Skip to main content
Log in

Physicochemical Biology and Knowledge Transfer: The Study of the Mechanism of Photosynthesis Between the Two World Wars

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the first decades of the twentieth century, the process of photosynthesis was still a mystery: Plant scientists were able to measure what entered and left a plant, but little was known about the intermediate biochemical and biophysical processes that took place. This state of affairs started to change between the two world wars, when a number of young scientists in Europe and the United States, all of whom identified with the methods and goals of physicochemical biology, selected photosynthesis as a topic of research. The protagonists had much in common: They had studied physics and chemistry (although not necessarily plant physiology) to a high level; they used physicochemical methods to study the basic processes of life; they believed these processes were the same, or very similar, in all life forms; and they were affiliated with institutions that fostered this kind of study. This set of cognitive, methodological, and material resources enabled these protagonists to transfer their knowledge of the concepts and techniques from microbiology and human biochemistry, for example, to the study of plant metabolism. These transfers of knowledge had a great influence on the way in which the biochemistry and biophysics of photosynthesis would be studied over the following decades. Through the use of four historical cases, this paper analyzes these knowledge transfers, as well as the investigative pathways that made them possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On the history of photosynthesis research, see Myers (1974), Höxtermann (1991), Huzisige and Ke (1993), Zallen (1993a, b), Govindjee and Krogmann (2004), Craig (2005), and Nickelsen (2015).

  2. For a survey of what was known about photosynthesis before and around 1920, see the relevant textbooks of the time, e.g. Czapek (1913), Schroeder (1917), Stiles (1925), and Spoehr (1926).

  3. In this paper, the term “mechanism” is used roughly in the sense of the actors’ categories at the time, namely the pathways and the sequence of steps in the light-dependent reactions underlying the physiological phenomena. I believe that there exist constructive links between this contemporary understanding of the term and the “philosophy of mechanisms,” proposed by Bechtel and Richardson (1993) and Machamer, Darden, and Craver (2000), but they need to be explored in another paper.

  4. On these difficulties, see the seminal work by Frederick L. Holmes (1991, 1992) on the history of research in intermediary metabolism. Fruton (1972) also remains informative.

  5. There was, of course, a longer tradition of photosynthesis research in plant physiology, both in the laboratory and in the field, notably that undertaken by scientists in the Desert Laboratory in Tuscon, Arizona. On the latter tradition, see Craig (2005) and Kingsland (2005). For an overview of the American tradition from the perspective of the actors, see Went (1958). However, most of this research did not yet include the investigation of biochemical and biophysical mechanisms on which this paper is focused.

  6. This term was introduced by Holmes (2004).

  7. Warburg first headed the physiological division of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (KWI) for Biology; on this institute, see Sucker (2002). From 1931 onwards, Warburg was director of the newly founded KWI for Cell Physiology; see Werner (1996a).

  8. See Krebs (1972), Werner (1991), and Höxtermann (2001) for biographies of Warburg.

  9. For more information on the Zoological Station, see Groeben and Müller (1975) and Groeben (2005).

  10. On Jacques Loeb’s influence on Warburg and his work in cellular respiration, see Werner (1996a, 1996b), in addition to the biographical literature already cited. The first breakthrough paper was Warburg (1908).

  11. See also Warburg (1914b, p. 320), in which he discusses the advantage of working with cells rather than tissues.

  12. A comprehensive account of his early manometric methods can be found in Warburg’s book on tumor metabolism (1926) and in Krebs’s handbook on general physiology (1928), which was written under Warburg’s supervision.

  13. On the history of using narcotics in respiration studies and the discussion centered on Warburg’s use of these substances, see Werner (1996b, pp. 87–95; 1997, pp. 183–190).

  14. Kok (1960) provides an overview of how the manometric methods that Warburg used in his photosynthesis studies developed over time.

  15. These figures, however, turned out to be inaccurate by a factor of two to three, a mistake that Warburg never acknowledged. In the years after 1945, however, the discrepancy between Warburg’s measurements and those of almost everybody else became the subject of acrimonious controversy; see Nickelsen and Govindjee (2011).

