Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 4275–4301 | Cite as

3D printing with cellulose materials

  • Qianqian Wang
  • Jianzhong Sun
  • Qian Yao
  • Chencheng Ji
  • Jun Liu
  • Qianqian Zhu
Review Paper

Abstract

With the development of cellulose chemistry and processing technology, the applications of cellulose materials were not limited to traditional fields as engineering materials in forest originated products, paper, and textile industries, but also used for advanced functional applications in the field of biomedical and smart health care, printed electronics, and responsive wearable textiles. With the advantage of sophisticated geometry fabrication and low cost production, 3D printing technologies have been employed with many materials for a variety of applications. This critical review focuses specifically on the development and assessment of cellulose materials for 3D printing. A special focus was paid on extrusion based 3D printing. Detailed examinations of cellulose hydrogel rheology, fiber entanglement, fiber alignment, gelation, printability, shape fidelity, cell viability and processing parameters in extrusion based 3D printing are explored. Other 3D printing techniques such as inkjet 3D printing, 3D spinning, stereolithography, laminated object manufacturing and selective laser sintering are also introduced. The functionality of 3D printed constructs was designed either by cellulose surface modification or by incorporation of functional components. The properties and performances of 3D printed cellulose constructs as well as their potential applications in the fields of medical, electronics, and smart textile are discussed. Finally, perspective and current important limitations of 3D printing with cellulose materials for advanced application are provided.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Cellulose materials Rheology Printability Shape fidelity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31300493), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016T90423, 2015M581740), Young Scholar Award Program of Jiangsu University, and open funding from the State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology (201527), Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy and Material of Jiangsu Province, Institute of Chemical Industry of Forest Products, Chinese Academy of Forestry (JSBEM201605) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution (PAPD). We thank Rana Muhammad Yousaf Saeed for proofreading.

References

  1. Atila D, Keskin D, Tezcaner A (2015) Cellulose acetate based 3-dimensional electrospun scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr Polym 133:251–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.109 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ávila HM, Schwarz S, Rotter N, Gatenholm P (2016) 3d bioprinting of human chondrocyte-laden nanocellulose hydrogels for patient-specific auricular cartilage regeneration. Bioprinting 1:22–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2016.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaeser A, Duarte Campos DF, Puster U, Richtering W, Stevens MM, Fischer H (2016) Controlling shear stress in 3d bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv Healthc Mater 5(3):326–333.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500677 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Celzard A, Fierro V, Kerekes R (2009) Flocculation of cellulose fibres: new comparison of crowding factor with percolation and effective-medium theories. Cellulose 16(6):983–987.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9314-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chai X, Chai H, Wang X, Yang J, Li J, Zhao Y, Cai W, Tao T, Xiang X (2017) Fused deposition modeling (fdm) 3d printed tablets for intragastric floating delivery of domperidone. Sci Rep 7:2829.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03097-x PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chau M, Sriskandha SE, Pichugin D, Therien-Aubin H, Nykypanchuk D, Chauve G, Methot M, Bouchard J, Gang O, Kumacheva E (2015) Ion-mediated gelation of aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromol 16(8):2455–2462.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen L, Wang Q, Hirth K, Baez C, Agarwal UP, Zhu JY (2015) Tailoring the yield and characteristics of wood cellulose nanocrystals (cnc) using concentrated acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 22(3):1753–1762.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0615-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chia HN, Wu BM (2015) Recent advances in 3d printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng 9(1):4.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chimene D, Lennox KK, Kaunas RR, Gaharwar AK (2016) Advanced bioinks for 3d printing: a materials science perspective. Ann Biomed Eng 44(6):2090–2102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1638-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chung JHY, Naficy S, Yue ZL, Kapsa R, Quigley A, Moulton SE, Wallace GG (2013) Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells. Biomater Sci 1(7):763–773.