Abstract
The right ventricle has long been perceived as the “low pressure bystander” of the left ventricle. Although the structure consists of, at first glance, the same cardiomyocytes as the left ventricle, it is in fact derived from a different set of precursor cells and has a complex three-dimensional anatomy and a very distinct contraction pattern. Mechanisms of right ventricular failure, its detection and follow-up, and more specific different responses to pressure versus volume overload are still incompletely understood. In order to fully comprehend right ventricular form and function, evolutionary biological entities that have led to the specifics of right ventricular physiology and morphology need to be addressed. Processes responsible for cardiac formation are based on very ancient cardiac lineages and within the first few weeks of fetal life, the human heart seems to repeat cardiac evolution. Furthermore, it appears that most cardiogenic signal pathways (if not all) act in combination with tissue-specific transcriptional cofactors to exert inductive responses reflecting an important expansion of ancestral regulatory genes throughout evolution and eventually cardiac complexity. Such molecular entities result in specific biomechanics of the RV that differs from that of the left ventricle. It is clear that sole descriptions of right ventricular contraction patterns (and LV contraction patterns for that matter) are futile and need to be addressed into a bigger multilayer three-dimensional picture. Therefore, we aim to present a complete picture from evolution, formation, and clinical presentation of right ventricular (mal)adaptation and failure on a molecular, cellular, biomechanical, and (patho)anatomical basis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The right ventricle (RV) has long been perceived as the “low-pressure bystander” of the left ventricle (LV). The lack of interest in RV pathobiology was primarily based on early studies that showed practically no increase in venous pressure when damaging the RV free wall [1, 2] and hence underestimated RV function as a potential player in biventricular function [3]. For a long period of time, the Fontan procedure, in which the absence of a sub-pulmonary ventricle had (within certain limits) negligible effects on overall heart function [4], supported a very limited role for the RV. Consequently, extensive research on RV form and function has been scarce. In most cases, the functionality of the RV was merely extrapolated from studies based on LV function.
Only recently was the RV “rediscovered” due to evidence indicating that the RV can indeed be a significant contributor to functional hemodynamics and cardiac output [5,6,7], particularly in the setting of pulmonary hypertension (PAH) and congenital heart disease (CHD). Importantly, new insights show that although the RV consists of, at first glance, the same cardiomyocytes as the LV, it is in fact derived from a different set of precursor cells, with complex three-dimensional anatomy and a very distinct contraction pattern [8]. Recent studies further sparked this renewed interest, showing that RV function is an important predictor of survival in patients with heart failure (HF), PAH, and CHD [9,10,11]. Nevertheless, profound knowledge of normal loading conditions and physiological adaptations ensuing morphology of the RV remains limited [12,13,14,15]. Furthermore, a significant caveat exists on the difference between pressure and volume loading of the RV, as most of the current research is performed in a model of PAH or pulmonary artery banding [15].
The mechanisms of RV failure, its detection and follow-up, and more specifically the different responses of the RV to pressure versus volume overload are still incompletely understood. Despite many apparent similarities between the LV and RV, there are significant differences on a morphological, physiological, and molecular level, evidenced by different responses of the ventricles to current HF therapies [6, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Notably, RV failure is not an entity on itself but rather a continuum of clinical symptoms related to increased severities of disease states [3, 6, 17] and associated with significant morbidity and mortality both in patients with HF with reduced [23, 24] and preserved [25, 26] ejection fraction (HFpEF). This raises the question of whether there is a “point of no return” within the pathobiological continuum of RV failure and if RV dysfunction is a marker of severity of HF or a separate entity leading to the worse prognosis of HF. Despite a lot of new research on RV physiology and clinical manifestations of RV failure, a translational approach to comprehend all aspects, linking morphology to function, is still lacking. Within this review, we aim to provide an overview of the developmental biology of the RV with a focus on the relationship between form and function. More specifically, current visions on the different cellular and molecular pathways and biomechanical implications on the spectrum from RV function to adaptation and failure will be discussed.
Evolutionary biology and embryology of the right ventricle
Comparative anatomy of the heart
In order to fully comprehend the functional anatomy of the RV and the intricate relation between form and function, we need to explore the evolutionary pathway leading to the formation of the RV. Indeed, studying common precursors could provide us with additional information on the formation and possible maladaptation of the RV dealing with altered loading conditions [27]. When comparing all vertebrate species, no fundamental differences exist in the phenotype and function of the heart. The heart, compared with other organs, has largely been insensitive to evolution indicating that the archetype of the original heart design in vertebrates was successful [27, 28]. Nevertheless, species-specific morphological adaptations, for example, bipedalism and change in the center of gravity, have occurred without alteration of the basic blueprint of the heart [28].
Emergence of a circulatory system and the rise of cardiac biomechanics
The emergent tree from first eukaryotic cells starts 1.5 billion years ago [29, 30] and about 700 million years ago, an organized body plan emerged with radial symmetry (sponges, jellyfish) followed by creatures with bilateral symmetry and a dorsoventral axis. The first tubular heart appeared in the bilateralia which diverged into two branches: the Protostomes (invertebrates) and the Deuterostomes (vertebrates) [31]. Although impossible to prove (due to lack of fossilization), it is almost certain that contemporary mammals inherited their hearts from our common placental ancestors, originating at the end of the Mesozoic around 125 million years ago [32, 33].
Embryogenesis of the heart shows a common step consisting of a primary cardiac tube derived from mesodermal precursor cells converging in the midline [34] with peristaltic movements pushing fluid into the pericellular spaces without vessels [31]. However, the conversion to terrestrial activities increased body size and the appearance of endothermia (both mandating an increased metabolism) necessitated an altered circulatory system with closed pulmonary and systemic circuits. Small creatures thrive on diffusion through either an open or a closed system. An open system mandates high output with low pressure where the blood, lymph, and extracellular fluid are mixed together. There is a large circulating volume (20–50% of the body weight) with low velocity blood flow [35]. In a closed system, there is a higher pressure with lower circulating volume (6–8% of the body weight) where blood flows through arteries, veins, and capillaries with endothelial lining. This system is present in all cephalopods and vertebrates and shows multiple advantages with respect to an open system. The presence of blood as oxygen (O2) carrier increases the delivery of O2 by 20–40 times and this essential compound, some type of haem pigment, is present in almost all living beings [35].
All vertebrates stem from a common chordate ancestor, and cardiac tubes show sequential segments throughout the evolution of species very similar to the processes that occur during human embryogenesis [36] (Fig. 1). These primitive cardiac tubes consist of the sinus venosus with an atrium for inflow, atrioventricular canal, ventricle, and a conus arteriosus for outflow [27]. The heart modified its shape progressively among different classes of vertebrates [27, 29, 35], specifically: (1) progressive displacement of the inflow structures from caudal to dorsal (fishes) and cephalad (reptiles) position, (2) development of a high pressure left and low-pressure RV, (3) septation of the atrium in right and left cavity (amphibians), (4) septation starting at the interventricular groove separating the left from RV (crocodiles), (5) development of the RV from the proximal part of the conus arteriosus, and (6) disappearance of the sinus venosus (important for providing adequate preload when venous pressure is low (≤ 4 mmHg) in fish and amphibians) and conus arteriosus (which was placed downstream from the gills in fish to smoothen the systolic pulsatility) in birds and mammals (Fig. 1).
Interspecies cardiac anatomy. Timeline from a sequential pumping structure in fish to a univentricle in amphibian and 4 chambered structure with full septation in birds and mammals. Of importance is that birds and mammals independently evolved complete septation since the phylum of mammals took off from early terrestrial vertebrates (around 300 MYA), whereas birds are descendants from reptiles
Another important change during evolution is the type of contractile fiber arrangement. Vertebrates have two types of arrangements: trabeculated, which is predominant in fishes and amphibians, and compact myocardium forming the entire ventricle of birds and mammals [35, 37, 38]. In trabeculated myocardium, there is a random distribution of fibers forming large trabeculations with the spongy appearance of the non-compacted myocardium (as seen in some CHD). Deep lacunae are present between these trabeculations necessary for the O2 supply through diffusion. This type of myocardium functions as an adequate pump, however, generating low pressure (≤ 25 mmHg) [39]. Trabeculated myocardium represents less than 50% of the ventricular wall in reptiles and has fully disappeared in birds and mammals. Compact myocardium is defined by well-organized fiber bundles that are able to generate high pressure but depend on the coronary vasculature for oxygenation. Consistent with their progressive ability to generate high pressures, compact myocardium forms 15–35% of the wall thickness in active fishes (like tuna), and most of the ventricle in reptiles, while the entire ventricles consist of compact myocardium in birds and mammals [38].
Important species in the evolutionary tree and alteration of hemodynamics
Fish have a single circulatory tube with an elastic cone at the aortic root to cope with pulsatility (Windkessel effect) and a unidirectional atrioventricular and outflow valve to prevent backflow. The necessity for higher driving pressures by more active species determines the type of myocardium. More sedentary species have trabeculated myocardium, while more active species (tuna and shark) have compact myocardium with coronary arteries and pressures up to 80 mmHg [40].
In order to allow for adequate O2 exchange at the site of the lungs in species with higher metabolic needs, lower pressures in the pulmonary vascular bed are necessary to prevent edema (particularly in smaller mammals). Therefore, in birds and mammals, a complete separation of the pulmonary and systemic circulation is present [35, 41]. Separated circulations first occurred in octopi and are most pronounced in birds (birds have a higher systolic blood pressure than mammals: 150–170/70 mmHg) as high blood pressure allows for rapid transfer of O2 and nutrients and selective repartition of blood flow according to metabolic needs. Importantly, the process of complete septation evolved separately and independently in birds and mammals since the phylum of mammals took off from early terrestrial vertebrates (around 300 million years ago), whereas birds are descendants from reptiles [29, 36].
Another benefit of complete septation, besides less mixed blood and thus higher arterial O2 tension, is that it allows for thinner alveolar membranes and prevents interstitial fluid leakage. However, a major limitation of separate circulations is the fact that they are completely interdependent and necessitate, besides the reciprocal modification due to respiration of the stroke volume in each ventricle, a complex (auto)regulatory system. Another evolutionary tradeoff is the distance between the heart and the lungs; i.e., their proximity can be explained by basic physics describing that longer vessels cause a loss in pressure. It is important to note that the development of four chambers evolved out of necessity for a closed circuit and that septation occurred separating the same evolutionary ventricle into a right and left side. As such, cardiac embryological origins must have started to differ in both ventricles, however, difficult to determine when those patterns emerged through evolution (Fig. 1).
