Abstract
Aging-related abnormal bone metabolism can have detrimental effects on bone microstructure and significantly increases fracture occurrence in the older population. Injectable bone cement has been commonly used to augment porous and fragile bones. The self-setting calcium phosphate silicate cement (CPSC) has recently been proven suitable for bone tissue engineering. Unfortunately, the inadequate mechanical properties of CPSC limit its utilization as implants for load-bearing applications. One primary purpose of this study is to improve the mechanical properties of CPSC using different cellulose nanofibers (CNFs). It is shown that the mechanical properties of CPSC could be enhanced by adding 2% mass fractions of CNFs, carboxylate CNFs (CNF-C) and silanized CNFs (CNF-SH), and the reinforcing effects on the mechanical property of CPSC could be ranked as CNF-SH > CNFs > CNF-C. In addition, the Young's modulus of the CPSC pellet modified with CNF-SH (~ 10 GPa) was proved to be close to that of trabecular bone (~ 11.4 GPa). Unlike other studies, where the mechanical properties of bone cement were improved at the cost of decreasing handleability, our approach could simultaneously increase both qualities of the CPSC paste. Furthermore, the in vitro biocompatibility analyses proved that the nanofiber-modified CPSC was biocompatible and encouraged the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast cells. In summary, the injectable CPSC bone cement can be better enhanced by CNF-SH than CNFs or CNF-C, and the resultant nanofiber-reinforced bone cement is a promising candidate as a bone substitute biomaterial.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An J, Liao H, Kucko NW, Herber RP, Wolke JGC, van den Beucken JJ, Jansen JA, Leeuwenburgh SCG (2016) Long-term evaluation of the degradation behavior of three apatite-forming calcium phosphate cements. J Biomed Mater Res A 104:1072–1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35641
Bellows CG, Aubin JE, Heersche JNM, Antosz ME (1986) Mineralized bone nodules formedin vitro from enzymatically released rat calvaria cell populations. Calcif Tissue Int 38:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556874
Bohl DD, Sershon RA, Saltzman BM, Darrith B, Della Valle CJ (2018) Incidence, risk factors, and clinical implications of pneumonia after surgery for geriatric hip fracture. J Arthroplast 33:1552–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.068
Bohner M, Baroud G (2005) Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes. Biomaterials 26:1553–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.010
Burguera EF, Xu HHK, Weir MD (2006) Injectable and rapid-setting calcium phosphate bone cement with dicalcium phosphate dihydrate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 77:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30403
Castro AGB, Polini A, Azami Z, Leeuwenburgh SCG, Jansen JA, Yang F, van den Beucken JJ (2017) Incorporation of PLLA micro-fillers for mechanical reinforcement of calcium-phosphate cement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 71:286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.027
Collignon H, Davicco MJ, Barlet JP (1997) Isolation of cells from ovine fetal long bone and characterization of their osteoblastic activities during in vitro mineralization. Arch Physiol Biochem 105:158–166. https://doi.org/10.1076/apab.105.2.158.12924
Curvello R, Raghuwanshi VS, Garnier G (2019) Engineering nanocellulose hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 267:47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2019.03.002
de Lacerda SS, Pinto JC, Jansen J, Leeuwenburgh SCG, van den Beucken JJ (2020) Tough and injectable fiber reinforced calcium phosphate cement as an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate cement for vertebral augmentation: a biomechanical study. Biomater Sci 8:4239–4250. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM00413H
Deng M, Han J, Liu H, Qin M, Liang X (2015) Analysis of compressive toughness and deformability of high ductile fiber reinforced concrete. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015:384902. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/384902
Faienza MF, Lassandro G, Chiarito M, Valente F, Ciaccia L, Giordano P (2020) How physical activity across the lifespan can reduce the impact of bone ageing: a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061862
Faruq O, Sayed S, Kim B, Im SB, Lee BT (2020) A biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic scaffold loaded with oxidized cellulose nanofiber-gelatin hydrogel with immobilized simvastatin drug for osteogenic differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 108:1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34471
Gong T, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Liu X, Troczynski T, Häfeli UO (2016a) Osteogenic and anti-osteoporotic effects of risedronate-added calcium phosphate silicate cement. Biomed Mater 11:045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/11/4/045002
Gong T, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Hou M, Liu X, Wang Y, Zhao L, Ruse ND, Troczynski T, Häfeli UO (2016b) A comprehensive study of osteogenic calcium phosphate silicate cement: material characterization and in vitro/in vivo testing. Adv Healthc Mater 5:457–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500469
Gong T, Li T, Meng L, Chen Y, Wu T, Zhou J, Lu G, Wang Z (2022) Fabrication of piezoelectric Ca-P-Si-doped PVDF scaffold by phase-separation-hydration: material characterization, in vitro biocompatibility and osteoblast redifferentiation. Ceram Int 48:6461–6469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.190
Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0NR00583E
Kasugai S, Nagata T, Sodek J (1992) Temporal studies on the tissue compartmentalization of bone sialoprotein (BSP), osteopontin (OPN), and SPARC protein during bone formation in vitro. J Cell Physiol 152:467–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041520305