  16. His father had tried to persuade Warburg to study photosynthesis and, in particular, its quantum efficiency, back in 1912. Nothing came of it, though, as Otto Warburg was then too deeply involved in the study of respiration; cf. Nickelsen (2009).

  17. For a philosophical perspective on analogical reasoning, see Bartha (2016).

  18. See the interview with Delbrück in 1978, carried out as part of the Caltech Archives Oral History Project; for his years in Berlin, see Delbrück (1978, pp. 41–60). Delbrück claimed that he was particularly inspired by Bohr’s lecture on “Light and Life”; see Bohr (1933). On the question of how Bohr and Delbrück regarded the relationship between biology and physics, see Roll-Hansen (2011).

  19. The Delbrück club and the paper on the nature of the gene, in particular, became famous primarily through its reception by Erwin Schrödinger and the (not always accurate) reference to this paper in Schrödinger’s lectures of 1944, entitled “What is Life?” From what we know, though, it is highly probable that photosynthesis was equally important as a topic of debate at the club’s gatherings. At least two other photosynthesis experts are reported to have also joined Delbrück’s club (e.g. French 1979, p. 7): the plant physiologist C. Stacy French (1907–1995), who in 1935 was a postdoctoral student in Warburg’s laboratory and later led the Department of Plant Biology at the Carnegie Institution, Stanford (see Craig 2005; Govindjee and Fork 2006), and the physical chemist Eugene Rabinowitch (1901–1973), who was then at the KWI for Physical Chemistry and in 1946 became co-director, with Emerson, of the Photosynthesis Project at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign (see Bannister 1972; Govindjee 2004).

  20. He was soon proven wrong by the development of the theory of resonance energy transfer; see Förster (1950).

  21. For more detail, see Sloan (2011, p. 79). Sloan, however, erroneously assumed that Gaffron and Wohl (1936) had already accepted Cornelis B. van Niel’s generalized equation for photosynthesis (see “Isolated Chloroplasts, Oxygen Generation, and General Biochemistry” section of this paper), including the hypothesis that photosynthetic oxygen came from water. Gaffron himself explained that he delayed accepting the equation primarily out of enormous loyalty to (and admiration for) Warburg at the time; see Gaffron (1969).

  22. Hill succeeded Muriel Wheldale Onslow (1880–1932), a pioneer of biochemistry from 1926 until her untimely death in 1932; see Richmond (2007).

  23. On Keilin’s life and work, see Mann (1964).

  24. Among those who had tried to investigate chlorophyll was the German scientist Alexander Tschirch (1856–1939). In his memoir, Tschirch wrote how he had discovered that it was impossible to study the chemistry of this pigment without clashing fiercely with one’s colleagues: “It is as if there were a goblin sitting in the chlorophyll, who takes great pleasure in setting all those researchers attempting to unravel its mysteries against each other” (1921, p. 182). See Höxtermann (1991).

  25. This assumption only changed in 1941, after experiments with “heavy” water that incorporated the isotope oxygen-18 were conducted. The finding that the isotope ratio of photosynthetically evolved oxygen was identical to that of the water finally provided conclusive evidence that oxygen was produced by the splitting of water; see Ruben et al. (1941).

  26. The “agent” is introduced in the paper on pp. 215–216. See also Friedmann (2004, p. 54).

  27. Kluyver drew attention to this concept in a series of lectures in London, published as Kluyver (1931).

  28. For a timeline of research in anoxygenic photosynthesis, see Gest and Blankenship (2004).

  29. In the same paper, van Niel interpreted the metabolism of the Athiorhodaceae as being analogous to the metabolism of the Thiorhodaceae, although the former used “primarily simple organic substances as hydrogen donors for the photoreduction of carbon dioxide.” Van Niel (1941, p. 281).

  30. See van Niel (1967, p. 10).

  31. These “general” branches of biology were not directly related to the contemporary debates on “general biology”; see Laubichler (2006) and Sucker (2002). These debates were concerned with the role of the organism and its environment (see also Baedke 2018), while general physiologists and others were mostly interested in the proximate causes of cellular processes, which they investigated using the simplest of organisms possible (such as unicellular algae).

