates OGD/R-mediated p-FAK and p-AKT Signaling in bEnd3 Cells
α5β1 integrin regulates cell survival and proliferation signaling via phosphorylation of AKT and FAK [23, 24]. To understand the role of FAK and AKT signaling, the OGD/R-exposed bEnd.3 cell lysates at each time point were analyzed by western blotting using antibodies specific to phosphorylated forms of FAK and AKT. We determined that p-FAK was induced during OGD 6 h with reoxygenation at 24 h, whereas p-AKT levels were induced in OGD 6 h with reoxygenation at 18 h and 24 h compared with bEnd.3 cells maintained in normal condition (Fig. 5A (i) and C (i)). Protein levels were quantified by densitometry and normalized to total FAK/AKT (Fig. 5A (ii) and C (ii)). Furthermore, pretreatment with ATN-161 (10 µM) for 1 h before OGD and during OGD 6 h/24 h reoxygenation significantly inhibited p-FAK (Fig. 5B (i–ii)), while pretreatment with 5 and 10 µM ATN-161 also significantly inhibited OGD/R-induced p-AKT (Fig. 5D (i–ii)).
ATN-161 Inhibits OGD/R-induced Fibrosis in bEnd.3 Cells
α5 induces fibrosis and ECM deposition in stroke, hypoxia, and ischemia reoxygenation [8, 10, 25]. Hence, we further analyzed fibrosis in OGD/R-challenged bEnd.3 cells by estimation of fibronectin and MMP-9 levels. Fibronectin levels were significantly induced in 6 h OGD with 6 and 24 h reoxygenation (Fig. 6A (i–ii)). ATN-161 (10 µM) treatment significantly inhibits OGD/R-induced fibronectin upregulation (Fig. 6B (i–ii)). Immunofluorescence staining was measured for fibronectin and MMP-9 after OGD/R and representative fluorescence images show highly induced fibronectin and MMP-9 in OGD/R treated cells compared to cells with vehicle or ATN-161 treatment (Fig. 6C (i–iii) and D (i–iii)). ATN-161 treatment significantly inhibits OGD/R-induced fibronectin and MMP-9 cellular expression (Fig. 6C (iv–v) and D (iv–v)).
ATN-161 Inhibits OGD/R-induced Tight Junction Loss in bEnd3 Cells
α5β1-induced ECM deposition leads to BBB breakdown by tight junction protein loss in vivo [10, 26, 27]. Hence, we further analyzed the tight junction proteins claudin-5 and ZO-1 in OGD/R-treated bEnd.3 cell lysates collected from 6 h OGD followed by different reoxygenation time points and noted decreased expression of claudin-5 at 6 h OGD/6 h reoxygenation whereas ZO-1 loss was observed at various time points of reoxygenation compared with cells in normal condition (Fig. 7A (i–ii) and D (i–ii)). ATN-161 (10 µM) treatment significantly attenuates the OGD/R induced claudin-5 and ZO-1 tight junction proteins disruption (Fig. 7B (i–ii) and E (i–ii)). Immunofluorescence staining also confirmed that OGD/R reduces levels of tight junction proteins claudin-5 and ZO-1 at OGD/R compared to cells with vehicle or ATN-161 treatment (Fig. 7C (i–iii) and F (i–iii)) whereas ATN-161 treatment significantly inhibited OGD/R induced tight junction loss (Fig. 7C (iv–v) and F (iv–v)).
DISCUSSION
I/R injury leads to an inflammatory response that triggers oxidative stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial damage, ECM degradation, and disruption of tight junction integrity, which causes BBB breakdown and brain damage. Structurally, tight junctions between endothelial cells play an important role in maintaining the integrity of the BBB. The BBB comprises brain microvascular endothelial cells that interact with astrocytes, neurons, and pericytes [24, 28,29,30]. Hence, we used the mouse-derived BMVEC bEnd.3 cells in this study, a widely used in vitro model for brain endothelial cell signaling in BBB investigations [24, 31].