Komori T (2018) Runx2, an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem Cell Biol 149:313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-018-1640-6
Kucko NW, de Lacerda SS, Sobral Marques T, Herber RP, van den Beucken JJ, Zuo Y, Leeuwenburgh SCG (2019a) Tough and osteocompatible calcium phosphate cements reinforced with poly(vinyl alcohol) fibers. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5:2491–2505. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00226
Kucko NW, Li W, García-Martinez MA, Rehman IU, Ulset AT, Christensen BE, Leeuwenburgh SCG, Herber RP (2019b) Sterilization effects on the handling and degradation properties of calcium phosphate cements containing poly ((D, L) -lactic-co-glycolic acid) porogens and carboxymethyl cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl BiOmater 107:2216–2228. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34306
Kucko NW, Petre DG, de Ruiter M, Herber RP, Leeuwenburgh SCG (2020) Micro- and macromechanical characterization of the influence of surface-modification of poly(vinyl alcohol) fibers on the reinforcement of calcium phosphate cements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 109:103776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103776
Liu W, Zhang J, Weiss P, Tancret F, Bouler JM (2013) The influence of different cellulose ethers on both the handling and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate cements for bone substitution. Acta Biomater 9:5740–5750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.020
Liu T, Cai C, Ma R, Deng Y, Tu L, Fan Y, Lu D (2021) super-hydrophobic cellulose nanofiber air filter with highly efficient filtration and humidity resistance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:24032–24041. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c04258
Lou J, Xu F, Merkel K, Manske P (1999) Gene therapy: adenovirus-mediated human bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene transfer induces mesenchymal progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation in vitro and bone formation in vivo. J Orthop Res 17:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100170108
Madassery S (2020) Vertebral compression fractures: evaluation and management. Semin Intervent Radiol 37:214–219. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709208
Matinfar M, Mesgar AS, Mohammadi Z (2019) Evaluation of physicochemical, mechanical and biological properties of chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose reinforced with multiphasic calcium phosphate whisker-like fibers for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 100:341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.015
Shaban NZ, Kenawy MY, Taha NA, Abd El-Latif MM, Ghareeb DA (2021) cellulose acetate nanofibers: incorporating hydroxyapatite (ha), ha/berberine or ha/moghat composites, as scaffolds to enhance in vitro osteoporotic bone regeneration. Polymers (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234140
Suhm N, Gisep A (2008) Injectable bone cement augmentation for the treatment of distal radius fractures: a review. J Orthop Trauma 22:S121–S125. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181830d13
Sun S, Wang Z, Hao Y (2008) Osterix overexpression enhances osteoblast differentiation of muscle satellite cells in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.024
Voicu G, Jinga SI, Drosu BG, Busuioc C (2017) Improvement of silicate cement properties with bacterial cellulose powder addition for applications in dentistry. Carbohydr Polym 174:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.062
Zhang J, Tancret F, Bouler JM (2011) Fabrication and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate cements (CPC) for bone substitution. Mater Sci Eng, C 31:740–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.10.014
Zhang Y, Wang D, Wang F, Jiang S, Shu Y (2015) Modification of dicalcium silicate bone cement biomaterials by using carboxymethyl cellulose. J Non-Cryst Solids 426:164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.07.014
Zhang Q, Lei Z, Peng M, Zhong M, Wan Y, Luo H (2019) Enhancement of mechanical and biological properties of calcium phosphate bone cement by incorporating bacterial cellulose. Mater Technol 34:800–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2019.1630951
Zhao W, Wang J, Zhai W, Wang Z, Chang J (2005) The self-setting properties and in vitro bioactivity of tricalcium silicate. Biomaterial 26:6113–6121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.025
Zysset PK, Guo XE, Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Goldstein SA (1999) Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. J Biomech 32:1005–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00111-6
Acknowledgments
The authors disclose receipts of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article: This work was sponsored by Project 51502034, 51872042 and 82101525 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Project 2021-YGJC-12 support by Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province.
Funding
The authors disclose receipts of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article: This work was sponsored by Project 51502034, 51872042 and 82101525 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Project 2021-YGJC-12 support by Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by XJ and YC, the in vitro assays were accomplished by XL and JZ, and data visualization was processed by JZ. TG and QW wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, T., Ji, X., Liu, X. et al. Different cellulose nanofibers impact properties of calcium phosphate silicate cement for bone tissue engineering. Cellulose 30, 1011–1029 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04942-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04942-7