Abstract
Diabetes is strongly linked to the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), though the mechanisms for this enhanced risk are unclear. Because vascular inflammation is a consistent feature of both diabetes and AD, the cerebral microcirculation could be a key target for the effects of diabetes in the brain. The goal of this study is to explore whether brain endothelial cells, injured by diabetes-related insults, glucose and hypoxia, can affect inflammatory and activation processes in microglia in vitro. Human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMVECs) were either treated with 5 mM glucose (control), 30 mM glucose (high glucose), exposed to hypoxia, or exposed to hypoxia plus high glucose. HBMVEC-conditioned medium was then used to treat BV-2 microglia. Alterations in microglia phenotype were assessed through measurement of nitric oxide (NO), cytokine production, microglial activation state markers, and microglial phagocytosis. HBMVECs were injured by exposure to glucose and/or hypoxia, as assessed by release of LDH, interleukin (IL)-1β, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). HBMVECs injured by glucose and hypoxia induced increases in microglial production of NO, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9. Injured HBMVECs significantly increased microglial expression of CD11c and CLEC7A, and decreased expression of the homeostatic marker P2RY12. Finally, bead uptake by BV-2 cells, an index of phagocytic ability, was elevated by conditioned media from injured HBMVECs. The demonstration that injury to brain endothelial cells by diabetic-associated insults, glucose and hypoxia, promotes microglial inflammation supports the idea that the cerebral microcirculation is a critical locus for the deleterious effects of diabetes in the AD brain.
Background
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive loss of cognitive function, leading to dementia and death (Lane et al. 2018). AD is a complex, multifactorial disorder where disparate processes likely converge to produce neuronal injury. Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) are important risk factors for the development of AD (Hofman et al. 1997; Helzner et al. 2009; Dickstein et al. 2010; Tolppanen et al. 2012; Yaffe et al. 2014). In particular, individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) have a greater than 50% increased risk for developing AD ( Ott et al. 1999; Janson et al. 2004; Gudala et al. 2013). In the periphery, diabetes and other CVRFs are potent drivers of inflammation (Lontchi-Yimagou et al. 2013). Because neuroinflammation is a consistent feature of AD, and other neurodegenerative diseases, inflammation could be a key target for the effects of diabetes in the brain.
Sustained hyperglycemia, a pathognomonic feature of diabetes, has been shown to drive endothelial cell dysfunction in the periphery via a number of signaling mechanisms, including increased expression of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inflammatory proteins (Blake and Trounce 2014; Eelen et al. 2015; Stefano et al. 2016). Microvascular endothelial cells at the blood-brain interface are the cells in the brain most directly exposed to the deleterious effects of high glucose levels. In this regard, both in vitro models utilizing high glucose conditions and in vivo experiments with diabetic animals have shown compromised blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity and increases in inflammatory proteins, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 (Bogush et al. 2017; Rom et al. 2019) .
There is a similar robust elevation in the expression of inflammatory mediators in the cerebral microcirculation in AD. AD brain endothelial cells express high levels of inflammatory adhesion molecules, such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and cationic antimicrobial protein 37 kDa (CAP37) (Frohman et al. 1991; Pereira et al. 1996; Grammas and Ovase 2001). Additionally, AD brain microvessels release significantly higher levels of nitric oxide (NO), thrombin, TNFα, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL) IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and MMPs compared to age-matched controls (Dorheim et al. 1994; Grammas and Ovase 2001; Grammas and Ovase 2002; Thirumangalakudi et al. 2006). Because the inflamed/damaged cerebral endothelium is a highly synthetic interface that produces numerous bioactive factors, it is likely that endothelial-derived products will have critical effects on neighboring cells of the neurovascular unit (NVU) (McConnell et al. 2017). The functional interaction of NVU cells through bidirectional cell-cell signaling is critical for maintaining cerebral blood flow and regulating physiologic processes in the CNS (Muoio et al. 2014). Microglia-endothelial cell cross-talk can influence BBB function and permeability (Presta et al. 2018). For example, microglia activated by treatment with LPS can induce alterations in brain endothelial cell morphology and function (Dudvarski Stankovic et al. 2016), but less is known about endothelial cell effects on microglia.
Microglia, the brain’s resident immune cells, are key drivers of the neuroinflammatory response in AD and other neurodegenerative disorders (Akiyama et al. 2000; Calsolaro and Edison 2016). Once described as existing in a quiescent or resting state, microglia are now understood to be dynamic cells that are constantly surveying their microenvironment for injury-inducing mediators (Hanisch and Kettenmann 2007). Microglia are believed to assume a diversity of phenotypes in response to noxious extracellular stimuli (Chitnis and Weiner 2017; Hickman et al. 2018). Multiple groups have identified a disease associated microglia (DAM) or microglial neurodegenerative phenotype (MGnD), which is present in AD (Keren-Shaul et al. 2017; Krasemann et al. 2017). These DAM show decreased expression of homeostatic microglia genes, including p2ry12/p2ry13 and tmem119, and increased expression of pro-inflammatory and AD-associated genes, including apoe, clec7a, and cd11c. Additionally, proliferation and activation of microglia in the brain, concentrated around amyloid plaques, is a prominent feature of AD (Matsuoka et al. 2001; Fakhoury 2018), and a number of recently identified AD-risk genes are related to regulation of microglia and the innate immune system, including triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) (Jones et al. 2010; Guerreiro et al. 2013; Jonsson et al. 2013; Lambert et al. 2013). These findings suggest that shifts in microglia function and phenotype are a key part of the pathological development of AD.