  32. The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory conferences were instigated with the purpose of “fostering a closer relationship between biology and the basic sciences” (Harris 1935, preface). Biologists, physicists, chemists, mathematicians, and other scientists were invited to the symposia held each summer to discuss different areas of biological research.

References

  • Allen, Garland E. 1978. Thomas H. Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Olaf S. 2005. A Brief History of the Journal of General Physiology. Journal of General Physiology 125: 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, William. 1991. Experiments. Photosynthesis Research 27: 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baedke, J. 2018. O Organism, Where Art Thou? Old and New Challenges for Organism-Centered Biology. Journal of the History of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9549-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, Thomas T. 1972. The Careers and Contributions of Eugene Rabinowitch. Biophysical Journal 12: 707–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartha, Paul. 2016. Analogy and Analogical Reasoning. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Ed.), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reasoning-analogy/

  • Bechtel, William, and Robert C. Richardson. 1993. Discovering Complexity. Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendall, Derek S. 1994. Robert Hill. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 40: 141–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, Claude. 1878. Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux. Paris: Ballière et Fils.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beyler, Richard H. 2011. Exhuming the Three-Man Paper: Target-Theoretical Research in the 1930s and 1940s. In Creating a Physical Biology: The Three-Man Paper and the Origins of Molecular Biology, eds. Philip R. Sloan and Brandon Fogel, 99–142. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Nils. 1933. Light and Life. Nature 131: 421–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahan, David. 1989. An Institute For an Empire: The Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871–1918. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choules, Lucinda, and Govindjee. 2014. Stories and Photographs of William A. Arnold (1904–2001), A Pioneer of Photosynthesis and A Wonderful Friend. Photosynthesis Research 122: 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, Roderick K. 1965. Molecular Physics in Photosynthesis. New York, NY: Blaisdell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Patricia. 2005. Centennial History of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. Vol. 4: The Department of Plant Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creager, Angela, Elizabeth Lunbeck, and M. Norton Wise, eds. 2007. Science Without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czapek, Friedrich. 1913. Biochemie der Pflanzen. 2nd ed., rev. Jena: Fischer.

  • de Chadarevian, Soraya, and Harmke Kamminga, eds. 1998. Molecularizing Biology and Medicine: New Practices and Alliances, 1910s–1970s. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debru, Claude. 1994. La Photosynthèse: Victor Henri, Otto Warburg, René Wurmser. In Les Sciences Biologiques et Médicales en France 1920–1950, eds. Claude Debru, Jean Gayon, and Jean-Francois Picard, 27–40. Paris: CNRS Éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbrück, Max. 1978. Interview by Carolyn Harding. Pasadena, California, July 14 to September 11, 1978. Oral History Project, California Institute of Technology Archives. Accessed July 31, 2018. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechOH:OH_Delbruck_M.

