Abstract
This study presents a new coupling model (CM) of finite element (FE) and peridynamics (PD), in which only very few PD nodes exist. In the coupling model, PD subregion is directly coupled with FE subregion without an overlapped zone, and the force is transferred between PD nodes and finite elements by a connection stiffness matrix. Since dynamic transformation technique is implemented, PD subregion is adaptively generated and evolved, and ensure that the whole damage process is completed. In addition, as an optimization of the coupling model, a densified-material-point model (DMPM) is achieved, which can remove the limitation of element type and enhance the flexibility of the coupling model. As a result, the computational efficiency of coupling algorithms will be greatly improved, and numerical error can be overcome in inferring the damage region. The capability of the developed coupling model was demonstrated by the stretch examples of plates with different discrete cases, and damage analysis was further conducted to demonstrate the strong capability of the DMPM in capturing failure mode.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45:601–620
Bobaru F, Foster JT, Geubelle PH, Silling SA (2016) Handbook of peridynamic modeling. Crc Press, Boca Raton
Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33(20–22):2899–2938
Cheng Z, Zhang G, Wang Y, Bobaru F (2015) A peridynamic model for dynamic fracture in functionally graded materials. Compos Struct 133:529–546
Galvanetto U, Mudric T, Shojaei A, Zaccariotto M (2016) An effective way to couple FEM meshes and peridynamics grids for the solution of static equilibrium problems. Mech Res Commum 76:41–47
Gao Y, Oterkus S (2019) Fully coupled thermomechanical analysis of laminated composites by using ordinary state based peridynamic theory. Compos Struct 207:397–424
Hu YL, Yu Y, Wang H (2014) Peridynamic analytical method for progressive damage in notched composite laminates. Compos Struct 108:801–810
Hu YL, Carvalho N, Madenci E (2015) Peridynamic modeling of delamination growth in composite laminates. Compos Struct 132:610–620
Jin Y, Li L, Jia Y et al (2021) Numerical study of shrinkage and heating induced cracking in concrete materials and influence of inclusion stiffness with peridynamics method. Comput Geotech 133:103998
Jooeun L, Liu W, Hong JW (2016) Impact fracture analysis enhanced by contact of peridynamic and finite element formulations. Int J Impact Eng 87:108–119
Kilic B, Madenci E (2009) Coupling of peridynamic theory and finite element method. J Mech Mater Struct 5:707–733
Liu W, Hong JW (2012) A coupling approach of discretized peridynamics with finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 245–246:163–175
Liu S, Fang G et al (2021) A coupling method of non-ordinary state-based peridynamics and finite element method. Eur J Mech A-Solid 85:104075
Liu S, Fang G, Liang J et al (2021) Study of three-dimensional Euler-Bernoulli beam structures using element-based peridynamic model. Eur J Mech A-Solid 86:104186
Macek RW, Silling SA (2007) Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(15):1169–1178
Madenci E, Oterkus E (2014) Peridynamic theory and its applications. Springer, New York
Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 199(45–48):2765–2778
Ni T, Zaccariotto M, Zhu QZ et al (2019) Static solution of crack propagation problems in peridynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 346:126–151
Ni T, Pesavento F et al (2020) Hybrid FEM and Peridynamic simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in saturated porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 366:113101
Ni T, Pesavento F, Zaccariotto M et al (2021) Numerical simulation of forerunning fracture in saturated porous solids with hybrid FEM/Peridynamic model. Comput Geotech 133:104024
Nooru-Mohamed MB, Schlangen E et al (1993) Experimental and numerical study on the behavior of concrete subjected to biaxial tension and shear. Adv Cem Bas Mater 1:22–37
Ožbolt J, Sharma A (2012) Numerical simulation of dynamic fracture of concrete through uniaxial tension and L-specimen. Eng Fract Mech 85:88–102
Ožbolt J, Bede N, Sharma A, Mayer U (2015) Dynamic fracture of concrete L-specimen: experimental and numerical study. Eng Fract Mech 148:27–41
Qin M, Yang D, Chen W, Yang S (2021) Hydraulic fracturing model of a layered rock mass based on peridynamics. Eng Fract Mech 258:108088
Roth SN, Léger P, Soulaïmani A (2015) A combined XFEM-damage mechanics approach for concrete crack propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:923–955
Shen F, Yu Y, Zhang Q et al (2020) Hybrid model of peridynamics and finite element method for static elastic deformation and brittle fracture analysis. Eng Anal Bound Elem 113:17–25
Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48:175–209
Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 3:1526–1535
Silling SA, Bobaru F (2005) Peridynamic modeling of membranes and fibers. Int J Non Linear Mech 40(2):395–409
Silling SA, Lehoucq RB (2010) Peridynamic theory of solid mechanics. Adv Appl Mech 44:73–168
Wang Y, Waisman H (2016) From diffuse damage to sharp cohesive cracks: a coupled XFEM framework for failure analysis of quasi-brittle materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 299:57–89
Xu XP, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42(9):1397–1434
Yaghoobi A, Chorzepa MG (2017) Fracture analysis of fiber reinforced concrete structures in the micropolar peridynamic analysis framework. Eng Fract Mech 169:238–250
Yang D, He X, Yi S et al (2020a) Coupling of peridynamics with finite elements for brittle crack propagation problems. Theor Appl Fract Mec 107:102505
Yang D, He X, Liu X et al (2020b) A peridynamics-based cohesive zone model (PD-CZM) for predicting cohesive crack propagation. Int J Mech Sci 184:105830
Yang D, He X, Zhu J, Bie Z (2021) A novel damage model in the peridynamics-based cohesive zone method (PD-CZM) for mixed mode fracture with its implicit implementation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 377:113721
Zaccariotto M, Tomas D, Galvanetto U (2017) An enhanced coupling of PD grids to FE meshes. Mech Res Commun 84:125–135
Zaccariotto M, Mudric T et al (2018) Coupling of FEM meshes with peridynamic grids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 330:471–497
Zhang Y, Lackner R, Zeiml M, Mang HA (2015) Strong discontinuity embedded approach with standard SOS formulation: element formulation, energy-based crack-tracking strategy, and validations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 287:335–366
Zhou Z, Li Z, Gao C et al (2021) Peridynamic micro-elastoplastic constitutive model and its application in the failure analysis of rock masses. Comput Geotech 132:104037
Zi C, Belytschko T (2003) New crack-tip elements for XFEM and applications to cohesive cracks. Int J Num Methods Eng 57:2221–2240
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
The element stiffness matrix for quadrilateral elements can be expressed as
where \(\left[ {\mathbf{B}} \right]\) is the strain matrix, \(\left[ {\mathbf{D}} \right]\) is the elastic matrix, \(\left[ {\mathbf{J}} \right]\) is the Jacobian matrix, and t is the thickness of the plate. \((\xi ,\eta )\) is the local coordinate, as shown in Fig.
36.
Each sub-block of the strain matrix and the elastic matrix can be written as
where the determinant of \(\left[ {\mathbf{J}} \right]\) can be expressed as
where \(N_{i}\) represents the shape function and its expression can be obtained as
where \((x_{i} ,y_{i} )\) and \((\xi_{i} ,\eta_{i} )\) represent the coordinate of element node i in reference to the global coordinate system and the local coordinate system, respectively.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Gao, W., Liu, W. et al. A dynamic coupling model of peridynamics and finite elements for progressive damage analysis. Int J Fract 241, 27–52 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-022-00687-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-022-00687-3