The goal of this study is to explore whether injured brain endothelial cells can affect inflammatory and activation processes in microglia. In our in vitro system, cultured brain endothelial cells are injured by exposure to stimuli that are important in the development of diabetic pathology, namely high glucose and hypoxia. The ability of conditioned media from these injured endothelial cells to alter microglial inflammatory proteins, activation markers, and phagocytic activity is assessed in order to test the hypothesis that brain endothelial cell injury will promote pro-inflammatory activation of microglia.
Methods
Cell Culture and Other Reagents
Human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMVECs- ACBRI 376) and complete medium with recombinant growth factors (4Z0-500) were purchased from Cell Systems (Kirkland, WA, USA). Murine immortalized microglia (BV-2) were kindly provided by Dr. Navindra Seeram (University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA). Low-glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), cell culture grade D-glucose (glucose), antibiotic/antimycotic (Ab/Am), Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), and Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Culture and Treatment of HBMVECs and BV-2
HBMVECs were grown to confluence in culture in complete medium in accordance with protocols described by Cell Systems and maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in complete medium. Media was switched to low glucose (5mM) DMEM with 1% BSA for treatments. HBMVECs were incubated with low glucose (5mM) (control) or high glucose (30mM) in treatment media for 6 h. Cells were maintained in normoxia for the full 6 h, or were exposed to hypoxic (1% O2) conditions for the final 1 h of treatment. Following treatment, conditioned media were collected and centrifuged briefly at 1000×g in sterile conditions to pellet debris, and used for subsequent treatment of BV-2.
BV2 were maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in low glucose (5mM) DMEM with 10% FBS, 1% Ab/Am, and 250 nM L-glutamine added. HBMVEC-conditioned media was used to treat BV-2 for 24 h. Conditioned media were collected following endothelial cell treatment with either 5 mM glucose (6 h) (EC-C), 30 mM glucose (6 h) (EC-G), exposure to hypoxia (1 h) (EC-H), or exposure to hypoxia plus high glucose (6 h) (EC-G+H).
Cytotoxicity Assay
Cellular damage of HBMVECs was assessed by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release in the conditioned medium. Following treatment, supernatant was transferred to a clear 96-well plate and total LDH was assessed using the cytotoxicity detection kit (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA). Absorbance values were read at 490nm following incubation with supplied chromogenic dye and catalyst using a Synergy HTX multi-mode reader (Biotek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).
Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)
The production of ROS by HBMVECs was determined by a fluorescent probe, 2’,7’-Dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCF-DA), using a previously described method with modification (Ma et al. 2017). HBMVECs were seeded in a black-walled, clear-bottom 96-well plate at a density of 100,000 cells per mL and allowed to grow for 36 h. Cells were then treated as previously described with high glucose with or without hypoxia for 6 h. Following the 6 h treatment, DCF-DA (10µM) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C in the dark for 25 min (min). Cells were washed 3 times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The fluorescence signal of each well was measured at 495 nm (excitation) and 529nm (emission) using a SpectraMax M2 plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Griess Assay
The production of NO was determined using the Griess reagent system. BV-2 were grown in clear 24-well plates at 100,000 cells/mL. Following treatment with HBMVEC-conditioned media for 24 h, culture media was transferred to a clear 96-well plate and total NO was assessed using the Griess reagent kit (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA). Absorbance values were read at 535nm using a Synergy HTX multi-mode reader (Biotek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).
Western Blot
Following treatments, BV-2 cells were rinsed in ice-cold PBS and lysed in 10mM Tris-HCl, 150mM NaCl buffer containing protease inhibitors. Lysates were mixed with 40% 4× Sample Buffer (4× Laemmli Sample Buffer (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) with 10% 2-mercaptoethonal) and heated to 100 °C for 10 min. Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 4–20% Novex gradient gels (Invitrogen, CA) transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (iBlot, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Membranes were blocked in 5% BSA in Tris buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.05% Tween-20. Primary antibodies for this study include iNOS (Abcam, MA; Ab15323, 1:250), CLEC7A (Novus Biologicals, CO; NBO1-45514, 1:500), P2RY12 (Novus Biologicals, CO; NBP1-69246, 1:500), CD11c (Novus Biologicals, CO; MAB6950, 1:250), and β-actin (Santa Cruz, CA; AC-15, 1:10,000). Bound antibody was detected using InfraRed detectable secondary antibodies (LI-COR, NE; 1:10,000), using LI-COR Odyssey infrared scanner for imaging (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Blots were analyzed using NIH ImageJ software and normalized against the housekeeper protein.
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
IL-1β was measured from HBMVEC-conditioned media, and TNFα and IL-6 were measured from BV-2 supernatant, using Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA; Human IL-1β cat. #437004, Mouse TNFα cat. #430904, Mouse IL-6 cat. #431304). The protocol provided by the manufacturer was followed, without modifications. At the conclusion of the assay, absorbance was detected at 570 nm and 450 nm using Synergy HTX multi-mode reader (Biotek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).
Gelatin Zymography
Gelatin zymography was performed as previously described (Thirumangalakudi et al. 2007) to assess the activity of MMP-9 in BV-2 supernatant following treatments. Briefly, samples were run on 10% Gelatin Zymogram Plus Protein Gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Following electrophoresis, gels were incubated at room temperature (RT) with zymogram renaturing buffer (Novex, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 30 min, and then incubated with zymogram developing buffer (Novex, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 30 min. Gels were further incubated with fresh developing buffer overnight at 37 °C. Gels were stained with Coomassie Blue R250 for 1 h, and de-stained in deionized water for 1 day. Images scanned on Epson Scanner (Epson, Long Beach, CA, USA) and analyzed using ImageJ.
Phagocytosis Assay
Analysis of phagocytic activity of BV-2 was done by measuring uptake of fluorescently labeled beads. Protocol for the phagocytosis assay was derived from previously published works (Lucin et al. 2013; Lian et al. 2016; Cai et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017) with modifications. BV-2 cells were plated in 8-well chamber slides at a density of 10,000 cells per well in DMEM with 10% FBS and grown for 48 h. Cells were treated as before with HBMVEC-conditioned media for 24 h.