  • Emerson, Robert, and William Arnold. 1932a. A Separation of the Reactions of Photosynthesis by Means of Intermittent Light. Journal of General Physiology 15: 391–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Robert, and William Arnold. 1932b. The Photochemical Reaction in Photosynthesis. Journal of General Physiology 16: 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fangerau, Heiner. 2010. Spinning the Scientific Web. Jacques Loeb (1859–1924) und sein Programm einer internationalen biomedizinischen Grundlagenforschung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, Theodor. 1950. Fluoreszenz organischer Verbindungen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, C Stacy. 1979. Fifty Years of Photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 30: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, Herbert C. 2004. From “Butyribacterium” to “E. coli”: An Essay on Unity in Biochemistry. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47: 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruton, Joseph S. 1972. Molecules and Life: Historical Essays on the Interplay of Chemistry and Biology. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffron, Hans, and Kurt Wohl. 1936. Zur Theorie der Assimilation. Die Naturwissenschaften 24(81–90): 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaffron, Hans. 1969. Resistance to Knowledge. Plant Physiology 20: 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gest, Harold, and Robert E. Blankenship. 2004. Time Line of Discoveries: Anoxygenic Bacterial Photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 80: 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindjee, 2004. Robert Emerson and Eugene Rabinowitch: Understanding Photosynthesis. In No Boundaries: University of Illinois Vignettes,ed. Lilian Hoddeson, 181–194. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindjee, and David Krogmann. 2004. Discoveries in Oxygenic Photosynthesis (1727–2003): A Perspective. Photosynthesis Research 80: 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindjee, and David Fork. 2006. Charles Stacy French (1907–1995). Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 88: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindjee, Laras O. Björn, and Kärin Nickelsen. 2012. Evolution of the Z-Scheme of Electron Transport in Oxygenic Photosynthesis. In Research for Food, Fuel and Future: 15th International Conference on Photosynthesis, eds. Tingyun Kuang, Lu Congming, and Lixin Zhang, 835–841. Beijing: Zhejiang University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeben, Christiane. 2005. Catalysing Science: The Stazione Zoologica di Napoli as a Place for the Circulation of Scientific Ideas. In Places of Biological Research, eds. Christiane Groeben, Joachim Kaasch, and Michael Kaasch, 53–64. Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeben, Christiane, and Irmgard Müller. 1975. The Naples Zoological Station at the Time of Anton Dohrn. Naples: Stazione Zoologica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Thomas S. 1969. Ideas of Life and Matter: Studies in the History of General Physiology, 600 B.C. to 1900 A.D. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Reginald G. 1935. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. New York, NY: The Biological Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Robin. 1933. Oxygen Affinity of Muscle Haemoglobin. Nature 132: 897–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Robin. 1936. Oxygen Dissociation Curves of Muscle Haemoglobin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 120: 472–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Robin. 1937. Oxygen Evolved by Isolated Chloroplasts. Nature 139: 881–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Robin. 1939. Oxygen Produced by Isolated Chloroplasts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 127: 192–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Robin, and Richard Scarisbrick. 1940. The Reduction of Ferric Oxalate by Isolated Chloroplasts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 129: 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Robin, and Fay Bendall. 1960. Function of the Two Cytochrome Components in Chloroplasts: A Working Hypothesis. Nature 186: 136–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Frederick L. 1991. Hans Krebs: The Formation of a Scientific Life, 1900–1933. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Frederick L. 1992. Between Biology and Medicine: The Formation of Intermediary Metabolism. Four Lectures Delivered at the Internat. Summer School in History of Science, Uppsala, July 1990. Berkeley, CA: Office for History of Science and Technology, University of California Press.

  • Holmes, Frederick L. 2004. Investigative Pathways: Patterns and Stages in the Careers of Experimental Scientists. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann, Peter H. 2002. Hydrogen Metabolism of Green Algae: Discovery and Early Research—A Tribute to Hans Gaffron and His Coworkers. Photosynthesis Research 76: 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höxtermann, Ekkehard. 1991. Photosynthese- und Stoffwechselforschung in der Geschichte der Botanik an der Berliner Universität (18101945). Berlin: Humboldt University (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin).

  • Höxtermann, Ekkehard. 2001. Otto Heinrich Warburg (1883–1970). In Darwin & Co., Eine Geschichte der Biologie in Portraits, eds. Ilse Jahn and Michael Schmitt, vol. 2, 251–274. München:C. H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höxtermann, Ekkehard. 2007. A Comment on Warburg’s Early Understanding of Biocatalysis. Photosynthesis Research 92: 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huzisige, Hirosi, and Bacon Ke. 1993. Dynamics of the History of Photosynthesis Research. Photosynthesis Research 38: 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joliot, Pierre. 1996. René Wurmser (1890–1993). Photosynthesis Research 48: 321–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamminga, Harmke. 1981. 50 Years Ago: van Niel and the Unity of Photosynthesis. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 6: 164–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamminga, Harmke. 1997. Frederick G. Hopkins and the Unification of Biochemistry. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 22: 184–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, A. F., J. W. M. la Rivière, and W. Verhoeven. 1959. Albert Jan Kluyver: His Life and Work. Biographical Memoranda, Selected Papers, Bibliography and Addenda. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, and E. Lily. 1993. The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rise of the New Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland, Sharon. 2005. The Evolution of American Ecology, 1890–2000. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluyver, Albert J. 1924. Unity and Diversity in the Metabolism of Micro-Organisms. In Albert Jan Kluyver: His Life and Work, eds A. F. Kamp, J. W. M. la Rivière, and W. Verhoeven, 186–210. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company. (Translated reprint of: Eenheid en verscheidenhid in de stofwisseling der microben; Chemisch Weekblad 21: 266).