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3bm00012e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Correa D, Papadopoulou A, Guberan C, Jhaveri N, Reichert S, Menges A, Tibbits S (2015) 3d-printed wood: programming hygroscopic material transformations. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2(3):106–116.  https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derby B (2010) Inkjet printing of functional and structural materials: fluid property requirements, feature stability, and resolution. Annu Rev Mater Res 40(1):395–414.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Derby B (2015) Additive manufacture of ceramics components by inkjet printing. Engineering 1(1):113–123.  https://doi.org/10.15302/J-ENG-2015014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong J, Li M, Zhou L, Lee S, Mei C, Xu X, Wu Q (2017) The influence of grafted cellulose nanofibers and postextrusion annealing treatment on selected properties of poly(lactic acid) filaments for 3d printing. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 55(11):847–855.  https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Du X, Zhang Z, Liu W, Deng Y (2017) Nanocellulose-based conductive materials and their emerging applications in energy devices—a review. Nano Energy 35:299–320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dumanli AG (2017) Nanocellulose and its composites for biomedical applications. Curr Med Chem 24(5):512–528.  https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867323666161014124008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fall AB, Lindström SB, Sprakel J, Wågberg L (2013) A physical cross-linking process of cellulose nanofibril gels with shear-controlled fibril orientation. Soft Matter 9(6):1852–1863.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm27223g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feng X, Yang Z, Chmely S, Wang Q, Wang S, Xie Y (2017) Lignin-coated cellulose nanocrystal filled methacrylate composites prepared via 3d stereolithography printing: mechanical reinforcement and thermal stabilization. Carbohydr Polym 169:272–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Filgueira D, Holmen S, Melbø JK, Moldes D, Echtermeyer AT, Chinga-Carrasco G (2017) Enzymatic-assisted modification of thermomechanical pulp fibers to improve the interfacial adhesion with poly(lactic acid) for 3d printing. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(10):9338–9346.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fu K, Yao Y, Dai J, Hu L (2017) Progress in 3d printing of carbon materials for energy-related applications. Adv Mater 29(9):1603486.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao X, Shi Z, Kuśmierczyk P, Liu C, Yang G, Sevostianov I, Silberschmidt VV (2016) Time-dependent rheological behaviour of bacterial cellulose hydrogel. Mater Sci Eng C 58:153–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gatenholm P, Martinez H, Karabulut E, Amoroso M, Kölby L, Markstedt K, Gatenholm E, Henriksson I (2016) Development of nanocellulose-based bioinks for 3d bioprinting of soft tissue. In: Ovsianikov A, Yoo J, Mironov V (eds) 3d printing and biofabrication. Springer, Cham, pp 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40498-1_14-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies. Springer, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giese M, Blusch LK, Khan MK, MacLachlan MJ (2015) Functional materials from cellulose-derived liquid-crystal templates. Angew Chem Int Ed 54(10):2888–2910.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201407141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gladman AS, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG, Mahadevan L, Lewis JA (2016) Biomimetic 4d printing. Nat Mater 15(4):413–418.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4544 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goole J, Amighi K (2016) 3d printing in pharmaceutics: a new tool for designing customized drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm 499(1–2):376–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen CP, Spence DM (2014) Evaluation of 3d printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 86(7):3240–3253.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac403397r PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunasekera DH, Kuek S, Hasanaj D, He Y, Tuck C, Croft AK, Wildman RD (2016) Three dimensional ink-jet printing of biomaterials using ionic liquids and co-solvents. Faraday Discuss 190:509–523.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5fd00219b PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Habibi Y (2014) Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev 43(5):1519–1542.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60204d PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110(6):3479–3500.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900339w PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Håkansson KMO (2015) Online determination of anisotropy during cellulose nanofibril assembly in a flow focusing device. RSC Adv 5(24):18601–18608.