Preopsonized latex beads of 1 um diameter (Sigma, cat. #L2778-1ML) were prepared in PBS with 50% FBS at 10% (v/v) for 1 h at 37 °C. Beads were then further diluted 1:100 in DMEM to make a 0.01% (v/v) beads and 0.05% (v/v) FBS solution.
At the conclusion of 24 h treatment, BV-2 media was removed and 500 uL of bead solution was added to each well for 1 h at 37 °C. Beads were then removed and cells were rinsed three times with cold PBS. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS (200 uL per well) for 4 min at RT. PFA was removed, cells were then blocked and permeabilized with 5% horse serum and 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS (200 uL per well) for 30 min at RT. Cells were washed again with cold PBS three times.
To image, antifade mounting solution with DAPI (Invitrogen, cat. #S36964) was added, slide was covered with a cover slip, and sealed. Beads were imaged at 575–610nm (red) and DAPI at 345–453 nm (blue) using the EVOS® FL Auto Cell Imaging System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). ImageJ was used to quantify red/blue in all images.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed for significance using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons carried out using the post-hoc Bonferroni test on GraphPad Prism (version 8.01). Data are represented as Mean +/− SEM. Groups contain n = 6 unless otherwise specified.
Results
Injury of Brain Endothelial Cells by Exposure to High Glucose Levels and Hypoxia
HBMVECs were either treated with 30 mM glucose (6 h), exposed to hypoxia (1 h), or exposed to hypoxia plus high glucose (6 h). LDH release in the supernatant was measured to estimate lethal cell injury. Treatment of cells with glucose evoked a small but not significant increase in LDH release. In contrast, hypoxia exposure significantly increased LDH release compared to untreated controls (p < 0.001). The level of LDH detected in cells exposed to hypoxia plus high glucose was higher than levels measured in response to hypoxia alone (Fig. 1a).
HBMVEC injury following treatment with high glucose with and without hypoxia HBMVECs were exposed to high glucose (6 h), hypoxia (1 h), or a combination of both (6 h). Cells and supernatant were collected to assess measures of cellular injury: a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release as a measure of cell toxicity, b reactive oxygen species (ROS) production measured with DCF-DA, represented as relative fluorescence units (RFU), and (C) IL-1β secretion in the supernatant measured by ELISA. ***p < 0.001 vs. Control, ###p < 0.001 vs. Glucose, ^p < 0.05 vs. Hypoxia
To explore indices of non-lethal injury the generation of ROS and release of the inflammatory mediator IL-1β were assessed. HBMVECs analyzed using the fluorescent probe DCF-DA to measure ROS showed that glucose treatment did not alter ROS production compared to control cells, while hypoxia exposure increased ROS levels relative to control, but the increase was not significant. HBMVECs exposed to both glucose and hypoxia showed significantly increased production of ROS compared to control (p < 0.001), glucose (p < 0.001), or hypoxia (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1b). Measurement of IL-1β levels in supernatant by ELISA indicated that treatment with glucose increased IL-1β levels, but the increase was not significant (p = 0.11), while hypoxia exposure did not affect IL-1β levels. Interestingly, the combination of glucose treatment and hypoxia exposure appeared to mitigate the increase evoked by glucose alone (Fig. 1c).
Injured Brain Endothelial Cells Increase Reactive Nitrogen Species Production in BV-2 Cells
To determine whether injured endothelial cells can affect reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation in microglia, the microglial cell line BV-2 was treated with HBMVEC-conditioned media for 24 h. The Griess assay was used to assess NO production in the BV-2 supernatant (Fig. 2a) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) levels in BV-2 lysates were analyzed by western blot (Fig. 2b).
HBMVEC injury induces increased nitric oxide production by BV-2 microglia Conditioned media from injured HBMVECs was used to treat BV-2 microglia for 24 h. Supernatant and cell lysate were collected following treatments and used to measure (a) Nitric Oxide (NO) in the supernatant using Griess reagent (n = 12 per group) and (b) expression of iNOS in the lysate by western blot. **p < 0.01 vs. Control, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control, ###p < 0.001 vs. Glucose, ^p < 0.05 vs. Hypoxia, ^^^p < 0.001 vs. Hypoxia.
BV-2 cells exposed to conditioned media from glucose-treated endothelial cell cultures (EC-G) showed a significant increase in both NO production (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2a) and iNOS expression (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2b) compared to BV-2 cells incubated with untreated endothelial cell conditioned media. In contrast, treatment of BV-2 cells with conditioned media from hypoxia-exposed endothelial cells (EC-H) did not affect either NO production or iNOS levels (Fig. 2a, b). Treatment of BV-2 cells with conditioned media from endothelial cells exposed to both glucose and hypoxia (EC-G+H) significantly increased NO production compared to BV-2 cells exposed to conditioned media from only glucose-treated endothelial cell cultures (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in BV-2 iNOS levels evoked by conditioned media from endothelial cells treated with glucose alone and media derived from endothelial cells exposed to both glucose and hypoxia (Fig. 2b).
Glucose-Injured Microvascular Endothelial Cells Induce Changes in Inflammatory Proteins Released from BV-2 Cells
The release of cytokines, TNFα and IL-6, by BV-2 cells treated with HBMVEC-conditioned media for 24 h was assessed by ELISA.
BV-2 cells that were treated with media from glucose-injured endothelial cells (EC-G) released a significantly (p < 0.001) higher level of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNFα compared to microglial cells exposed to control conditioned media (Fig. 3a). On its own, conditioned media from hypoxic-injured endothelial cells (EC-H) did not alter BV-2 production of TNFα. However, media from endothelial cells that were exposed to both glucose and hypoxia (EC−G+H) increased TNFα production in BV-2 to higher levels than elicited by media from glucose-only injured endothelial cells (p < 0.001) (Fig 3a).