In summary, processes responsible for cardiac formation are based on very ancient cardiac lineages and within the first few weeks of fetal life, the human heart seems to repeat the evolution of the cardiac morphology which occurred in millions of years from worms to mammals.
Embryology of the RV
The heart is the first organ to be formed during embryogenesis, starts beating on day 21, and is finished by 8 weeks after gestation. The heart formation consists of four key phases: tubular heart formation, cardiac looping, chamber formation, and complete septation with the development of the coronary arteries [42,43,44,45].
RV myocardium derives from where cardiac progenitor cells meet the anterior heart field [44]. At first, the heart tube starts off as a flat sheet of mesodermal cells where cardiac progenitor cells coming from the anterior splanchnic mesoderm migrate to an anterior lateral position thus forming the bilateral heart primordia (primary heart field (PHF)) (Fig. 2) [42, 44, 45]. The cranio-caudal fusing of those paired heart primordia results in the formation of the primary heart tube which starts beating at day 21 [46]. The cranial regions of this heart tube become the ventricles while the caudal sections give rise to the atria. New research provided insight into cells derived from the pharyngeal mesoderm forming the secondary heart field (SHF) [45] (Fig. 2). In fact, the PHF gives rise to the LV, whereas the RV and proximal parts of the outflow tract are derived from the SHF [47]. The relevance of the SHF in cardiogenesis was presented by studies that labeled the secondary heart field by Isl1 expression in Xenopus and zebrafish [48, 49]. Also, homozygous null mice for Isl1 have no looping during cardiac formation where the outflow tract, RV, and a significant portion of the atria do not form [50]. It is currently unknown whether this different embryological origin affects altered loading conditions and possible maladaptation of the RV [16].
Summary of cardiac development in a mouse embryo. At stage E6.5, first cardiac development can be detected where the cardiac mesoderm is formed at the posterior side of the embryo (along the primitive streak). At E7, cells from the cardiac mesoderm migrate towards the anterior side of the embryo thereby forming two distinct progenitor pools called the first heart field (red) and secondary heart field (blue). The first heart field gives rise to the primitive heart tube which will eventually lead to the formation of the LV and parts of both atria. At E8, progenitors from the secondary heart field, which are located behind the primitive heart tube within the pharyngeal mesoderm (grey shade), migrate towards the primitive heart tube and will form the RV, parts of the outflow tract (OFT: which will later be the base of the aorta and pulmonary trunk) and also contribute to both atria. At E9.0, distinct poles at the inflow and outflow regions contribute to the formation of the epicardium, from the pro-epicardial organ (green), and the formation of smooth muscle cells within the aorta and pulmonary arteries, from the cardiac neural crest (yellow) respectively [38, 45]
From this stage on, the heart loops forming a curl-like structure where the atria are connected and the left atrium is in continuity, through the atrioventricular connection, with the univentricle. This primitive ventricle connects to the bulbus cordis which will later form the RV and terminates in, what will be called, the truncus arteriosus [27, 42, 44]. Septation of the atria appears first at the beginning of week 5 and terminates by the end of that week. At the beginning of week 6, the interventricular septum forms, starting at the apex of the single ventricle [42, 44].
Cardiac cell lineages responsible for understanding cardiogenesis are of specific importance when interpreting congenital heart malformations but also in light of cardiac adaptations and failure (Fig. 3). Mesodermal induction, which is quintessential for heart development, is evolutionary conserved and regulated by a number of signaling pathways [52]. The mesoderm-derived PHF and SHF are the predominant sources for cardiomyocyte formation with only a minor contribution from the pro-epicardium [53]. In vivo and in vitro lineage tracings have shown that Isl1+ marked SHF progenitor cells contribute to the formation of cardiomyocytes of the RV and both atria but also vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells [51, 54]. Unlike progenitor cells form the SHF, PHF progenitor cells are marked by the ion-channel hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 4 (Hcn4+) expression and contribute to left ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes [53]. Although still under debate, studies suggest that there is also a contribution to ventricular cardiomyocytes, arising from pre-epicardial cells undergoing epicardium-to-mesenchymal transition, migrating into the myocardium as epicardium derived cells [55, 56]. Interestingly, data from coculture experiments indicated that inductive signals originate from the anterior endoderm rather than from the cardiac mesoderm itself [57, 58]. Additional cardiogenic signals are derived from the organizer region [59] acting directly by inducing cardiogenesis in combination with anterior endodermal signals or indirectly through patterning of the early adjacent endoderm [60]. Earliest responses involve the induction of a core regulatory network which is activated through specific upstream activators from the first and secondary heart field where genes encoding factors of the NK homeodomain, GATA, T-box, and others have been found to exert functions of inductive signals during specification, patterning, and differentiation [60]. As presented in Fig. 3, it appears that most cardiogenic signal pathways (if not all) act in combination with tissue-specific transcriptional cofactors to exert inductive responses [60] reflecting an important expansion of ancestral regulatory genes throughout evolution and eventually cardiac complexity (reviewed in [61]). An explicit advantage of this region-specific control by a diversity of regulatory elements is that the evolutionary adaptation of specific cardiac structures is possible without affecting the whole organ [61, 62]. During the evolution of the human heart, complexity enhanced due to the co-option of different upstream inputs from the core regulatory network. It is this variation in upstream input that explains the development of the RV form the SHF despite the fact that both ventricles rely on the same transcription factors for the activation of the genetic program for cardiomyocyte differentiation [61]. One explicit transcription factor for the SHF is ISl1, however, not being cardiac specific. In order to activate downstream targets, such as the myocyte enhancer factor 2c (Mef2c) gene, it requires co-factors such as GATA and Nkx2-5 expressed in both heart fields. A separate enhancer, Foxh1, acting downstream of Isl1, also activates Mefc2 [63]. Additional genes, such as Fgf8, Fgf10, PITX2, and Tbx1, are also preferentially expressed in the anterior heart field where Tbx1 has recently been shown to regulate the Mef2c gene expression [64].
Inductive signals in primary and secondary heart field leading to the formation of a four chambered heart. Left panel: both upstream regulatory genes, Isl1 and Foxh1 for the SHF (blue) and Nkx2-5 and GATA4 for the PHF (red), activate genes in the core cardiac network (NK2-MEF2-GATA-Tbx-Hand). Right panel: regulatory interactions among transcription factors with intertwinement between the first and secondary heart field. Solid lines indicate direct transcriptional connections while dotted lines represent connections that are indirect or net yet shown to be direct. Adopted from [38, 51]
It may be clear that no “master” regulatory gene is responsible for cardiogenesis and determining the evolutionary intertwinement of those core transcription factors proves to be challenging [61, 65]. Nevertheless, mutations in these core regulatory genes cause a spectrum of congenital heart defects such as atrial and ventricle septum defects and conduction abnormalities caused by mutations in Nkx2-5 [66]. Deletions of a small piece of chromosome 22, more specifically 22q11.2, results in the DiGeorge syndrome with mutations in the Tbx1 gene resulting in the tetralogy of Fallot due to failure of migration of neural crest cells to the heart. On the other hand, mutations in Tbx5 are responsible for Holt-Oram syndrome [66]. Detailed descriptions of cardiac cell lineages are beyond the scope of this article and have been described in some excellent reviews [45, 61, 65].
To summarize, evolutionary pressure favored a closed system with a low resistance pulmonary bed allowing for thin alveoli to favor O2 uptake and a high resistance systemic vascular bed permitting local regulation of O2 delivery. This evolutionary design encompasses progressive septation of the heart, resulting in the building plans of the mammalian (and bird) heart. This blueprint was subsequently maintained across species, independent of lifestyle and habitat, where genetics from 3-chambered to 4-chambered hearts emerged from the same ancestor. Within the first weeks of fetal life, interspecies cardiac evolution is incorporated in embryogenesis where (1) in 20 days, a single tube (worm like) is present; (2) followed by a sequential pumping structure (fish like) with an atrium, ventricle, bulbus cordis, and truncus arteriosus at 28 days; (3) continuing into a two-chambered heart (like amphibians and reptiles at 30 days); and (4) eventually the heart gets fully septated (which is present in the bird, mammals, and crocodilians) by days 35–50. Cardiac regulatory genes have co-evolved during cardiac evolution with upstream signaling cascades that are intertwined, however, with specific genetic profiles for the RV (Fig. 3). One important factor in RV formation is Isl1 which has been suggested as the key element of lineage diversification in the heart [67]. Despite the fact that these cells are not expressed in the RV and RV outflow tract, their function is necessary for the activation of SHF enhancers from both Nkx2-5 and Mef2c genes [65]. It is clear that heart development is controlled by an evolutionarily conserved network of transcription factors which has been expanded and co-opted novel networks making it possible for the downstream alteration of specific cardiac regions, despite the common origin of cardiac precursors and inductive signals.
Right ventricular form and function
Morphology and microarchitecture
In the normal adult heart, the semicircular RV shape is lounged around the LV. The RV has a unique thin-walled triangular (in lateral section) and crescent (in cross section) shape with a sinus (inlet), apex and conus, or infundibulum (outlet), separated by the supraventricular crest. The shape of the RV is further determined by the interventricular septum with a concave shape towards the LV (under normal loading and electrical conditions) which is unaffected by the cardiac cycle. The thin-walled RV is anchored to the LV anteriorly and posteriorly both sharing the interventricular septum. The RV contains coarse trabeculations, a trabecula septomarginalis, providing innervation from the interventricular septum to the base of the anterior papillary muscle, and crista supraventricularis. The latter has a “U-shaped” morphology and is wedged between the tricuspid and pulmonary valve at the junction of the interventricular septum and the RV anterior wall and extends to the sub-pulmonary infundibulum.
Microarchitectural alignment is chamber specific, where the RV, due to different loading conditions with a resultant specific force generation pattern (as discussed below), is composed of superficial and deep muscle layers. This alignment contributes to the complex contraction pattern of the RV including torsion (however almost non-existing compared to the LV), translation, rotation, and thickening [68, 69]. One additional difference in microarchitecture of the RV is the lack of a third circumferential layer, which is necessary for LV reduction in diameter due to higher pressures. The superficial RV layer has fibers with a circumferential orientation, parallel to the atrioventricular groove, that is angulated towards the endocardium and turn obliquely towards the RV apex before continuing into the superficial layer of the LV (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the deep musculature is longitudinally aligned from base to apex. In contrast, the LV has oblique fibers superficially, with circular fibers below, and longitudinally oriented fibers in the sub-endocardium [68]. This specific alignment creates a peristaltic wave from the sinus to the conus (duration of ~ 25–50 msec [3]) with a major radius of curvature of about 4 cm and a minor radius of curvature of around 0.8 cm [70] and is determined by two major mechanisms. First, a longitudinal shortening, which is the dominant movement of the RV, accounts for approximately 75% of RV contraction and presses the RV free wall against the septum. This creates a bellows effect [6, 15] and allows to generate an adequate stroke volume [68, 69, 71]. Second, this contraction is aided by free wall movement where horizontal fibers synergistically contract (as they pass the interventricular septum) with LV contraction thus emptying the RV into the low-resistance pulmonary circulation. Contrary to its more muscular counterpart, where a specific circular and looping muscular pattern is present, almost no torque (energetic rotation) is present to eject the blood.
