Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Different cellulose nanofibers impact properties of calcium phosphate silicate cement for bone tissue engineering

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cellulose Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aging-related abnormal bone metabolism can have detrimental effects on bone microstructure and significantly increases fracture occurrence in the older population. Injectable bone cement has been commonly used to augment porous and fragile bones. The self-setting calcium phosphate silicate cement (CPSC) has recently been proven suitable for bone tissue engineering. Unfortunately, the inadequate mechanical properties of CPSC limit its utilization as implants for load-bearing applications. One primary purpose of this study is to improve the mechanical properties of CPSC using different cellulose nanofibers (CNFs). It is shown that the mechanical properties of CPSC could be enhanced by adding 2% mass fractions of CNFs, carboxylate CNFs (CNF-C) and silanized CNFs (CNF-SH), and the reinforcing effects on the mechanical property of CPSC could be ranked as CNF-SH > CNFs > CNF-C. In addition, the Young's modulus of the CPSC pellet modified with CNF-SH (~ 10 GPa) was proved to be close to that of trabecular bone (~ 11.4 GPa). Unlike other studies, where the mechanical properties of bone cement were improved at the cost of decreasing handleability, our approach could simultaneously increase both qualities of the CPSC paste. Furthermore, the in vitro biocompatibility analyses proved that the nanofiber-modified CPSC was biocompatible and encouraged the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast cells. In summary, the injectable CPSC bone cement can be better enhanced by CNF-SH than CNFs or CNF-C, and the resultant nanofiber-reinforced bone cement is a promising candidate as a bone substitute biomaterial.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors disclose receipts of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article: This work was sponsored by Project 51502034, 51872042 and 82101525 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Project 2021-YGJC-12 support by Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province.

Funding

The authors disclose receipts of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article: This work was sponsored by Project 51502034, 51872042 and 82101525 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Project 2021-YGJC-12 support by Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by XJ and YC, the in vitro assays were accomplished by XL and JZ, and data visualization was processed by JZ. TG and QW wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tianxing Gong or Qiong Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, T., Ji, X., Liu, X. et al. Different cellulose nanofibers impact properties of calcium phosphate silicate cement for bone tissue engineering. Cellulose 30, 1011–1029 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04942-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04942-7

Keywords

Navigation