Abstract
Establishing long-term relative bounded motion between orbits in perturbed dynamics is a key challenge in astrodynamics to enable cluster flight with minimum propellant expenditure. In this work, we present an approach that allows for the design of long-term relative bounded motion considering a zonal gravitational model. Entire sets of orbits are obtained via high-order Taylor expansions of Poincarè return maps about reference fixed points. The high-order normal form algorithm is used to determine a change in expansion variables of the map into normal form space, in which the phase space behavior is circular and can be easily parameterized by action–angle coordinates. The action–angle representation of the normal form coordinates is then used to parameterize the original Poincarè return map and average it over a full phase space revolution by a path integral along the angle parameterization. As a result, the averaged nodal period and drift in the ascending node are obtained, for which the bounded motion conditions are straightforwardly imposed. Sets of highly accurate bounded orbits are obtained, extending over several thousand kilometers, and valid for decades.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alfriend, K.T., Vadali, S.R., Gurfil, P., How, J.P., Breger, L.S.: Spacecraft Formation Flying: Dynamics, Control and Navigation, pp. 144–146. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2010)
Armellin, R., Di Lizia, P., Berz, M., Makino, K.: Computing the critical points of the distance function between two Keplerian orbits via rigorous global optimization. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 107(3), 377–395 (2010)
Armellin, R., Di Lizia, P., Topputo, F., Lavagna, M., Bernelli-Zazzera, F., Berz, M.: Gravity assist space pruning based on differential algebra. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 106(1), 1–24 (2010)
Baresi, N., Olikara, Z.P., Scheeres, D.J.: Fully numerical methods for continuing families of quasi-periodic invariant tori in astrodynamics. J. Astron. Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-017-0124-6
Baresi, N., Scheeres, D.J.: Bounded relative motion under zonal harmonics perturbations. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 127(4), 527–548 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-016-9737-5
Baresi, N., Scheeres, D.J.: Design of bounded relative trajectories in the earth zonal problem. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 40(12), 3075–3087 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002603
Berz, M.: The method of power series tracking for the mathematical description of beam dynamics. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 258(3), 431–436 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(87)90927-2
Berz, M.: Differential algebraic description of beam dynamics to very high orders. Part. Accel. 24(SSC–152), 109–124 (1988)
Berz, M.: Differential algebraic formulation of normal form theory. In: Conference series—Institute of Physics, vol. 131, pp. 77–86. IOP Publishing LTD (1993)
Berz, M.: Modern Map Methods in Particle Beam Physics. Academic Press, Cambridge (1999)
Berz, M., Makino, K.: COSY INFINITY Version 10.0 beam physics manual. Technical report MSUHEP-151103-rev, Michigan State University, East Lansing (2017)
Broucke, R.A.: Numerical integration of periodic orbits in the main problem of artificial satellite theory. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 58(2), 99–123 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00695787
Brown, O., Eremenko, P.: Fractionated space architectures: a vision for responsive space. Technical report Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Arlington VA (2006)
Chu, J., Guo, J., Gill, E.K.A.: Long-term passive distance-bounded relative motion in the presence of \(J_2\) perturbations. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 121(4), 385–413 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-015-9603-x
Clohessy, W.H., Wiltshire, R.S.: Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. J. Aerosp. Sci. 27(9), 653–658 (1960). https://doi.org/10.2514/8.8704
Cook, G.E.: Luni-solar perturbations of the orbit of an earth satellite. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 6(3), 271–291 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1962.tb00351.x
D’Amico, S., Ardaens, J.S., Larsson, R.: Spaceborne autonomous formation flying experiment on the PRISMA mission. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 35(3), 834–850 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.55638
D’Amico, S., Montenbruck, O.: Proximity operations of formation-flying spacecraft using an eccentricity/inclination vector separation. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 29(3), 554–563 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.15114
Dang, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y.: Improved initialization conditions and single impulsive maneuvers for \(J_2\)-invariant relative orbits. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 121(3), 301–327 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-014-9601-4
Gim, D.W., Alfriend, K.T.: State transition matrix of relative motion for the perturbed noncircular reference orbit. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 26(6), 956–971 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6924