  • Kluyver, Albert J. 1931. The Chemical Activities of Micro-Organisms. London: University of London Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluyver, Albert J., and Hendrik J. L. Donker. 1926. Die Einheit in der Biochemie. Chemie der Zellen und Gewebe: Zeitschrift für die Probleme der Gärung, Atmung und Vitaminforschung 13: 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert E. 1973a. The Background to Otto Warburg’s Conception of the Atmungsferment. Journal of the History of Biology 6: 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert E. 1973b. The Enzyme Theory of Life and the Origins of Biochemistry. Isis 64: 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert E. 1982. From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry: The Making of a Biomedical Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, Bessel. 1960. Efficiency of Photosynthesis. In Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie, ed. André Pirson, pp. 566–633. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, Hans. 1928. Stoffwechsel der Zellen und Gewebe. In Methodik der wissenschaftlichen Biologie. Bd. II: Allgemeine Physiologie, eds. Tibor Péteri and Otto Arnbeck, 1048–1084. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, Hans. 1972. Otto Heinrich Warburg 1883–1970. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 18: 629–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • la Rivière, J. W. M. 1997. The Delft School of Microbiology in Historical Perspective. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 71: 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, Manfred. 2006. Allgemeine Biologie als selbständige Grundwissenschaft und die allgemeinen Grundlagen des Lebens. In Der Hochsitz des Wissens. Das Allgemeine als wissenschaftlicher Wert, eds. Michael Hagner and Manfred Laubichler, 185–205. Zürich: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, Peter, Lindley Darden, and Carl F. Craver. 2000. Thinking About Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T. 1964. David Keilin, 1887–1963. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 10: 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, William. 1976. Unity in Biochemistry. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 1: 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Jack. 1974. Conceptual Developments in Photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 54: 420–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Jack. 1994. The 1932 Experiments. Photosynthesis Research 40: 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Joseph, William Dunn, and Ernest Baldwin, eds. 1949. Hopkins and Biochemistry: 1861–1947. Cambridge: Hefner and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsen, Kärin. 2007. Otto Warburg’s First Approach to Photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 92: 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsen, Kärin. 2009. The Construction of a Scientific Model: Otto Warburg and the Building Block Strategy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40: 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsen, Kärin. 2012. From the Red Drop to the Z-scheme of Photosynthesis. Annalen der Physik 524: A157–A160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsen, Kärin. 2015. Explaining Photosynthesis: Models of Biochemical Mechanisms, 1840–1960. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsen, Kärin. 2017. The Organism Strikes Back. Chlorella Algae and Their Impact on Photosynthesis Research, 1920s–1960s. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39(9): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsen, Kärin, and Govindjee. 2011. The Maximum Quantum Yield Controversy: Otto Warburg and the “Mid West Gang.” Bern: Bern Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Philip J. 1987a. Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Philip J. 1987b. General Physiology and the Discipline of Physiology, 1890–1935. In Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940, ed. Gerald L. Geison, 195–207. New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Wilhelm. 1897. Pflanzenphysiologie. Ein Handbuch der Lehre vom Stoffwechsel und Kraftwechsel in der Pflanze. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, André. 1994. Sixty Years in Algal Physiology and Photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 40: 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitch, Eugene I. 1961. Robert Emerson (1903–1959). Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 25: 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Marsha L. 2007. Muriel Wheldale Onslow and Early Biochemical Genetics. Journal of the History of Biology 40: 389–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 2011. Niels Bohr and Max Delbrück: Balancing Autonomy and Reductionism in Biology. In Creating a Physical Biology: The Three-Man Paper and the Origins of Molecular Biology, eds. Philip R. Sloan and Brandon Fogel, 145–178. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruben, Samuel, Merle Randall, Martin D. Kamen, and James L. Hyde. 1941. Heavy Oxygen as a Tracer in the Study of Photosynthesis. Journal of the American Chemical Society 63: 877–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rürup, Reinhart. 2008. Schicksale und Karrieren. Gedenkbuch für die von den Nationalsozialisten aus der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft vertriebenen Forscherinnen und Forscher. Göttingen: Wallstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Heinrich. 1917. Die Hypothesen über die chemischen Vorgänge bei der Kohlensäure-Assimilation und ihre Grundlagen. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schürch, Caterina. 2017. How Mechanisms Explain Interfield Cooperation: Biological-Chemical Study of Plant Growth Hormones in Utrecht and Pasadena, 1930–1938. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39(3): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, Rivers, Jr. 2000. From Bacteriology to Biochemistry: Albert Jan Kluyver and Chester Werkman at Iowa State. Journal of the History of Biology 33: 141–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, Rivers, Jr., and David R. Singleton. 2017. Remembering Our Forebears. Albert Jan Kluyver and the Unity of Life. Journal of the History of Biology 50: 169–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Philip R. 2011. Biophysics in Berlin: The Delbrück Club. In Creating a Physical Biology: The Three-Man Paper and the Origins of Molecular Biology, eds. Philip R. Sloan and Brandon Fogel, 61–98. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spath, Susan B. 1999. Cornelis B. van Niel and the Culture of Microbiology, 19201965. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Spoehr, Hermann A. 1919. The Development of Conceptions of Photosynthesis Since Ingen-Housz. The Scientific Monthly 9: 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoehr, Hermann A. 1926. Photosynthesis. New York, NY: The Chemical Catalog Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, Walter. 1925. Photosynthesis. The Assimilation of Carbon by Green Plants. London: Longmans/Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltzenberg, Dietrich. 1998. Fritz Haber: Chemiker, Nobelpreisträger, Deutscher, Jude. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sucker, Ulrich. 2002. Das Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Biologie. Seine Gründungsgeschichte, seine problemgeschichtlichen und wissenschaftstheoretischen Voraussetzungen (19111916). Stuttgart: Steiner.

