Abstract
Adaptation to different ecological niches is considered one of the main drivers of species diversification, also in cryptic species complexes, notwithstanding their morphological stasis. We here review all the published information on ecological differentiation within cryptic species complexes within the phylum Rotifera. We found 177 instances of cryptic species identified genetically, published in 101 papers. Only a subset of the papers contained available information on ecological differences and only for two of the 54 known complexes, namely Brachionus calyciflorus s.l. and Brachionus plicatilis s.l., sufficient data were available for analyses of ecological differences. For the B. calyciflorus complex, B. fernandoi consistently occurred at a significantly lower temperature than the other species in the complex; no differences were found for other environmental variables. For the B. plicatilis complex, B. paranguensis occurred in waters with higher pH than the other species; no differences were found for other environmental variables. These results, even if preliminary and based on scattered information, reveal that adaptation to different ecological niches exists also between closely related species. Our aim is to showcase this interesting field of research spurring further detailed studies to focus on the mechanisms of ecological speciation using rotifer cryptic species as a model system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Complexes of cryptic species are groups of taxa classified under one nominal species name due to their similar morphology even if there is evidence, mostly from DNA-based analyses, of them representing distinct evolutionary lineages (Bickford et al., 2007; Fišer et al., 2018; Struck et al., 2018). Species inhabit multidimensional niche spaces, which include species tolerances and requirements regarding environmental conditions, biotic interactions, and resource availability (Begon et al., 2006). Therefore, speciation is always associated with niche differentiation.
Studies focusing on cases of ecological speciation involving niche differentiation in sympatry (Coyne & Orr, 2004) reported spectacular cases of adaptive radiations in aquatic animals, for example, in whitefish in Switzerland (Bernatchez et al., 1999, 2010), cichlid fishes in Africa (Seehausen et al., 1999; Chapman et al., 2000; Seehausen, 2006), and amphipods in lake Baikal (Macdonald et al., 2005), with fast ecological and morphological differentiation between species. However, in cryptic species complexes, species retain their morphology in stasis, even when living in sympatry (Fišer et al., 2018). Ecological diversification could indeed evolve along niche axes (e.g. salinity, pH, or temperature) that are not related to morphology (Wiens & Graham, 2005; Losos, 2008; Wiens, 2011; Fišer et al., 2018).
In practice, scholars have revealed various niche differentiations involving a wide range of aquatic organisms. Luo et al. (2017) found the different species within the bloom-forming dinoflagellate Akashiwo sanguinea species complex bloom in different seasons, segregating in relation to distinct thermal optima. In crustaceans, Cheng et al. (2008) revealed that the estuarine copepod Acartia tonsa cryptic species complex comprises two clades living in contrasting salinity regimes, even if coexistence was observed in intermediate salinity conditions. Eisenring et al. (2016) investigated the habitat preference of the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum cryptic species complex and found that the occurrence of the two clades can be distinguished by different anthropogenic influences on river ecomorphology. In amphibians, Rissler & Apodaca (2007) discovered that the patterns of genetic divergence between species of the black salamander Aneides flavipunctatus cryptic species complex are strongly associated with divergence in the climatic niche. In fish, Shen et al. (2015) studied the three cryptic species within the flathead mullet Mugil cephalus complex and found spatio-temporal and behavioural segregation represented by spawning time and ground and philopatry differentiation.
Recent technological advances have allowed discerning boundaries of cryptic species using DNA taxonomy and also integrative approaches from various genetic markers and advanced morphological and ecological observations (Bickford et al., 2007; Padial et al., 2010; Fontaneto et al., 2015; Struck et al., 2018; Vyskočilová et al., 2018; de Sousa-Paula et al., 2021; Yeom et al., 2021). Amongst the groups of aquatic animals with the highest level of occurrence of cryptic species, there is the Phylum Rotifera (Fontaneto et al., 2009; Gabaldón et al., 2017; Korbachech et al., 2023). Rotifers are microscopic animals living in diverse habitats such as freshwater, brackish, marine environments, soil, mosses, lichens, and glaciers and represent excellent model organisms for studying ecological differentiation and species divergence (Serra & Fontaneto, 2017). Whilst historically considered to have a ubiquitous biogeographic distribution (Dumont, 1983; Fontaneto et al., 2012), DNA taxonomic analyses revealed the occurrence of cryptic species complexes that could mask geographically restricted taxa not distinguishable using morphology (Fontaneto, 2014; Papakostas et al., 2016; Gabaldón et al., 2017). Yet, rotifers are also known to be dispersed due to their long-surviving resting stages (Fontaneto, 2019); the existence of species within a complex with equal broad distribution of the complex itself (e.g. Fontaneto et al., 2008; Mills et al., 2017) implies that rotifer populations may not be geographically isolated. Thus, sympatric speciation may be a more likely scenario for rotifers rather than allopatric speciation (e.g. Papakostas et al., 2016; Michaloudi et al., 2018).
Co-occurrence of closely related species within cryptic species in rotifers revealed that species often coexist in the same location due to differentiated environmental factors (e.g. salinity, temperature) and/or biotic interactions (e.g. resource competition, predation) (Gabaldón et al., 2017), with fluctuations in both time and/or space. For instance, the occurrence of different species in the Ascomorpha ovalis complex is defined by altitude (García-Morales & Elías-Gutiérrez, 2013). Temperature limitations seem to be the factor defining species co-occurrence in the Brachionus calyciflorus species complex (Li et al., 2010; Xiang et al., 2010, 2011a, b; Wen et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018). These species typically succeed each other seasonally with overlap under intermediate temperatures. Within the Brachionus calyciflorus species complex, Brachionus calyciflorus s.s. Pallas, 1776 and Brachionus dorcas Gosse, 1851 occupy warmer niches (summer period) and Brachionus fernandoi Michaloudi, Papakostas, Stamou, Nedela, Tihlariková, Zhang & Declerck, 2018 is found in colder ones (Zhang et al., 2018). Other environmental parameters such as chlorophyll a concentration were also suggested to be differently exploited amongst the B. calyciflorus cryptic species (Li et al., 2010).
Overall, the best available information regarding the mechanisms that allow cryptic species coexistence comes from the Brachionus plicatilis complex (Gabaldón et al., 2017). The B. plicatilis complex comprises 15 species (Mills et al., 2017), of which six inhabit saline ponds in Spain (Gómez et al. 2002, 2007) and subsets of these six species commonly co-occur in the same habitat (Ortells et al., 2003; Gómez, 2005). According to information present for the species complex, when species differ in body size, niche differentiation is related to abiotic and biotic factors. Cryptic species characterized by different body sizes developed specialization to different microalgae species enhancing food partitioning and thus differential use of resources, promoting their coexistence (Ciros-Pérez et al., 2001). Predation was also found to be size dependent with smaller species being more vulnerable to predation (Lapesa et al., 2002, 2004; Ciros-Pérez et al., 2004). On the contrary, in case of species with almost identical body size, niche differentiation may be mediated by their different physiological responses to fluctuating environments, e.g. related to temperature, salinity, and oxygen concentration (Gabaldón et al., 2017; Serra & Fontaneto, 2017; Walczyńska & Serra, 2022), together with divergence in life-history traits related to diapause (Gabaldón et al., 2017).
In this study, we refer to the idea of niche differentiation sensu MacArthur (Walter, 1991), which refers to species dividing the available resources as a consequence of being limited by different biotic and abiotic factors. Our model organisms are the cryptic species complexes from Rotifera. We collected and reviewed all the available information on the environmental conditions behind the occurrence of sister species within cryptic species complexes in rotifers. Thus, our goal was to gain deeper insight into the ecological facets of cryptic diversity, focusing on the description of the patterns of ecological differences to allow future studies to get reliable data in order to eventually infer the processes involved in speciation, shaping biodiversity (Fišer et al. 2018; Marrone et al. 2023), analysing cryptic species complexes in rotifers as a rich and diverse test case.