Grote, J., Berz, M., Makino, K.: High-order representation of Poincaré maps. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 558(1), 106–111 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.01.001
Gurfil, P.: Relative motion between elliptic orbits: generalized boundedness conditions and optimal formationkeeping. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 28(4), 761–767 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.9439
Gurfil, P.: Generalized solutions for relative spacecraft orbits under arbitrary perturbations. Acta Astronaut. 60(2), 61–78 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.07.013
He, Y., Armellin, R., Xu, M.: Bounded relative orbits in the zonal problem via high-order Poincaré maps. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 42(1), 91–108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003612
Inalhan, G., Tillerson, M., How, J.P.: Relative dynamics and control of spacecraft formations in eccentric orbits. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 25(1), 48–59 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4874
Kolchin, E.R.: Differential Algebra and Algebraic Groups, vol. 54. Academic press, Cambridge (1973)
Koon, W.S., Marsden, J.E., Murray, R.M., Masdemont, J.: \(J_2\) dynamics and formation flight. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. AIAA, Montreal, Canada (2001)
Lizia, P.D., Armellin, R., Lavagna, M.: Application of high order expansions of two-point boundary value problems to astrodynamics. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 102(4), 355–375 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-008-9170-5
Makino, K., Berz, M.: COSY INFINITY version 9. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 558(1), 346–350 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.11.109
Martinusi, V., Gurfil, P.: Closed-form solutions for satellite relative motion in an axially-symmetric gravitational field. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. 140, 1525–1544 (2011)
Montenbruck, O., Kirschner, M., D’Amico, S., Bettadpur, S.: E/I-vector separation for safe switching of the grace formation. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10(7), 628–635 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2006.04.001
Poincaré, H.: Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste, vol. I–III. Gauthier-Villars it fils, Paris (1899)
Ritt, J.F.: Differential equations from the algebraic standpoint, vol. 14. American Mathematical Soc, Washington, D.C. (1932)
Ritt, J.F., Liouville, J.: Integration in finite terms: Liouville’s theory of elementary methods. Columbia University Press, New York (1948)
Schaub, H., Alfriend, K.T.: \(J_2\) invariant relative orbits for spacecraft formations. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 79(2), 77–95 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011161811472
Schweighart, S.A., Sedwick, R.J.: High-fidelity linearized J model for satellite formation flight. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 25(6), 1073–1080 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4986
Sullivan, J., Grimberg, S., D’Amico, S.: Comprehensive survey and assessment of spacecraft relative motion dynamics models. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 40(8), 1837–1859 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002309
Vadali, S., Schaub, H., Alfriend, K.: Initial conditions and fuel-optimal control for formation flying of satellites. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. Portland, OR (1999)
Weisskopf, A.: Introduction to the differential algebra normal form algorithm using the centrifugal governor as an example. Technical Report MSUHEP-190617, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing (2019). arXiv:1906.10758 [physics.class-ph]
Weisskopf, A., Tarazona, D., Berz, M.: Computation and consequences of high order amplitude- and parameter-dependent tune shifts in storage rings for high precision measurements. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1942011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X19420119
Wittig, A., Di Lizia, P., Armellin, R., Makino, K., Bernelli-Zazzera, F., Berz, M.: Propagation of large uncertainty sets in orbital dynamics by automatic domain splitting. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 122(3), 239–261 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-015-9618-3
Xu, M., Wang, Y., Xu, S.: On the existence of \(J_2\) invariant relative orbits from the dynamical system point of view. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 112(4), 427–444 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-012-9401-7
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes with a scholarship to one of the authors (A. Weisskopf). The foundation of the normal form methods has been developed for beam physics application under the contract no. DE-FG02-08ER41546/DE-SC0018636 of the U.S. Department of Energy. Additionally, we greatly appreciate the insightful comments from the two reviewers of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weisskopf, A., Armellin, R. & Berz, M. Bounded motion design in the Earth zonal problem using differential algebra based normal form methods. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 132, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-020-9953-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-020-9953-x