Recent basic and clinical studies have provided significant progress in our understanding of mechanisms operational in inflammation, oxidative stress, and associated tissue remodeling, including fibrosis, in stroke pathology. However, there remains a great need for a better mechanistic and therapeutic understanding of ECM signaling in I/R injury and stroke pathology. To date, the main therapies for stroke and I/R include tissue plasminogen activator and/or endovascular thrombectomy [1, 2, 32, 33] These treatments remove the blood vessel-obstructing thrombus but fail to impact secondary I/R that results from an influx of factors including calcium, cytokines, ROS, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that induce ECM degradation, leukocyte infiltration, and apoptotic cascades. [34, 35]. These processes destabilize the BBB. Although these therapies appear to be effective, not all patients are responsive to treatment. Our preclinical studies show an additional treatment strategy for I/R and stroke pathology using the small peptide ATN-161, which has been widely tested in clinical studies in cancer patients [36, 37]. Hence, we further aimed to investigate the mechanistic action of ATN-161 in bEnd.3 cells exposed to OGD/R.
Previous research by Donate et al. showed that ATN-161 exhibits a U-shaped dose response curve in vitro and where doses equivalent to 1–10 mg/kg produced the most significant reduction in activity (angiogenesis and tumor growth) [36]. Another study by Cianfrocca et al. demonstrated in their preclinical efficacy models that ATN-161 exhibited a U-shaped (inverted bell shape) dose–response curve. The study reported the results of a first-in-humans phase 1, dose escalation, pharmacokinetic study of thrice weekly i.v. ATN-161 in patients with advanced cancer. Patients were treated at doses ranging from 0.1 to 16 mg/kg [37]. Based on these previous researches, in our recent study, we used a concentration of ATN-161 (1 mg/kg) and it showed benefit following experimental ischemic stroke in mice [8]. However, additional stroke dose–response studies should be performed. Likewise, additional studies addressing ATN-161’s therapeutic window, and potential long-term effects, need to be conducted.
In the present study, we performed OGD/R in bEnd.3 cells to mimic I/R injury in vitro. We observed that (1) OGD/R-induced brain endothelial cell injury via induction of α5, accompanied by the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, (2) OGD/R-induced α5 and NLRP3-induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage, and apoptosis in bEnd.3 cells. (3) The OGD/R-induced stress responses further activated p-FAK and p-AKT, induced fibrosis by upregulation of fibronectin and MMP-9, and disruption of tight junctions; and (3) Inhibition of OGD/R induced α5 activation by treatment of bEnd.3 cells with ATN-161 prevented bEnd.3 damage by suppressing the up-regulation of α5, NLRP3, and further inhibited oxidative stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial damage, reduced fibrosis by inhibition of fibronectin and MMP-9 induction, and tight junction loss by restoration of claudin-5, and ZO-1, potentially via inhibition of phosphorylation of FAK and AKT proteins. Taken together, our results provide mechanistic evidence that endothelial cell damage is reduced by inhibiting the activation of α5 with ATN-161 during OGD/R.
Previous studies shown that α5β1 expression was highly upregulated in hypoxia and stroke models [8, 10, 25]. Our group previously showed that integrin α5β1 elimination in endothelial-specific knockout (α5β1-EC-KO) mice showed resistance to ischemic stroke injury via restoration of tight junction protein claudin-5 and exhibited minimal to no disruption of the BBB barrier [11]. In another study, we showed that α5β1 inhibition by ATN-161 in a mouse model of ischemic stroke is beneficial through reduction of brain α5β1 expression, BBB disruption, CD45+ leukocytes brain extravasation, edema, and fibrosis. In our present study, we similarly observed that OGD/R-induced α5β1 protein induction and cellular expression which could also be inhibited by ATN-161 treatment.
Inflammation is a critical mediator in I/R injury, and we previously observed that ATN-161 inhibits I/R-induced IL1β, CXCL12, and CD45+ leukocytes [8, 38,39,40]. In the present study, we observed that OGD/R induced NLRP3 inflammasome induction and cellular expression whereas ATN-161 significantly inhibited OGD/R induced NLRP3 inflammasome levels. Our result is in agreement with a previous study that showed that ATN-161 inhibits VEGF-induced retinal neovascularization in a mouse model by inhibiting integrin α5β1 and the NLRP3 inflammasome [41]. Another study by Mortimer et al. reported that RGD-binding integrin α5β1 is required for Entamoeba histolytica (Eh) to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome [42, 43].
Inflammation induces oxidative stress [44], and a previous report shows that α5β1 lentivirus transduction to rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells increase free radical nitric oxide production [45]. Here, we observed that OGD/R induced mitochondrial superoxide generation and intracellular ROS production where as ATN-161 significantly inhibited OGD/R induced superoxide radical and ROS production.