Methods
A literature search was performed through academic databases, such as Web of Science, Scopus, Zoological Records, and Google Scholar, with keywords (rotifer* AND (cryptic OR DNA taxonomy OR sibling OR hidden)) and all the retrieved papers downloaded and analysed. We retained only papers dealing with Rotifera in the traditional meaning of the term, which includes Bdelloidea, Monogononta, and Seisonidea, but not the parasitic Acanthocephala (Sielaff et al., 2016). We set a temporal limit to the last 30 years, starting from the approximate period when the first cryptic species complexes were identified in rotifers (Fu et al., 1991a, b).
All retrieved papers were screened for the presence of data and/or analyses using genetic data to identify complexes of cryptic species in rotifers. Papers simply mentioning cryptic species complexes without using genetic analyses were not included in the dataset. For the complexes that have been resolved and are now considered complexes of pseudocryptic species (sensu Korshunova et al. (2017) and Struck et al. (2018)), distinguishable also from detailed morphological analyses, the identification of (pseudo)cryptic taxa within the complex was considered valid even in the absence of additional genetic data and analyses and the manuscripts considered for further screening. The only currently resolved cryptic species complexes in rotifers are Brachionus calyciflorus s.l., with four described species, B. calyciflorus s.s., B. dorcas, Brachionus elevatus Michaloudi, Papakostas, Stamou, Nedela, Tihlariková, Zhang & Declerck, 2018, and B. fernandoi according to Michaloudi et al. (2018), and Brachionus plicatilis s.l., with fifteen species, six of which are already described as Brachionus asplanchnoidis Charin, 1947, Brachionus ibericus Ciros-Pérez, Gómez & Serra, 2001, Brachionus manjavacas Fontaneto, Giordani, Melone & Serra, 2007, Brachionus paranguensis Guerrero-Jimenez, Vannucchi, Silva-Briano, Adabache-Ortiz, Rico-Martinez, Roberts, Neilson & Elias-Gutierrez, 2019, Brachionus plicatilis s.s. Müller, 1786, and Brachionus rotundiformis Tschugunoff, 1921, and other nine with only an informal name, according to Mills et al. (2017), Michaloudi et al. (2017) and Guerrero-Jiménez et al. (2019). The results of the literature screening were also compared with lists provided in the two most recent reviews on rotifer cryptic species (Gabaldón et al., 2017; Kordbacheh et al., 2023).
Searching through the papers that were kept by the first screening, reliably identifying cryptic species complexes, we marked whether ecological data and/or analyses were available regarding cryptic species and their differences within a complex. We considered as valid ecological metrics only those that contained measurements of abiotic limnological variables (e.g. water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, salinity), identification of habitat, biotic pressures (e.g. competition, predation), and lab experiments on food quality and quantity.
Focusing only on the two most studied cryptic species complexes, Brachionus calyciflorus s.l. and Brachionus plicatilis s.l., we further screened the retained papers and any other paper we had from the overall literature search to obtain actual raw data on environmental measurements for each species within the complexes, intending to describe the ‘niche’ of each cryptic species in the complex and compare whether the ecological requirements of each species could be narrower than those of the whole complex and if significant differences could exist between species within each complex. The rationale for the search was to gather data to perform quantitative analyses of convex hulls or hypervolumes (Blonder, 2018; Mammola et al., 2021), as already performed on rotifers (Jaturapruek et al., 2021), but not yet used to disentangle niche differentiation within cryptic species complexes. Unfortunately, due to the scattered and heterogeneous data that became available from the literature survey, we could not perform analyses on hypervolumes, but only for each variable separately. We kept only the variables that had available data for most of the species within a complex. We performed a series of ANalyses Of VAriance (ANOVA) tests with Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc tests to identify potential ecological differences between species within a complex using R v4.0.3 (R Core Team, 2022). Tukey HSD tests were performed with the default settings of the TukeyHSD function of the stats package v4.0.3. Model fit was checked with the R package performance v0.6.1 (Lüdecke et al., 2021): all models passed the assumptions of normality of residuals, absence of outliers, homoscedasticity, homogeneity of variance, and influential observations (Lüdecke et al., 2021).
Results
We found 177 instances of cryptic species in rotifers (Bdelloidea and Monogononta) identified with genetic data, published in 101 papers (Table 1, Supplementary Table S1). No analyses on Seisonidea were found. Overall, 6 taxa were not identified to the rank of species complex but remained at genus or family rank, whereas the other 171 instances belonged to 54 proper cryptic species complexes; the most frequently studied complexes were Brachionus plicatilis s.l., with 40 papers, and Brachionus calyciflorus s.l., with 33 papers.
From the 171 instances of 54 cryptic species complexes, only in 53 instances potential ecological differences between cryptic taxa within the same complex were analysed (Table 1). Amongst the potential ecological differences between cryptic species, environmental metrics (including limnological variables, fluctuating environments, etc.) were the mostly used ones (n = 37, mainly temperature and salinity), followed by habitat type (n = 6) and food quality and quantity (n = 5). Only occasionally differential responses to pollution (n = 3) and predation (n = 3) were included, with one study dealing with both.
The species with more data on ecological differences were B. plicatilis s.l. (n = 23) and B. calyciflorus s.l. (n = 17). All the previously mentioned ecological differences were studied, with special emphasis on salinity for B. plicatilis s.l. and temperature for B. calyciflorus s.l. The other cryptic species complexes, nine belonging to monogononta (Euchlanis dilatata s.l., Keratella cochlearis s.l., Lecane bulla s.l., Polyarthra dolichoptera s.l., Polyarthra remata s.l., Polyarthra vulgaris s.l., Synchaeta pectinata s.l., Synchaeta tremula s.l., and Testudinella clypeata s.l.) and three to bdelloids (Macrotrachela quadricornifera s.l., Rotaria rotatoria s.l., and Rotaria sordida s.l.), were included only in one or two studies each. No taxonomic identification is available for the cryptic species within the complexes. For these cryptic species complexes, no meta-analysis is possible at the moment, due to the lack of available data and taxonomic resolution. Amongst these cryptic species complexes, the only hint to a differential species-specific response to environmental features within a cryptic species complex seems to be related to phosphorus for the cryptic species of Synchaeta pectinata s.l. (Obertegger et al., 2014); none of the other studies was able to identify ecological differences between cryptic species within each complex.
Regarding B. calyciflorus s.l., we gathered 128 records mentioning ecological data for the complex (Supplementary Table S2), but only 40 records framed the taxonomic backbone of the study according to the currently accepted knowledge of four species in the complex, namely B. calyciflorus s.s., B. dorcas, B. elevatus, and B. fernandoi. For these data, only water temperature, pH, and chlorophyll a had enough measurements to compare variability within and between species within the complex (Fig. 1). No significant differences between species were revealed for pH (ANOVA: F3,30 = 2.54, P = 0.0751) and for chlorophyll a (F3,14 = 1.36, P = 0.2610), but water temperature seemed to be different between species (F3,30 = 27.33, P < 0.0001), with B. fernandoi being different from the other three species (Tukey test: P < 0.0001 for all pairwise comparison involving this species), always found at lower temperatures than the other species (Fig. 1).
Variability of environmental metrics (chlorophyll a, pH, and water temperature) in habitats where records of the B. calyciflorus species complex are available. Records are visualized for the four species in the complex and for the ones that used DNA taxonomy but did not manage to identify the four species, named ‘unidentified’. The actual values of the observations are overimposed on the boxplots as blue dots to show sample size
Regarding B. plicatilis s.l., we found 82 records mentioning ecological data for cryptic species in the complex (Supplementary Table S2), with 69 of them that framed the taxonomic backbone according to the currently accepted knowledge of fifteen species in the complex, including data for eleven of them. For these data, only water temperature, pH, and salinity had enough measurements to compare variability within and between species within the complex (Fig. 2). No significant differences between species were revealed for water temperature (ANOVA: F7,26 = 0.17, P = 0.9890) and salinity (F10,55 = 1.34, P = 0.2333), but pH seems to be different between species (F7,28 = 3.85, P = 0.0047), with B. paranguensis being different from most of the other species (Tukey test: P < 0.05 for pairwise comparisons with B. ‘Tiscar’, B. ibericus, B. plicatilis s.s., and B. rotundiformis but not with B. ‘Almenara’, B. asplanchnoidis, and B. ‘Turkana’), even if only two measurement exist for this species (Fig. 2). All the information on environmental parameters that accompanied the sampling of rotifers belonging to so far known rotifer species complexes, which could not be used for analyses due to too limited information per complex, was collected in Supplementary Table S3. This table contains nearly 2,000 records covering all the information available to date in the literature.
