Abstract
The modern state of the Pauli exclusion principle studies is discussed. The Pauli exclusion principle can be considered from two viewpoints. On the one hand, it asserts that particles with half-integer spin (fermions) are described by antisymmetric wave functions, and particles with integer spin (bosons) are described by symmetric wave functions. This is a so-called spin-statistics connection. The reasons why the spin-statistics connection exists are still unknown, see discussion in text. On the other hand, according to the Pauli exclusion principle, the permutation symmetry of the total wave functions can be only of two types: symmetric or antisymmetric, all other types of permutation symmetry are forbidden; although the solutions of the Schrödinger equation may belong to any representation of the permutation group, including the multi-dimensional ones. It is demonstrated that the proofs of the Pauli exclusion principle in some textbooks on quantum mechanics are incorrect and, in general, the indistinguishability principle is insensitive to the permutation symmetry of the wave function and cannot be used as a criterion for the verification of the Pauli exclusion principle. Heuristic arguments are given in favor that the existence in nature only the one-dimensional permutation representations (symmetric and antisymmetric) are not accidental. As follows from the analysis of possible scenarios, the permission of multi-dimensional representations of the permutation group leads to contradictions with the concept of particle identity and their independence. Thus, the prohibition of the degenerate permutation states by the Pauli exclusion principle follows from the general physical assumptions underlying quantum theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The matrices of transpositions for all irreducible representations of groups π 2 –π 6 are presented in book [11], Appendix 5.
References
Pauli, W.: Über den Zusammenhang des Abschlusses der Elektronengruppen im Atom mit der Komplexstruktur der Spektren. Z. Phys. 31, 765–783 (1925)
Pauli, W.: Über den Einfluß der Geschwindigkeitsabhängigkeit der Elektronenmasse auf den Zeemaneffekt. Z. Phys. 31, 373–385 (1925)
Uhlenbeck, G.E., Goudsmit, S.: Ersetzung der Hypothese vom unmechanischen Zwang durch eine Forderung bezüglich des inneren Verhaltens jedes einzelnen Elektrons. Naturwissenschaften 13, 953–954 (1925)
van der Waerden, B.L.: Exclusion principle and spin. In: Fierz, M., Weisskopf, V.F. (eds.) Theoretical Physics in the Twentieth Century, pp. 199–244. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1960)
Heisenberg, W.: Mehrkörperproblem und Resonanz in der Quantenmechanik. Z. Phys. 38, 411–426 (1926)
Dirac, P.A.M.: On the theory of quantum mechanics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci. 112, 621–641 (1926)
Dieke, H.G., Babcock, H.D.: The structure of the atmospheric absorption bands of oxygen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 13, 670–678 (1927)
Hilborn, R.C., Yuca, C.L.: Spectroscopic test of the symmetrization postulate for spin-0 nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2844–2847 (1996)
Kaplan, I.G.: Method for finding allowed multiplets in calculation of many-electron systems. Sov. Phys. JETP 24, 114–119 (1967)
Kaplan, I.G., Rodimova, O.B.: Group theoretical classification of states of molecular systems with definite states of its constituent parts. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 10, 690–714 (1976)
Kaplan, I.G.: Symmetry of Many-Electron Systems. Academic Press, New York (1975)
Girardeau, M.D.: Formulation of the many-body problem for composite particles. J. Math. Phys. 4, 1096–1116 (1963)
Girardeau, M.D.: Second-quantization representation for systems of atoms, nuclei, and electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1416–1419 (1971)
Gilbert, J.D.: Second-quantized representation for a model system with composite particles. J. Math. Phys. 18, 791–806 (1977)
Law, C.K.: Quantum entanglement as an interpretation of bosonic character in composite two-particle systems. Phys. Rev. A 71, 034306 (2005)
Sancho, P.: Compositeness effects, Pauli’s principle and entanglement. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 39, 12525–12537 (2006)
Schrieffer, J.R.: Theory of Superconductivity. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City (1988)
Zeldovich, Ya.B.: The number of elementary baryons and the universal baryons repulsion hypothesis. Sov. Phys. JETP 10, 403 (1960)
Huzinaga, S., McWilliams, D., Cantu, A.A.: Projection operators in Hartree-Fock theory. Adv. Quantum Chem. 7, 187–220 (1973)
Pascual, J.L., Barros, N., Barandiarán, Z., Seijo, L.: Improved embedding ab initio model potentials for embedded cluster calculations. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 12454–12460 (2009)
Gutowski, M., Piela, L.: Interpretation of the Hartree-Fock interaction energy between closed-shell systems. Mol. Phys. 64, 337–355 (1988)
Rajchel, Ł., Zuchowski, P.S., Szczesńiak, M.M., Chałasiński, G.: Derivation of the supermolecular interaction energy from the monomer densities in the density functional theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 486, 160–165 (2010)
Cavalcanti, D., Malard, L.M., Matinaga, F.M., Terra Cunha, M.O., França Santos, M.: Useful entanglement from the Pauli principle. Phys. Rev. B 76, 113304 (2007)
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 867–942 (2009)
Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Schrödinger, E.: Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935)