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra12285b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hakansson KM, Fall AB, Lundell F, Yu S, Krywka C, Roth SV, Santoro G, Kvick M, Prahl Wittberg L, Wagberg L, Soderberg LD (2014) Hydrodynamic alignment and assembly of nanofibrils resulting in strong cellulose filaments. Nat Commun 5:4018.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5018 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Håkansson KM, Lundell F, Prahl-Wittberg L, Soderberg LD (2016a) Nanofibril alignment in flow focusing: measurements and calculations. J Phys Chem B 120(27):6674–6686.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b02972 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Håkansson KM, Henriksson IC, de la Peña Vázquez C, Kuzmenko V, Markstedt K, Enoksson P, Gatenholm P (2016b) Solidification of 3d printed nanofibril hydrogels into functional 3d cellulose structures. Adv Mater Technol 1(7):1600096.  https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201600096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, Gao Q, Xia B, Fu J (2016) Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3d bioprinting. Sci Rep 6:29977.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29977 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Henke K, Treml S (2013) Wood based bulk material in 3d printing processes for applications in construction. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 71(1):139–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-012-0658-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Henriksson I, Gatenholm P, Hägg DA (2017) Increased lipid accumulation and adipogenic gene expression of adipocytes in 3d bioprinted nanocellulose scaffolds. Biofabrication 9(1):015022.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa5c1c PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hochleitner G, Jüngst T, Brown TD, Hahn K, Moseke C, Jakob F, Dalton PD, Groll J (2015) Additive manufacturing of scaffolds with sub-micron filaments via melt electrospinning writing. Biofabrication 7(3):035002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoeng F, Denneulin A, Bras J (2016) Use of nanocellulose in printed electronics: a review. Nanoscale 8(27):13131–13154.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr03054h PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, Van Vlierberghe S, Gu L, Ovsianikov A (2016) Bioink properties before, during and after 3d bioprinting. Biofabrication 8(3):032002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hong JK (2015) Bioactive cellulose nanocrystal reinforced 3d printable poly (epsilon-caprolactone) nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. Doctoral thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  42. Hu L, Cui Y (2012) Energy and environmental nanotechnology in conductive paper and textiles. Energy Environ Sci 5(4):6423–6435.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE02414D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hu Z, Cranston ED, Ng R, Pelton R (2014) Tuning cellulose nanocrystal gelation with polysaccharides and surfactants. Langmuir 30(10):2684–2692.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la404977t PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hubbe MA, Tayeb P, Joyce M, Tyagi P, Kehoe M, Dimic-Misic K, Pal L (2017) Rheology of nanocellulose-rich aqueous suspensions: a review. BioResources 12(4):9556–9661.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.4.9556-9661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Isogai A, Bergström L (2018) Preparation of cellulose nanofibers using green and sustainable chemistry. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 12:15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) Tempo-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3(1):71–85.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00583e PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jia C, Bian H, Gao T, Jiang F, Kierzewski IM, Wang Y, Yao Y, Chen L, Shao Z, Zhu JY, Hu L (2017a) Thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals toward high-performance 2d and 3d nanostructures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(34):28922–28929.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b08760 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jia C, Chen L, Shao Z, Agarwal UP, Hu L, Zhu JY (2017b) Using a fully recyclable dicarboxylic acid for producing dispersible and thermally stable cellulose nanomaterials from different cellulosic sources. Cellulose 24(6):2483–2498.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1277-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jungst T, Smolan W, Schacht K, Scheibel T, Groll J (2016) Strategies and molecular design criteria for 3d printable hydrogels. Chem Rev 116(3):1496–1539.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00303 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kalsoom U, Nesterenko PN, Paull B (2016) Recent developments in 3d printable composite materials. RSC Adv 6(65):60355–60371.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra11334f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kariz M, Sernek M, Kuzman MK (2015) Use of wood powder and adhesive as a mixture for 3d printing. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 74(1):123–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0987-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kearns AJ (2017) Cotton cellulose fibers in 3d print material. Master Thesis, North Carolina State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  53. Kearns A, Farahbakhsh N, Venditti R, Jur J (2016) Cotton fibers in 3d printing. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication 2016: Proceedings of the 26th annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium—an additive manufacturing conference, pp 899–905Google Scholar