Variability of environmental metrics (pH, salinity, and water temperature) in habitats where records of the B. plicatilis species complex are available. Records are visualized for eleven species in the complex and for those from studies that used DNA taxonomy but did not manage to identify the species, named ‘unidentified’. The actual values of the observations are overimposed on the boxplots as blue dots to show sample size
Discussion
The first unambiguous evidence for the existence of cryptic species in rotifers was found in what was until then considered a species, Brachionus plicatilis, by Fu et al. (1991a, b). The following cryptic species complex was identified for the Keratella cochlearis complex by Derry et al. (2003a, b). In the following years, rotifers became one of the groups of animals with the highest occurrence of cryptic species complexes (Fontaneto et al., 2009). The most recent reviews listed 42 cryptic species complexes in rotifers (Gabaldón et al., 2017; Kordbacheh et al., 2023): the increased number we found in the current review, namely 54, is due to the inclusion of bdelloid rotifers in addition to a few more recent studies.
Previous reviews on cryptic species in rotifers focused on reproductive barriers between species within a complex (Kordbacheh et al., 2023) and on levels of niche differentiation between sympatric cryptic species (Gabaldón et al., 2017). This is the first study that attempts quantitatively to assess whether ecological differentiation could have been one of the drivers of the speciation process within cryptic species complexes in rotifers. Our survey revealed that, despite the increasing number of instances of cryptic species in rotifers, scarce ecological information is currently available for these species. Except for the Brachionus calyciflorus and Brachionus plicatilis complexes, very few studies address potential ecological differences between cryptic species belonging to the same complex in the field and even when such attempts were performed, results were often negative. For example, Leasi et al. (2013) tried to disentangle the drivers of the differential occurrence of the cryptic species within the Testudinella clypeata species complex, a brackish water rotifer, but did not find any difference in salinity tolerance between species. Obertegger et al. (2012, 2014) analysed cryptic species in complexes of the genera Polyarthra and Synchaeta and identified only a minor effect of phosphorus levels and only for one species complex.
Previous studies on the Brachionus calyciflorus and Brachionus plicatilis species complexes were the only ones suggesting potential ecological differences between species. Our detailed meta-analysis performed on these two species, gathering all available information on environmental characteristics retrieved from published papers, indeed confirmed that some of the cryptic species may be adapted only to a narrow range of values for some of the environmental features.
For the B. calyciflorus species complex, seasonal successions, potentially associated with differences in temperature adaptation, were already identified in the field in China (Zhang et al., 2018) and confirmed in laboratory experiments on life-history traits (Zhang et al., 2019; Paraskevopoulou et al., 2020) and on thermal tolerance (Paraskevopoulou et al., 2018). The results of our meta-analysis support that B. fernandoi is found in the field at lower temperatures than the other species in the complex. In a recent study, sequence divergence of the heat shock protein 40 gene (HSP40 kDa), a gene associated with thermal tolerance in Brachionus (Smith et al., 2013), was studied amongst the cryptic species within the B. calyciflorus species complex (Kiemel et al., 2022). The study revealed a divergent sequence evolution of HSP40kDa between the thermotolerant B. calyciflorus s.s. and the thermosensitive B. fernandoi. Selection analysis suggested that B. calyciflorus s.s. retained ancestral features in the HSP 40 kDa from which B. fernandoi diverged through positive selection (Kiemel et al., 2022). It is known that the HSP40 KDa is closely tied to thermal tolerance (Smith et al., 2013), thus it is likely that the most recently evolved trait is ‟thermotolerance loss”. Given that hybridization has been observed between B. calyciflorus s.s. and B. fernandoi (Kiemel et al., 2022), it is plausible that the occupation of distinct temporally isolated niches based on different temperature tolerances may act as a pre-zygotic isolation mechanism, thereby promoting the integrity of species boundaries and facilitating the process of speciation (Kiemel et al., 2022; Kordbacheh et al., 2023). To further explore the role of temperature in shaping the occurrence and distribution of the species within the B. calyciflorus complex, it would be worthwhile to investigate the possibility of a biogeographical gradient associated with latitude, which could be connected to variations in water temperature.
Regarding the B. plicatilis species complex, the situation is more intricate, involving 15 different species (Mills et al., 2017). Furthermore, the complex was first identified as a group of separate species 30 years ago, in contrast to the B. calyciflorus complex, which was clearly identified as a cryptic species complex only within the past decade. Differential ecological responses between co-occurring species of the B. plicatilis complex are well known, with temperature and salinity identified as key factors already from the 1990s (Gómez et al., 1995, 1997). The crucial role of these two parameters was confirmed later in both laboratory and field studies (Ortells et al., 2003; Campillo et al., 2011; Montero-Pau et al., 2011; Papakostas et al., 2013; Gabaldón et al., 2015a, b). Additionally, predatory pressure was shown as a factor affecting the species coexistence and seasonal succession in three species from this complex (Lapesa et al., 2002). Recently, oxygen availability was suggested to play a role in species distribution and phenotypic plasticity in five Brachionus species representing the complex (Walczyńska & Serra, 2022). Finally, environmental unpredictability was found to be an important factor affecting the reproductive strategy in Brachionus plicatilis s.s. (Franch-Gras et al., 2014, 2017; Tarazona et al., 2017; Colinas et al., 2023), suggesting its possible role in ecological interactions between species. Another main difference between species in the complex is that, for example, B. asplanchnoidis has always been found only in continental saltwater bodies, like soda pans and never in marine waters (Michaloudi et al., 2017; Mills et al., 2017), with a potential adaptation to differences in salt composition. Our results of potential differences in adaptation to pH in the complex may be related to the same idea, with different ionic compositions of water driving speciation process. Yet, the results of our study of B. paranguensis being potentially adapted to a higher pH that the other species is weak: only one measurement is currently available for this species on pH and no measurements at all exist for other species. An alternative possible interpretation of our result on the role of pH is that pH is positively correlated with the rate of photosynthesis, and therefore also with oxygen concentration (Wetzel, 2001). Lack of sufficient information on oxygen conditions has prevented us from distinguishing the role of each of these factors separately. What is sure is that some hints exist on the occurrence of ecological differences between species in the B. plicatilis complex. Surprisingly, ecological differences between species, as analysed in this study, are not so strong as they are known in the cases when species co-occur (see Gabaldón et al., 2017 for a review). Such discrepancy could be explained as another case of niche displacement in rotifers (Marrone et al., 2023), with co-occurring species partitioning resources more strongly than when not co-occurring.
Temperature is amongst the most relevant variables affecting living organisms (Johnston & Bennett, 2008), and other parameters like oxygen concentration, pH, and salinity depend on temperature. The complexity of organismal interactions with the environment and limited information on the environmental reference of species distributions make identifying responsible environmental conditions challenging (Torres-Dowdall et al., 2013; Pociecha et al., 2016).
Another potential driver of speciation within a complex could be related to geographical isolation (Coyne & Orr, 2004). No review exists on the effect of geography on differentiation between cryptic taxa in rotifer complexes; yet, evidence from the most studied complexes, suggest that neither in B. calyciflorus s.l. nor in B. plicatilis s.l. each cryptic species could have a more limited distribution than that of the whole species complex (Mills et al., 2017; Michaloudi et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2022).
Our summary reveals that studies on ecological differentiation of cryptic species complexes in rotifers are biased towards abiotic factors. To gain a more comprehensive view, further research is also needed on the biological networks of interactions. For example, differences between cryptic species in a complex could occur in food composition, parasite–host interactions (Gorbunov & Kosova, 2001), and coadaptation with predators. Previous studies on predator–prey interactions found differentiation in life-history strategy (e.g. attached and free-swimming life forms of B. dorcas when exposed to Asplanchna kairomone by Jiang et al., 2021), morphology (e.g. spine length and angle differentiation of the same clone of B. calyciflorus s.l. against Asplanchna exposure by Gilbert, 2018), and behavioural responses (e.g. floating behaviour differentiation of B. calyciflorus s.l. against Asplanchna exposure by Zhang et al. (2021) and Gilbert (2023)). Very little data exist on these topics for comparative analyses within cryptic species complexes.