HBMVEC injury induces increased production of inflammatory mediators by BV-2 microglia Conditioned media from injured HBMVECs was used to treat BV-2 microglia for 24 h. Supernatant from BV-2 was collected following treatments. ELISA was used to measure secretion of (a) TNFα and (b) IL-6. (c) The enzymatic activity of MMP-9 was measured by gel zymography (n = 3 per group). ***p < 0.001 vs. Control, ###p < 0.001 vs. Glucose, ^^^p < 0.001 vs. Hypoxia.
In contrast to the results obtained for TNFα, the data showed that conditioned media from glucose-injured endothelial cells (EC-G) caused a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in the release of IL-6, a complex cytokine with both pro- and anti-inflammatory activities (Fig. 3b). Conditioned media from hypoxic-injured endothelial cells (EC-H) did not affect BV-2 IL-6 levels. Also, media from endothelial cells exposed to both glucose and hypoxia (EC−G+H) showed a decrease in IL-6 release that was comparable to that observed for glucose alone (EC-G) (Fig. 3b).
Supernatant from BV-2 cells was collected following treatment with HBMVEC-conditioned media for 24 h, as described above, and MMP-9 activity measured by gel zymography. Conditioned media from hypoxia exposed endothelial cells (EC-H) did not affect MMP-9 activity (Fig. 3c). There was a significant (p < 0.001) increase in MMP-9 activity, relative to controls, elicited media from glucose only (EC−G) and glucose plus hypoxia (EC−G+H) (Fig. 3c).
BV-2 Treated with Conditioned Media from Injured Brain Endothelial Cells Show Altered Expression of Microglia Activation Markers
BV-2 cells were treated with HBMVEC-conditioned media for 24 h, as described above, and western blot used to determine changes in protein expression for several microglia activation- and DAM-related markers.
Changes in the expression of CD11c and CLEC7A by BV-2 in response to endothelial cell conditioned media were similar in pattern, differing slightly in magnitude. Conditioned media from glucose-injured endothelial cells (EC-G) significantly increased expression of CD11c (p < 0.01) (Fig. 4a) and CLEC7A (p < 0.01) (Fig. 4b) as did conditioned media from glucose plus hypoxia injury (EC-G+H) for both CD11c (p < 0.01) and CLEC7A (p < 0.05). Exposure of BV-2 cells to HBMVEC-conditioned media collected as described above did not affect expression of TREM2 (data not shown).
BV-2 treated with conditioned media from injured HBMVEC show altered expression of microglia activation markers Conditioned media from injured HBMVECs was used to treat BV-2 microglia for 24 h. Western blot was used to assess the expression of microglia markers, (a) CD11c, (b) CLEC7A, and (c) P2RY12. *p < 0.05 vs. Control, **p < 0.01 vs. Control, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control, ^p < 0.05 vs. Hypoxia, ^^p < 0.01 vs. Hypoxia
Western blot was also used to assess the expression of a homeostatic microglia marker, P2RY12. Expression of P2RY12 was significantly decreased when BV-2 cells were treated with media from glucose injury (EC-G) (p < 0.001), hypoxic injury (EC-H) (p < 0.01), or glucose plus hypoxic injury (EC-G+H) (p < 0.001) compared to controls (Fig. 4c). Together, these changes indicate a shift towards a DAM phenotype in the BV-2 treated with conditioned media from damaged brain endothelial cells.
The Phagocytic Ability of BV-2 Cells is Altered in Response to Conditioned Media from Injured Endothelial Cells
BV-2 cells were treated for 24 h with HBMVEC-conditioned media, as described above, and uptake of fluorescently labeled beads measured to assess phagocytic ability (Fig. 5a and b). Bead uptake by BV-2 cells treated with glucose injury media (EC-G) was significantly increased (p < 0.05) compared to controls. In contrast, conditioned media from hypoxic injury (EC−H) did not significantly alter phagocytic ability of BV-2 cells. However, treatment of BV-2 with conditioned media from glucose plus hypoxia injury (EC−G+H) significantly (p < 0.001) reduced the phagocytic response compared to glucose injury alone conditioned media (EC-G) (Fig. 5c).
BV-2 treated with conditioned media from injured HBMVEC show altered phagocytic ability Conditioned media from injured HBMVEC was used to treat BV-2 microglia for 24 h. BV-2 were then incubated with fluorescently labeled beads for 1 h. Cells were then imaged (EC-C, EC-G, EC-H, EC-G+H left to right) at 10X (a) and 20X (b) and bead uptake per cell was quantified (c) as a measure of phagocytic activity. *p < 0.05 vs. Control, ###p < 0.001 vs. Glucose.
Discussion
The results of this study demonstrate that injured brain endothelial cells can negatively impact the inflammatory/activation state of microglia. These data highlight the importance of cellular cross-talk in the brain, especially among cells in the NVU. The ability of injured endothelial cells to induce changes in microglia, consistent with microglia alterations observed in AD, suggests that this cell-cell interaction is contributory to the development of pathology in AD.
Our data show that brain endothelial cells injured by glucose and hypoxia induce increases in microglial production of NO and TNFα. These inflammatory mediators have been well documented to be elevated in the AD brain in several cell types, including microglia (Hickman et al. 2018). Similarly, our results showing increases in microglial MMP-9 expression by injured endothelial cell conditioned media are consistent with literature documenting elevated MMP-9 in AD (Lorenzl et al. 2003). These results suggest that an injured endothelium may promote the transition of microglia toward an inflammatory phenotype.
