Abstract
Abraham Maslow’s needs theory is one of the most influential motivation theories in management and organizational behavior. What are its anthropological and ethical presuppositions? Are they consistent with sound business philosophy and ethics? This paper analyzes and assesses the anthropological and ethical underpinnings of Maslow’s needs theory from a personalistic framework, and concludes that they are flawed. Built on materialistic naturalism, the theory’s “humanistic” claims are subverted by its reductionist, individualistic approach to the human being, which ends up in a needs-based ethics that understands goodness, virtue, and rights in instinctual, subjectivistic, and relativistic terms. Its moral imperative, “Be yourself!,” is either the materialistic fiat of genetic drives or the voluntaristic command of unbridled will. Significant implications for business educators, managers, and organizations are discussed, along with recommendations. Managerial theories and approaches that reduce personality to individuality are inconsistent with proper anthropological and ethical business principles. Adopting those individualistic theories may ultimately undermine organizational effectiveness, and the very essence of business as human activity and of management as human calling. Instead, personalistic anthropology and virtue ethics, rooted in Aristotelian–Thomistic thought, soundly account for properly human nature and the good life. Business educators and practitioners are encouraged to embrace this integral, truly humanistic framework for motivation, and management theory and practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
When Maslow explained the peak-experience phenomenon (1962/1968, 1964/1970) to his students, most “claimed to have had peaks, too”; yet, when he later interviewed Eleanor Roosevelt, “she declared brusquely that she had no idea what he was talking about” (Milton 2002, p. 53; see also, Frick 2000, pp. 142–143).
“The study of the human being by science or by self-search can discover where he is heading, what is his purpose in life, what is good for him and what is bad for him, what will make him feel virtuous and what will make him feel guilty, why choosing the good is often difficult for him, what the attractions of evil are. (Observe that the word ‘ought’ need not be used. Also such knowledge of man is relative to man only and does not purport to be ‘absolute.’)” (Maslow 1962/1968, p. 205).
Further discussion of other possible influences on Maslow’s theory, humanistic psychology, and related work—such as the thought of Bacon (empiricism, scientism), Descartes (dualism, idealism, subjectivism), Hume (radical empiricism, emotivism), Darwin (biological determinism, natural selection), Schopenhauer (motivation by desires, voluntarism), Comte (scientism), and Sartre (subjectivist existentialism)—though promising as topic for future research, is beyond the scope of this article. I thank the anonymous JBE reviewers who pointed out two key antecedents of the attack on organized religion: Auguste Comte (who saw himself as high priest, and positivism as substitute religion) and, much earlier, the Reformation. Maslow’s disdainful attitude toward organized religion will be discussed later.
“how tough I’d be with the rioters (I’d shoot them if necessary, even to kill if unavoidable — but only, of course, if the society were behind this & could take it in the political sense). I’d jail & punish all the civil disobedients [sic]. And for the ones who plume themselves on being arrested, I’d have real punishment, anything that they would fear & that would deter them, even if I had to change the laws about cruel & unusual punishment. […] This is prepotent to ‘liberties,’ to rights, to anything. […] As for unemployed loafers today, in a time of shortages of help, I’d simply be willing to let them starve ultimately. […] Being authoritarian at the lower need levels of society (most of the ‘new nations’) instead of politically democratic [sic]. […] But for highly developed & economic democracies, I’d push toward philosophical anarchism” (May 25, 1966 journal entry, Maslow 1979, pp. 631–632).
The fact-value or is-ought problem, and the related naturalistic fallacy, has been covered at length in the moral philosophy literature (e.g., Frankena 1939; MacIntyre 1981/2007; McInerny 1997; Tollefsen 1995). Its further discussion is beyond the scope of this article. Suffice it to stress that, absent the proper teleological metaphysical and anthropological basis, Maslow’s rendition of the “is-ought” connection is open to the naturalistic fallacy criticism.
References
Acevedo, A. (2012). Personalist business ethics and humanistic management: Insights from Jacques Maritain. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 197–219.
Aquinas, St. T. (1920/2008). Summa Theologica (Rev. ed.). Fathers of the English Dominican Province (Trans.). Retrieved May 23, 2015, from http://www.newadvent.org/summa/.
Argandoña, A. (2011). Beyond contracts: Love in firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 77–85.
Arnaud, S., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2014). Corporate humanistic responsibility: Social performance through managerial discretion of the HRM. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3), 313–334.
Bennis, W. (1998). Foreward. In A. H. Maslow (Ed.), Maslow on management (pp. vii–xiii). New York: Wiley.
Bergman, J. Z., Westerman, J. W., & Daly, J. P. (2010). Narcissism in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 119–131.
Buber, M. (1937/1958). I and thou. New York: Charles Scribner’s.
Buss, A. R. (1979). A dialectical psychology. New York: Irvington.
Crosby, J. F. (2014). The personalism of John Henry Newman. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.
DeCarvalho, R. J. (1991). “Was Maslow an Aristotelian?” Revisited. The Psychological Record, 41(1), 117–123.
