Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Is This a Boy or a Girl?”: Rethinking Sex-Role Representation in Caldecott Medal-Winning Picturebooks, 1938–2011

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Children's Literature in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of previous studies have addressed gender role-stereotyping in Caldecott Award-winning picturebooks. Building upon the extensive scholarship examining representations of females in Caldecott books, this current study offers a critical investigation of how gender is represented in Caldecott Medal-winning literature from 1938 to 2011 by exploring the ways in which “femininity” and “masculinity,” biological sex, and gender are constructed in these texts. The investigators briefly address author and illustrator gender and the representations of males and females as characters or images in pictures and text before departing from previous scholarship to offer a rereading of books that feature “ungendered” leading characters, those that are not identified in the text as being either “male” or “female” and are therefore open to the interpretation of individual readers. By resisting cultural cues and normative constructions of gender and biological sex, these ungendered depictions extend the range of possible ways in which readers may see themselves or those in their lives represented in Caldecott Medal-winning picturebooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We follow the lead of Wolfenbarger and Sipe (2007) and scholars such as Barbara Kiefer, Maria Nikolajeva, and David Lewis by using the compound word “picturebook” as opposed to “picture book” because it “recognizes the union of text and art that results in something beyond what each form separately contributes” (p. 273).

  2. For an informative problematizing of prizing children’s fiction, see Kidd (2007) in Children’s Literature and (2009) in this journal.

  3. In fact, some researchers have argued that “the Caldecott winners are clearly less stereotyped than the average book, and do not include the most blatant examples of sexism” (Weitzman et al., 1972, p. 1127).

  4. As Segel (1982) argues, in several of these studies, there is “a disturbing tendency…to assume that any illustrated figure of unspecified gender is male” (p. 31).

  5. We acknowledge that this position presumes that only text (words) can specify gender (i.e., “he” or “she”) and privileges textual language by assuming that words are more “fixed” than visual images, a notion questioned by critics and theorists like Jacques Derrida. Written text is ultimately as slippery as visual images: as one example, in queer cultures, words that may previously have been assumed to have “fixed” meanings (i.e., “girl” or “she”) are often resignified and used across categories of biological sex and gender-identity.

  6. Throughout this discussion, the gender neutral pronoun “ze” is adopted as opposed to “he” or “she.” Following this lead, “his” or “her” has been replaced with “hir.”

  7. Some readers may interpret the burglar as a character temporarily cross-dressing to disguise hir identity and still not find humor in the sequence. Space does not allow for a full reading of this sequence in light of the literary traditions of male-to-female cross-dressing, a tradition explored in more depth in Flanagan’s Into the Closet: Cross-Dressing and the Gendered Body in Children’s Literature and Film (2007). Particularly relevant here is Flanagan’s discussion of the use of male-to-female cross-dressing to invoke humor in children’s and young adult literature.

References

  • Association for Library Service for Children. (2001). The Newbery & Caldecott Medal Books, 1986–2000. Chicago: American Library Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Library Service for Children. (2009). Randolph Caldecott Medal Committee Manual. Accessed July 11, 2010 from http://www.ala.org.

  • Albers, P. (1996). Issues of Representation: Caldecott Gold Medal Winners 1984–1995. The New Advocate, 9(4), 267–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2008/1958). Distinction in Picture Books. In Andrea Schwenke Wyile and Teya Rosenberg (Eds.), Considering Children’s Literature: A Reader (pp. 84–91). Buffalo, NY: Broadview Press.

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.L. (1992). American Children’s Literature: Background and Bibliography. American Studies International, 30(1), 4–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., Guilmain, J., Saucier, P., & Tavarez, J. (2003). Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The Presence of Female Characters and Gender Stereotyping in Award-Winning Picturebooks Between the 1930s and the 1960s. Sex Roles, 49(9/10), 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., Lennon, R., & Morris, L. (1993). Of Caldecotts and Kings: Gendered Images in Recent American Children’s Books by Black and Non-Black Illustrators. Gender and Society, 7(2), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, T. (2009). From Romance to Magical Realism: The Limits and Possibilities of Gay Adolescent Literature. Children’s Literature in Education, 40(4), 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, T., & Hiller, B. (2011). Is This a Boy or a Girl? Rethinking Gender Representation in Caldecott Medal-Winning Picturebooks. In Children’s Literature Symposium. Sarasota, FL: University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee, 5 Feb 2011.