  54. Kempin W, Franz C, Koster L-C, Schneider F, Bogdahn M, Weitschies W, Seidlitz A (2017) Assessment of different polymers and drug loads for fused deposition modeling of drug loaded implants. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 115(Supplement C):84–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.02.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Yang J, Roberts CJ (2015) 3d printing of five-in-one dose combination polypill with defined immediate and sustained release profiles. J Control Release 217(Supplement C):308–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.028 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kirchmajer DM, Gorkin R III, In het Panhuis M (2015) An overview of the suitability of hydrogel-forming polymers for extrusion-based 3d-printing. J Mater Chem B 3(20):4105–4117.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb00393h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44(22):3358–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24):5438–5466.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kumar S, Hofmann M, Steinmann B, Foster EJ, Weder C (2012) Reinforcement of stereolithographic resins for rapid prototyping with cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4(10):5399–5407.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am301321v PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kyle S, Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Whitaker IS (2017) ‘Printability’ of candidate biomaterials for extrusion based 3d printing: state-of-the-art. Adv Healthc Mater 6(16):1700264.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lauri J, Koponen A, Haavisto S, Czajkowski J, Fabritius T (2017) Analysis of rheology and wall depletion of microfibrillated cellulose suspension using optical coherence tomography. Cellulose 24(11):4715–4728.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1493-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Le Duigou A, Castro M, Bevan R, Martin N (2016) 3d printing of wood fibre biocomposites: from mechanical to actuation functionality. Mater Des 96:106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee M, Kim H-Y (2014) Toward nanoscale three-dimensional printing: nanowalls built of electrospun nanofibers. Langmuir 30(5):1210–1214.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la404704z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Leppiniemi J, Lahtinen P, Paajanen A, Mahlberg R, Metsä-Kortelainen S, Pinomaa T, Pajari H, Vikholm-Lundin I, Pursula P, Hytönen VP (2017) 3d-printable bioactivated nanocellulose–alginate hydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(26):21959–21970.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b02756 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Li Y, Zhu H, Shen F, Wan J, Han X, Dai J, Dai H, Hu L (2014) Highly conductive microfiber of graphene oxide templated carbonization of nanofibrillated cellulose. Adv Funct Mater 24(46):7366–7372.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201402129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Li T, Aspler J, Grenon J, Manfred T, Cormier LM, Zou X (2016a) Printed electronics and 3d printing as new manufacturing technologies-new opportunities for bio-based materials. In: NIP & digital fabrication conference. Society for imaging science and technology, pp 435–441Google Scholar
  67. Li T, Aspler J, Kingsland A, Cormier LM, Zou X (2016b) 3d printing–a review of technologies, markets, and opportunities for the forest industry. J Sci Technol For Prod Process 5(2):30–37Google Scholar
  68. Li H, Tan YJ, Leong KF, Li L (2017a) 3d bioprinting of highly thixotropic alginate/methylcellulose hydrogel with strong interface bonding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(23):20086–20097.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b04216 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Li VC-F, Dunn CK, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Qi HJ (2017b) Direct ink write (diw) 3d printed cellulose nanocrystal aerogel structures. Sci Rep 7:8018.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07771-y PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Li Y, Zhu H, Wang Y, Ray U, Zhu S, Dai J, Chen C, Fu K, Jang SH, Henderson D (2017c) Cellulose-nanofiber-enabled 3d printing of a carbon-nanotube microfiber network. Small Methods 1(10):1700222.