Mitochondria are an important source for ROS, mitochondrial metabolism generated electrons transport diverts to the formation of superoxide [46], and the production of ROS accompanied by changes in mitochondrial metabolism effects mitochondrial integrity and, depolarization and induce apoptosis [47, 48]. Therefore, we further analyzed mitochondrial integrity by TEM, which showed that OGD/R challenge resulted in disorganized cristae, with mitochondrial blebbing and vacuolization, whereas ATN-161 treatment effectively inhibited OGD/R induced mitochondrial blebbing, vacuolization, and the mitochondria observed with organized cristae. We next analyzed the mitochondrial depolarization by JC-1 immunofluorescence that showed OGD/R induced mitochondrial depolarization and ATN-161 treatment effectively rescued OGD/R induced mitochondrial depolarization. Furthermore, we measured cellular apoptosis by flow cytometry and found that OGD/R increased late apoptotic cell population, which could also be inhibited by ATN-161 treatment. This is in agreement with previous reports that have shown that anti-β1 antibodies and arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptide pretreatment decreased apoptosis in isolated pancreatic islets cells [49].
OGD/R-mediated integrin engagement induced inflammation, ROS, and mitochondrial membrane potential and triggered the signal transduction cascade that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and death [50]. This was analyzed by measuring the phosphorylation of FAK and AKT proteins that play a role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and death [24, 51, 52]. In the present study, we observed that OGD/R induced FAK, and AKT phosphorylation, which could be inhibited by ATN-161 treatment. In line with our observation, a previous study also demonstrated that OGD/R-induced phosphorylation of both FAK and AKT at a 24–72 h time point could be inhibited by α5 integrin-specific siRNA silencing in bEnd.3 cells [24].
α5β1 integrins are adhesion receptors for fibronectin and play a critical role in ECM deposition [10, 53]. In the current study, we measured the fibrosis by immunoblotting of fibronectin, which showed that OGD/R induced fibronectin protein expression, whereas ATN-161 significantly inhibited OGD/R-induced fibronectin expression. Similarly, OGD/R-induced cellular expression of fibronectin is also significantly inhibited by ATN-161 treatment in bEnd.3 cells. Fibronectin stimulates secretion of MMP-9 by integrin receptor α5β1, and the blockade of α5 abrogated the fibronectin-mediated stimulation of MMP-9 via inhibition of p-FAK [54]. Hence, we also measured cellular expression of MMP-9 protein by immunofluorescence and found that OGD/R induces MMP-9 levels, whereas ATN-161 treatment effectively inhibited MMP-9 levels in OGD/R induced bEnd.3 cells.
Previous studies showed that ischemic stroke, OGD/R, and hypoxia result in brain endothelial cell tight junction protein loss [8, 10, 13]. Another interesting study also demonstrated that α5β1/ZO-1 complex increases α5β1–fibronectin recruitment [55]. This further prompted us to measure the tight junction proteins claudin-5 and ZO-1 upon OGD/R treatment. Immunoblotting analysis showed downregulation of claudin-5 and ZO-1, whereas ATN-161 restored tight junction loss in bEnd.3 cells. Similarly, immunofluorescence analysis also showed that ATN-161 effectively restored cellular expression of OGD/R-induced claudin-5 and ZO-1 loss in bEnd.3 cells. The in vitro observation of tight junction proteins restoration upon ATN-161 treatment are in accordance with our previous observation showing that ATN-161 treatment restores ischemic stroke-induced loss of claudin-5 protein levels [8].
CONCLUSION
Our study identified that OGD/R induced inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial depolarization, and fibrosis mediated tight junction integrity, potentially via induction of integrin α5, NLRP3, p-FAK, and p-AKT signaling in mouse brain endothelial cells. ATN-161 treatment effectively inhibited OGD/R induced ECM deposition by reducing integrin α5, MMP-9 and fibronectin expression, oxidative stress by reducing mitochondrial super oxide radicles, and intracellular ROS, inflammation by reducing NLRP3 inflammasome, tight junction loss by restoring claudin-5 and ZO-1 expression levels, and mitochondrial damage by inhibiting mitochondrial depolarization and apoptosis via regulation of p-FAK and p-AKT levels, as summarized in Fig. 8. Taken together, our results suggest that inhibition of α5 integrin by ATN-161 is a promising novel target for the clinical treatment of ischemic stroke. Importantly, ATN-161 was safe and well-tolerated in several phase I and phase II clinical oncology studies, supporting its potential as a “shovel-ready” clinical stroke therapeutic.
