Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of teachers’ professional learning when using a technological resource: a case study of a Tunisian primary school teacher

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While numerous studies have investigated teachers’ professional learning through their interaction with resources, the question of how teachers’ knowledge evolves at different stages of the instructional process remains underexplored. To address this gap, this article builds on the documentational approach to didactics (DAD) and the theory of instrumental orchestration to investigate teachers’ professional learning in terms of document development through their interaction with resources in and out of class. To this end, the paper proposes a theoretical and methodological model to analyze the evolution of a document, focusing on the joint evolution of utilization schemes and professional situations. This model provides analytical tools to track the development of teachers’ professional knowledge. The theoretical and methodological model was applied to a case study involving a Tunisian primary school teacher who used the technological resource GeoGebra for the first time to introduce the properties of parallelograms to 6th grade students (aged 11–12). Findings suggest the relevance and operationality of the proposed model, through a short-term analysis of documentational genesis, to track the evolution of the teacher’s professional knowledge related to the use of GeoGebra in class. This model can be considered as a theoretical and methodological contribution, deepening the understanding of teachers’ professional learning when using technological resources and providing insights into the dynamic nature of teachers’ professional knowledge development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are provided in full in the results section of this paper.

Notes

  1. The planned and enacted curriculum according to Remillard framework are considered as documents in sense of the Documentational approach of didactics as they encompass resources in use (Remillard, 2019, p.177).

  2. When not specified, the expression “professional knowledge” is used in a broad way related to the professional dimension of the teacher’s work and conceived as a whole without distinguishing between its different types.

  3. In this model, Coulet (2019) defined competence as the pair (situation, scheme).

  4. The teacher’s documentation work is based on different types of resources and the list of resources proposed in the analyses and in the document status tables is far from being exhaustive.

  5. The experiment lasted for three months of follow-up, during which two classroom implementation lessons were recorded, spaced at five-week intervals.

  6. The methodological contract is defined as “the formalization of a set of mutual expectations between the researcher and the teacher (or group of teachers), […] The methodological contract must make it possible to formalize part of the relationship between researcher and teachers, where the researcher is to be, as much as possible, an outsider.” (Loisy et al., 2019, p. 263).

  7. Laborde (2005) distinguishes two paradigms of use of variation in DGE: robust constructions (where the drag mode preserves the properties of the construction. Thus, variation is used as a verification means). Soft constructions (where the variation is part of the construction and a property becomes visible only when another is satisfied. The soft constructions offer a transition from an empirical approach to theoretical approach).

  8. The interviews were in Arabic language and translations into English provided here are personal translations.

  9. Personal translation from the teacher’s declaration during the interview.

References

  • Abboud, M., & Rogalski, J. (2021). Open dynamic situations of classroom use of digital technologies: Investigating teachers’ interventions. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(2), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00151-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009903206236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besnier, S. (2019). Travail documentaire des professeurs et ressources technologiques : Le cas de l’enseignement du nombre à l’école maternelle. Education and Didactique, 13(2), 119–153. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.4206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choppin, A. (2005). L’édition scolaire française et ses contraintes : Une perspective historique. In E. Bruillard (Ed.), Manuels scolaires, regards croisés (pp. 39–53). CRDP de Basse-Normandie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choppin, J. (2019). Afterword: Reflections on the documentational approach to didactics. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds.), The ‘resource’ approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 491–502). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_14

  • Coulet, J. (2019). The organization activity: A foresight approach of theoretical knowledge evolution in management science. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutat, S. (2006). Intégration de la géométrie dynamique dans l'enseignement de la géométrie pour favoriser la liaison école primaire collège : Une ingénierie didactique au collège sur la notion de propriété. Doctoral dissertation, Université Joseph-Fourier-Grenoble I. Retrieved March 19, 2024, from https://theses.hal.science/tel-00110052v1/document

  • Drijvers, P., Tacoma, S., Besamusca, A., Doorman, M., & Boon, P. (2013). Digital resources inviting changes in mid-adopting teachers’ practices and orchestrations. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45(7), 987–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0535-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drijvers, P. (2011). Teachers transforming resources into orchestrations. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin & L. Trouche (Eds), From text to 'lived' resources. Mathematics teacher education (pp 265–281). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_14

  • Goos, M., Soury-Lavergne, S., Assude, T., Brown, J., Kong, C. M., Glover, D., Grugeon, B., Laborde, C., Lavicza, Z., Miller, D., & Sinclair, M. (2009). Teachers and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In New ICMI studies series (pp. 311–328). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_14