DeRobertis, E. M. (2013). Humanistic psychology: Alive in the 21st century? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53(4), 419–437.
Donaldson, L. (2002). Damned by our own theories: Contradictions between theories and management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 96–106.
Dye, K., Mills, A. J., & Weatherbee, T. (2005). Maslow: Man interrupted: Reading management theory in context. Management Decision, 43(10), 1375–1395.
Fitzgerald, R. (1985). Human needs and politics: The ideas of Christian Bay and Herbert Marcuse. Political Psychology, 6(1), 87–108.
Fontrodona, J., & Sison, A. J. G. (2006). The nature of the firm, agency theory and shareholder theory: A critique from philosophical anthropology. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 33–42.
Frankena, W. K. (1939). The naturalistic fallacy. Mind, 48(192), 464–477.
Frankl, V. E. (1959/1985). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Frick, W. B. (2000). Remembering Maslow: Reflections on a 1968 interview. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40(2), 128–147.
Froh, J. J. (2004). The history of positive psychology: Truth be told. NYS Psychologist, 16(3), 18–20.
Gambrel, P. A., & Cianci, R. (2003). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Does it apply in a collectivist culture. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 143–161.
Garrison, A. (2001). Restoring the human in humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(4), 91–104.
Geiger, H. (1971). Introduction. In A. H. Maslow (Ed.), The farther reaches of human nature (pp. xv–xxi). New York: Penguin.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.
Goud, N. (2008). Abraham Maslow: A personal statement. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48(4), 448–451.
Grassl, W., & Habisch, A. (2011). Ethics and economics: Towards a new humanistic synthesis for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 37–49.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist.
Guillén, M., Ferrero, I., & Hoffman, W. M. (2015). The neglected ethical and spiritual motivations in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 803–816.
Harter, N. (2006). Voegelin’s ladder. Integral Review, 2, 78–89.
Hartman, E. M. (2011). Virtue, profit, and the separation thesis: An Aristotelian view. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 5–17.
Hitchcock, J. (1982). What is secular humanism? Why humanism became secular and how it is changing our world. Ann Arbor, MI: Servant Books.
Hoffman, E. (1992). The last interview of Abraham Maslow. Psychology Today, 25(1), 68–89.
Hoffman, E. (2004). Abraham Maslow’s life and unfinished legacy. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science, 17(3), 133–138.
Hoffman, E. (2008a). Abraham Maslow: A biographer’s reflections. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48(4), 439–443.
Hoffman, E. (2008b). Maslow in retrospect: Editorial board member assessments. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48(4), 456–457.
Hoffman, E. (2009). Rollo May on Maslow and Rogers “No theory of evil”. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 49(4), 484–485.
Hoffman, E. (2011, September 4). The life and legacy of Abraham Maslow: Why Abraham Maslow still matters. Psychology Today, 44(5). Retrieved October 1, 2014, from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-peak-experience/201109/the-life-and-legacy-abraham-maslow.
Hofstede, G. (1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 389–398.
Hoivik, H., & Melé, D. (2009). Can an SME become a global citizen? Evidence from a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 551–563.
Hunt, H. T. (2003). Lives in spirit: Precursors and dilemmas of a secular Western mysticism. Albany: State University of New York.
Kermally, S. (2005). Abraham Maslow. Gurus on people management (pp. 25–34). London: Thorogood.
Kohn, A. (1999). A look at Maslow’s “basic propositions”. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), Perceiving, behaving, becoming: Lessons learned (pp. 91–104). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of General Psychology, 10(4), 302–317.
Koontz, H., & Weihrich, H. (2010). Essentials of management (8th ed.). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
Leontiev, D. A. (2008). Maslow yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48(4), 451–453.
Lowry, R. (1999). Preface. In A. H. Maslow (Ed.), Toward a psychology of being (3rd ed., pp. xxxv–xxxvii). New York: Wiley.
MacIntyre, A. (1981/2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
Maddock, R. C., & Fulton, R. L. (1996). Marketing to the mind: Right brain strategies for advertising and marketing. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Marcel, G. (1951). The mystery of the family. In G. Marcel (Ed.), Homo viator: Introduction to a metaphysic of hope (pp. 68–97). London: Gollancz.
Marcel, G. (1962). The sacred in the technological age. Theology Today, 19(1), 27–38.
Maritain, J. (1943/2001). Natural rights. In W. Sweet (Ed.), Natural law: Reflections on theory and practice (pp. 75–98). South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.
Maritain, J. (1947/1972). The person and the common good. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
Martin, F. (2011). Human development and the pursuit of the common good: Social psychology or Aristotelian virtue ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 89–98.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
Maslow, A. H. (1954/1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper.
Maslow, A. H. (1962/1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand.
Maslow, A. H. (1964/1970). Religions, values, and peak experiences. New York: Viking.
Maslow, A. H. (1965/1998). Maslow on management. New York: Wiley.
Maslow, A. H. (1966/2002). The psychology of science: A reconnaissance (2nd ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: Maurice Bassett.
Maslow, A. H. (1967). The good life of the self-actualizing person. The Humanist, 27(127–129), 139.