Availability of Data and Material
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Albers, G.W., Goldstein, L.B., Hess, D.C., Wechsler, L.R., Furie, K.L., Gorelick, P.B., Hurn, P., Liebeskind, D.S., Nogueira, R.G., Saver, J.L. and STAIR VII Consortium. 2011. Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) recommendations for maximizing the use of intravenous thrombolytics and expanding treatment options with intra-arterial and neuroprotective therapies. Stroke 42 (9): 2645–2650.
Albers, G.W., M.P. Marks, S. Kemp, S. Christensen, J.P. Tsai, S. Ortega-Gutierrez, R.A. McTaggart, M.T. Torbey, M. Kim-Tenser, T. Leslie-Mazwi, and A. Sarraj. 2018. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. New England Journal of Medicine 378 (8): 708–718.
Alluri, H., C. Anasooya Shaji, M.L. Davis, and B. Tharakan. 2015. Oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation as an in vitro ischemia-reperfusion injury model for studying blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Journal of Visualized Experiments 99: e52699. https://doi.org/10.3791/52699.
Sun, M.S., H. Jin, X. Sun, S. Huang, F.L. Zhang, Z.N. Guo, and Y. Yang. 2018. Free Radical Damage in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: An Obstacle in Acute Ischemic Stroke after Revascularization Therapy. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3804979.
Pulous, F.E., and B.G. Petrich. 2019. Integrin-dependent regulation of the endothelial barrier. Tissue Barriers 7 (4): 1685844. https://doi.org/10.1080/21688370.2019.1685844.
van der Flier, A., K. Badu-Nkansah, C.A. Whittaker, D. Crowley, R.T. Bronson, A. Lacy-Hulbert, and R.O. Hynes. 2010. Endothelial α5 and αv integrins cooperate in remodeling of the vasculature during development. Development 137 (14): 2439–2449. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.049551.
Arimoto-Ishida, E., M. Sakata, K. Sawada, M. Nakayama, F. Nishimoto, S. Mabuchi, T. Takeda, T. Yamamoto, A. Isobe, Y. Okamoto, and E. Lengyel. 2009. Up-regulation of α5-integrin by E-cadherin loss in hypoxia and its key role in the migration of extravillous trophoblast cells during early implantation. Endocrinology 150 (9): 4306–4315. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2008-1662.
Edwards, D.N., K. Salmeron, D.E. Lukins, A.L. Trout, J.F. Fraser, and G.J. Bix. 2020. Integrin α5β1 inhibition by ATN-161 reduces neuroinflammation and is neuroprotective in ischemic stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 40 (8): 1695–1708.
Li, L., J. Welser-Alves, A. van der Flier, A. Boroujerdi, R.O. Hynes, and R. Milner. 2012. An angiogenic role for the α5β1 integrin in promoting endothelial cell proliferation during cerebral hypoxia. Experimental neurology 237 (1): 46–54.
Milner, R., S. Hung, B. Erokwu, P. Dore-Duffy, J.C. LaManna, and G.J. del Zoppo. 2008. Increased expression of fibronectin and the α5β1 integrin in angiogenic cerebral blood vessels of mice subject to hypobaric hypoxia. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 38 (1): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2008.01.013.
Roberts, J., L. de Hoog, and G.J. Bix. 2017. Mice deficient in endothelial α5 integrin are profoundly resistant to experimental ischemic stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 37 (1): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X15616979.
Narayanappa, Amruta Elizabeth B., Engler-Chiurazzi Isabel C., Murray-Brown Timothy E., Gressett Ifechukwude J., Biose Wesley H., Chastain Jaime B., Befeler Gregory, Bix (2021) In Vivo protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection by ATN-161 in k18-hACE2 transgenic mice. Life Sciences 284119881-10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119881
Nan, D., H. Jin, J. Deng, W. Yu, R. Liu, W. Sun, and Y. Huang. 2019. Cilostazol ameliorates ischemia/reperfusion-induced tight junction disruption in brain endothelial cells by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress. The FASEB Journal 33 (9): 10152–10164.