  • Szöllösi-Janze, Margit. 1998. Fritz Haber 1868–1934: Eine Biographie. München: C. H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timoféeff-Ressovsky, Nikolai W., and Max Delbrück. 1936. Strahlengenetische Versuche über sichtbare Mutationen und die Mutabilität einzelner Gene bei Drosophila melangoster. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre 71: 322–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timoféeff-Ressovsky, Nikolai W., Karl G. Zimmer, and Max Delbrück. 1935. Über die Natur der Genmutation und der Genstruktur. Nachrichten der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1: 189–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timoféeff-Ressovsky, Nikolai W., Karl G. Zimmer, and Max Delbrück. 2011. On the Nature of Gene Mutation and Gene Structure. In Creating a Physical Biology: The Three-Man Paper and the Origins of Molecular Biology, ed. Philip R. Sloan, and Brandon Fogel, 222–305. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschirch, Alexander. 1921. Erlebtes und Erstrebtes. Lebenserinnerung. Bonn: Cohen.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Niel, Cornelis B. 1930. Photosynthesis in Bacteria. Contributions to Marine Biology 3: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Niel, Cornelis B. 1935. Photosynthesis of Bacteria. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, ed. Reginald G. Harris, vol. 3, 138–150. Long Island, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory..

    Google Scholar 

  • van Niel, Cornelis B. 1941. The Bacterial Photosyntheses and Their Importance for the General Problem of Photosynthesis. In Advances in Enzymology and Related Subjects, eds. F. F. Nord and C. H. Werkman, 263–328. New York, NY: Interscience Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Niel, Cornelis B. 1949. The “Delft School” and the Rise of General Microbiology. Bacteriological Reviews 13: 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Niel, Cornelis B. 1967. The Education of a Microbiologist: Some Reflections. Annual Review of Microbiology 21: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Emil. 1920. Quantentheoretische Grundlagen der Photochemie. Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie 26: 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Otto H. 1908. Beobachtungen über die Oxydationsprozesse im Seeigelei. Hoppe-Seyler’s Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie 57: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Otto H. 1911. Untersuchungen über die Oxydationsprozesse in lebenden Zellen nach Versuchen am Seeigelei. Münchner Medizinische Wochenschrift 58: 289–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Otto H. 1914a. Über die Rolle des Eisens in der Atmung des Seeigeleis nebst Bemerkungen über einige durch Eisen beschleunigte Oxydationen am Seeigelei. Hoppe-Seyler’s Zeitschrift für Physiologische Chemie 92: 231–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Otto H. 1914b. Beiträge zur Physiologie der Zelle, insbesondere über die Oxydationsgeschwindigkeit in Zellen. Ergebnisse der Physiologie 14: 253–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Otto H. 1919. Über die Geschwindigkeit der photochemischen Kohlensäurezersetzung in lebenden Zellen I. Biochemische Zeitschrift 100: 230–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Otto H. 1920b. Über die Geschwindigkeit der photochemischen Kohlensäurezersetzung in lebenden Zellen II. Biochemische Zeitschrift 103: 188–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Otto H. 1926. Über den Stoffwechsel der Tumore. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Otto H., and Erwin Negelein. 1922. Über den Energieumsatz bei der Kohlensäureassimilation. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 102: 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Otto H., and Erwin Negelein. 