Microglia were previously classified dichotomously into M1 and M2 phenotypes using Iba1 as a marker to identify “activated” microglia (Ito et al. 1998). Based on comprehensive gene expression profiling and functional studies, a more fluid spectrum of activation states has been recognized to exist, with the DAM phenotype identified in the AD brain. The DAM phenotype exhibits downregulation of homeostatic microglia genes and upregulation of pro-inflammatory and neurodegeneration-associated genes (Keren-Shaul et al. 2017; Krasemann et al. 2017). Our findings that injured endothelial cells significantly increase microglial expression of DAM-related markers CD11c and CLEC7A, as well as decrease expression of the homeostatic marker P2RY12, suggest conversion of microglia towards a DAM-like phenotype.
Interestingly, treatment of microglial cultures with conditioned media from injured endothelial cells did not affect the expression of TREM2. Although mutations in TREM2 are related to increased AD risk, its precise role is unclear (Jay et al. 2017). One could interpret the lack of effect on TREM2 as a peculiarity related to BV-2 cells and not indicative of microglia in vitro or in vivo. Although there are limitations in using an immortalized cell system to approximate primary cell behavior in vitro, BV-2 cells have been shown to closely model the inflammatory response of primary microglia in vitro (Stansley et al. 2012). In addition, the response of BV-2 cells to LPS has substantial overlap to the response of primary cultured microglia as well as to that of microglia in vivo (Henn et al. 2009). A recent study documented that conversion of microglia to the DAM phenotype occurs in a TREM-independent phase followed by a TREM-dependent phase (Keren-Shaul et al. 2017). It is possible that in our study the transition to the DAM phenotype is not yet complete.
Phagocytosis is a key aspect of microglial function in the healthy brain, responsible for clearance of debris, apoptotic cells, and synaptic pruning (Fu et al. 2014; Hickman et al. 2018). In AD, phagocytic microglia may help to clear aggregated amyloid-β (Aβ) and be beneficial (Fu et al. 2014). In this regard, increased phagocytic activity is correlated with enhanced production of anti-inflammatory and reduced production of pro-inflammatory mediators in microglia and macrophages (Fadok et al. 1998; Wolf et al. 2017; Janda et al. 2018). However, there is still some debate as to whether microglia phagocytosis is beneficial or detrimental in disease. For example, TREM2 mediated phagocytosis of apoptotic neurons is associated with decreased a decreased pro-inflammatory response (Takahashi et al. 2005), while myelin debris phagocytosis enhanced the pro-inflammatory and dampened the anti-inflammatory profile in microglia (Siddiqui et al. 2016). TREM2 knock out mice have impaired phagocytosis, related to increased Aβ plaque burden, reduced microglia localization to plaques, and increased neuritic dystrophy ( Jay et al. 2017; Hickman et al. 2018). DAM exhibit upregulation of phagocytosis-related genes (Keren-Shaul et al. 2017), while other studies indicate that an anti-inflammatory DAM sub-type highly express phagocytosis-associated genes (Rangaraju et al. 2018). Here, the response of BV-2 cells to conditioned media from injured endothelial cells appears to be related to the nature of the endothelial insult. The data show that microglial phagocytosis is increased in response to conditioned media from glucose-injured endothelial cells. In contrast, conditioned media from hypoxia-injured endothelial cells does not significantly alter phagocytosis and further, media from glucose plus hypoxic injured endothelial cells reduces the increase in phagocytosis evoked by glucose alone. These data are similar to the results showing that glucose but not hypoxia increases IL-1β release from endothelial cells and that concurrent hypoxia plus glucose reduces the increase in IL-1β produced by glucose alone. These results support the idea that IL-1β from injured endothelial cells promotes increased phagocytosis by microglia. Other studies have also linked IL-1β to increased microglial phagocytosis as well as to microglial autophagy, a process closely linked to phagocytosis (Ferreira et al. 2011; François et al. 2013; Plaza-Zabala et al. 2017).
Considerable evidence documents an injured cerebrovasculature in AD (Grammas 2011). We have previously shown that damaged brain endothelial cells secrete a number of factors that have been related to neuroinflammation and the activation of pro-inflammatory microglia, including thrombin, MMPs, and a number of cytokines (Grammas and Ovase 2001; Grammas and Ovase 2002; Grammas et al. 2004; Grammas et al. 2011; K Lee et al. 2015; Krasnow et al. 2017). Our findings indicate a role for vascular-derived IL-1β and ROS in propagating the inflammatory cycle in the brain. Here, brain endothelial cells injured by glucose and glucose plus hypoxia exhibit an upregulation in IL-1β and ROS, respectively, and these increases were correlated with the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory markers in microglia. IL-1β acts as an amplifier of immune reactions and can stimulate a number of downstream neuroinflammatory processes. In the periphery, IL-1β stimulated the differentiation of monocytes to M1-like macrophages (Bent et al. 2018). In vitro, IL-1β enhanced microglia release of NO following LPS stimulation (Possel et al. 2000). High levels of oxidative stress have been identified in the AD brain, and ROS function as mediators of injury and inflammation (Fischer and Maier 2015). ROS-mediated signaling pathways are relevant for the induction of inflammatory signaling, including the stimulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and NO (Fischer and Maier 2015). TNFα, NO, and MMP-9 are all produced in response to both oxidative stress and cytokine signaling (Yong et al. 2001; Clark et al. 2010; Hsieh and Yang 2013; Fischer and Maier 2015), highlighting the potential for these endothelial-derived mediators to activate a pro-inflammatory response in microglia similar to that shown in our in vitro system.