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201700222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Li L, Zhu Y, Yang J (2018a) 3d bioprinting of cellulose with controlled porous structures from nmmo. Mater Lett 210:136–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Li VCF, Mulyadi A, Dunn CK, Deng Y, Qi HJ (2018b) Direct ink write 3d printed cellulose nanofiber aerogel structures with highly deformable, shape recoverable, and functionalizable properties. ACS Sustain Chem Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mulhaupt R (2017) Polymers for 3d printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev 117(15):10212–10290.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lille M, Nurmela A, Nordlund E, Metsä-Kortelainen S, Sozer N (2018) Applicability of protein and fiber-rich food materials in extrusion-based 3d printing. J Food Eng 220:20–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lundahl MJ, Klar V, Wang L, Ago M, Rojas OJ (2017) Spinning of cellulose nanofibrils into filaments: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(1):8–19.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, Jungst T, Hennink WE, Dhert WJ, Groll J, Hutmacher DW (2013) 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater 25(36):5011–5028.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302042 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Markstedt K, Sundberg J, Gatenholm P (2014) 3d bioprinting of cellulose structures from an ionic liquid. 3D Print Addit Manuf 1(3):115–121.  https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2014.0004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, Avila HM, Hagg D, Gatenholm P (2015) 3d bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromol 16(5):1489–1496.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Markstedt K, Escalante A, Toriz G, Gatenholm P (2017) Biomimetic inks based on cellulose nanofibrils and cross-linkable xylans for 3d printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(46):40878–40886.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b13400 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Martinez D, Kiiskinen H, Ahlman A-K, Kerekes R (2003) On the mobility of flowing papermaking suspensions and its relationship to formation. J Pulp Pap Sci 29(10):341–347Google Scholar
  81. Mendoza L, Batchelor W, Tabor RF, Garnier G (2018) Gelation mechanism of cellulose nanofibre gels: a colloids and interfacial perspective. J Colloid Interface Sci 509(Supplement C):39–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.101 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mertaniemi H, Escobedo-Lucea C, Sanz-Garcia A, Gandía C, Mäkitie A, Partanen J, Ikkala O, Yliperttula M (2016) Human stem cell decorated nanocellulose threads for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 82:208–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.020 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Montalvo Navarrete JI, Hidalgo-Salazar MA, Escobarnunez E, Rojas Arciniegas AJ (2017) Thermal and mechanical behavior of biocomposites using additive manufacturing. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-017-0411-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40(7):3941–3994.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Müller M, Öztürk E, Arlov Ø, Gatenholm P, Zenobi-Wong M (2017) Alginate sulfate–nanocellulose bioinks for cartilage bioprinting applications. Ann Biomed Eng 45(1):210–223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1704-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3d bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32(8):773–785.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Murphy CA, Collins MN (2016) Microcrystalline cellulose reinforced polylactic acid biocomposite filaments for 3d printing. Polym Compos.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Murphy SV, Skardal A, Atala A (2013) Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 101(1):272–284.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34326 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2014) Rheological properties of micro-/nanofibrillated cellulose suspensions: wall-slip and shear banding phenomena. Carbohydr Polym 112:432–439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.092 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2016) Current progress in rheology of cellulose nanofibril suspensions. Biomacromol 17(7):2311–2320.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Nechyporchuk O, Yu J, Nierstrasz VA, Bordes R (2017) Cellulose nanofibril-based coatings of woven cotton fabrics for improved inkjet printing with a potential in e-textile manufacturing. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(6):4793–4801.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Nguyen D, Hägg DA, Forsman A, Ekholm J, Nimkingratana P, Brantsing C, Kalogeropoulos T, Zaunz S, Concaro S, Brittberg M (2017) Cartilage tissue engineering by the 3d bioprinting of ips cells in a nanocellulose/alginate bioink. Sci Rep 7:658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Oksman K, Aitomäki Y, Mathew AP, Siqueira G, Zhou Q, Butylina S, Tanpichai S, Zhou X, Hooshmand S (2016) Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 83:2–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Oropallo W, Piegl LA (2015) Ten challenges in 3d printing. Eng Comput-Ger 32(1):135–148.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0407-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Oskui SM, Diamante G, Liao C, Shi W, Gan J, Schlenk D, Grover WH (2015) Assessing and reducing the toxicity of 3d-printed parts. Environ Sci Technol Lett 3(1):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, Sun W (2016) Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3d bioplotting of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication 8(3):035020.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pakkanen J, Manfredi D, Minetola P, Iuliano L (2017) About the use of recycled or biodegradable filaments for sustainability of 3d printing. In: International conference on sustainable design and manufacturing. Springer, pp 776–785Google Scholar