More data and analysis are surely needed before any reliable inference could be suggested on the drivers of the process of speciation within cryptic species complexes representing different groups of organisms. We are still far from understanding the patterns of ecological differences between species; only after a clear identification of the patterns found in the field between cryptic species within a complex we could start to speculate on the mechanisms involved in the speciation processes. Useful examples are coming from the differential thermal response of B. fernandoi in the B. calyciflorus complex analysed in the frame of gene expression (Paraskevopoulou et al., 2020; Kiemel et al., 2022), and more studies along this line would be welcome in the near future.
Species coexistence is driven by niche differentiation, which depends on the species-specific tolerances to all the environmental variables they experience and by species interactions, which describe how the species relate to each other within the environmental space they occupy. Both biotic and abiotic facets of niche differentiation need to be taken into account to understand species diversification and biodiversity patterns. In this study, we mainly focused on niche differences between species within cryptic species complexes in rotifers, based on the available published information. Although our main finding is that at the moment there is not enough data to perform any rigorous ecological analyses, yet, we provide hints that the topic could be interesting and worth developing. Also, we point where the major gaps are and therefore we would like to encourage other researchers to fill those gaps, not only for the case of rotifers but also for other cryptic species complexes.
Data availability
All raw data used for the study are available in the main document and in the Supplementary Tables.
References
Alcántara-Rodríguez, J. A., J. Ciros-Pérez, E. Ortega-Mayagoitia, C. R. Serrania-Soto & E. Piedra-Ibarra, 2012. Local adaptation in populations of a Brachionus group plicatilis cryptic species inhabiting three deep crater lakes in Central Mexico. Freshwater Biology 57: 728–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02738.x.
Aránguiz-Acuña, A., P. Pérez-Portilla, A. De la Fuente & D. Fontaneto, 2018. Life-history strategies in zooplankton promote coexistence of competitors in extreme environments with high metal content. Scientific Reports 8: 11060. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29487-3.
Arroyoo-Castro J. L., J. Alvarado-Flores, J. C. Uh-Moo & C. G. Koh-Pasos, 2019. Monogonont rotifers species of the island Cozumel, Quintana Roo, México. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e34719.
Begon, M., C. R. Townsend & J. L. Harper, 2006. Ecology. From Individuals to Ecosystems, 4th ed. Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken:
Benítez-Días, M. I. M., M. E. Castellanos-Páez, G. Garza-Mouriño, M. J. Ferrara-Guerrero & M. Pagano, 2014. Spatiotemporal variations of zoplankton community in a shallow tropical brackish lagoon (Sontecomapan Veracruz, Mexico). Zoological Studies 53: 59.
Berzins B. & B. Pejler, 1989a. Rotifer occurence in relation to oxygen content. Hydrobiologia, 183, 165–172.
Berzins B & B. Pejler, 1989b. Rotifer occurence in relation to temperature. Hydrobiologia, 175, 223–231.
Bernatchez, L., A. Chouinard & G. Lu, 1999. Integrating molecular genetics and ecology in studies of adaptive radiation: whitefish, Coregonus sp., as a case study. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01165.x.
Bernatchez, L., S. Renaut, A. R. Whiteley, N. Derome, J. Jeukens, L. Landry, G. Lu, A. W. Nolte, K. Østbye, S. M. Rogers & J. St-Cyr, 2010. On the origin of species: insights from the ecological genomics of lake whitefish. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 1783–1800. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0274.
Bickford, D., D. J. Lohman, N. S. Sodhi, P. K. L. Ng, R. Meier, K. Winker, K. K. Ingram & I. Das, 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004.
Birky, C. W., C. Ricci, G. Melone & D. Fontaneto, 2011. Integrating DNA and morphological taxonomy to describe diversity in poorly studied microscopic animals: new species of the genus Abrochtha Bryce, 1910 (Rotifera: Bdelloidea: Philodinavidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 161(4): 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00674.x.
Blonder, B., 2018. Hypervolume concepts in niche-and trait-based ecology. Ecography 41: 1441–1455. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03187.
Cakil, Z. V., G. Garlasché, N. Iakovenko, A. Di Cesare, E. M. Eckert, R. Guidetti, L. Hamdan, K. Janko, D. Lukashanets, L. Rebecchi, S. Schiaparelli, T. Sforzi, E. Š Kašparová, A. Velasco-Castrillón, E. J. Walsh & D. Fontaneto, 2021. Comparative phylogeography reveals consistently shallow genetic diversity in a mitochondrial marker in Antarctic bdelloid rotifers. Journal of Biogeography 48(7): 1797–1809. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14116.
Campillo, S., E. M. García-Roger, M. Jose Carmona & M. Serra, 2011. Local adaptation in rotifer populations. Evolutionary Ecology 25: 933–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9447-5.
Castellanos-Páez, M. E., G. Garza-Mouriño & M. J. Ferrara-Guerrero, 2005. Rotifers (Rotifera) of Sontecomapan, Veracruz, a coastal lagoon of Mexico. Scientiae Naturae. 7 (2).
Chapman, L. J., F. Galis & J. Shinn, 2000. Phenotypic plasticity and the possible role of genetic assimilation: hypoxia-induced trade-offs in the morphological traits of an African cichlid. Ecology Letters 3: 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00160.x.
Cheng, X., Y. Xi & H. Li, 2008. Seasonal changes in the genetic structure of a Brachionus calyciflorus population in Lake Liantang based on ITS sequences. Acta Zoologica Sinica 54: 245–255.
Cieplinski, A., U. Obertegger & T. Weisse, 2018. Life history traits and demographic parameters in the Keratella cochlearis (Rotifera, Monogononta) species complex. Hydrobiologia 811: 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3499-2.
Ciros-Pérez, J., M. J. Carmona & M. Serra, 2001. Resource competition between sympatric sibling rotifer species. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 1511–1523. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2001.46.6.1511.
Ciros-Pérez, J., M. J. Carmona, S. Lapesa & M. Serra, 2004. Predation as a factor mediating resource competition among rotifer sibling species. Limnology and Oceanography 49: 40–50. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.1.0040.
Colinas, N., M. J. Carmona, M. Serra & E. M. García-Roger, 2023. Transgenerational effect on sexual reproduction in rotifer populations in relation to the environmental predictability of their habitats. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14084.
Coyne, J. A. & H. A. Orr, 2004. Speciation, Sinauer Associates, Oxford University Press, Oxford:
de Sousa-Paula, L. C., F. A. C. Pessoa, D. Otranto & F. Dantas-Torres, 2021. Beyond taxonomy: species complexes in New World phlebotomine sand flies. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 35: 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12510.
Debortoli, N., X. Li, I. Eyres, D. Fontaneto, B. Hespeels, C. Q. Tang, J.-F. Flot & K. Van Doninck, 2016. Genetic exchange among bdelloid rotifers is more likely due to horizontal gene transfer than to meiotic sex. Current Biology 26(6): 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.031.
Deng, Z., W. Yang, D. Blair, W. Hu & M. Yin, 2022. Diversity of Brachionus plicatilis species complex (Rotifera) in inland saline waters from China: presence of a new mitochondrial clade on the Tibetan Plateau. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 171: 107457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107457.
Derry, A. M., E. E. Prepas & P. D. N. Hebert, 2003a. A comparison of zooplankton communities in saline lakewater with variable anion composition. Hydrobiologia 50: 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000007414.12566.19.
Derry, A. M., P. D. N. Hebert & E. E. Prepas, 2003b. Evolution of rotifers in saline and subsaline lakes: a molecular phylogenetic approach. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 675–685. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.2.0675.
Dumont, H. J., 1983. Biogeography of rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 19–30.