Endothelial cells may react to injurious stimuli such as glucose and hypoxia by activating multiple signaling pathways resulting in the release of diverse mediators (Eelen et al. 2015). In some instances, these mediators could synergize, as we observed for NO release by microglia which was higher when treated with conditioned media from glucose plus hypoxic injury compared to glucose alone. In contrast, the combination of hypoxic and glucose injury reduced the increase in microglial phagocytosis evoked by glucose-only injured endothelial cells. Finally, the responses of cytokines as a family may also vary with individual proteins. In this regard, while TNFα expression by microglia was increased by glucose-injured endothelial cells, IL-6 expression was significantly inhibited. Although mostly regarded as a pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-6 also has many regenerative or anti-inflammatory activities (Scheller et al. 2011). The pleiotropic actions of IL-6 as both a proinflammatory mediator as well as a neurotrophic factor involved in the physiological homeostasis of the CNS further highlight the complexity of cellular responses in the presence of multiple bioactive moieties.
The relationship between brain endothelial cells and microglia is a growing area of interest, with early findings indicating that damage to brain endothelial cells by a number of mediators can induce an inflammatory response in microglia. Microglia treated with conditioned media from IL-1-treated endothelial cells exhibit increased expression of inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β, IL-6, and CCL2 (Zhu et al. 2019). Treatment of microglia with conditioned media from brain endothelial cells exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) exhibited increases in cytokine release, including TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-10. These microglia additionally exhibited upregulated iNOS expression and impaired phagocytosis (Xing et al. 2018). The OGD-related findings mirror our results in the EC-G and EC-GH microglia treatment groups, particularly with respect to increases in TNFα and iNOS, as well as altered phagocytic ability. Together, these studies further support our hypothesis that the damaged cerebrovasculature can be a driver of inflammation in the brain, and indicate that damage by different mediators may activate diverse inflammatory responses in microglia.
Conclusions
The results of this study are important as they shed light on the interaction of two cell types, endothelial cells and microglia, likely important in the development of AD pathology. The role of specific mediators in this cell-cell communication is difficult to ascribe because of the inherent limitations of using a simplified in vitro system. Nevertheless, the demonstration that injury to brain endothelial cells by glucose and hypoxia, two insults that are relevant for diabetes, affects processes in microglia that are relevant for AD, support the hypothesis that the cerebral microcirculation could be a nidus where diabetic processes promote the development of AD. A more in-depth investigation of how endothelial cell damage can alter microglia function and lead to an inflammatory response may help us to better understand the neuroinflammation found in AD and other neurodegenerative disorders. Additionally, greater knowledge of the mediators responsible for this endothelial cell-microglia crosstalk could inform novel therapeutic targets and techniques for mitigating disease-related inflammation at its potential point of origin, the vasculature.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
Alzheimer’s disease
- CVRF:
-
Cardiovascular risk factor
- T2D:
-
Type II diabetes mellitus
- AGE:
-
Advanced glycation end product
- ROS:
-
Reactive oxygen species
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- BBB:
-
Blood-brain barrier
- NOX:
-
NADPH oxidase
- TNFα:
-
Tumor necrosis factor-α
- MMP:
-
Matrix metalloproteinase
- MCP-1:
-
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- ICAM-1:
-
Intercellular adhesion molecule-1
- CAP37:
-
Cationic antimicrobial protein 37 kDa
- NO:
-
Nitric oxide
- TGF-β:
-
Transforming growth factor-β
- IL:
-
Interleukin
- NVU:
-
Neurovascular unit
- DAM:
-
Disease associated microglia
- MGnD:
-
Microglial neurodegenerative phenotype
- CR1:
-
Complement receptor 1
- TREM2:
-
Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2
- HBMVEC:
-
Human brain microvascular endothelial cell
- DMEM:
-
Dulbeccos’s Modified Eagle Medium
- Ab/Am:
-
Antibiotic/Antimycotic
- FBS:
-
Fetal bovine serum
- BSA:
-
Bovine serum albumin
- LDH:
-
Lactate dehydrogenase
- RT:
-
Room temperature
- DCF-DA:
-
2’,7’-Dichlorofluorescin diacetate
- PBS:
-
Phosphate buffered saline
- ELISA:
-
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
- PFA:
-
Paraformaldehyde
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- RNS:
-
Reactive nitrogen species
- iNOS:
-
Inducible nitric oxide synthase
- Aβ:
-
Amyloid-β
References
Akiyama H et al (2000) Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Ag 21:383–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00124-x
Bent R, Moll L, Grabbe S, Bros M (2018) Interleukin-1 Beta-A friend or foe in malignancies? Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082155
Blake R, Trounce IA (2014) Mitochondrial dysfunction and complications associated with diabetes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1840:1404–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.11.007
Bogush M, Heldt NA, Persidsky Y (2017) Blood brain barrier injury in diabetes: unrecognized effects on brain and cognition. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 12:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-017-9752-7
Cai Q, Li Y, Pei G (2017) Polysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum attenuate microglia-mediated neuroinflammation and modulate microglial phagocytosis and behavioural response. J Neuroinflamm 14:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0839-0
Calsolaro V, Edison P (2016) Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: current evidence and future directions. Alzheimers Dement 12:719–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.010
Chitnis T, Weiner HL (2017) CNS inflammation and neurodegeneration. J Clin Invest 127:3577–3587. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci90609
Clark IA, Alleva LM, Vissel B (2010) The roles of TNF in brain dysfunction and disease. Pharmacol Ther 128:519–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.08.007
Dickstein DL, Walsh J, Brautigam H, Stockton SD Jr, Gandy S, Hof PR (2010) Role of vascular risk factors and vascular dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Mt Sinai J Med 77:82–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.20155
Dorheim MA, Tracey WR, Pollock JS, Grammas P (1994) Nitric oxide synthase activity is elevated in brain microvessels in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 205:659–665. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1994.2716
Dudvarski Stankovic N, Teodorczyk M, Ploen R, Zipp F, Schmidt MHH (2016) Microglia-blood vessel interactions: a double-edged sword in brain pathologies. Acta Neuropathol 131:347–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1524-y
