Approach to mathematical problem solving and students’ belief systems: two case studies
The goal of the study reported here is to gain a better understanding of the role of belief systems in the approach phase to mathematical problem solving. Two students of high academic performance were selected based on a previous exploratory study of 61 students 12–13 years old. In this study we identified different types of approaches to problems that determine the behavior of students in the problem-solving process. The research found two aspects that explain the students’ approaches to problem solving: (1) the presence of a dualistic belief system originating in the student’s school experience; and (2) motivation linked to beliefs regarding the difficulty of the task. Our results indicate that there is a complex relationship between students’ belief systems and approaches to problem solving, if we consider a wide variety of beliefs about the nature of mathematics and problem solving and motivational beliefs, but that it is not possible to establish relationships of causality between specific beliefs and problem-solving activity (or vice versa).
KeywordsApproach to problem solving Patterns of action Problem solving Students’ belief systems
The authors would like to express their gratitude for the help provided by Salvador Llinares (Universidad de Alicante) in preparing this manuscript, by Jody Doran (Washington University in St. Louis) in its translation and for the suggestions made by anonymous reviewers.
- Frank, M. L. (1988). Problem solving and mathematical beliefs. The Arithmetic Teacher, 35(5), 32–35.Google Scholar
- Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: KluwerGoogle Scholar
- Garofalo, J. (1989). Beliefs and their influence on mathematical performance. Mathematics Teacher, 82(7), 502–505.Google Scholar
- Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching (Ch. 3). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Greer, B. (1993). The mathematical modelling perspective on wor(l)d problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12(3), 239–250.Google Scholar
- Hoyles, C. (1992). Mathematics teaching and mathematics teachers: A meta-case study. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(3), 32–44.Google Scholar
- Kloosterman, P. (2002). Beliefs about mathematics and matematics learning in the secondary school: Measurement and implications for motivation. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 247–269). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.Google Scholar
- Leder, G. C. (2008). Beliefs: What lies behind the mirror. In B. Sriraman (Ed.), Beliefs and mathematics (pp. 39–54). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Leder, G. C., Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (eds). (2002). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education?. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Lester, F. K. (2002). Implications of research on students’ beliefs for classroom practice. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 345–353). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Llinares, S. (2002). Participation and reification in learning to teach: The role of knowledge and beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 195–209). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. London: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- McLeod, D. B., & Adams, V. M. (eds). (1989). Affect and mathematical problem solving. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (1999). Introduction to the abstract book for the Oberwolfach meeting on belief research. Abstract of the “Mathematical beliefs and their impact on teaching and learning of mathematics” (pp. 3–10). Conference at Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach (MF0). Retrieved October 15, 2008, from: http://www.uni-duisburg.de/FB11/PROJECTS/MFO_abstracts.pdf.
- Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jassey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189–215). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense-making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–389). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modeling of school word problems. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Vila, A. (2001). Resolució de problemes de matemàtiques: identificació, origen i formació dels sistemes de creences en l’alumnat. Alguns efectes sobre l’abordatge dels problemes, Doctoral Dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from: http://www.tdx.cesca.es/TDX-0925101-170122.
- Vila, A., & Callejo, M. L. (2004). Matemáticas para aprender a pensar. El papel de las creencias en la resolución de problemas. Madrid: Narcea.Google Scholar