Microarchitecture of the normal cardiac ventricles. Panel a shows a normal heart with subepicardial fiber arrangement from circumferential to oblique. Panel b shows the looping of fibers in the deeper layer retaining a circumferential arrangement in the RV, however, changing from oblique to circumferential in the LV. Of importance is the interventricular groove where in the subepicardial layer, myofibers cross and are intertwined between ventricles. From Ho and Nihoyannopoulos [68] (with permission)
Nevertheless, ventricular fiber orientation patterns of both ventricles are intertwined in a complex three-dimensional architecture defining their vectorial (functional) anatomy (Fig. 4), albeit with much controversy on the nature of this arrangement [72, 73]. Up-to-date, two theories exist defining the microarchitecture of the ventricles. On the one hand, there is evidence supporting a three-dimensional myocardial mesh defining a complex arrangement of aggregated cardiomyocytes with heterogeneous morphology where the specific orientation of the units into which they are aggregated, along with their specific loading conditions, dictates the efficacy of mural thickening [73,74,75,76]. On the other hand, much data supporting the myocardial band theory (of Torrent-Guasp) has been presented [77,78,79,80] where the helix is topographically divided into a basal loop and an apical loop running from the root of the pulmonary artery to the beginning of the central fold (i.e., the anterior papillary muscle) and from the central fold to the root of the aorta, respectively. The descendent fibers of the apical loop (after a 180 degrees turn at the central fold) are described to make a 90 degrees turn around the apex (of the LV) and become the ascendant fibers [81].
This specific morphological pattern translates into a specific RV function where volume handling, in respect to the pressure driven LV, is key. In such, in order to build up pressure in the LV, it is capable of creating a “torsion movement” which is created by opposing rotational movements of the base versus the apex. In contrast, the RV anatomical properties prohibit the production of torsion, even when facing extreme afterload [82].
Biomechanical and hemodynamic profile
During fetal life, pulmonary resistance is high and blood is redirected creating a parallel circulation and the RV thus functions as a (low pressure) systemic ventricle. As a consequence, the RV is the dominant chamber in fetal life and accounts for about 60% of the cardiac output; hence, its wall thickness and force generation are equal to the LV [3]. Until the closure of the patent duct, the RV is exposed to systemic vascular resistance, which is more than pulmonary vascular resistance, as evidenced by regional blood flow analyses in fetal lambs [83]. Fetal cardiomyocytes display immature contractile features, featuring the β-myosin heavy chain (MHC) genetic phenotype characterized by lower adenosine triphosphate (ATP) activity and lower filament sliding velocity but with a higher ergonomic cross-bridge force generation than α-MHC [84, 85]. This may be an adaptation to the exposure of the RV to low partial O2 pressure with energy production being based on carbohydrates rather than fatty acids, thus creating glucose, lactate, and pyruvate, and has been suggested to be a feature of immature cardiomyocytes [5, 6]. Major signaling pathways that are activated in the fetal RV include hypoxia-inducible factor-alpha (HIF-α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that not only promote angiogenesis but are also associated with upregulated glycogenesis leading to good tolerance to hypoxia (which is better tolerated compared with the adult) [86,87,88]. Finally, fetal phenotype is associated with adrenergic receptors, calcineurin activity [16], and phosphodiesterase type 5 expression [89].
Immediately after birth, partial O2 pressure and shear stress in the pulmonary circulation increase, leading to the release of vasodilators (like prostacyclin and nitric oxide) and a decrease in secreted vasoconstrictors, such as endothelin-1. As a consequence, the pulmonary vascular resistance drops (and decreases even further later on), thereby decreasing pressures leading to an increase in compliance. Both the reduction in resistance and the increase in compliance contribute to the unloading of the RV [15], resulting in gradual progressive thinning of the RV wall [8]. Concomitantly, over the ensuing period of time, the patent ductus arteriosus closes creating a closed RV-pulmonary circulation circuit. While the RV becomes thin walled, LV mass increases as a result of altered physiology and bio-energetic demands as evidenced by molecular and genetic changes.
Compared with the fetal setting, there are several shifts in physiological processes. First, the metabolic pathway is adapted from glycolysis to fatty acid oxidation resulting in more ATP [90, 91]. Depending on the type of stress, there is a switch to glucose oxidation instead of fatty acid oxidation [5, 92, 93]. Also, due to changes in resistance in pulmonary and systemic beds, oxygen demands alter preferentially shifting regional blood flow to the LV free wall (as compared with the higher regional blood flow in utero of the RV free wall).
The pulmonary vascular bed has a low hydraulic impedance with high compliance. Therefore, the pressure generated by the RV is lower which, according to Laplace’s law, translates into the thickness of the RV free wall of about 3–5 mm (in adults) and a mass that is 1/3 to 1/6 of the LV [8] being 26 ± 5 g/m2 for the RV versus 87 ± 12 g/m2 for the LV [71]. Nevertheless, the RV has a 10–15% larger volume than the LV, of which the infundibulum accounts for approximately 20% of the end-diastolic volume in the normal RV [3]. This specific morphology represents much of the mathematical problems when analyzing and describing hemodynamics [94] compared with the more cylindrical LV and it is imperative to take into account that the ventricles not only share the pericardium, and are therefore confound to the same external forces, but also cardiomyocytes forming the LV and RV. It has even been estimated that roughly 30% of the contractile energy of the RV is generated by the LV [95].
In summary, biomechanics of the RV are complex and differ from the LV in that morphological configuration of the RV is based on a very specific physiological demand. It depends on the insertion of the fibers on the interventricular septum, intertwinement with fibers of the LV, the septum itself, the contraction of the LV, and resultant external forces from the pericardium. It may be clear that sole descriptions of RV contraction patterns (and LV contraction patterns for that matter) are futile and need to be addressed into a bigger multilayer vectorial three-dimensional picture. This being said, caution should be warranted when interpreting such results as it is difficult to match architecture with the existing morphological data [94] and clear definitions of the manner of cardiomyocyte aggregation within its boundaries are necessary [73] where future high-resolution morphological studies could possibly provide better understanding.
Differences between the right and left normal ventricular morphology and physiology are summarized in Table 1.
Pathobiology of remodeling, adaptation, and maladaptation of the RV
Pressure versus volume overload
For many years, pathobiology of the RV was extrapolated from the LV and thus specific knowledge on the response of the RV on altered loading conditions is scarce, let alone, knowledge on increased volume loading [12,13,14,15]. Previous insights ascribed differences between both ventricles to the different structure and different loading conditions; however, as outlined above, those differences begin early on in embryogenesis exerted through specific molecular pathways [8, 18, 27]. Notably, RV failure is not an entity on itself but rather a continuum of clinical symptoms [96] related to severities of disease states in concurrence with previous definitions of HF [6, 97]. Despite the fact that RV failure can develop after ischemia, albeit regional or global, in the clinical setting, it is most often the result of increased afterload [15]. Studies have shown that even a slight acute increase in afterload can lead to profound decreases in RV stroke volume [98, 99]. This difference in ventricular response is particularly present in patients with CHD, more specifically in single ventricle physiology or a systemic RV physiology [19]. Many clinical trials already showed that standard therapy for LV failure does not improve RV failure in CHD [100,101,102,103,104]. Also, long-term survival analyses of single ventricle physiology showed faster progression to failure in the RV compared with the LV [19, 105, 106].
Another important group is represented by patients with longstanding PAH with HFpEF where eventually RV dysfunction develops in about one-third of all patients. This cannot solely be attributed to the afterload mismatch and identifies those patients with an increased risk of death [26, 107]. Moreover, the interventricular progression of the disease is apparent in patients with HFpEF constituting almost half of the patient group with HF [108]. Recent studies show that an important number of these patients display RV dysfunction which is associated with high morbidity and mortality [109, 110]. The group of Obokata presented for the first time that in these patients decline in RV function is coupled with adverse RV remodeling and dilatation [111]. Importantly, longitudinal changes in the right heart structure greatly exceeded the equivalent changes of the LV, and development of RV disease nearly doubled the risk of death in HFpEF [111]. Seemingly, the interventricular connection and function presents a pathophysiological continuum with chamber specific characteristics which we will discuss below.
Adaptations to chronic pressure overload, as evidenced by experimental PAH animal models [12, 16, 112,113,114,115,116,117], start with an acute phase RV dilatation which can be seen as the hallmark of RV failure [16, 17, 87, 118]. The associated increased wall stress consequentially triggers a compensatory RV hypertrophy and is essential in RV adaptation which has been shown to be a strong predictor for outcome in the LV, however, without a clear association in outcome for the RV [119]. Also, long-term studies of patients with, for example, single ventricle physiology show worse outcomes with earlier ventricular failure in systemic RV according to patients with a systemic LV [120]. The transition from adaptive to maladaptive biomechanics is clinically unpredictable and very poorly understood [5] and while many authors make strict divisions between them, recent advances tend to approach this transition as a continuum where accumulating changes in energy expenditure, biomechanics, and molecular pathways eventually tilt the balance towards maladaptation [5, 13]. Those transition phases may provide a good target for further possible interventions; however, minimal data exists.
Clearly, the design of the RV is not optimized for pressure generation, where the thinner wall and lower volume-to-surface-area ratio [3, 6] of the RV make it more compliant to increased preload, though, unable to cope with abrupt increases of pulmonary artery pressures. Every acute increase of preload or afterload instantaneously results in an increase in contractility proportional to its afterload trying to maintain stroke volume. When the increased contractility does not meet the arterial elastance, this ratio declines leading to ventricular-arterial uncoupling which can be seen as a sign of RV failure [12, 15, 121, 122]. This initial reaction normalizes after several minutes with adaptations resulting in increased contractility and normalization of end-diastolic volume [3] and is exerted through mechano-transduction and trophic paracrine signals from the stretched cardiomyocyte leading to changes in integrins, stretch-activated ion-channels and the major sarcomeric protein titin [3, 123, 124]. Interestingly, titin-based passive tension and stiffness are modulated by titin isoform transitions where during prenatal development, titin becomes stiffer (due to decreases in large (N2BA) to small (N2B) titin isoform ratio) [125] and during chronic HF, the isoform ratio can increase and lower titin-based passive tension [126].