Eisenring, M., F. Altematt, A. M. Westram & J. Jokela, 2016. Habitat requirements and ecological niche of two cryptic amphipod species at landscape and local scales. Ecosphere 7(5): e01319.
Enríquez-García, C., S. Nandini, S. S. S. Sarma, 2009. Seasonal dynamics of zooplankton in lake Huetzalin, Xochimilco (Mexico City, Mexico). Limnologica 39: 283–291.
Fišer, C., C. T. Robinson & F. Malard, 2018. Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept. Molecular Ecology 27: 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14486.
Fontaneto, D., 2014. Molecular phylogenies as a tool to understand diversity in rotifers. International Review of Hydrobiology 99: 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201301719.
Fontaneto, D., 2019. Long-distance passive dispersal in microscopic aquatic animals. Movement Ecology 7: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0155-7.
Fontaneto, D., T. G. Barraclough, K. Chen, C. Ricci & E. A. Herniou, 2008. Molecular evidence for broad-scale distributions in bdelloid rotifers: everything is not everywhere but most things are very widespread. Molecular Ecology 17: 3136–3146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03806.x.
Fontaneto, D., M. Kaya, E. A. Herniou & T. G. Barraclough, 2009. Extreme levels of hidden diversity in microscopic animals (Rotifera) revealed by DNA taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53: 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.04.011.
Fontaneto, D., N. Iakovenko, I. Eyres, M. Kaya, M. Wyman & T. G. Barraclough, 2011. Cryptic diversity in the genus Adineta Hudson & Gosse, 1886 (Rotifera: Bdelloidea: Adinetidae): a DNA taxonomy approach. Hydrobiologia 662(1): 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0481-7.
Fontaneto, D., A. M. Barbosa, H. Segers & M. Pautasso, 2012. The ‘rotiferologist’ effect and other global correlates of species richness in monogonont rotifers. Ecography 35: 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06850.x.
Fontaneto, D., J. F. Flot & C. Q. Tang, 2015. Guidelines for DNA taxonomy, with a focus on the meiofauna. Marine Biodiversity 45: 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-015-0319-7.
Franch-Gras, L., J. Montero-Pau & M. Serra, 2014. The effect of environmental uncertainty and diapause investment on the occurrence of specialist and generalist species. International Review of Hydrobiology 99: 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201301712.
Franch-Gras, L., E. M. García-Roger, M. Serra & M. J. Carmona, 2017. Adaptation in response to environmental unpredictability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286: 20170427. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0427.
Fu, Y., K. Hirayama & Y. Natsukari, 1991a. Morphological differences between two types of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis O.F. Müller. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 151: 29–41.
Fu, Y., K. Hirayama & Y. Natsukari, 1991b. Genetic divergence between S and L type strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis O.F. Müller. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 151: 43–56.
Gabaldón, C., M. Serra, M. J. Carmona & J. Montero-Pau, 2015a. Life-history traits, abiotic environment and coexistence: the case of two cryptic rotifer species. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 465: 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2015.01.016.
Gabaldón, C., M. J. Carmona, J. Montero-Pau & M. Serra, 2015b. Long-term competitive dynamics of two cryptic rotifer species: diapause and fluctuating conditions. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0124406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124406.
Gabaldón, C., D. Fontaneto, M. J. Carmona, J. Montero-Pau & M. Serra, 2017. Ecological differentiation in cryptic rotifer species: what we can learn from the Brachionus plicatilis complex. Hydrobiologia 796: 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2723-9.
Gálvez A., P. R. Peres-Neto, A. Castillo-Escrivà, F. Bonilla, A. Camacho, E. M. García-Roger, S. Iepure, J. Miralles- Lorenzo, J. S. Monrós, C. Olmo, A. Picazo, C. Rojo, J. Rueda, M. Sahuquillo, M. Sasa, M. Segura, X. Armengol, F. Mesquita-Joanes, 2022. Inconsistent response of taxonomic groups to space and environment in mediterranean and tropical pond metacommunities. Ecology 104(1): e3835.
García-Morales, A. E. & O. Domínguez-Domínguez, 2019. Cryptic molecular diversity in the morphologically variable rotiferan Brachionus quadridentatus (Rotifera: Monogononta). Revista de Biología Tropical 67(6): 1114–1130. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v67i6.33996.
García-Morales, A. E. & M. Elías-Gutiérrez, 2013. DNA barcoding of freshwater Rotifera in Mexico: evidence of cryptic speciation in common rotifers. Molecular Ecology Resources 13: 1097–1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12080.
Ge, Y., Y. Xi, J. Ma & D. Xu, 2012. rDNA ITS sequences among morphotypes of Keratella cochlearis, Keratella quadrata and Brachionus forficula (Rotifera). Genetics and Molecular Research 11(1): 765–774. https://doi.org/10.4238/2012.March.22.7.
Gilbert, J. J., 2018. Morphological variation and its significance in a polymorphic rotifer: environmental, endogenous, and genetic controls. Bioscience 68: 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix162.
Gilbert, J. J., 2023. Does the predatory rotifer Asplanchna induce a behavioral response in the prey rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus? Journal of Plankton Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbad006.
Gómez, A., 2005. Molecular ecology of rotifers: from population differentiation to speciation. Hydrobiologia 546: 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01455.x.
Gómez, A. & T. W. Snell, 1996. Sibling species and cryptic speciation in the Brachionus plicatilis species complex (Rotifera). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9: 953–964.
Gómez, A., M. Temprano & M. Serra, 1995. Ecological genetics of a cyclical parthenogen in temporary habitats. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8: 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1995.8050601.x.
Gómez, A., M. J. Carmona & M. Serra, 1997. Ecological factors affecting gene flow in the Brachionus plicatilis complex (Rotifera). Oecologia 111: 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050245.
Gómez, A., M. Serra, G. Carvalho & D. H. Lunt, 2002. Speciation in ancient cryptic species complexes: evidence from the molecular phylogeny of Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Evolution 56: 1431–1444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01455.x.
Gómez, A., J. Montero-Pau, D. H. Lunt & M. Serra, 2007. Persistent genetic signatures of colonization in Brachionus manjavacas rotifers in the Iberian Peninsula. Molecular Ecology 16: 3228–3240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03372.x.
Gorbunov, A. K. & A. A. Kosova, 2001. Parasites in rotifers from the Volga delta. Hydrobiologia 446: 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017569004998.
Guerrero-Jiménez, G., P. E. Vannucchi, M. Silva-Briano, A. Adabache-Ortiz, R. Rico-Martínez, D. Roberts, R. Meilson & M. Elías-Gutiérrez, 2019. Brachionus paranguensis sp. nov. (Rotifera, Monogononta), a member of the L group of the Brachionus plicatilis complex. ZooKeys 880: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.28992.
Halabowski, D., I. Bielańska-Grajner, I. Lewin & A. Sowa, 2022. Diversity of rotifers in small rivers affected by human activity. Diversity 14: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020127.
Hamil, S., D. Bouchelouche, S. Arab, M. Alili, M. Baha & A. Arab, 2021. The relationship between zooplankton community and environmental factors of Ghrib Dam in Algeria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28: 46592–46602.
Hernández-Rodríguez, M. A., G. E. Santos-Medrano, G. Quintero-Díaz & Rico-Martínez, 1999. Correlación entre la precipitación pluvial y la densidad y composición del zooplancton de ocho represas del estado de Aguascalientes, México Revista de Biologia Tropical 47: 121–127.
Hwang, D.-S., H.-U. Dahms, H. G. Park & J.-S. Lee, 2013. A new intertidal Brachionus and intrageneric phylogenetic relationships among Brachionus as revealed by allometry and CO1-ITS1 gene analysis. Zoological Studies 52(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1810-522X-52-13.
Iakovenko, N. S., J. Smykla, P. Convey, E. Kašparová, I. A. Kozeretska, V. Trokhymets, I. Dykyy, M. Plewka, M. Devetter, Z. Duriš & K. Janko, 2015. Antarctic bdelloid rotifers: diversity, endemism and evolution. Hydrobiologia 761(1): 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2463-2.