1923. Über den Einfluss der Wellenlänge auf den Energieumsatz bei der Kohlensäureassimilation. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 106: 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Went, Frits W. 1958. Fifty Years of Plant Physiology in the U.S.A. In Fifty Years of Botany: Golden Jubilee Volume of the Botanical Society of America, ed. William C. Steere, 615–628. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, Petra. 1991. Ein Genie irrt seltener. Otto Heinrich Warburg, ein Lebensbild in Dokumenten. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, Petra. 1996a. Otto Warburg, Jacques Loeb und die Entstehung der Institutsidee des Kaiser-Wilhelm-Instituts für Zellphysiologie. In Die Kaiser-Wilhelm-/Max-Planck-Gesellschaft und ihre Institute, eds. Bernhard vom Brocke and Hubert Laitko, 319–330. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, Petra. 1996b. Otto Warburg und das Problem der Sauerstoffaktivierung. Marburg: Basiliskenpresse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, Petra. 1997. Learning from an Adversary? Warburg Against Wieland. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 28: 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willstätter, Richard, and Arthur Stoll. 1913. Untersuchungen über Chlorophyll. Methoden und Ergebnisse. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willstätter, Richard, and Arthur Stoll. 1918. Untersuchungen über die Assimilation der Kohlensäure. Sieben Abhandlungen. Berlin: Springer.

  • Wohl, Kurt. 1940. The Mechanism of Photosynthesis in Green Plants. New Phytologist 39: 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, Donald D. 1957. Albert Jan Kluyver (1888–1956). Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 3: 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurmser, René. 1921. Recherches sur l´assimilation chlorophyllienne. Archives des Physique Biologique 1: 33–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zallen, Doris T. 1992. The Rockefeller Foundation and Spectroscopy Research: The Programs at Chicago and Utrecht. Journal of the History of Biology 25: 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zallen, Doris T. 1993a. Redrawing the Boundaries of Molecular Biology: The Case of Photosynthesis. Journal of the History of Biology 26: 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zallen, Doris T. 1993b. The “Light” Organism for the Job: Green Algae and Photosynthesis Research. Journal of the History of Biology 26: 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would first like to thank the editors, Jan Baedke and Christina Brandt, for proposing this thematic special issue and for including my contribution in this compilation, as well as the editors of the JHB for giving me the opportunity to do so. I am grateful to Robert Meunier, David Munns, Raphael Scholl, and Caterina Schürch for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper, and to Margareta Simons, who carefully edited the final version. Finally, I would like to thank the two anonymous referees for their detailed reviews and valuable comments and suggestions. Although their widely divergent opinions made the task of incorporating their recommendations rather challenging, their observations certainly prompted me to rethink and rework the paper thoroughly—hopefully for the better.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kärin Nickelsen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nickelsen, K. Physicochemical Biology and Knowledge Transfer: The Study of the Mechanism of Photosynthesis Between the Two World Wars. J Hist Biol 55, 349–377 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-019-9559-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-019-9559-x

Keywords

Navigation