Experimental volume loading studies show that RV contractility remains preserved for a long period, although contractile reserve may be compromised [127, 128]. Also, an important consequence of RV volume overload is LV dysfunction, evidenced by the reduced compliance and ejection fraction [3, 128] based on underfilling due to septal displacement and changes in LV geometry rather than a RV forward failure [3, 6]. Correspondingly, reorientation of RV myocardial fibers has been described, dependent on the underlying disease, to sustain RV ejection fraction and more importantly biventricular systolic contraction [129, 130]. Interestingly, patients with Eisenmenger syndrome are doing better and have a better outcome than those with idiopathic PAH possibly due to preconditioning from the prior volume loading or the regression into fetal genetic programming (see below) [6, 13]. However, caution should be warranted as adult survivors with Eisenmenger syndrome present a survival bias which may skew this outcome. The possibility to unload the RV is key where patients with PAH who received a pulmonary-to-systemic shunt (i.e., a Potts shunt)—creating a pop off for the RV—have improved outcomes [131] and, likewise, in the neonatal period, patients rarely die of advanced RV failure due to the open duct. Creating an unloading possibility, through atrioseptectomy, has recently gained more interest and has even been recommended in patients with HFpEF [132, 133]. The same holds true for adults with RV failure as a bridge to lung transplant [134] or as an additional therapy for PAH-associated RV failure where medical treatments fail [135, 136]. It is clear that the underlying mechanism is of importance and selected patients may benefit from unloading; however, the associated drop in systemic O2 tension should outweigh the increase in O2 delivery mediated by the increased cardiac output.
Overall, our understanding of RV response to chronic pressure overload, but also why certain patients are able to adapt and sustain very high pulmonary artery pressures, remains incomplete. In experimental models of RV failure, RV hypertrophy is present however not related to functional adaptation [12, 112, 137, 138]. As discussed by Borgdorff et al. [15], a caveat is present when interpreting experimental results because differences in loading conditions lead to different degrees of RV adaptations and hypertrophy and these studies may therefore not be compared directly [86, 112]. It is clear that, although some aspects of LV and RV cellular biology may be comparable, there are important differences in gene expression, mitochondrial function, energy production, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and angiogenic response to chronically increased workload. Responses to different loading conditions and pathophysiological bases for the development of RV maladaptation and eventually failure will be discussed below. Different adaptations of the RV versus the LV to altered loading conditions are presented in Table 2.
Genetic alterations and molecular pathways
Genetic cardiac morphogenetic analyses already showed a different embryological origin (as discussed above and shown in Fig. 3) where HAND2 expression is necessary for RV formation. In such, the transcription factor Bop is known to be a transcriptional target of Mef2c and GATA4 which are mandatory for HAND2 expression. Also, GATA4 regulates gene expression of α-MHC in the cardiac muscle and the gene encoding for atrial natriuretic peptide [17, 19, 87, 140]. With increased afterload of the RV, gene expression of α-MHC isoform declines, and the slower but energetically more favorable β-MHC is upregulated recapitulating the fetal gene pattern [12, 15, 89, 112, 141]. As reported by Guihare et al., ventricular-arterial uncoupling was strongly associated with the upregulation of β-MHC expression and suggested that dynamic changes in myosin expression may determine RV work efficiency [5, 142] which is correlated with a metabolic shift from fatty acid to glucose oxidation [5]. Interestingly, the change in α-MHC to β-MHC ratio is not related to the degree of RV dysfunction and the question arises whether the switch to a fetal program is an adaptive response to cope with adverse remodeling or whether the switch is rather protective in the decompensating heart. The switch to fetal programs has been addressed in some excellent reviews [141, 143] and years ago, the group of Thompson [144] already established that the transcription factor Nkx2-5 is upregulated which is normally only present in the fetal heart. However, up-to-date, the precise function of this factor and its pathways are incompletely understood [145].
Nevertheless, individual genetic differences play a major role as some patients, with the same degree of afterload, develop more RV hypertrophy than others. Small studies have shown that patients with a non-DD angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism had elevated right atrial pressures and decreased cardiac output [146] suggesting that genetics play a part in controlling RV hypertrophy [6, 147]. The hypertrophic response is induced by several signal pathways (i.e., the calcineurin-NFAT pathway) and resembles that of the LV [15, 16]. However, recent analyses showed that there are important differences in expression of regulatory genes C-fos-induced growth factor (FIGF), transport protein particle (TRAPPAC), and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) in the non-failing RV compared with the LV. But also, in the failing RV, fibrillin 2 (FBN2), CTGF, SPARC-related modular calcium binding 2 (SMOC2), and TRAPP6AC were differentially expressed with respect to the LV [140]. FIGF protein is a member of the platelet- and vascular-derived growth factor which is active in hypoxia-induced angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and endothelial cell growth. In infarcted models, FIGF acts as a profibrogenic mediator stimulating myofibroblast growth and type I collagen synthesis [148] representing the possibility that, if FIGF expression is reduced, physiological remodeling may be impaired [140]. CTGF (also known as CCN2) is a multicellular protein of the family of extracellular matrix-associated heparin-binding proteins and has important roles in cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and angiogenesis [149]. Interestingly, CTGF is important in normal embryological development, however, has been linked to adult pathophysiology of, for example, atherosclerosis and fibrosis [150]. Despite varying results reported on the association between CTGF levels and RV function, the recent findings of Williams et al. suggest that the role of CTGF in fibrosis and cardiomyopathy may be increased in right heart disease and RV failure [140].
As stated, the downregulation of FIGF and upregulation of CTGF may indicate that there are specific differences in response to stress between the LV and RV where inflammation plays a major part [140]. Specific implications of TRAPPAC/TRAPP6AC, SMOC2 (which is active in vascular smooth muscle proliferation and migration), and FBN2 (which functions as part of the extracellular matrix in connective tissue disease) in cardiovascular disease need to be elucidated.
Cellular matrix and development of fibrosis
The extracellular matrix consists predominantly of collagen with relatively small amounts of laminectin, fibronectin, and elastin, and is able to influence the contractile function and morphological configuration of the heart [151,152,153]. Matrix homeostasis is tightly coupled with a myocardial function where increased collagen content (e.g., fibrosis) is strongly linked to the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and degradation of the matrix by metalloproteinases [151, 153,154,155,156]. RV fibrosis in response to increased afterload has been shown in several studies [112, 121, 138]; however, much variation exists in the amount of fibrosis seen in different animal models and time to develop [15]. Moreover, studies evaluating cardiac fibrosis in PAH and chronic thromboembolic PAH show that fibrosis develops in the free wall, the ventricular insertion points, and in the septum (reviewed in [156]). However, contrary to the assessment of the insertion points, the free wall has received less attention due to technical difficulties related to the thin-walled RV [156]. As presented by the group of Andersen, this may create a bias leading to the assumption there is an absence of RV fibrosis in PAH where fibrosis should be seen as a dynamic process and established fibrosis is (partially) reversible [156].
Since fibrosis is closely coupled to end-systolic elastance, it would be interesting to try and alter the fibrotic state; nevertheless, more recently, a study by Borgdorff et al. showed no relationship between the amount of fibrosis and the degree of myocardial dysfunction (as corroborated by the group of Crnkovic et al. [157]). As stated by this group, it would be reasonable to see fibrosis of the RV as a consequence of the adapting and possibly failing RV in response to altered loading condition rather than to implement it in the pathophysiological pathway leading to RV failure [15, 112]. If fibrosis develops, however, it seems to be much less than in the pressure-overloaded LV possibly explaining why RV function recovers in patients after lung transplantation [139]. Studies trying to reduce fibrosis, by using beta-blockade [121], ROS scavengers [116, 158], and prostacyclin [159], also lowered afterload and it is thus impossible to link the effects to a direct interaction on fibrosis [15]. Also, therapeutic strategies targeting fibrosis in LV failure did not improve RV function in RV failure in an experimental setting [160] implying that characteristics of fibrosis are “chamber specific” and further research should explore these differences between the LV and RV.
An important factor correlated to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, contractile dysfunction, and fibrosis in angiotensin II (AngII). The group of Rouleau already showed that AngII-receptors are uncoupled in a rabbit RV hypertrophic model leading to increased levels of AngII with adverse contractility which could be effectively reversed by Ramipril [161]. Also, fibrosis, which is secondary to inhibition of collagen degradation and extracellular matrix inflammation [17], can be altered with the administration of ACE-inhibitors and AngII type 1 receptor blockers [162, 163]. Nevertheless, Borgdorff et al. showed that targeting fibrosis did not affect RV adaptation [160]. Also, the group of van der Bom presented that Valsartan did not affect RV function in the systemic RV [103]. The only drug therapy that showed positive effects in experimental strategies has been beta-blockade [164]. From these observations, trials have shown that the administration of beta-blockade in patients with PAH is safe; however, the efficacy is yet unknown [165]. Furthermore, for pediatric HF patients, beta-blockade has not been shown to be effective and a sub-group analysis in patients with CHD even showed possible adverse outcomes (the study was underpowered) [100].
In summary, cardiomyocyte dysfunction is not the sole factor to transform the hypertrophic RV into a failing one. Chronic overload of the RV leads to extracellular matrix changes which are prominent in patients with PAH; however, fibrosis was minimal in compensated RV hypertrophy [17, 153, 166] and the question is raised if fibrosis should be discussed as part of the pathophysiological pathway.