  • Davis, A.J. (1984). Sex-Differentiated Behaviors in Non-Sexist Picturebooks. Sex Roles, 11(1/2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, W., & Engel, R. (1987). An 80s Look for Sex Equality in Caldecott Winners and Honor Books. The Reading Teacher, 40(4), 394–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. (1981). Is Unequal Treatment of Females Diminishing in Children’s Picturebooks? The Reading Teacher, 34(6), 647–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterley, J. (1978). The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, V. (2007). Into the Closet: Cross-Dressing and the Gendered Body in Children’s Literature and Film. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. (1993). Men Who Weep, Boys Who Dance: The Gender Agenda Between the Lines in Children’s Literature. Language Arts, 70(2), 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M., Anderson, D., Broaddus, M., & Young, K. (2006). Gender Stereotyping and Under-Representation of Female Characters in 200 Popular Children’s Picturebooks: A Twenty-First Century Update. Sex Roles, 55(11/12), 757–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, K.B. (2007). Prizing Children’s Literature: The Case of Newbery Gold. Children’s Literature, 35, 166–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, K.B. (2009). “Not Censorship but Selection”: Censorship and/as Prizing. Children’s Literature in Education, 40(3), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingman, L. (1965). Newbery and Caldecott Medal Books, 1956–1965: With Acceptance Papers, Biographies and Related Material Chiefly from the Horn Book Magazine. Boston: Jane’s Information Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingman, L. (1976). Newbery and Caldecott Medal Books, 1966–1975: With Acceptance Papers, Biographies and Related Material Chiefly from the Horn Book Magazine. Boston: Horn Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingman, L. (1986). Newbery and Caldecott Medal Books, 1976–1985: With Acceptance Papers, Biographies and Related Material Chiefly from the Horn Book Magazine. Boston: Horn Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, R., & LaVoie, J. (1981). Sex-role Stereotyping in Preschool Children’s Picturebooks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(4), 369–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korenhaus, C., & Demarest, J. (1993). Gender Role Stereotyping in Children’s Literature: An Update. Sex Roles, 28(3/4), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2001). Reading Contemporary Picturebooks: Picturing Text. London: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilges, L.M., & Spencer, A.F. (2002). The Pictorial Representation of Gender and Physical Activity Level in Caldecott Medal Winning Children’s Literature (1940–1999): A Relational Analysis of Physical Culture. Sport, Education and Society, 7(2), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, A.P. (1971). Women in Children’s Literature. College English, 32(8), 918–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, A.P. (1978). Five Factors Contributing to the Unequal Treatment of Females in Children’s Picture Books. Top of the News, 34(2), 255–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nodelman, P. (1988). Words About Pictures: The Narrative Art of Children’s Picture Books. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlishta, K., Serbin, L., & Moller, L. (1993). The Stability of Individual Differences in Gender Typing: Implications for Understanding Gender Segregation. Sex Roles, 29(11/12), 723–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1972). When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision. College English, 34(1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, L. (1995/1938). Literature as Exploration, 5th edn. New York: Modern Language Association.

  • Segel, E. (1982). Picture-Book Sex Roles Revisited. School Library Journal, 28, 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepanier-Street, M.L., & Romatowski, J.S. (1999). The Influence of Children’s Literature on Gender Role Perceptions: A Reexamination. Early Childhood Education Journal, 26, 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, Valerie. (1990). Schoolgirl Fictions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, L., Eifler, D., Hokada, E., & Ross, C. (1972). Sex Role Socialization in Picturebooks for Preschool Children. American Journal of Sociology, 77(6), 1125–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., Vernon, J., Williams, N., & Malecha, K. (1987). Sex Role Socialization in Picturebooks: An Update. Social Science Quarterly, 68(1), 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenbarger, C.D., & Sipe, L.R. (2007). A Unique Visual and Literary Art Form: Recent Research on Picturebooks. Language Arts, 84(3), 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

Children’s Literature References

  • de Regniers, B.S. (1964). May I Bring a Friend? New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, D. (1990). Black and White. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkney, J. (2009). The Lion and the Mouse. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & Parnell, P. (2005). And Tango Makes Three. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohmann, E. (2002). My Friend Rabbit. Brookfield: Roaring Brook Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, P.C. (2010). A Sick Day for Amos McGee. New York: Neal Porter/Roaring Brook Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, S. (2008). The House in the Night. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, D. (1991). Tuesday. New York: Clarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, D. (2006). Flotsam. New York: Clarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolen, J. (1987). Owl Moon. New York: Philomel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Crisp.

Additional information

Thomas Crisp is assistant professor of literacy studies at the University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee where he teaches courses in literacy and children’s and young adult literature, media, and culture.

Brittany Hiller is a fourth grade teacher at The Out-of-Door Academy in Sarasota, Florida. She completed her M.A. in Reading Education at the University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee in 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crisp, T., Hiller, B. “Is This a Boy or a Girl?”: Rethinking Sex-Role Representation in Caldecott Medal-Winning Picturebooks, 1938–2011. Child Lit Educ 42, 196–212 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-011-9128-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-011-9128-1

Keywords

Navigation