Jaturapruek, R., D. Fontaneto, P. Meksuwan, P. Pholpunthin & S. Maiphae, 2018. Planktonic and periphytic bdelloid rotifers from Thailand reveal a species assemblage with a combination of cosmopolitan and tropical species. Systematics and Biodiversity 16(2): 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2017.1353554.
Jaturapruek, R., D. Fontaneto, S. Mammola & S. Maiphae, 2021. Potential niche displacement in species of aquatic bdelloid rotifers between temperate and tropical areas. Hydrobiologia 848: 4903–4918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04681-z.
Jiang, S., Y. Bai, F. Sun, L. Ge & Y.-L. Xi, 2021. Divergent responses in morphology and life history to an Asplanchna kairomone between attached and free-swimming Brachionus dorcas (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 848: 1925–1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04572-3.
Jiménez-Contreras, J., S. S. Sarma, M. Calderón-Torres & S. Nandini, 2013. Morphological, morphometrical and molecular (CO1 and ITS) analysis of the rotifer Asplanchna brightwellii from selected freshwater bodies in Central Mexico. Journal of Environmental Biology 34(6): 1039–1046.
Jiménez-Contreras, J., S. Nandini & S. S. S. Sarma, 2018. Diversity of Rotifera (Monogononta) and egg ratio of selected taxa in the canals of Xochimilco (Mexico City). Wetlands 38: 1033.
Johnston, I. A. & A. F. Bennett, 2008. Animals and Temperature. Phenotypic and Evolutionary Adaptation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:
Kaya, M., E. A. Herniou, T. G. Barraclough & D. Fontaneto, 2009. Inconsistent estimates of diversity between traditional and DNA taxonomy in bdelloid rotifers. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 9(1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2008.10.002.
Kiemel, K., M. Gurke, S. Paraskevopoulou, K. Havenstein, G. Weithoff & R. Tiedemann, 2022. Variation in heat shock protein 40 kDa relates to divergence in thermotolerance among cryptic rotifer species. Scientific Reports 12: 22626. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27137-3.
Kim, H.-J., M. Iwabuchi, Y. Sakakura & A. Hagiwara, 2017. Comparison of low temperature adaptation ability in three native and two hybrid strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis species complex. Fisheries Science 83: 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-016-1045-1.
Kimpel, D., J. Gockel, G. Gerlach & O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, 2015. Population structuring in the monogonont rotifer Synchaeta pectinata: high genetic divergence on a small geographical scale. Freshwater Biology 60(7): 1364–1378. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12574.
Kordbacheh, A., A. N. Shapiro & E. J. Walsh, 2019. Reproductive isolation, morphological and ecological differentiation among cryptic species of Euchlanis dilatata, with the description of four new species. Hydrobiologia 844: 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-019-3892-0.
Kordbacheh, A., H. Rahimian & D. Fontaneto, 2023. Mechanisms of reproductive isolation among cryptic species in monogonont rotifers. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05131-0.
Korshunova, T., A. Martynov, T. Bakken & B. Picton, 2017. External diversity is restrained by internal conservatism: new nudibranch mollusc contributes to the cryptic species problem. Zoologica Scripta 46: 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12253.
Kostopoulou, V. & O. Vadstein, 2007. Growth performance of the rotifers Brachionus plicatilis, B. ‘Nevada’ and B. ‘Cayman’ under different food concentrations. Aquaculture 273: 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.10.037.
Lapesa, S., T. W. Snell, D. M. Fields & M. Serra, 2002. Predatory interactions between a cyclopoid copepod and three sibling rotifer species. Freshwater Biology 47: 1685–1695. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00926.x.
Lapesa, S., T. W. Snell, D. M. Fields & M. Serra, 2004. Selective feeding of Arctodiaptomus salinus (Copepoda, Calanoida) on co-occurring sibling rotifer species. Freshwater Biology 49: 1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01249.x.
Leasi, F., C. Q. Tang, W. H. De Smet & D. Fontaneto, 2013. Cryptic diversity with wide salinity tolerance in the putative euryhaline Testudinella clypeata (Rotifera, Monogononta). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 168: 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12020.
Li, H., Y. Xi & X. Cheng, 2009a. Comparative studies on life history characteristics of three sibling species in Brachionus calyciflorus complex. Acta Ecologica Sinica 29: 581–588.
Li, L., C. Niu & R. Ma, 2009b. Genetic differentiation in resting-egg bank of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus population in Xihai Pond, Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica 29: 606–612.
Li, L., C. Niu & R. Ma, 2010. Rapid temporal succession identified by COI of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas in Xihai Pond, Beijing, China, in relation to ecological traits. Journal of Plankton Research 32: 951–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbq014.
Li, Y., Y. Xi, A. Wang, X. Niu, X. Wen & G. Liu, 2014. Temporal variation in composition of Brachionus calyciflorus complex and life history traits of sibling species in Lake Tingtang. Acta Ecologica Sinica 34: 6172–6181. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201301280179.
Losos, J. B., 2008. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecology Letters 11: 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x.
Lowe, C. D., S. J. Kemp, C. Días-Avalos & D. J. S. Montagnes, 2007. How does salinity tolerance influence the distributions of Brachionus plicatilis sibling species? Marine Biology 150: 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0366-5.
Luo, Z., W. Yang, Ch. P. Leaw, V. Pospelova, G. Bilien, G. R. Liow, P. T. Lim & H. Gu, 2017. Cryptic diversity within the harmful dinoflagellate Akashiwo sanguinea in coastal Chinese waters is related to differentiated ecological niches. Harmful Algae 66: 88–96.
Lüdecke, D., M. S. Ben-Shachar, I. Patil, P. Waggoner & D. Makowski, 2021. Performance: an R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software 6: 60. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139.
Macdonald, K. S., III., L. Yampolsky & J. E. Duffy, 2005. Molecular and morphological evolution of the amphipod radiation of Lake Baikal. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.01.013.
Makino, W., N. Maruoka, M. Nakagawa & N. Takamura, 2017. DNA barcoding of freshwater zooplankton in Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Ecological Research 32(4): 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1458-z.
Malekzadeh-Viayeh, R., R. Pak-Tarmani, N. Rostamkhani & D. Fontaneto, 2014. Diversity of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis species complex (Rotifera: Monogononta) in Iran through integrative taxonomy. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 170: 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12106.
Mammola, S., C. P. Carmona, T. Guillerme & P. Cardoso, 2021. Concepts and applications in functional diversity. Functional Ecology 35: 1869–1885. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13882.
Marrone, F., D. Fontaneto & L. Naselli-Flores, 2023. Cryptic diversity, niche displacement and our poor understanding of taxonomy and ecology of aquatic microorganisms. Hydrobiologia 850: 1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04904-x.
Michaloudi, E., S. Mills, S. Papakostas, C. P. Stelzer, A. Triantafyllidis, I. Kappas, K. Vasileiadou, K. Proiso & T. J. Abatzopoulos, 2017. Morphological and taxonomic demarcation of Brachionus asplanchnoidis Charin within the Brachionus plicatilis cryptic species complex (Rotifera, Monogononta). Hydrobiologia 796: 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2924-2.
Michaloudi, E., S. Papakostas, G. Stamou, V. Neděla, E. Tihlaříková, W. Zhang & S. A. Declerck, 2018. Reverse taxonomy applied to the Brachionus calyciflorus cryptic species complex: morphometric analysis confirms species delimitations revealed by molecular phylogenetic analysis and allows the (re) description of four species. PLoS ONE 13: e0203168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203168.
Mikschi E. 1989. Rotifer distribution in relation to temperature and oxygen content. Hydrobiologia, 186/187: 209–214.
Mills, S., J. A. Alcántara-Rodríguez, J. Ciros-Pérez, A. Gómez, A. Hagiwara, K. H. Galindo, C. D. Jersabek, R. Malekzadeh-Viayeh, F. Leasi, D. B. Mark Weich, S. Papakostas, H. Segers, M. Serra, R. Shie, R. Smolak, T. W. Snell, C. Q. Tang, R. L. Wallace, D. Fontaneto & E. J. Walsh, 2017. Fifteen species in one: deciphering the Brachionus plicatilis species complex (Rotifera, Monogononta) through DNA taxonomy. Hydrobiologia 796: 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2725-7.