Blood flow, energy metabolism, and oxidative stress
The right-sided blood supply differs from the left, as it is dependent on the dominance of the coronary system. In 80–85% of the patients, there is a right dominant coronary system supplying most of the RV, that is, the margo acuta by the marginal branches and the posterior wall and inferoseptal region by the posterior interventricular artery. The anterior wall and anteroseptal region of the RV are supplied by the anterior interventricular artery. Given the lower workload of the RV, O2 demand is lower than that of the LV in normal physiology. Also, due to lower pressures in the unstressed RV, coronary blood flow occurs throughout the complete cardiac cycle [15, 167]. Together with the more extensive collateral system (dual delivery), with a major branch of the first septal artery supplying the trabecula septomarginalis, and a more adaptable possibility to extract O2, the RV is relatively much more resistant to irreversible ischemia than is the LV [168]. However, when afterload increases with increased O2 demand, coronary perfusion occurs mainly in diastole [169] leading to a continuous O2 supply-demand imbalance [15]. Also, experimental studies on PAH showed decreased capillary density [121, 138, 159], without beneficial hemodynamic changes when administrating prostacyclin [159], suggesting a decreased coronary vasodilatory reserve. Moreover, the loss of vasodilatory reserve could be involved in the decline of RV function and the involvement of insufficient blood supply to the RV has been supported by Bogaard et al. who showed that chronic pressure overload is not sufficient enough to induce RV failure [17]. Nonetheless, the transition from RV adaptation to RV failure is defined by the occurrence of capillary rarefaction [138] which is a decrease in the number of perfused capillaries in an area of tissue, with decreased expression of VEGF in chronic RV dysfunction [170]. Up-to-date, however, it is still unclear whether RV ischemia is implemented in the transition from the compensated to the failing RV and conflicting reports exist on the role and extent of capillary rarefaction in RV failure. Recent research indicates that early RV remodeling in PAH is associated with RV angiogenesis and preserved RV function [171] while RV maladaptive response to chronic pressure overload is presented as a mismatch between angiogenesis and workload [172]. Furthermore, the same group recently showed that myocyte capillary rarefaction may be a sign of end-stage RV failure, irrespective of the etiology of PAH [173]. Another aspect that needs to be accounted for in the maladaptation of the RV is the modification of the cardiomyocytes. The group of Graham showed that cardiomyocyte modification and decreased substrate delivery is a major driver for RV maladaptation rather than capillary rarefaction [174] and can possibly explain the rapid recovery in RV function after bilateral lung transplantation for PAH. This recovery is too rapid to be explained by changes in RV structure and maybe more consistent with the reversal of intrinsic cardiomyocyte pathologies [174, 175].
Despite the difference in workload in the non-stressed state, energetic profiles of both ventricles are largely the same in terms of glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle, oxidative phosphorylation, cellular aerobic capacity, and volume fraction of mitochondria [19]. However, the RV displays a slightly lower expression of fatty acid-binding protein [176]. Under normal conditions, the adult heart thrives on fatty acids for biosynthesis and energy production [19]. Nevertheless, under stress (i.e., with increased afterload with the onset of hypertrophy), a switch towards glucose and lactate occurs and glucose metabolism shifts from complete oxidation through the Krebs cycle towards glycolysis solely, yielding less ATP but using less O2 per ATP [15]. These alterations may be beneficial during acute stress, however, inadequate for longer maintenance of cardiac metabolism [15, 19, 91]. In respect to volume overload, the few studies that have been performed show an early diastolic dysfunction with preserved systolic function [14] and downregulation of regulators in the ATP production pathway (phosphofructokinase and aconitase) [5, 6, 19]. Nevertheless, studies illustrate that inhibiting fatty acid oxidation through trimetazidine increased cardiac output in a model of mild RV dysfunction due to pulmonary arterial banding [177] and in patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy [178]. The decreased glucose oxidation in the overloaded heart is related to the activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases, which inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase, thus preventing pyruvate from entering the Krebs cycle and increasing reliance on glycolysis for ATP production [19]. Inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases by dichloroacetate has been shown to improve glucose oxidation and RV repolarization, thereby restoring RV function in rats with pulmonary PAH [179]. However, as noted by Borgdorff et al., the concomitant reduction in RV systolic pressure in a fixed afterload (due to banding) complicates the interpretation of these results [15].
Although several studies have reported either increased uptake of labeled glucose analog [180] or increased expression of glycolysis related genes [177, 179, 181,182,183], most of those studies were performed in rats without clinical manifestations of RV failure [15]. No data exists on alterations in substrate utilization (specific in CHD) and further experimental studies are needed in models displaying more severe RV failure. Furthermore, as described in solid tumors [184], chronic pressure overload in the RV also results in suppression of the mitochondrial oxidative function [142, 181]. However, mitochondrial structural changes are not well correlated with the severity of RV dysfunction [17, 142]. Important pathways involved in glycolysis and RV failure are HIF-1α and p38-MAPK [19]. Also, HIF-1α activation is associated with mitochondrial complex II-mediated reactive oxygen (ROS) production [19, 185] as evidenced in monocrotaline-induced hypertensive rats [116]. Furthermore, the increased production of free radicals could in part be counteracted by scavengers in PAH [116, 186]. Nevertheless, the evidence is present that hibernating mitochondrial metabolism is involved in the transition from RV hypertrophy to maladaptation [5, 142]. Recently, the group of Zuurbier used oxygen-dependent quenching of mitochondrial O2 tension to show that in rats with PAH, during the transition to RV failure, there is downregulation of in vivo mitochondrial O2 consumption in the absence of hypoxia [187]. At rest, both RV and LV exhibit the same mitochondrial profiles that only diverge when subjected to increased afterload [19]. Interestingly, when analyzing ROS production in both ventricles, major differences appear. First, when assessing mitochondrial function through its membrane potential, the resting RV shows a lower potential compared with the LV but increases with RV hypertrophy and is mediated through NF-kB [19, 188]. Next, upon increased loading conditions, oxidative stress increases earlier (with an early failing of antioxidant systems) and to a greater extent in the RV as compared with the LV where the redox state remains balanced even at a more advanced stage of failure [19, 189, 190]. In fact, the antioxidant activation pattern in a pressure-overloaded rat model displayed that superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase are not activated at all in the compensated stage [191], predisposing the RV to ROS induced damage at an earlier stage [19]. Furthermore, there also seems to be a difference in ROS sources for both ventricles. In the LV, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) is the primary source of ROS generation while in the RV, both NADPH oxidase and mitochondrial complex II-derived ROS are increased which would suggest greater importance for mitochondrial ROS production in RV failure [19, 116].
This progression from eustress to distress is associated with systemic activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines which accelerates the progression of HF [192]. Such an inflammatory state forms the connection between pressure load and apoptosis and is based on mechanical damage, oxidative stress, and neurohumeral signaling [15]. The group of Testa previously showed that increased levels of circulating cytokines are associated with the NYHA functional class in HF patients [193]. However, up-to-date, it is still unclear whether inflammation forms the basis for the transition from RV adaptation to failure. More specific, as PAH has a multifactorial nature, it is difficult to isolate an initial trigger of RV inflammation. Nonetheless, local stressors and systemic (neurohumeral) cascades could promote a “pro-inflammatory” environment in the overloaded RV [192]. Several studies support this general idea, although based on different experimental models of pressure-induced RV failure. By using a plant-derived alkaloid (MCT) to induce pulmonary EC injury [194], the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily appears to be implemented in the pathogenesis of RV failure through the Nf-kB pathway [195] in progressive MCT-induced PAH, albeit not in the stable form [196]. Also, in studies using pulmonary artery banding, several chemokines were upregulated with isolated (to the RV) increased leukocyte infiltration [197] and a prominent role for the Nf-kB pathway in RV failure [198]. Furthermore, the group of Guihare recently addressed the issue of macrophage infiltration in a rat RV dysfunction model strongly correlating with RV systolic dysfunction [199]. However, the exact role of macrophage infiltration needs further elaboration [153]. Interestingly, when creating a left-to-right shunt-induced PAH model, TNF-α and pro-inflammatory cytokines were also upregulated [200]; however, only TNF-α was solely upregulated in the RV while IL1-a and IL-1b concentrations were increased in both ventricles indicating a progression towards biventricular failure. Whatever the experimental setting may be, it is clear that inflammatory pathways are more commonly dysregulated in RV tissue in both failing and non-failing phenotypes [140].
Overall, a large amount of studies already showed that cellular changes in ventricular remodeling are stimulated by neurohormones (e.g., catecholamines and AngII), inflammatory cytokines, and wall stress which in part are mediated and exacerbated by the oxidative/nitrosative pathway [201]. Based on the different explanations on the transition from RV adaptation to RV failure, it is feasible to assume normal ROS physiology is hampered [202] where the source of ROS production has been a topic of debate. Several studies have indicated xanthine oxidase [203, 204], uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase [205, 206], NADPH oxidase [203, 207], and mitochondria [116, 208] as the primal sources of ROS. However, a discrepancy between the experimental proof of the source and its clinical value exists. For example, uric acid (which is the product of xanthine oxidoreductase) is increased in the failing heart [203, 209] and related to a poor outcome [210]. Nevertheless, trying to inhibit xanthine oxidase showed no real improvement in symptomatic HF patients [211]. More recently, NADPH oxidases have been suggested as a consistent source for concomitant ROS production, more specifically by activation of the catalytic subunit gp91phox and GTP-binding protein Rac1 [116, 212]. Another major source comes from the mitochondrial apparatus [116], though keeping in mind that the produced superoxide itself can result in further production of ROS downstream. This initiates a downwards spiral with, for example, uncoupling of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, thereby producing superoxide instead of nitric oxide [201, 206].
Conclusion
For many years, the RV was deemed to be a lesser contributor to the contractile function of the heart, mainly based on early experiments suggesting that the RV functions as a passive conduit and is subordinate to the LV. Since the Working Group Statement in 2006, progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiological and pathobiological mechanisms of RV failure due to abnormal loading conditions; however, many inconsistencies exist in the literature contributing to the present knowledge hiatus.
It is important to note that the development of four chambers evolved out of necessity for closed circuits with very different mechanical properties and differences between the left and right heart components have been embedded in the genetic profile. Indeed, multiple studies showed significant differences between the RV and LV on a morphological, physiological, and molecular level, resulting in a different adaptation to altered loading conditions and providing a potential explanation for the dissimilar responses of the ventricles to current HF therapies.
RV adaptation to increased afterload is characterized by dilatation, increased contractility, and hypertrophy, whereas the progression to RV failure is characterized by a progressive decline of diastolic function and, despite increased contractility, a disturbed ventricular-arterial coupling. An important part is the inefficient energy metabolism, with a metabolic switch from fatty acid to glucose utilization, which is apparent in RV adaptation; however, its role is still unclear in RV failure. Also, despite its maintained coronary blood flow throughout the cardiac cycle, the diseased RV possibly lacks the necessary increase in capillary density with a loss of coronary vasodilatory reserve. Nevertheless, the role of capillary rarefaction remains controversial and a distinct modification in cardiomyocytes exists with a decreased substrate delivery for a certain amount of workload. This hypoxic environment possibly aids the progression towards RV failure with a lack of antioxidant enzymatic response and amplifying the redox imbalance.