  • Gueudet, G. (2017). University teachers’ resources systems and documents. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 198–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0034-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9159-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., Buteau, C., Müller, E., Mgombelo, J., Sacristán, A. I., & Rodríguez, M. S. (2022). Development and evolution of instrumented schemes: A case study of learning programming for mathematical investigations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10133-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G. (2019). Studying teachers’ documentation work: Emergence of a theoretical approach. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds), The 'resource' approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp 17–42). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_2

  • Khalloufi-Mouha, F. (2022). Une stratégie de réseautage pour une analyse sémiotique et discursive des pratiques langagières de l’enseignant lors d’une discussion collective dans une séance intégrant un environnement informatique. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00201-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalloufi-Mouha, F., & Brini, M. (2022). Rôles des interactions enseignant-élèves dans l’intégration d’un logiciel de géométrie dynamique: Le cas d’un enseignant du primaire en Tunisie. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(4), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00257-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalloufi-Mouha, F., & Smida, H. (2012). Constructing mathematical meaning of a trigonometric function through the use of an artefact. African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2012.10740740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. (2005). Robust and soft constructions: Two sides of the use of dynamic geometry environments. In S.-C. Chu, H.-C. Lew, & W.-C. Yang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (pp. 22–35). Retrieved March 19, 2024, from https://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP/2005/2005P279/fullpaper.pdf

  • Loisy, C., Sabra, H., Courtney, S. A., Rocha, K. P., Gracin, K. G., Aldon, G., Front, M., Gardes, M., Taranto, E., Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2019). Analyzing teachers’ work with resources: Methodological issues. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds.), The 'resource' approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 257–321). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_10

  • Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teachers’ work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45(7), 929–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0534-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies ; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Armand Colin.

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • République tunisienne. (2002). Journal officiel de la république tunisienne. Loi d’orientation n°2002–80 du 23 juillet 2002, relative à l’enseignement scolaire. N°62, pp.1735–1740. Retrieved March 19, 2024, from https://www.pist.tn/jort/2002/2002F/Jo0622002.pdf

  • République tunisienne. (2002). Programmes de mathématiques. Enseignement de base. Ministère de l’Éducation et de la Formation. http://www.edunet.tn/ressources/pedagogie/programmes/sciences/mathematique/math_degre3_3.pdf

  • République tunisienne. (2020). Mathématiques. Sixième année de l’enseignement de base. Ministère de l’Éducation. https://www.cnp.com.tn/arabic/PDF/102609P00.pdf

  • Rezat, S., Hénaff, C. L., Višňovská, J., Kim, O., Leroyer, L., Sabra, H., Hage, S. E., & Wang, C. (2019). Documentation work, design capacity, and teachers’ expertise in designing instruction. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds.), The ‘resource’ approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 323–388). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_11

  • Sabra, H. (2016). L’étude des rapports entre documentations individuelle et collective : incidents, connaissances et ressources mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 36(1), 49- 95. https://revue-rdm.com/2016/l-etude-des-rapports-entre/

  • Sinclair, N., Bartolini, M. G., De Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A., & Owens, K. (2016). Recent research on geometry education: An ICME-13 survey team report. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 48(5), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0796-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabach, M. (2011). A mathematics teacher’s practice in a technological environment: A case study analysis using two complementary theories. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 16(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-011-9186-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trgalova, J., Soury-Lavergne, S., & Jahn, A.-P. (2011). Quality assessment process for dynamic geometry resources in Intergeo project : Rationale and experiments. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 43(3), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0335-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trgalová, J., & Rousson, L. (2017). Model of appropriation of a curricular resource: A case of a digital game for the teaching of enumeration skills in kindergarten. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49(5), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0877-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-004-3468-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouche, L., Rocha, K., Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2020). Transition to digital resources as a critical process in teachers’ trajectories: The case of Anna’s documentation work. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1243–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01164-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouche, L., Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2018). The documentational approach to didactics. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Springer, (pp. 1–11.) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_100011-1

  • Trouche, L. (2019). Evidencing missing resources of the documentational approach to didactics. Toward ten programs of research/development for enriching this approach. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet & B. Pepin (Eds), The 'Resource' approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 447–489). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_13

  • Vergnaud, G. (2009). The theory of conceptual fields. Human Development, 52(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000202727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1998). Towards a cognitive theory of practice. In A.Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity. New ICMI Studies Series, (pp. 227–240) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5194-8_15

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faten Khalloufi-Mouha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalloufi-Mouha, F. Evolution of teachers’ professional learning when using a technological resource: a case study of a Tunisian primary school teacher. Educ Stud Math (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10320-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10320-w

Keywords

Navigation