Abstract
While numerous studies have investigated teachers’ professional learning through their interaction with resources, the question of how teachers’ knowledge evolves at different stages of the instructional process remains underexplored. To address this gap, this article builds on the documentational approach to didactics (DAD) and the theory of instrumental orchestration to investigate teachers’ professional learning in terms of document development through their interaction with resources in and out of class. To this end, the paper proposes a theoretical and methodological model to analyze the evolution of a document, focusing on the joint evolution of utilization schemes and professional situations. This model provides analytical tools to track the development of teachers’ professional knowledge. The theoretical and methodological model was applied to a case study involving a Tunisian primary school teacher who used the technological resource GeoGebra for the first time to introduce the properties of parallelograms to 6th grade students (aged 11–12). Findings suggest the relevance and operationality of the proposed model, through a short-term analysis of documentational genesis, to track the evolution of the teacher’s professional knowledge related to the use of GeoGebra in class. This model can be considered as a theoretical and methodological contribution, deepening the understanding of teachers’ professional learning when using technological resources and providing insights into the dynamic nature of teachers’ professional knowledge development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data are provided in full in the results section of this paper.
Notes
The planned and enacted curriculum according to Remillard framework are considered as documents in sense of the Documentational approach of didactics as they encompass resources in use (Remillard, 2019, p.177).
When not specified, the expression “professional knowledge” is used in a broad way related to the professional dimension of the teacher’s work and conceived as a whole without distinguishing between its different types.
In this model, Coulet (2019) defined competence as the pair (situation, scheme).
The teacher’s documentation work is based on different types of resources and the list of resources proposed in the analyses and in the document status tables is far from being exhaustive.
The experiment lasted for three months of follow-up, during which two classroom implementation lessons were recorded, spaced at five-week intervals.
The methodological contract is defined as “the formalization of a set of mutual expectations between the researcher and the teacher (or group of teachers), […] The methodological contract must make it possible to formalize part of the relationship between researcher and teachers, where the researcher is to be, as much as possible, an outsider.” (Loisy et al., 2019, p. 263).
Laborde (2005) distinguishes two paradigms of use of variation in DGE: robust constructions (where the drag mode preserves the properties of the construction. Thus, variation is used as a verification means). Soft constructions (where the variation is part of the construction and a property becomes visible only when another is satisfied. The soft constructions offer a transition from an empirical approach to theoretical approach).
The interviews were in Arabic language and translations into English provided here are personal translations.
Personal translation from the teacher’s declaration during the interview.
References
Abboud, M., & Rogalski, J. (2021). Open dynamic situations of classroom use of digital technologies: Investigating teachers’ interventions. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(2), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00151-9
Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009903206236
Besnier, S. (2019). Travail documentaire des professeurs et ressources technologiques : Le cas de l’enseignement du nombre à l’école maternelle. Education and Didactique, 13(2), 119–153. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.4206
Choppin, A. (2005). L’édition scolaire française et ses contraintes : Une perspective historique. In E. Bruillard (Ed.), Manuels scolaires, regards croisés (pp. 39–53). CRDP de Basse-Normandie.
Choppin, J. (2019). Afterword: Reflections on the documentational approach to didactics. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds.), The ‘resource’ approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 491–502). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_14
Coulet, J. (2019). The organization activity: A foresight approach of theoretical knowledge evolution in management science. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.009
Coutat, S. (2006). Intégration de la géométrie dynamique dans l'enseignement de la géométrie pour favoriser la liaison école primaire collège : Une ingénierie didactique au collège sur la notion de propriété. Doctoral dissertation, Université Joseph-Fourier-Grenoble I. Retrieved March 19, 2024, from https://theses.hal.science/tel-00110052v1/document
Drijvers, P., Tacoma, S., Besamusca, A., Doorman, M., & Boon, P. (2013). Digital resources inviting changes in mid-adopting teachers’ practices and orchestrations. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45(7), 987–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0535-1
Drijvers, P. (2011). Teachers transforming resources into orchestrations. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin & L. Trouche (Eds), From text to 'lived' resources. Mathematics teacher education (pp 265–281). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_14
Goos, M., Soury-Lavergne, S., Assude, T., Brown, J., Kong, C. M., Glover, D., Grugeon, B., Laborde, C., Lavicza, Z., Miller, D., & Sinclair, M. (2009). Teachers and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In New ICMI studies series (pp. 311–328). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_14
Gueudet, G. (2017). University teachers’ resources systems and documents. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 198–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0034-1
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9159-8
Gueudet, G., Buteau, C., Müller, E., Mgombelo, J., Sacristán, A. I., & Rodríguez, M. S. (2022). Development and evolution of instrumented schemes: A case study of learning programming for mathematical investigations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10133-1