It seems that we are only now at the beginning of our understanding of the (patho)biology of RV remodeling and it is crucial to define specific molecular pathways responsible for this downwards spiral. Better yet, defining precise molecular mechanisms that elucidate the higher susceptibility of CHD patients to progress from a compensated state to overt RV failure would provide a concrete base for the development of “chamber-specific” HF therapies. It may be clear that there is an intertwined ventricular functional continuum within the process of HF and, based on the topics presented in this review, it is our understanding that RV failure forms a separate entity within this spectrum. In such, there should be a theoretical “point of no return” within this continuum of RV maladaptation to failure where our developmental blueprint plays an important role. Future research should therefore include comparative anatomical, developmental biological, and biomechanical approaches in the search for RV specific therapies.
Key points
• Specific coupling between form and function in the right ventricle
• Evolutionary proxies are present in camber formation
• Specific molecular entities determine right ventricular biomechanics
`• Multifactorial approach necessary when describing the right ventricular failure
References
Starr I, Jeffers W, Meade R (1943) The absence of conspicuous increments of venous pressure after severe damage to the right ventricle in dog, with a discussion of the relationship between clinical congestive heart failure and heart disease. Am Heart J 26:11
Kagan A (1952) Dynamic responses of the right ventricle following extensive damage by cauterization. Circulation 5(6):816–823
Sanz J et al (2019) Anatomy, function, and dysfunction of the right ventricle: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 73(12):1463–1482
Fontan F, Baudet E (1971) Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax 26(3):240–248
Guimaron S et al (2018) Current knowledge and recent advances of right ventricular molecular biology and metabolism from congenital heart disease to chronic pulmonary hypertension. Biomed Res Int 2018:1981568
Haddad F et al (2008) Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part II: pathophysiology, clinical importance, and management of right ventricular failure. Circulation 117(13):1717–1731
Konstam MA et al (2018) Evaluation and management of right-sided heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 137(20):e578–e622
Haddad F et al (2008) Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part I: Anatomy, physiology, aging, and functional assessment of the right ventricle. Circulation 117(11):1436–1448
Hunt SA et al (2009) 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation 119(14):e391–e479
Carluccio E et al (2018) Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: superiority of longitudinal strain over tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 11(1):e006894
Naksuk N et al (2018) Right ventricular dysfunction and long-term risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with and without severe left ventricular dysfunction. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 11(6):e006091
Borgdorff MA et al (2012) Sildenafil enhances systolic adaptation, but does not prevent diastolic dysfunction, in the pressure-loaded right ventricle. Eur J Heart Fail 14(9):1067–1074
Bartelds B, Borgdorff MAJ, Berger RMF (2014) Right ventricular adaptation in congenital heart diseases. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis:1(83)
Reddy S et al (2013) Physiologic and molecular characterization of a murine model of right ventricular volume overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 304(10):H1314–H1327
Borgdorff MA et al (2015) Right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: what have we learned in animal models since the NIH working group statement? Heart Fail Rev 20(4):475–491
Bartelds B et al (2011) Differential responses of the right ventricle to abnormal loading conditions in mice: pressure vs. volume load. Eur J Heart Fail 13(12):1275–1282
Bogaard HJ et al (2009) The right ventricle under pressure: cellular and molecular mechanisms of right-heart failure in pulmonary hypertension. Chest 135(3):794–804
Friedberg MK, Redington AN (2014) Right versus left ventricular failure: differences, similarities, and interactions. Circulation 129(9):1033–1044
Reddy S, Bernstein D (2015) Molecular Mechanisms of Right Ventricular Failure. Circulation 132(18):1734–1742
Willemen E et al (2019) The left and right ventricles respond differently to variation of pacing delays in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a combined experimental- computational approach. Front Physiol 10:17
van de Veerdonk MC et al (2011) Progressive right ventricular dysfunction in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension responding to therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(24):2511–2519
Nagendran J et al (2007) Phosphodiesterase type 5 is highly expressed in the hypertrophied human right ventricle, and acute inhibition of phosphodiesterase type 5 improves contractility. Circulation 116(3):238–248
Fine NM et al (2013) Outcome prediction by quantitative right ventricular function assessment in 575 subjects evaluated for pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6(5):711–721
Antoni ML et al (2010) Prognostic value of right ventricular function in patients after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3(3):264–271
Ghio S et al (2017) Different correlates but similar prognostic implications for right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 19(7):873–879
Mohammed SF et al (2014) Right ventricular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study. Circulation 130(25):2310–2320
Moorman AF, Christoffels VM (2003) Cardiac chamber formation: development, genes, and evolution. Physiol Rev 83(4):1223–1267
Meijler FL, Meijler TD (2011) Archetype, adaptation and the mammalian heart. Neth Heart J 19(3):142–148
Simoes-Costa MS et al (2005) The evolutionary origin of cardiac chambers. Dev Biol 277(1):1–15
Taverne YJ et al (2018) Reactive oxygen species: radical factors in the evolution of animal life: a molecular timescale from Earth’s earliest history to the rise of complex life. Bioessays:40(3)
Bishopric NH (2005) Evolution of the heart from bacteria to man. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1047:13–29
Weil A (2002) Mammalian evolution: upwards and onwards. Nature 416(6883):798–799
Luo ZX (2007) Transformation and diversification in early mammal evolution. Nature 450(7172):1011–1019
Boogerd CJ, Moorman AF, Barnett P (2009) Protein interactions at the heart of cardiac chamber formation. Ann Anat 191(6):505–517
Bettex DA, Pretre R, Chassot PG (2014) Is our heart a well-designed pump? The heart along animal evolution. Eur Heart J 35(34):2322–2332
Xavier-Neto J et al (2007) Parallel avenues in the evolution of hearts and pumping organs. Cell Mol Life Sci 64(6):719–734
Victor S, Nayak VM, Rajasingh R (1999) Evolution of the ventricles. Tex Heart Inst J 26(3):168–175 discussion 175-6
Martynova MG (2004) Proliferation and differentiation processes in the heart muscle elements in different phylogenetic groups. Int Rev Cytol 235:215–250
Sanchez-Quintana D et al (1996) Myocardial fiber and connective tissue architecture in the fish heart ventricle. J Exper Zool 275(2-3):112–124
Simões K et al (2002) Myoarchitecture and vasculature of the heart ventricle in some freshwater teleosts. J Anat 200(5):467–475
Seymour RS et al (2004) Evidence for endothermic ancestors of crocodiles at the stem of archosaur evolution. Physiol Biochem Zool 77(6):1051–1067
van den Berg G, Moorman AF (2009) Concepts of cardiac development in retrospect. Pediatr Cardiol 30(5):580–587
Yutzey KE, Kirby ML (2002) Wherefore heart thou? Embryonic origins of cardiogenic mesoderm. Dev Dyn 223(3):307–320
Sedmera D (2011) Function and form in the developing cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc Res 91(2):252–259
Srivastava D, Olson EN (2000) A genetic blueprint for cardiac development. Nature 407(6801):221–226
Farha S, Lundgrin EL, Erzurum SC (2013) Novel therapeutic approaches to preserve the right ventricle. Curr Heart Fail Rep 10(1):12–17
Zaffran S et al (2004) Right ventricular myocardium derives from the anterior heart field. Circ Res 95(3):261–268
Hami D et al (2011) Zebrafish cardiac development requires a conserved secondary heart field. Development 138(11):2389–2398
Kelly RG, Buckingham ME, Moorman AF (2014) Heart fields and cardiac morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med:4(10)
Francou A et al (2013) Second heart field cardiac progenitor cells in the early mouse embryo. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833(4):795–798
Moretti A et al (2006) Multipotent embryonic Isl1(+) progenitor cells lead to cardiac, smooth muscle, and endothelial cell diversification. Cell 127(6):1151–1165
Brade T et al (2013) Embryonic heart progenitors and cardiogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine:3(10)
Spater D et al (2014) How to make a cardiomyocyte. Development 141(23):4418–4431
Bu L et al (2009) Human ISL1 heart progenitors generate diverse multipotent cardiovascular cell lineages. Nature 460(7251):113–U130
Cai CL et al (2008) A myocardial lineage derives from Tbx18 epicardial cells. Nature 454(7200):104–1U4
Christoffels VM et al (2009) Tbx18 and the fate of epicardial progenitors. Nature 458(7240):E8–E9
Schultheiss TM, Xydas S, Lassar AB (1995) Induction of avian cardiac myogenesis by anterior endoderm. Development 121(12):4203–4214
Yatskievych TA, Ladd AN, Antin PB (1997) Induction of cardiac myogenesis in avian pregastrula epiblast: the role of the hypoblast and activin. Development 124(13):2561–2570
Sater AK, Jacobson AG (1990) The role of the dorsal lip in the induction of heart mesoderm in Xenopus-laevis. Development 108(3):461–470
Zaffran S, Frasch M (2002) Early signals in cardiac development. Circulation Research 91(6):457–469
Olson EN (2006) Gene regulatory networks in the evolution and development of the heart. Science 313(5795):1922–1927
Schwartz RJ, Olson EN (1999) Building the heart piece by piece: modularity of cis-elements regulating Nkx2-5 transcription. Development 126(19):4187–4192
von Both I et al (2004) Foxh1 is essential for development of the anterior heart field. Developmental Cell 7(3):331–345
Pane LS et al (2018) Tbx1 represses Mef2c gene expression and is correlated with histone 3 deacetylation of the anterior heart field enhancer. Disease Models & Mechanisms:11(9)
Brand T (2003) Heart development: molecular insights into cardiac specification and early morphogenesis. Dev Biol 258(1):1–19
Boogerd CJ et al (2010) Functional analysis of novel TBX5 T-box mutations associated with Holt-Oram syndrome. Cardiovasc Res 88(1):130–139
Laugwitz KL et al (2005) Postnatal isl1+ cardioblasts enter fully differentiated cardiomyocyte lineages. Nature 433(7026):647–653
Ho SY, Nihoyannopoulos P (2006) Anatomy, echocardiography, and normal right ventricular dimensions. Heart 92(Suppl 1):i2–i13
Naeije R, Brimioulle S, Dewachter L (2014) Biomechanics of the right ventricle in health and disease (2013 Grover Conference series). Pulm Circ 4(3):395–406
Geva T et al (1998) Evaluation of regional differences in right ventricular systolic function by acoustic quantification echocardiography and cine magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 98(4):339–345
Foschi, M., et al., The dark side of the moon: the right ventricle. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis, 2017. 4(4).