Maslow, A. H. (1971/1976). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Penguin.
Maslow, A. H. (1979). In R. Lowry & B. G. Maslow (Eds.), The journals of A. H. Maslow (Vol. 1). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Maslow, A. H. (1982). In R. Lowry & B. G. Maslow (Eds.), The journals of A. H. Maslow (Abridged ed.). Lexington, MA: Lewis.
McInerny, R. (1997). Ethica Thomistica: The moral philosophy of Thomas Aquinas (Rev ed.). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.
Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77–88.
Melé, D. (2005). Exploring the principle of subsidiarity in organizational forms. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 293–305.
Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227–244.
Melé, D. (2012). The firm as a “community of persons”: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101.
Milton, J. (2002). The road to malpsychia: Humanistic psychology and our discontents. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
Mittelman, W. (1991). Maslow’s study of self-actualization: A reinterpretation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31(1), 114–135.
Mosley, D, Sr, Mosley, D, Jr, & Pietri, P. (2011). Supervisory management (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
Neher, A. (1991). Maslow’s theory of motivation: A critique. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31(3), 89–112.
Pearson, E. M., & Podeschi, R. L. (1999). Humanism and individualism: Maslow and his critics. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(1), 41–55.
Plunkett, W. R., Allen, G. S., & Attner, R. F. (2012). Management (10th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
Reader, S. (2006). Does a basic needs approach need capabilities? Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 337–350.
Robb, J. W. (1969). The hidden philosophical agenda: A commentary on humanistic psychology. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 37(1), 3–14.
Rowan, J. (1999). Ascent and descent in Maslow’s theory. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 39(3), 125–133.
Royal, R. (1990). Human nature and unnatural humanisms. In P. A. Redpath (Ed.), From twilight to dawn: The cultural vision of Jacques Maritain (pp. 167–200). Mishawaka, IN: American Maritain Association.
Rutledge, P. (2011, November 8). Social networks: What Maslow misses. Psychology Today. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/positively-media/201111/social-networks-what-maslow-misses-0.
Sandelands, L. (2009). The business of business is the human person: Lessons from the Catholic social tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 93–101.
Sandelands, L. E. (2014). Being at work. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Saunders, S., Munro, D., & Bore, M. (1998). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and its relationship with psychological health and materialism. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 15–25.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.
Shareff, R. (2007). Want better business theories? Maybe Karl Popper has the answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(2), 272–280.
Sison, A. J. G. (2007). Toward a common good theory of the firm: The Tasubinsa case. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 471–480.
Solomon, R. C. (2003). Victims of circumstances? A defense of virtue ethics in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 43–62.
Soper, B., Milford, G. E., & Rosenthal, G. T. (1995). Belief when evidence does not support theory. Psychology & Marketing, 12(5), 415–422.
Tollefsen, C. O. (1995). The ‘is-ought’ problem, objective ends, and practical reason. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University, Georgia.
Trigg, A. B. (2004). Deriving the Engel curve: Pierre Bourdieu and the social critique of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Review of Social Economy, 62(3), 393–406.
Udani, Z. A. S., & Lorenzo-Molo, C. F. (2013). When servant becomes leader: The Corazon C. Aquino success story as a beacon for business leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 373–391.
Valiunas, A. (2011). Abraham Maslow and the all-American self. The New Atlantis, 33(Fall), 93–110.
Van Belle, H. A. (2012). Humanistic psychology. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from http://www.kingsu.ca/public/download/documents/1968.
Van Dierendonck, D., & Patterson, K. (2015). Compassionate love as a cornerstone of servant leadership: An integration of previous theorizing and research. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 119–131.
Veatch, H. B. (1962). Rational man: A modern interpretation of Aristotelian ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University.
Vitz, P. C. (1977). Psychology as religion: The cult of self-worship. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
Vitz, P. C. (1996). Back to human dignity: From modern to postmodern psychology. The Intercollegiate Review, 31(2), 15–23.
Wahba, M. A., & Bridwell, L. G. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15(2), 212–240.
Whetstone, J. T. (2001). How virtue fits within business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 101–114.
Whetstone, J. T. (2002). Personalism and moral leadership: The servant leader with a transforming vision. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(4), 385–392.
Wild, J. (1948). Introduction to realistic philosophy. New York: Harper.
Williams, T. D. (2004). What is Thomistic personalism? Alpha Omega, 7(2), 163–197.
Williams, T. D., & Bengtsson, J. O. (2013). Personalism. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (2014 ed.). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/personalism/.
Wishloff, J. (2009). The land of realism and the shipwreck of idea-ism: Thomas Aquinas and Milton Friedman on the social responsibilities of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 137–155.
Zúñiga, G. L. (2001). What is economic personalism? A phenomenological analysis. Journal of Markets & Morality, 4(2), 151–175.
Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges three anonymous JBE reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Acevedo, A. A Personalistic Appraisal of Maslow’s Needs Theory of Motivation: From “Humanistic” Psychology to Integral Humanism. J Bus Ethics 148, 741–763 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2970-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2970-0