  98. Palaganas NB, Mangadlao JD, de Leon ACC, Palaganas JO, Pangilinan KD, Lee YJ, Advincula RC (2017) 3d printing of photocurable cellulose nanocrystal composite for fabrication of complex architectures via stereolithography. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(39):34314–34324.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b09223 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Parandoush P, Lin D (2017) A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos Struct 182(Supplement C):36–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Park JS, Kim T, Kim WS (2017) Conductive cellulose composites with low percolation threshold for 3d printed electronics. Sci Rep 7:3246.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03365-w PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pattinson SW, Hart AJ (2017) Additive manufacturing of cellulosic materials with robust mechanics and antimicrobial functionality. Adv Mater Technol 2(4):1600084.  https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201600084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Paxton N, Smolan W, Bock T, Melchels F, Groll J, Jungst T (2017) Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability. Biofabrication 9(4):044107.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Penttilä A, Sievänen J, Torvinen K, Ojanperä K, Ketoja J (2013) Filler-nanocellulose substrate for printed electronics: experiments and model approach to structure and conductivity. Cellulose 20(3):1413–1424.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9883-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Piras CC, Fernandez-Prieto S, De Borggraeve WM (2017) Nanocellulosic materials as bioinks for 3d bioprinting. Biomater Sci 5(10):1988–1992.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00510e PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pitt K, Lopez-Botello O, Lafferty AD, Todd I, Mumtaz K (2017) Investigation into the material properties of wooden composite structures with in situ fibre reinforcement using additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol 138(Supplement C):32–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Puisto A, Illa X, Mohtaschemi M, Alava M (2012) Modeling the rheology of nanocellulose suspensions. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27(2):277–281.  https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2012-27-02-p277-281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rees A, Powell LC, Chinga-Carrasco G, Gethin DT, Syverud K, Hill KE, Thomas DW (2015) 3d bioprinting of carboxymethylated-periodate oxidized nanocellulose constructs for wound dressing applications. Biomed Res Int 2015:925757.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/925757 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rejeski D, Zhao F, Huang Y (2018) Research needs and recommendations on environmental implications of additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 19:21–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Ribeiro A, Blokzijl MM, Levato R, Visser CW, Castilho M, Hennink WE, Vermonden T, Malda J (2017) Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3d bioprinting. Biofabrication 10(1):014102.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa90e2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Rigotti D, Nguyen VDH, Cataldi A, Pegoretti A (2017) Polyvinyl alcohol reinforced crystalline nanocellulose in 3d printing application. In: The 21st International conference on composites materials. Xi’an, China, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  111. Rosenthal M, Henneberger C, Gutkes A, Bues C-T (2017) Liquid deposition modeling: a promising approach for 3d printing of wood. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 76(2):797–799.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-017-1274-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rymansaib Z (2016) Printing materials and processes for electrochemical applications. University of BathGoogle Scholar
