Abstract
I describe an ethic for business administration based on the social tradition of the Catholic Church. I find that much current thinking about business falters for its conceit of truth. Abstractions such as the shareholder-value model contain truth – namely, that business is an economic enterprise to manage for the wealth of its owners. But, as in all abstractions, this truth comes at the expense of falsehood – namely, that persons are assets to deploy on behalf of owners. This last is “wrong” in both senses of the word – it is factually wrong in that persons are far more than business assets, they are supernatural beings, children of God; and it is morally wrong in that it is an injustice to treat them as the former when they are the latter. I draw upon the social tradition of the Catholic Church to recognize that the business of business is not business, but is instead the human person. Following Church teachings, I describe a person-centered ethic of business based upon eight social principles that both correct and enlarge the shareholder-centered ethic of much current business thinking. I discuss implications of this person-centered ethic for business administration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alford H., M. J. Naughton: 2002, Beyond the Shareholder Model of the Firm. In S. A. Cortright, M. J. Naughton (eds.), Rethinking the Purpose of Business, (University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN)
Arrow, K.: 1994, ‹Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge’, American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, May 1–9
Burrough B., J. Helyar: 1990, Barbarians at the Gate (Harper and Row, New York)
Calvez J., M. J. Naughton: 2002, Catholic Social Teaching and the Purpose of the Business Organization. In S. A. Cortright, M. J. Naughton (eds.) Rethinking the Purpose of Business (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN)
Catechism of the Catholic Church: 1995 (Doubleday, New York)
Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church: 2004 (Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Vatican City)
Dickens C.: 2005, A Christmas Carol, Prestwick House, Clayton, DL
Durkheim E.: 1933, The Division of Labor in Society (Macmillan, New York)
Follett, M. P.: 1942, in H. C. Metcalf and L. Urwick (eds.), Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett (Harper & Brothers, New York)
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, September 13
Gaudium et Spes: 1965 (Church Council of Vatican II, #64)
Ghoshal S.: 2005, Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1): 75–91
Hobbes T.: 1958, Leviathan (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN)
Huizinga J.: 1950, Homo Ludens (Beacon Press, Boston)
Jackall R.: 1988, Moral Mazes (Oxford University, New York)
Jensen M. C., W. H. Meckling: 1976, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360
John Paul II: 1991, Encyclical Letter: Centesimus Annus (http://www.vatican.va)
John Paul II: 1998, Encyclical Letter: Fides et Ratio (http://www.vatican.va)
Lasch C.: 1979, The Culture of Narcissism (W.W. Norton, New York)
Lewis, S.: 1922, Babbitt (Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, San Diego, CA)
McLean B., P. Elkind: 2003, The Smartest Guys in the Room (Penguin, New York)
Novak M.: 1996, Business as a Calling (The Free Press, New York)
Sandelands L. E.: 2003, Thinking About Social Life (University Press of America, Lanham, MD)
Sandelands L. E.: 2007, An Anthropological Defense of God (Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandelands, L. The Business of Business is the Human Person: Lessons from the Catholic Social Tradition. J Bus Ethics 85, 93–101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9751-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9751-y