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)
Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Greenberger, D.M., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Zeilinger, A.: Bell’s theorem without inequalities. Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131–1143 (1990)
Mermin, N.D.: Quantum mysteries revisited. Am. J. Phys. 58, 731–734 (1990)
Hilborn, R.C., Tino, G.M. (eds.): Spin-Statistics Connection and Commutation Relations. AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 545. AIP, Melville (2000)
Greenberg, O.W., Mohapatra, R.N.: Phemenology of small violations of Fermi and Bose statistics. Phys. Rev. D 39, 2032–2038 (1989)
Okun, L.B.: Tests of electric charge conservation and the Pauli principle. Sov. Phys. Usp. 32, 543–547 (1989)
Ignatiev, A.Y.: X rays test of the Pauli exclusion principle. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75, 2090–2096 (2006)
VIP Collaboration: http://www.lnf.infn.it/esperimenti/ (2005)
Curceanu, C. (Petrascu), et al.: Experimental tests of quantum mechanics—Pauli exclusion principle violation (the VIP experiment) and future perspective. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 9, 145–154 (2011)
Curceanu, C. (Petrascu), et al.: New experimental limit on the Pauli exclusion principle violation by electrons-the VIP experiment. Found. Phys. 41, 282–287 (2011)
Elliott, S.R., LaRoque, B.H., Gehman, V.M., Kidd, M.F., Chen, M.: An improved limit on Pauli-exclusion-principle forbidden atomic transitions. Found. Phys. 42, 1015–1030 (2012)
Ignatiev, A.Yu., Kuzmin, V.A.: Is the weak violation of the Pauli exclusion principle possible? Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 461, 786 (1987)
Greenberg, O.W., Mohapatra, R.N.: Local quantum field theory of possible violation of the Pauli principle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2507–2510 (1987)
Pauli, W.: Nobel Lecture. In: Nobel Lectures, Physics, pp. 1942–1962. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1964)
Pauli, W.: The connection between spin and statistics. Phys. Rev. 58, 716–722 (1940)
Green, H.S.: A generalized method of field quantization. Phys. Rev. 90, 270–273 (1953)
Volkov, D.V.: On the quantization of half-integer spin fields. Sov. Phys. JETP 9, 1107–1111 (1959)
Ohnuki, Y., Kamefuchi, S.: Quantum Field Theory and Parastatistics. Springer, Berlin (1982)
Duck, I., Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Pauli and the Spin-Statistics Theorem. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)
Wightman, A.S.: Pauli and the spin-statistics theorem. Am. J. Phys. 67, 742 (1999)
Berry, M., Robbins, J.: Quantum indistinguishability: spin-statistics without relativity or field theory? In: Hilborn, R.C., Tino, G.M. (eds.) Spin-Statistics Connection and Commutation Relations. AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 545, pp. 3–15. AIP, Melville (2000)
Chernikov, N.A.: The Fock representation of the Duffin-Kemmer algebra. Acta Phys. Pol. 21, 52–60 (1962)
Greenberg, O.W.: Spin and unitary-spin independence in a paraquark model of baryons and mesons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 598–602 (1964)
Govorkov, A.B.: Parastatistics and internal symmetry. Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 14, 520–537 (1983)
Kaplan, I.G.: Statistics of molecular excitons and magnons for large concentration. Theor. Math. Phys. 27, 254–261 (1976)
Avdyugin, A.N., Zavorotnev, Yu.D., Ovander, L.N.: Polaritons in highly excited crystals. Sov. Phys., Solid State 25, 1437–1438 (1983)
Pushkarov, D.I.: On the defecton statistics in quantum crystals. Phys. Status Solidi B, Basic Solid State Phys. 133, 525–531 (1986)
Nguen, A., Hoang, N.C.: An approach to the many-exciton system. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2, 4127–4136 (1990)
Kaplan, I.G., Navarro, O.: Charge transfer and the statistics of holons in periodical lattice. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 11, 6187–6195 (1999)
Kaplan, I.G., Navarro, O.: Statistic and properties of coupled hole pairs in superconducting ceramics. Physica C, Supercond. 341(348), 217–220 (2000)
Kaplan, I.G.: Pauli spin-statistics theorem and statistics of quasiparticles in a periodical lattice. In: Hilborn, R.C., Tino, G.M. (eds.) Spin-Statistics Connection and Commutation Relations. AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 545, pp. 72–78. AIP, Melville (2000)
Kaplan, I.G.: The Pauli exclusion principle, spin-statistics connection, and permutation symmetry of many-particles wave functions. In: Brandas, E.J., Kryachko, E.S. (eds.) Fundamental World of Quantum Chemistry, vol. 1, pp. 183–220. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)
Kaplan, I.G.: Symmetry postulate and its foundation in quantum mechanics. In: Man’ko, V.I. (ed.) Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, vol. 1, pp. 175–183. Nauka, Moscow (1980)
Kaplan, I.G.: Exclusion principle and indistinguishability of identical particles in quantum mechanics. J. Mol. Struct. 272, 187–196 (1992)
Kaplan, I.G.: Is the Pauli exclusive principle an independent quantum mechanical postulate? Int. J. Quant. Chem. 89, 268–276 (2002)
Pauli, W.: Remarks on the history of the exclusion principle. Science 103, 213–215 (1946)
Dirac, P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1958)
Schiff, L.I.: Quantum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1955)
Messiah, A.M.: Quantum Mechanics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1962)
Messiah, A.M., Greenberg, O.W.: Symmetrization postulate and its experimental foundation. Phys. Rev. 136, B248–B267 (1964)