  113. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by tempo-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 8(8):2485–2491.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703970 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Salmoria GV, Klauss P, Paggi RA, Kanis LA, Lago A (2009) Structure and mechanical properties of cellulose based scaffolds fabricated by selective laser sintering. Polym Test 28(6):648–652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Schutz K, Placht AM, Paul B, Bruggemeier S, Gelinsky M, Lode A (2017) Three-dimensional plotting of a cell-laden alginate/methylcellulose blend: towards biofabrication of tissue engineering constructs with clinically relevant dimensions. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 11(5):1574–1587.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2058 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Shafeiei-Sabet S, Hamad WY, Hatzikiriakos SG (2013) Influence of degree of sulfation on the rheology of cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Rheol Acta 52:741–751.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-013-0722-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Shao Y, Chaussy D, Grosseau P, Beneventi D (2015) Use of microfibrillated cellulose/lignosulfonate blends as carbon precursors: impact of hydrogel rheology on 3d printing. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(43):10575–10582.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Shatkin JA, Wegner TH, Bilek ET, Cowie J (2014) Market projections of cellulose nanomaterial-enabled products-part 1: applications. Tappi J 13(5):9–16Google Scholar
  119. Shen X, Shamshina JL, Berton P, Gurau G, Rogers RD (2016) Hydrogels based on cellulose and chitin: fabrication, properties, and applications. Green Chem 18(1):53–75.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5gc02396c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Shin S, Hyun J (2017) Matrix-assisted three-dimensional printing of cellulose nanofibers for paper microfluidics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(31):26438–26446.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b07609 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Shin D-G, Kim T-H, Kim D-E (2017) Review of 4d printing materials and their properties. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol 4(3):349–357.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0040-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Siqueira G, Kokkinis D, Libanori R, Hausmann MK, Gladman AS, Neels A, Tingaut P, Zimmermann T, Lewis JA, Studart AR (2017) Cellulose nanocrystal inks for 3d printing of textured cellular architectures. Adv Funct Mater 27(12):1604619.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201604619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Studart AR (2016) Additive manufacturing of biologically-inspired materials. Chem Soc Rev 45(2):359–376.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00836k PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sultan S, Siqueira G, Zimmermann T, Mathew AP (2017) 3d printing of nano-cellulosic biomaterials for medical applications. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2(Supplement C):29–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tang A, Liu Y, Wang Q, Chen R, Liu W, Fang Z, Wang L (2016) A new photoelectric ink based on nanocellulose/cds quantum dots for screen-printing. Carbohydr Polym 148:29–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.034 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tao Y, Wang H, Li Z, Li P, Shi SQ (2017) Development and application of wood flour-filled polylactic acid composite filament for 3d printing. Materials 10(4):339.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040339 PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Tenhunen T-M, Moslemian O, Kammiovirta K, Harlin A, Kääriäinen P, Österberg M, Tammelin T, Orelma H (2018) Surface tailoring and design-driven prototyping of fabrics with 3d-printing: an all-cellulose approach. Mater Des 140:409–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Torres-Rendon JG, Köpf M, Gehlen D, Blaeser A, Fischer H, Laporte LD, Walther A (2016) Cellulose nanofibril hydrogel tubes as sacrificial templates for freestanding tubular cell constructs. Biomacromol 17(3):905–913.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Tran TN, Bayer IS, Heredia-Guerrero JA, Frugone M, Lagomarsino M, Maggio F, Athanassiou A (2017) Cocoa shell waste biofilaments for 3d printing applications. Macromol Mater Eng 302(11):1700219.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201700219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Ursan ID, Chiu L, Pierce A (2013) Three-dimensional drug printing: a structured review. J Am Pharm Assoc 53(2):136–144.  https://doi.org/10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wang Q, Zhu J (2015) Facile preparation of nanofiller-paper using mixed office paper without deinking. Tappi J 14(3):167–174Google Scholar
  132. Wang Q, Zhu J (2016) Effects of mechanical fibrillation time by disk grinding on the properties of cellulose nanofibrils. Tappi J 15(6):419–423Google Scholar