Moka, W., E. Sawayama, D. Noguchi & M. Takagi, 2016. Identification of hatchery-cultured S-type rotifer escapees, Brachionus koreanus, in a wild environment: a preliminary study. Fish Genetics and Breeding Science 46: 23–29.
Montero-Pau, J., E. Ramos-Rodríguez, M. Serra & A. Gómez, 2011. Long-term coexistence of rotifer cryptic species. PLoS ONE 6: 6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021530.
Moreno, E., J. M. Conde-Porcuna & A. Gómez, 2017. Barcoding rotifer biodiversity in Mediterranean ponds using diapausing egg banks. Ecology and Evolution 7(13): 4855–4867. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2986.
Moreno-Gutiérrez, R. M, S. S. S. Sarma, A. S. Sobrino-Figueroa & S. Nandini, 2018. Population growth potential of rotifers from a high altitude eutrophic waterbody, Madín reservoir (State of Mexico, Mexico): The importance of seasonal sampling. Journal of Limnology, 77(3): 441–451.
Niu, X., Y. Xi, Y. Li, A. Wang & G. Liu, 2013. Rapid change in structure of Brachionus calyciflorus complex collected from Jiulian Pond and its ecological mechanism. The Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 3561–3566.
Obertegger, U., D. Fontaneto & G. Flaim, 2012. Using DNA taxonomy to investigate the ecological determinants of plankton diversity: explaining the occurrence of Synchaeta spp. (Rotifera, Monogononta) in mountain lakes. Freshwater Biology 57: 1545–1553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02815.x.
Obertegger, U., G. Flaim & D. Fontaneto, 2014. Cryptic diversity within the rotifer Polyarthra dolichoptera along an altitudinal gradient. Freshwater Biology 59: 2413–2427. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12447.
Obertegger, U., A. Cieplinski, D. Fontaneto & S. Papakostas, 2018. Mitonuclear discordance as a confounding factor in the DNA taxonomy of monogonont rotifers. Zoologica Scripta 47(1): 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12264.
Ortells, R., T. W. Snell, A. Gómez & M. Serra, 2000. Patterns of genetic differentiation in resting egg banks of a rotifer species complex in Spain. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 149: 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/149/2000/529.
Ortells, R., A. Gómez & M. Serra, 2003. Coexistence of cryptic rotifer species: ecological and genetic characterisation of Brachionus plicatilis. Freshwater Biology 48: 2194–2202. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01159.x.
Padial, J. M., A. Miralles, I. De la Riva & M. Vences, 2010. The integrative future of taxonomy. Frontiers in Zoology 7: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-7-16.
Papakostas, S., E. Michaloudi, A. Triantafyllidis, I. Kappas & T. J. Abatzopoulos, 2013. Allochronic divergence and clonal succession: two microevolutionary processes sculpturing population structure of Brachionus rotifers. Hydrobiologia 700: 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1217-7.
Papakostas, S., E. Michaloudi, K. Proios, M. Brehm, L. Verhage, J. Rota, C. Peña, G. Stamou, V. L. Pritchard, D. Fontaneto & S. A. Declerck, 2016. Integrative taxonomy recognizes evolutionary units despite widespread mitonuclear discordance: evidence from a rotifer cryptic species complex. Systematic Biology 65: 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw016.
Paraskevopoulou, S., R. Tiedemann & G. Weithoff, 2018. Differential response to heat stress among evolutionary lineages of an aquatic invertebrate species complex. Biology Letters 14: 20180498. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0498.
Paraskevopoulou, S., A. B. Dennis, G. Weithoff & R. Tiedemann, 2020. Temperature-dependent life history and transcriptomic responses in heat-tolerant versus heat-sensitive Brachionus rotifers. Scientific Reports 10: 13281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70173-0.
Pociecha, A. & I. Bielańska-Grajner, 2015. Wielkoskalowa ocena różnorodności biologicznej organizmów planktonowych w antropogenicznych systemach wodnych na obszarze Polski. Instytut Ochrony Przyrody, Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Krakowie (Large-Scale Assessment of Planktonic Organisms Biodiversity in Artificial Water Reservoirs in Poland) (In Polish with English summary).
Pociecha, A., W. Solarz, K. Najberek & E. Wilk-Woźniak, 2016. Native, alien, cosmopolitan, or cryptogenic? A framework for clarifying the origin status of rotifers. Aquatic Biology 24: 141–149. https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00644.
Ramlee, A., H. Suhaimi & N. W. Rasdi, 2022. Diversity and abundance of plankton in different habitat zonation of Papan river, Lake Kenyir, Malaysia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity 23(1).
R Core Team, 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org.
Rissler, R. J. & J. J. Apodaca, 2007. Adding more ecology into species delimitation: ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus). Systematic Biology 56(6): 924–942.
Sánchez-Dávila, P. P. A., G. Sotil, A. Adabache-Ortiz, D. Cueva & M. Silva-Briano, 2021. Integrative taxonomy of two Peruvian strains of Brachionus plicatilis complex with potential in aquaculture. Diversity 13(12): 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13120671.
Sanoamuang, L., 1998. Rotifera of some freshwater habitats in the floodplain of the River Nan, northern Tailand. Hydrobiologia 387: 27–33.
Sarma, S. S. S., M. Elías & C. Serranía, 1996. Rotifer from high altitude crater-lakes at Nevado de Toluca Volcano, México. Hidrobiológica 6 (1–2): 33–38.
Sarma, S. S. S. & M. Elías-Gutiérrez, 1997. Taxonomic studies of freshwater (Rotifera) from Mexico. Polish Archives of Hydrobiology 44 (3): 341–357.
Sarma, S. S. S. & M. Elías-Gutiérrez, 2000. Rotifers from Mexico: new records in high altitude ponds. The Southwestern Naturalist 45(3): 366–373.
Schälicke, S., J. Teubner, D. Martin-Creuzburg & A. Wacker, 2019. Fitness response variation within and among consumer species can be co-mediated by food quantity and biochemical quality. Scientific Reports 9: 16126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52538-2.
Schälicke, S., S. Heim, D. Martin-Creuzburg & A. Wacker, 2020. Inter- and intraspecific differences in rotifer fatty acid composition during acclimation to low-quality food. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0644.
Seehausen, O., 2006. African cichlid fish: a model system in adaptive radiation research. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 273: 1987–1998. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3539.
Seehausen, O., J. J. M. Van Alphen & R. Lande, 1999. Color polymorphism and sex ratio distortion in a cichlid fish as an incipient stage in sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Ecology Letters 2: 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00098.x.
Serra, M. & D. Fontaneto, 2017. Speciation in the Brachionous plicatilis species complex. In Hagiwara, A. & T. Yoshinaga (eds), Rotifers. Fisheries Science Series Springer, Singapore: 15–32.
Shen, K.-N., Ch.-W. Chang & J.-D. Durand, 2015. Spawning segregation and philopatry are major prezygotic barriers in sympatric cryptic Mugil cephalus species. Comptes Rendus Biologies 338(12): 803–811.
Sielaff, M., H. Schmidt, T. H. Struck, D. Rosenkranz, D. B. M. Welch, T. Hankeln & H. Herlyn, 2016. Phylogeny of Syndermata (syn. Rotifera): mitochondrial gene order verifies epizoic Seisonidea as sister to endoparasitic Acanthocephala within monophyletic Hemirotifera. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 96: 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.11.017.
Smith, H. A., A. R. Burns, T. L. Shearer & T. W. Snell, 2013. Three heat shock proteins are essential for rotifer thermotolerance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 413: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.11.027.
Smolak, R. & E. J. Walsh, 2022. Rotifer species richness in Kenyan waterbodies: contributions of environmental characteristics. Diversity 14(7): 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070583.
Struck, T. H., J. L. Feder, M. Bendiksby, S. Birkeland, J. Cerca, V. I. Gusarov, S. Kistenich, K.-H. Larsson, L. H. Liow, M. D. Nowak, B. Stedje, L. Bachmann & D. Dimitrov, 2018. Finding evolutionary processes hidden in cryptic species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 33(3): 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.007.