Girardeau, M.D.: Permutation symmetry of many-particle wave function. Phys. Rev. 139, B500–B508 (1965)
Corson, E.M.: Perturbation Methods in Quantum Mechanics of Electron Systems. University Press, Glasgow (1951)
Landau, L.D., Lifschitz, E.M.: Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1965)
Blokhintzev, D.I.: Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1964)
Kaplan, I.G.: The exclusion principle and indistinguishability of identical particles in quantum mechanics. Sov. Phys. Usp. 18, 988–994 (1976)
Canright, G.S., Girvin, S.M.: Fractional statistics: quantum possibilities in two dimensions. Science 247, 1197–1205 (1990)
Girardeau, M.D.: Proof of the symmetrization postulate. J. Math. Phys. 10, 1302–1304 (1969)
von Neumann, J.V.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1955). English translation by R.T. Beyer
Fock, V.A.: Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. Manuscript, B31, F-750, Library of Physical Faculty, St Petersburg State University (1937)
Kaplan, I.G.: Problems in DFT with the total spin and degenerate states. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 107, 2595–2603 (2007)
Schweber, S.S.: An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Row Peterson, New York (1961)
Kaplan, I.G., Rodimova, O.B.: Matrix elements of general configuration of nonorthogonal orbital in state with definite spin. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 7, 1203–1220 (1973)
March, N.H., Young, W.H., Sampanthar, S.: The Many-Body Problem in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1967)
Hamermesh, M.: Group Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1962)
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Serge Zagoulaev and Steve Elliot for helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Short Necessary Knowledge on the Permutation Group
Appendix: Short Necessary Knowledge on the Permutation Group
The permutation symmetry is classified according to the irreducible representations of the permutation group π N .Footnote 2 The latter are labeled by the Young diagrams
where λ i is represented by a row of λ i cells. The presence of several rows of equal length λ i is convenient to indicate by a power of λ i . For example,
It is obvious that one can form from two cells only two Young diagrams:
For the permutation group of three elements, π 3, one can form from three cells three Young diagrams:
The group π 4 has five Young diagrams:
Each Young diagram [λ] uniquely corresponds to a specific irreducible representation Γ [λ] of the group π N . The assignment of a Young diagram determines the permutation symmetry of the basis functions for an irreducible representation, i.e. determines the behavior of the basis functions under permutations of their arguments. A diagram with only one row corresponds to a function symmetrical in all its arguments. A Young diagram with one column corresponds to a completely antisymmetrical function. All other types of diagrams correspond to intermediate types of symmetry. There are certain rules that enable one to find the matrices of irreducible representations of the permutations group from the form of the corresponding Young diagram. Such rules are especially simple in the case of the so-called standard orthogonal representation (this is the Young-Yamanouchi representation; see Ref. [11]).
The basis functions for an irreducible representation Γ [λ] can be constructed by means of the so-called normalized Young operators [11],Footnote 3
where the summation over P runs over all the N! permutations in the group π N , \(\varGamma_{rt}^{ [ \lambda ]} ( P )\) are the matrix elements and f λ is the dimension of the irreducible representation Γ [λ]. The application of operator (33) to a nonsymmetrized product of orthonormal one-particle functions φ a
produces a normalized function
transforming in accordance with the representation Γ [λ]. Let us prove this statement applying an arbitrary permutation Q of the group π N to the function (35):
In this equation we have denoted the permutation QP by R and made use of the invariance properties of a sum over all group elements. Further, we write the matrix element of the product of permutations as products of matrix elements and make use of the property of orthogonal matrices:
Substituting (37) in (36), we obtain finally
The function \(\varPhi_{rt}^{ [ \lambda ]}\) transforms as the r-th column of the irreducible representation Γ [λ], and the set of f λ functions \(\varPhi_{rt}^{ [ \lambda ]}\) with fixed second index t forms a basis for the irreducible representation Γ [λ]. One can form altogether f λ independent bases corresponding to the number of different values of t. This should be expected, since N! functions PΦ 0 form a basis for the regular representation of π N , and in the decomposition of the regular representation, each irreducible representation occurs as many times as its dimension. The first index, r, characterizes the symmetry of the function \(\varPhi_{rt}^{ [ \lambda ]}\) under permutation of the arguments. It can be shown [11] that the second index, t, enumerating the different bases of Γ [λ], characterizes the symmetry of \(\varPhi_{rt}^{ [ \lambda ]}\) under permutations of the one-particle functions φ a .
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, I.G. The Pauli Exclusion Principle. Can It Be Proved?. Found Phys 43, 1233–1251 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-013-9742-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-013-9742-4