  133. Wang QQ, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Kuster TA, Baxa U, McNeil SE (2012a) Morphological development of cellulose fibrils of a bleached eucalyptus pulp by mechanical fibrillation. Cellulose 19(5):1631–1643.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9745-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Wang QQ, Zhu JY, Reiner RS, Verrill SP, Baxa U, McNeil SE (2012b) Approaching zero cellulose loss in cellulose nanocrystal (cnc) production: recovery and characterization of cellulosic solid residues (csr) and cnc. Cellulose 19(6):2033–2047.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9765-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Wang QQ, Zhu JY, Considine JM (2013) Strong and optically transparent films prepared using cellulosic solid residue recovered from cellulose nanocrystals production waste stream. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(7):2527–2534.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am302967m PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wang Q, Zhao X, Zhu JY (2014a) Kinetics of strong acid hydrolysis of a bleached kraft pulp for producing cellulose nanocrystals (cncs). Ind Eng Chem Res 53(27):11007–11014.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie501672m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Wang Q, Zhu Q, Xu J, Sun J (2014b) Combined mechanical destruction and alkaline pretreatment of wheat straw for enhanced enzymatic saccharification. BioResources 9(4):6841–6850.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.4.6841-6850 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wang Q, Wei W, Chang F, Sun J, Xie S, Zhu Q (2016) Controlling the size and film strength of individualized cellulose nanofibrils prepared by combined enzymatic pretreatment and high pressure microfluidization. BioResources 11(1):2536–2547.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.1.2536-2547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Wang R, Chen L, Zhu J, Yang R (2017a) Tailored and integrated production of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals (cnc) with nanofibrils (cnf) through maleic acid hydrolysis. ChemNanoMat 3(5):328–335.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cnma.201700015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D (2017b) 3d printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos B Eng 110:442–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wang Z, Xu J, Lu Y, Hu L, Fan Y, Ma J, Zhou X (2017c) Preparation of 3d printable micro/nanocellulose-polylactic acid (MNC/PLA) composite wire rods with high mnc constitution. Ind Crop Prod 109(Supplement C):889–896.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wang J, Chiappone A, Roppolo I, Shao F, Fantino E, Lorusso M, Rentsch D, Dietliker K, Pirri CF, Grutzmacher H (2018) All-in-one cellulose nanocrystals for 3d printing of nanocomposite hydrogels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201710951 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  143. Wimpenny DI, Bryden B, Pashby IR (2003) Rapid laminated tooling. J Mater Process Technol 138(1–3):214–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00074-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wu ZY, Li C, Liang HW, Chen JF, Yu SH (2013) Ultralight, flexible, and fire-resistant carbon nanofiber aerogels from bacterial cellulose. Angew Chem 125(10):2997–3001.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201209676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wu Y, Lin ZY, Wenger AC, Tam KC, Tang X (2018) 3d bioprinting of liver-mimetic construct with alginate/cellulose nanocrystal hybrid bioink. Bioprinting 9:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2017.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Xu H-N, Tang Y-Y, Ouyang X-K (2017) Shear-induced breakup of cellulose nanocrystal aggregates. Langmuir 33(1):235–242.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03807 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Yang G, Li X, He Y, Ma J, Ni G, Zhou S (2018) From nano to micro to macro: electrospun hierarchically structured polymeric fibers for biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 81:80–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Yu DG, Branford-White C, Ma ZH, Zhu LM, Li XY, Yang XL (2009) Novel drug delivery devices for providing linear release profiles fabricated by 3dp. Int J Pharm 370(1–2):160–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.12.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Zander NE, Dong H, Steele J, Grant JT (2014) Metal cation cross-linked nanocellulose hydrogels as tissue engineering substrates. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(21):18502–18510.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am506007z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Zhang F, Wei M, Viswanathan VV, Swart B, Shao Y, Wu G, Zhou C (2017) 3d printing technologies for electrochemical energy storage. Nano Energy 40:418–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Zhao Y, Li Y, Mao S, Sun W, Yao R (2015) The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3d cell printing technology. Biofabrication 7(4):045002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Zhu H, Luo W, Ciesielski PN, Fang Z, Zhu JY, Henriksson G, Himmel ME, Hu L (2016) Wood-derived materials for green electronics, biological devices, and energy applications. Chem Rev 116(16):9305–9374.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biofuel Institute, College of the Environment and Safety EngineeringJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina

Personalised recommendations