Kumar, K.H., A. Tamatam, A. Pal, and F. Khanum. 2013. Neuroprotective effects of Cyperus rotundus on SIN-1 induced nitric oxide generation and protein nitration: Ameliorative effect against apoptosis mediated neuronal cell damage. Neurotoxicology 34: 150–159.
Liao, L.X., M.B. Zhao, X. Dong, Y. Jiang, K.W. Zeng, and P.F. Tu. 2016. TDB protects vascular endothelial cells against oxygen-glucose deprivation/reperfusion-induced injury by targeting miR-34a to increase Bcl-2 expression. Scientific reports 6 (1): 1–13.
Venuprasad, M.P., K.H. Kumar, and F. Khanum. 2013. Neuroprotective effects of hydroalcoholic extract of Ocimum sanctum against H 2 O 2 induced neuronal cell damage in SH-SY5Y cells via its antioxidative defence mechanism. Neurochemical research 38 (10): 2190–2200.
Kumar, K.H., Venuprasad, M.P., Jayashree, G.V., Rachitha, P., Krupashree, K., Pal, A. and Khanum, F., 2015. Celastrus paniculatus Willd. mitigates t-BHP induced oxidative and apoptotic damage in C2C12 murine muscle cells. Cytotechnology 67(6):955–67.
Kumar, K.H., and F. Khanum. 2013. Hydroalcoholic extract of Cyperus rotundus ameliorates H 2 O 2-induced human neuronal cell damage via its anti-oxidative and anti-apoptotic machinery. Cellular and molecular neurobiology 33 (1): 5–17.
Mezu-Ndubuisi, O.J. and Maheshwari, A. 2020. The role of integrins in inflammation and angiogenesis. Pediatric research 1–8.
Park, E.J., Y. Yuki, H. Kiyono, and M. Shimaoka. 2015. Structural basis of blocking integrin activation and deactivation for anti-inflammation. Journal of biomedical science 22 (1): 1–9.
Al-Yafeai, Z., A. Yurdagul Jr., J.M. Peretik, M. Alfaidi, P.A. Murphy, and A.W. Orr. 2018. Endothelial FN (Fibronectin) deposition by α5β1 integrins drives atherogenic inflammation. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 38 (11): 2601–2614.
Sun, S., F. Hu, J. Wu, and S. Zhang. 2017. Cannabidiol attenuates OGD/R-induced damage by enhancing mitochondrial bioenergetics and modulating glucose metabolism via pentose-phosphate pathway in hippocampal neurons. Redox biology 11: 577–585.
Morozevich, G.E., N.I. Kozlova, N.A. Ushakova, M.E. Preobrazhenskaya, and A.E. Berman. 2012. Integrin α5β1 simultaneously controls EGFR-dependent proliferation and Akt-dependent pro-survival signaling in epidermoid carcinoma cells. Aging (Albany NY) 4 (5): 368–374. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100457.
Pang, D., L. Wang, J. Dong, X. Lai, Q. Huang, R. Milner, and L. Li. 2018. Integrin α5β1-Ang1/Tie2 receptor cross-talk regulates brain endothelial cell responses following cerebral ischemia. Experimental & molecular medicine 50 (9): 1–12.
Li, L., F. Liu, J.V. Welser-Alves, L.D. McCullough, and R. Milner. 2012. Upregulation of fibronectin and the α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins on blood vessels within the cerebral ischemic penumbra. Experimental neurology 233 (1): 283–291.
Baeten, K.M., and K. Akassoglou. 2011. Extracellular matrix and matrix receptors in blood–brain barrier formation and stroke. Developmental neurobiology 71 (11): 1018–1039. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20954.
Milner, R., S.J. Crocker, S. Hung, X. Wang, R.F. Frausto, and G.J. del Zoppo. 2007. Fibronectin-and vitronectin-induced microglial activation and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression is mediated by integrins α5β1 and αvβ5. The Journal of Immunology 178 (12): 8158–8167.
Gastfriend, B.D., S.P. Palecek, and E.V. Shusta. 2018. Modeling the blood–brain barrier: Beyond the endothelial cells. Current opinion in biomedical engineering 5: 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.11.002.
Roberts, J., M.P. Kahle, and G.J. Bix. 2012. Perlecan and the blood-brain barrier: Beneficial proteolysis? Frontiers in pharmacology 3: 155.