Austin EH 3rd (2007) The ventricular myocardial band of Torrent-Guasp - the controversy: an editorial. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu:87–88
Stephenson RS et al (2018) Resolving the true ventricular mural architecture. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis:5(2)
Anderson RH et al (2005) The anatomical arrangement of the myocardial cells making up the ventricular mass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28(4):517–525
Lunkenheimer PP et al (2006) Three-dimensional architecture of the left ventricular myocardium. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 288(6):565–578
Lunkenheimer PP et al (2006) The myocardium and its fibrous matrix working in concert as a spatially netted mesh: a critical review of the purported tertiary structure of the ventricular mass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29(Suppl 1):S41–S49
Poveda F et al (2013) Helical structure of the cardiac ventricular anatomy assessed by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging with multiresolution tractography. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 66(10):782–790
Corno AF, Kocica MJ (2007) Potential implications of the helical heart in congenital heart defects. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu:61–67
Kocica MJ et al (2007) The helical ventricular myocardial band of Torrent-Guasp. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu:52–60
Kocica MJ et al (2006) The helical ventricular myocardial band: global, three-dimensional, functional architecture of the ventricular myocardium. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29(Suppl 1):S21–S40
Torrent-Guasp F et al (2001) The structure and function of the helical heart and its buttress wrapping. I. The normal macroscopic structure of the heart. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13(4):301–319
Pettersen E et al (2007) Contraction pattern of the systemic right ventricle shift from longitudinal to circumferential shortening and absent global ventricular torsion. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(25):2450–2456
Fisher DJ, Heymann MA, Rudolph AM (1982) Regional myocardial blood flow and oxygen delivery in fetal, newborn, and adult sheep. Am J Physiol 243(5):H729–H731
Harris DE et al (1994) Smooth, cardiac and skeletal muscle myosin force and motion generation assessed by cross-bridge mechanical interactions in vitro. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 15(1):11–19
Sugiura S et al (1998) Comparison of unitary displacements and forces between 2 cardiac myosin isoforms by the optical trap technique: molecular basis for cardiac adaptation. Circ Res 82(10):1029–1034
Sutendra G et al (2013) A metabolic remodeling in right ventricular hypertrophy is associated with decreased angiogenesis and a transition from a compensated to a decompensated state in pulmonary hypertension. J Mol Med (Berl) 91(11):1315–1327
Voelkel NF et al (2006) Right ventricular function and failure: report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group on cellular and molecular mechanisms of right heart failure. Circulation 114(17):1883–1891
Kelly RG (2007) Building the right ventricle. Circ Res 100(7):943–945
Schafer S et al (2009) Chronic inhibition of phosphodiesterase 5 does not prevent pressure-overload-induced right-ventricular remodelling. Cardiovasc Res 82(1):30–39
Altin SE, Schulze PC (2012) Metabolism of the right ventricle and the response to hypertrophy and failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 55(2):229–233
Bartelds B et al (2000) Perinatal changes in myocardial metabolism in lambs. Circulation 102(8):926–931
Smith RL et al (2018) Metabolic flexibility as an adaptation to energy resources and requirements in health and disease. Endocr Rev 39(4):489–517
Goodpaster BH, Sparks LM (2017) Metabolic flexibility in health and disease. Cell Metab 25(5):1027–1036
Geenen LW et al (2019) Exploring the prognostic value of novel markers in adults with a systemic right ventricle. J Am Heart Assoc 8(17):e013745
Damiano RJ Jr et al (1991) Significant left ventricular contribution to right ventricular systolic function. Am J Physiol 261(5 Pt 2):H1514–H1524
Burke MA et al (2014) Prognostic importance of pathophysiologic markers in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 7(2):288–299
Sagawa K (1988) Cardiac contraction and the pressure-volume relationship. Oxford University Press. xv, New York, 480 p
Pinsky MR (2016) The right ventricle: interaction with the pulmonary circulation. Crit Care 20:266
Redington AN (2014) Low cardiac output due to acute right ventricular dysfunction and cardiopulmonary interactions in congenital heart disease (2013 Grover Conference series). Pulm Circ 4(2):191–199
Shaddy RE et al (2007) Carvedilol for children and adolescents with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 298(10):1171–1179
Norozi K et al (2007) A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of beta-blockade in patients who have undergone surgical correction of tetralogy of Fallot. Cardiol Young 17(4):372–379
Hsu DT et al (2010) Enalapril in infants with single ventricle: results of a multicenter randomized trial. Circulation 122(4):333–340
van der Bom T et al (2013) Effect of valsartan on systemic right ventricular function: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Circulation 127(3):322–330
Dore A et al (2005) Angiotensin receptor blockade and exercise capacity in adults with systemic right ventricles: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Circulation 112(16):2411–2416
Nakamura Y et al (2011) Ventricular performance in long-term survivors after Fontan operation. Ann Thorac Surg 91(1):172–180
Alsoufi B et al (2016) The impact of dominant ventricle morphology on palliation outcomes of single ventricle anomalies. Ann Thorac Surg 102(2):593–601
Melenovsky V et al (2014) Right heart dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 35(48):3452–3462
Reddy YN, Borlaug BA (2016) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Curr Probl Cardiol 41(4):145–188
Gorter TM et al (2018) Right heart dysfunction and failure in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: mechanisms and management. Position statement on behalf of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 20(1):16–37
Hussain I et al (2016) Impaired right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling and effect of sildenafil in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an ancillary analysis from the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition to improve clinical status and exercise capacity in diastolic heart failure (RELAX) trial. Circ Heart Fail 9(4):e002729
Obokata M et al (2019) Deterioration in right ventricular structure and function over time in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 40(8):689–697
Borgdorff MA et al (2013) Distinct loading conditions reveal various patterns of right ventricular adaptation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 305:354–364
Piao L et al (2012) GRK2-mediated inhibition of adrenergic and dopaminergic signaling in right ventricular hypertrophy: therapeutic implications in pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 126(24):2859–2869
de Vroomen M et al (2000) Improved contractile performance of right ventricle in response to increased RV afterload in newborn lamb. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278(1):H100–H105
Hessel MH et al (2006) Characterization of right ventricular function after monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension in the intact rat. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291(5):H2424–H2430
Redout EM et al (2007) Right-ventricular failure is associated with increased mitochondrial complex II activity and production of reactive oxygen species. Cardiovasc Res 75(4):770–781
Kreymborg K et al (2010) Identification of right heart-enriched genes in a murine model of chronic outflow tract obstruction. J Mol Cell Cardiol 49(4):598–605
van Wolferen SA et al (2007) Prognostic value of right ventricular mass, volume, and function in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 28(10):1250–1257
van Berlo JH, Maillet M, Molkentin JD (2013) Signaling effectors underlying pathologic growth and remodeling of the heart. J Clin Invest 123(1):37–45
Gentles TL et al (1997) Fontan operation in five hundred consecutive patients: factors influencing early and late outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 114(3):376–391
de Man FS et al (2012) Bisoprolol delays progression towards right heart failure in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Circ Heart Fail 5(1):97–105
Brimioulle S, Wauthy P, Naeije R (2005) Single-beat evaluation of right ventricular contractility. Crit Care Med 33(4):917–918 author reply 918
Lyon RC et al (2015) Mechanotransduction in cardiac hypertrophy and failure. Circ Res 116(8):1462–1476
Sanada S et al (2007) IL-33 and ST2 comprise a critical biomechanically induced and cardioprotective signaling system. J Clin Invest 117(6):1538–1549
Opitz CA et al (2004) Developmentally regulated switching of titin size alters myofibrillar stiffness in the perinatal heart. Circ Res 94(7):967–975
Kruger M, Linke WA (2011) The giant protein titin: a regulatory node that integrates myocyte signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 286(12):9905–9912
Szabo G et al (2006) Adaptation of the right ventricle to an increased afterload in the chronically volume overloaded heart. Ann Thorac Surg 82(3):989–995
Kuehne T et al (2003) Effects of pulmonary insufficiency on biventricular function in the developing heart of growing swine. Circulation 108(16):2007–2013
Menting ME et al (2015) Ventricular myocardial deformation in adults after early surgical repair of atrial septal defect. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(5):549–557
Dragulescu A et al (2013) Differential effect of right ventricular dilatation on myocardial deformation in patients with atrial septal defects and patients after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Int J Cardiol 168(2):803–810
Baruteau AE et al (2012) Potts shunt in children with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 94(3):817–824
Ponikowski P et al (2016) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail, 2016. 18(8):891–975
Kaye DM et al (2016) One-year outcomes after transcatheter insertion of an interatrial shunt device for the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail:9(12)
Rothman A et al (1999) Atrial septostomy as a bridge to lung transplantation in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension. American Journal of Cardiology 84(6):682–686
Sandoval J et al (2011) Effect of atrial septostomy on the survival of patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 38(6):1343–1348
Bauer A et al (2018) Creation of a restrictive atrial communication in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH): effective palliation of syncope and end-stage heart failure. Pulmonary Circulation:8(2)
Faber MJ et al (2006) Right and left ventricular function after chronic pulmonary artery banding in rats assessed with biventricular pressure-volume loops. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291(4):H1580–H1586
Bogaard HJ et al (2009) Chronic pulmonary artery pressure elevation is insufficient to explain right heart failure. Circulation 120(20):1951–1960
Vonk Noordegraaf A et al (2019) Pathophysiology of the right ventricle and of the pulmonary circulation in pulmonary hypertension: an update. Eur Respir J:53(1)
Williams JL et al (2018) Defining the molecular signatures of human right heart failure. Life Sci 196:118–126
Nandi SS, Mishra PK (2015) Harnessing fetal and adult genetic reprograming for therapy of heart disease. J Nat Sci:1(4)
Guihaire J et al (2014) Right ventricular plasticity in a porcine model of chronic pressure overload. J Heart Lung Transplant 33(2):194–202
Dirkx E, da Costa Martins PA, De Windt LJ (2013) Regulation of fetal gene expression in heart failure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1832(12):2414–2424
Thompson JT, Rackley MS, O’Brien TX (1998) Upregulation of the cardiac homeobox gene Nkx2-5 (CSX) in feline right ventricular pressure overload. Am J Physiol 274(5 Pt 2):H1569–H1573
Pashmforoush M et al (2004) Nkx2-5 pathways and congenital heart disease; loss of ventricular myocyte lineage specification leads to progressive cardiomyopathy and complete heart block. Cell 117(3):373–386