Suatoni, E., S. Vicario, S. Rice, T. Snell & A. Caccone, 2006. An analysis of species boundaries and biogeographic patterns in a cryptic species complex: the rotifer—Brachionus plicatilis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41(1): 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.025.
Swanstrom, J., K. Chen, K. Castillo, T. G. Barraclough & D. Fontaneto, 2011. Testing for evidence of inefficient selection in bdelloid rotifers: do sample size and habitat differences matter? Hydrobiologia 662(1): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0480-8.
Tarazona, E., E. M. García-Roger & M. J. Carmona, 2017. Experimental evolution of bet hedging in rotifer diapause traits as a response to environmental unpredictability. Oikos 126: 1162–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.04186.
Turner, P. N. & H. L. Taylor, 1998. Rotifers new to Florida, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia 387/388: 55–62.
Torres-Dowdall, J., F. Dargent, C. A. Handelsman, I. W. Ramnarine & C. K. Ghalambor, 2013. Ecological correlates of the distribution limits of two poeciliid species along a salinity gradient. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 108: 790–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12031.
Vázquez-Sánchez, A., G. Reyes-Venegas, S. Nandini & S. S. S. Sarma, 2014. Diversity and abundance of rotifers during an annual cycle in the reservoir Valerio Trujano (Tepecoacuilco, Guerrero, Mexico). Inland Waters 4: 293–302.
Velasco-Castrillón, A., T. J. Page, J. A. E. Gibson & M. I. Stevens, 2014. Surprisingly high levels of biodiversity and endemism amongst Antarctic rotifers uncovered with mitochondrial DNA. Biodiversity 15(2–3): 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2014.930717.
Vyskočilová, S., W. T. Tay, S. Van Brunschot, S. Seal & J. Colvin, 2018. An integrative approach to discovering cryptic species within the Bemisia tabaci whitefly species complex. Scientific Reports 8: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29305-w.
Walczyńska, A. & M. Serra, 2022. Body size variability across habitats in the Brachionus plicatilis cryptic species complex. Scientific Reports 12: 6912. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10638-6.
Walsh, E. J., T. Schröder, R. L. Wallace & R. Rico-Martínez, 2009. Cryptic speciation in Lecane bulla (Monogononta: Rotifera) in Chihuahuan Desert waters. SIL Proceedings 30: 1046–1050. https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.2009.11902298.
Walter, G. H., 1991. What is resource partitioning? Journal of Theoretical Biology 150: 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80327-3.
Wang, X., X. Xiang, M. Xia, Y. Han, L. Huang & Y. Xi, 2014. Differences in life history characteristics between two sibling species in Brachionus calyciflorus complex from tropical shallow lakes. International Journal of Limnology 50: 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2014024.
Wen, X., Y. Xi, F. P. Qian, G. Zhang & X. L. Xiang, 2011. Comparative analysis of rotifer community structure in five subtropical shallow lakes in East China: role of physical and chemical conditions. Hydrobiologia 661: 303–316.
Wen, X., G. Zhang, Y. Xue & X. Xiang, 2016. Coexistence of cryptic Brachionus calyciflorus (Rotifera) species: roles of environmental variables. Journal of Plankton Research 38: 478–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbw006
Wetzel, R. G., 2001. Limnology. Lake and River Ecosystems, Elsevier Academic Press, Cambridge:
Wiens, J. J., 2011. The causes of species richness patterns across space, time, and clades and the role of “ecological limits.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 86: 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1086/659883.
Wiens, J. J. & C. H. Graham, 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431.
Xiang, X., Y. Xi, X. Wen, J. Zhang & Q. Ma, 2010. Spatial patterns of genetic differentiation in Brachionus calyciflorus species complex collected from East China in summer. Hydrobiologia 638: 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-0010-8.
Xiang, X., Y. Xi, X. Wen, G. Zhang, J. Wang & K. Hu, 2011a. Patterns and processes in the genetic differentiation of the Brachionus calyciflorus complex, a passively dispersing freshwater zooplankton. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 59: 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.02.011.
Xiang, X., Y. Xi, X. Wen, G. Zhang, J. Wang & K. Hu, 2011b. Genetic differentiation and phylogeographical structure of the Brachionus calyciflorus complex in eastern China. Molecular Ecology 20: 3027–3044. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05147.x.
Xiang, X., X. Wang, Y. Tao, R. Jiang, L. Ke & Y. Xi, 2015. Comparative studies on population growth of two Brachionus calyciflorus sibling species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, India B 87: 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0613-y.
Xiang, X., R. Jiang, Y. Tao, Y. Chen & Y. Xi, 2016. Differences in life history characteristics among three sympatric evolutionary species of the Rotaria rotatoria complex. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 31: 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2016.1141379.
Xiang, X., Y. Xi, L. Zhu & Q. Xu, 2017. Comparative studies of the population genetic structure of the Brachionus calyciflorus species complex from four inland lakes in Wuhu, China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 71: 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2017.01.015.
Xu, Q., J. Li, X. Xiang, H. Tan & Y. Xi, 2018. Life-history strategies in two Brachionus calyciflorus (Rotifera) evolving species: responses to temperature change. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 27: 3645–3653.
Xue, Y., X. Yang, G. Zhang & Y. Xi, 2017. Morphological differentiation of Brachionus calyciflorus caused by predation and coal ash pollution. Scientific Reports 7: 15779. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16192-w.
Yang, W., Z. Deng, D. Blair, W. Hu & M. Yin, 2022. Phylogeography of the freshwater rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus species complex in China. Hydrobiologia 849: 2813–2829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04897-7.
Yeom, J., N. Park, R. Jeong & W. Lee, 2021. Integrative description of cryptic Tigriopus species from Korea using MALDI-TOF MS and DNA barcoding. Frontiers in Marine Science 8: 648197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.648197.
Zhang, W. & S. A. J. Declerck, 2022. Intrinsic postzygotic barriers constrain cross-fertilisation between two hybridising sibling rotifer species of the Brachionus calyciflorus species complex. Freshwater Biology 67(2): 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13727.
Zhang, G., Y. Xi, Y. Xue, Y. Xiang & X. Wen, 2015. Coal fly ash effluent affects the distributions of Brachionus calyciflorus sibling species. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 112: 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.09.036.
Zhang, Y., A. Zhou, Y.-L. Xi, Q. Sun, L.-F. Ning, P. Xie, X.-L. Wen & X.-L. Xiang, 2018. Temporal patterns and processes of genetic differentiation of the Brachionus calyciflorus (Rotifera) complex in a subtropical shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 807(1): 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3407-9
Zhang, W., K. D. Lemmen, L. Zhou, S. Papakostas & S. A. Declerck, 2019. Patterns of differentiation in the life history and demography of four recently described species of the Brachionus calyciflorus cryptic species complex. Freshwater Biology 64: 1994–2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13388.
Zhang, H., Y. He, L. He, H. Yao & J. Xu, 2021. Behavioural response of Brachionus calyciflorus to the predator Asplanchna sieboldii. Freshwater Biology 66: 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13660.
Acknowledgements
MAJS thanks to Secretaria de Educación, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.
Funding
This research was partially funded by the Polish National Science Centre Grant No. N N305 374939 and under Institute of Nature Conversation, Polish Academy of Sciences subvention and by the Chinese Science and Technology Programme Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Water Resources (202223YBKT23).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Handling editor: Sidinei M. Thomaz
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Guest editors: Maria Špoljar, Diego Fontaneto, Elizabeth J. Walsh & Natalia Kuczyńska-Kippen / Diverse Rotifers in Diverse Ecosystems
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10750_2023_5291_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary file3 Table S3:Supplementary environmental information. Notation of environmental parameters: "min" and "max" - represent ranges ofconditions during the entire sampling period, as described in the corresponding bibliographic source; "unigue" - represents thevalue of an environmental parameter recorded during a given sampling period. (XLSX 406 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Walczyńska, A., Fontaneto, D., Kordbacheh, A. et al. Niche differentiation in rotifer cryptic species complexes: a review of environmental effects. Hydrobiologia 851, 2909–2926 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05291-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05291-7