Gueudet, G. (2019). Studying teachers’ documentation work: Emergence of a theoretical approach. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds), The 'resource' approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp 17–42). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_2
Khalloufi-Mouha, F. (2022). Une stratégie de réseautage pour une analyse sémiotique et discursive des pratiques langagières de l’enseignant lors d’une discussion collective dans une séance intégrant un environnement informatique. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00201-w
Khalloufi-Mouha, F., & Brini, M. (2022). Rôles des interactions enseignant-élèves dans l’intégration d’un logiciel de géométrie dynamique: Le cas d’un enseignant du primaire en Tunisie. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(4), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00257-8
Khalloufi-Mouha, F., & Smida, H. (2012). Constructing mathematical meaning of a trigonometric function through the use of an artefact. African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2012.10740740
Laborde, C. (2005). Robust and soft constructions: Two sides of the use of dynamic geometry environments. In S.-C. Chu, H.-C. Lew, & W.-C. Yang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (pp. 22–35). Retrieved March 19, 2024, from https://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP/2005/2005P279/fullpaper.pdf
Loisy, C., Sabra, H., Courtney, S. A., Rocha, K. P., Gracin, K. G., Aldon, G., Front, M., Gardes, M., Taranto, E., Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2019). Analyzing teachers’ work with resources: Methodological issues. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds.), The 'resource' approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 257–321). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_10
Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teachers’ work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45(7), 929–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0534-2
Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies ; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Armand Colin.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4
République tunisienne. (2002). Journal officiel de la république tunisienne. Loi d’orientation n°2002–80 du 23 juillet 2002, relative à l’enseignement scolaire. N°62, pp.1735–1740. Retrieved March 19, 2024, from https://www.pist.tn/jort/2002/2002F/Jo0622002.pdf
République tunisienne. (2002). Programmes de mathématiques. Enseignement de base. Ministère de l’Éducation et de la Formation. http://www.edunet.tn/ressources/pedagogie/programmes/sciences/mathematique/math_degre3_3.pdf
République tunisienne. (2020). Mathématiques. Sixième année de l’enseignement de base. Ministère de l’Éducation. https://www.cnp.com.tn/arabic/PDF/102609P00.pdf
Rezat, S., Hénaff, C. L., Višňovská, J., Kim, O., Leroyer, L., Sabra, H., Hage, S. E., & Wang, C. (2019). Documentation work, design capacity, and teachers’ expertise in designing instruction. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds.), The ‘resource’ approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 323–388). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_11
Sabra, H. (2016). L’étude des rapports entre documentations individuelle et collective : incidents, connaissances et ressources mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 36(1), 49- 95. https://revue-rdm.com/2016/l-etude-des-rapports-entre/
Sinclair, N., Bartolini, M. G., De Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A., & Owens, K. (2016). Recent research on geometry education: An ICME-13 survey team report. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 48(5), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0796-6
Tabach, M. (2011). A mathematics teacher’s practice in a technological environment: A case study analysis using two complementary theories. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 16(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-011-9186-x
Trgalova, J., Soury-Lavergne, S., & Jahn, A.-P. (2011). Quality assessment process for dynamic geometry resources in Intergeo project : Rationale and experiments. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 43(3), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0335-4
Trgalová, J., & Rousson, L. (2017). Model of appropriation of a curricular resource: A case of a digital game for the teaching of enumeration skills in kindergarten. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49(5), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0877-1
Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-004-3468-5
Trouche, L., Rocha, K., Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2020). Transition to digital resources as a critical process in teachers’ trajectories: The case of Anna’s documentation work. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1243–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01164-8
Trouche, L., Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2018). The documentational approach to didactics. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Springer, (pp. 1–11.) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_100011-1
Trouche, L. (2019). Evidencing missing resources of the documentational approach to didactics. Toward ten programs of research/development for enriching this approach. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds), The 'Resource' approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 447–489). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_13
Vergnaud, G. (2009). The theory of conceptual fields. Human Development, 52(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000202727
Vergnaud, G. (1998). Towards a cognitive theory of practice. In A.Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity. New ICMI Studies Series, (pp. 227–240) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5194-8_15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khalloufi-Mouha, F. Evolution of teachers’ professional learning when using a technological resource: a case study of a Tunisian primary school teacher. Educ Stud Math (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10320-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10320-w