Eelen G, de Zeeuw P, Simons M, Carmeliet P (2015) Endothelial cell metabolism in normal and diseased vasculature. Circ Res 116:1231–1244. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.116.302855
Fadok VA, Bratton DL, Konowal A, Freed PW, Westcott JY, Henson PM (1998) Macrophages that have ingested apoptotic cells in vitro inhibit proinflammatory cytokine production through autocrine/paracrine mechanisms involving TGF-beta, PGE2, and PAF. J Clin Invest 101:890–898. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci1112
Fakhoury M (2018) Microglia and astrocytes in alzheimer’s disease: implications for therapy. Curr Neuropharmacol 16:508–518. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159x15666170720095240
Ferreira R, Santos T, Viegas M, Cortes L, Bernardino L, Vieira OV, Malva JO (2011) Neuropeptide Y inhibits interleukin-1β-induced phagocytosis by microglial cells. J Neuroinflammation 8:169. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-8-169
Fischer R, Maier O (2015) Interrelation of oxidative stress and inflammation in neurodegenerative disease: role of TNF. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2015:610813. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/610813
François A, Terro F, Janet T, Rioux Bilan A, Paccalin M, Page G (2013) Involvement of interleukin-1β in the autophagic process of microglia: relevance to Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflamm 10:151. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-10-151
Frohman EM, Frohman TC, Gupta S, de Fougerolles A, van den Noort S (1991) Expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci 106:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510x(91)90202-i
Fu R, Shen Q, Xu P, Luo JJ, Tang Y (2014) Phagocytosis of microglia in the central nervous system diseases. Mol Neurobiol 49:1422–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-013-8620-6
Grammas P (2011) Neurovascular dysfunction, inflammation and endothelial activation: implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflamm 8:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-8-26
Grammas P, Ottman T, Reimann-Philipp U, Larabee J, Weigel PH (2004) Injured brain endothelial cells release neurotoxic thrombin. J Alzheimers Dis 6:275–281
Grammas P, Ovase R (2001) Inflammatory factors are elevated in brain microvessels in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Ag 22:837–842
Grammas P, Ovase R (2002) Cerebrovascular transforming growth factor-beta contributes to inflammation in the Alzheimer’s disease brain. Am J Pathol 160:1583–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61105-4
Grammas P, Tripathy D, Sanchez A, Yin X, Luo J (2011) Brain microvasculature and hypoxia-related proteins in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 4:616–627
Gudala K, Bansal D, Schifano F, Bhansali A (2013) Diabetes mellitus and risk of dementia: a meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. J Diabetes Investig 4:640–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12087
Guerreiro R et al (2013) TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 368:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211851
Hanisch UK, Kettenmann H (2007) Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat Neurosci 10:1387–1394. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1997
Helzner EP, Luchsinger JA, Scarmeas N, Cosentino S, Brickman AM, Glymour MM, Stern Y (2009) Contribution of vascular risk factors to the progression in Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 66:343–348. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.66.3.343
Henn A, Lund S, Hedtjärn M, Schrattenholz A, Pörzgen P, Leist M (2009) The suitability of BV2 cells as alternative model system for primary microglia cultures or for animal experiments examining brain inflammation. Altex 26:83–94. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2009.2.83
Hickman S, Izzy S, Sen P, Morsett L, El Khoury J (2018) Microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat Neurosci 21:1359–1369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0242-x
Hofman A et al (1997) Atherosclerosis, apolipoprotein E, and prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in the Rotterdam Study. Lancet 349:151–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09328-2
Hsieh HL, Yang CM (2013) Role of redox signaling in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. Biomed Res Int 2013:484613. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/484613
Ito D, Imai Y, Ohsawa K, Nakajima K, Fukuuchi Y, Kohsaka S (1998) Microglia-specific localisation of a novel calcium binding protein, Iba1. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 57:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-328x(98)00040-0
Janda E, Boi L, Carta AR (2018) Microglial phagocytosis and its regulation: a therapeutic target in parkinson’s disease? Front Mol Neurosci 11:144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2018.00144
Janson J, Laedtke T, Parisi JE, O’Brien P, Petersen RC, Butler PC (2004) Increased risk of type 2 diabetes in Alzheimer disease. Diabetes 53:474–481. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.53.2.474
Jay TR, von Saucken VE, Landreth GE (2017) TREM2 in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Neurodegener 12:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-017-0197-5
Jones L et al (2010) Genetic evidence implicates the immune system and cholesterol metabolism in the aetiology of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 5:e13950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013950
Jonsson T et al (2013) Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 368:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211103
Keren-Shaul H et al (2017) A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of alzheimer’s disease. Cell 169:1276-1290.e1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018
Krasemann S et al (2017) The TREM2-APOE pathway drives the transcriptional phenotype of dysfunctional microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunity 47:566-581.e569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.08.008
Krasnow SM, Knoll JG, Verghese SC, Levasseur PR, Marks DL (2017) Amplification and propagation of interleukin-1beta signaling by murine brain endothelial and glial cells. J Neuroinflammation 14:133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0908-4
Lambert JC et al (2013) Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 45:1452–1458. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2802
Lane CA, Hardy J, Schott JM (2018) Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol 25:59–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13439
Lee JY, Choi HY, Yune TY (2015) MMP-3 secreted from endothelial cells of blood vessels after spinal cord injury activates microglia, leading to oligodendrocyte cell death. Neurobiol Dis 82:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2015.06.002
Lian H, Litvinchuk A, Chiang AC, Aithmitti N, Jankowsky JL, Zheng H (2016) Astrocyte-microglia cross talk through complement activation modulates amyloid pathology in mouse models of alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 36:577–589. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2117-15.2016