Abraham WT et al (2003) Angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension: increased frequency and association with preserved haemodynamics. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 4(1):27–30
Guo X et al (2017) The clinical features, outcomes and genetic characteristics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with severe right ventricular hypertrophy. PLoS One 12(3):e0174118
Zhao TQ et al (2013) Differential expression of vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms and receptor subtypes in the infarcted heart. International Journal of Cardiology 167(6):2638–2645
Hall-Glenn F, Lyons KM (2011) Roles for CCN2 in normal physiological processes. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 68(19):3209–3217
Chen CC, Lau LF (2009) Functions and mechanisms of action of CCN matricellular proteins. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 41(4):771–783
Janicki JS et al (2006) Cardiac mast cell regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-related ventricular remodeling in chronic pressure or volume overload. Cardiovasc Res 69(3):657–665
Kohler D et al (2013) Right ventricular failure and pathobiology in patients with congenital heart disease - implications for long-term follow-up. Front Pediatr 1:37
Frangogiannis NG (2017) Fibroblasts and the extracellular matrix in right ventricular disease. Cardiovasc Res 113(12):1453–1464
Khan R, Sheppard R (2006) Fibrosis in heart disease: understanding the role of transforming growth factor-beta in cardiomyopathy, valvular disease and arrhythmia. Immunology 118(1):10–24
Baicu CF et al (2003) Changes in extracellular collagen matrix alter myocardial systolic performance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284(1):H122–H132
Andersen S et al (2019) Right ventricular fibrosis. Circulation 139(2):269–285
Crnkovic S et al (2019) Disconnect between fibrotic response and right ventricular dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199(12):1550–1560
Redout EM et al (2010) Antioxidant treatment attenuates pulmonary arterial hypertension-induced heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298(3):H1038–H1047
van Albada ME et al (2006) Prostacyclin therapy increases right ventricular capillarisation in a model for flow-associated pulmonary hypertension. Eur J Pharmacol 549(1-3):107–116
Borgdorff MA et al (2013) A cornerstone of heart failure treatment is not effective in experimental right ventricular failure. Int J Cardiol 169(3):183–189
Rouleau JL et al (2001) Cardioprotective effects of ramipril and losartan in right ventricular pressure overload in the rabbit: importance of kinins and influence on angiotensin II type 1 receptor signaling pathway. Circulation 104(8):939–944
Ahn BH et al (2003) Estrogen and enalapril attenuate the development of right ventricular hypertrophy induced by monocrotaline in ovariectomized rats. J Korean Med Sci 18(5):641–648
Yoshiyama M et al (1998) Effect of cilazapril on ventricular remodeling assessed by Doppler-echocardiographic assessment and cardiac gene expression. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 12(1):57–70
Bogaard HJ et al (2010) Adrenergic receptor blockade reverses right heart remodeling and dysfunction in pulmonary hypertensive rats. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182(5):652–660
Farha S et al (2017) Pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment with carvedilol for heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JCI Insight:2(16)
Lowes BD et al (1997) Changes in gene expression in the intact human heart. Downregulation of alpha-myosin heavy chain in hypertrophied, failing ventricular myocardium. J Clin Invest 100(9):2315–2324
Zong P, Tune JD, Downey HF (2005) Mechanisms of oxygen demand/supply balance in the right ventricle. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 230(8):507–519
Masci PG et al (2010) Right ventricular ischemic injury in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: characterization with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 122(14):1405–1412
Wong YY et al (2011) Right ventricular failure in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension is associated with inefficient myocardial oxygen utilization. Circ Heart Fail 4(6):700–706
Mohammed SF et al (2015) Coronary microvascular rarefaction and myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 131(6):550–559
Kolb TM, Hassoun PM (2018) Supply and demand: micro(vascular) economics of the right ventricle in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 59(4):410–411
Noly PE et al (2017) The importance of capillary density-stroke work mismatch for right ventricular adaptation to chronic pressure overload. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 154(6):2070–2079
Noly PE et al (2019) Capillary density in right ventricular myocardium in congenital heart disease. J Heart Lung Transplant 38(3):328–331
Graham BB et al (2018) Vascular adaptation of the right ventricle in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 59(4):479–489
Katz WE et al (1996) Immediate effects of lung transplantation on right ventricular morphology and function in patients with variable degrees of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 27(2):384–391
Phillips D et al (2011) Homogenous protein programming in the mammalian left and right ventricle free walls. Physiol Genomics 43(21):1198–1206
Fang YH et al (2012) Therapeutic inhibition of fatty acid oxidation in right ventricular hypertrophy: exploiting Randle’s cycle. J Mol Med (Berl) 90(1):31–43
Gunes Y et al (2009) Improved left and right ventricular functions with trimetazidine in patients with heart failure: a tissue Doppler study. Heart Vessels 24(4):277–282
Piao L et al (2010) The inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase improves impaired cardiac function and electrical remodeling in two models of right ventricular hypertrophy: resuscitating the hibernating right ventricle. J Mol Med (Berl) 88(1):47–60
Oikawa M et al (2005) Increased [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in right ventricular free wall in patients with pulmonary hypertension and the effect of epoprostenol. J Am Coll Cardiol 45(11):1849–1855
Michelakis ED et al (2002) Dichloroacetate, a metabolic modulator, prevents and reverses chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in rats: role of increased expression and activity of voltage-gated potassium channels. Circulation 105(2):244–250
Piao L, Marsboom G, Archer SL (2010) Mitochondrial metabolic adaptation in right ventricular hypertrophy and failure. J Mol Med (Berl) 88(10):1011–1020
Faber MJ et al (2005) Proteomic changes in the pressure overloaded right ventricle after 6 weeks in young rats: correlations with the degree of hypertrophy. Proteomics 5(10):2519–2530
Zong WX, Rabinowitz JD, White E (2016) Mitochondria and cancer. Mol Cell 61(5):667–676
Semenza GL (2011) Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: regulator of mitochondrial metabolism and mediator of ischemic preconditioning. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813(7):1263–1268
Jernigan NL et al (2017) Contribution of reactive oxygen species to the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. PLoS One 12(6):e0180455
Balestra GM et al (2015) Increased in vivo mitochondrial oxygenation with right ventricular failure induced by pulmonary arterial hypertension: mitochondrial inhibition as driver of cardiac failure? Respir Res 16:6
Nagendran J et al (2008) A dynamic and chamber-specific mitochondrial remodeling in right ventricular hypertrophy can be therapeutically targeted. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136(1):168-78, 178 e1-3
Gomez-Arroyo J et al (2013) Metabolic gene remodeling and mitochondrial dysfunction in failing right ventricular hypertrophy secondary to pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Heart Fail 6(1):136–144
Tsutsui H et al (2001) Greater susceptibility of failing cardiac myocytes to oxygen free radical-mediated injury. Cardiovasc Res 49(1):103–109
Ecarnot-Laubriet A et al (2003) The activation pattern of the antioxidant enzymes in the right ventricle of rat in response to pressure overload is of heart failure type. Heart Dis 5(5):308–312
Sun XQ, Abbate A, Bogaard HJ (2017) Role of cardiac inflammation in right ventricular failure. Cardiovasc Res 113(12):1441–1452
Testa M et al (1996) Circulating levels of cytokines and their endogenous modulators in patients with mild to severe congestive heart failure due to coronary artery disease or hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 28(4):964–971
Stenmark KR et al (2009) Animal models of pulmonary arterial hypertension: the hope for etiological discovery and pharmacological cure. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 297(6):L1013–L1032
Nogueira-Ferreira R et al (2016) Exercise preconditioning prevents MCT-induced right ventricle remodeling through the regulation of TNF superfamily cytokines. Int J Cardiol 203:858–866
Brown MB et al (2017) High-intensity interval training, but not continuous training, reverses right ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction in a rat model of pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 312(2):R197–R210
Waehre A et al (2012) Chemokines regulate small leucine-rich proteoglycans in the extracellular matrix of the pressure-overloaded right ventricle. J Appl Physiol (1985) 112(8):1372–1382
Gordon JW, Shaw JA, Kirshenbaum LA (2011) Multiple facets of NF-kappaB in the heart: to be or not to NF-kappaB. Circ Res 108(9):1122–1132
Guihaire J et al (2015) Sex Differences in immunology: more severe development of experimental pulmonary hypertension in male rats exposed to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor blockade. Biomed Res Int 2015:765292
Rondelet B et al (2012) Prolonged overcirculation-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension as a cause of right ventricular failure. Eur Heart J 33(8):1017–1026
Taverne YJ et al (2013) Reactive oxygen species and the cardiovascular system. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2013:862423
Stam K et al (2019) Cardiac remodelling in a swine model of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: comparison of right vs. left ventricle. J Physiol 597(17):4465–4480
Wang X, Shults NV, Suzuki YJ (2017) Oxidative profiling of the failing right heart in rats with pulmonary hypertension. PLoS One 12(5):e0176887
Jankov RP et al (2008) Contribution of xanthine oxidase-derived superoxide to chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in neonatal rats. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 294(2):L233–L245
Dubois M et al (2013) Biopterin metabolism and eNOS expression during hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in mice. PLoS One 8(11):e82594
Taverne YJ et al (2012) Nitroso-redox balance in control of coronary vasomotor tone. J Appl Physiol (1985) 112(10):1644–1652
Murdoch CE et al (2006) NADPH oxidase-dependent redox signalling in cardiac hypertrophy, remodelling and failure. Cardiovasc Res 71(2):208–215
Ribeiro Junior RF et al (2018) MitoQ improves mitochondrial dysfunction in heart failure induced by pressure overload. Free Radic Biol Med 117:18–29
Sakai H et al (2006) Serum level of uric acid, partly secreted from the failing heart, is a prognostic marker in patients with congestive heart failure. Circ J 70(8):1006–1011
Ekundayo OJ et al (2010) Association between hyperuricemia and incident heart failure among older adults: a propensity-matched study. Int J Cardiol 142(3):279–287
Hare JM et al (2008) Impact of oxypurinol in patients with symptomatic heart failure. Results of the OPT-CHF study. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(24):2301–2309
Maack C et al (2003) Oxygen free radical release in human failing myocardium is associated with increased activity of rac1-GTPase and represents a target for statin treatment. Circulation 108(13):1567–1574
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Taverne, Y.J.H.J., Sadeghi, A., Bartelds, B. et al. Right ventricular phenotype, function, and failure: a journey from evolution to clinics. Heart Fail Rev 26, 1447–1466 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-09982-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-09982-4