Tajes, M., E. Ramos-Fernández, X. Weng-Jiang, M. Bosch-Morato, B. Guivernau, A. Eraso-Pichot, B. Salvador, X. Fernandez-Busquets, J. Roquer, and F.J. Munoz. 2014. The blood-brain barrier: Structure, function and therapeutic approaches to cross it. Molecular membrane biology 31 (5): 152–167.
Watanabe, T., Dohgu, S., Takata, F., Nishioku, T., Nakashima, A., Futagami, K., Yamauchi, A. and Kataoka, Y. 2013. Paracellular barrier and tight junction protein expression in the immortalized brain endothelial cell lines bEND. 3, bEND. 5 and mouse brain endothelial cell 4. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 36(3):492–5.
Benjamin, E.J., S.S. Virani, C.W. Callaway, A.M. Chamberlain, A.R. Chang, S. Cheng, S.E. Chiuve, M. Cushman, F.N. Delling, R. Deo, and S.D. de Ferranti. 2018. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 137 (12): e67–e492.
Mendez, A.A., Samaniego, E.A., Sheth, S.A., Dandapat, S., Hasan, D.M., Limaye, K.S., Hindman, B.J., Derdeyn, C.P. and Ortega-Gutierrez, S., 2018. Update in the early management and reperfusion strategies of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Critical care research and practice 2018.
Sandoval, K.E., and K.A. Witt. 2008. Blood-brain barrier tight junction permeability and ischemic stroke. Neurobiology of disease 32 (2): 200–219.
Wang, Q., X.N. Tang, and M.A. Yenari. 2007. The inflammatory response in stroke. Journal of neuroimmunology 184 (1–2): 53–68.
Doñate, F., G.C. Parry, Y. Shaked, H. Hensley, X. Guan, I. Beck, Z. Tel-Tsur, M.L. Plunkett, M. Manuia, D.E. Shaw, and R.S. Kerbel. 2008. Pharmacology of the novel antiangiogenic peptide ATN-161 (Ac-PHSCN-NH2): Observation of a U-shaped dose-response curve in several preclinical models of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Clinical Cancer Research 14 (7): 2137–2144.
Cianfrocca, M.E., K.A. Kimmel, J. Gallo, T. Cardoso, M.M. Brown, G. Hudes, N. Lewis, L. Weiner, G.N. Lam, S.C. Brown, and D.E. Shaw. 2006. Phase 1 trial of the antiangiogenic peptide ATN-161 (Ac-PHSCN-NH 2), a beta integrin antagonist, in patients with solid tumours. British journal of cancer 94 (11): 1621–1626. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603171.
Amruta, N., Rahman, A., Pinteaux, E. and Bix, G. 2020. Neuroinflammation and fibrosis in stroke: the good, the bad and the ugly. Journal of Neuroimmunology 577318.
Narayanappa, A., Chastain, W.H., Paz, M., Solch, R.J., Murray-Brown, I.C., Befeler, J.B., Gressett, T.E., Longo, M.T., Engler-Chiurazzi, E.B. and Bix, G. 2021. SARS-CoV-2 mediated neuroinflammation and the impact of COVID-19 in neurological disorders. Cytokine & growth factor reviews.
Amruta, N., Engler-Chiurazzi, E.B., Murray-Brown, I.C., Gressett, T.E., Biose, I.J., Chastain, W.H. and Bix, G., 2021. In-vivo Protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection by ATN-161 in k18-hACE2 transgenic mice. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.443275.
Sui, A., Y. Zhong, A.M. Demetriades, Q. Lu, Y. Cai, Y. Gao, Y. Zhu, X. Shen, and B. Xie. 2018. Inhibition of integrin α5β1 ameliorates VEGF-induced retinal neovascularization and leakage by suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome signaling in a mouse model. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 256 (5): 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3940-x.
Mortimer, L., F. Moreau, S. Cornick, and K. Chadee. 2015. The NLRP3 Inflammasome Is a Pathogen Sensor for Invasive Entamoeba histolytica via Activation of alpha5beta1 Integrin at the Macrophage-Amebae Intercellular Junction. PLoS Pathogens 11 (5): e1004887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004887.