Lontchi-Yimagou E, Sobngwi E, Matsha TE, Kengne AP (2013) Diabetes mellitus and inflammation. Curr Diab Rep 13:435–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-013-0375-y
Lorenzl S et al (2003) Increased plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int 43:191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-0186(03)00004-4
Lucin KM et al (2013) Microglial beclin 1 regulates retromer trafficking and phagocytosis and is impaired in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 79:873–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.046
Ma H et al (2017) Cosmetic applications of glucitol-core containing gallotannins from a proprietary phenolic-enriched red maple (Acer rubrum) leaves extract: inhibition of melanogenesis via down-regulation of tyrosinase and melanogenic gene expression in B16F10 melanoma cells. Arch Dermatol Res 309:265–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-017-1728-1
Matsuoka Y et al (2001) Inflammatory responses to amyloidosis in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol 158:1345–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64085-0
McConnell HL, Kersch CN, Woltjer RL, Neuwelt EA (2017) The translational significance of the neurovascular unit. J Biol Chem 292:762–770. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R116.760215
Muoio V, Persson PB, Sendeski MM (2014) The neurovascular unit - concept review. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 210:790–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.12250
Ott A, Stolk RP, van Harskamp F, Pols HA, Hofman A, Breteler MM (1999) Diabetes mellitus and the risk of dementia: the rotterdam study. Neurology 53:1937–1942. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.9.1937
Pereira HA, Kumar P, Grammas P (1996) Expression of CAP37, a novel inflammatory mediator, in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 17:753–759
Plaza-Zabala A, Sierra-Torre V, Sierra A (2017) Autophagy and Microglia: Novel Partners in Neurodegeneration and Aging. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030598
Possel H, Noack H, Putzke J, Wolf G, Sies H (2000) Selective upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and cytokines in microglia: in vitro and in vivo studies. Glia 32:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-1136(200010)32:1%3c51::aid-glia50%3e3.0.co;2-4
Presta I et al (2018) Innate Immunity Cells and the Neurovascular Unit. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123856
Rangaraju S et al (2018) Identification and therapeutic modulation of a pro-inflammatory subset of disease-associated-microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 13:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-018-0254-8
Rom S et al (2019) Hyperglycemia-Driven Neuroinflammation Compromises BBB Leading to Memory Loss in Both Diabetes Mellitus (DM) Type 1 and Type 2 Mouse Models. Mol Neurobiol 56:1883–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1195-5
Scheller J, Chalaris A, Schmidt-Arras D, Rose-John S (2011) The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813:878–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.034
Siddiqui TA, Lively S, Schlichter LC (2016) Complex molecular and functional outcomes of single versus sequential cytokine stimulation of rat microglia. J Neuroinflamm 13:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-016-0531-9
Stansley B, Post J, Hensley K (2012) A comparative review of cell culture systems for the study of microglial biology in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflamm 9:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-115
Stefano GB, Challenger S, Kream RM (2016) Hyperglycemia-associated alterations in cellular signaling and dysregulated mitochondrial bioenergetics in human metabolic disorders. Eur J Nutr 55:2339–2345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-016-1212-2
Takahashi K, Rochford CD, Neumann H (2005) Clearance of apoptotic neurons without inflammation by microglial triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2. J Exp Med 201:647–657. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20041611
Thirumangalakudi L, Samany PG, Owoso A, Wiskar B, Grammas P (2006) Angiogenic proteins are expressed by brain blood vessels in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 10:111–118
Thirumangalakudi L, Yin L, Rao HV, Grammas P (2007) IL-8 induces expression of matrix metalloproteinases, cell cycle and pro-apoptotic proteins, and cell death in cultured neurons. J Alzheimers Dis 11:305–311. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2007-11307
Tolppanen AM, Solomon A, Soininen H, Kivipelto M (2012) Midlife vascular risk factors and Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from epidemiological studies. J Alzheimers Dis 32:531–540. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2012-120802
Wolf SA, Boddeke HW, Kettenmann H (2017) Microglia in physiology and disease. Annu Rev Physiol 79:619–643. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034406
Xing C, Li W, Deng W, Ning M, Lo EH (2018) A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes. J Neuroinflamm 15:143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1189-2
Yaffe K et al (2014) Early adult to midlife cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive function. Circulation 129:1560–1567. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.004798
Yong VW, Power C, Forsyth P, Edwards DR (2001) Metalloproteinases in biology and pathology of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:502–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/35081571
Zhang M et al (2017) The cystathionine beta-synthase/hydrogen sulfide pathway contributes to microglia-mediated neuroinflammation following cerebral ischemia. Brain Behav Immun 66:332–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2017.07.156
Zhu L et al (2019) Interleukin-1 causes CNS inflammatory cytokine expression via endothelia-microglia bi-cellular signaling. Brain Behav Immun 81:292–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.026
Funding
This research was funded by National Institutes of Health grant number 1R21NS110628-01. This work was also generously supported by funding from Cure Alzheimer’s Fund. Research was made possible by the use of the LiCor Odyssey available through the Rhode Island Institutional Development Award (IDeA) Network of Research Excellence from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103430).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JI conceptualized the study and is responsible for cell treatments and all data collected. HVR assisted in conceptualization and treatment of endothelial cells. JI and PG were major contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Iannucci, J., Rao, H.V. & Grammas, P. High Glucose and Hypoxia-Mediated Damage to Human Brain Microvessel Endothelial Cells Induces an Altered, Pro-Inflammatory Phenotype in BV-2 Microglia In Vitro. Cell Mol Neurobiol 42, 985–996 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-020-00987-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-020-00987-z
Keywords
- Vascular
- Inflammation
- Endothelial
- Microglia
- Alzheimer’s disease