St-Pierre, J., F. Moreau, S. Cornick, J. Quach, S. Begum, and L. Aracely Fernandez. 2017. The macrophage cytoskeleton acts as a contact sensor upon interaction with Entamoeba histolytica to trigger IL-1beta secretion. PLoS Pathogens 13 (8): e1006592. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006592.
Kandikattu, H.K. 2018. Oxido-nitrosative stress and antioxidants in asthma. J Basic Clin Immonol 1: 9–12.
Chen, H.Y., L. Pan, H.L. Yang, P. Xia, W.C. Yu, W.Q. Tang, Y.X. Zhang, S.F. Chen, Y.Z. Xue, and L.X. Wang. 2018. Integrin alpha5beta1 suppresses rBMSCs anoikis and promotes nitric oxide production. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 99: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.038.
Boveris, A., N. Oshino, and B. Chance. 1972. The cellular production of hydrogen peroxide. Biochemical Journal 128 (3): 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1280617.
Nemoto, S., K. Takeda, Z.X. Yu, V.J. Ferrans, and T. Finkel. 2000. Role for mitochondrial oxidants as regulators of cellular metabolism. Molecular and cellular biology 20 (19): 7311–7318. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.20.19.7311-7318.2000.
Nicholls, D.G., and S.L. Budd. 2000. Mitochondria and neuronal survival. Physiological reviews 80 (1): 315–360. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2000.80.1.315.
Pinkse, G.G., W.P. Bouwman, R. Jiawan-Lalai, O.T. Terpstra, J.A. Bruijn, and E. de Heer. 2006. Integrin signaling via RGD peptides and anti-β1 antibodies confers resistance to apoptosis in islets of Langerhans. Diabetes 55 (2): 312–317. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db04-0195.
Werner, E., and Z. Werb. 2002. Integrins engage mitochondrial function for signal transduction by a mechanism dependent on Rho GTPases. The Journal of cell biology 158 (2): 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200111028.
Turečková, J., M. Vojtěchová, M. Krausová, E. Šloncová, and V. Korínek. 2009. Focal adhesion kinase functions as an akt downstream target in migration of colorectal cancer cells. Translational oncology 2 (4): 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1593/tlo.09160.
Caltagarone, J., Jing, Z. and Bowser, R. 2007. Focal adhesions regulate Aβ signaling and cell death in Alzheimer's disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Basis of Disease 1772(4):438–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.11.007.
Reed, N.I., Jo, H., Chen, C., Tsujino, K., Arnold, T.D., DeGrado, W.F. and Sheppard, D. 2015. The αvβ1 integrin plays a critical in vivo role in tissue fibrosis. Science translational medicine 7(288):288ra79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa5094.
Sen, T., A. Dutta, G. Maity, and A. Chatterjee. 2010. Fibronectin induces matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in human laryngeal carcinoma cells by involving multiple signaling pathways. Biochimie 92 (10): 1422–1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2010.07.005.
González-Tarragó, V., A. Elosegui-Artola, E. Bazellières, R. Oria, C. Pérez-González, and P. Roca-Cusachs. 2017. Binding of ZO-1 to α5β1 integrins regulates the mechanical properties of α5β1–fibronectin links. Molecular biology of the cell 28 (14): 1847–1852. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E17-01-0006.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Hemanth Kumar Kandikattu, Pulmonary Medicine, Tulane University, for technical help in experimental design and manuscript editing. Dr. Ying Xiao, Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, for TEM analysis. Authors are thankful to Alan Tucker, Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Core, Tulane University, for help in flow cytometry experiments. The authors are grateful to Dr. Abir Rahman, Dr. Ning Liu, Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane University, for technical help in experiments. The authors appreciate Isabel Murray-Brown, Wesley Chastain, Meshi Paz, Rebecca Solch, Department of Neurosurgery at Tulane University for assistance. The authors appreciate Loula Burton for help in English correction of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health R01 NS065842 (GB). This research was supported in whole or in part by the Louisiana Board of Regents Endowed Chairs for Eminent Scholars program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NA designed and performed experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. G.J.B. revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amruta, N., Bix, G. ATN-161 Ameliorates Ischemia/Reperfusion-induced Oxidative Stress, Fibro-inflammation, Mitochondrial damage, and Apoptosis-mediated Tight Junction Disruption in bEnd.3 Cells. Inflammation 44, 2377–2394 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-021-01509-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-021-01509-9